Cover not available
Part of
Above and Beyond the Segments: Experimental linguistics and phonetics
Edited by Johanneke Caspers, Yiya Chen, Willemijn Heeren, Jos Pacilly, Niels O. Schiller and Ellen van Zanten
[Not in series 189] 2014
► pp. 174–188

Phonetic aspects of polar questions in Sienese

An experimental approach

| Webster University (Leiden)
ORCID logo
This study provides empirical evidence for the monoclausal status of a specific polar interrogative construction in Sienese, an Italian dialect spoken in Tuscany. At first sight, this question type looks like a biclausal discourse including two separate questions. There is however considerable syntactic evidence in favor of a monoclausal analysis. A production experiment was conducted to find out whether any correlations can be established between the underlying syntactic structure and the phonetic realization of polar questions in Sienese. The results indicate that these structures systematically correlate with distinctive prosodic properties that unambiguously establish their monoclausal status. This contribution shows how experimental approaches may be used as a powerful tool for testing syntactic hypotheses.
Published online: 10 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.189.15lus
References (7)
References
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2005). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program].
Elsendoorn, B.A.G. (1984). Tolerance of durational properties in British English vowels. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Flege, J.E., & Hillenbrand, J. (1986). Differential use of temporal cues to the /s/–/z/ contrast by native and non-native speakers of English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 708–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lusini, S. (2012). Yes/no question-marking in Italian dialects: A typological, theoretical and experimental approach. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, S.G., Brokx, J.P.L., & de Rooij, J.J. (1978). Contributions of prosody to speech perception. In W.J.M. Levelt, & G.B. Flores d’Arcais (Eds.), Studies in the perception of language (pp. 75–108). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, S.G., & Doodeman, G.J.N. (1980). Production and perception of vowel length in spoken sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 276–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dommelen, W.A. (1980). Temporale Faktoren bei ausländischem Akzent. [Temporal factors of foreign accent] PhD dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar