Part of
Colour Studies: A broad spectrumEdited by Wendy Anderson, Carole P. Biggam, Carole Hough and Christian Kay
[Not in series 191] 2014
► pp. 109–125
Edited by Wendy Anderson, Carole P. Biggam, Carole Hough and Christian Kay
[Not in series 191] 2014
► pp. 109–125
Her blue eyes are red
An idealized cognitive model of conceptual color metonymy in English
The lexical frame of color as a primary experience is often used to exemplify linguistic theories and yet there is still a lack of a cognitive color model. Cognitive linguistics establishes meaning in a central role through the ideas of embodied experience and cognitive models that are evinced through usage-based analysis. I present the fifth type of distinction in a conceptual mapping of color in English; four types have been presented earlier in Sandford (2010, 2011a and 2011b). The new part of this mapping is Conceptual Color Metonymy, based on one hundred random examples of each of six basic color terms extracted from the Corpus of Contemporary American English. An idealized cognitive model of conceptual color metonymy mapping reveals primary conceptual correlations in experience, and the predominant conceptualization mechanism pattern that emerged from this study is color attribute (is access) for conceptual space.
References
Barcelona, Antonio
2003a “Introduction: The Cognitive Theory of Metaphor and Metonymy.” In Barcelona [2000] 2003c, 1–28.
2003b “On the Plausibility of Claiming a Metonymic Motivation for Conceptual Metaphor.” In Barcelona [2000] 2003, 31–58.
(ed.) 2003c Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 
2011 “Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy.” In Benczes, Barcelona, and Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, 7–59.
Barcelona, Antonio, Réka Benczes, and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
2011 “Introduction.” In Benczes, Barcelona, and Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez 2011, 1–6.
Benczes, Réka, Antonio Barcelona, and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
(eds.) 2011 Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Barnden, John A
2010 “Metaphor and Metonymy: Making their Connections More Slippery.” Cognitive Linguistics 21 (1): 1–34.
Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 Million Words (COCA)
Cruse, D. Alan
1986 Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, William, and D. Alan Cruse
2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dirven, Rene, and Ralf Pörings
(eds) 2002 Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Goossens, Louis
1990 “Metaphtonymy: The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Expressions of Linguistic Action.” Cognitive Linguistics 1: 323–340.
Kövecses, Zoltán
2010 Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, George
1990 Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1999 Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.
[1980]2003 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner
1989 More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, Ronald W
1990 Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2008 Cognitive Grammar. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe, Linda L. Thornburg, and Antonio Barcelona
Peirsman, Yves, and Dirk Geeraerts
2006 “Metonymy as a Prototypical Category.” Cognitive Linguistics 17 (3): 269–316.
Radden, Günter
2003 “How Metonymic are Metaphors?” In Barcelona 2003c, 93–108.
Radden, Günter, and Zoltán Kövecses
1999 “Towards a Theory of Metonymy.” In Metaphor and Pragmatic Inferencing, ed. by Klaus-Uwe Panther, and Günter Radden. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Reaney, P.H
1997 A Dictionary of English Surnames.3rd ed. with corrections and additions by R.M. Wilson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
2003 “The Role of Mappings and Domains in Understanding Metonymy.” In Barcelona 2003c, 109–132.
2011 “Metonymy and Cognitive Operations.” In Benczes, Barcelona, and Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez 2011, 103–124.
Sandford, Jodi L
2010 “I Can Tell You What Color it is.” Textus 23 (3), 719–735. A special issue entitled Cognition and the Brain in Language and Linguistics, ed. by Marcella Bertuccelli Papi, and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez.
2011a “Color Linguistic Vantage and the Surround.” In Proceedings of the Seventh National Color Conference, Gruppo del Colore – SIOF Sapienza Università di Roma, Facoltà di Ingegneria, Roma, Italy, 15–16 settembre 2011, ed. by Maurizio Rossi, 153–160. (= Colour and Colorimetry, Multidisciplinary Contributions, 7B). Rimini: Maggioli Editore.
2011b “Conceptual Metaphor and the Interaction Between Color and Light”. In AIC 2011, Interaction of Colour and Light in the Arts and Sciences, Midterm Meeting of the International Colour Association (AIC), 7–10 June 2011, Zurich, Switzerland: Conference Proceedings, ed. by Verena M. Schindler, and Stephan Cuber, 706–709. Zurich: pro/colore.
2011c “Cool, Warm, Dark, Light, or Afterimage: Dimensions and Connotations of Conceptual Color Metaphor/Metonym.” In New Directions in Colour Studies, ed. by Carole P. Biggam, Carole A. Hough, Christian J. Kay, and David R. Simmons, 205–218. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2012 Red Clover – Linguaggio e percezione dei colori: uno studio cognitivo applicato alla lingua inglese. Rome: Aracne Editrice.
Talmy, Leonard
2003 Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Wierzbicka, Anna
1996 Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2006 “The Semantics of Colour: A New Paradigm.” In Progress in Colour Studies, Volume 1: Language and Culture, ed. by C.P. Biggam and C.J. Kay, 1–24. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.