Etymological sub-lexicons constrain the graphematic solution space

Neijt, Anneke

doi:10.1075/z.189.16nei

Part of

Above and Beyond the Segments: Experimental linguistics and phonetics
Edited by Johanneke Caspers, Yiya Chen, Willemijn Heeren, Jos Pacilly, Niels O. Schiller and Ellen van Zanten
[Not in series 189] 2014
► pp. 189–202

Etymological sub-lexicons constrain the graphematic solution space

Anneke Neijt

Graphematics comprises of the theory of writing systems dissociated from the normative aspects of orthography. Neef (2005, 2012) adds the notion of graphematic solution space, the orthographic options available for the words in a language. These options may be different for the words of different sub-lexicons, an issue that calls for a definition of such sub-lexicons. This paper proposes to use the filter approach of Van Heuven, Neijt, & Hijzelendoorn (1994). This paper concludes with critical remarks about Neef ’s assumption of a subset relation between vocabulary levels and the more general claim of the graphematics enterprise that the study of writing systems can escape the norms and conventions of orthography.

Published online: 10 December 2014

https://doi.org/10.1075/z.189.16nei

References (24)

References

Bierwisch, M. (1972). Schriftstruktur und Phonologie [Writing structure and phonology]. Probleme und Ergebnisse der Psychologie, 43, 21–44.

Carney, E. (1994). A survey of English spelling. London, New York: Routledge.

De Vries, J. (1971). Nederlands etymologisch woordenboek [Dutch etymological dictionary]. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

Eisenberg, P. (1988). Über die Autonomie der graphematischen Analyse [On the autonomy of graphematic analysis]. In D. Nerius & G. Augst (Eds.), Probleme der geschriebenen Sprache (pp. 25–35).Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften (Linguistische Studien Reihe A 173).

. (2006). Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik[A sketch of German grammar]. Band 1, Das Wort (3rd ed.). Stuttgart, Weimar: Metzler.

Fuhrhop, N. (2005). Orthografie [Orthography]. Heidelberg: Winter.

Gallmann, P. (1986). The graphic elements of German written language. In G. Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphemics and orthography (pp. 43–79). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.

Heemskerk, J.S.M., & Van Heuven, V.J. (1993). MORPA, a MORphological PArser for a Dutch text-to-speech system. In V.J. van Heuven & L.C.W. Pols (Eds.), Analysis and synthesis of speech, towards high-quality text-to-speech generation (pp. 67–85). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Hyman, L.M. (1977). On the nature of linguistic stress. Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 4, 37–92.

Kager, R., & Zonneveld, W. (1986). Schwa, syllables and extrametricality in Dutch. The Linguistic Review, 5, 197–221.

Neef, M. (2005). Die Graphematik des Deutschen [German graphematics]. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

. (2012). Graphematics as part of a modular theory of phonographic writing systems. Writing Systems Research, 4, 214–228.

Neijt, A., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H. (2003). Verpleegsters, ambassadrices and masseuses. Stratum differences in the comprehension of Dutch words with feminine agent suffixes. In P. Fikkert & L. Cornips (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2003 (pp. 117–127)Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Nunn, A.M. (1998). Dutch orthography: A systematic investigation of the spelling of Dutch words. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.

Nunn, A., & Van Heuven, V.J. (1993). MORPHON: Lexicon-based text-to-phoneme conversion and phonological rules. In V.J. van Heuven & L.C.W. Pols (Eds.), Analysis and synthesis of speech, towards high-quality text-to-speech generation, (pp. 87–99). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Sproat, R. (2000). A computational theory of writing systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van der Veen, P.A.F., & Van der Sijs, N. (1990). Etymologisch woordenboek, de herkomst van onze woorden [Etymological dictionary, the origin of our words]. Utrecht: Van Dale Lexicografie.

Van Heuven, V.J., Neijt, A.H., & Hijzelendoorn, M. (1994). Automatische indeling van Nederlandse woorden op basis van etymologische filters [Automatic classification of Dutch words on the basis of etymological filters]. Spektator, 23(4), 279–291.

Van Orden, G.C., Pennington, B.F., & Stone, G.O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488–522.

Van Wijk, N. (1980 [1912]). Franck’s etymologisch woordenboek der Nederlandsche taal [Franck’s etymological dictionary of the Dutch language]. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.

Venezky, R. (1970). The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton.

. (1999). The American way of spelling. New York/London: Guilford.

Weingarten, R. (2011). Comparative graphematics. In S.R. Borgwaldt & T. Joyce (Eds.), Typology of writing systems. Special issue of Written Language and Literacy, 14(1), 12–38.

Zuidema, J., & Neijt, A. (2012). Verkennend onderzoek naar de wenselijkheid en de haalbaarheid van een verrijking van de Woordenlijst Nederlandse Taal ten behoeve van spellingonderwijs. Rapport in opdracht van de Nederlandse Taalunie [An exploratory investigation of the advisability and feasibility of an enrichment of the official Dutch spelling for the benefit of spelling education. Report by order of the Dutch Language Union]. Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen. Retrievable from [URL]