Cover not available
Part of
Interacting with Objects: Language, materiality, and social activity
Edited by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann and Mirka Rauniomaa
[Not in series 186] 2014
► pp. 199–226

Cooking instructions and the shaping of things in the kitchen

ORCID logo | University of Basel

This chapter looks into the kitchen as a place where things are transformed into culinary preparations. On the basis of a video-recorded cooking course in which a group of trainees prepared a dinner under the supervision of a chef, I examine how objects are assembled, manipulated and transformed in a visibly embodied way. The chef instructs the trainees on how to prepare some ingredients and they organise their actions to follow these instructions. The analysis deals with the manipulation of ingredients at three key moments within this sequence of cooking instructions: the chef ’s instructions; questions following instructions; and instructed action leading to the final shaping of the ingredients. The first moment shows how objects have features that are taken for granted by experts; the second shows how participants work to identify the relevant aspects of the objects they manipulate; the third reveals the normative way in which objects are expected to be transformed.

Published online: 12 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.09mon
References
Amerine, R., & Bilmes, J
(1988) Following instructions. Human Studies, 11, 327–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antaki, C., & Kent, A
(2012) Telling people what to do (and, sometimes, why): Contingency, entitlement and explanation in staff requests to adults with intellectual impairments. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 826–889. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conein, B
(1997) L’action avec les objets: Un autre visage de l’action située? [Action with objects: Another view on situated action?] Raisons Pratiques, 8, 25–45.Google Scholar
Craven, A., & Potter, J
(2010) Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies, 12, 419–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curl, T.S., & Drew, P
(2008) Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(2), 129–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J
(1984) Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In J.M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 102–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Stefani, E., & Gazin, M.D
2014). Instructional sequences in driving lessons: Mobile participants and the temporal and sequential organization of actions. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 63–79. DOI logo
Galatolo, R., & Traverso, V
(2005) Two cooks at work: independent and coordinated lines of action. In L. Mondada, & V. Markaki (Eds.), Interacting Bodies: Proceedings of the 2nd International Society for Gesture Studies Conference .
Garfinkel, H
(1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
(2002) Ethnomethodology’s program. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Goldberg, J.A
(1975) A system for the transfer of instructions in natural settings. Semiotica, 14, 269–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C
(2009) Embodied hearers and speakers constructing talk and action in interaction. Cognitive Studies, 16(1), 51–64.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M.H., & Cekaite, A
(2013) Calibration in directive-response trajectories in family interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 122–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heinemann, T
(2006) “Will you or can’t you?”: Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 1081–1104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J
(1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 299–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A
(2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C., Goodwin, C., & Feltovich, P
(2011) “Can you see the cystic artery yet?”: A simple matter of trust. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 521–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, G.H
(1995) Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes, 19(1), 111–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindström, A
(2005) Language as social action: A Study of how senior citizens request assistance with practical tasks in the Swedish home help service. In A. Hakulinen & M. Selting (Eds.), Syntax and lexis in conversation (pp. 209–230). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindwall, O., & Ekström, A
(2012) Instructions-in-interaction: The teaching and learning of a manual skill. Human Studies, 35, 27–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M., & Jordan, K
(1995) Instructed actions, in, of and as molecular biology. Human Studies, 18(2–3), 227–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M., Livingston, E., & Garfinkel, H
(1983) Temporal order in laboratory work. In K. Knorr-Cetina, & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed. (pp. 205–238). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Macbeth, D
(2011) Understanding as an instructional matter. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 438–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L
(2007) Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9(2), 195–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011a) The organization of concurrent courses of action in surgical demonstrations. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. (pp. 207–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2011b) The situated organization of directives in French: Imperatives and action coordination in video games. Nottingham French Studies, 50(2), 19–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014). Instructions in the operating room: How surgeons direct the assistant’s hands. Discourse Studies, 16(2), 131–161. DOI logo
Sanchez Svensson, M., Heath, C., & Luff, P
(2007) Instrumental action: The timely exchange of implements during surgical operations. In L. Bannon, I. Wagner, C. Gutwin, R.H.R. Harper, & K. Schmidt, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Computer-Supported Work (pp. 41–60). London: Springer.Google Scholar
Sanchez Svensson, M., Luff, P., & Heath, C
(2009) Embedding instructions in practice: Contingency and collaboration during surgical training. Social Health & Illness, 31(6), 889–906. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.A., & Sacks, H
(1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.A
(2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T
(2005) Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(2), 131–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Morality and question design: “of course” as contesting a presupposition of askability. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 82–106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stukenbrock, A
(2012) Empraxis und Displacement: Überblendete Räume als interaktive Ressource [Empraxis and displacement: Overblended spaces as interactional resource]. In H. Hausendorf, L. Mondada, & R. Schmitt (Eds.), Raum als interaktive Ressource [Space as an interactional resource]. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Suchman, L
(1987) Plans and situated actions: The problem of human machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traverso, V. & Galatolo, R
(2008) Accès multiples au(x) contexte(s): l’exemple de cuisinières en action [Multiple access to contexts: The example of cooks in action]. Verbum, 2–3, 231–256.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L
(1953) Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Asplund, Stig-Börje & Nina Kilbrink
2018. Learning How (and How Not) to Weld: Vocational Learning in Technical Vocational Education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 62:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ehmer, Oliver & Geert Brône
2021. Instructing embodied knowledge: multimodal approaches to interactive practices for knowledge constitution. Linguistics Vanguard 7:s4 DOI logo
Heritage, John
2022. The Multiple Accountabilities of Action. In Action Ascription in Interaction, ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Jokipohja, Anna-Kaisa & Niina Lilja
2022. Depictive Hand Gestures as Candidate Understandings. Research on Language and Social Interaction 55:2 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Rasmussen, Gitte & Elisabeth Dalby Kristiansen
2022. The sociality of minimizing involvement in self-service shops in Denmark: Customers’ multi-modal practices of being, getting, and staying out of the way. Discourse & Communication 16:2 ► pp. 200 ff. DOI logo
Schmidt, Axel & Arnulf Deppermann
2023. Showing and telling—How directors combine embodied demonstrations and verbal descriptions to instruct in theater rehearsals. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Stevanovic, Melisa & Arniika Kuusisto
2019. Teacher Directives in Children’s Musical Instrument Instruction: Activity Context, Student Cooperation, and Institutional Priority. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 63:7 ► pp. 1022 ff. DOI logo
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
2023. ‘Go on keep going’: The instruction of sustained embodied activities. Discourse Studies 25:5 ► pp. 692 ff. DOI logo
Tuncer, Sylvaine, Oskar Lindwall & Barry Brown
2021. Making Time: Pausing to Coordinate Video Instructions and Practical Tasks. Symbolic Interaction 44:3 ► pp. 603 ff. DOI logo
Ursi, Biagio
2021. Le texte programmateur à l’épreuve des pratiques : une étude interactionnelle de la mobilisation de recettes de cuisine en situation. Langages N° 221:1 ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.