Cover not available
Part of
From Gesture in Conversation to Visible Action as Utterance: Essays in honor of Adam Kendon
Edited by Mandana Seyfeddinipur and Marianne Gullberg
[Not in series 188] 2014
► pp. 127–152

Gesture as “deliberate expressive movement”

This chapter offers an in-depth exploration into one of Adam Kendon‘s core theoretical assumptions: gesture as “deliberate expressive movement.” Gestures are recognized as such because they show certain characteristic features of form, because they have “features of manifest deliberate expressiveness” (Kendon 2004: 13–14, italics in the original). Kendon bases his definition of gestures on their articulatory movement characteristics and on their interactive perception. Following Kendon’s descriptive approach, and by taking the form characteristics of gestures as a theoretical and methodological point of departure, a form-based and linguistic perspective to a grammar of gesture will be outlined. In doing so and by alluding to the study of signs it will be suggested that the study of gestures reveals how linguistic structures may emerge from body movement.

Published online: 6 August 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.188.07mul
References
Andrén, Mats
2010 Children’s Gestures from 18 to 30 Months. Ph.D. dissertation. Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University.
Barsalou, Lawrence W
2008 “Grounded Cognition.” The Annual Review of Psychology 59: 617–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartenieff, Irmgard, and Lewis, Dori
1980 Body Movement: Coping with the Environment. New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Kirsten, Aksu, Volkan, and Kopp, Stefan
2011 “The Relation of Speech and Gestures: Temporal Synchrony Follows Semantic Synchrony.” Workshop on Gesture and Speech in Interaction Proceedings of the 2nd (GeSpIn 2011) .
Bergmann, Kirsten, Kahl, Sebastian, and Kopp, Stefan
2013 “Modelling the semantic coordination of speech and gesture under cognitive and linguistic constraints.” In Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Intelligent Virtual Agents, Ruth Aylett, Brigitte Krenn, Catherine Pelachaud and Hiroshi Shimodaira (eds), 203–216. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, Kirsten and Kopp, Stefan
2006 “Verbal or visual: How information is distributed across speech and gesture in spatial dialogue.” In Proceedings of the 110th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue , David Schlangen and Raquel Fernandez (eds), 90–97.
Bressem, Jana
2012 Repetitions in Gesture: Structures, Functions, and Cognitive Aspects. Ph.D. dissertation, European University Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder).
Bressem, Jana, and Müller, Cornelia
2014a “A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.2.), Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill and Jana Bressem (eds), 1575–1591. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2014b b“The family of Away gestures: Negation, Refusal and Negative Assessment” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.2.), Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill and Jana Bressem (eds), 1592–1604. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl
2011 Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calbris, Geneviève
1990 The Semiotics of French Gesture. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
2011 Elements of Meaning in Gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, Alan
2012 “Usage events of spoken language and the symbolic units (may) abstract from them.” In Cognitive Processes in Language, Krzystzof Kosecki and Janusz Badio (eds), 149–158. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cohen, Einya, Namir, Lila, and Schlesinger, I.M
1977 A New Dictionary of Sign Language: Employing the Eshkol-Wachmann Movement Notation System. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Condon, Wiliam C. and Ogston, Richard
1966 “Sound film analysis of normal and pathological behavior patterns.” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 143: 338–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Jorio, Andrea
2000 Gesture in Naples and Gesture in Classical Antiquity. A translation of La mimica degli antichi investigate nel gestire napoletano (1832), and with an Introduction and Notes, by Adam Kendon. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fricke, Ellen
2012 Grammatik Multimodal: Wie Wörter und Gesten zusammenwirken. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Towards a unified grammar of gesture and speech: A multimodal approach.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.1), Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill and Sedinha Teßendorf (eds), 202–217. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1974 Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Simon
2009 Grammar, Gesture, and Cognition: The Case of Negation in English. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Michel de Montaigne, Bordeaux 3.
2008 “Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 15/3: 495–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kappelhoff, Hermann, and Müller, Cornelia
2011 “Embodied meaning construction: Multimodal metaphor and expressive movement in speech, gesture and feature film.” Metaphor in the Social World 1 (2): 121–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam
1972 “Some relationships between body motion and speech. An analysis of an example.” In Studies in Nonverbal Communication, Aaron Siegman, and Benjamin Pope (eds), 177–210. Elmsford New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
1980a “Gesticulation and speech. Two aspects of the process of utterance.” In The Relationship of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication, Mary Ritchie Key (ed.), 207–227. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1980b “A description of a deaf-mute sign language from the Enga Province of Papua New Guinea with some comparative discussion. Part I: The formational properties of Enga signs.” Semiotica 32: 1–32. “Part II: The semiotic functioning of Enga signs.” Semiotica 32: 81–117. “Part III: Aspects of utterance construction.” Semiotica 32: 245–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988 Sign Languages of Aboriginal Australia: Cultural, Semiotic and Communicative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1990 Conducting Interaction. Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. ­Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2004 Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kopp, Stefan, Bergmann, Kirsten, and Kahl, Sebastian
2013 “A spreading-activation model of the semantic coordination of speech and gesture.” Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2013) , 823–828. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Kopp, Stefan, Bergmann, Kirsten, and Wachsmuth, I
2008 “Multimodal communication from multimodal thinking – towards an integrated model of speech and gesture production.” Semantic Computing 2 (1): 115–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laban, Rudolf, and Lawrence, F.C
1947 Effort. London: Macdonald and Evans.Google Scholar
Ladewig, Silva H
2010 “Beschreiben, suchen und auffordern – Varianten einer rekurrenten Geste.” Sprache und Literatur 41: 89–111.Google Scholar
2011 “Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive bases.” CogniTextes 6. [URL].Google Scholar
2012 Syntactic and Semantic Integration of Gesture into Speech: Structural, Cognitive, and Conceptual Aspects. Ph.D. dissertation, European University Frankfurt (Oder).
Langacker, Ronald W
1991 Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. ­Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lapaire, Jean-Remi
2006 “Negation, reification and manipulation in a cognitive grammar of substance.” In La Négation, Stéphanie Bonnefille and Sebastian Salbayre (eds), 333–349. Tours: Les Cahiers du GRAAT n 35.Google Scholar
Mandel, Mark
1977 “Iconic devices in American Sign Language.” In On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language, Lynn A. Friedman (ed.), 57–107. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, David
1992 Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mittelberg, Irene
2006 Metaphor and metonymy in language and gesture: Discoursive evidence for multimodal models of grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, New York.
2013 “The exbodied mind: Cognitive-semiotic principles as motivating forces in gesture.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.1), Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill and Sedinha Teßendorf (eds), 702–728. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Morris, Desmond
1977 Manwatching: A Field Guide to Human Behavior. London: Jonathan Cape; New York: Harry Abrams.Google Scholar
Morris, Desmond, Peter Collett, Peter Marsh, and Marie O’Shaughnessy
1979 Gestures: Their Origins and Distribution. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia
1998a Redebegleitende Gesten. Kulturgeschichte – Theorie – Sprachvergleich. Berlin: Verlag Arno Spitz.Google Scholar
1998b “Iconicity and gesture.” In Oralité et gestualité: Communication Multimodale, Interaction, Christian Cavé, Isabelle Guaitella and Serge Santi (eds), 321–328. Montréal/Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
2004 “Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand. A case of a gesture family?” In The Semantics and Pragmatics of Everyday Gestures, Roland Posner and Cornelia Müller (eds), 234–256. Berlin: Weidler Verlag.Google Scholar
2009 “Gesture and language.” In The Linguistic Encyclopedia, Kirsten ­Malmkjaer (ed.), 214–217. Abington/ New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2010 “Wie Gesten bedeuten. Eine kognitiv-linguistische und sequenzanalytische Perspektive.” Sprache und Gestik. Sonderheft der Zeitschrift Sprache und Literatur 41(1): 37–68.Google Scholar
2013 “Gestures as a medium of expression: The linguistic potential of gestures.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.1), Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill and Sedinha Teßendorf (eds), 202–217. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2014 “Gestural modes of representation as techniques of depiction.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.2), Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill and Jana Bressem (eds), 1687–1702. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia, Bressem, Jana, and Ladewig, Silva H
2013 “Towards a grammar of gestures: a form-based view.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication ­Science 38.1), Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill and Sedinha Teßendorf (eds), 702–728. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia, and Haferland, Harald
1997 “Gefesselte Hände: Zur Semiose performativer Gesten.” Mitteilungen des Germanistenverbandes 3: 29–53.Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia, and Ladewig, Silva H
2014 “Metaphors for sensorimotor experiences: Gestures as embodied and dynamic conceptualizations of balance in dance lessons.” In Language and the Creative Mind, CSDL volume, Michael Borkent, Barbara Dancygier and Jennifer Hinnel (eds), 295–323. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia, Ladewig, Silva H., and Bressem, Jana
2013 “Gestures and speech from a linguistic perspective: A new field and its history.” In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.1), Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill and Sedinha Teßendorf (eds), 55–81. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia and Tag, Susanne
2010 “The dynamics of metaphor. Foregrounding and activating metaphoricity in conversational interaction.” Cognitive Semiotics 6: 85–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulvermüller, F
1999 “Words in the brain’s language.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 253–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, Günter, Michael Köpcke, Thomas Berg, and Peter Siemund
2007 “Introduction: The construction of meaning in language.” In Aspects of Meaning Construction, Günter Radden, Michael Köpcke, Thomas Berg, and Peter Siemund (eds), 1–15. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rieser, Hannes, Bergmann, Kirsten, and Kopp, Stefan
2012 “How do iconic gestures convey visuo-spatial information? Bringing together empirical, theoretical, and simulation studies.” In Gestures in Embodied Communication and Human-Computer Interaction, E. Efthimiou­ and G. Kouroupetroglou (eds), 139–150. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sowa, Timo
2005 Understanding coverbal iconic gestures in object shape descriptions. Ph.D. dissertation. Berlin: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.
Streeck, Jürgen
1994 “Speech-handling: The metaphorical representation of speech in gestures. A cross-cultural study.” Manuscript. Austin, Texas.
2008 “Depicting by gesture.” Gesture 8 (3): 285–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Gesturecraft: Manufacturing Shared Understanding. Amsterdam/NewYork: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taub, Sarah F
2001 Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teßendorf, Sedinha
2008 “From everyday action to gestural performance: Metonymic motivations of a pragmatic gesture.” Presentation at the Seventh International Conference on Researching Metaphor (RaAM7) , Cáceres (Spain).
Wilcox, Sherman
2009 “From symptom to symbol: Routes from gesture to signed language.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7: 89–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wundt, Wilhelm
1921 Völkerpsychologie: Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte. Erster Band. Die Sprache. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Bressem, Jana & Cornelia Müller
2017. The “Negative-Assessment-Construction” – A multimodal pattern based on a recurrent gesture?. Linguistics Vanguard 3:s1 DOI logo
Harrison, Simon & Silva H. Ladewig
2021. Recurrent gestures throughout bodies, languages, and cultural practices. Gesture 20:2 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Kosmala, Loulou
2022. Exploring the status of filled pauses as pragmatic markers. Pragmatics & Cognition 29:2 ► pp. 272 ff. DOI logo
Kraśnicka, Izabela
2020. Meaning in multisemiotic messages – functions of gestures accompanying speech as elements of utterance structure. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :31(4) ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
McNeill, David
2014. Gesture–speech unity. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 5:2 ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Poignant, Elisabeth
2021. The cross-lingual shaping of narrative landscapes: involvement in interpreted story telling. Perspectives 29:6 ► pp. 814 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2024. Beyond Disfluency [Advances in Interaction Studies, 11], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.