Article published in:
The Acquisition of the Present
Edited by Dalila Ayoun
[Not in series 196] 2015
► pp. 21–56

Chapter 2. Zero-present under past in child French

Evidence from the future

| Universidade Nova de Lisboa | LLING | Université de Nantes
| Universidade Nova de Lisboa | LLING | Université de Nantes
This chapter discusses novel data from two experimental studies testing the acquisition of futurity and providing evidence in favor of Demirdache and Lungu’s (2009, 2011) zero-tense hypothesis, according to which child grammars display both zero-present and zero-past tenses, alongside indexical present/past tenses. Extending Kratzer (1998), Demirdache and Lungu argue that simultaneous construals of past/present in adult languages arise via a zero-tense analysis of the embedded tense. The claim is that while some adult languages (English, French) allow zero-tense construals of past and others (Japanese) allow zero-tense construals of present, child French in particular and, by hypothesis, child language in general, allows zero-tense construals of both past and present. We argue that once we admit the existence of a zero-present tense in child French, we expect children to allow non-adult, non-indexical construals of other tenses that have a present component. On the basis of two experiments testing the interpretation of futurity in L1 French, we show that this prediction is borne out.
Published online: 09 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.196.02lun
References
Abusch, D
1988 Sequence of tense, intensionality and scope. In Proceedings of the 7th West Coast Conference for Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 7), H. Borer (ed.), 1–14. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
1994 Sequence of tense revisited: Two semantic accounts of tense in intensional contexts. In Ellipsis, Tense and Questions. DYANA-2, H. Kamp (ed.), 87–139. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
1997 Sequence of tense and temporal de re. Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 1–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Altshuler, D
2008 Narrative effects in Russian indirect reports and what they reveal about the meaning of the past tense. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT 18), T. Friedman & S. Ito (eds), 19–36. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Ayoun, D
2003 Parameter Setting in Language Acquisition. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Copley, B
2009 The Semantics of the Future. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crain, S. & Thornton, R
1998 Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Experiments on the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
De Saussure, L
2011 Le passé composé en usage futur et la pertinence au present. Journal of French language studies 22(2): 189–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Remarques sur l’usage futur du passé composé. Revue Tranel 51: 45–60.Google Scholar
Demirdache, H. & Lungu, O
2009 Sequence of tense in (French) child language. In Linguistic Variation Yearbook 8, J. van Craenenbroeck & J. Rooryck (eds), 101–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Zero-tense vs. indexical construals of the present in French L1. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Tense Across Languages, R. Musan & M. Rathert (eds), 233–256. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, D
1979 Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enç, M
1987 Anchoring conditions for tense. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 633–657.Google Scholar
Grønn, A. & von Stechow, A
2011 Future vs. present in Russian and English adjunct clauses. Scando-Slavica 57(2): 245–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Han, C, Lidz, J. & Musolino, J
2007 V-raising and grammar competition in Korean: Evidence from negation and quantifier scope. Linguistic Inquiry 38(1): 1–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heim, I
1994 Comments on Abusch's theory of tense. In Ellipsis, Tense and Questions, H. Kamp (ed.), 143–170. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Heim, I. & Kratzer, A
1998 Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Hollebrandse, B
2000 The Acquisition of Sequence of Tense. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Kaufmann, S
2005 Conditional truth and future reference. Journal of Semantics 22: 231–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Khomitsevich, O
2008 Dependencies across Phases: From Sequence of Tense to Restrictions on Movement. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Kratzer, A
1998 More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, D. Strolovitch & A. Lawson (eds), 92–110. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Kroch, A
1989 Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kusumoto, K
1999 Tense in Embedded Contexts. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Lewis, D
1979 Attitudes de dicto and de se. The Philosophical Review 88: 513–543. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lungu, O
2008 Tense in embedded contexts: The case of Romanian. In Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics X(1), A. Cornilescu (ed.), 21–37. Bucharest: University of Bucharest.Google Scholar
2012 Tense in Embedded Contexts: The View from (French) Child Language. PhD dissertation, Université de Nantes.
Lungu, O. Submitted
The embedded present in Romanian: An issue of (non)commitment. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Tense, Aspect and Modality (CHRONOS 9) .
Matsuo, A. & Hollebrandse, B
1999 The acquisition of sequence of tense in Japanese. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Child Development (BUCLD 23), A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield & C. Tano (eds), 431–442. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Ogihara, T
1989 Temporal Reference in English and Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
1996 Tense, Attitudes and Scope. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ogihara, T. & Sharvit, Y
2012 Embedded tenses. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, R. Binnick (ed.), 638–668. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Partee, B
1973 Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. The Journal of Philosophy 70(18): 601–609. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Percus, O. & Lungu, O
2011 Simultaneous analyses for simultaneous present. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Semantics and Linguistics Theory [SALT 20], N. Li & D. Lutz (eds), 735–755. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Roeper, T
1999 Universal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2: 169–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmeißer, M
2014 Present last. Production-comprehension asymmetries in the acquisition of tense in monolingual French and Italian. Ms, Bergische Universität Wuppertal.
Smith, C
2009 The temporal reference of the English futurate. In Text, Time and Context. Selected Papers of Carlota. S. Smith, R.P. Meier, H. Aristar-Dry & E. Destruel (eds), 147–160. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stowell, T
2007 The syntactic expression of tense. Lingua 117: 437–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A
1994 The change from SOV to SVO in ancient Greek. Language Variation and Change 6: 1–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Valian, V
1991 Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children. Cognition 40: 21–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vet, C
1999 Le passé simple, le passé composé et les règles d’interprétation discursive. In L’emprise du sens, structures linguistiques et interpretations, M. Plénat, M. Aurnague, A. Condamines, J.-P. Maurel, C. Molinier & C. Muller (eds), 323–336. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2001 Deux cas de polysémie: Le passé composé et le futur périphrastique. In Langage et référence, mélanges offerts à Kerstin Jonasson à l’occasion de ses soixante ans, H. Kronning, C. Norén, B. Novén, G. Ransbo, L.-G., Sundell & B. Svane (eds), 697–686. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
von Stechow, A
1995 On the proper treatment of tense. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, M. Simons & T. Galloway (eds), 362–386. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
2003 Feature deletion under semantic binding: tense, person, and mood under verbal quantifiers. In Proceedings of the 33th Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, M. Kadowaki, S. Kawahara (eds), 397–403. Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
2009 Tenses in compositional semantics. In The Expression of Time, W. Klein & P. Li (eds), 129–166. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yang, C
2000 Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language . PhD dissertation, MIT.
2011 Computational models of language acquisition. In Handbook of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition, J. de Villiers & T. Roeper (eds), 119–154. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar