Cover not available
Part of
How to do Linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis
Natalia Levshina
[Not in series 195] 2015
► pp. 425–432

References

Agresti, A
(2002) Categorical Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allan, L.G
(1980) A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 147–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anishchanka, A
(2013) Seeing it in color: A usage-based perspective on color naming in advertising. PhD diss., University of Leuven.
Arppe, A., Han, W., & Newman, J
(2013) Polytomous logistic regression with Shanghainese topic markers. Vignette, CRAN-R Project. [URL] (last access 13.12.2014).
Atkins, B.T.S
(1987) Semantic ID tags: Corpus evidence for dictionary senses. The uses of large text databases. Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the UW Centre for the New Oxford English Dictionary (pp. 17–36). Waterloo, Canada.
Baayen, R.H
(2008) Analyzing Linguistic Data. A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balota, D.A., Yap, M.J., & Cortese, M.J., et al.
(2007) The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnbrook, G., Mason, O., & Krishnamurthy, R
(2013) Collocation: Applications and Implications. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., & Goodman, J.C
(1997) On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(5/6), 507–586. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlin, B., & Kay, P
(1969) Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D
(1988) Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, L
(1935) Language. London: Allen & Unwin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borg, I., & Groenen, P
(1997) Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, L
(2001) Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, M., & Choi, S
(2003) Space under construction: Language-specific spatial categorization in first language acquisition. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought (pp. 387–427). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, J., & Hay, J
(2008) Gradient Grammar: An effect of animacy on the syntax of give in New Zealand and American English. Lingua, 118(2), 245–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brugman, C
(1988 [1981]) The Story of Over: Polysemy, Semantics and the Structure of the Lexicon. New York: Garland. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bullinaria, J.A., & Levy, J.P
(2007) Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: A Computational Study. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 510–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J
(2001) Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J
(2008) Software for Data Analysis: Programming with R. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, W
(2012) R Graphics Cookbook. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N
(1957) Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Conover, W.J
(1999) Practical Nonparametric Statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Conover, W.J., Johnson, M.E., & Johnson, M.M
(1981) A comparative study of tests for homogeneity of variances, with applications to the outer continental shelf bidding data. Technometrics, 23, 351–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cox, T.F., & Cox, M.A.A
(2001) Multidimensional Scaling (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crawley, M.J
(2007) The R Book. Chichester: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E
(2009) Words as constructions. In V. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 201–223). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) N-grams and word frequency data from the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA). Available online at [URL].
(2013) Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 billion words from speakers in 20 countries. Available online at [URL].
de Leeuw, J
(1977) Applications of convex analysis to multidimensional scaling. In J. Barra, F. Brodeau, G. Romier, & B.V. Cutsem (Eds.), Recent Developments in Statistics (pp. 133–145). Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Deerwester, S., Dumais, S.T., Furnas, G.W., Landayer, T.K., & Harshman, R
(1990) Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 391–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H
(2007) Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 108–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Divjak, D
(2003) On trying in Russian: A tentative network model for near(er) synonyms. In Belgian Contributions to the 13th International Congress of Slavicists , Ljubljana, 15–21 August 2003. Special issue of Slavica Gandensia . (pp. 25–58). DOI logo
Divjak, D., & Gries, S. Th
(2006) Ways of trying in Russian: Clustering behavioral profiles. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2, 23–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Corpus-based cognitive semantics: A contrastive study of phasal verbs in English and Russian. In K. Dziwirek & B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Eds.), Studies in Cognitive Corpus Linguistics (pp. 273–296). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunning, T
(1993) Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19(1), 61–74.Google Scholar
Ellis, N
(2006) Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N., & Ferreira-Junior, F.G
(2009) Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 188–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ember, C.R., & Ember, M
(2007) Climate, econiche, and sexuality: Influences on sonority inlanguage. American Anthropologist, 109(1), 180–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everett, D
(2005) Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã: Another Look at the Design Features of Human Language. Current Anthropology, 46, 621–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evert, S
(2004) The Statistics of Word Cooccurrences: Word Pairs and Collocations. IMS, University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Everitt, B., & Hothorn, T
(2011) An Introduction to Applied Multivariate Analysis with R. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everitt, B.S., Landau, S., Leese, M., & Stahl, D
(2011) Cluster Analysis (5th ed.). Chichester: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faraway, J.J
(2009) Linear Models with R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.Google Scholar
Fox, J
(2008) Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Field, A., Miles, J., & Field, Z
(2012) Discovering Statistics Using R. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Firth, J.R
(1957) A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–1955. In J.R. Firth (Ed.), Studies in Linguistic Analysis (pp. 1–32). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Friendly, M
(1996) Paivio, et al. Word List Generator, Online application. Retrieved April 28 2013, from [URL]
Geeraerts, D
(1999) Idealist and empiricist tendencies in cognitive linguistics. In T. Janssen & G. Redeker (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology (pp. 163–194). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G
(2006) The place of prototypicality in corpus linguistics: Causation in the hot seat. In S. Th. Gries & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-Based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis (pp. 159–191). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2010) Corpus, Cognition and Causative Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gipper, H
(1959) Sessel oder Stuhl? Ein Beitrag zur Bestimmung von Wortinhalten im Bereich der Sachkultur. In H. Gipper (Ed.), Sprache – Schlüssel zur Welt: Festschrift für Leo Weisgerber (pp. 271–92). Düsseldorf: Schwann. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A.E., Casenhiser, D., & Sethuraman, N
(2004) Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 14(3), 289–316.Google Scholar
Gower, J.C
(1971) A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics, 27, 857–874. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenacre, M
(2007) Correspondence Analysis in Practice (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th
(2004) Coll.analysis 3. A program for R for Windows 2.x. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Corpus-based methods and Cognitive Semantics: The many senses of to run . In S. Th. Gries & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics. Corpus-based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis (pp. 57–99). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 403–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. New York/London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Behavioral Profiles: A fine-grained and quantitative approach in corpus-based lexical semantics. In G. Jarema, G. Libben, & C. Westbury (Eds.), Methodological and Analytic Frontiers in Lexical Research (pp. 57–80). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Statistics for Linguistics with R. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th., Hampe, B., & Schönefeld, D
(2005) Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(4), 635–676. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A
(2004) Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 97–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanks, P
(1996) Contextual dependency and lexical sets. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 1(1), 75–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Z
(1954) Distributional structure. Word, 10(2/3), 146–162.Google Scholar
(2013) Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hosmer, D.W., & Lemeshow, S
(2000) Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., & Zeileis, A
(2006) Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15(3), 651–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huck, S.W
(2009) Statistical Misconceptions. New York/London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Husson, F., Lê, S., & Pagès, J
(2010) Exploratory Multivariate Analysis by Example Using R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Itkonen, E
(1980) Qualitative vs. quantitative analysis in linguistics. In T.A. Perry (Ed.), Evidence and Argumentation in Linguistics (pp. 334–366). Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K
(2008) Quantiative Methods in Linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P.J
(1990) Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Kay, P., & McDaniel, C.K
(1978) The linguistic significance of the meanings of Basic Color Terms. Language, 54(3), 610–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kepser, S., & Reis, M
(2005) Evidence in Linguistics. In S. Kepser & M. Reis (Eds.), Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical and Computational Perspectives (pp. 1–6). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M
(2012) The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 287–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, B., & Lunkenheimer, K
(Eds.) (2013) The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Retrieved from [URL] doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, J.B
(1964) Multidimensional Scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrica, 29(1), 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kučera, H., & Francis, W.N
(1967) Computational Analysis of Present-day American English. Providence: Brown University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M
(1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Landauer, T.K., & Dumais, S.T
(1997) A solution to Plato’s problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.W
(1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson-Hall, J
(2010) A Guide to Doing Statistics in Second Language Research Using SPSS. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lehrer, A
(1974) Semantic Fields and Lexical Structure. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Levshina, N
(2011) Doe wat je niet laten kan [Do what you cannot let]: A usage-based analysis of Dutch causative constructions. PhD diss., University of Leuven.
(2014) Geographic variation of quite + ADJ in twenty national varieties of English: A pilot study. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 2, 109–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
In preparation). Convergent evidence of divergent knowledge: A study of the associations between the Russian ditransitive construction and its collexemes. DOI logo
Levshina, N., Geeraerts, D., & Speelman, D
(2011) Changing the world vs. changing the mind: Distinctive collexeme analysis of the causative construction with doen in Belgian and Netherlandic Dutch. In F. Gregersen, J. Parrot, & P. Quist (Eds.), Language variation - European perspectives III. Selected papers from the 5th International Conference on Language Variation in Europe, Copenhagen, June 2009 (pp. 111–123). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
(2013) Towards a 3D-Grammar: Interaction of linguistic and extralinguistic factors in the use of Dutch causative constructions. Journal of Pragmatics, 52, 34–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levshina, N., & Heylen, K
(2014) A radically data-driven construction grammar: Experiments with Dutch causative constructions. In R. Boogaart, T. Colleman, & G. Rutten (Eds.), Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar (pp. 17–46). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leys, C., Ley, C., Klein, O., Bernard, P., & Licata, L
(2013) Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 764–766. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lijffijt, J., & Gries, S. Th
(2012) Correction to “Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(1), 147–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, D
(1998) Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational linguistics , Montreal, Canada, August 1998 (pp. 768–774). DOI logo
Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A., & Swait, J.D
(2000) Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lund, K., & Burgess, C
(1996) Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrences. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 203–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manning, C., & Schütze, H
(1999) Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Matloff, N
(2011) The Art of R Programming: A Tour of Statistical Software Design. San Francisco: No Starch Press.Google Scholar
Michelbacher, L., Evert, S., & Schutze, H
(2011) Asymmetry in corpus-derived and human word associations. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 7(2), 245–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, G.A., & Charles, W.G
(1991) Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6(1), 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, J., & Lapata, M
(2010) Composition in distributional models of semantics. Cognitive Science, 34(8), 1388–1439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, J
(2011) Corpora and cognitive linguistics. Brazilian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 521–559.Google Scholar
Núñez, R.E., & Sweetser, E
(2006) With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30, 401–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pado, S., & Lapata, M
(2007) Dependency-based construction of Semantic Space Models. Computational Linguistics, 33(2), 161–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirsman, Y
(2008) Word Space Models of semantic similarity and relatedness. In Proceedings of the ESSLLI-2008 Student Session , Hamburg, Germany. DOI logo
Peirsman, Y., Heylen, K., & Geeraerts, D
(2010) Applying Word Space Models to sociolinguistics. Religion names before and after 9/11. In D. Geeraerts, G. Kristiansen, & Y. Peirsman (Eds.), Recent Advances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics (pp. 111–137). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paivio, A., Juille, J.C., & Madigan, S
(1968) Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(1, Pt. 2), 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C
(1997) Degree Modifiers of Adjectives in Spoken British English. Lund: Lund University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch Heider, E., & Olivier, D.C
(1972) The structure of the color space in naming and memory for two languages. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 337–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E
(1975) Cognitive representation of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104(3), 192–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C.B
(1975) Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salkind, N.J
(2011) Statistics for People Who (Think They) Hate Statistics (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H.-J
(2000) English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells. From corpus to cognition. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schütze, H
(1992) Dimensions of meaning. In Proceedings of Supercomputing 92 (pp. 787–796). Minneapolis, MN. DOI logo
Senghas, A., & Coppola, M
(2001) Children creating language: How Nicaraguan Sign Language acquired a spatial grammar. Psychological Science, 12(4), 323–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Senghas, A., Kita, S., & Özyürek, A
(2004) Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging Sign Language in Nicaragua. Science, 305(5691), 1779–1782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheskin, D.J
(2011) Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speelman, D., & Geeraerts, D
(2009) Causes for causatives: The case of Dutch ‘doen’ and ‘laten’. In T. Sanders & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Causal Categories in Discourse and Cognition (pp. 173–204). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Steels, L
(Ed.) (2012) Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G.J., Dorst, A.G., Herrmann, J.B., Kaal, A.A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T
(2010) A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification. From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A
(2001) Constructing causation: A construction grammar approach to analytic causatives. PhD diss., Rice University. DOI logo
(2010) Empirical Cognitive Semantics: Some thoughts. In D. Glynn & K. Fischer (Eds.), Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-driven Approaches (pp. 355–380). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. Th
(2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Covarying collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1(1), 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E
(1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B
(2010) The English genitive alternation in a cognitive sociolinguistics perspective. In D. Geeraerts, G. Kristiansen, & Y. Peirsman (Eds.), Advances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics (pp. 141–166). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S., & Baayen, R.H
(2012) Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change, 24(2), 135–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L
(1985) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Vol. III (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, J
(2012) The Mental Corpus. How Language is Represented in the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teetor, P
(2011) R Cookbook. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
Turney, P.D., & Pantel, P
(2010) From frequency to meaning: Vector Space Models of semantics. Journal of Articial Intelligence Research, 37, 141–188.Google Scholar
Urdan, T.C
(2010) Statistics in Plain English (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Verhagen, A., & Kemmer, S
(1997) Interaction and causation: Causative constructions in modern standard Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics, 24, 61–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, J., De Pauw, G., & Kloots, H
(2004) Speech rate in a pluricentric language: A comparison between Dutch in Belgium and the Netherlands. Language and Speech, 47(3), 297–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wickham, H
(2009) ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiechmann, D
(2008) On the computation of Collostruction Strength. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 4(2), 253–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A
(2006) English: Meaning and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Sydorenko, T
(2010) The effects of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities. Language Learning and Technology, 14(1), 65–86.Google Scholar
Wolk, C., Bresnan, J., Rosenbach, A., & Szmrecsanyi, B
(2013) Dative and genitive variability in Late Modern English: Exploring cross-constructional variation and change. Diachronica, 30(3), 382–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S
(2006) Go-V vs. go-and-V in English: A case of constructional synonymy? In S. Th. Gries & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics. Corpus-based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis (pp. 101–125). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wulff, S., Gries, S. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A
(2007) Brutal Brits and persuasive Americans: Variety-specific meaning construction in the into-causative. In G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of Meaning Construction (pp. 265–281). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zipf, G.K
(1935) The Psycho-Biology of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1949) Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. An Introduction to Human Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar