Chapter published in:
Developmental Perspectives in Written Language and Literacy: In honor of Ludo Verhoeven
Edited by Eliane Segers and Paul van den Broek
[Not in series 206] 2017


Al Otaiba, S., Connor, C., Folsom, J. S., Wanzek, J., Greulich, L., Schatschneider, C., & Wagner, R. K.
(2014) To wait in Tier 1 or to intervene immediately: A randomized experiment examining first grade response to intervention (RTI) in reading. Exceptional Children, 81(1), 11–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blomert, L.
(2011) The neural signature of orthographic–phonological binding in successful and failing reading development. NeuroImage, 57, 695–703. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P.
(1985) Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B., Fielding-Barnsley, R., & Ashley, L.
(2000) Effects of preschool phoneme identity training after six years: Outcome level distinguished from rate of response. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 659–667. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
Duff, F., Hulme, C., Grainger, K., Hardwick, S. J., Miles, J. N., & Snowling, M. J.
(2014) Reading and language intervention for children at risk of dyslexia: A randomised controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 1234–1243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dutch Inpectorate
(2007) De staat van het onderwijs [The state of education]. Onderwijsverslag 2005–2006. Utrecht: Inspectie van het Onderwijs.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T.
(2001) Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elbro, C., & Petersen, D. K.
(2004) Long-term effects of phoneme awareness and letter sound training. An intervention study with children at risk of dyslexia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 660–670. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eleveld, M. A.
(2005) At risk for dyslexia. The role of phonological abilities, letter knowledge, and speed of serial naming in early intervention and diagnosis. State University Groningen, the Netherlands (PhD-thesis). Leuven: Garant Publishers.
Fielding-Barnsley, R., & Purdie, N.
(2003) Early intervention in the home for children at risk of reading failure. Support for Learning, 18, 77–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, J. M.
(2006) The need for respone to instruction models for learning disabilities. Perspectives. The International Dyslexia Association, 12–15.Google Scholar
Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P.
(1998) The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, L. S., & Vaughn, S.
(2012) Responsiveness-to-intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 195–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gersons-Wolfensberger, D. C. M., & Ruijssenaars, A. J. J.
(1997) Definition and treatment of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 209–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hatcher, P. J., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J.
(2004) Explicit phoneme training combined with phonic reading instruction helps young children at risk of reading failure. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(2), 338–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hindson, B. A., Byrne, B., Fielding-Barnsley, R., Newman, C., Hine, D. W., & Shankweiler, D. P.
(2005) Assesment and early instruction of preschool children at risk for reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97 (4), 687–704. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martens, V. E. G., & de Jong, P. F.
(2006) The effect of word length effect on lexical decision in dyslexic and normal reading children. Brain and Language, 98, 140–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonald Connor, C., Morrison, F. J., Fishman, B., Crowe, E. C., Al Otaiba, S., & Schatschneider, C.
(2013) A longitudinal cluster-randomized controlled study on the accumulating effects of individualized literacy instruction on students’ reading from first through third grade. Psychological Science, 24(8), 1408–1419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
NICHD. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
(2000) Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An Evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Pennington, B. F.
(2006) From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders. Cognition, 101(2), 385–413. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Regtvoort, A.G.F.M., & van der Leij, A.
(2007) Early intervention with children of dyslexic parents: Effects of computer-based reading instruction at home on literacy acquisition. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(1), 35–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Regtvoort, A., Zijlstra, H., & van der Leij, A.
(2013) The effectiveness of a two-year supplementary tutor-assisted computerized intervention on the reading development of beginning readers at risk for reading difficulties: A randomized controlled trial. Dyslexia, 19, 256–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saine, N. L., Lerkkanen, M-K., Ahonen, T., Tolvanen, A., & Lyytinen, H.
(2011) Computer-assisted remedial reading intervention for school beginners at risk for reading disability. Child Development, 82(3), 1013–1028. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, D. M., Vellutino, F. R., Small, S. G., Fanuele, D. P., & Sweeney, J. M.
(2005) Severe reading difficulties - can they be prevented? A comparison of prevention and intervention approaches. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal, 13(4), 209–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scheltinga, F., van der Leij, A., & Struiksma, A. J. C.
(2010) Predictors of response to intervention of word reading fluency in Dutch. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(3), 212–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snowling, M. J., & Melby-Lervåg, M.
(2016) Oral language deficits in familial dyslexia: A meta-analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 498–545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spinelli, D., De Luca, M., Di Filippo, G., Mancini, M., Martelli, M., & Zoccolotti, P.
(2005) Length effect in word naming in reading: Role of reading experience and reading deficit in Italian readers. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27(2), 217–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E.
(1986) Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1994) Are discrepancy-based definitions of dyslexia empirically defensible? In K. P. Van den Bos, L. S. Siegel, D. J. Bakker, & D. L. Share (Eds.), Current directions in dyslexia research (pp. 15–30). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Struiksma, A. J. C., van der Leij, A., & Stoel, R.
(2009) Response to fluency-oriented intervention of Dutch poor readers. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 541–548. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swagerman, S. C., van Bergen, E., Dolan, C., de Geus, E. J., Koenis, M. M., Hulshoff Pol, H. E., & Boomsma, D. I.
(2015) Genetic transmission of reading ability. Brain & Language. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tannock, R.
(2013) Rethinking ADHD and LD in DSM-5 : Proposed changes in diagnostic criteria. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 5–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tijms, J.
(2011) Effectiveness of computer-based treatment for dyslexia in a clinical care setting: Outcomes and moderators. Educational Psychology, 31(7), 873–896. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torgesen, J. K.
(2005) Recent discoveries from research on remedial interventions for children with dyslexia. In M. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 521–537). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. K. S., & Conway, T.
(2001) Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(1), 33–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tunmer, W. E., Chapman, J. W., Greaney, K. T., Prochnow, J. E., & Arrow, A. W.
(2013) Why the New Zealand National Literacy Strategy has failed and what can be done about it: Evidence from the progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) 2011 and Reading Recovery monitoring reports. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 18(2), 139–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Bergen, E., van der Leij, A., & de Jong, P. F.
(2014) The intergenerational multiple deficit model and the case of dyslexia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(article 346), 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Leij, A.
(2013) Dyslexia and early intervention: What did we learn from the Dutch Dyslexia Programme? Dyslexia, 19, 241–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Leij, A., & van Daal, V.
(1999) Automatization aspects of dyslexia: Speed limitation in word identification, sensitivity to increasing task demands, and orthographic compensation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 417–428. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Otterloo, S. G., & van der Leij, A.
(2009) Dutch home-based pre-reading intervention with children at familial risk of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 59, 169–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Otterloo, S. G., van der Leij, A., & Veldkamp, E.
(2006) Treatment integrity in a home-based pre-reading intervention programme. Dyslexia, 12, 155–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Otterloo, S. G., van der Leij, A., & Henrichs, L. F.
(2009) Early home-based intervention in the Netherlands for children at familial risk of dyslexia. Dyslexia, 15, 187–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M.
(2004) Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Zhang, H., & Schatschneider, C.
(2008) Using response to kindergarten and first grade intervention to identify children at-risk for long-term reading difficulties. Reading & Writing, 21, 437–480. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & Keuning, J.
(2014) Onderkenning van dyslexie [Identification of dyslexia]. In L. Verhoeven, P. F. De Jong, & F. Wijnen (Red.), Dyslexie 2.0 (pp. 19–36). Antwerpen-Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
Willems, G., Poelmans, H., Richardson, U., & Blomert, L.
(2008) Evaluatie van een voorschoolse training van kinderen met risico voor dyslexie [Evaluation of a preschool training of children with risk of dyslexia]. In L. Verhoeven & H. Wentink (Red.), Onderkenning en aanpak van leesproblemen en dyslexie [Identification and remedy of reading difficulties and dyslexia] (pp. 99–116). Antwerpen-Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
Wolff, U.
(2011) Effects of a randomized reading intervention study: An application of structural equation modeling. Dyslexia, 17(4), 295–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zigmond, N.
(1978) Remediation of dyslexia: A discussion. In A. L. Benton & D. L. Pearl (Eds.), Dyslexia. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zijlstra, H.
(2015) Early grade learning: The role of teacher-child interaction and tutor-assisted intervention (academisch proefschrift). Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar