Chapter published in:
Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches
Edited by Peter Bakker, Finn Borchsenius, Carsten Levisen and Eeva Sippola
[Not in series 211] 2017
► pp. 103–140

Creole typology II

Typological features of creoles: from early proposals to phylogenetic approaches and comparisons with non-creoles

| Aarhus University
| Aarhus University
In the late 1950s, creolists started drawing lists of shared lexical and grammatical properties of creole languages. In this chapter, a number of proposals and features are presented. We show that few of the proposed common properties are in fact shared by all creoles. We also discuss typological studies in which samples of creoles are compared with samples of non-creoles. Creoles, despite their diversity, tend to cluster in a different pattern from non-creoles, even when non-European creoles are added, providing robust evidence for a creole typological profile. Finally, the chapter deals with the neglected area of diachronic aspects of creoles. No systematic surveys comparing language change in creoles and non-creoles have yet been conducted. The pre-existence of a pidgin phase is a plausible explanation for some of the major differences observed between creoles and non-creoles.
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 31 May 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.211.06dav
References

References

Aboh, E. & Ansaldo, U.
2007 The role of typology in language creation: A descriptive take. In Deconstructing Creole [Typological Studies in Language 73], U. Ansaldo, S. Matthews, & L. Lim (eds), 39–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P.
2001 No creolisation without prior pidginization? Te Reo 44(1): 31–50.Google Scholar
Bakker, P.
1987 Autonomous Languages. Signed and Spoken Languages Created by Children in the Light of Bickerton’s Bioprogram Hypothesis [Publikaties van het Instituut voor Algemene Taalwetenschap 53]. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
2014a Creoles and typology: Problems of sampling and definition. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 29(2): 437–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014b Creolistics: back to square one? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 29(1): 177–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, P., Daval-Markussen, A., Parkvall, M. & Plag, I.
2011 Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26(1): 5–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Becker, A. & Veenstra, T.
2003 The survival of inflectional morphology in French-related creoles. Second Language Acquisition 25: 283–306.Google Scholar
Bender, L.
1987 Some possible African creoles: A pilot study. In Pidgin and Creole Languages. Essays in Memory of John E. Reinecke, G. G. Gilbert (ed.), 37–60. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D.
1981 Roots of Language. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
1984 The Language Bioprogram Hypothesis. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7(1): 173–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruyn, A.
1995 Grammaticalization in Creoles: The Development of Determiners and Relative Clauses in Sranan. Amsterdam: IFOTT.Google Scholar
Chaudenson, R.
1992 Des îles, des hommes, des langues: Essais sur la créolisation linguistique et culturelle. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Cysouw, M.
2009 APiCS, WALS, and the creole typological profile (if any). Paper presented at the 1st APiCS conference, Leipzig, 5–8 November.Google Scholar
Daval-Markussen, A.
2013 First steps towards a typological profile of creoles. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 45(2): 274–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, M.
2003 Against creole exceptionalism. Language 79: 391–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, M. S.
1992 The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68: 81–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a Indefinite articles. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/38 (1 November 2014).
2013b Negative morphemes. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/112> (5 July 2015)
Givón, T.
1981 On the development of the numeral ‘one’ as an indefinite marker. Folia Linguistica Historica 2: 35–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1984 Syntax. A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. P.
2009 Admixture, structural transmission, simplicity, and creolisation. In Simplicity and Complexity in Creoles and Pidgins, N. Faraclas & T. B. Klein (eds), 125–152. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Grant, A. & Guillemin, D.
2012 The complex of creole typological features. The case of Mauritian Creole. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 27(1): 48–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R. A., Jr.
1958 Creole languages and genetic relationships. Word 14(1): 367–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1959 Neo-Melanesian and glottochronology. International Journal of American Linguistics 25: 265–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1966 Pidgin and Creole Languages. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hancock, I. F.
1975 Malacca Creole Portuguese: Asian, African Or European? Anthropological Linguistics 17(5): 211–236.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D. & Comrie B.
(eds) 2005 The World Atlas of Linguistic Structures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, B.
1997 Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, B. & Kuteva, T.
2002 World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holm, J.
1988 Pidgins and Creoles, Vol. I: Theory and Structure. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Holm, J. & Patrick, P. L.
2007 Comparative Creole Syntax. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Janson. T.
1984 Articles and plural formation in creoles: Change and universals. Lingua 64: 291–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jansson, F., Parkvall, M., & Strimling, P.
2015 Modeling the evolution of creoles. Language Dynamics and Change 5(1): 1–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klein, W. & Perdue, C.
1997 The basic variety. Or: Couldn’t natural language be much simpler? Second Language Research 13: 301–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, B., Schneider, E., Burridge, K., Mesthrie, R. & Upton, C.
(eds) 2004 A Handbook of Varieties of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kouwenberg, S.
1994 A Grammar of Berbice Dutch Creole. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Berbice Dutch (Creole Dutch). In Comparative Creole Syntax, J. Holm & P. L. Patrick (eds), 25–52. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Markey, T. L.
1982 Afrikaans: Creole or non-creole? Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 49 (1): 169–207.Google Scholar
McWhorter, J. H.
1998 Identifying the creole prototype. Vindicating a typological class. Language 74(4): 788–818. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology 5 (1): 125–166.Google Scholar
2005 Defining Creole. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2011 Tying up loose ends. The creole prototype after all. Diachronica 28(1): 82–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, S. M., Maurer, P., Haspelmath, M. & Huber, M.
(eds) 2013 The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Structures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. S.
1996 The founder principle in creole genesis. Diachronica 13(1): 83–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015a Pidgins and creole Languages. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn, Vol. 18, J. D. Wright, (ed.), 133–145. Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015b L’émergence des parlers créoles et l’évolution des langues romanes: Faits, mythes et ideologies. Études Créoles 2: 11–39.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, P.
1997 Pidgin and Creole Linguistics, expanded and revised edn. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Muysken, P.
2015 Conclusion: Feature distribution in the West Africa-Surinam Trans-Atlantic Sprachbund. In Surviving the Middle Passage. The West Africa-Surinam Sprachbund, P. C. Muysken, N. Smith & R. D. Borges (eds), 393–408. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Muysken, P. & Law, P.
2001 Creole studies: A theoretical linguist’s field guide. Glot International 5(2): 47–57.Google Scholar
Muysken, P. C., Smith, N. & Borges, R. D.
(eds) 2015 Surviving the Middle Passage. The West Africa-Surinam Sprachbund. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Parkvall, M.
2000 Out of Africa: African Influences in Atlantic Creoles. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
2008 The simplicity of creoles in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Language Complexity. Typology, Contact, Change, M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki & F. Karlsson (eds), 265–285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parkvall, M., Jansson, F. & Strimling, P.
2014 Simulating the genesis of Mauritian. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics 45(2): 265–273. Crossref.Google Scholar
Pentland, D. H.
1979 Causes of rapid phonological change: The case of Atsina and its relatives. Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 99–137.Google Scholar
Robertson, I.
2006 Challenging the definition of creole. In Exploring the Boundaries of Caribbean Creole Languages, H. Simmons-McDonald & I. Robertson (eds), 3–20. Mona, Jamaica: University of the West Indies Press.Google Scholar
Romaine, S.
1988 Pidgin and Creole languages. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ross, M. D.
1996 Contact-induced change and the comparative method: Cases from Papua New Guinea. In The Comparative Method Reviewed: Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change, M. Durie & M. D. Ross (eds), 180–217. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Saitou, N. & Nei, M.
1987 The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4(4): 406–425.Google Scholar
Smith, N.
2008 Creole phonology. In The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies, S. Kouwenberg & J. V. Singler (eds), 98–129. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stassen, L.
2013 Predicative possession. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/117 (11 June 2015)
Stolz, T.
1987 Kreolistik und Germanistik: Niederländisch-basierte Sprachformen in Übersee. Linguistische Berichte 110(1): 283–318.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B. & Kortmann, B.
2009 The morphosyntax of varieties of English worldwide: A quantitative perspective. Lingua 119(1): 1643–1663. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, D.
1956 Language contacts in the West Indies. Word 12(1): 399–414. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1971 Grammatical and lexical affinities of creoles. In Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, D. Hymes (ed.), 293–296. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. R.
1977 Languages of the West Indies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Veenstra, T.
2008 Creole genesis: The impact of the Language Bioprogram. In The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies, S. Kouwenberg & J. V. Singler (eds), 219–241. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kouwenberg, Silvia & John Victor Singler
2020.  In Advances in Contact Linguistics [Contact Language Library, 57], ► pp. 108 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.