Analysing the linguistic content of bursts of production
Thierry Olive | Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique & Université de Poitiers, France
Georgeta Cislaru | CLESTHIA, Université Sorbonne nouvelle Paris 3
In the present study, we adopt a cognitive-discursive approach to analyse the linguistic structures of bursts of production in a corpus of reports by social workers about children at-risk. Bursts were identified as periods of fluent writing between pauses of at least two seconds, and were coupled with textometric analyses of the final texts. We focused on repeated segments (RS) of texts, i.e. sequences of at least two linguistic units that are repeated at least twice in the corpus. Preliminary analyses showed that the number of bursts with identical or nearly identical content to repeated segments in the texts was limited. Morphosyntactic and semantic descriptions of RSs and bursts indicated that short and medium-sized bursts mainly corresponded to complete syntactical constituents, whereas short and medium RSs often correspond to incomplete syntactical constituents. All together, this study offers information on the structure of the language that is produced during bursts, and thereby raises further questions about the status of routines both at the discursive and psycholinguistic levels.
2001Through the models of writing. Dordrecht (NL): Kluwer.
Alamargot, Denis, Christophe Dansac, David Chesnet, and Michel Fayol
2007 “Parallel processing before and after pauses: A combined analysis of graphomotor and eye movements during procedural text production.” In Writing and Cognition: Research and Applications, ed. by Mark Torrance, Luuk Van Waes, and David Galbraith, 13–29. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Alamargot, Denis, Patrice Tellier, and Jean-Marie Cellier
(Eds.)2007Writing in the work place. Amsterdam: Brill.
Alves, Rui A., Marta Branco, Sao Luis Castro, and Thierry Olive
2011 “Children of high transcription skill compose using bigger language bursts.” In Past, Present, and Future Contributions of Cognitive Writing Research to Cognitive Psychology, ed. by Virginia W. Berninger, 389–402. New York: Psychology Press.
Alves, Rui A., Thierry Olive, and Sao Luis Castro
2008The Transcriber contributes to burst length in written language production. Paper at the Writing Research Across Borders Conference. Santa-Barbara. CA, USA. February 22–24.
Alves, Rui A., Sao Luis Castro, and Thierry Olive
2008 “Execution and pauses in writing narratives: Processing time, cognitive effort and typing skill.” International Journal of Psychology 43: 969–979.
Alves, Rui A., Sao Luis Castro, Luisa Sousa, and Sven Strömqvist
2007 “Typing skill and pause-execution cycles in written composition.” In Writing and Cognition, Research and Applications, ed. by Mark Torrance, Luuk Van Waes, and David Galbraith, 55–65. Dordrecht: Elsevier Sciences Publishers.
Baaijen, Veerle M., David Galbraith, and Kees de Glopper
2012 “Keystroke Analysis: Reflections on Procedures and Measures.” Written Communication 29: 246–277.
2004 “If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks.” Applied Linguistics 25 (3): 371–405.
Chanquoy, Lucile, Jean-Noel Foulin, and Michel Fayol
1996 “Writing in adults: A real-time approach.” In Writing Research: Theories, Models and Methodology, ed. by Gert Rijlaarsdam, Huub van den Bergh, and Michel Couzjin, 36–43. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Chenoweth, Anne N., and John R. Hayes
2001 “Fluency in writing.” Written Communication 18: 80–98.
Chenu, Florence, François Pellegrino, Harriet Jisa, and Michel Fayol
2014 “Interword and intraword pause threshold in the writing of texts by children and adolescents: a methodological approach.” Frontiers in Psychology 5: 182.
Cislaru, Georgeta
2014 “Contraintes linguistiques et contextuelles dans la production écrite.” Les Carnets du Cediscor 12: 55–74.
Cislaru, Georgeta, Frédérique Sitri, and Frédéric Pugnière-Saavedra
2013 “Figement et configuration textuelle: les segments de discours répétés dans les rapports éducatifs.” In Across the Line of Speech and Writing Variation. Corpora and Language in Use – Proceedings 2, ed. by Catherine Bolly, and Liesbeth Degand, 165–183. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
Détrie, Catherine, Paul Siblot, and Bertrand Verine
2001Termes et concepts pour l’analyse du discours: une approche praxématique. Paris: Honoré Champion.
Erman, Britt, and Beatrice Warren
2000 “The idiom-principle and the open-choice principle.” Text 20: 29–62.
Foulin, Jean-Noel
1995 “Pauses et débits: les indicateurs temporels de la production écrite.” L’Année Psychologique 95: 483–504.
Foulin, Jean-Noel
1998 “To what extent does pause location predict pause duration in adults and children writing.” Current Psychology of Cognition 17: 601–620.
Hayes, John R., and Anne N. Chenoweth
2006 “Is working memory involved in the transcribing and editing of texts?” Written Communication 23: 135–149.
Hoey, Michael
2004 “Lexical priming and the properties of text.” In Corpora and Discourse, ed. by Alan Partington, John Morley, and Louann Haarman, 385–412. Bern: Peter Lang.
Hoey, Michael
2005Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.
1971On Communicative Competence. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Kaufer, David S., John R. Hayes, and Linda Flower
1986 “Composing written sentences.” Research in the Teaching of English 20: 121–140.
Kuiper, Koenraad
2009Formulaic Genres. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lafon, Pierre, and André Salem
1983 “L’inventaire des segments répétés d’un texte.” Mots 6: 161–177.
Langacker, Ronald
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lardilleux, Adrien, Serge Fleury, and Georgeta Cislaru
2013“Allongos: Longitudinal Alignment for the Genetic Study of Writers’ Drafts.” Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, Springer LNCS 7817: 537–548.
Leijten, Mariëlle, and Luuk Van Waes
2006 “Inputlog: New Perspectives on the Logging of On-Line Writing.” In Studies in Writing: Vol. 18. Computer Keystroke Logging and Writing: Methods and Applications, ed. by Kirk P.H. Sullivan, and Eva Lindgren, 73–94. Oxford: Elsevier.
Mayaffre, Damon
2007 “L’analyse de données textuelles aujourd’hui: du corpus comme une urne au corpus comme un plan. Retour sur les travaux actuels de topographie/topologie textuelle (partie I).” Lexicometrica 9. [URL]. (March 2, 2012).
Mey, Jacob L
1998 “Adaptability.” In Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, ed. by Jacob L. Mey, 5–7. Oxford: Elsevier.
Née, Emilie, Erin McMurray, and Serge Fleury
2012 “Textometric Explorations of Writing Processes: A Discursive and Genetic Approach to the Study of Drafts.” Lexicometrica JADT 2012 767–778.
Olive, Thierry
2004 “Working memory in writing: Empirical evidences from the dual-task technique.” European Psychologist 9: 32–42.
Olive, Thierry
2012 “Writing and working memory: A summary of theories and of findings.” In Handbook of Writing: A Mosaic of New Perspectives, ed. by Elena L. Grigorenko, Elisa Mambrino, and David D. Preiss, 125–140. New York: Psychology Press.
Olive, Thierry
2014 “Toward an Incremental and Cascading Model of Writing: A review of research on writing processes coordination.” Journal of Writing Research 6: 173–194.
Olive, Thierry, and Ronald T. Kellogg
2002 “Concurrent activation of high- and low-level production processes in written composition.” Memory & Cognition 30: 594–600.
Olive, Thierry, Alves Rui A., and Castro Sao Luis
2009 “Cognitive processes in writing during pauses and execution periods.” European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 21: 758–785.
1986 “Segments répétés et analyse statistique des données textuelles.” Histoire & Mesure 1(2): 5–28.
Schilperoord, Joost
2002 “On the cognitive status of pauses in discourse production.” In Contemporary Tools and Techniques for Studying Writing, ed. by Thierry Olive, and C. Michael Levy, 59–85. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2010 “Does frequency in text instantiate entrenchment in the cognitive system?” In Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-Driven Approaches, ed. by Dylan Glynn, and Kerstin Fischer, 101–133. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
In press. “A framework for understanding linguistic entrenchment and its psychological foundations in memory and automatization.” In Entrenchment, Memory and Automaticity. The Psychology of Linguistic Knowledge and Language Learning ed. by Hans-Jörg Schmid.Walter de Gruyter
Cislaru, Georgeta, Thierry Olive, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2016. Les automatismes du scripteur : Jets textuels spontanés dans le processus de production écrite, le cas des constructions coordinatives. SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 06003 ff.
Medimorec, Srdan & Evan F. Risko
2017. Pauses in written composition: on the importance of where writers pause. Reading and Writing 30:6 ► pp. 1267 ff.
Schneier, Joel
2021. Digital Articulation: Examining Text-Based Linguistic Performances in Mobile Communication Through Keystroke-Logging Analysis. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3
Sturm, Afra
2024. Hierarchieniedrige Schreibfähigkeiten und Schreibflüssigkeit: Ein mehrdeutiges Konstrukt. Lernen und Lernstörungen
[no author supplied]
2018. Références bibliographiques. In Le processus de textualisation [Champs linguistiques, ], ► pp. 237 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.