Part of
Interacting with Objects: Language, materiality, and social activityEdited by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann and Mirka Rauniomaa
[Not in series 186] 2014
► pp. 57–78
Edited by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann and Mirka Rauniomaa
[Not in series 186] 2014
► pp. 57–78
Initiating activity shifts through use of appraisal forms as material objects during performance appraisal interviews
This study shows how participants of performance appraisal interviews use appraisal forms as material objects in initiations of activity shifts. Participants negotiate their willingness to proceed from one interview item to another by gazing at, pointing toward and manipulating the forms. This study contributes to earlier studies of written documents as material objects in interaction, by showing, firstly, how written documents can be used in a step-by-step embodied negotiation; secondly, how orientation to material objects makes it possible for participants to conduct two activities at the same time; and thirdly, how the document’s role as the agenda of an encounter is consequential for the activity. The data of this study consist of six video-recorded appraisal interviews from a Finnish public organisation.
References (34)
Antaki, C., Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., & Rapley, M. (2000). “Brilliant. Next question…”: High-grade assessment sequences in the completion of interactional units. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(3), 235–262. 
Asmuss, B. (2008). Performance appraisal interviews: Preference organization in assessment sequences. Journal of Business Communication, 45(4), 408–429.
Beach, W.A. (1995). Preserving and constraining options: “Okays” and ‘official’ priorities in medical interviews. In G.H. Morris, & R.J. Chenail (Eds.), The talk of the clinic: Explorations in the analysis of medical and therapeutic discourse (pp. 259–289). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Button, G. (1991). Conversation-in-a-series. In D. Boden, & D.H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 251–277). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Clifton, J. (2012). Conversation analysis in dialogue with stocks of interactional knowledge: Facework and appraisal interviews. Journal of Business Communication, 49(4), 283–311.
Deppermann, A., Schmitt, R., & Mondada, L. (2010). Agenda and emergence: Contingent and planned activities in a meeting. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1700–1718.
Glenn, P., & LeBaron, C. (2011). Epistemic authority in employment interviews: Glancing, pointing, touching. Discourse & Communication, 5(1), 3–22.
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53–73.
Heath, C. (1986). Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holt, E. (2010). The last laugh: Shared laughter and topic termination. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1513–1525.
Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (2000). Interaction and the standardized survey interview: The living questionnaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Komter, M. (2006). Introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(3), 195–200.
Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C., Goodwin, C., & Feltovich, P. (2011). “Can you see the cystic artery yet?”: A simple matter of trust. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 521–541.
Laurier, E. (2008). Drinking up endings: Conversational resources of the café. Language & Communication, 28(2), 165–181.
Lynch, M. (2002). Protocols, practices, and the reproduction of technique in molecular biology. British Journal of Sociology, 53(2), 203–220.
Mondada, L. (2006). Participants’ online analysis and multimodal practices: Projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 117–129.
. (2012). Video analysis and the temporality of inscriptions within social interaction: The case of architects at work. Qualitative Research, 12(3), 304–333.
Mortensen, K., & Lundsgaard, C. (2011). Preliminary notes on ‘grooming the object’: The example of an architectural presentation. In J. Buur (Ed.),
Participatory Innovation Conference, 13th–15th January, Sønderborg, Denmark
(pp. 91–96).
Nevile, M. (2004). Integrity in the airline cockpit: Embodying claims about progress for the conduct of an approach briefing. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(4), 447–480.
Nielsen, M.F. (2012). Using artifacts in brainstorming sessions to secure participation and decouple sequentiality. Discourse Studies, 14(1), 87–109.
Nielsen, M.F., Nielsen, S.B., Gravengaard, G., & Due, B. (2012). Interactional functions of invoking procedure in institutional settings. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(11), 1457–1473.
Robinson, J., & Stivers, T. (2001). Achieving activity transitions in primary-care encounters: From history taking to physical examination. Human Communication Research, 27(2), 253–298.
Ruusuvuori, J. (2000). Control in medical consultation: Practices of giving and receiving the reason for the visit in primary health care. Tampere: Acta Electronica Universitatis Tamperensis 16.
. (2001). Looking means listening: Coordinating displays of engagement in doctor–patient interaction. Social Science & Medicine, 52(7), 1093–1108.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Volume I. Edited by G. Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
Schegloff, E.A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327.
Schegloff, E.A. (1998). Body torque. Social Research, 65(3), 535–596.
. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Svennevig, J. (2012). The agenda as resource for topic introduction in workplace meetings. Discourse Studies, 14(1), 53–66.
Svinhufvud, K., & Vehviläinen, S. (2013). Papers, documents, and the opening of an academic supervision encounter. Text & Talk, 33(1), 139–166.
Cited by (15)
Cited by 15 other publications
Uyar, Gülşah & Ufuk Balaman
2024. The Role of Gazing Behaviors in Navigating Paired Role-Play Interactional Competence Assessment Tasks. Language Assessment Quarterly 21:3 ► pp. 266 ff. 
Heinonen, Pilvi, Jarkko Niemi & Timo Kaski
2023. Changing participation in web conferencing: the shared computer screen as an online sales interaction resource. Applied Linguistics Review 14:4 ► pp. 751 ff.
Van De Mieroop, Dorien
2023. Identity gatekeeping in New Work Order organizations. Pragmatics and Society 14:4 ► pp. 519 ff.
Ishino, Mika
2022. Teachers’ embodied mitigation against allocating turns to unwilling students. Classroom Discourse 13:4 ► pp. 343 ff.
Lehtinen, Esa & Pekka Pälli
2021. On the participatory agency of texts: Using institutional forms in performance appraisal interviews. Text & Talk 41:1 ► pp. 47 ff.
Ro, Eunseok
2021. Using written task answer sheets as notes while speaking: changing task-report practices in a second language book club. Text & Talk 41:3 ► pp. 335 ff.
Ro, Eunseok
2023. Changing practices of instruction-giving in video-mediated interaction for an extensive reading book club. Computer Assisted Language Learning ► pp. 1 ff.
Ro, Eunseok
2023. Note-taking/making as a resource for substantiating advice at a second language speaking center. Text & Talk 43:6 ► pp. 797 ff.
Dolata, Mateusz, Susanne Steigler, Fiona Nüesch, Ulrike Schock, Doris Agotai, Simon Schubiger, Mehmet Kilic & Gerhard Schwabe
2019. Welcome, Computer! How Do Participants Introduce a Collaborative Application During Face-to-Face Interaction?. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2019 [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11748], ► pp. 600 ff.
Ruusuvuori, Johanna, Birte Asmuß, Pentti Henttonen & Niklas Ravaja
2019. Complaining About Others at Work. Research on Language and Social Interaction 52:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
Yrjönsuuri, Varpu, Kaiju Kangas & Pirita Seitamaa-Hakkarainen
2019. Proceedings of the FabLearn Europe 2019 Conference, ► pp. 1 ff.
Childs, Carrie & Dave Walsh
2018. Paradoxical Invitations: Challenges in Soliciting More Information from Child Witnesses. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51:4 ► pp. 363 ff.
Björk-Willén, Polly
2016. Peer Collaboration in Front of Two Alphabet Charts. In Friendship and Peer Culture in Multilingual Settings [Sociological Studies of Children and Youth, 21], ► pp. 143 ff.
Kääntä, Leila, Gabriele Kasper & Arja Piirainen-Marsh
2016. Explaining Hooke’s Law: Definitional Practices in a CLIL Physics Classroom. Applied Linguistics ► pp. amw025 ff.
Mondada, Lorenza & Kimmo Svinhufvud
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.