Article published in:
Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond multitasking
Edited by Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada and Maurice Nevile
[Not in series 187] 2014
► pp. 332
References
Arminen, I.
(2005) Institutional interaction: Studies of talk at work. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Baron, N.S.
(2008) Adjusting the volume: Technology and multitasking in discourse control. Mobile Communication Studies, 177–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bittman, M., & Wajcman, J.
(2000) The rush hour: The character of leisure time and gender equity. Social Forces, 79(1), 165–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Broth, M.
(2009) Seeing through screens, hearing through speakers: Managing distant studio space in television control room interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1998–2016. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Datchary, C., & Licoppe, C.
(2007) La multi-activité et ses appuis: l’exemple de la “présence obstinée” des messages dans l’environnement de travail [Supporting multiactivity: The example of “stubborn presence” messages in the work environment]. Activités, 4(1), 4–29.Google Scholar
Drew, P., & Heritage, J.
(Eds.) (1992) Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Egbert, M.
(1997) Schisming: The collaborative transformation from a single conversation to multiple conversations. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30(1), 1–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Esbjörnsson, M., Juhlin, O., & Weilenmann, A.
(2007) Drivers using mobile phones in traffic: An ethnographic study of interactional adaptation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction: Special issue on: In-Use, In-Situ: Extending Field Research Methods, 22(1 & 2), 37–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Francis, D., & Hester, S.
(2004) An invitation to ethnomethodology: Language, society and interaction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H.
([1967] 1984) Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
(2002) Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Edited by A.W. Rawls. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
(2005) Seeing sociologically: The routine grounds of social action. Edited by A.W. Rawls. Boulder: Paradigm.Google Scholar
(2008) Toward a sociological theory of information. Edited by A.W. Rawls. Boulder: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1963) Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
(1967) Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
(1971) Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
(1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
González, V.M., & Mark, G.
(2005) Managing currents of work: Multi-tasking among multiple collaborations. Ninth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work , Paris, France, 18–22 September 2005, 143–162.
Goodwin, C.
(1984) Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In J.M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 225–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M.H.
(1995) Assembling a response: Setting and collaboratively constructed work talk. In P. ten Have, & G. Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities (pp. 173–186). Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(1996) Transparent vision. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff, & S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 370–404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, M.H.
(1996) Informings and announcements in their environment: Prosody within a multi-activity work setting. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies (pp. 436–461). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haddington, P., & Rauniomaa, M.
(2011) Technologies, multitasking and driving: Attending to and preparing for a mobile phone conversation in the car. Human Communication Research, 37, 223–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haddington, P., Mondada, L., & Nevile, M.
(Eds.) (2013) Interaction and mobility: Language and the body in motion. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haigney, D.E., & Westerman, J.
(2001) Mobile (cellular) phone use and driving: A critical review of research methodology. Ergonomics, 44(2), 132–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P.
(2010) Video in qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Heath, C., & Luff, P.
(1992) Collaboration and control: Crisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground line control rooms. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1(1), 24–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Convergent activities: Line control and passenger information on the London Underground. In Y. Engeström, & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 96–129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Technology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J.
(1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J., & Maynard, D.W.
(Eds.) (2006) Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R.
(2008) Conversation analysis(2nded.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G.
(1972) Side sequences. In D.N. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 294–338). New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, B.S., Skov, M.B., & Thiruravichandran, N.
(2010) Studying driver attention and behaviour for three configurations of GPS navigation in real traffic driving. CHI ‘10 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1271–1280). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
Kalish, B.J., & Aebersold, M.
(2010) Interruptions and multitasking in nursing care. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 36(3), 126–132.Google Scholar
Kenyon, S.
(2008) Internet use and time use: The importance of multitasking. Time & Society, 17, 283–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Measuring multitasking: Methodological questions in time use research. In Proc. TRB 89th Annual meeting 2010, 10–16 January 2010. Washington DC, USA.
Kenyon, S., & Lyons, G.
(2007) Introducing multitasking to the study of travel and ICT: Examining its extent and assessing its potential importance. Transportation Part A41(2), 161–175.Google Scholar
Kirsh, D.
(1995) The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73, 31–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) The context of work. Human Computer Interaction, 16, 305–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lahlou, S.
(2000) Attracteurs cognitifs et travail de bureau [Cognitive attractors and office work]. Intellectica, 30, 75–113.Google Scholar
Law, A.S., Logie, R.H., Pearson, D.G., Cantagallo, A., Moretti, E., & Dimarco, F.
(2004) Resistance to the impact of interruptions during multitasking by healthy adults and dysexecutive patients. Acta Psychologica, 116, 285–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laurier, E.
(2002) Notes on dividing the attention of a car driver. Team Ethno Online, 1. Retreived March 2, 2014, from http://​www​.teamethno​-online​.org​.uk​/Issue1​/Laurier​/gooddriv​.htmlGoogle Scholar
(2004) Doing office work on the motorway. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(4/5), 261–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Searching for a parking space. Intellectica, 41–42(2–3), 101–116.Google Scholar
LeBaron, C.D., & Jones, S.E.
(2002) Closing up closings: Showing the relevance of the social and material surround to the completion of interaction. Journal of Communication, 52(3), 542–565. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levy, M., & Gardner, R.
(2012) Liminality in multitasking: Where talk and task collide in computer collaborations. Language in Society, 41(5), 557–587. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loukopoulos, L.D., Dismukes, R.K., & Barshi, I.
(2009) The multitasking myth: Handling complexity in real-world operations. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Luff, P., Heath, C., Kuzuoka, H., Hindmarsh, J., Keiichi, Y., & Shinya, O.
(2003) Fractured ecologies: Creating environments for collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction, 18(1), 51–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McIlvenny, P., Broth, M., & Haddington, P.
(Eds.) (2009) Communicating place, space and mobility.Special Issue for Journal of Pragmatics, 41(10).Google Scholar
Mondada, L.
(2003) Working with video: How surgeons produce video records of their actions, Visual Studies, 18(1), 58–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Multiactivité, multimodalité et séquentialité: l’initiation de cours d’action parallèles en contexte scolaire [Multiactivity, multimodality and sequentiality: Initiating a parallel course of action in the school context]. In M.-C. Guernier, V. Durand-Guerrier, & J.-P. Sautot (Eds.). Interactions verbales, didactique et apprentissage [Verbal interaction, teaching and learning]. (pp. 45–72). Besançon: Presses Universitaires de Franche Comté.Google Scholar
(2008) Using video for a sequential and multimodal analysis of social interaction: Videotaping institutional telephone calls. [88 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), Art. 39. Retrieved March 2, 2014, from http://​nbn​-resolving​.de​/urn:nbn:de:0114​-fqs0803390Google Scholar
(2011) The organization of concurrent courses of action in surgical demonstrations. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. (pp. 207–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Talking and driving: Multi-activity in the car. Semiotica, 191, 223–256.Google Scholar
Nevile, M.
(2004) Beyond the black box: Talk-in-interaction in the airline cockpit. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
(2009) “You are well clear of friendlies”: Diagnostic error and cooperative work in an Iraq War friendly fire incident. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 18, 147–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Interaction as distraction in driving: A body of evidence. Semiotica, 191, 169–196.Google Scholar
Nevile, M., & Haddington, P.
(2010) In-car distractions and their impact on driving activities. Canberra: Department of Infrastructure and Transport, Australian Commonwealth Government.Google Scholar
Nevile, M., Haddington, P., Heinemann, T., & Rauniomaa, M.
(Eds.) (2014) Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pasquandrea, S.
(2011) Managing multiple actions through multimodality: Doctors’ involvement in interpreter-mediated interactions. Language in Society, 40, 455–481. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Patten, C.J.D., Kircher, A., Östlund, J., & Nilsson, L.
(2004) Using mobile telephones: Cognitive workload and attention resource allocation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36, 341–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Psathas, G.
(1995) Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Rogers, R. & Monsell, S.
(1995) The costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, J.S., Meyer, D.E., & Evans, J.E.
(2001) Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(4), 763–797. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1992) Lectures on conversation [1964–1972] (Vol. 1 & 2). Edited by Gail Jefferson. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G.
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salvucci, D.D., & Taatgen, N.A.
(2011) The multitasking mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Strayer, D.L., Medeiros-Ward, N., & Watson, J.M.
(2013) Who multi-tasks and why? Multi-tasking ability, perceived multi-tasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking. PLoS ONE, 8(1): e54402. Crossref.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A.
(1998) Body torque. Social Research, 65(3), 535–596.Google Scholar
(2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.A., & Sacks, H.
(1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica, 7(4), 289–327.Google Scholar
Schenkein, J.
(1978) Sketch of an analytic mentality for the study of conversational interaction. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T.
(2012) The handbook of conversation analysis. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, D.
(1998) Harvey Sacks: Social science and conversation analysis. Oxford: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Strayer, D.L., & Drews, F.A.
(2007) Multitasking in the automobile. In Kramer, A.F., Wiegmann, D., & Kirlik, A. (Eds.), Attention: From theory to practice (pp. 121–133). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strayer, D.L., Watson, J.M., & Drews, F.A.
(2011) Cognitive distraction while multitasking in the automobile. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 29–58). Burlington: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C.
(2011) Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suchman, L.A.
(1997) Centers of coordination: A case and some themes. In L.B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 41–62). Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
ten Have, P.
(2007) Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. (2nd ed.) London: Sage.Google Scholar
Toerien, M., & Kitzinger, C.
(2007) Emotional labour in action: Navigating multiple involvements in the beauty salon. Sociology41(4), 645–662. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Urry, J.
(2006) Inhabiting the car. In S. Böhm, C. Jones, C. Land, & M. Paterson (Eds.), Against automobility (pp. 17–31). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wooffitt, R.
(2005) Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: A comparative and critical introduction. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Arano, Yusuke
2020. Doing reflecting: Embodied solitary confirmation of instructed enactment. Discourse Studies 22:3  pp. 261 ff. Crossref logo
Arminen, Ilkka, Christian Licoppe & Anna Spagnolli
2016. Respecifying Mediated Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:4  pp. 290 ff. Crossref logo
Cekaite, Asta
2015. The Coordination of Talk and Touch in Adults’ Directives to Children: Touch and Social Control. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48:2  pp. 152 ff. Crossref logo
DiDomenico, Stephen M., Joshua Raclaw & Jessica S. Robles
2020. Attending to the Mobile Text Summons: Managing Multiple Communicative Activities Across Physically Copresent and Technologically Mediated Interpersonal Interactions. Communication Research 47:5  pp. 669 ff. Crossref logo
Fomin, Ivan V. & Mikhail V. Ilyin
2019. Social Semiotics: Paths towards Integrating Social and Semiotic Knowledge. Sociological Journal 25:4  pp. 123 ff. Crossref logo
Harjunpää, Katariina, Lorenza Mondada & Kimmo Svinhufvud
2018. The Coordinated Entry into Service Encounters in Food Shops: Managing Interactional Space, Availability, and Service During Openings. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51:3  pp. 271 ff. Crossref logo
Kamunen, Antti
2019. How to Disengage: Suspension, Body Torque, and Repair. Research on Language and Social Interaction 52:4  pp. 406 ff. Crossref logo
Lefebvre, Augustin
2016. The coordination of moves in Aikido interaction. Gesture 15:2  pp. 123 ff. Crossref logo
Luke, K.K.
2016. Storytelling in multiple contexts. Chinese Language and Discourse 7:2  pp. 297 ff. Crossref logo
Nielsen, Søren Beck
2016. How Doctors Manage Consulting Computer Records While Interacting With Patients. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:1  pp. 58 ff. Crossref logo
Nishizaka, Aug & Masafumi Sunaga
2015. Conversing While Massaging: Multidimensional Asymmetries of Multiple Activities in Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48:2  pp. 200 ff. Crossref logo
Nissi, Riikka & Pekka Pälli
2020. Textual artefacts at the centre of sensemaking: The use of discursive-material resources in constructing joint understanding in organisational workshops. Discourse Studies 22:2  pp. 123 ff. Crossref logo
Olin-Scheller, Christina, Marie Tanner, Stig-Börje Asplund, Janne Kontio & Peter Wikström
2020. Social Excursions During the In-between Spaces of Lessons. Students’ Smartphone Use in the Upper Secondary School Classroom. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Oshima, Sae & Birte Asmuß
2018. Mediated business: living the organizational surroundings – introduction. Culture and Organization 24:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Svinhufvud, Kimmo
2016. Nodding and note-taking: Multimodal analysis of writing and nodding in student counseling interaction. Language and Dialogue 6:1  pp. 81 ff. Crossref logo
Yamauchi, Yutaka & Takeshi Hiramoto
2020. Performative Achievement of Routine Recognizability: An Analysis of Order Taking Routines at Sushi Bars. Journal of Management Studies Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.