Chapter published in:
Language Dispersal Beyond Farming
Edited by Martine Robbeets and Alexander Savelyev
[Not in series 215] 2017
► pp. 25–45

Proto-Quechua and Proto-Aymara agropastoral terms

Reconstruction and contact patterns

| Leiden University Centre for Linguistics
| Leiden University Centre for Linguistics
This chapter presents reconstructed Proto-Quechua and Proto-Aymara lexical items related to cultivation and herding, and draws conclusions about language and subsistence in the ancient Andes. The patterns of lexical borrowing between the two lineages offer a novel empirical perspective on how early Quechuan and Aymaran speakers lived. When the many layers of borrowing are stripped away, it is clear that both were engaged in agropastoral economies before the languages first came into contact. Furthermore, the presence of terms from a wide range of ecological zones, from the high grasslands to (in the case of Quechua) the tropical lowlands, suggests that both languages cross-cut elevations in a manner consistent with the typically Andean system of ecological complementarity.
Keywords: Quechua, Aymara, Andes, agropastoralism, language contact
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 21 December 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.215.02eml
References

References

Adelaar, Willem F. H.
1986 La relación Quechua-Aru: Perspectivas para la separación del léxico. Revista Andina 4(2): 379–426.Google Scholar
2008 The vicissitudes of directional affixes in Tarma (Northern Junin) Quechua. In What’s in a Verb? Studies in the Verbal Morphology of the Languages of the Americas, Grażyna J. Rowicka & Eithne B. Carlin (eds), 121–142. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
2012a Languages of the Middle Andes in areal-typological perspective: Emphasis on Quechuan and Aymaran. In The Indigenous Languages of South America: A Comprehensive Guide, Lyle Campbell & Verónica Grondona (eds), 575–624. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012b Modeling convergence: Towards a reconstruction of the history of Quechuan-Aymaran interaction. Lingua 122 (5): 461–469. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adelaar, Willem F. H. & Muysken, Pieter C.
2004 The Languages of the Andes. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anthony, David W. & Ringe, Don
2015 The Indo-European homeland from linguistic and archaeological perspectives. Annual Review of Linguistics 1(1): 199–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle
1995 The Quechumaran hypothesis and lessons for distant genetic comparison. Diachronica 12(2): 157–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo
1987 Lingüística Quechua. Cuzco: Centro de Estudios Rurales Andinos Bartolome de las Casas.Google Scholar
2000 Lingüística Aimara. Cuzco: Centro de Estudios Regionales Andinos Bartolomé de Las Casas.Google Scholar
2008a Quechumara: Estructuras paralelas del quechua y del aimara. La Paz: Plural Editores.Google Scholar
2008b Voces del Ande: Ensayos sobre onomástica andina, Vol. 3: Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar
Chang, Will et al.
2015 Ancestry-constrained phylogenetic analysis supports the Indo-European steppe hypothesis. Language 91(1): 194–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Jared & Bellwood, Peter
2003 Farmers and their languages: The first expansions. Science 300 (5619): 597–603. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emlen, Nicholas Q.
2016 Multilingualism in the Andes and Amazonia: A view from in-between. Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology. Crossref.Google Scholar
2017 Perspectives on the Quechua-Aymara contact relationship and the lexicon and phonology of Pre-Proto-Aymara. International Journal of American Linguistics 83(2): 307–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
To appear. On the polymorphemic genesis of some Proto-Quechua roots.
Gade, Daniel W.
1975 Plants, Man and the Land in the Vilcanota Valley of Peru. The Hague: W. Junk. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hardman, Martha J.
1966 Jaqaru: Outline of Phonological and Morphological Structure. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heggarty, Paul & Beresford-Jones, David
2010 Agriculture and language dispersals: Limitations, refinements, and an Andean exception? Current Anthropology 51(2): 163–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mallory, James P. & Adams, Douglas Q.
2006 The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European World. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Bruce
1991 The Language of the Inka since the European Invasion. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Murra, John V.
1972 El control vertical de un máximo de pisos ecológicos en la economía de las sociedades andinas. In Visita de la Provincia de León de Huánuco en 1562, Tomo II, John V. Murra (ed.), 429–462. Huánuco, Perú: Universidad Nacional Hermilio Valdizán.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter C.
2011 Modelling the Quechua-Aymara relationship: structural features, sociolinguistic scenarios, and possible archeological evidence. In Archaeology and Language in the Andes: A Cross-Disciplinary Exploration of Prehistory, Paul Heggarty & David Beresford-Jones (eds), 85–110. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis B.
1999 The case for sound symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 225–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Orr, Carolyn & Longacre, Robert E.
1968 Proto-Quechumaran. Language 44(3): 528–555. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pearsall, Deborah M.
2008 Plant domestication and the shift to agriculture in the Andes. In The Handbook of South American Archaeology. Helaine Silverman & William H. Isbell (eds), 105–120. New York NY: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perry, Linda et al.
2006 Early maize agriculture and interzonal interaction in southern Peru. Nature 440(2): 76–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pulgar Vidal, Javier
1987 Geografía del Perú. Las Ocho Regiones Naturales, 9th edn. Lima: PEISA.Google Scholar
Sandweiss, Daniel H. & Richardson, James B.
2008 Central Andean environments. In The Handbook of South American Archaeology, Helaine Silverman & William H. Isbell (eds), 93–104. New York NY: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Staller, John E.
2016 High altitude maize (Zea Mays L.) Cultivation and endemism in the Lake Titicaca Basin. Scientific Pages of Botany 1 (1): 8–21.Google Scholar
Torero, Alfredo
1964 Los dialectos quechuas. Anales Científicos de la Universidad Agraria 2(4): 446–478.Google Scholar
Tykot, Robert H. et al.
2006 The importance of maize in the Initial period and Early Horizon Peru. In Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Prehistory, Linguistics, Biogeography, Domestication, and Evolution of Maize. John Staller, Robert Tykot & Bruce Benz (eds), 187–197. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Urton, Gary
2012 The herder-cultivator relationship as a paradigm for archaeological origins, linguistic dispersals, and the evolution of record-keeping in the Andes. In Archaeology and Language in the Andes, Paul Heggarty & David Beresford-Jones (eds), 321–343. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Jane C.
1995 Evolution and present situation of the South American Camelidae. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 54 (3): 271–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerer, Karl S.
1995 The origins of Andean irrigation. Nature 378 (6556): 481–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Emlen, Nicholas Q. & Johannes Dellert
2020. On the polymorphemic genesis of some Proto-Quechuan roots. Diachronica 37:3 ► pp. 318 ff. Crossref logo
Michael, Lev
2021. The Classification of South American Languages. Annual Review of Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 329 ff. Crossref logo
Robbeets, Martine & Chuan-Chao Wang
2020. About millets and beans, words and genes. Evolutionary Human Sciences 2 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 07 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.