Article published in:
Interacting with Objects: Language, materiality, and social activity
Edited by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann and Mirka Rauniomaa
[Not in series 186] 2014
► pp. 319–338

Incidental and essential objects in interaction

Paper documents in journalistic work

| University of Gothenburg
| Uppsala University
A large body of work points to the special status of paper documents in the ecology of objects in the workplace. In this chapter, we revisit this work, focusing on the role of paper in the everyday work of journalists. We examine three quite different empirical examples where paper documents feature in interaction, supporting, in turn, the structuring of conversation, collaboration and inter-organisational interaction. Based on these examples we argue for a distinction between object-focused interactions and object-implicating interactions. In addition, and related to the dual nature of documents being both material objects and carriers of information, we identify an analytic dimension along which interactions with objects can be placed, that from incidental to essential.
Published online: 12 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.14wei
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Dolata, Mateusz, Birgit Schenk, Jara Fuhrer, Alina Marti & Gerhard Schwabe
2020. When the System Does Not Fit: Coping Strategies of Employment Consultants. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 29:6 ► pp. 657 ff. Crossref logo
Dolata, Mateusz & Gerhard Schwabe
2017. Paper Practices in Institutional Talk: How Financial Advisors Impress their Clients. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 26:4-6 ► pp. 769 ff. Crossref logo
Luff, Paul, Christian Heath, Naomi Yamashita, Hideaki Kuzuoka & Marina Jirotka
2016. Embedded Reference: Translocating Gestures in Video-Mediated Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:4 ► pp. 342 ff. Crossref logo
Mondada, Lorenza & Kimmo Svinhufvud
2016. Writing-in-interaction. Language and Dialogue 6:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Tuncer, Sylvaine & Pentti Haddington
2020. Object transfers: An embodied resource to progress joint activities and build relative agency. Language in Society 49:1 ► pp. 61 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References
Asmuss, B., & Oshima, S.
(2012) Negotiations of entitlement in proposal sequences. Discourse Studies, 14(1), 67–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Asmuss, B., & Svennevig, J.
(2009) Meeting talk: An introduction. Journal of Business Communication, 46(1), 3–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beach, W.A.
(1993) Transitional regularities for casual ‘okay’ usages. Journal of Pragmatics, 19(4), 325–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boden, D.
(1994) The business of talk: Organizations in action. Cambridge: Polity Press/Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Deppermann, A., Schmitt, R., & Mondada, L.
(2010) Agenda and emergence: Contingent and planned activities in a meeting. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1700–1718. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, P. & Holt, E.
(1998) Figures of speech: Figurative expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation. Language in Society, 27(4), 495–523. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H.
(2002) Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M., & Livingston, E.
(1981) The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11(2), 131–158.Google Scholar
Gaver, W.W.
(1996) Affordances for interaction: The social is material for design. Ecological Psychology, 8(2), 111–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(2000) Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hardstone, G., Hartswood, M., Procter, R., Slack, R., Voss, A., & Rees, G.
(2004) Supporting informality: Team working and integrated care records. In Proceedings of CSCW’04 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 2004 (pp. 142–151). New York, NY: ACM Press.Google Scholar
Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C.
(2000) Sharing the tools of the trade: The interactional constitution of workplace objects. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 29(5), 523–562. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A.
(2009) Creating history: Documents and patient participation in nurse–patient interviews. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31(6), 907–923. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
LeBaron, C., & Jones, S.
(2002) Closing up closings: Showing the relevance of the social and material surround to the completion of interaction. Journal of Communication, 52(3), 542–565. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luff, P.K., Heath, C., & Greatbatch, D.L.
(1992) Tasks-in-interaction: Paper and screen based activity in collaborative work. In Proceedings of CSCW’92 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 1992 (pp. 163–170). New York, NY: ACM Press.Google Scholar
Luff, P., Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C.
(Eds.) (2000) Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lutters, W.G., & Ackerman, M.S.
(2002) Achieving safety: A field study of boundary objects in aircraft technical support. In Proceedings of CSCW’02 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 2002 (pp. 266–275). New York, NY: ACM Press.Google Scholar
Mambrey, P., & Robinson, M.
(1997) Understanding the role of documents in a hierarchical flow of work. In Proceedings of GROUP ‘97 (pp. 119–127). New York, NY: ACM Press.Google Scholar
Mirivel, J.C., & Tracy, K.
(2005) Premeeting talk: An organizationally crucial form of talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(1), 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L.
(2012) Video analysis and the temporality of inscriptions within social interaction: The case of architects at work. Qualitative Research, 12(3), 304–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perry, M., O’Hara, K., Sellen, A., Brown, B., & Harper, R.
(2001) Dealing with mobility: Understanding access anytime, anywhere. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 8(4), 323–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, A.W.
(2005) Garfinkel’s conception of time. Time & Society, 14(2–3), 163–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sellen, A.J., & Harper, R.H.R.
(1997) Paper as an analytic resource for the design of new technologies. In Proceedings of CHI ’97 (pp. 319–326). New York, NY: ACM Press.Google Scholar
(2002) The myth of the paperless office. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Signer, B.
(2006) Fundamental concepts for interactive paper and cross media information spaces. PhD Dissertation ETH No.16218.Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Star, S.L., & Griesemer, J.R.
(1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stifelman, L., Aarons, B., & Schmandt, C.
(2001) The audio notebook: Paper and pen interaction with structured speech. In Proceedings of CHI ’01 (pp. 182–189). New York, NY: ACM Press.Google Scholar
Svinhufvud, K., & Vehviläinen, S.
(2013) Papers, documents, and the opening of academic supervision. Text & Talk, 33(1), 139–166.Google Scholar
Weiser, M.
(1999) Some computer science issues in ubiquitous computing. Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 3(3), 12–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winman, T., & Rystedt, H.
(2011) Electronic patient records in action: Transforming information into professionally relevant knowledge. Health Informatics Journal, 17(1), 51–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, R.B., Liao, C., Klemmer, S.R., Guimbretière, F., Lee, B., Kakaradov, B., Stamberger, J., & Paepcke, A.
(2006) ButterflyNet: A mobile capture and access system for field biology research. Proceedings of CHI ’06 (pp. 571–580). New York, NY: ACM Press.Google Scholar