Article published in:
Above and Beyond the Segments: Experimental linguistics and phonetics
Edited by Johanneke Caspers, Yiya Chen, Willemijn Heeren, Jos Pacilly, Niels O. Schiller and Ellen van Zanten
[Not in series 189] 2014
► pp. 174188
References
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D
(2005) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program].
Elsendoorn, B.A.G
(1984) Tolerance of durational properties in British English vowels. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Flege, J.E., & Hillenbrand, J
(1986) Differential use of temporal cues to the /s/–/z/ contrast by native and non-native speakers of English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 708–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lusini, S
(2012) Yes/no question-marking in Italian dialects: A typological, theoretical and experimental approach. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, S.G., Brokx, J.P.L., & de Rooij, J.J
(1978) Contributions of prosody to speech perception. In W.J.M. Levelt, & G.B. Flores d’Arcais (Eds.), Studies in the perception of language (pp. 75–108). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, S.G., & Doodeman, G.J.N
(1980) Production and perception of vowel length in spoken sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 276–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Dommelen, W.A
(1980) Temporale Faktoren bei ausländischem Akzent. [Temporal factors of foreign accent] PhD dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar