Article published in:
Above and Beyond the Segments: Experimental linguistics and phonetics
Edited by Johanneke Caspers, Yiya Chen, Willemijn Heeren, Jos Pacilly, Niels O. Schiller and Ellen van Zanten
[Not in series 189] 2014
► pp. 96–108

The effect of pause insertion on the intelligibility of Danish among Swedes

| University of Groningen
Scharpff & Van Heuven (1988) have shown that low-quality, synthetic speech is better understood when pauses are inserted at prosodic boundaries. Their study pertains to an L1 situation. In the present paper we test the hypothesis that the positive effect of particular pauses on intelligibility within the same language can be generalized to speech of an unknown but closely related language. We presented long Danish sentences to Swedish listeners in two versions, one without pauses and one with pauses at prosodic boundaries. The results showed that the percentage of correct translations was higher for sentences with pauses than for sentences without pauses, thus confirming our hypothesis.
Published online: 10 December 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.189.08goo
References

References

Basbøll, H.
(2005) The phonology of Danish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bleses, D., & Basbøll, H.
(2004) The Danish sound structure-implications for language acquisition in normal and hearing impaired populations. In E. Schmidt, U. Mikkelsens, I. Post, J.B. Simonsen, & K. Fruensgaard (Eds.), 20th Danavox 2003 Symposium on Brain, Hearing and Learning (pp. 165–190).Google Scholar
Bleses, D., Vache, W., Slott, M., Wehberg, S., Thomsen, P., Madsen, T., & Basbøll, H.
(2008) Early vocabulary development in Danish children: A CDI-based comparison. Journal of Child Language, 35, 619–650. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braunmüller, K., & Zeevaert, L.
(2001) Semikommunikation, rezeptive Mehrsprachigkeit und verwandte Phänomene. Eine bibliographische Bestandsaufnahme,[Arbeiten zur Mehrsprachigkeit, B 19]. Hamburg: SFB 538.Google Scholar
Bruce, G.
(1982) Textual aspects of prosody in Swedish. Phonetica, 39, 274–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, W.E., & Danly, M.
(1981) Segmental and temporal aspects of utterance-final lengthening. Phonetica, 38, 106–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deklaration om nordisk sprogpolitik
(2007) [Declaration on a Nordic Language Policy]. Copenhagen: Nordiska ministerrådet.Google Scholar
Delsing, L.-O., & Lundin Åkesson, K.
(2005) Håller språket ihop Norden? En forskningsrapport om ungdomars förståelse av danska, svenska och norska [Does the language keep the Nordic countries together? A research report on how well young people understand Danish, Swedish and Norwegian]. Copenhagen: Nordiska ministerrådet.Google Scholar
De Rooij, J.J.
(1979) Speech punctuation. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Garcia Lecumberria, M.L., Cooke, M., & Cutler, A.
(2010) Non-native speech perception in adverse conditions: A review. Speech Communication, 52, 864–886. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gooskens, C., van Heuven, V.J., van Bezooijen, R., & Pacilly, J.
(2010) Is spoken Danish less intelligible than Swedish? Speech Communication, 52, 1022–1037. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grønnum Thorsen, N.
(1984) Intonation and text in Standard Danish. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77(3), 185–242.Google Scholar
Grønnum, N.
(2003) Why are the Danes so hard to understand? In H. Galberg Jacobsen, D. Bleses, T.O. Madsen, & P. Thomsen (Eds.), Take Danish-for instance: Linguistic studies in honour of Hans Basbøll presented on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 12 July 2003 (pp. 119–130). Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F.
(1980) Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 267–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, E.
(1966) Semicommunication: The language gap in Scandinavia. Sociological Inquiry, 36(2), 280–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, N.H., Schüppert, A., & Gooskens, C.
(2011) Syllable reduction and articulation rates in Danish, Norwegian and Swedish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 34(2), 215–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klatt, D.H.
(1975a) Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in a connected discourse. Journal of Phonetics, 3, 129–140.Google Scholar
(1975b) The linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 1208–1221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyberg, B.
(1979) Final lengthening – partly a consequence of restrictions on the speed of fundamental frequency change? Journal of Phonetics, 7, 187–196.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W.D.
(1980) Speech understanding as a psychological process. In J.C. Simon (Ed.), Spoken language generation and understanding (pp. 39–67). Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I.
(1986) Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, S.G., Scharpff, P.J.A.M., & van Heuven, V.J.
(1990) Effects of several pausing strategies on the recognisability of words in synthetic speech. Proceedings of the international conference on spoken language processing, Kobe (Japan) 1 (pp. 385–387).
Scharpff, P.J.A.M.
(1994) Het effect van spreekpauzes op de herkenning van woorden in voorgelezen zinnen [The effect of speech pauses on the recognition of words in read sentences]. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Scharpff, P.J.A.M., & van Heuven, V.J.
(1988) Effects of pause insertion on the intelligibility of low quality speech. Proceedings 7th FASE Symposium/Proceedings Speech ’88 (pp. 261–268). Edinburgh: The Institute of Acoustics.Google Scholar
’t Hart, J., Collier, R., & Cohen, A.
(1990) A perceptual study of intonation, an experimental phonetic approach to speech melody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Wang, Hongyan & Vincent J. van Heuven
2015. The Interlanguage Speech Intelligibility Benefit as Bias Toward Native-Language Phonology. i-Perception 6:6 ► pp. 204166951561366 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.