Part of
Introduction to Discourse Studies: New editionJan Renkema and Christoph Schubert
[Not in series 219] 2018
► pp. 421–448
Jan Renkema and Christoph Schubert
[Not in series 219] 2018
► pp. 421–448
References
Adler, M.
(2012) The plain language movement. In P. Tiersma & L. M. Solan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and law (pp. 67–83). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [14.4]
Agee, W., Ault, P., & Emery, E.
(1997) Introduction to mass communications (12th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. [14.6]
Ainsworth-Vaughn, N.
(1998) Claiming power in doctor-patient talk. New York: Oxford University Press. [14.7]
Ajzen, I.
(1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 179–211. [12.4]
Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L.
(2001) Through the models of writing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [13.5]
Allen, G.
(2011) Intertextuality (2nd ed.). Oxford: Routledge. [3.7]
Anchimbe, E. A., & Janney, R. W.
(2017) Postcolonial pragmatics. In A. Barron, Y. Gu & G. Steen (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of pragmatics (pp. 105–120). London: Routledge. [8.6.2, 15.6]
Arendholz, J.
(2013) (In)Appropriate online behavior: A pragmatic analysis of message board relations. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [2.6]
Arminen, I.
(2005) Institutional interaction: Studies of talk at work. Aldershot: Ashgate. [14.2]
Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P.
(1979) Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanity Press. [14.4]
Auer, P., & Luzio, A. di
Austin, J. L.
(1976) How to do things with words (2nd ed.). Ed. by J. O. Urmson & M. Sbisà. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [2.3.1]
Ausubel, D.
(1960) The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 267–272. [5.5]
Baesler, J., & Burgoon, J.
(1994) The temporal effects of story and statistical evidence on belief change. Communication Research, 21, 582–602. [12.5]
Bakhtin, M.
(1981) The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed., C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press. [4.3]
(1986) The problem of speech genres. In M. M. Bakthin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Eds., V. W. McGee, Trans.), Speech genres and other late essays (pp. 60–102). Austin: University of Texas Press. [4.3]
Bal, M.
(2017) Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative (4th ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. [7.5]
Balota, D. A., Flores d’Arcais, G. B., & Rayner, K.
(Eds.) (1990) Comprehension processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.2]
Bamberg, M.
(Ed.) (1997) Oral versions of personal experience: Three decades of narrative analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [11.3]
Barcelona, A.
(Ed.) (2003) Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [8.6]
Bargiela-Chiappini, F., & Harris, S.
Bar-Hillel, Y.
(1954) Indexical expressions. Mind, 63, 359–379. [7.3]
Barron, A.
(2012) Public information messages: A contrastive genre analysis of state-citizen communication. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [14.5]
Bartlett, F. C.
(1932) Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [13.2]
Bartlett, T., & O’Grady, G.
(Eds.) (2017) The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics. Oxford: Routledge. [3.6]
Bartsch, R.
(1987) Norms of language: Theoretical and practical issues. London: Longman. [3.3]
Bateman, J.
(2008) Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. [4.5]
(2014) Text and image: A critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide. London: Routledge. [4.5]
(2017) The place of systemic functional linguistics as a linguistic theory in the twenty-first century. In T. Bartlett & G. O’Grady (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics (pp. 11–26). Oxford: Routledge. [3.6]
Bateman, J., & Schmidt, K.-H.
(2012) Multimodal film analysis: How films mean. New York: Routledge. [4.5]
Baten, L.
(1981) Text comprehension. The parameters of difficulty in narrative and expository prose texts: A redefinition of readability. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana. [5.2]
Baus, M., & Sandig, B.
(1985) Gesprächspsychotherapie und weibliches Selbstkonzept: Sozialpsychologische und linguistische Analyse am Beispiel eines Falles [Conversational psychotherapy and female self-concept: Socio-psychological and linguistic analysis of a case example]. Hildesheim: Olms. [14.7]
Beaugrande, R. A. de, & Dressler, W. U.
(1981) Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman. [1, 3.5, 3.7, 6.2, 6.3]
Bednarek, M., & Caple, H.
(2012) News discourse. London: Bloomsbury. [14.6]
(2017) The discourse of news values: How news organisations create newsworthiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [14.6]
Bell, A.
(1991) The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell. [14.6]
Bell, A., & Garrett, P.
(Eds.) (1998) Approaches to media discourse. Oxford: Blackwell. [14.6]
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M.
(1987) The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.5, 13.6]
Berzlánovich, I., & Redeker, G.
(2012) Genre-dependent interaction of coherence and lexical cohesion in written discourse. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 8(1), 183–208. [10.2]
Bhatia, V. K.
(1993) Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman. [4.4, 14.4]
(2017) Critical genre analysis: Investigating interdiscursive performance in professional practice. London: Routledge. [4.4]
Biber, D.
(1989) A typology of English texts. Linguistics, 27, 3–43. [4.2, 10.2]
(2006) University language: A corpus-based study on spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [10.2]
Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T. A.
(2007) Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [5.6]
Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
(2001) Register variation: A corpus approach. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 175–196). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. [8.2]
(2009) Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [4.6.3, 8.2, 10.2]
Biber, D., & Gray, B.
(2016) Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [10.2]
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman. [4.3]
Birner, B., & Ward, G.
(Eds.) (1998) Information status and noncanonical word order in English. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [7.4]
Black, E.
(2006) Pragmatic stylistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. [8.6.2]
Blakemore, D. L.
(1992) Understanding utterances. Oxford: Blackwell. [2.5]
Blommaert, J.
(2005) Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [1]
Boden, D.
(1994) The business of talk: Organizations in action. Cambridge: Polity. [14.2]
Bolinger, D.
(1982) Language, the loaded weapon: The use and abuse of language today. London: Longman. [14.3]
Bosch, P.
(1983) Agreement and anaphora: A study in the role of pronouns in syntax and discourse. London: Academic Press. [6.2.2]
Bourdieu, P.
(1991) Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity. [15.3]
Bousfield, D.
Bousfield, D., & Locher, M. A.
(Eds.) (2008) Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [2.6]
Bowe, H., Martin, K., & Manns, H.
(2014) Communication across cultures: Mutual understanding in a global world (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [15.6]
Bradac, J.
(Ed.) (1989) Message effects in communication science. London: Sage. [12.4]
Bransford, J., Barclay, J., & Franks, J.
(1972) Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretative approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 193–209. [13.3]
Bransford, J., & Johnson, M.
(1973) Considerations of some problems of comprehension. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 383–438). London: Academic Press. [3.7, 4.5, 13.2]
Briggs, C.
(Ed.) (1996) Disorderly discourse, narrative conflict and inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [11.5]
Brinton, L.
(1996) Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [9.5]
Britton, B. K., & Black, J. B.
(Eds.) (1985) Understanding expository text: A theoretical and practical handbook for analyzing explanatory text. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [10.4]
Britton, B. K., & Graesser, A. C.
(Eds.) (1996) Models of understanding text. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.3]
Broek, P. van den, Linzie, B., Fletcher, C., & Marsolek, C.
(2000) The role of causal discourse structure in narrative writing. Memory and Cognition, 28, 711–721. [11.4]
Brône, G., & Vandaele, J.
(Eds.) (2009) Cognitive poetics: Goals, gains and gaps. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [8.6]
Brown, G., & Yule, G.
(1983) Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [1, 3.5, 3.7, 5.3, 6.3, 7.4]
Brown, P.
(2017) Politeness and impoliteness. In Y. Huang (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics (pp. 383–399). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [2.6]
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C.
(1978/1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [2.6]
Bublitz, W.
(2006) It utterly boggles the mind: Knowledge, common ground and coherence. In H. Pishwa (Ed.), Language and memory: Aspects of knowledge representation (pp. 359–386). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [6.3]
Bublitz, W., Jucker, A. H., & Schneider, K. P.
(Eds.) (2010–) Handbooks of pragmatics (HOPS). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [3.2]
Bublitz, W., Lenk, U., & Ventola, E.
(Eds.) (1999) Coherence in spoken and written discourse: How to create it and how to describe it. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [6.3]
Bucholtz, M., Liang, A., & Sutton, L.
(Eds.) (1999) Reinventing identities: The gendered self in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [15.4]
Bühler, K.
(1934/2011) Theory of language: The representational function of language (D. F. Goodwin and A. Eschbach, Trans.). Amsterdam: Benjamins. (Original work published 1934) [2.2, 6.2, 7.3]
Bultinck, B.
(2005) Numerous meanings: The meanings of English cardinals and the legacy of Paul Grice. Amsterdam: Elsevier. [2.4]
Burgoon, M.
(1989) Messages and persuasive effects. In J. J. Bradac (Ed.), Message effects in communication science (pp. 129–164). London: Sage. [12.4]
Burke, M.
(Ed.) (2014) The Routledge handbook of stylistics. Oxford: Routledge. [8.6, 8.7]
Caldas-Coulthard, C., & Leeuwen, T. van
(2002) Stunning, shimmering, iridescent: Toys as the representation of gendered social actors. In L. Litosseliti & J. Sunderland (Eds.), Gender identity and discourse analysis (pp. 91–108). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [15.4]
Candlin, C. N., & Sarangi, S.
(Eds.) (2011) Handbook of communication in organisations and professions. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [14.7]
Canestrelli, A. R., Mak, W. M., & Sanders, T. J.
(2013) Causal connectives in discourse processing: How differences in subjectivity are reflected in eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(9), 1394–1413. [6.5]
Canning, P., & Whiteley, S.
(Eds.) (2017) Stylistic approaches to reader response research: Special issue. Language and Literature, 26(2). [8.6]
Cap, P., & Dynel, M.
Carston, R.
(2002) Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Malden, MA: Blackwell. [2.5]
Chafe, W. L.
(1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–55). New York: Academic Press. [7.4.2]
(1982) Integration and involvement in speaking, writing and oral literature. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 35–53). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. [4.3]
(1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [13.5]
Chandler, D.
(2017) Semiotics: The basics (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. [3.2]
Chapman, S., & Clark, B.
(Eds.) (2014) Pragmatic literary stylistics. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. [8.6]
Cherny, L.
(1999) Conversation and community: Chat in a virtual world. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. [4.6]
Chilton, P.
(2004) Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge. [14.3]
Chilton, P., & Schäffner, C.
(Eds.) (2002) Politics as text and talk: Analytical approaches to political discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [14.3]
(2011) Discourse and politics. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 303–330). London: Sage. [14.3]
Clark, B.
(2013) Relevance theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [2.4, 2.5]
Clark, H. H.
(1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [3.4, 9.5]
(1997) Dogmas of understanding. Discourse Processes, 23, 567–598. [13.3]
Clark, H. H., & Haviland, S. E.
(1977) Comprehension and the given-new contract. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension (pp. 1–40). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. [7.4]
Clark, U.
(1996) An introduction to stylistics. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes. [8.2]
Clayman, S. E., & Gill, V. T.
(2014) Conversation analysis. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 120–134). London: Routledge. [9.2]
Clift, R.
(2014) Conversation analysis. In K. P. Schneider & A. Barron (Eds.), Pragmatics of discourse (pp. 97–124). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [9.1, 9.2, 9.3]
(2016) Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [9.2]
Coates, J. & Pichler, P.
(Ed.) (2011) Language and gender: A reader (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. [15.4]
Cook, G.
(1989) Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [1, 2.4]
Costermans, J., & Fayol, M.
(2014) Processing interclausal relationships: Studies in the production and comprehension of text. London: Psychology Press. [6.5]
Coulthard, M.
(1985) An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Longman. [1]
Coulthard, M., Johnson, A., & Wright, D.
(2017) An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in evidence. London: Routledge. [14.4]
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Kortmann, B.
(Eds.) (2000) Cause, condition, concession, contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [6.3]
Crystal, D.
(2005) The stories of English. London: Penguin. [7.3]
(2006) Language and the internet (2nd ed.). Cambridge: University Press. [4.3, 4.6, 4.6.1, 4.6.3]
(2008) Txtng: The gr8 db8. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [4.6.3]
(2011) Internet linguistics: A student guide. London: Routledge. [4.6]
Crystal, D., & Davy, D.
(1969) Investigating English style. London: Longman. [8.4]
Culpeper, J.
(2001) Language and characterisation: People in plays and other texts. London: Longman. [8.6.3]
(2011) Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [2.6]
Cutting, J.
(2008) Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. [2.5]
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E.
(2014) Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [8.6]
Daneš, F.
(1974) Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F. Daneš (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective (pp. 106–128). Prague: Academia. [5.3]
Das, D., & Taboada, M.
(2017) Signalling of coherence relations in discourse, beyond discourse markers. Discourse Processes, 1–29. [6.4]
Davis, B., & Brewer, J.
(1997) Electronic discourse: Linguistic individuals in virtual space. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. [4.6]
Davison, A., & Green, A. M.
(Eds.) (1988) Linguistic complexity and text comprehension: Readability issues reconsidered. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [10.3]
Davison, A., & Kantor, R.
(1982) On the failure of readability formulas to define readable texts: A case study from adaptations. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 187–209. [10.6]
De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A.
(2011) Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [11.3]
(Eds.) (2015) The handbook of narrative analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell. [11.3]
Delin, J., & Bateman, J.
Dennis, E., & Merrill, J.
(2002) Media debates: Issues in mass communication (3rd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman. [14.6]
Di Blas, N., & Paolini, P.
(2003) There and back again: What happens to phoric elements in a ‘web dialogue’. Document Design, 4, 194–206. [6.2]
Diederich, P. B., French, J. W., & Carlton, S. T.
(1961) Factors in judgments of writing ability. ETS Research Bulletin Series, 2, 1–93. [10.5]
Dijk, T. A. van
(1977) Text and context: Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London: Longman. [3.5]
(1980) Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [5.4, 5.5]
(1984) Prejudice in discourse: An analysis of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [15.5]
(1988) News analysis: Case studies of international and national news in the press. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [14.6]
(1993) Elite discourse and racism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [15.5]
(1996) Discourse, power and access. In C. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 84–104). London: Routledge. [15.3]
(1998) Ideology. London: Sage. [15.3]
(2008) Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [7.2]
(Ed.) (2011) Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (2nd ed.). London: Sage. [1]
(2014a) Discourse and knowledge. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 587–603). New York: Routledge. [13.2, 13.4]
(2014b) Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [15.5]
(2018) Socio-cognitive discourse studies. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 26–43). New York: Routledge. [15.3]
Dillon, G. L.
(1981) Constructing texts: Elements of a theory of composition and style. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [10.5]
Dimter, M.
(1981) Textklassenkonzepte heutiger Alltagssprache: Kommunikationssituation, Textfunktion und Textinhalt als Kategorien alltagssprachlicher Textklassifikation [Text classification concepts of current colloquial language: Communication situation, text function and text content as categories for text classification of colloquial language]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. [4.2]
Donahue, C., & Lillis, T.
(2014) Models of writing and text production. In E.-M. Jakobs & D. Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (pp. 55–78). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [13.5]
Dorgeloh, H.
(2005) Patterns of agentivity and narrativity in early science discourse. In J. Skaffari, M. Peikola, R. Carroll, R. Hiltunen & B. Wårvik (Eds.), Opening windows on texts and discourses of the past (pp. 83–94). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [10.2]
Doury, M.
(2009) Argument schemes typologies in practice: The case of comparative arguments. In F. H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Pondering on problems of argumentation (pp. 141–156). Dordrecht: Springer. [12.5]
Downs, C., & Goldhaber, G.
(1994) International Communication Association audit. In R. Rubin, P. Palmgreen & H. Sypher (Eds.), Communication research measures: A sourcebook (pp. 193–205). New York: Guilford. [10.6]
Drew, P., & Heritage, J.
(Eds.) (1992) Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [14.2]
Duchan, J. F., Bruder, G. A., & Hewitt, L. E.
(Eds.) (1995) Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [7.3]
Duffy, T.
(1985) Readability formulas: What’s the use? In T. Duffy & R. Waller (Eds.), Designing usable texts (pp. 113–143). Orlando, FL: Academic Press. [10.3]
Duranti, A.
(Ed.) (2009) Linguistic anthropology: A reader (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. [15.2]
Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C.
(Eds.) (1992) Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [3.5]
Dušková, L.
(2015) From syntax to text: The Janus face of functional sentence perspective. Prague: Karolinum Press. [5.3]
Duszak, A.
(Ed.) (1997) Culture and styles of academic discourse. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [14.2]
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S.
(2013) Language and gender (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [15.4]
Eco, U.
(1966) The narrative structure in Fleming. In U. Eco & O. Del Buono (Eds.), The Bond affair. London: McDonald. [11.2]
Edmondson, W. J.
(1981) Spoken discourse: A model for analysis. London: Longman. [9.4]
Eelen, G.
(2001) A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing. [2.6]
Eemeren, F. H. van
(Ed.) (2002) Advances in pragma-dialectics. Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [12.3]
(Ed.) (2017) Prototypical argumentative patterns: Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [12.3]
Eemeren, F. H. van, Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M.
(2014) Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer. [12.1, 12.2, 12.3]
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R.
(1994) Studies in pragma-dialectics. Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [12.3]
Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R., Blair, J. A., & Willard, C. A.
(Eds.) (1999) Proceedings of the 4th international conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [12.3]
Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, F.
(1996) Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [12.2]
Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.
(2002) Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [12.3]
Ehlich, K.
(Ed.) (1980) Erzählen im Alltag [Narrating in everyday life]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. [11.3]
(1995) The discourse of business negotiation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [14.2]
Ehlich, K., & Wagner, J.
(Eds.) (1995) The discourse of business communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [12.5]
Ehrlich, S.
(1980) Comprehension of pronouns. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 247–255. [6.2.2]
Ehrlich, S., Meyerhoff, M., & Holmes, J.
(Eds.) (2014) The handbook of language, gender, and sexuality (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell. [15.4]
Eisenlauer, V.
(2013) A critical hypertext analysis of social media: The true colours of Facebook. London: Continuum. [4.6.2, 4.6.3]
Emmott, C., Alexander, M., & Marszalek, A.
(2014) Schema theory in stylistics. In M. Burke (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics (pp. 268–283). Oxford: Routledge. [8.6.3]
Enkvist, N. E.
(1973) Linguistic stylistics. The Hague: Mouton. [8.3]
Epstein, J.
(1995) Altered conditions: Disease, medicine, and storytelling. New York: Routledge. [14.7]
Esser, J.
(2014) Taxonomies of discourse types. In K. P. Schneider & A. Barron (Eds.), Pragmatics of discourse (pp. 443–462). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [4.2]
Everett, C.
(2013) Linguistic relativity: Evidence across languages and cognitive domains. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [15.2]
Eysenck, M. W.
(2012) Fundamentals of cognition (2nd ed.). Hove: Psychology Press. [13.5]
Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T.
(2015) Cognitive psychology: A student’s handbook (7th ed.). London: Psychology Press. [13.2, 13.4, 13.5, 15.2]
Fairclough, N.
(1995/2013) Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. [15.3]
(1992/2015) Language and power (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. [3.7, 15.3]
Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N.
(2012) Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. London: Routledge. [14.3]
Fang, Y.-J.
(2001) Reporting the same events? A critical analysis of Chinese print news media texts. Discourse & Society, 12, 585–613. [14.6]
Fauconnier, G.
(1997) Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [13.2]
Fetzer, A.
(2012) Contexts in interaction: Relating pragmatic wastebaskets. In R. Finkbeiner, J. Meibauer & P. B. Schumacher (Eds.), What is a context? Linguistic approaches and challenges (pp. 105–127). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [7.2]
(2017) Context. In Y. Huang (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics (pp. 259–276). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [7.2]
Fetzer, A., & Meierkord, C.
(Eds.) (2002) Rethinking sequentiality: Linguistics meets conversational interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [9.5]
Fetzer, A., & Oishi, E.
Field, J.
(2003) Psycholinguistics: A resource book for students. London: Routledge. [13.5]
Fillenbaum, S.
(1974) Pragmatic normalization: Further results for some conjunctive and disjunctive sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 93–98. [13.3]
Finkbeiner, R., Meibauer, J., & Schumacher, P.
Firbas, J.
(1992) Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [5.3]
Fiske, J.
(2011) Introduction to communication studies (3rd ed.) London: Routledge. [3.4]
Flesch, R.
(1962) The art of readable writing. New York: Wiley. [10.3]
Flowerdew, J., Li, D., & Tran, S.
(2002) Discriminatory news discourse: Some Hong Kong data. Discourse & Society, 13, 319–345. [15.5]
Flowerdew, J., & Mahlberg, M.
Flowerdew, J., & Richardson, J. E.
(Eds.) (2018) The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies. London: Routledge. [1, 15.3]
Ford, C.
(1986) Overlapping relations in text structure. In S. DeLancey & R. Tomlin (Eds.), Proceedings of the second annual meeting of the Pacific Linguistics Conference (pp. 107–123). Oregon: University of Oregon. [6.5]
(1993) Grammar in interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [6.3]
Fowler, H. N.
(1977) Plato in twelve volumes: Vol. 4. Cratilus, Parmenides, Greater Hippias, Lesser Hippias. London: Heinemann. [2.2]
Fowler, R.
(1991) Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge. [7.5]
Fowler, R., Hodge, R., Kress, G., & Trew, T.
(1979) Language and control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. [15.3]
Fox, B. A.
(1987) Discourse structure and anaphora: Written and conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [6.2]
Frank, A. W.
(2013) The wounded storyteller: Body, illness, and ethics (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [14.7]
Freeman, M. H.
(2014) Cognitive poetics. In M. Burke (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics (pp. 313–328). Oxford: Routledge. [8.6.3]
Frehner, C.
(2008) E-Mail – SMS – MMS: The linguistic creativity of asynchronous discourse in the New Media Age. Bern: Peter Lang. [4.6.3]
Gabriel, Y.
(2015) Narratives and stories in organizational life. In A. de Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis (pp. 275–292). Malden, MA: Blackwell. [11.5]
Gardiner, A.
(1969) The theory of speech and language (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [2.2]
Gee, J. P.
(2014) An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. (4th ed.). London: Routledge. [1]
Gee, J. P., & Handford, M.
(Eds.) (2014) The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford: Routledge. [1]
Geeraerts, D., & Cuyckens, H.
(Eds.) (2007) The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [13.2]
Geis, M.
(1987) The language of politics. New York: Springer. [14.3]
Genette, G.
(1980) Narrative discourse: An essay in method. Oxford: Blackwell. [7.5]
Georgakopoulou, A.
(2006) Small and large identities in narrative (inter)action. In A. de Fina, D. Schiffrin & M. Bamberg (Eds.), Discourse and identity (pp. 83–102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [11.3]
(2015) Small stories research: Methods – analysis – outreach. In A. de Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), Handbook of narrative analysis (pp. 255–271). Malden, MA: Blackwell. [11.3]
Georgakopoulou, A., & Goutsos, D.
(2004) Discourse analysis: An introduction (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. [1]
Gernsbacher, M. A.
(1990) Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.3]
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Givón, T.
Ghadessy, M.
(Ed.) (1993) Register analysis: Theory and practice. London: Pinter. [8.2]
Gibbons, J.
(Ed.) (1994) Language and the law. London: Longman. [14.4]
(2003) Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Malden, MA: Blackwell. [14.4]
Giltrow, J.
(2010) Genre as difference: The sociality of linguistic variation. In H. Dorgeloh & A. Wanner (Eds.), Syntactic variation and genre (pp. 29–51). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [4.4]
(2017) Bridge to genre: Spanning technological change. In C. R. Miller & A. R. Kelly (Eds.), Emerging genres in new media environments (pp. 39–61). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. [4.4]
Giltrow, J., & Stein, D.
Givón, T.
(1989) Mind, code and context: Essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [5.3]
Glenberg, A. M.
(2002) The indexical hypothesis: Meaning from language, world, and image. In N. Allen (Ed.), Working with words and images: New steps in an old dance (pp. 27–42). Westport, CT: Ablex. [4.5]
Goatly, A.
(2000) Critical reading and writing: An introductory coursebook. London: Routledge. [1]
Goddard, A., & Patterson, L.
(2000) Language and gender. London: Routledge. [15.4]
Goetz, E., Anderson, R., & Schallert, D.
(1981) The representation of sentences in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 369–385. [13.3]
Goffman, E.
(1956) The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press. [2.6]
(1967) On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. In E. Goffman (Ed.), Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to face behavior (pp. 5–45). Chicago: Aldine. [2.6]
(1974) Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row. [13.3]
(1981) Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell. [2.6]
Graesser, A. C., & Bower, G. H.
(Eds.) (1990) Inferences and text comprehension. New York: Academic Press. [7.6]
Graesser, A. C., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Goldman, S. R.
(Eds.) (2003) Handbook of discourse processes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.3]
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z.
(2004) Coh-metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36(2), 193–202. [13.4]
Graumann, C. F., & Kallmeyer, W.
Green, G. M.
(1996) Pragmatics and natural language understanding (2nd ed.). New York: Erlbaum. [3.2]
Grice, H. P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press. [2.4]
(1989) Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [2.4]
Grimes, J. E.
(1975) The thread of discourse. The Hague: Mouton. [6.3]
Grosz, B., & Sidner, C.
(1986) Attention, intention and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12, 175–204. [6.5]
Gruber, H., & Redeker, G.
(2014) (Eds.). The pragmatics of discourse coherence: Theories and applications. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [6.3]
Grundy, P.
(2008) Doing pragmatics (3rd ed.). Oxford: Routledge. [2.5, 3.2]
Gumperz, J.
(1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [15.6]
Gumperz, J., & Levinson, S. C.
(Eds.) (1996) Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [15.2]
Gunnarsson, B. L.
(1984) Functional comprehensibility of legislative texts: Experiments with a Swedish act of parliament. Text, 4, 71–105. [10.6]
(1989) Text comprehensibility and the writing process: The case of law and lawmaking. Written Communication, 6, 86–107. [14.4]
Habermas, J.
(1981) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Bd. 1. Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung [The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reason and the rationalization of society]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. [2.2]
Haiman, J., & Thompson, S.
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1978) Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Arnold. [3.6, 8.2]
(2014) Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.), revised by C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Routledge. [3.5, 3.6, 6.2, 15.3]
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R.
(1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman. [6.2.1]
(1985) Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Victoria: Deakin University. [3.6]
Halliday, M. A. K., & Webster, J. J.
(2014) Text linguistics: The how and why of meaning. Sheffield: Equinox. [3.6, 6.2]
Hamilton, M., Hunter, J., & Burgoon, M.
(1990) An empirical test of an axiomatic model of the relationship between language intensity and persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9, 235–255. [8.4]
Hargie, O., Tourish, D., & Wilson, N.
(2002) Communication audits and the effects of increased information: A follow-up study. Journal of Business Communication, 39, 414–436. [10.6]
Harley, T. A.
(2014) The psychology of language: From data to theory (4th ed.). London: Psychology Press. [13.2]
Harris, Z.
(1952) Discourse analysis. Language, 28, 1–30. [1, 15.3]
Hart, C., & Cap, P.
(Eds.) (2014) Contemporary critical discourse studies. London: Bloomsbury. [15.3]
Have, P. ten
(2007) Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide (2nd ed.). London: Sage. [9.2]
Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H.
(1974) What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512–521. [7.6.2]
Hayes, J. R.
(1996) A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.5]
(2012) Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 369–388. [13.5]
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S.
(1986) Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist, 41, 1106–1113. [13.5, 13.6]
Heisler, T.
(1996) OK, a dynamic discourse marker in Montreal French. In J. Arnold, R. Blake, B. Davidson, S. Schwenter & J. Solomon (Eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: Data, theory and analysis (pp. 293–312). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. [9.5]
Hellinger, M., & Bußmann, H.
(Eds.) (2003) Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (3 vols.). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [15.4]
Heritage, J., & Clayman, S.
(2010) Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions. Chichester: Blackwell. [9.3]
Herman, D.
(2009) Basic elements of narrative. Oxford: Blackwell. [11.4]
Herring, S.
(1996) Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [4.6]
Herring, S., & Androutsopoulos, J.
(2015) Computer-mediated discourse 2.0. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed.) (pp. 127–151). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. [4.6.1]
Herring, S., Stein, D., & Virtanen, T.
(Eds.) (2013) Pragmatics of computer-mediated communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [4.6]
Heyd, T.
Hicks, D.
(Ed.) (1996) Discourse, learning, and schooling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [14.2]
Hillocks, G.
(1986) Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. New York: NCRE. [13.5]
Hodge, R., & Kress, G.
(1993) Language as ideology (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. [15.3]
Hoeken, H.
(2001) Convincing citizens: The role of argument quality. In D. Janssen & R. Neutelings (Eds.), Reading and writing public documents (pp. 147–169). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [12.5]
Hoey, M.
(1983) On the surface of discourse. London: Allen & Unwin. [5.3, 6.3]
(1991) Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [5.6]
(2001) Textual interaction: An introduction to written discourse analysis. London: Routledge. [1]
Hoffmann, C. R.
(Ed.) (2010) Narrative revisited: Telling a story in the age of new media. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [11.3]
(2012) Cohesive profiling: Meaning and interaction in personal weblogs. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [4.6.3, 6.2.1]
Hoffmann, C. R., & Bublitz, W.
(Eds.) (2017) Pragmatics of social media. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [4.6]
Hoffmann, L.
(1983) Kommunikation vor Gericht [Communication before the court]. Tübingen: Narr. [14.4]
Hofstede, G.
(2001) Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). London: Sage. [15.6]
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M.
(2010) Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. [15.6]
Holstein, J., & Gubrium, J.
(Eds.) (2012) Varieties of narrative analysis. London: Sage. [11.3]
Hosman, L., Huebner, T., & Siltanen, S.
(2002) The impact of power-of-speech style, argument strength, and need for cognition on impression formation, cognitive responses, and persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 361–379. [12.5]
Hovy, E., & Scott, D.
(Eds.) (1996) Computational and conversational discourse: Burning issues: An interdisciplinary account. Berlin: Springer. [6.5]
Huang, Y.
(2014) Pragmatics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [2.4, 3.2, 7.2, 7.3, 7.6.1]
Humboldt, W. von
(1836) Ueber die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts (Bd. 7) [On the variety of human language construction and its influence on the mental development of mankind (Vol. 7)]. Berlin: Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften. [8.2, 15.2]
Hunt, K. W.
(1970) Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults. Monographs of the society for research in child development, 35, 1–67. [13.6]
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R.
(2008) Conversation analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press. [9.2, 9.4]
Hyland, K.
(2005) Metadiscourse. London: Continuum. [10.2]
(2009) Academic discourse: English in a global context. London: Continuum. [10.2]
Hymes, D.
(1972) Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35–71). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. [3.5]
Jackson, J.
(Ed.) (2012) The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication. London: Routledge. [15.6]
(2014) Introducing language and intercultural communication. London: Routledge. [15.6]
Jakobs, E.-M., & Perrin, D.
(Eds.) (2014) Handbook of writing and text production. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [13.5]
Jakobson, R.
(1960) Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [4.2, 8.5]
Jansen, C., & Steehouder, M.
(2001) How research can lead to better government forms. In D. Janssen & R. Neutelings (Eds.), Reading and writing public documents (pp. 12–36). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [14.5]
Janssen, D., & Neutelings, R.
Jarvella, R.
(1971) Syntactic processing of connected speech. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 409–416. [13.3]
Jaworski, A.
(Ed.) (1997) Silence: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [9.3]
Jaworski, A., & Coupland, N.
(2014) The discourse reader (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. [1]
Jefferson, G.
(1978) Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 219–248). New York: Academic Press. [9.2]
Jeffries, L., & McIntyre, D.
(2010) Stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [8.4, 8.6]
Jespersen, O.
(1924/2007) The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin. [2.2]
Johnson-Laird, P. N.
(1983) Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [3.7, 13.2]
Johnstone, B.
(2016) ‘Oral versions of personal experience’: Labovian narrative analysis and its uptake. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(4), 542–560. [11.3]
(2018) Discourse analysis (3rd ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. [1.1, 3.5, 3.7]
Jonassen, D.
(1982) Advance organizers in text. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), The technology of text (pp. 253–275). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology. [5.5]
Jones, J. G., & Simons, H. W.
(2017) Persuasion in society (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge. [12.5]
Jones, R. H.
(2012) Discourse analysis: A resource book for students. Oxford: Routledge. [1]
Jones, S.
(Ed.) (1995) Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [4.6]
Jong, M. de, & Schellens, P.
(1997) Reader-focused text-evaluation: An overview of goals and methods. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 11, 402–432. [10.4]
Jucker, A.
(2002) Hypertextlinguistics: Textuality and typology of hypertexts. In A. Fischer, G. Tottie & H. M. Lehmann (Eds.), Text types and corpora: Studies in honour of Udo Fries (pp. 29–51). Tübingen: Narr. [4.6.2]
Jucker, A., & Smith, S.
(1998) And people just you know like ‘wow’: Discourse markers as negotiating strategies. In A. Jucker & Y. Ziv (Eds.), Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory (pp. 171–202). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [9.5]
Jucker, A., & Taavitsainen, I.
(2013) English historical pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. [7.3]
Jucker, A., & Ziv, Y.
Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J.
(2008) Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics and speech recognition (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. [6.2, 13.4]
Kádár, D. Z., & Haugh, M.
(2013) Understanding politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [2.6]
Kallmeyer, W., et al.
(1980) Lektürekolleg zur Textlinguistik. Bd. 1. Einführung [Lecture on text linguistics: Vol. 1. Introduction]. Königstein: Athenäum. [6.2]
Katz Bourns, S., & Myers, L.
Kennedy, G. A.
(1994) A new history of classical rhetoric. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [8.2]
Kent, T.
(Ed.) (1999) Post-process theory: Beyond the writing-process paradigm. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. [13.6]
Kintsch, W.
(1988) The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182. [13.4]
(1998) Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [5.2, 13.4]
Kintsch, W., & Dijk, T. A. van
(1978) Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological review, 85, 363–394. [13.3, 13.4]
Kintsch, W., & Vipond, D.
(1979) Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory. In L. G. Nilsson (Ed.), Perspectives on memory research (pp. 329–365). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [5.2, 10.3]
Kirsch, G., & Roen, D. H.
(1990) A sense of audience in written communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [13.5]
Klein-Braley, C.
(1982) On the suitability of cloze tests as measures of reading comprehension. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen, 13, 49–61. [10.4]
Knott, A.
(1993) Using cue phrases to determine a set of rhetorical relations. In O. Rambow (Ed.), Intentionality and structure in discourse relations: Proceedings of the ACL SIGGEN Workshop (pp. 48–51). Columbus: Ohio State University. [6.5]
Knott, A., & Sanders, T.
(1998) The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: An exploration of two languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 135–175. [6.5]
Koenig, J.-P.
(Ed.) (1998) Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap. Stanford, CA: CSLI. [13.3]
Koester, A.
(2010) Workplace discourse. London: Continuum. [14.1, 14.2]
Koller, V.
(2008) Lesbian discourses: Images of a community. New York: Routledge. [15.4]
König, E., & Pfister, M.
(2017) Literary analysis and linguistics. Berlin: Erich Schmidt. [8.5]
Kotthoff, H., & Spencer-Oatey, H.
(Eds.) (2007) Handbook of intercultural communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [15.6]
Kress, G.
(1989) Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [3.6, 6.2]
(2010) Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge. [4.5]
Kress, G., & Leeuwen, T. van
(2001) Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold. [4.5]
(2006) Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. [4.5]
Krieken, K. van, & Sanders, J.
(2017) Framing narrative journalism as a new genre: A case study of the Netherlands. Journalism, 18(10), 1364–1380. [11.3]
Kuno, S.
(1987) Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse and empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [7.5]
Kuppevelt, J. van
(1995) Discourse structure, topicality and questioning. Journal of Linguistics, 31, 109–147. [4.3]
Kurzon, D.
Kyratzis, A.
(1999) Narrative identity: Preschoolers’ self-construction through narrative in friendship group dramatic play. Narrative Inquiry, 9, 427–455. [11.5]
Labov, W.
(1972) Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. [11.3]
(2013) The language of life and death: The transformation of experience in oral narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [11.3]
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J.
(1967) Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press. [11.3]
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [15.2]
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [8.6.3]
Lakoff, R. T.
(1975/2004) Language and woman’s place: Text and commentaries (revised and expanded ed.), edited by Mary Bucholtz. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [15.4]
Lambrou, M.
(2014) Stylistics, conversation analysis and the cooperative principle. In M. Burke (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics (pp. 136–154). Oxford: Routledge. [8.6.2]
Langacker, R. W.
(2002) Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar (2nd ed.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [13.2]
(2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [13.2]
Lanham, R. A.
(1991) A handlist of rhetorical terms (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. [8.2]
Lasswell, H.
(1948) The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas. New York: Harper and Row. [12.4]
Lavendera, B.
(1988) The study of language in its socio-cultural context. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey. Vol. 4. Language: The socio-cultural context (pp. 1–13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [15.6]
Leap, W. L.
(2015) Queer linguistics as critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed.) (pp. 661–680). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. [15.4]
Leech, G.
(1983) Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman. [2.4, 2.6, 3.2]
(2008) Language in literature: Style and foregrounding. London: Routledge. [8.5]
(2014) The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [2.6]
Leeuwen, T. van
(1996) The representation of social actors. In C. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 32–70). London: Routledge. [15.3]
(2005) Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge. [4.5]
(2015) Multimodality. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed.) (pp. 447–465). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. [4.5]
Lentz, L., & Pander Maat, H.
(Eds.) (1997) Discourse analysis and evaluation: Functional approaches. Amsterdam: Rodopi. [10.5]
Levelt, W. J. M.
(1982) Cognitive styles in the use of spatial direction terms. In R. J. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place and action: Studies in deixis and related topics (pp. 251–268). Chichester: Wiley. [7.3]
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [7.3, 13.5]
Levinson, S. C.
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [2.6, 3.2, 7.3, 7.6, 9.3, 9.4]
(2004) Deixis. In L. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 97–121). Oxford: Blackwell. [7.3]
(2017) Speech acts. In Y. Huang (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics (pp. 199–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [2.3]
Levy, M., & Randell, S.
(Eds.) (1996) The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.6]
Lewis, D.
(2002) Convention. Oxford: Blackwell. [3.3]
Liddicoat, A. J.
(2011) An introduction to conversation analysis. London: Continuum. [9.2, 9.4, 11.3]
Liebert, W.-A., Redeker, G., & Waugh, L.
Limberg, H.
(2010) The interactional organization of academic talk: Office hour consultations. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [10.2]
Linde, C.
(1993) Life stories: The creation of coherence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [11.5]
(2008) Working the past: Narrative and institutional memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [11.5]
Litosseliti, L., & Sunderland, J.
Locher, M. A.
(2014) Electronic discourse. In K. P. Schneider & A. Barron (Eds.), Pragmatics of discourse (pp. 555–581). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [4.6, 4.6.3]
Longacre, R. E.
(1996) The grammar of discourse (2nd ed.). New York: Plenum Press. [6.3]
Louwerse, M., & Peer, W. van der
Luff, P., & Heath, C.
(2015) Transcribing embodied action. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed.) (pp. 367–390). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. [9.2]
Luhmann, N.
(1970 and 1975) Soziologische Aufklärung (Bd. 1 & 2) [Sociological enlightenment (Vols. 1 & 2)]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. [14.2]
Macdonell, D.
(1986) Theories of discourse: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell. [3.7]
Mahlberg, M.
(2013) Corpus stylistics and Dickens’s fiction. New York: Routledge. [8.6]
(2014) Corpus stylistics. In M. Burke (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics (pp. 378–392). Oxford: Routledge. [8.6.1]
Maier, R. M., Hofmockel, C., & Fetzer, A.
(2016) The negotiation of discourse relations in context: Co-constructing degrees of overtness. Intercultural Pragmatics, 13(1), 71–105. [7.2]
Malinowski, B.
(1930) The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards (Eds.), The meaning of meaning (pp. 296–336). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. [4.2]
Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S.
(1977) Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111–151. [11.4]
Mann, W. C., & Thompson, S. A.
(1988) Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organisation. Text, 8, 243–281. [6.4]
(Eds.) (1992) Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [1]
(2001) Deux perspectives sur la théorie de la structure Rhétorique [Two views of Rhetorical Structure Theory]. Verbum, 23, 9–30. [6.4]
Markee, N.
(Ed.) (2015) The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction. Malden, MA: Blackwell. [14.2]
Marmaridou, S.
Martin, J.
(2015) Cohesion and texture. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. [6.2]
Martin, J., & Rose, D.
(2007) Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury Academic. [3.6]
Mayer, R.
(1979) Twenty years of research on advance organizers: Assimilation theory is still the best predictor of results. Instructional Science, 8, 133–167. [5.5]
Mayr, A.
(2008) Language and power: An introduction to institutional discourse. London: Continuum. [14.1]
(2015) Institutional discourse. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 755–774). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. [14.2]
McCarthy, M.
(1991) Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [1]
McCroskey, J. C.
(2006) An introduction to rhetorical communication: A Western rhetorical perspective (9th ed.). London: Routledge. [12.2]
McIntyre, D.
(2014) Characterisation. In P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of stylistics (pp. 149–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [8.6.3]
McIntyre, D., & Busse, B.
(Eds.) (2010) Language and style. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. [8.3]
McLaughlin, M. L.
(1984) Conversation: How talk is organized. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. [9.3]
McMenamin, G.
(2002) Forensic linguistics: Advances in forensic stylistics. Boca Raton: CRC. [8.4, 14.4]
McNamara, D. S.
(Ed.) (2007) Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [13.2]
McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J.
(2009) Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 297–384. [13.4]
Meibauer, J.
(2012) What is a context? Theoretical and empirical evidence. In R. Finkbeiner, J. Meibauer & P. Schumacher (Eds.), What is a context? Linguistic approaches and challenges (pp. 9–32). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [7.2]
Miller, C. R.
(1984) Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–167. [4.4]
(2017) Where do genres come from? In C. R. Miller & A. R. Kelly (Eds.), Emerging genres in new media environments (pp. 1–34). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. [4.4]
Miller, G.
(1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97. [13.3]
Mishler, E.
(1984) The discourse of medicine. Norwoord, NJ: Ablex. [14.7]
Mondada, L.
(2013) The conversation analytic approach to data collection. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 32–56). Chichester: Blackwell. [9.2]
Moore, J., & Pollack, M.
(1992) A problem for RST: The need for multi-level discourse analysis. Computational Linguistics, 18, 537–544. [6.5]
Morris, C.
(1938) Foundations of the theory of signs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [3.2]
Morris, P.
(Ed.) (1994) The Bakhtin reader: Selected writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev and Voloshinov. London: Arnold. [2.5, 4.3]
Moser, M., & Moore, J.
(1996) Toward a synthesis of two accounts of discourse structure. Computational Linguistics, 22, 409–419. [6.5]
Motschenbacher, H.
(2010) Language, gender and sexual identity: Poststructuralist perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [15.4]
Müller, S.
Myers, G.
(2010) Discourse of blogs and wikis. London: Continuum. [4.6]
Myers, J. L., & O’Brien, E. J.
(1998) Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131–157. [13.4]
Neumann, S., & Fest, J.
(2016) Cohesive devices across registers and varieties: The role of medium in English. In C. Schubert & C. Sanchez-Stockhammer (Eds.), Variational text linguistics: Revisiting register in English (pp. 195–220). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [6.2]
Ng, S. H., & Bradac, J. J.
(1993) Power in language: Verbal communication and social influence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [15.3]
Nielsen, J.
(1999) Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Press. [4.6]
Niemeier, S., & Dirven, R.
Nofsinger, R. E.
(1991) Everyday conversation. London: Sage. [9.4]
Noordman, L., & Vonk, W.
(1992) Reader’s knowledge and the control of inferences in reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, 373–391. [7.6]
(1999) Discourse comprehension. In A. Friederici (Ed.), Language comprehension: A biological perspective (pp. 229–263). Berlin: Springer. [13.3]
Nørgaard, N., Busse, B. & Montoro, R.
(2010) Key terms in stylistics. London: Continuum. [8.3, 8.6]
Nunan, D.
(1993) Introducing discourse analysis. London: Penguin. [1]
Nystrand, M.
(1986) The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between writers and readers. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. [4.3]
Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A.
(Eds.) (1996) Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [9.4]
O’Keefe, D. J.
(2016) Persuasion: Theory and research (3rd ed.). London: Sage. [12.1, 12.5]
Ordóñez-López, P., & Edo-Marzá, N.
(Eds.) (2016) Medical discourse in professional, academic and popular settings. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. [14.7]
Orr, J.
(1996) Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. London: Cornell University Press. [11.5]
Ortony, A.
(Ed.) (1993) Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [8.6]
Osgood, C.
(1971) Where do sentences come from? In D. Steinberg & L. Jakobovits (Eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology (pp. 497–529). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [7.4.2]
Otero, J., León, J. A., & Graesser, A. C.
(Eds.) (2002) The psychology of science text comprehension. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.3]
Padilla Cruz, M.
(Ed.) (2016) Relevance theory: Recent developments, current challenges and future directions. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [2.5]
Page, R.
(2012) Stories and social media: Identities and interaction. Abingdon: Routledge. [11.3]
Paltridge, B.
(2012) Discourse analysis (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury. [1]
Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S.
(Eds.) (2013) The handbook of English for specific purposes. Chichester: Blackwell. [10.2]
Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C.
Peccei, J. S.
(1999) Pragmatics. London: Routledge. [3.2]
Peirce, C. S.
(1992) The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings. 2 vols. Ed. N. Houser & C. Kloesel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [3.2]
Pemberton, L., & Shurville, S.
(Eds.) (2000) Words on the web: Computer-mediated communication. Exeter: Intellect. [4.6]
Pericles Trifonas, P.
(Ed.) (2015) International handbook of semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer. [3.2]
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T.
(1986) Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer. [12.4]
Philips, S.
(1998) Ideology in the language of judges: How judges practice law, politics and courtroom control. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [14.4]
Piller, I.
(2011) Intercultural communication: A critical introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. [15.6]
Platt, F. W.
(Ed.) (1995) Conversation repair: Case studies in doctor-patient communication. Boston: Little, Brown. [14.7]
Polanyi, L., & Berg, M. H. van den
(1996) Discourse structure and discourse contexts. In P. Dekker & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Amsterdam Colloquium (pp. 113–131). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. [5.5]
Ponterotto, D.
(2003) The cohesive role of cognitive metaphor in discourse and conversation. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 283–298). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [8.6.3]
Price, J., & Price, L.
(2002) Hot text: Web writing that works. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Press. [4.6]
Prince, E. F.
(1981) Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 223–255). New York: Academic Press. [7.4.2, 11.4]
(1997) On the functions of left-dislocation in English discourse. In A. Kamio (Ed.), Directions in functional linguistics (pp. 117–143). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [7.4]
Propp, V. J.
(1968) Morphology of the folktale (2nd ed.). (S. Pírková-Jakobsonová, Ed., L. Scott, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University. (Original work published 1928) [11.2]
(1984) Theory and history of folklore (A. Liberman, Ed., A. Martin & P. Martin, Trans.). Manchester: Manchester University Press. (Original work published 1946) [11.2]
Queen, R.
(2014) Language and sexual identities. In S. Ehrlich, M. Meyerhoff & J. Holmes (Eds.), The handbook of language, gender, and sexuality (pp. 203–219) (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell. [15.4]
Queneau, R.
(1947/1981) Exercises in style (B. Wright, Trans.). New York: New Directions. [8.2]
Raffler-Engel, W. von
(Ed.) (1990) Doctor-patient interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [14.7]
Rambow, O.
(Ed.) (1993) Intentionality and structure in discourse relations: Proceedings of the ACL SIGGEN Workshop. Columbus: Ohio State University. [6.5]
Reid, T. B. W.
(1956) Linguistics, structuralism and philology. Archivum Linguisticum, 8, 28–37. [8.2]
Reisigl, M.
(2014) Argumentation analysis and the discourse-historical approach: A methodological framework. In C. Hart & P. Cap (Eds.), Contemporary critical discourse studies (pp. 67–96). London: Bloomsbury. [15.3]
(2018) The discourse-historical approach. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 44–59). New York: Routledge. [15.5]
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R.
(2001) Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. [15.5]
Renkema, J.
(1984) Text linguistics and media: An experimental inquiry into coloured news reporting. In W. van Peer & J. Renkema (Eds.), Pragmatics and stylistics (pp. 317–371). Leuven: Acco. [7.5]
(2009a) The texture of discourse: Towards an outline of connectivity theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [6.6]
(2009b) Improving the quality of governmental documents: A combined academic and professional approach. In W. Cheng & K. C. C. Kong (Eds.), Professional communication: Collaboration between academics and practitioners (pp. 173–190). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. [10.5]
(Ed.) (2009c) Discourse, of course: An overview of research in discourse studies. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [1]
Renkema, J., & Hoeken, H.
(1998) The influence of negative newspaper publicity on corporate image in the Netherlands. Journal of Business Communication, 35, 521–535. [14.6]
Richardson, J. E.
(2007) Analysing newspapers: An approach from critical discourse analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan. [14.6]
Rijn-van Tongeren, G. van
(1997) Metaphors in medical texts. Amsterdam: Rodopi. [14.7]
Roberts, C., Davies, E., & Jupp, T.
(1992) Language and discrimination: A study of communication in multi-ethnic workplaces. London: Longman. [15.5]
Roque, G.
(Ed.) (2012) Special issue: Persuasion and argumentation. Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning, 26(1). [12.1]
Rouet, J.-F., Levonen, J., & Dillon, A.
(Eds.) (1996) Hypertext and cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [4.6]
Roulet, E.
(1984) Speech acts, discourse structure, and pragmatic connectives. Journal of Pragmatics, 8, 31–47. [4.3]
Sacks, H., Jefferson, G., & Schegloff, E. A.
(1992) Lectures on conversation (2 vols.). Oxford: Blackwell. [9.2, 11.3]
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. [9.3]
Salkie, R.
(1995) Text and discourse analysis. London: Routledge. [1]
Sanders, T., Schilperoord, J., & Spooren, W.
(Eds.) (2001) Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [6.5]
Sanders, T., & Spooren, W.
(1999) Communicative intentions and coherence relations. In W. Bublitz, U. Lenk & E. Ventola (Eds.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 235–250). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [6.5]
Sanders, T., Spooren, W., & Noordman, L.
(1992) Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 15, 1–36. [6.5]
Sanford, A. J.
(1990) On the nature of text-driven inference. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d’Arcais & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 515–535). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [7.6]
Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C.
(1981) Understanding written language: Explorations of comprehension beyond the sentence. Chichester: Wiley. [6.2, 7.6, 13.3]
Sapir, E.
(1949) Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture, and personality. Berkeley: University of California Press. [15.2]
Sarangi, S., & Slembrouck, S.
(1996) Language, bureaucracy & social control. London: Longman. [14.5]
Sbisà, M., & Turner, K.
(Eds.) (2013) Pragmatics of speech actions. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [2.3]
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P.
(1977) Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.3]
Schank, R. C., & Lebowitz, M.
(1980) Levels of understanding in computers and people. Poetics, 9, 251–273. [13.2]
Schegloff, E. A.
(1977) On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In W. Dressler (Ed.), Current trends in textlinguistics (pp. 81–102). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [9.4]
(2007) Sequence organization in interaction. Vol. 1: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [9.2, 9.5]
(2015) Conversational interaction: The embodiment of human sociality. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed.) (pp. 346–366). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. [9.3, 9.4]
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H.
(1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327. [9.3]
Schiffrin, D.
(1987) Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [9.5]
(1997) Stories in answer to questions in research interviews. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 129–137. [11.5]
Schleppegrell, M. J.
(2014) Systemic functional linguistics. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 21–34). Oxford: Routledge. [3.6]
Schmolz, H.
(2015) Anaphora resolution and text retrieval: A linguistic analysis of hypertexts. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [4.6.2, 6.2]
Schneider, K. P., & Barron, A.
(Eds.) (2008) Variational pragmatics: A focus on regional varieties in pluricentric languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [15.6]
(Eds.) (2014) Pragmatics of discourse. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [1]
Schriver, K.
(1997) Dynamics in document design: Creating text for readers. New York: Wiley [10.4]
(2017) Plain language in the US gains momentum: 1940–2015. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 60(4), 343–383. [14.4]
Schubert, C.
(2014) Cognitive categorization and prototypicality as persuasive strategies: Presidential rhetoric in the USA. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(2), 313–335. [14.3]
(2016) Introduction: Current trends in register research. In C. Schubert & C. Sanchez-Stockhammer (Eds.), Variational text linguistics: Revisiting register in English (pp. 1–15). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [8.2]
(2017a) Constructing Mexican stereotypes: Telecinematic discourse and Donald Trump’s campaign rhetoric. CADAAD Journal: Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 8(2), 37–57. [15.5]
(2017b) Discourse and cohesion. In C. R. Hoffmann & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Pragmatics of social media (pp. 317–344). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [4.6.2]
Schubert, C., & Sanchez-Stockhammer, C.
(Eds.) (2016) Variational text linguistics: Revisiting register in English. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [8.2]
Schubert, C., & Volkmann, L.
(Eds.) (2016) Pragmatic perspectives on postcolonial discourse: Linguistics and literature. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars [8.6.2]
Scollon, R., Scollon, S., & Jones, R.
(2001/2012) Intercultural communication: A discourse approach (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. [15.6]
Searle, J. R.
(1969) Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [2.3.1, 2.3.2]
(1975) Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics. Vol 3: Speech Acts (pp. 59–82). New York: Academic Press. [2.3.2]
(1976) A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1–23. [2.3.2]
Searle, J. R., et al.
Semino, E., & Culpeper, J.
(Eds.) (2002) Cognitive stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [8.6]
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W.
(1949) The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. [3.4]
Shmelev, A.
(2001) Manipulation in Russian political journalism. Studies in Communication Sciences, 1, 101–116. [14.3]
Short, M.
(1996) Exploring the language of poems, plays and prose. London: Longman. [8.6.2]
(2014) Analysing dialogue. In P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of stylistics (pp. 344–359). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [8.6.2]
Shuy, R. W.
(1993) Language crimes: The use and abuse of language evidence in the courtroom. Oxford: Blackwell. [14.4]
Sidnell, J.
(2010) Conversation analysis: An introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. [9.2, 9.4, 9.5]
Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T.
(Eds.) (2013) The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. [9.2]
Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M.
(2014) Systemic-functional approaches to discourse. In K. P. Schneider & A. Barron (Eds.), Pragmatics of discourse (pp. 125–163). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [3.6]
Singer, M.
(1990) Psychology of language: An introduction to sentence and discourse processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.2]
Smith, N., & Wilson, D.
(1979) Modern linguistics: The results of Chomsky’s revolution. Brighton: Harvester Press. [2.5]
Smith, R. C.
(1996) The patient’s story: Integrated patient-doctor interviewing. Boston: Little, Brown. [14.7]
Sotirova, V.
(Ed.) (2016) The Bloomsbury companion to stylistics. London: Bloomsbury. [8.3]
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(1986/1995) Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. [2.5]
Statham, S.
(2016) Redefining trial by media: Towards a critical-forensic linguistic interface. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [14.6]
Stede, M.
(2012) Discourse processing. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool [5.6]
Stein, N. L., & Policastro, M.
(1984) The concept of a story: A comparison between children’s and teachers’ viewpoints. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Comprehension of text (pp. 113–155). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [11.4]
Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Rossano, F., Ruiter, J. P. de, Yoon, K.-E., & Levinson, S. C.
(2009) Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. PNAS, 106(26), 10587–10592. [9.3]
Stockwell, P.
(2002) Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge. [8.6.3]
Stockwell, P., & Whiteley, S.
(Ed.) (2014) The Cambridge handbook of stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [8.6]
Strauss, S., & Feiz, P.
(2014) Discourse analysis: Putting our worlds into words. New York: Routledge. [1]
Strunk, W., & White, E.
(2000) The elements of style (4th ed.). Boston: Ellyn and Bacon. [8.4]
Stubbs, M. W.
(1983) Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford: Blackwell. [1, 3.7]
(1996) Text and corpus analysis: Computer-assisted studies of language and culture. Oxford: Blackwell. [14.2]
(2014) Quantitative methods in literary linguistics. In P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of stylistics (pp. 46–62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [8.6.1]
Stukker, N., Spooren, W., & Steen, G.
(Eds.) (2016) Genre in language, discourse and cognition. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [6.5]
Stygall, G.
(2012) Discourse in the US courtroom. In P. Tiersma & L. M. Solan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and law (pp. 369–380). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [14.4]
Sumner, W. G.
(1906) Folkways. New York: Dover Publications. [14.2]
Sunderland, J.
(2006) Language and gender: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge. [15.4]
Svartvik, J., & Quirk, R.
(Eds.) (1980) A corpus of English conversation. Lund: CWK Gleerup. [9.2, 9.3]
Swales, J.
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [4.4]
Sweetser, E.
(1990) From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [6.3]
Taboada, M.
(2004) Building coherence and cohesion: Task-oriented dialogue in English and Spanish. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [6.3]
Taboada, M., & Mann, W. C.
(2006a) Rhetorical structure theory: Looking back and moving ahead. Discourse Studies, 8, 423–459. [6.4]
(2006b) Applications of rhetorical structure theory. Discourse Studies, 8, 567–588. [6.4]
Tagg, C.
(2012) The discourse of text messaging: Analysis of SMS communication. London: Continuum. [4.6]
Tannen, D.
(1988) Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and understanding. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. [3.7]
(1994) Gender and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [15.4]
Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. E., & Schiffrin, D.
(Eds.) (2015) The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. [1]
Tanskanen, S.-K.
(2006) Collaborating towards coherence: Lexical cohesion in English discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [6.2.1, 6.3]
Taylor, J. R.
(1993) Rethinking the theory of organizational communication: How to read an organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. [14.2]
Thurlow, C., & Mroczek, K.
(Eds.) (2011) Digital discourse: Language in the new media. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [4.6]
Tiersma, P. M. & Solan, L. M.
(Eds.) (2012) The Oxford handbook of language and law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [14.4]
Titjen, F.
(2018) Language and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [15.4]
Toolan, M.
(2001) Narrative: A critical linguistic introduction (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. [11.3]
(Ed.) (2002) Critical discourse analysis: Critical concepts in linguistics (4 vols.). London: Routledge. [15.3]
(2016) Making sense of narrative text: Situation, repetition, and picturing in the reading of short stories. New York: Routledge. [11.4]
Torrance, M., & Galbraith, D.
(Eds.) (1999) Knowing what to write: Cognitive perspectives on conceptual processes in text production. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. [13.6]
Toulmin, S. E.
(1958/2003) The uses of argument (updated ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [12.2]
Tseng, C.-I.
(2013) Cohesion in film: Tracking film elements. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. [6.2]
Tufte, V.
(1971) Grammar as style. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. [8.4]
Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H.-J.
(2006) An introduction to cognitive linguistics (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education. [13.2]
Uyl, M. den
(1983) A cognitive perspective on text coherence. In K. Ehlich & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Connectedness in sentence, discourse and text (pp. 259–283). Tilburg: Tilburg University. [3.7]
Vanderveken, D., & Kubo, S.
Vanneste, A.
(1980) Unité et multiplicité dans la langue: Essai d’introduction à la problématique de la norme et de la variabilité [Unity and multiplicity in language: Introduction to the problems of norm and variability] (3 vols.). Brussel: Vrije Universiteit. [3.3, 3.5]
Ventola, E., Charles, C., & Kaltenbacher, M.
Verschueren, J.
(1999) Understanding pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [3.2]
Verschueren, J., Östman, J. O., & Blommaert, J.
Virtanen, T.
(2010) Variation across texts and discourses: Theoretical and methodological perspectives on text type and genre. In H. Dorgeloh & A. Wanner (Eds.), Syntactic variation and genre (pp. 53–84). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [10.2]
Vonk, W., & Noordman, L.
(1990) On the control of inferences in text understanding. In D. Balota, G. Flores d’Arcais & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 447–464). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [7.6]
Vorderer, P., Wulff, H., & Friedrichsen, M.
(Eds.) (1996) Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [11.4]
Waes, L. van, Woudstra, E., & Hoven, P. van den
(Eds.) (1994) Functional communication quality. Amsterdam: Rodopi. [10.5]
Wales, K.
(1988) Back to the future: Bakhtin, stylistics and discourse. In W. van Peer (Ed.), The taming of the text (pp. 176–192). London: Routledge. [4.3]
Walsh, S.
(2011) Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. London: Routledge. [14.2]
Walton, D. N.
(2006) Fundamentals of critical argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [12.5]
Watson Todd, R.
Watts, R. J.
(2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [2.6]
Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., & Jackson, D.
(1967/2011) Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton. [3.2]
Weaver, C. A., Mannes, S., & Fletcher, C. R.
(Eds.) (1995) Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [13.3]
Weber, J. J.
(Ed.) (1996) The stylistics reader: From Roman Jakobson to the present. London: Arnold. [8.6]
Wegener, P.
(1885/1991) Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen des Sprachlebens: Reprint from the 1885 edition [Inquiries into the fundamental questions of language survival]. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [2.2]
Werlich, E.
(1982) A text grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle and Meyer. [3.7, 4.2, 10.2]
Whorf, B. L.
(1956/2012) Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (2nd ed.), edited by J. B. Carroll, S. C. Levinson & P. Lee. Massachusetts: The MIT Press. [15.2]
Widdowson, H.
(1998) The theory and practice of critical discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics, 19, 136–151. [15.3]
(2007) Discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [1, 3.7, 6.2]
Wierzbicka, A.
(1986) Does language reflect culture? Evidence from Australian English. Language in Society, 15, 349–374. [15.2]
Wijk, C. van
(1999) Conceptual processes in argumentation: A developmental perspective. In M. Torrance & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 31–50). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. [13.5]
Wildfeuer, J.
(2014) Film discourse interpretation: Towards a new paradigm for multimodal film analysis. London: Routledge. [4.5]
Wilson, D.
(2017) Relevance theory. In Y. Huang (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics (pp. 79–100). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [2.5]
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D.
(2012) Relevance and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [2.5]
Winter, E.
(1976) Fundamentals of information structure: Pilot manual for further development according to student need (Mimeograph). Hatfield: Hatfield Polytechnic. [5.3]
Witte, S. P.
(1987) Pre-text and composing. College Composition and Communication, 38, 397–425. [13.6]
Wodak, R.
(1996) Disorders of discourse. London: Longman. [14.7]
(Ed.) (1997) Gender and discourse. London: Sage. [15.4]
(2015) The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. London: Sage. [15.5]
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M.
(Eds.) (2016) Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). London: Sage. [15.3]
Wodak, R., & Richardson, J. E.
(Eds.) (2013) Analyzing fascist discourse: European fascism in talk and text. New York: Routledge. [15.5]
Yang, A.
(1989) Cohesive chains and writing quality. Word, 40, 235–254. [10.5]
Yates, S.
(1996) Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing: A corpus based study. In S. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 28–46). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [4.6.1]
Yule, G.
(2014) The study of language (5th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [15.2]
Yus, F.
(2015) Relevance theory. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (2nd ed.) (pp. 642–662). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [2.5]
Zappavigna, M.
(2012) Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the web. London: Bloomsbury. [4.6.3]
Zethsen, K. K., & Askehave, I.
(2006) Medical communication: Professional-lay. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (2nd ed.) (pp. 644–664). Oxford: Elsevier. [14.7]
Zimman, L.
(2009) ‘The other kind of coming out’: Transgender people and the coming out narrative genre. Gender and Language, 3(1), 53–80. [15.4]
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A.
(1998) Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. [13.4]