Article published in:
Interacting with Objects: Language, materiality, and social activity
Edited by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann and Mirka Rauniomaa
[Not in series 186] 2014
► pp. 199226
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Asplund, Stig-Börje & Nina Kilbrink
2018. Learning How (and How Not) to Weld: Vocational Learning in Technical Vocational Education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 62:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Rasmussen, Gitte & Elisabeth Dalby Kristiansen
2021. The sociality of minimizing involvement in self-service shops in Denmark: Customers’ multi-modal practices of being, getting, and staying out of the way. Discourse & Communication  pp. 175048132110436 ff. Crossref logo
Stevanovic, Melisa & Arniika Kuusisto
2019. Teacher Directives in Children’s Musical Instrument Instruction: Activity Context, Student Cooperation, and Institutional Priority. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 63:7  pp. 1022 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Amerine, R., & Bilmes, J.
(1988) Following instructions. Human Studies, 11, 327–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Antaki, C., & Kent, A.
(2012) Telling people what to do (and, sometimes, why): Contingency, entitlement and explanation in staff requests to adults with intellectual impairments. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 826–889. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conein, B.
(1997) L’action avec les objets: Un autre visage de l’action située? [Action with objects: Another view on situated action?] Raisons Pratiques, 8, 25–45.Google Scholar
Craven, A., & Potter, J.
(2010) Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies, 12, 419–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curl, T.S., & Drew, P.
(2008) Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(2), 129–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J.
(1984) Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In J.M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 102–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Stefani, E., & Gazin, M.D.
2014). Instructional sequences in driving lessons: Mobile participants and the temporal and sequential organization of actions. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 63–79. Crossref
Galatolo, R., & Traverso, V.
(2005) Two cooks at work: independent and coordinated lines of action. In L. Mondada, & V. Markaki (Eds.), Interacting Bodies: Proceedings of the 2nd International Society for Gesture Studies Conference .
Garfinkel, H.
(1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
(2002) Ethnomethodology’s program. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Goldberg, J.A.
(1975) A system for the transfer of instructions in natural settings. Semiotica, 14, 269–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(2009) Embodied hearers and speakers constructing talk and action in interaction. Cognitive Studies, 16(1), 51–64.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M.H., & Cekaite, A.
(2013) Calibration in directive-response trajectories in family interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 122–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heinemann, T.
(2006) “Will you or can’t you?”: Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 1081–1104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J.
(1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 299–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A.
(2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C., Goodwin, C., & Feltovich, P.
(2011) “Can you see the cystic artery yet?”: A simple matter of trust. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 521–541. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, G.H.
(1995) Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes, 19(1), 111–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, A.
(2005) Language as social action: A Study of how senior citizens request assistance with practical tasks in the Swedish home help service. In A. Hakulinen & M. Selting (Eds.), Syntax and lexis in conversation (pp. 209–230). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindwall, O., & Ekström, A.
(2012) Instructions-in-interaction: The teaching and learning of a manual skill. Human Studies, 35, 27–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M., & Jordan, K.
(1995) Instructed actions, in, of and as molecular biology. Human Studies, 18(2–3), 227–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M., Livingston, E., & Garfinkel, H.
(1983) Temporal order in laboratory work. In K. Knorr-Cetina, & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed. (pp. 205–238). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Macbeth, D.
(2011) Understanding as an instructional matter. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 438–451. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L.
(2007) Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9(2), 195–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011a) The organization of concurrent courses of action in surgical demonstrations. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. (pp. 207–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2011b) The situated organization of directives in French: Imperatives and action coordination in video games. Nottingham French Studies, 50(2), 19–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014). Instructions in the operating room: How surgeons direct the assistant’s hands. Discourse Studies, 16(2), 131–161. Crossref
Sanchez Svensson, M., Heath, C., & Luff, P.
(2007) Instrumental action: The timely exchange of implements during surgical operations. In L. Bannon, I. Wagner, C. Gutwin, R.H.R. Harper, & K. Schmidt, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Computer-Supported Work (pp. 41–60). London: Springer.Google Scholar
Sanchez Svensson, M., Luff, P., & Heath, C.
(2009) Embedding instructions in practice: Contingency and collaboration during surgical training. Social Health & Illness, 31(6), 889–906. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.A., & Sacks, H.
(1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.A.
(2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T.
(2005) Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(2), 131–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Morality and question design: “of course” as contesting a presupposition of askability. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 82–106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stukenbrock, A.
(2012) Empraxis und Displacement: Überblendete Räume als interaktive Ressource [Empraxis and displacement: Overblended spaces as interactional resource]. In H. Hausendorf, L. Mondada, & R. Schmitt (Eds.), Raum als interaktive Ressource [Space as an interactional resource]. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Suchman, L.
(1987) Plans and situated actions: The problem of human machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traverso, V. & Galatolo, R.
(2008) Accès multiples au(x) contexte(s): l’exemple de cuisinières en action [Multiple access to contexts: The example of cooks in action]. Verbum, 2–3, 231–256.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.
(1953) Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar