Article published in:
Writing(s) at the Crossroads: The process–product interface
Edited by Georgeta Cislaru
[Not in series 194] 2015
► pp. 1–18

Writing(s) at the crossroads

The process-product interface

| CLESTHIA, Université Sorbonne nouvelle Paris 3
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 05 August 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.194.01cis
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kroll, Jeri
2018. The creative writing doctoral thesis: insights from genetic criticism. New Writing 15:2 ► pp. 148 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Alamargot, Denis, and Lucile Chanquoy
(Eds.) 2001 Through the Models of Writing. Studies in Writing, Vol. 9. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allal, Linda, Lucile Chanquoy, and Pierre Largy
(Eds) 2004 Revision: Cognitive and Instructional Processes (Vol. 13). Dordrecht et al.: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anokhina, Olga, and Sabine Pétillon
2009 Critique génétique: concepts, méthodes, outils. Paris: IMEC.Google Scholar
Baaijen, Veerle Marije
2012 The Development of Understanding Through Writing. Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics 107.Google Scholar
Barton, David, and Uta Papen
(Eds.) 2010a The Anthropology of Writing: Understanding Textually Mediated Worlds. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Barton, David and Uta Papen
2010b “What is the anthropology of writing?” In The Anthropology of Writing: Understanding Textually Mediated Worlds, ed. by David Barton, and Uta Papen, 4–32. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bazerman, Charles
(Ed.) 2007 Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bazerman, Charles, and Paul A. Prior
(Eds.) 2004 What Writing Does and How It Does It. An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices. Mahwah, NJ/London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Beaugrande, Robert de
1984 Text Production: Toward a Science of Composition. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex. Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika
2009 “Language patterns and Attitude.” Functions of Language 16(2): 165–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van den Bergh, Huub, and Gert Rijlaarsdam
1996 “The dynamics of composing: modeling writing process data.” In The Science of Writing. Theories, Methods, Individual Differences and Applications, ed. by C. Michael Levy, and Sarah Ransdell, 207–231. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berninger, Virginia W.
(Ed.) 2012 Past, Present and Future Contributions of Cognitive Writing Research to Cognitive Psychology. New York/London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Berninger, Virginia W., and Todd L. Richards
2002 Brain Literacy for Educators and Psychologists. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K.
1993 Analysing Genre. Language Use in Professional Settings. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Viviana Cortes
2004 “If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks.” Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boutet, Josiane
1997 [1994] Construire le sens. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Branca-Rosoff, Sonia, and Nathalie Schneider
1994 L’écriture des citoyens. Une analyselinguistique de l’écrituredes peu lettrés pendant la période révolutionnaire. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Brandt, Deborah
1990 Literacy as Involvement: The Acts of Writers, Readers and Texts. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Candlin, Christopher N., and Ken Hyland
(Eds.) 1999 Writing: Text, Processes, and Practices. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Cislaru, Georgeta
2014 “Contraintes linguistiques et contextuelles dans la production écrite.” Les Carnets du Cediscor 12: 55–74.Google Scholar
Courtine, Jean-Jacques
1981 “La notion de ‘condition de production de discours’.” Langaages 15(62): 19–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doquet-Lacoste, Claire
2004 “Genèse des textes, genèse des scripteurs: regards sur la langue dans l’écriture.” In Ecriture. Approches en sciences cognitives, ed. by Annie Piolat, 233–250. Aix-en-Provence: Publication de l’Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Fenoglio, Irène, and Lucile Chanquoy
(Eds.) 2007 Avant le texte: les traces de l’élaboration textuelle. Special issue of Langue française 155.Google Scholar
Flower, Linda
1994 The Construction of Negotiated Meaning: A Social Cognitive Theory of Writing. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Béatrice
2007 “Actes d’écriture: Quand écrire c’est faire.” Langage & Société 121–122: 101–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Writing Acts: When Writing Is Doing.” In The Anthropology of Writing: Understanding Textually Mediated Worlds, ed. by David Barton and Uta Papen, 33–43. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Catherine, Almuth Grésillon, Jean-Louis Lebrave, Jean Peytard, and Josette Rey-Debove
2003[1982] La genèse du texte. Les modèles linguistiques. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
Galbraith, David
2009 “Cognitive models of writing.” German as a Foreign Language 2–3: 7–22.Google Scholar
Gee, James Paul
2000 “The New Literacy Studies. From ‘socially situated’ to the work of the social.” In Situated Literacies. Reading and Writing in Context, ed. by David Barton, Mary Hamilton, and Roz Ivanič, 180–196. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gehle, Quentin L., and Duncan J. Rollo
1977 The Writing Process. Toronto: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hay, Louis
1996 “History or Genesis?” Yale French Studies 89: 191–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, John R., and Linda S. Flower
1980 “Identifying the Organization of Writing Processes.” In Cognitive Process in Writing, ed. by Lee Gregg, and Erwin R. Steinberg, 3–30. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2005 Metadiscourse. Exploring Interaction in Writing. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell
1971 On Communicative Competence. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ivanič, Roz
1998 Writing and Identity. The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keseling, Gisbert
1992 “Pause and intonation contours in written and oral discourse.” In Cooperating with Written Texts. The Pragmatics and Comprehension of Written Texts, ed. by Dieter Stein, 31–66. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leijten, Mariëlle, and Luuk Van Waes
2006 “Inputlog: New Perspectives on the Logging of On-Line Writing.” In Studies in Writing: Vol. 18. Computer Key-Stroke Logging and Writing: Methods and Applications, ed. by Kirk P.H. Sullivan, and Eva Lindgren, 73–94. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Leijten, Mariëlle, Lieve Macken, Véronique Hoste, Erik Van Horenbeeck, and Luuk Van Waes
2012 “From Character to Word Level: Enabling the Linguistic Analyses of Inputlog Process Data.” In Linguistic and Cognitive Aspects of Document Creation and Document Engineering. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Writing (Avignon, CLW 2012), ed. by Michael Piotrowski, Cerstin Mahlow, and Robert Dale, 1–8. ACL: Stroudsburg.Google Scholar
Lindgren, Eva, Mariëlle Leijten, and Luuk Van Waes
2008 “Writing development and knowledge crafting.” Conference Writing Research Across Borders, Santa-Barbara.
Macken, Lieve, Véronique Hoste, Mariëlle Leijten, and Luuk Van Waes
2012 “From keystrokes to annotated process data: Enriching the output of Inputlog with linguistic information.” Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’12), 2224–2229. Istanbul: Turkey.
Maingueneau, Dominique
1984 Genèses du discours. Liège: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Murray, Donald D.
1972 “Teach language as a process not product.” The Leaflet, November 1972 11–14. áhttp://​www​.willamette​.edu​/gse​/owp​/docs​/TeachWritingasaProcessNotProduct​.pdfñGoogle Scholar
Olive, Thierry, Ronald T. Kellogg, and Annie Piolat
2008 “Verbal, visual and spatial working memory demands during text composition.” Applied Psycholinguistics 29: 669–687. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olive, Thierry, Rui A. Alves, and São Luís Castro
2009 “Cognitive processes in writing during pauses and execution periods.” European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 21: 758–785. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olive, Thierry, and Jean-Michel Passerault
2012 “The visuospatial dimension of writing.” Written Communication 29: 326–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, Lynn
2010 “ ‘Writing’ and ‘region’ in the 21st century: Epistemological reflections on regionally-located art and literature in the wake of the digital revolution.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 13: 27–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perrin, Daniel
(Ed.) 2003a Pragmatics of Writing. Special issue of Journal of Pragmatics 35(6).Google Scholar
2003b “Towards a Pragmatics of Writing.” Journal of Pragmatics 35(6): 825–828. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 The Linguistics of Newswriting. Amsterdam, New York et al.: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perrin, Daniel, and Marc Wildi
2010 “Statistical modeling of writing processes.” In The Traditions of Writing Research, ed. by Charles Bazerman, 378–393. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Plane, Sylvie, Thierry Olive, and Denis Alamargot
(Eds.) 2010 Traitement des contraintes de la production d’écrits: aspects linguistiques et psycholinguistiques. Special issue of Langages 177.Google Scholar
Prior, Paul
2004 “Tracing Process: How Texts Come Into Being.” In What Writing Does and How It Does It. An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices, ed. by Charles Bazerman, and Paul A. Prior, 167–200. Mahwah, NJ/London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2006 “A Sociocultural theory of writing.” In Handbook of Writing Research, ed. by Charles A. MacArthur, Steve Graham, and Jill Fitzgerald, 54–66. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted, and Carel Van Wijk
1996 “Text analysis as a research tool. How hierarchical text structure contributes to the understanding of conceptual processes in writing.” In The Science of Writing. Theories, Methods, Individual Differences and Applications, ed. by Michael C. Levy, and Sarah Ransdell, 251–270. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, Mary J.
2007 “Grammar, the Sentence, and Traditions of Linguistic Analysis.” In Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text, ed. by Charles Bazerman, 673–691. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Severinson-Eklundh, Kerstin, and Py Kollberg
2001 “Studying writers’ revision patterns with s-notation analysis.” In Contemporary Tools and Techniques for Studying Writing, ed. by Thierry Olive, and Michael C. Levy, 89–104. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John
2004 Trust the Text. Language, Corpus and Discourse. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spelman Miller, Kristyan, and Kirk P.H. Sullivan
2006 “Keystroke logging: an introduction.” In Computer Keystroke Logging: Methods and Applications, ed. by Kirk P.H. Sullivan, and Eva Lindgren, 1–9. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Stein, Dieter
1992 “Cooperating with written texts: Towards a science of the text. Issues and overview.” In Cooperating with Written Texts. The Pragmatics and Comprehension of Written Texts, ed. by Dieter Stein, 1–12. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strömqvist, Sven, Kenneth Holmqvist, Victoria Johansson, Henrik Karlsson, and Åsa Wengelin
2006 “What keystroke logging can reveal about writing.” In Computer Keystroke Logging: Methods and Applications, ed. by Kirk P.H. Sullivan, and Eva Lindgren, 45–71. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael
1997 “Critical comments on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA).” In Evolving Models of Language, ed. by Ann Ryan, and Alison Wray, 100–116. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Kirk P.H., and Eva Lindgren
(Eds) 2006 Computer Key-Stroke Logging and Writing (Studies in Writing, Methods and Applications, vol. 18). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Tolchinsky, Liliana, Joan Perera, and Noemi Argerich
1999 “Units of analysis in two approaches to text analysis.” In Writing and Learning to Write at the Dawn of the 21st Century. 1998 Writing Conference Proceedings, ed. by Marie-Françoise Crété, and Eric Espéret, 339–344. Poitiers: LaCo-CNRS, Maison des Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société, Université de Poitiers.Google Scholar
Torrance, Mark, Denis Alamargot, Montserrat Castelló, Franck Ganier, Otto Kruse, Anne Mangen, Liliana Tolchinsky, and Luuk Van Waes
(Eds.) 2012 Learning to Write Effectively: Current Trends in European Research. Studies in Writing, vol. 25. Brill.Google Scholar
Torrance, Mark, and David Galbraith
(Eds) 1999 Knowing What to Write: Conceptual Processes in Text Production. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van der Geest, Thea
1996 “Studying ‘real life’ writing processes. A proposal and an example.” In The Science of Writing. Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications, ed. by C. Michael Levy, and Sarah Ransdell, 309–322. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van Waes, Luuk, and Anne Mangen
2012 “Introduction. Tools for studying and supporting writing. Technological advances in writing research.” In Learning to Write Effectively. Current Trends in European Research, ed. by Mark Torrance, Denis Alamargot, Montserrat Castello, Franck Ganier, Otto Kruse, Anne Mangen, Liliana Tolchinsky, and Luuk Van Waes, 345–351. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jeff, and Frank Brisard
2009 “Adaptability.” In Key Notions for Pragmatics, ed. by Jeff Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman, 28–47. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev S.
1978 Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Ed. by Michael Cole, Vera John-Steiner, Sylvia Scribner, and Ellen Souberman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
1992 “Strategies in text production and text comprehension: A new perspective.” In Cooperating with Written Texts. The Pragmatics and Comprehension of Written Texts, ed. by Dieter Stein, 493–528. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar