Cover not available
Part of
From Gesture in Conversation to Visible Action as Utterance: Essays in honor of Adam Kendon
Edited by Mandana Seyfeddinipur and Marianne Gullberg
[Not in series 188] 2014
► pp. 245–288

Different strokes

Gesture phrases and gesture units in a family homesign from Chiapas, Mexico

Kendon’s foundational proposals about the phrasing of gesture are applied to the emerging syntax of the multimodal utterances in “Z,” a first-generation sign language emerging among three deaf siblings and their hearing-age mates in an indigenous Mexican community. I build on the composition and dynamics of Kendon’s “gesture units” to formalize a productive phrase-structure grammar for Z, and to highlight areas where the linguistic needs of signers apparently elaborate on this grammar and both extend and regiment it to produce phrasal and clausal units. Questions about “strokes,” different sorts of juncture, and interactive constraints on conversational signing elucidate possible links between gesture and sign and potentially shed light on the nature and origins of language itself.

Published online: 6 August 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.188.12hav
References
Chen, Lei, Mary Harper, and Francis Quek
2002 “Gesture patterns during speech repairs.” Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI’02) , 155–160. DOI logo
Feldman, Heidi, Susan Goldin-Meadow, and L. Gleitman
1978 “Beyond Herodotus: the creation of language by linguistically deprived deaf children.” In Action, Symbol, and Gesture: The Emergence of Language, Andrew Lock (ed.), 351–414. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lynn A
1976 Phonology of a Soundless Language: Phonological Structure of the American Sign Language. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Goldin-Meadow, Susan
1993 “When does gesture become language? A study of gesture used as a primary communication system by deaf children of hearing parents.” In Talk, Language, and Cognition in Human Language, Kathleen Rita Gibson and Tim Ingold (eds), 63–85. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2003 The Resilience of Language. New York/Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Haviland, John B
2011 “Nouns, verbs, and constituents in an emerging ‘Tzotzil’ sign language.” In Representing Language: Essays in Honor of Judith Aissen, Rodrigo Gutiérrez-Bravo, Line Mikkelsen and Eric Potsdam (eds), 157–171. California Digital Library eScholarship Repository. Linguistic Research Center, University of California, Santa Cruz. [URL] and [URL].Google Scholar
2013a “Xi to vi: Over that way, look!” (Meta)spatial representation in an emerging (Mayan?) sign language.” In Space in Language and Linguistics, Peter Auer, ­Martin Hilpert, Anja Stukenbrock and Benedikt Szmerecsanyi (eds), 334–400. Berlin/Boston: ­Walter De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2013b “Sign as grammaticalized gesture: The emerging grammar of nouns in a first generation sign language.” Gesture 13(3): 203–247.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. “Hey!” Forthcoming in TopiCS in Cognitive Science (online).
Hockett, Charles F
1958 A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam
1967 Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica 26:1–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1972 “Some relationships between body motion and speech: An analysis of an example.” In Studies in Dyadic Communication, Aaron Seigman and Benjamin Pope (eds), 177–210. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1980a “Gesticulations and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. InThe Relationship of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication, Mary Ritchie Key (ed.), 207–227. The Hague: Mouton & Co.Google Scholar
1980b “A description of a deaf-mute sign language from the Enga Province of Papua New Guinea with some comparative discussion. Part I: The formational properties of Enga signs.” Semiotica 32: 1–32. “Part II: The semiotic function of Enga signs.” Semiotica 32: 81–117. “Part III: Aspects of utterance construction.” Semiotica 32: 245–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984 “Knowledge of sign language in an Australian Aboriginal community.” Journal of Anthropological Research 40: 556–576.Google Scholar
1988 Sign Languages of Aboriginal Australia: Cultural, Semiotic, and Communicative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2004a Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2004b “Contrasts in gesticulation: A Neapolitan and a British speaker compared.” In The Semantics and Pragmatics of Everyday Gesture, Cornelia Mueller and Roland Posner (eds), 173–193. Berlin: Weidler Buchverlag.Google Scholar
Kita, Sotaro
1993 Language and Thought Interface: A Study of Spontaneous Gestures and Japanese Mimetics. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Psychology and Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
McNeill, David
1992 Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2005 Gesture and Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, David, and Susan Duncan
2000 “Growth points in thinking-for-speaking.” In Language and Gesture, David McNeill(ed.), 141–161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo, and Rachel Sutton-Spence
2010 “Limitations on simultaneity in sign language.” Language 86 (3): 647–662. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emmanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language 50: 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Carol Padden, and Mark Aronoff
2005 “The emergence of a grammar: Systematic structure in a new language.” Proceedings of the National Academy of ­Sciences, 102 (7): 2661–2665. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seyfeddinipur, Mandana
2006 Disfluency: Interrupting Speech and Gesture. Ph.D. dissertation, Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen. (MPI series in psycholinguistics #39.)
Stokoe, William C
1960 Sign Language Structure: An Outline of the Visual Communication Systems of the American Deaf (= Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers 8). Buffalo, NY: University of Buffalo.Google Scholar
1978 Sign Language Structure: The First Linguistic Analysis of American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar
West, La Mont, Jr
1960 The Sign Language: An Analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Coelho, Luciana Lopes, Marilda Moraes Garcia Bruno & Miroslava Cruz-Aldrete
2022. Comunidades indígenas e as línguas de sinais. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 22 ► pp. e022016 ff. DOI logo
Haviland, John B.
2015. Hey!. Topics in Cognitive Science 7:1 ► pp. 124 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.