Chapter published in:
Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches
Edited by Peter Bakker, Finn Borchsenius, Carsten Levisen and Eeva Sippola
[Not in series 211] 2017
► pp. 103140
References

References

Aboh, E. & Ansaldo, U.
2007The role of typology in language creation: A descriptive take. In Deconstructing Creole [Typological Studies in Language 73], U. Ansaldo, S. Matthews, & L. Lim (eds), 39–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P.
2001No creolisation without prior pidginization? Te Reo 44(1): 31–50.Google Scholar
Bakker, P.
1987Autonomous Languages. Signed and Spoken Languages Created by Children in the Light of Bickerton’s Bioprogram Hypothesis [Publikaties van het Instituut voor Algemene Taalwetenschap 53]. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
2014aCreoles and typology: Problems of sampling and definition. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 29(2): 437–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014bCreolistics: back to square one? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 29(1): 177–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, P., Daval-Markussen, A., Parkvall, M. & Plag, I.
2011Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26(1): 5–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Becker, A. & Veenstra, T.
2003The survival of inflectional morphology in French-related creoles. Second Language Acquisition 25: 283–306.Google Scholar
Bender, L.
1987Some possible African creoles: A pilot study. In Pidgin and Creole Languages. Essays in Memory of John E. Reinecke, G. G. Gilbert (ed.), 37–60. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D.
1981Roots of Language. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
1984The Language Bioprogram Hypothesis. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7(1): 173–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruyn, A.
1995Grammaticalization in Creoles: The Development of Determiners and Relative Clauses in Sranan. Amsterdam: IFOTT.Google Scholar
Chaudenson, R.
1992Des îles, des hommes, des langues: Essais sur la créolisation linguistique et culturelle. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Cysouw, M.
2009APiCS, WALS, and the creole typological profile (if any). Paper presented at the 1st APiCS conference, Leipzig, 5–8 November.Google Scholar
Daval-Markussen, A.
2013First steps towards a typological profile of creoles. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 45(2): 274–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, M.
2003Against creole exceptionalism. Language 79: 391–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, M. S.
1992The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68: 81–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013aIndefinite articles. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/38 (1 November 2014).
2013bNegative morphemes. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/112> (5 July 2015)
Givón, T.
1981On the development of the numeral ‘one’ as an indefinite marker. Folia Linguistica Historica 2: 35–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1984Syntax. A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. P.
2009Admixture, structural transmission, simplicity, and creolisation. In Simplicity and Complexity in Creoles and Pidgins, N. Faraclas & T. B. Klein (eds), 125–152. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Grant, A. & Guillemin, D.
2012The complex of creole typological features. The case of Mauritian Creole. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 27(1): 48–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R. A., Jr.
1958Creole languages and genetic relationships. Word 14(1): 367–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1959Neo-Melanesian and glottochronology. International Journal of American Linguistics 25: 265–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1966Pidgin and Creole Languages. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hancock, I. F.
1975Malacca Creole Portuguese: Asian, African Or European? Anthropological Linguistics 17(5): 211–236.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D. & Comrie B.
(eds) 2005The World Atlas of Linguistic Structures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, B.
1997Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, B. & Kuteva, T.
2002World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holm, J.
1988Pidgins and Creoles, Vol. I: Theory and Structure. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Holm, J. & Patrick, P. L.
2007Comparative Creole Syntax. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Janson. T.
1984Articles and plural formation in creoles: Change and universals. Lingua 64: 291–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jansson, F., Parkvall, M., & Strimling, P.
2015Modeling the evolution of creoles. Language Dynamics and Change 5(1): 1–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klein, W. & Perdue, C.
1997The basic variety. Or: Couldn’t natural language be much simpler? Second Language Research 13: 301–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, B., Schneider, E., Burridge, K., Mesthrie, R. & Upton, C.
(eds) 2004A Handbook of Varieties of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kouwenberg, S.
1994A Grammar of Berbice Dutch Creole. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Berbice Dutch (Creole Dutch). In Comparative Creole Syntax, J. Holm & P. L. Patrick (eds), 25–52. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Markey, T. L.
1982Afrikaans: Creole or non-creole? Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 49 (1): 169–207.Google Scholar
McWhorter, J. H.
1998Identifying the creole prototype. Vindicating a typological class. Language 74(4): 788–818. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology 5 (1): 125–166.Google Scholar
2005Defining Creole. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2011Tying up loose ends. The creole prototype after all. Diachronica 28(1): 82–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, S. M., Maurer, P., Haspelmath, M. & Huber, M.
(eds) 2013The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Structures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. S.
1996The founder principle in creole genesis. Diachronica 13(1): 83–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015aPidgins and creole Languages. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn, Vol. 18, J. D. Wright, (ed.), 133–145. Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015bL’émergence des parlers créoles et l’évolution des langues romanes: Faits, mythes et ideologies. Études Créoles 2: 11–39.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, P.
1997Pidgin and Creole Linguistics, expanded and revised edn. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Muysken, P.
2015Conclusion: Feature distribution in the West Africa-Surinam Trans-Atlantic Sprachbund. In Surviving the Middle Passage. The West Africa-Surinam Sprachbund, P. C. Muysken, N. Smith & R. D. Borges (eds), 393–408. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Muysken, P. & Law, P.
2001Creole studies: A theoretical linguist’s field guide. Glot International 5(2): 47–57.Google Scholar
Muysken, P. C., Smith, N. & Borges, R. D.
(eds) 2015Surviving the Middle Passage. The West Africa-Surinam Sprachbund. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Parkvall, M.
2000Out of Africa: African Influences in Atlantic Creoles. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
2008The simplicity of creoles in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Language Complexity. Typology, Contact, Change, M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki & F. Karlsson (eds), 265–285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parkvall, M., Jansson, F. & Strimling, P.
2014Simulating the genesis of Mauritian. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics 45(2): 265–273. Crossref.Google Scholar
Pentland, D. H.
1979Causes of rapid phonological change: The case of Atsina and its relatives. Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 99–137.Google Scholar
Robertson, I.
2006Challenging the definition of creole. In Exploring the Boundaries of Caribbean Creole Languages, H. Simmons-McDonald & I. Robertson (eds), 3–20. Mona, Jamaica: University of the West Indies Press.Google Scholar
Romaine, S.
1988Pidgin and Creole languages. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ross, M. D.
1996Contact-induced change and the comparative method: Cases from Papua New Guinea. In The Comparative Method Reviewed: Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change, M. Durie & M. D. Ross (eds), 180–217. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Saitou, N. & Nei, M.
1987The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4(4): 406–425.Google Scholar
Smith, N.
2008Creole phonology. In The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies, S. Kouwenberg & J. V. Singler (eds), 98–129. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stassen, L.
2013Predicative possession. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/117 (11 June 2015)
Stolz, T.
1987Kreolistik und Germanistik: Niederländisch-basierte Sprachformen in Übersee. Linguistische Berichte 110(1): 283–318.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B. & Kortmann, B.
2009The morphosyntax of varieties of English worldwide: A quantitative perspective. Lingua 119(1): 1643–1663. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, D.
1956Language contacts in the West Indies. Word 12(1): 399–414. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1971Grammatical and lexical affinities of creoles. In Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, D. Hymes (ed.), 293–296. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. R.
1977Languages of the West Indies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Veenstra, T.
2008Creole genesis: The impact of the Language Bioprogram. In The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies, S. Kouwenberg & J. V. Singler (eds), 219–241. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kouwenberg, Silvia & John Victor Singler
2020.  In Advances in Contact Linguistics [Contact Language Library, 57],  pp. 108 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.