Cover not available
Part of
Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond multitasking
Edited by Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada and Maurice Nevile
[Not in series 187] 2014
► pp. 3–32

Towards multiactivity as a social and interactional phenomenon

 | University of Oulu
 | University of Oulu
ORCID logo | University of Basel
 | University of Southern Denmark
Multiactivity – the different ways in which two or more activities can be intertwined and made co-relevant in social interaction – is an inseparable element of everyday life. At the same time it is a little understood form of human conduct. This introductory chapter builds on the basis that multiactivity is a social, verbal and embodied phenomenon, manifest in people’s participation and conduct in interaction, and can be studied empirically by relying on the close analysis of video-recorded data of naturally occurring situations. The chapter connects to previous research on multitasking and outlines how an interactional and social view of the phenomenon can add to our knowledge of how participants engage in, manage and accomplish multiple activities. The chapter outlines new interactional practices and new concepts to describe them.
Published online: 4 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.187.01had
References (83)
Arminen, I. (2005). Institutional interaction: Studies of talk at work. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Baron, N.S. (2008). Adjusting the volume: Technology and multitasking in discourse control. Mobile Communication Studies, 177–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bittman, M., & Wajcman, J. (2000). The rush hour: The character of leisure time and gender equity. Social Forces, 79(1), 165–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broth, M. (2009). Seeing through screens, hearing through speakers: Managing distant studio space in television control room interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1998–2016. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Datchary, C., & Licoppe, C. (2007). La multi-activité et ses appuis: l’exemple de la “présence obstinée” des messages dans l’environnement de travail [Supporting multiactivity: The example of “stubborn presence” messages in the work environment]. Activités, 4(1), 4–29.Google Scholar
Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Egbert, M. (1997). Schisming: The collaborative transformation from a single conversation to multiple conversations. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30(1), 1–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esbjörnsson, M., Juhlin, O., & Weilenmann, A. (2007). Drivers using mobile phones in traffic: An ethnographic study of interactional adaptation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction: Special issue on: In-Use, In-Situ: Extending Field Research Methods, 22(1 & 2), 37–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francis, D., & Hester, S. (2004). An invitation to ethnomethodology: Language, society and interaction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. ([1967] 1984). Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Edited by A.W. Rawls. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
. (2005). Seeing sociologically: The routine grounds of social action. Edited by A.W. Rawls. Boulder: Paradigm.Google Scholar
. (2008). Toward a sociological theory of information. Edited by A.W. Rawls. Boulder: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
González, V.M., & Mark, G. (2005). Managing currents of work: Multi-tasking among multiple collaborations. Ninth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work , Paris, France, 18–22 September 2005, 143–162.
Goodwin, C. (1984). Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In J.M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 225–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M.H. (1995). Assembling a response: Setting and collaboratively constructed work talk. In P. ten Have, & G. Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities (pp. 173–186). Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1996). Transparent vision. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff, & S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 370–404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, M.H. (1996). Informings and announcements in their environment: Prosody within a multi-activity work setting. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies (pp. 436–461). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haddington, P., & Rauniomaa, M. (2011). Technologies, multitasking and driving: Attending to and preparing for a mobile phone conversation in the car. Human Communication Research, 37, 223–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haddington, P., Mondada, L., & Nevile, M. (Eds.). (2013). Interaction and mobility: Language and the body in motion. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haigney, D.E., & Westerman, J. (2001). Mobile (cellular) phone use and driving: A critical review of research methodology. Ergonomics, 44(2), 132–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1992). Collaboration and control: Crisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground line control rooms. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1(1), 24–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1996). Convergent activities: Line control and passenger information on the London Underground. In Y. Engeström, & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 96–129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2000). Technology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J., & Maynard, D.W. (Eds.). (2006). Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis(2nded.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1972). Side sequences. In D.N. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 294–338). New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, B.S., Skov, M.B., & Thiruravichandran, N. (2010). Studying driver attention and behaviour for three configurations of GPS navigation in real traffic driving. CHI ‘10 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1271–1280). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
Kalish, B.J., & Aebersold, M. (2010). Interruptions and multitasking in nursing care. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 36(3), 126–132.Google Scholar
Kenyon, S. (2008). Internet use and time use: The importance of multitasking. Time & Society, 17, 283–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2010). Measuring multitasking: Methodological questions in time use research. In Proc. TRB 89th Annual meeting 2010, 10–16 January 2010. Washington DC, USA.
Kenyon, S., & Lyons, G. (2007). Introducing multitasking to the study of travel and ICT: Examining its extent and assessing its potential importance. Transportation Part A41(2), 161–175.Google Scholar
Kirsh, D. (1995). The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73, 31–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2001). The context of work. Human Computer Interaction, 16, 305–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lahlou, S. (2000). Attracteurs cognitifs et travail de bureau [Cognitive attractors and office work]. Intellectica, 30, 75–113.Google Scholar
Law, A.S., Logie, R.H., Pearson, D.G., Cantagallo, A., Moretti, E., & Dimarco, F. (2004). Resistance to the impact of interruptions during multitasking by healthy adults and dysexecutive patients. Acta Psychologica, 116, 285–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laurier, E. (2002). Notes on dividing the attention of a car driver. Team Ethno Online, 1. Retreived March 2, 2014, from [URL]Google Scholar
. (2004). Doing office work on the motorway. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(4/5), 261–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2005). Searching for a parking space. Intellectica, 41–42(2–3), 101–116.Google Scholar
LeBaron, C.D., & Jones, S.E. (2002). Closing up closings: Showing the relevance of the social and material surround to the completion of interaction. Journal of Communication, 52(3), 542–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levy, M., & Gardner, R. (2012). Liminality in multitasking: Where talk and task collide in computer collaborations. Language in Society, 41(5), 557–587. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loukopoulos, L.D., Dismukes, R.K., & Barshi, I. (2009). The multitasking myth: Handling complexity in real-world operations. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Luff, P., Heath, C., Kuzuoka, H., Hindmarsh, J., Keiichi, Y., & Shinya, O. (2003). Fractured ecologies: Creating environments for collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction, 18(1), 51–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McIlvenny, P., Broth, M., & Haddington, P. (Eds.). (2009). Communicating place, space and mobility.Special Issue for Journal of Pragmatics, 41(10).Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2003). Working with video: How surgeons produce video records of their actions, Visual Studies, 18(1), 58–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2006). Multiactivité, multimodalité et séquentialité: l’initiation de cours d’action parallèles en contexte scolaire [Multiactivity, multimodality and sequentiality: Initiating a parallel course of action in the school context]. In M.-C. Guernier, V. Durand-Guerrier, & J.-P. Sautot (Eds.). Interactions verbales, didactique et apprentissage [Verbal interaction, teaching and learning]. (pp. 45–72). Besançon: Presses Universitaires de Franche Comté.Google Scholar
. (2008). Using video for a sequential and multimodal analysis of social interaction: Videotaping institutional telephone calls. [88 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), Art. 39. Retrieved March 2, 2014, from [URL]Google Scholar
. (2011). The organization of concurrent courses of action in surgical demonstrations. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. (pp. 207–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. (2012). Talking and driving: Multi-activity in the car. Semiotica, 191, 223–256.Google Scholar
Nevile, M. (2004). Beyond the black box: Talk-in-interaction in the airline cockpit. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
. (2009). “You are well clear of friendlies”: Diagnostic error and cooperative work in an Iraq War friendly fire incident. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 18, 147–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012). Interaction as distraction in driving: A body of evidence. Semiotica, 191, 169–196.Google Scholar
Nevile, M., & Haddington, P. (2010). In-car distractions and their impact on driving activities. Canberra: Department of Infrastructure and Transport, Australian Commonwealth Government.Google Scholar
Nevile, M., Haddington, P., Heinemann, T., & Rauniomaa, M. (Eds.). (2014). Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pasquandrea, S. (2011). Managing multiple actions through multimodality: Doctors’ involvement in interpreter-mediated interactions. Language in Society, 40, 455–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patten, C.J.D., Kircher, A., Östlund, J., & Nilsson, L. (2004). Using mobile telephones: Cognitive workload and attention resource allocation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36, 341–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Rogers, R. & Monsell, S. (1995). The costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, J.S., Meyer, D.E., & Evans, J.E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(4), 763–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation [1964–1972] (Vol. 1 & 2). Edited by Gail Jefferson. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salvucci, D.D., & Taatgen, N.A. (2011). The multitasking mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Strayer, D.L., Medeiros-Ward, N., & Watson, J.M. (2013). Who multi-tasks and why? Multi-tasking ability, perceived multi-tasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking. PLoS ONE, 8(1): e54402. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A. (1998). Body torque. Social Research, 65(3), 535–596.Google Scholar
. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 7(4), 289–327.Google Scholar
Schenkein, J. (1978). Sketch of an analytic mentality for the study of conversational interaction. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (2012). The handbook of conversation analysis. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverman, D. (1998). Harvey Sacks: Social science and conversation analysis. Oxford: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Strayer, D.L., & Drews, F.A. (2007). Multitasking in the automobile. In Kramer, A.F., Wiegmann, D., & Kirlik, A. (Eds.), Attention: From theory to practice (pp. 121–133). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strayer, D.L., Watson, J.M., & Drews, F.A. (2011). Cognitive distraction while multitasking in the automobile. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 29–58). Burlington: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (2011). Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suchman, L.A. (1997). Centers of coordination: A case and some themes. In L.B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 41–62). Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. (2nd ed.) London: Sage.Google Scholar
Toerien, M., & Kitzinger, C. (2007). Emotional labour in action: Navigating multiple involvements in the beauty salon. Sociology41(4), 645–662. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Urry, J. (2006). Inhabiting the car. In S. Böhm, C. Jones, C. Land, & M. Paterson (Eds.), Against automobility (pp. 17–31). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: A comparative and critical introduction. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Cited by (32)

Cited by 32 other publications

Song, Le & Zhegong Shangguan
2024. ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences, ► pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
Avgustis, Iuliia & Florence Oloff
2023. Getting (Others) Involved with Smartphones: Participation in Showing Sequences in Multiparty Settings. In Complexity of Interaction, ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Ditchfield, Hannah
2023. Spinning interactional plates: Managing multicommunication behind the screen of Facebook. Discourse & Communication 17:4 ► pp. 397 ff. DOI logo
Du Bois, Inke
2023. Inside the commentator’s booth: a Multimodal (Inter)action and Conversation Analysis on the production of first division football commentary on TV. Multimodal Communication 12:2 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Kohonen-Aho, Laura
2023. Transitions Between Interactional Spaces: Working Towards Shared Understanding in a Hybrid Workshop Setting. In Complexity of Interaction, ► pp. 457 ff. DOI logo
Krug, Maximilian
2023. Overcoming Blanking: Verbal and Visual Features of Prompting in Theatre Rehearsals. Human Studies 46:2 ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Vatanen, Anna
2023. Embodied Noticings as Repair Initiations: On Multiactivity in Choir Rehearsals. In Complexity of Interaction, ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Vatanen, Anna & Pentti Haddington
2023. Multiactivity in adult-child interaction: accounts resolving conflicting courses of action in request sequences. Text & Talk 43:2 ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Lehtimaja, Inkeri & Salla Kurhila
2022. Practices of patient participation: Getting a turn during hospital ward rounds. Discourse Studies 24:1 ► pp. 24 ff. DOI logo
Wakke, Denise & Vivien Heller
2022. Helping as a Concurrent Activity: How Students Engage in Small Groups While Pursuing Classroom Tasks. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Helmer, Henrike
2021. Humorous or occasioned instructions: Learning the “shoulder check” in theoretical and practical driving lessons. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 31:1 ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Olin-Scheller, Christina, Marie Tanner, Stig-Börje Asplund, Janne Kontio & Peter Wikström
2021. Social Excursions During the In-between Spaces of Lessons. Students’ Smartphone Use in the Upper Secondary School Classroom. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 65:4 ► pp. 615 ff. DOI logo
Rauniomaa, Mirka, Tiina Keisanen & Pauliina Siitonen
2021. Shared understandings of the human–nature relationship in encounters with small wildlife. In Intersubjectivity in Action [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 326], ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Robles, Jessica S., Stephen M. DiDomenico & Joshua Raclaw
2021. Chapter 2.1. Using objects and technologies in the immediate environment as resources for managing affect displays in troubles talk. In How Emotions Are Made in Talk [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 321], ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Tuncer, Sylvaine, Oskar Lindwall & Barry Brown
2021. Making Time: Pausing to Coordinate Video Instructions and Practical Tasks. Symbolic Interaction 44:3 ► pp. 603 ff. DOI logo
Ursi, Biagio
2021. Le texte programmateur à l’épreuve des pratiques : une étude interactionnelle de la mobilisation de recettes de cuisine en situation. Langages N° 221:1 ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Arano, Yusuke
2020. Doing reflecting: Embodied solitary confirmation of instructed enactment. Discourse Studies 22:3 ► pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
DiDomenico, Stephen M., Joshua Raclaw & Jessica S. Robles
2020. Attending to the Mobile Text Summons: Managing Multiple Communicative Activities Across Physically Copresent and Technologically Mediated Interpersonal Interactions. Communication Research 47:5 ► pp. 669 ff. DOI logo
Hoey, Elliott M.
2020. When Conversation Lapses, DOI logo
Nissi, Riikka & Pekka Pälli
2020. Textual artefacts at the centre of sensemaking: The use of discursive-material resources in constructing joint understanding in organisational workshops. Discourse Studies 22:2 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Yamauchi, Yutaka & Takeshi Hiramoto
2020. Performative Achievement of Routine Recognizability: An Analysis of Order Taking Routines at Sushi Bars. Journal of Management Studies 57:8 ► pp. 1610 ff. DOI logo
Boström, Eva & Stina Öresland
2019. The (in)visible ‘mother’: Diabetes specialist nurses in Swedish primary healthcare. Nordic Journal of Nursing Research 39:1 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Fomin, Ivan V. & Mikhail V. Ilyin
2019. Social Semiotics: Paths towards Integrating Social and Semiotic Knowledge. Sociological Journal 25:4 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Kamunen, Antti
2019. How to Disengage: Suspension, Body Torque, and Repair. Research on Language and Social Interaction 52:4 ► pp. 406 ff. DOI logo
Harjunpää, Katariina, Lorenza Mondada & Kimmo Svinhufvud
2018. The Coordinated Entry into Service Encounters in Food Shops: Managing Interactional Space, Availability, and Service During Openings. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51:3 ► pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Oshima, Sae & Birte Asmuß
2018. Mediated business: living the organizational surroundings – introduction. Culture and Organization 24:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Arminen, Ilkka, Christian Licoppe & Anna Spagnolli
2016. Respecifying Mediated Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:4 ► pp. 290 ff. DOI logo
Lefebvre, Augustin
2016. The coordination of moves in Aikido interaction. Gesture 15:2 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Luke, K.K.
2016. Storytelling in multiple contexts. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 7:2 ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Nielsen, Søren Beck
2016. How Doctors Manage Consulting Computer Records While Interacting With Patients. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:1 ► pp. 58 ff. DOI logo
Svinhufvud, Kimmo
2016. Nodding and note-taking. Language and Dialogue 6:1 ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Cekaite, Asta
2015. The Coordination of Talk and Touch in Adults’ Directives to Children: Touch and Social Control. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48:2 ► pp. 152 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.