Cover not available
Part of
The Acquisition of the Present
Edited by Dalila Ayoun
[Not in series 196] 2015
► pp. 185–214

Chapter 7. L2 acquisition of English aspect by L1 Arabic speakers

The role of interpretable features at the syntax-semantics interface

| Umm Al-Qura University

This chapter reports on a study that investigates whether L1 Arabic speakers can acquire the English aspectual contrast between the present simple (e.g. ‘plays’) and present progressive (e.g. ‘is playing’). The study was conducted with 143 Saudi Arabic college students of English and eleven native speakers. Following their performance on a cloze test, the L2 learners were assigned to four proficiency levels (beginners, low intermediate, high intermediate, and advanced). They then completed a bimodal timed aspectual interpretation task with 36 short stories (12 progressive, 12 habitual, and 12 fillers) by choosing the sentence with the verb form that best described the story context. Results show that Arabic L2 learners across proficiency levels have successfully learned the tested aspectual contrast. They did not overgeneralize the present simple to progressive and habitual contexts as in L1 Arabic. These results suggest that the interpretive properties of progressive aspect in English are unproblematic for L1 Arabic learners.

Published online: 9 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.196.07alt
References
Adger, D. & Ramchand, G
2005 Merge and Move: Wh-depencies revisited. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 161–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adger, D
2003 Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Al-Thubaiti, K
2007 Age Effects on the Ultimate Attainment of Proficient Arabic Speakers of English. MRes dissertation, Department of Language and Linguistics, Essex University.
Ayoun, D
2005 The acquisition of tense and aspect in L2 French from a Universal Grammar perspective. In Tense and Aspect in Romance Languages: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives [Studies in Bilingualism 29], D. Ayoun & M. R. Salaberry (eds), 79–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 The Second Language Acquisition of French Tense, Aspect, Mood and Modality [AILA Applied Linguistics Series 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ayoun, D. & Rothman, J
2013 Generative approaches to the L2 acquisition of temporal-aspectual-mood systems. In Research Design and Methodology in Studies on L2 Tense and Aspect, M. R. Salaberry & Ll. Comajoan (eds), 119–156. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K
2000 Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning and Use. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Belletti, A., Bennati, E. & Sorace, A
2007 Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25(4): 657–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benmamoun, E
2000 The Feature Structure of Functional Categories: A Comparative Study of Arabic Dialects. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crain, S. & Thornton, R
1998 Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Research on the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Déchaine, R.-M. & Manfredi, V
2000 Interpreting null tense. Paper presented at the Roundtable on the Syntax of Tense and Aspect, University of Paris.
Fassi-Fehri, A
2004 Temporal/aspectual interaction and variation across Arabic heights. In The Syntax of Time, J. Guéron & J. Lecarme (eds), 235–257. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R
2000 Persistent selective fossilisation in second language acquisition and the optimal design of the language faculty. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 34: 75–90.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., Casillas, G., Hattori, H., Hawthorne, J., Husted, R., Lozano, C., Okamoto, A., Thomas, E. & Yamada, K
2008 The semantic effects of verb raising and its consequences in second language grammars. In The Role of Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition, J. M. Liceras, H. Zobl & H. Goodluck (eds), 328–351. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. & Hattori, H
2006 Interpretation of English multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers: A missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research 22(3): 269–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T. & Montrul, S
2009 Article use and generic reference: Parallels between L1 and L2 acquisition. In Second Language Acquisition of Articles: Empirical Findings and Theoretical Implications [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 49], M. del Pilar García-Mayo & R. Hawkins (eds), 147–173 Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D
2000 Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, J. Archibald (ed.), 102–129. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lasnik, H
2007 Verbal morphology: Syntactic structures meets the minimalist program. In Minimalist Syntax: The Essential Readings, Ž. Bošković & H. Lasnik (eds), 263–277. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Li, P. & Shirai, Y
2000 The Acquisition of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liszka, S. A
2009 Associating meaning to form in advanced L2 speakers. In Representational Deficits in SLA: Studies in Honor of Roger Hawkins [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 47], N. Snape, Y.-K. I. Leung & M. Sharwood Smith (eds), 229–246. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lozano, C
2006 Focus and split intransitivity: The acquisition of word order alternations and unaccusativity in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research 22(2): 145–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Selective deficits at the syntax-discourse interface. In Representational Deficits in SLA: Studies in Honor of Roger Hawkins [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 47], N. Snape, Y.-K. I. Leung & M. Sharwood Smith (eds), 127–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Foote, R. & Perpiñán, S
2008 Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning 58(3): 503–553. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. & Slabakova, R
2003 Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers: An investigation of the preterite/imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25(3): 351–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, D. & Torrego, E
2001 I to C movement: Causes and consequences. In Ken Hale, a Life in Language, M. Kenstowicz (ed.), 355–426. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prévost, P. & White, L
2000a Accounting for morphological variation in second language acquisition: Truncation or missing inflection? In The Acquisition of Syntax, M.-A. Friedemann & L. Rizzi (eds), 202–235. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2000b Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research 16(2): 103–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rouveret, A
2012 VP ellipsis, phases and the syntax of morphology. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30(3): 897–963. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubin, A.D
2004 Studies in Semitic Grammaticalization. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Schwartz, B.D. & Sprouse, R.A
1994 Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 8], T. Hoekstra & B. D. Schwartz (eds), 317–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research 12(1): 40–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R
2001 Telicity in the Second Language [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 26]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Semantic evidence for functional categories in interlanguage grammars. Second Language Research 19(1): 42–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Meaning in the Second Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A
1993 Incomplete vs. divergent representations of unaccusativity in non-native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research 9(1): 22–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Syntactic optionality at interfaces. In Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 265] L. Cornips & K. P. Corrigan (eds), 55–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. & Filiaci, F
2006 Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research 22(3): 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Towell, R. & Hawkins, R
1994 Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I.-M. & Dimitrakopoulou, M
2007 The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 23(2): 215–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I.-M. & Sorace, A
2006 Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia & C. Zaller (eds), 653–664. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Travis, L
2008 The role of features in syntactic theory and language variation. In The Role of Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition, J. Liceras, H. Zobl & H. Goodluck (eds), 22–47. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z
1967 Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
White, L
2003 Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 6(2): 129–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Grammatical theory: Interfaces and L2 knowledge. In The New Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (eds), 49–68. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
2011 Second language acquisition at the interfaces. Lingua 121(4): 577–590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuan, B
2001 The status of thematic verbs in the second language acquisition of Chinese: Against inevitability of thematic-verb raising in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 17(3): 248–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Al-Thubaiti, Kholoud A
2019. Selective vulnerability in very advanced L2 grammars: Evidence from VPE constraints. Second Language Research 35:2 ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Dudley, Amber & Roumyana Slabakova
2020. The Present Tense in English, Again. In Formal Linguistics and Language Education [Educational Linguistics, 43], ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Dudley, Amber & Roumyana Slabakova
2020. Aspectual contrasts in the Englishpresent tense revisited. Pedagogical Linguistics 1:1 ► pp. 66 ff. DOI logo
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2018. Tense and aspect in Second Language Acquisition and learner corpus research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2020. Tense and aspect in Second Language Acquisition and learner corpus research. In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
SHKURENKO, Anastasiia & Filiz CELE
2022. L2 acquisition of Russian aspect by L1 Turkish speakers. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi :31 ► pp. 1561 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.