Chapter published in:
Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches
Edited by Peter Bakker, Finn Borchsenius, Carsten Levisen and Eeva Sippola
[Not in series 211] 2017
► pp. 293–313

Cognitive creolistics and semantic primes

A phylogenetic network analysis

| Roskilde University, Aarhus University
| Aarhus University
This study presents a semantics-driven lexical comparison of 20 creole languages and five European lexifier languages. Breaking new ground into understanding creole semantics, it utilizes insights from both cognitive semantics (in particular, the Natural Semantic Metalanguage approach) and phylogenetic approaches to linguistics comparisons. We provide an extensive study of label-meaning correlations as a way of exploring the relationship between word labels and word meanings across creoles and lexifiers. We conclude that creoles are not simply “versions” of their lexifier languages, and that it is misleading to say that creoles are “based” on European languages in their basic lexical-semantic configuration. At the same time, we find that creoles do relate more closely to their historical lexifiers than to other creoles, and that the lexical-semantic perspective adds a new dimension to the typology of creoles, nuancing the pictures from grammar-based comparisons.
Keywords: lexical semantics, cognitive creolistics, semantic primes, cross-creole comparison, creole-lexifier comparison
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 31 May 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.211.13lev
References

References

Aboh, E. O., Veenstra, T. & Smith, N. S. H.
2013 Saramaccan structure dataset. In Michaelis et al. (eds).Google Scholar
Alleyne, M.
2014 A reformist approach to the creole concept. Keynote speech at the Aruba SCL/SPCL/ACBLPE conference 2014, Aruba.Google Scholar
Baker, P. & Kriegel, S.
2013 Mauritian Creole structure dataset. In Michaelis et al. (eds).Google Scholar
Bakker, P., Daval-Markussen, A., Parkvall, M. & Plag, I.
2011 Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26(1): 5–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baptista, M.
2013 Cape Verdean Creole of Brava structure dataset. In Michaelis et al. (eds).Google Scholar
Bartens, A.
2013 Nicaraguan Creole English structure dataset. In Michaelis et al. (eds).Google Scholar
Bartens, A. & Sandström, N.
2006 Semantic primes in Atlantic Iberomance-based creoles: Superstrate continuity or innovation? Estudios de Sociolinguística 7 (1): 31–54.Google Scholar
Bible Society of The West Indies
2012 Di Jamiekan nyuu testiment. Kingston: Bible Society of The West Indies.Google Scholar
Bowern, C.
2008 Linguistic Fieldwork: A Practical Guide. New York NY: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, D. & Moulton, V.
2004 Neighbor-Net: An agglomerative algorithm for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21(2): 255–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bromhead, H.
2009 The Reign of Truth and Faith: Epistemic Expressions in 16th and 17th Century English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Ethnogeographical categories in English and Pitjantjatjara/Yankunjtjatjara. Language Sciences 33(1): 58–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, L.
2014 Biesik Jumiekan: Introduction to Jamaican Language. Washington DC: Gnosophia.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. & Smith, N.
1977 Lingua descriptive series questionnaire. Lingua 42: 1–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, T.
1990 Beach-la-Mar to Bislama: The Emergence of a National Language in Vanuatu. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
DeGraff, M.
2001 The origins of creoles: A Cartesian critique of Neo-Darwinian Linguistics. Linguistic Typology 5: 213–310.Google Scholar
2005 Linguists’ most dangerous myth. The fallacy of creole exceptionalism. Language in Society 34: 533–591. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
den Besten, H. & Biberauer, T.
2013 Afrikaans structure dataset. In Michaelis et al. (eds).Google Scholar
de Jong, J. P. B. de Josselin
1926 Het huidige Negerhollandsch (Texten en woordenlijst). Amsterdam: Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Ehrhart, S. & Revis, M.
2013 Tayo structure dataset. In Michaelis et al. (eds).Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J.
2015 The Utility of Meaning: What Words Mean and Why. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Faraclas. N.
1996 Nigerian Pidgin. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faraclas, N.
2013 Nigerian Pidgin structure dataset. In Michaelis et al. (eds).Google Scholar
Fattier, D.
2013 Haitian Creole structure dataset. In Michaelis et al. (eds).Google Scholar
Farquharson, J. T.
2013 Jamaican structure dataset. In Michaelis et al. (eds).Google Scholar
Goddard, C.
(ed.) 2008 Cross-Linguistic Semantics [Studies in Language Companion Series 102]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, C. & Wierzbicka, A.
(eds) 1994 Semantics and Lexical Universals: Theory and Empirical Findings [Studies in Language Companion Series 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(eds) 2002 Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and Empirical Findings, Vols. 1–2 [Studies in Language Companion Series 60–61]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2014a: Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics across Domains, Languages, and Cultures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2014b Semantic fieldwork and lexical universals. Studies in Language 38(1): 80–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goilo, E. R.
1972 Papiamentu Textbook. Aruba: De Wit Stores.Google Scholar
Grant, A. & Guillemin, D.
2012 The complex of creole typological features: The case of Mauritian Creole. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 27(1): 49–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hagemeijer, T.
2013 Santome structure dataset. In Michaelis et al. (eds).Google Scholar
Hancock, I. F.
1985 Diversity and development in English-related Creoles. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Holm, J.
2001 The semicreole identity of Afrikaans lects: Parallel cases of partial restructuring. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 13(4): 353–379.Google Scholar
Holm, J. & Intumbo, I.
2009 Quantifying superstrate and substrate influence. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 24(2): 218–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hualde, J. I. & Schwegler, A.
2008 Intonation in Palenquero. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 22(2): 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kouwenberg, S. S.
1994 A Grammar of Berbice Dutch Creole. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a Berbice Dutch structure dataset. In Michaelis et al. (eds).Google Scholar
2013b Papiamentu structure dataset. In Michaelis et al. (eds).Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, S. S. & Murray, E.
1994 Papiamentu. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, C.
(ed.) 2011 Creoles, their Substrates, and Language Typology [Typological Studies in Language 95]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C., Meira, S.
& the Language and Cognition Group 2003 ‘Natural concepts’ in the spatial topological domain – adpositional meanings in cross-linguistic perspective: an exercise in semantic typology. Language 79(3): 485–516. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levisen, C.
2015 Scandinavian semantics and the human body: an ethnolinguistic study in diversity and change. Language Sciences 49: 51–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levisen, C. & Jogie, M.
2015 The Trinidadian “Theory of Mind”: Personhood and postcolonial semantics. International Journal of Language and Culture 2(2): 169–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levisen, C. & Priestley, C.
2017 Social keywords in postcolonial Melanesian discourse: kastom ‘traditional culture’ and tumbuna ‘ancestors’. In Cultural Keywords in Discourse, C. Levisen & S. Waters (eds), 83–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Levisen, C., Sippola, E. & Aragón, K.
2016 Color and visuality in Iberoromance creoles. In Color Language and Color Categorization. G. Paulsen, M. Uusküla & J. Brindle (eds), 270–301. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Majid, A., Enfield, N. J. & van Staden, M.
2006 Parts of the body: Cross-linguistic categorization. Language Sciences 28: 137–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Majid, A., Jordan F. & Dunn, M.
2015 Semantic systems in closely related languages. Language Sciences 49: 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matisoff, J.
2004 Areal semantics – is there such a thing? In Himalayan Languages: Past and Present, Anju Saxena (ed.), 347–394. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, J.
2001 The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology 5 (2–3): 125–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Linguistic Simplicity and Complexity: Why do Languages Undress. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, J. & Good, J.
2012 A Grammar of Saramaccan Creole. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, S.
(ed.) 2008 Roots of Creole Structures: Weighing the Contribution of Substrates and Superstrates [Creole Language Library 33]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, S. M., Maurer, P., Haspelmath, M. & Huber, M.
(eds) 2013 Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
Mühleisen, S.
2013 Trinidad English Creole structure dataset. In Michaelis et al. (eds).Google Scholar
Neumann, I.
1985 Le créole de Breaux Bridge, Louisiane: Etude morphosyntaxique – textes – vocabulaire. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Neumann-Holzschuh, I. & Klingler, T. A.
2013 Louisiana Creole structure dataset. In Michaelis et al. (eds).Google Scholar
Nicholls, S.
2013 Cultural scripts, social cognition and social interaction in Roper Kriol. Australian Journal of Linguistics 33: 282–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peeters, B.
(ed) 2006 Semantic Primes and Universal Grammar: Empirical evidence from the Romance languages [Studies in Language 81]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Priestley, C.
2008 The semantic of “inalienable possession” in Koromu (PNG). In Cross-Linguistic Semantics [Studies in Language Companion Series 102], C. Goddard (ed.), 277–300. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Koromu temporal expressions. In Space and Time in Languages and Cultures: Language, Culture and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing 36], L. Filipovic & K. Jaszczolt (eds), 143–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Social categories, shared experience, reciprocity and endangered meanings: Examples from Koromu (PNG). Australian Journal of Linguistics 33: 257–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, I. E.
1989 Berbice and Skepi Dutch: A lexical comparison. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 105: 3–21.Google Scholar
Sabino, R.
2012 Giving Jack his Jacket – Language Contact in the Danish West Indies. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwegler, A.
2013 Palenquero structure dataset. In Michaelis et al. (eds).Google Scholar
Stanwood, R. E.
1997 The primitive syntax of mental predicates in Hawai’i Creole English: A text-based study. Language Sciences 19(3): 209–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999 On the Adequacy of Hawai’i Creole English. PhD dissertation, University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar
Swadesh, M.
1971 The Origin and Diversification of Language, J. Sherzer (ed.). Chicago IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Travis, C.
2005 Discourse Markers in Columbian Spanish: A Study in Polysemy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van Rossem, C. & van der Voort, H.
1996 Die Creol Taal: 250 years of Negerhollands texts. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Velupillai, V.
2013 Hawai‘i Creole structure dataset. In Michaelis et al. (eds).Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
2006 English: Meaning and Culture. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Bodies and their parts: An NSM approach to semantic typology. Language Sciences 29(1): 14–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Imprisoned in English. The Hazards of English as the Default Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Winer, L.
1993 Trinidad and Tobago [Varieties of English around the World T6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 Dictionary of the English/Creole of Trinidad and Tobago. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Winford, D. & Plag, I.
2013 Sranan structure dataset. In Michaelis et al. (eds).Google Scholar
Wolf, H. G. & Polzenhagen, F.
2009 World Englishes: A Cognitive Sociolinguistic Approach. Berlin: De Gruyer Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar