Cover not available
Part of
Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches
Edited by Peter Bakker, Finn Borchsenius, Carsten Levisen and Eeva M. Sippola
[Not in series 211] 2017
► pp. 269–292

Chapter 12
Afro-Hispanic varieties in comparison

New light from phylogeny

| University of Zürich and University of Bremen
| University of Texas at Austin and Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies
| University of Bremen
This study examines the potential of phylogenetic analysis in the classification and comparison of Spanish contact varieties, with special focus on three Afro-Hispanic varieties spoken in South America. Our analysis is based on typological and dialectal comparative data. The results of the phylogenetic analysis show clear clusters of standard varieties and creole varieties, while the placement of other contact varieties in the network has to be interpreted in the light of the data collection methods and socio-historical information about the varieties.
Keywords: Afro-Hispanic, classifications, Spanish-based creoles, Spanish varieties
Article outline
  • 12.1Introduction
  • 12.2The Afro-Hispanic varieties
  • 12.3Sample and methodology
  • 12.4Results of the phylogenetic network analysis
  • 12.5Discussion of classifications and characteristic traits
  • 12.6Reflections on the method
  • 12.7Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 31 May 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.211.12per
References (60)
References
Bakker, P., Daval-Markussen, A., Parkvall, M. & Plag, I. 2013. Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. In Creole Languages and Linguistic Typology [Benjamins Current Topics 57], P. Bhatt & T. Veenstra (eds), 9–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. 1981. Roots of Language. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Bryant, D. & Moulton, V. 2004. Neighbor-net: An agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 21(2): 255–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. 2008. Evolutionary Linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology 37: 219–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuba, M. 2002. El castellano hablado en Chincha. Lima: Talleres Gráficos de Angélica Tapia M.Google Scholar
Daval-Markussen, A. & Bakker, P. 2011. A phylogenetic networks approach to the classification of English-based Atlantic Creoles. English World-Wide 32(2): 115–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. Explorations in creole research with phylogenetic tools. Proceedings of the EACL 2012 Joint Workshop of LINGVIS & UNCLH, 89–97. Avignon, France, April 2012. Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
DeGraff, M. 2005. Linguists’ most dangerous myth: The fallacy of Creolist Exceptionalism. Language in Society 34, 533–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. Phylogenetic magic in creolistics: Language acquisition, feature values, and family values. Paper presented at the Formal Approaches to Creole Studies III Workshop, Lisbon, November 15–16.Google Scholar
DeGraff, M., Bass, T. & Berwick, R. 2013. Computational phylogenetics, creole languages and family values. Paper presented at the International Congress of Linguists, Geneva, July 21–27. <[URL]> (September 12 2016).
Dryer, M. S. & Haspelmath, M. (eds). 2013. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (3 March 2015).
Haspelmath, M. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3): 663–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B. & Kuteva, T. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holm, J. 1988–1989. Pidgins and Creoles [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1992. Popular Brazilian Portuguese: A semi-creole. In Actas do Colóquio sobre “Crioulos de base lexical Portuguesa, E. d’Andrade & A. Kihm (eds), 37–66. Lisbon: Colibri.Google Scholar
2004. Languages in Contact: The Partial Restructuring of Vernaculars. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Huson, D. H. & Bryant, D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23(2): 254–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, B. 2013. How powerful is geography as an explanatory factor of variation? Areal features in the Anglophone world. In Space in Language and Linguistics: Geographical, Interactional, and Cognitive Perspectives, P. Auer, M. Hilpert, A. Stukenbrock & B. Szmrecsanyi (eds), 165–194. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipski. J. 1985a. Contactos hispanoafricanos: El español guineano y su importancia para la dialectología hispanoamericana. Anuario de Letras 23: 99–130.Google Scholar
Lipski, J. 1985b. The Spanish of Equatorial Guinea. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987a. Breves notas sobre el español filipino. Anuario de letras 25: 209–219.Google Scholar
1987b. The Chota Valley: Afro-Hispanic language in highland Ecuador. Latin American Research Review 22: 155–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988. Sabine River Spanish: Vestigial eighteenth century Mexican Spanish in Texas and Louisiana. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 8: 5–24.Google Scholar
1994a. Latin American Spanish. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1994b. El lenguaje afroperuano: Eslabón entre Africa y América. Anuario de Lingüística Hispánica 10: 179–216.Google Scholar
2004. Spanish of Equatorial Guinea. Arizona Journal of Hispanic Studies 8: 115–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. A History of Afro-Hispanic Language. Five Centuries,Five Continents. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007a. Afro-Bolivian Spanish: The survival of a true creole prototype. In Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives on Contact Languages [Creole Language Library 32], M. Huber & V. Velupillai (eds), 175–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007b. Afro-Yungueño speech. The long-lost “black Spanish”. Language in Context 4(1): 1–43.Google Scholar
2008. Afro-Bolivian Spanish. Frankfurt & Madrid: Vervuert & Iberoamericana. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Afro-Choteño speech: Towards the (re)creation of “Black Spanish”. Negritud 2: 99–120.Google Scholar
Lloyd, P. M. 1987. Del latín al español. Fonología y morfología históricas de la lengua española. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
McWhorter, J. 1998. Identifying the creole prototype: Vindicating a typological class. Language 74, 788–818. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, S. M., Maurer, P., Haspelmath, M. & Huber, M. (eds). 2013. Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (4 March 2015).
Mufwene, S. 1997. Jargons, pidgins, creoles and koines: What are they? In The Structure and Status of Pidgins and Creoles [Creole Language Library 19], A. Spears & D. Winford (eds), 35–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, P. 1997. Pidgin and Creole Linguistics, expanded and revised edn. London: University of Westminster Press.Google Scholar
Penny, R. 2004. Variación y cambio en español. Madrid: Editorial Gredos.Google Scholar
Perez, D. M. 2015. Traces of Portuguese in Afro-Yungueño Spanish? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 30(2): 307–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poplack, S. & Levey, S. 2010. Contact-induced grammatical change. In Language and Space – An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation, Vol. 1: Theories and Methods, P. Auer & J. E. Schmidt (eds), 391–419. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Prieto, P., Borràs-Comes, J., & Roseano, P. (eds). 2010–2014. Interactive Atlas of Romance Intonation. <[URL]> (20 August 2014).
Quilis, A. & Casado-Fresnillo, C. 2008. La lengua española en Filipinas. Historia. Situación actual. El chabacano. Antología de textos [Anejos de la Revista de Filología Española 101]. Madrid: CSIC.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. 1988. Pidgin and Creole Languages. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Romero, F. 1987. El negro en el Perú y su transculturación lingüística. Lima: Editorial Milla Batres.Google Scholar
1988. Quimba, fa, malambó, ñeque: Afronegrismos en el Perú. Lima: IEP.Google Scholar
1994. Safari africano y compraventa de esclavos para el Perú (1412–1818). Lima: IEP.Google Scholar
Schwegler, A. 1999. Monogenesis revisited: The Spanish perspective. In Creole Genesis, Attitudes and Discourse [Creole Language Library 20], J. Rickford & S. Romaine (eds), 235–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Portuguese remnants in the Afro-Hispanic diaspora. In Portuguese-Spanish Interfaces: Diachrony, Synchrony, and Contact [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 1], A. M. Carvalho & P. Amaral (eds), 403–441. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sessarego, S. 2011. Introducción al idioma afroboliviano: Una conversación con el awicho Manuel Barra. Cochabamba: Plural Editores.Google Scholar
2013a. Chota Valley Spanish. Madrid & Frankfurt: Iberoamericana & Vervuert. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b. On the non-creole bases for Afro-Bolivian Spanish. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 28(2): 363–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013c. Afro-Hispanic contact varieties as conventionalized advanced second languages. Iberia 5(1): 96–122.Google Scholar
2014a. Afro-Peruvian Spanish in the context of Spanish creole genesis. Spanish in Context 11(3): 381–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b. On the origins of Chota Valley Spanish: Linguistic and sociohistorical evidence. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 29(1): 86–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014c. The Afro-Bolivian Spanish Determiner Phrase: A Microparametric Account. Columbus OH: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
2015. Afro-Peruvian Spanish: Spanish Slavery and the Legacy of Spanish Creoles [Creole Language Library 51]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. A Response to Perez. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 31(1): 200–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seuren, P. & Wekker, H. 1986. Semantic transparency as a factor in Creole genesis. In Substrata versus Universals in Creole Genesis [Creole Language Library 1], P. Muysken & N. Smith (eds), 57–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singler, J. V. 2008. The sociohistorical context of creole genesis. In The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies, S. Kouwenberg & J. V. Singler (eds), 332–358. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G. & Kaufman, T. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley CA: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wichmann S., Holman, E. W., Rama T. & Walker, R. S. 2011. Correlates of reticulation in linguistic phylogenies. Language Dynamics and Change 1: 205–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Bakker, Peter
2023. Empiricism against imperialism. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages DOI logo
Hickey, Raymond
2021. Dialect Contact and the Emergence of New Varieties of English. In English and Spanish, ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Danae Perez, Marianne Hundt, Johannes Kabatek & Daniel Schreier
2021. English and Spanish, DOI logo
Perez, Danae M.
2021. Contact Scenarios and Varieties of Spanish beyond Europe. In English and Spanish, ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Sessarego, Sandro
2021. A socio-historical perspective on the origin and evolution of two Afro-Andean vernaculars. In Spanish Socio-Historical Linguistics [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 12], ► pp. 164 ff. DOI logo
Sippola, Eeva
2020. Contact and Spanish in the Pacific. In The Handbook of Language Contact, ► pp. 453 ff. DOI logo
Sippola, Eeva
2021. Morphosyntactic Variation in Spanish. In English and Spanish, ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.