Chapter published in:
Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches
Edited by Peter Bakker, Finn Borchsenius, Carsten Levisen and Eeva Sippola
[Not in series 211] 2017
► pp. 533
References

References

Aboh, E. O.
2009Competition and selection. That’s all! In Aboh & Smith (eds), 317–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015The Emergence of Hybrid Grammars. Language Contact and Change [Cambridge Approaches to Language Contact]. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aboh, E.
2016Creole distinctiveness: A dead end. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 31(2): 400–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aboh, E. O. & Ansaldo, U.
2007The role of typology in language creation: A descriptive take. In Ansaldo, Matthews & Lim (eds), 39–66.Google Scholar
Aboh, E. O. & Smith, N. S. H.
(eds) 2009Complex Processes in New Languages [Creole Language Library 35]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Non-iconic reduplications in eastern Gbe and Surinam. In Surviving the Middle Passage. The West Africa-Surinam Sprachbund, P. C. Muysken & N. S. H. Smith (eds), 241–260. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ansaldo U. & Matthews, S.
2001Typical creoles and simple languages: The case of Sinitic. Linguistic Typology 5(2–3): 311–325.Google Scholar
2007Deconstructing creole: The rationale. In Ansaldo, Matthews & Lim (eds), 39–66.Google Scholar
Ansaldo, U., Matthews, S. & Lim, L.
(eds) 2007Deconstructing Creole [Typological Studies in Language 73]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arends, J.
1989Syntactic Developments in Sranan: Creolization as a Gradual Process. PhD dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar
1993Towards a gradualist model of creolisation. In Atlantic Meets Pacific: A Global View of Pidginization and Creolisation [Creole Language Library 11], F. Byrne & J. Holm (eds), 371–380. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2001Simple grammars, complex languages. Linguistic Typology 5(2–3): 180–182.Google Scholar
Arends, Jacques & Perl, Matthias
(eds) 1995Early Suriname Creole Texts. A Collection of 18th-century Sranan and Saramaccan Documents [Bibliotheca Ibero- Americana 49]. Frankfurt: Vervuert.Google Scholar
Baker, P.
1990Off target? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 5(1): 107–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993Australian influence on Melanesian Pidgin English. Te Reo 36: 3–67.Google Scholar
2001No creolisation without prior pidginisation. Te Reo 44: 31–50.Google Scholar
Baker, P. & Huber, M.
2001Atlantic, Pacific, and world-wide features in English-lexicon contact languages. English World-Wide 22(2): 157–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. & Fon Sing, G.
(eds) 2007The Making of Mauritian Creole: Analyses Diachroniques a Partir Des Texts Anciens. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Baker, P. & Mühlhäusler, P.
2013The creole legacy of a bounteous mutineer: Edward Young’s Caribbean contribution to the language of Pitcairn and Norfolk Islands. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 45(2): 170–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, P.
1987Autonomous Languages. Signed and Spoken Languages Created by Children in the light of Bickerton’s Bioprogram Hypothesis [Publikaties van het Instituut voor Algemene Taalwetenschap 53]. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
2003Pidgin inflectional morphology and its implications for creole morphology. Yearbook of Morphology 2002: 3–33. Special section on Pidgins and Creoles, Ingo Plag (ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
2008Pidgins versus creoles and pidgincreoles. In The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies, S. Kouwenberg & J. V. Singler (eds),130–157. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2014aCreolistics: Back to square one? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 29(1): 177–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014bThree Dutch creoles in comparison. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 26(3): 191–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016You’ve got Gungbe, but we’ve got the numbers: Feature pools show that creoles are still typologically distinct. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 31(2): 419–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bartens, A. & Baker, P.
(eds) 2012Black Through White: African Words and Calques which Survived Slavery in Creoles and Transplanted European Languages. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Becker, A. & Veenstra, T.
2003The survival of inflectional morphology in French-related creoles: The role of SLA processes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25: 283–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D.
1981Roots of Language. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma. Reprinted 2016, Language Science Press.Google Scholar
1984The Language Bioprogram Hypothesis. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7(2): 173–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1986Creoles and West African languages: A case of mistaken identity? In Substrata versus Universals in Creole Genesis [Creole Language Library 1], P. Muysken & N. Smith (eds), 25–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988Creole languages and the bioprogram. In Linguistic Theory: Extensions and Implications [Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, Vol. 2], F. Newmeyer (ed.), 268–84. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1991On the supposed “gradualness” of creole development. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 6: 25–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bøegh, K. F., Daval-Markussen A. & Bakker P.
2016A phylogenetic analysis of stable structural features in West African languages. Studies in African Linguistics 45(1–2): 61–94.Google Scholar
Bollée, A.
1977Le créole Français des Seychelles. Esquisse d’une grammaire – textes – vocabulaire. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Bruyn, A.
2011Grammaticalization in creoles. Ordinary and not-so-ordinary cases. In Language Change in Contact Languages: Grammatical and Prosodic Considerations [Benjamins Current Topics 36], J. C. Clements & S. Gooden (eds). 53–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cabral, A. S.
1995Contact-induced Language Change in the Western Amazon: The Non-genetic Origin of the Kokama Language. PhD dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Chaudenson, R.
1978Les créoles français. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
1992Des îles, des hommes, des langues: Essais sur la créolisation linguistique et culturelle. Paris: L’Harmattan. Revised, English edition 2001, Creolization of Language and Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clements, J. C.
1992Foreigner talk and the origins of pidgin Portuguese. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 7(1): 75–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corum, M.
2015Substrate and Adstrate. The Origins of Spatial Semantics in West African Pidgincreoles [Language Contact and Bilingualism 10]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö.
2004The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity [Studies in Language Companion Series 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Ö. & Velupillai, V.
2013The past tense. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/66 (2 November 2014).
De Mulder, W. & Carlier, A.
2011The grammaticalization of definite articles. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, B. Heine & H. Narrog (eds). Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, M.
2001Morphology in creole genesis: Linguistics and ideology. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, M. Kenstowicz (ed.), 53–122. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2003Against creole exceptionalism. Language 79(2): 391–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005aDo creole languages constitute an exceptional typological class? Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée 10(1): 11–24.Google Scholar
2005bLinguists’ most dangerous myth. The fallacy of creole exceptionalism. Language in Society 34(4): 533–591. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Creole exceptionalism and the (mis)education of the Creole speaker. In The Languages of Africa and the Diaspora: Educating for Language Awareness, J. A. Kleifgen & G. Bond (eds), 124–144. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Delancey, S.
2014Creolization in the divergence of Tibeto-Burman languages. In Trans-Himalayan Linguistics: Historical and Descriptive Linguistics of the Himalayan Area, T. Owen-Smith & N. Hill (eds), 41–70. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Dryer, M. S.
2013Prefixing vs. suffixing in inflectional morphology. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/26 (2 November 2014).
Ehrhart, S. & Revis. M.
2013Tayo. In Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, S. M. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (eds), 271–281. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
Faraclas, N. & Klein, T. B.
(eds) 2009Simplicity and Complexity in Creoles and Pidgins. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A.
1971Absence of copula and the notion of simplicity: A study of normal speech, baby talk, foreigner talk and pidgins. In Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, D. Hymes (ed.), 141–150. Cambridge: CUPGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
1973Prolegomena to any sane creology. In Readings in Creole Studies, I. F. Hancock, E. Polomé, M. Goodman & B. Heine (eds), 3–35. Ghent: Story Scientia.Google Scholar
1981On the development of the numeral ‘one’ as an indefinite marker. Folia Linguistica Historica 2(1): 35–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1982Tense- aspect-modality: The Creole prototype and beyond. In Tense – Aspect: Between Semantics and Pragmatics [Typological Studies in Language 1], Paul Hopper (ed.), 115–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Ontogeny, Neurocognition, Evolution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. H.
1966Synchronic and diachronic universals in phonology. Language 42: 508–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A.
2009Admixture, structural transmission, simplicity and complexity. In Simplicity and Complexity in Creoles and Pidgins, N. Faraclas & T. Klein (eds), 125–152. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Hancock, I. F.
1986The domestic hypothesis, diffusion and componentiality. An account of Atlantic Anglophone creole origins. In Muysken & Smith (eds), 71–102.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
2013aOccurrence of nominal plurality. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/34> (2 November 2014).
2013bIs creole distinctiveness what we want to know about? https://​dlc​.hypotheses​.org​/343 (16 June 2015).
Hay, J. & Bauer L.
2007Phoneme inventory size and population size. Language 83(2): 388–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hazaël-Massieux., M.-C.
2008Textes anciens en créole français de la Caraïbe. Histoire et analyse. Paris: Publibook.Google Scholar
Heine, B.
1997Indefinite articles. In Cognitive Foundations of Grammar, Ch. 4, 66–82. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Holm, J.
1988Pidgins and Creoles, Vol. I: Theory and Structure. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2003Languages in Contact: The Partial Restructuring of Vernaculars. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, B.
2012Origins of a Creole: The History of Papiamentu and its African Ties. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jourdan, C.
1989Nativization and anglicization in Solomon Islands Pijin. World Englishes 8(1): 25–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991Pidgins and creoles: The blurring of categories. Annual Review of Anthropology 20: 187–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kießling, R. & Mous, M.
2004Urban youth languages in Africa. Anthropological Linguistics 46(3): 303–341.Google Scholar
Krämer, P.
2013: Vom Instinkt zum Bioprogramm, von der Mischung zum Hybrid. Historische und gegenwärtige Vorstellungen von Kreolisierung als Wandelprozess in der Sprache. In Kreolisierung revisited. Debatten um ein weltweites Kulturkonzept, G. Müller & N. Ueckmann (eds), 43–63. Bielefeld: transcript. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Ausgewählte Arbeiten der Kreolistik des 19. Jahrhunderts / Selected Works from 19th Century Creolistics. Emilio Teza, Thomas Russell, Erik Pontoppidan, Adolpho Coelho [Kreolische Bibliothek 24]. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Kusters, W.
2003Linguistic Complexity. The Influence of Social Change on Verbal Inflection. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Kuteva, T. & Comrie, B.
2012The evolution of language and elaborateness of grammar: the case of relative clauses in creole languages. In Relative Clauses in Languages of the Americas: A Typological Overview [Typological Studies in Language 102], B. Comrie & Z. Estrada-Fernández (eds), 27–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, C.
1998Creole Genesis and the Acquisition of Grammar: The Case of Haitian Creole. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2011Creoles, their Substrates, and Language Typology [Typological Studies in Language 95]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Relabeling in Language Genesis. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
LePage, R. B. & Tabouret-Keller, A.
1985Acts of Identity: Creole-based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lupyan, G. & Dale, R. A.
2010Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE: 5(1): e8559. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Magens, J. M.
1770Grammatica over det Creolske Sprog, som bruges paa de trende Danske Eilande, St. Croix, St. Thomas og St. Jan i America. Copenhagen: Kongelige Wäysenhusets Bogtrykkerie.Google Scholar
Mather, P.-A.
2007Creole studies. In French Applied Linguistics [Language Learning & Language Teaching 16], D. Ayoun (ed.), 401–424. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, J. H.
1995Sisters under the skin. A case for genetic relationship between the Atlantic English-based creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 10(2): 289–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999The Afrogenesis hypothesis of plantation creole origin. In Spreading the Word: The Issue of Diffusion among the Atlantic Creoles, M. Huber & M. Parkvall (eds), 111–152. London: University of Westminster.Google Scholar
2001The world’s simplest grammars are creole Grammars. Linguistic Typology 5(2–3): 125–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Defining Creole. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2012Case closed? Testing the feature pool hypothesis. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 27(1): 171–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meijer, G. & Muysken, P.
1977On the beginnings of pidgin and creole studies: Schuchardt and Hesseling. In Pidgin and Creole Linguistics, A. Valdman (ed.), 21–45. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Michaelis, S.
(ed.) 2008Roots of Creole Structures. Weighing the Contribution of Substrates and Superstrates [Creole Language Library 33]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, M., Sinnemäki, K. & Karlsson, F.
(eds) 2009Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 94]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. S.
1996The Founder Principle in creole genesis. Diachronica 13(1): 83–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Creolization is a social, not a structural, process. In Degrees of Restructuring in Creole Languages [Creole Language Library 22], I. Neumann-Holzschuh & E. W. Schneider (eds), 65–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2001The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Competition and selection in language evolution. Selection 3(1): 45–56 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Language Evolution: Contact, Competition and Change. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2010Second language acquisition and the emergence of creoles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32: 1–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, P.
1979Growth and Structure of the Lexicon of New Guinea Pidgin. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
1997Pidgin and Creole Linguistics. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Muysken, P. C.
1988Are creoles a special type of language? In Linguistic Theory: Extensions and Implications [Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, Vol. 2], F. Newmeyer (ed.), 285–301. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muysken, P. C. & Smith, N. S. H.
1986Substrata versus Universals in Creole Genesis [Creole Language Library 1]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muysken, P. C., Smith, N. S. H. & Borges, R. D.
(eds) 2015Surviving the Middle Passage. The West Africa-Surinam Sprachbund. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Parkvall, M.
2000Out of Africa. African Influences in Atlantic Creoles. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
2008The simplicity of creoles in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Miestamo, Sinnemäki & Karlsson (eds), 265–285.Google Scholar
Parkvall, M. & Bakker, P.
2013Pidgins. In Contact Languages, P. Bakker & Y. Matras (eds), 15–64. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plag, I.
2002On the role of grammaticalization in creolization. In Pidgin and Creole Linguistics in the Twenty-first Century, G. G. Gilbert (ed.), 229–246. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2011Creolization and admixture: Typology, feature pools, and second language acquisition. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26(1): 89–110. Special issue Creoles and Typology, P. Bhatt & T. Veenstra (eds). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, S. J.
2005The Emergence of Hawai’i Creole English in the Early 20th Century: The Sociohistorical Context of Creole Genesis. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. J. & Bresnan, J.
2008Retained inflectional morphology in pidgins: A typological study. Linguistic Typology 12: 269–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S.
1988Pidgin and Creole Languages. London: Longman.Google Scholar
van Rossem, C. & van der Voort, H.
1996Die Creol Taal. 250 Years of Negerhollands Texts. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, G, Gil, D. & Trudgill, P.
(eds) 2009Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. & Laberge, S.
1974On the acquisition of native speakers by a language. In Pidgins and Creoles: Current Trends and Prospects, D. DeCamp & I. F. Hancock (eds), 73–84. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Shnukal, A. & Marchese, L.
1983Creolization of Nigerian Pidgin English: A progress report. English World-Wide 4: 17–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shosted, R.
2006Correlating complexity: A typological approach. Linguistic Typology 10: 1–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, I.
2012Measuring substrate influence. Word order features in Ibero-Asian Creoles. In Ibero-Asian Creoles: Comparative Perspectives [Creole Language Library 46], H. C. Cardoso, A. N. Baxter & M. Pinharanda Nunes (eds), 125–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. S. H.
1987The Genesis of the Creole Languages of Surinam. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Speedy, K.
2013Reflections on creole genesis in New Caledonia. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 45(2): 187–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, D. R.
1971Grammatical and lexical affinities of creoles. In Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, D. Hymes (ed.), 293–296. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G.
2001Language Contact: An Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, S. & Kaufman, T.
1988Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P.
2009Sociolinguistic typology and complexification. In Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable, 97–108, G. Sampson, D. Gil & P. Trudgill (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2011Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Velupillai, V.
2012An Introduction to Linguistic Typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Volker, C.
1982An Introduction to Rabaul Creole German (Unserdeutsch). MA thesis, University of Queensland.Google Scholar
Whinnom, K.
1965The origin of the European-based creoles and pidgins. Orbis 14: 509–527Google Scholar