Cover not available
Part of
The Acquisition of the Present
Edited by Dalila Ayoun
[Not in series 196] 2015
► pp. 289–334

Chapter 10. The simple present and the expression of temporality in L1 English and L2 English oral narratives

When form meets discourse

| Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
The simple/progressive aspectual contrast is fundamental in present-based narratives in English: the simple present encodes temporally sequenced events whereas the progressive creates a close-up effect and introduces a perspective “from within”, often associated with the subjective viewpoint of the narrator (Chuquet 1994). This dichotomy is, nonetheless, cancelled in certain types of oral narratives, such as the narrative commentaries, where the simple present has been shown to take over some of the functional-semantic scope of the progressive form (Williams 2002). On the basis of a corpus of 12 L1 English and 12 L2 English oral narratives elicited by means of a picture book, we show that the simple present is used as a default form in L1 English narratives, irrespective of the narrative function of the predicate or of its inherent semantic properties. In L2 English, the advanced French-speaking learners differ from the English native speakers in their choice of temporal linkage, which favors the use of the progressive form, and struggle to construct a cohesive temporal perspective in their stories. This indicates that discourse use of tense-aspect morphology remains a challenge for advanced learners, in part because it is informed by information selection patterns embedded in the learners’ L1.
Published online: 9 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.196.10vra
References
Andersen, R.W.
1983 Transfer to somewhere. In Language Transfer in Language Learning, S.M. Gass & L. Selinker (eds), 177–201. Rowley MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
1993 Four operating principles and input distribution as explanations for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. In Progression and Regression in Language. Sociocultural, Neuropsychological and Linguistic Perspectives. K. Hyltenstam & A. Viberg (eds), 309–339. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ayoun, D. & Salaberry, R.
2008 Acquisition of English tense-aspect morphology by advanced French instructed learners. Language Learning 58(3): 555–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bamberg, M. & Marchman, V.
1991 Binding and unfolding: Towards the linguistic construction of narrative discourse. Discourse Processes 14: 277–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
1992 The telling of a tale: Discourse structure and tense use in learners’ narrative. Pragmatics and Language Learning 3: 144–161.Google Scholar
1998 Narrative structure and lexical aspect. Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 471–508.Google Scholar
2000 Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning and Use. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2002 Analyzing aspect. In The L2 Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology, R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (eds), 129–153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Text to task. In Research Design and Methodology in Studies on L2 Tense and Aspect, M. Salaberry & L. Comajoan (eds), 219–269. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Bergström, A.
1996 Acquisition of tense and aspect in second language and foreign language learning: Learner narratives in ESL and FFL. The Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes 52(2): 308–330.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Reynolds, D.W.
1995 The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect. TESOL Quarterly 29(1): 107–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, R.A. & Slobin, D.I.
(eds) 1994 Relating Events in Narrative: A Cross-linguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, P.M.
2000 The progressive in Romance, as compared with English. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Ö. Dahl (ed.), 559–604. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Binnick, R.I.
2008 Aspect and aspectuality. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, B. Aarts & A. McMahon (eds), 224–268. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Broccias, C.
2006 The construal of simultaneity in English with special reference to as-clauses. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 4: 97–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M. & Lambert, M.
2003 Information structure in narratives and the role of grammaticized knowledge. A study of adult French and German learners of English. In Information Structure and the Dynamics of Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism 26], C. Dimroth & M. Starren (eds), 267–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Reorganizing principles of information structure in advanced L2s. In Educating for Advanced Foreign Language Capacities. Constructs, Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, H. Byrnes, H. Weger-Guntharp & K. Sprang (eds), 54–73. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Chuquet, H.
1994 Le présent de narration en anglais et en français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Collins, L.
2002 The roles of L1 influence and lexical aspect in the acquisition of temporal morphology. Language Learning 52(1): 43–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 The particulars on universals: a comparison of the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology among Japanese- and French-speaking learners of English. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes 61(2): 251–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comajoan, L.
2013 Defining and coding data: Narrative discourse grounding in L2 studies. In Research Design and Methodology in Studies on L2 Tense and Aspect, M. Salaberry & L. Comajoan (eds), 309–355. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B.
1976 Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cowper, E.
1998 The simple present tense in English: A unified treatment. Studia Linguistica 52(1): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curell, H.
2002 The temporal interpretation of narratives: A case study. In Linguistics on the Way into the Third Millennium. Proceedings of the 34th Linguistics Colloquium, Germersheim 1999, R. Rapp (ed.), 591–598. London: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö.
1985 Tense and Aspect System. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Declerck, R.
1979 Aspects and bounded/unbounded (telic/atelic) distinction. Linguistics 17: 761–794. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Depraetere, I.
1995 On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity. Linguistics and Philosophy 18(1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dry, H.
1992 Foregrounding: An assessment. In Language in Context: Essays for Robert E. Longacre, S.J. Hwang & W.R. Merrifield (eds), 435–450. Arlington TX: The Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Goldschnieder, J.M. & DeKeyser, R.
2001 Explaining the ‘natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning 55 (Supplement 1): 26–77.Google Scholar
Hirtle, W.H.
1988 Events, time and the simple form. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique 17(1): 85–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.J.
1979 Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In Discourse and Syntax, T. Givón (ed.), 213–241. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Housen, A.
2002 The development of tense-aspect in English as a second language and the variable influence of inherent aspect. In The L2 Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 27], R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (eds), 155–197. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamp, H. & Rohrer, C.
1983 Tense in texts. In Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze & A. von Stechow (eds), 250–269. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, W. & Perdue, C.
1997 The basic variety (or couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research 13: 301–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lachaux, F.
2005 La périphrase être en train de, perspective interlinguale (anglais-français): une modalisation de l’aspect? In Les périphrases verbales, H. Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot & N. Le Querler (eds), 119–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, M.
1997 En route vers le bilinguisme. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère 9: 147–172.Google Scholar
Lascarides, A. & Asher, N.
1993 Temporal interpretation, discourse relation and common sense entailment. Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 437–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leclercq, P.
2007 L’influence de la L1 dans l’organisation des discours chez les apprenants avancés/quasi-bilingues: Le cas de l’aspect ‘en déroulement’ en français et en anglais. Doctoral dissertation, Université de Paris 8, Vincennes Saint Denis.
Li, P. & Shirai, Y.
2000 The Acquisition of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.J.
2000 The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, 3rd edn. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mayer, M.
1969 Frog, Where Are You? New York NY: Dial Press.
Michaelis, L.A.
2008 Tense in English. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, B. Aarts & A. McMahon (eds), 220–243. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. & Gilabert, R.
2011 More evidence concerning the Aspect Hypothesis: The acquisition of English progressive aspect by Catalan-Spanish instructed learners. IRAL 49(3): 241–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakhimovsky, A.
1988 Aspect, aspectual class, and the temporal structure of narrative. Computational Linguistics 14(2): 29–43.Google Scholar
Noyau, C., Lorenzo de, C., Kihlstedt, M., Paprocka, U., Espinar Sanz, G. and Schneider, R.
2005 Two dimensions of the representation of complex event structures: Granularity and condensation. Towards a typology of textual production in L1 and L2. In The Structure of Learner Varieties, H. Hendriks (ed.), 157–201. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partee, B. H.
1984 Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 7(3): 243–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez Saldanya, M.
2002 Les relacions temporals i aspectuals. In Gramàtica del català contemporani, vol.3, J. Solà, M.-R. Lloret, J. Mascaró & M. Pérez Saldanya (eds), 2567–2662. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T.
1984 Principles of Gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative Texts. Linguistics 22: 779–809.Google Scholar
Robison, R.E.
1995 The Aspect Hypothesis revisited: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect marking in interlanguage. Applied Linguistics 16.3: 344–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990 The primacy of aspect. Aspectual marking in English interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 315–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohde, A.
1996 The Aspect Hypothesis and the emergence of tense distinctions in naturalistic L2 acquisition. Linguistics 34: 1115–1137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, M.R.
2011 Assessing the effect of lexical aspect and grounding on the acquisition of L2 Spanish past tense morphology among L1 English speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(2): 184–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, M.R. & Comajoan, L.
(eds) 2013 Research Design and Methodology in Studies on L2 Tense and Aspect. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmiedtová, B. & Flecken, M.
2008 Aspectual concepts across languages: Some considerations for second language learning. In Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar, S. de Knop & T. de Rycker (eds), 357–384. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Slobin, D.I.
1996 From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (eds), 70–96. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Smith, C.S.
1991 The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C.
2003 Linguistic structure and information organization: The case of very advanced learners. In EUROSLA Yearbook, Vol. 3, S. Foster-Cohen & S. Pekarek Doehler (eds), 183–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C. & Carroll, M.
2006 The impact of grammatical temporal categories on ultimate attainment in L2 learning. In Educating for Advanced Foreign Language Capacities. Constructs, curriculum, instruction, assessment, H. Byrnes, H. Weger-Guntharp & K. Sprang (eds), 40–53. Washington DC : Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
von Stutterheim, C. & Lambert, M.
2005 Cross-linguistic analysis of temporal perspectives in text production. In The Structure of Learner Varieties, H. Hendriks (ed.), 203–230. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z.
1957 Verbs and times. In Linguistics and Philosophy, Z. Vendler (ed.), 97–121. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vraciu, E.A.
2012 Tense-aspect Morphology in the Advanced L2 English Variety: Exploring Semantic, Discourse and Cross-linguistic Factors. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona/Université de Paris Ouest Nanterre la Défense.
2013 Exploring the upper limits of the Aspect Hypothesis: Tense-aspect morphology in the advanced L2 English variety. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 4(2): 256–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, C.
2002 Non-progressive aspect in English in commentaries and demonstrations using the present tense. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1235–1256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, N.
1982 CHP. The Conversational Historical Present in American English Narrative. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Dudley, Amber & Roumyana Slabakova
2020. Aspectual contrasts in the Englishpresent tense revisited. Pedagogical Linguistics 1:1 ► pp. 66 ff. DOI logo
Liao, Yiyun, Katinka Dijkstra & Rolf A. Zwaan
2023. Linguistic and non-linguistic cues in motion event endpoint description: The selection between English to and towards. Memory & Cognition 51:4 ► pp. 982 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.