The independent effects of prosodic structure and information status on tonal coarticulation
Evidence from Wenzhou Chinese
Various factors constrain the production of a sequence of lexical tones. This
study aims to test the joint influence of three important ones: tonal coarticulation,
prosodic structure, and information status. F0 realization of rising and
falling tones, in both compatible and conflicting tonal contexts, was compared
across two prosodic conditions (prosodic headedness and boundary depth) and
two focus conditions (with vs. without narrow focus). Results show that in conflicting
tonal contexts, where salient coarticulatory adjustment of F0 trajectories
is to be expected, both prosodic structure and information status influenced
the implementation of F0 slopes, albeit in different ways. These findings lend
support to the proposal that information status and prosodic structure exert
independent prosodic strengthening effects on tonal implementation.
References
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D
(
2001)
Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer.
Glot International, 5(9/10), 341–345.
Brunelle, M
(
2009)
Northern and Southern Vietnamese tone coarticulation: A comparative case study.
Journal of Southeast Asian Linguistics, 1, 49–62.
Byrd, D., & Saltzman, E
(
1998)
Intragestural dynamics of multiple prosodic boundaries.
Journal of Phonetics, 26(2), 173–199.
Cabré, T., & Prieto, P
(
2005)
Positional and metrical prominence effects on vowel sandhi in Catalan. In
S. Frota,
M. Vigário, &
M.J. Freitas (Eds.),
Prosodies. With special reference to Iberian languages (pp. 123–158). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chang, Y.-C., & Hsieh, F.-F
(
2012)
Tonal coarticulation in Malaysian Hokkien: A typological anomaly? The Linguistic Review, 29(1), 37–73.
Chen, M.Y
(
2000)
Tone sandhi. Patterns across Chinese dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chen, S., Wang, B., & Xu, Y
(
2009)
Closely related languages, different ways of realizing focus. In
M. Uther,
R. Moore, &
S. Cox (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 10th annual conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech), Brighton, UK (pp. 1007–1010).
Chen, Y
(
2003)
The phonetics and phonology of contrastive focus in Beijing Mandarin. PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
Chen, Y
(
2004)
Focus and intonational phrase boundary in Standard Chinese.
Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language Processing, Hongkong, 41-44.
Chen, Y
(
2006)
Durational adjustment under corrective focus in Standard Chinese.
Journal of Phonetics, 34(2), 176-201.
Chen, Y
(
2009)
Prosody and information structure mapping: Evidence from Shanghai Chinese.
Chinese Journal of Phonetics, 2(1), 123–133.
Chen, Y
(
2010)
Post-focus suppression: Now you see it, now you don’t.
Journal of Phonetics, 38, 517–525.
Chen, Y
(
2012)
Tonal variation. In
A. Cohn,
C. Fourgeron, &
M. Huffman (Eds.),
Oxford handbook of laboratory phonology (pp. 103–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chen, Y., & Braun, B
(
2006)
Prosodic realization of information structure categories in Standard Chinese. In
R. Hoffmann, &
H. Mixdorff (Eds.),
Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2006, Dresden: TUD Press.
Chen, Y., & Gussenhoven, C
(
2008)
Emphasis and tonal implementation in Standard Chinese.
Journal of Phonetics, 36(4), 724–746.
Cho, T
(
2004)
Prosodically conditioned strengthening and vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in English.
Journal of Phonetics, 32(2), 141–176.
Cho, T
(
2006)
Manifestation of prosodic structure in articulation: Evidence from lip kinematics in English. In
L. Goldstein,
D.H. Whalen, &
C.T. Best (Eds.),
Laboratory phonology VIII: Varieties of phonological competence (pp. 519–548). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cho, T., & Keating, P
(
2009)
Effects of initial position versus prominence in English.
Journal of Phonetics, 37(4), 466–485.
Cinque, G
(
1993)
A null theory of phrase and compound stress.
Linguistic Inquiry, 24(2), 239–297.
De Jong, K., Beckman, M.E., & Edwards, J
(
1993)
The interplay between prosodic structure and coarticulation.
Language and Speech, 36(2–3), 197–212.
Duanmu, S
(
1995)
Metrical and tonal phonology of compounds in two Chinese dialects.
Language, 71(2), 225–259.
Duanmu, S
(
2012)
Word-length preferences in Chinese: A corpus study.
Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 21(1), 89–114.
Féry, C
(
2010)
Syntax, information structure, embedded prosodic phrasing, and the relational scaling of pitch accents. In
N. Erteschik-Shir, &
L. Rochman (Eds.),
The sound patterns of syntax (pp. 271–290). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Féry, C., & Samek-Lodovici, V
(
2006)
Focus projection and prosodic prominence in nested foci.
Language, 82, 131–150.
Fougeron, C., & Keating, P.A
(
1997)
Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 3728–3740.
Gandour, J., Potisuk, S., & Dechongkit, S
(
1994)
Tonal coarticulation in Thai.
Journal of Phonetics, 22(4), 477–492.
Gu, W., & Lee, T
(
2007)
Effects of tonal context and focus on Cantonese F0. In
J. Trouvain, &
W.J. Barry (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences
(pp. 1033–1036). August 6-10, 2007, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Gussenhoven, C
(
1992)
Sentence accents and argument structure. In
I.M. Roca (Ed.),
Thematic structure: Its role in grammar (pp. 79–106). Berlin: Foris.
Ishihara, S
(
2011)
Japanese focus prosody revisited: Freeing focus from prosodic phrasing.
Lingua, 121, 1870–1889.
Jin, S
(
1996)
An acoustic study of sentence stress in Mandarin Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus.
Jun, S.-A
(
1998)
The accentual phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy.
Phonology, 15(2), 189–226.
Kabagema-Bilan, E., López-Jiménez, B., & Truckenbrodt, H
(
2011)
Multiple focus in Mandarin Chinese.
Lingua, 121, 1890–1905.
Li, Q., & Chen, Y
(
2012)
Trisyllabic tone sandhi in Tianjin Mandarin.
Proceedings of Tonal Aspect of Languages (TAL)
, Nanjing, China.
Pan, H.-H., & Tai, Y
(
2006)
Boundaries and tonal articulation in Taiwanese Min.
Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2006
, Dresden, Germany, 51–54.
Peng, S.-H
(
1997)
Production and perception of Taiwanese tones in different tonal and prosodic contexts.
Journal of Phonetics, 25(3), 371–400.
Potisuk, S., Gandour, J., & Harper, M.P
(
1997)
Contextual variations in trisyllabic sequences of Thai tones.
Phonetica, 54, 22–42.
Samek-Lodovici, V
(
2005)
Prosody-syntax interaction in the expression of focus.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 23(3), 687–755.
Selkirk, E
(
2002)
Contrastive FOCUS vs. presentational focus: Prosodic evidence from right node raising in English. In
B. Bel, &
I. Marlin (Eds.),
Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002 (pp. 643–646). Aix-en-Provence, France.
Selkirk, E
(
2007)
Contrastive focus, givenness and the unmarked status of “discourse-new”.
Interdisciplinary studies on information structure (ISIS), 6, 125–145.
Selkirk, E
(
2010)
The Syntax-Phonology Interface. In
J. Goldsmith,
J. Riggle, &
A. Yu (Eds.),
The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 435–484). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Truckenbrodt, H
(
1999)
On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases.
Linguistic Inquiry, 30(2), 219–255.
Xu, Y
(
1994)
Production and perception of coarticulated tones.
Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 95(4), 2240–2253.
Xu, Y
(
1997)
Contextual tonal variations in Mandarin.
Journal of Phonetics, 25(1), 61–83.
Xu, Y
(
1999)
Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of f0 contours.
Journal of Phonetics, 27(1), 55–105.
Yip, M
(
1999)
Feet, tonal reduction and speech rate at the word and phrase level in Chinese. In
R. Kager &
W. Zonneveld (Eds.),
Phrasal phonology (pp. 171–194). Nijmegen: Nijmegen University Press.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
DiCanio, Christian, Joshua Benn & Rey Castillo García
2021.
Disentangling the Effects of Position and Utterance-Level Declination on the Production of Complex Tones in Yoloxóchitl Mixtec.
Language and Speech 64:3
► pp. 515 ff.
Scholz, Franziska & Yiya Chen
2014.
Sentence planning and f0 scaling in Wenzhou Chinese.
Journal of Phonetics 47
► pp. 81 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.