Part of
Interacting with Objects: Language, materiality, and social activityEdited by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann and Mirka Rauniomaa
[Not in series 186] 2014
► pp. 319–338
Edited by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann and Mirka Rauniomaa
[Not in series 186] 2014
► pp. 319–338
Incidental and essential objects in interaction
Paper documents in journalistic work
A large body of work points to the special status of paper documents in the ecology of objects in the workplace. In this chapter, we revisit this work, focusing on the role of paper in the everyday work of journalists. We examine three quite different empirical examples where paper documents feature in interaction, supporting, in turn, the structuring of conversation, collaboration and inter-organisational interaction. Based on these examples we argue for a distinction between object-focused interactions and object-implicating interactions. In addition, and related to the dual nature of documents being both material objects and carriers of information, we identify an analytic dimension along which interactions with objects can be placed, that from incidental to essential.
References (31)
Asmuss, B., & Oshima, S. (2012). Negotiations of entitlement in proposal sequences. Discourse Studies, 14(1), 67–86. 
Asmuss, B., & Svennevig, J. (2009). Meeting talk: An introduction. Journal of Business Communication, 46(1), 3–22.
Beach, W.A. (1993). Transitional regularities for casual ‘okay’ usages. Journal of Pragmatics, 19(4), 325–352.
Boden, D. (1994). The business of talk: Organizations in action. Cambridge: Polity Press/Basil Blackwell.
Deppermann, A., Schmitt, R., & Mondada, L. (2010). Agenda and emergence: Contingent and planned activities in a meeting. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1700–1718.
Drew, P. & Holt, E. (1998). Figures of speech: Figurative expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation. Language in Society, 27(4), 495–523.
Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M., & Livingston, E. (1981). The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11(2), 131–158.
Gaver, W.W. (1996). Affordances for interaction: The social is material for design. Ecological Psychology, 8(2), 111–129.
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522.
Hardstone, G., Hartswood, M., Procter, R., Slack, R., Voss, A., & Rees, G. (2004). Supporting informality: Team working and integrated care records. In
Proceedings of CSCW’04 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 2004
(pp. 142–151). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2000). Sharing the tools of the trade: The interactional constitution of workplace objects. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 29(5), 523–562.
Jones, A. (2009). Creating history: Documents and patient participation in nurse–patient interviews. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31(6), 907–923.
LeBaron, C., & Jones, S. (2002). Closing up closings: Showing the relevance of the social and material surround to the completion of interaction. Journal of Communication, 52(3), 542–565.
Luff, P.K., Heath, C., & Greatbatch, D.L. (1992). Tasks-in-interaction: Paper and screen based activity in collaborative work. In
Proceedings of CSCW’92 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 1992
(pp. 163–170). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Luff, P., Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (Eds.) (2000). Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lutters, W.G., & Ackerman, M.S. (2002). Achieving safety: A field study of boundary objects in aircraft technical support. In
Proceedings of CSCW’02 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 2002
(pp. 266–275). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Mambrey, P., & Robinson, M. (1997). Understanding the role of documents in a hierarchical flow of work. In
Proceedings of GROUP ‘97
(pp. 119–127). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Mirivel, J.C., & Tracy, K. (2005). Premeeting talk: An organizationally crucial form of talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(1), 1–34.
Mondada, L. (2012). Video analysis and the temporality of inscriptions within social interaction: The case of architects at work. Qualitative Research, 12(3), 304–333.
Perry, M., O’Hara, K., Sellen, A., Brown, B., & Harper, R. (2001). Dealing with mobility: Understanding access anytime, anywhere. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 8(4), 323–347.
Rawls, A.W. (2005). Garfinkel’s conception of time. Time & Society, 14(2–3), 163–190.
Sellen, A.J., & Harper, R.H.R. (1997). Paper as an analytic resource for the design of new technologies. In
Proceedings of CHI ’97
(pp. 319–326). New York, NY: ACM Press.
. (2002). The myth of the paperless office. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Signer, B. (2006). Fundamental concepts for interactive paper and cross media information spaces. PhD Dissertation ETH No.16218.Zurich, Switzerland.
Star, S.L., & Griesemer, J.R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.
Stifelman, L., Aarons, B., & Schmandt, C. (2001). The audio notebook: Paper and pen interaction with structured speech. In
Proceedings of CHI ’01
(pp. 182–189). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Svinhufvud, K., & Vehviläinen, S. (2013). Papers, documents, and the opening of academic supervision. Text & Talk, 33(1), 139–166.
Weiser, M. (1999). Some computer science issues in ubiquitous computing. Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 3(3), 12–21.
Winman, T., & Rystedt, H. (2011). Electronic patient records in action: Transforming information into professionally relevant knowledge. Health Informatics Journal, 17(1), 51–62.
Yeh, R.B., Liao, C., Klemmer, S.R., Guimbretière, F., Lee, B., Kakaradov, B., Stamberger, J., & Paepcke, A. (2006). ButterflyNet: A mobile capture and access system for field biology research.
Proceedings of CHI ’06
(pp. 571–580). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Mlynář, Jakub, Himanshu Verma, Hamed S. Alavi & Denis Lalanne
2024. ‘All the good spots are already taken’: the visual properties of interior social sceneries. Visual Studies 39:4 ► pp. 516 ff. 
Baldauf-Quilliatre, Heike & Biagio Ursi
2023. Playing Together on a Large Screen: Spatiality, Materiality, Temporality and the Complexity of Interaction. In Complexity of Interaction, ► pp. 255 ff.
Lehtinen, Esa & Pekka Pälli
2021. On the participatory agency of texts: Using institutional forms in performance appraisal interviews. Text & Talk 41:1 ► pp. 47 ff.
Ro, Eunseok
2021. Using written task answer sheets as notes while speaking: changing task-report practices in a second language book club. Text & Talk 41:3 ► pp. 335 ff.
Ro, Eunseok
2023. Using PowerPoint slides as a resource for coordinating understanding during presentation consultations at an L2 speaking center. Applied Linguistics Review 14:3 ► pp. 579 ff.
Dolata, Mateusz, Birgit Schenk, Jara Fuhrer, Alina Marti & Gerhard Schwabe
2020. When the System Does Not Fit: Coping Strategies of Employment Consultants. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 29:6 ► pp. 657 ff.
Tuncer, Sylvaine & Pentti Haddington
2020. Object transfers: An embodied resource to progress joint activities and build relative agency. Language in Society 49:1 ► pp. 61 ff.
Dolata, Mateusz & Gerhard Schwabe
2017. Paper Practices in Institutional Talk: How Financial Advisors Impress their Clients. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 26:4-6 ► pp. 769 ff.
Luff, Paul, Christian Heath, Naomi Yamashita, Hideaki Kuzuoka & Marina Jirotka
2016. Embedded Reference: Translocating Gestures in Video-Mediated Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:4 ► pp. 342 ff.
Mondada, Lorenza & Kimmo Svinhufvud
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.