Article published in:
The Acquisition of the Present
Edited by Dalila Ayoun
[Not in series 196] 2015
► pp. 2156
Abusch, D
1988Sequence of tense, intensionality and scope. In Proceedings of the 7th West Coast Conference for Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 7), H. Borer (ed.), 1–14. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
1994Sequence of tense revisited: Two semantic accounts of tense in intensional contexts. In Ellipsis, Tense and Questions. DYANA-2, H. Kamp (ed.), 87–139. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
1997Sequence of tense and temporal de re. Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 1–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Altshuler, D
2008Narrative effects in Russian indirect reports and what they reveal about the meaning of the past tense. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT 18), T. Friedman & S. Ito (eds), 19–36. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Ayoun, D
2003Parameter Setting in Language Acquisition. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Copley, B
2009The Semantics of the Future. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crain, S. & Thornton, R
1998Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Experiments on the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
De Saussure, L
2011Le passé composé en usage futur et la pertinence au present. Journal of French language studies 22(2): 189–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Remarques sur l’usage futur du passé composé. Revue Tranel 51: 45–60.Google Scholar
Demirdache, H. & Lungu, O
2009Sequence of tense in (French) child language. In Linguistic Variation Yearbook 8, J. van Craenenbroeck & J. Rooryck (eds), 101–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Zero-tense vs. indexical construals of the present in French L1. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Tense Across Languages, R. Musan & M. Rathert (eds), 233–256. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, D
1979Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enç, M
1987Anchoring conditions for tense. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 633–657.Google Scholar
Grønn, A. & von Stechow, A
2011Future vs. present in Russian and English adjunct clauses. Scando-Slavica 57(2): 245–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Han, C, Lidz, J. & Musolino, J
2007V-raising and grammar competition in Korean: Evidence from negation and quantifier scope. Linguistic Inquiry 38(1): 1–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heim, I
1994Comments on Abusch's theory of tense. In Ellipsis, Tense and Questions, H. Kamp (ed.), 143–170. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Heim, I. & Kratzer, A
1998Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Hollebrandse, B
2000The Acquisition of Sequence of Tense. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Kaufmann, S
2005Conditional truth and future reference. Journal of Semantics 22: 231–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Khomitsevich, O
2008Dependencies across Phases: From Sequence of Tense to Restrictions on Movement. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Kratzer, A
1998More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, D. Strolovitch & A. Lawson (eds), 92–110. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Kroch, A
1989Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kusumoto, K
1999Tense in Embedded Contexts. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Lewis, D
1979Attitudes de dicto and de se. The Philosophical Review 88: 513–543. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lungu, O
2008Tense in embedded contexts: The case of Romanian. In Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics X(1), A. Cornilescu (ed.), 21–37. Bucharest: University of Bucharest.Google Scholar
2012Tense in Embedded Contexts: The View from (French) Child Language. PhD dissertation, Université de Nantes.
Lungu, O. Submitted
The embedded present in Romanian: An issue of (non)commitment. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Tense, Aspect and Modality (CHRONOS 9) .
Matsuo, A. & Hollebrandse, B
1999The acquisition of sequence of tense in Japanese. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Child Development (BUCLD 23), A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield & C. Tano (eds), 431–442. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Ogihara, T
1989Temporal Reference in English and Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
1996Tense, Attitudes and Scope. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ogihara, T. & Sharvit, Y
2012Embedded tenses. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, R. Binnick (ed.), 638–668. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Partee, B
1973Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. The Journal of Philosophy 70(18): 601–609. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Percus, O. & Lungu, O
2011Simultaneous analyses for simultaneous present. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Semantics and Linguistics Theory [SALT 20], N. Li & D. Lutz (eds), 735–755. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Roeper, T
1999Universal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2: 169–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmeißer, M
2014Present last. Production-comprehension asymmetries in the acquisition of tense in monolingual French and Italian. Ms, Bergische Universität Wuppertal.
Smith, C
2009The temporal reference of the English futurate. In Text, Time and Context. Selected Papers of Carlota. S. Smith, R.P. Meier, H. Aristar-Dry & E. Destruel (eds), 147–160. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stowell, T
2007The syntactic expression of tense. Lingua 117: 437–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A
1994The change from SOV to SVO in ancient Greek. Language Variation and Change 6: 1–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Valian, V
1991Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children. Cognition 40: 21–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vet, C
1999Le passé simple, le passé composé et les règles d’interprétation discursive. In L’emprise du sens, structures linguistiques et interpretations, M. Plénat, M. Aurnague, A. Condamines, J.-P. Maurel, C. Molinier & C. Muller (eds), 323–336. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2001Deux cas de polysémie: Le passé composé et le futur périphrastique. In Langage et référence, mélanges offerts à Kerstin Jonasson à l’occasion de ses soixante ans, H. Kronning, C. Norén, B. Novén, G. Ransbo, L.-G., Sundell & B. Svane (eds), 697–686. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
von Stechow, A
1995On the proper treatment of tense. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, M. Simons & T. Galloway (eds), 362–386. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
2003Feature deletion under semantic binding: tense, person, and mood under verbal quantifiers. In Proceedings of the 33th Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, M. Kadowaki, S. Kawahara (eds), 397–403. Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
2009Tenses in compositional semantics. In The Expression of Time, W. Klein & P. Li (eds), 129–166. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yang, C
2000Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language . PhD dissertation, MIT.
2011Computational models of language acquisition. In Handbook of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition, J. de Villiers & T. Roeper (eds), 119–154. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar