Children’s hypertext comprehension
Eliane Segers | | | Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands | Department of Instructional Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
The present chapter gives an overview of the literature on hypertext comprehension, children’s hypertext comprehension and individual variation therein, ending with a perspective for future research. Hypertext comprehension requires the reader to make bridging inferences between the different parts of the text, which requires more background knowledge than when reading a linear text. Especially readers low in prior knowledge thus experience problems in the comprehension of hypertext, but these are also the ones who benefit from a hierarchical structure or a graphical overview. This is also the case for children. Future research should address the comprehension of networked hypertexts, also in groups of children with comprehension problems. For these groups, intervention research is needed to arrive at methods to improve hypertext comprehension.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical framework of hypertext comprehension
- 3.Adult hypertext comprehension
- 4.Children’s hypertext comprehension
- 5.Discussion and future perspectives
-
References
References
Afflerbach, P., & Cho, B. Y
(
2009)
Identifying and describing constructively responsive comprehension strategies in new and traditional forms of reading.
Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension, 69–90.

Amadieu, F., & Salmerón, L
(
2014)
Concept maps for comprehension and navigation of hypertexts. In
R. Hanewald &
D. Ifenthaler (Eds.),
Digital knowledge maps in education (pp. 41–59). New York: Springer.


Amadieu, F., Salmerón, L., Cegarra, J., Paubel, P. V., Lemarié, J., & Chevalier, A
(
2015)
Learning from concept mapping and hypertext: An eye tracking study.
Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 100–112.

Amadieu, F., Van Gog, T., Paas, F., Tricot, A., & Mariné, C
(
2009)
Effects of prior knowledge and concept-map structure on disorientation, cognitive load, and learning.
Learning and Instruction, 19(5), 376–386.


Blom, H., Segers, E., Hermans, D., Knoors, H., & Verhoeven, L
(
2017)
Hypertext comprehension of deaf and hard-of-hearing students and students with specific language impairment.
Research in Developmental Disabilities.


Calisir, F., Eryazici, M., & Lehto, M. R
(
2008)
The effects of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on computer-based learning.
Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 439–450.


Cuddihy, E., & Spyridakis, J. H
(
2012)
The effect of visual design and placement of intra-article navigation schemes on reading comprehension and website user perceptions.
Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1399–1409.


DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J. A
(
2007)
Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review.
Computers in human behavior, 23(3), 1616–1641.


de Koning, B. B., Bos, L. T., Wassenburg, S. I., & van der Schoot, M
(
2016)
Effects of a reading strategy training aimed at improving mental simulation in primary school children.
Educational Psychology Review, 1–21.

Droop, M., van Elsäcker, W., Voeten, M. J., & Verhoeven, L
(
2016)
Long-term effects of strategic reading instruction in the intermediate elementary grades.
Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(1), 77–102.


Fajardo, I., Cañas, J. J., Salmerón, L., & Abascal, J
(
2006)
Improving deaf users’ accessibility in hypertext information retrieval: are graphical interfaces useful for them? Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(6), 455–467.


Foltz, P. W
(
1996)
Comprehension, coherence, and strategies in hypertext and linear text. In
J.-F. Rouet,
J. J. Levonen,
A. P. Dillon, &
R. J. Spiro (Eds.),
Hypertext and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Fesel, S. S., Segers, E., De Leeuw, L., & Verhoeven, L
Fesel, S. S., Segers, E., Clariana, R. B., & Verhoeven, L
(
2015)
Quality of children’s knowledge representations in digital text comprehension: Evidence from Pathfinder networks.
Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 135–146.


Fesel, S. S., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L
(
2017)
Individual variation in children’s reading comprehension across digital text types.
Journal of Research in Reading.


Kintsch, W
(
1988)
The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model.
Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182.


Klois, S. S., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L
(
2013)
How hypertext fosters children’s knowledge acquisition: Role of graphic overview and text structure.
Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2047–2057.


Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J
(
2005)
The Web as an information resource in K–12 education: Strategies for supporting students in searching and processing information.
Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 285–328.


Lawless, K. A., Mills, R., & Brown, S. W
(
2002)
Children’s hypertext navigation strategies.
Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 274–284.


Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., & Timbrell, N
(
2015)
The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement gap.
Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 37–59.


Madrid, R. I., Van Oostendorp, H., & Melguizo, M. C. P
(
2009)
The effects of the number of links and navigation support on cognitive load and learning with hypertext: The mediating role of reading order.
Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 66–75.


Mangen, A
(
2008)
Hypertext fiction reading: haptics and immersion.
Journal of research in reading, 31(4), 404–419.


McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W
(
1996)
Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text.
Cognition and instruction, 14(1), 1–43.


Naumann, J., Richter, T., Christmann, U., & Groeben, N
(
2008)
Working memory capacity and reading skill moderate the effectiveness of strategy training in learning from hypertext.
Learning and Individual Differences, 18(2), 197–213.


Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J
(
2014)
Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension.
Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37.


Perfetti, C. A., Britt, M. A., & Georgi, M. C
(
1995)
Text-based learning and reasoning: Studies in history. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A
(
1999)
Towards a theory of documents representation. In
H. van Oostendorp &
S. Goldman (Eds.),
The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 99–122 ). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Rouet, J. F., & Britt, M. A
(
2014)
Learning from multiple documents.
Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 2, 813–841.


Salmerón, L., Baccino, T., Cañas, J. J., Madrid, R. I., & Fajardo, I
(
2009)
Do graphical overviews facilitate or hinder comprehension in hypertext? Computers & Education, 53(4), 1308–1319.


Salmerón, L., & García, V
(
2011)
Reading skills and children’s navigation strategies in hypertext.
Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1143–1151.


Salmerón, L., & García, V
(
2012)
Children’s reading of printed text and hypertext with navigation overviews: The role of comprehension, sustained attention, and visuo-spatial abilities.
Journal of Educational Computing Research, 47(1), 33–50.


Salmerón, L., Kintsch, W., & Kintsch, E
(
2010)
Self-regulation and link selection strategies in hypertext.
Discourse Processes, 47(3), 175–211.


Salmerón, L., Naumann, J., García, V., & Fajardo, I
(
2016)
Scanning and deep processing of information in hypertext: an eye tracking and cued retrospective think‐aloud study.
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.


Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P
(
2007)
Learner control in hypermedia environments.
Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 285–307.


Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L
(
2015)
Benefits of technology-enhanced learning for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. In
M. Marschark &
H. Knoors (Eds.),
Educating deaf students: Creating a global evidence base (pp. 481–502). Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Shapiro, A., & Niederhauser, D
(
2004)
Learning from hypertext: Research issues and findings.
Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 2, 605–620.

Spiro, R., Feltovitch, P., Jacobson, M., & Coulson, R
(
1992)
Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In
T. Duffy &
D. Jonassen (Eds.),
Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 57–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Urakami, J., & Krems, J. F
(
2012)
How hypertext reading sequences affect understanding of causal and temporal relations in story comprehension.
Instructional Science, 40(2), 277–295.


Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W.
(
1983)
Strategies of discourse comprehension (pp. 11–12). New York: Academic Press.

Vörös, Z., Rouet, J. F., & Pléh, C
(
2011)
Effect of high-level content organizers on hypertext learning.
Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 2047–2055.


Walhout, J., Brand-Gruwel, S., Jarodzka, H., van Dijk, M., de Groot, R., & Kirschner, P. A
(
2015)
Learning and navigating in hypertext: Navigational support by hierarchical menu or tag cloud? Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 218–227.


Wolf, M., Ullman-Shade, C., & Gottwald, S
(
2012)
The emerging, evolving reading brain in a digital culture: Implications for new readers, children with reading difficulties, and children without schools.
Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 11(3), 230–240.


Woods, D. D
(
1984)
Visual momentum: A concept to improve the cognitive coupling of person and computer.
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 21(3), 229–244.


Zumbach, J., & Mohraz, M
(
2008)
Cognitive load in hypermedia reading comprehension: Influence of text type and linearity.
Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 875–887.


Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Salmerón, Ladislao & Ana Llorens
2019.
Instruction of Digital Reading Strategies Based on Eye-Movements Modeling Examples.
Journal of Educational Computing Research 57:2
► pp. 343 ff.

Yadav, Savita, Pinaki Chakraborty, Lokesh Meena & Deepanshu Yadav
2022.
Children’s Ability to Read from Computers and Smartphones.
Journal of Educational Technology Systems 50:4
► pp. 521 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.