Chapter published in:
Writing History in Late Modern English: Explorations of the Coruña Corpus
Edited by Isabel Moskowich, Begoña Crespo, Luis Puente-Castelo and Leida Maria Monaco
[Not in series 225] 2019
► pp. 5881
References

References

Arnaud, Ren
(1998) The Development of the Progressive in 19th Century English: A Quantitative Survey. Language Variation and Change, 10, 123–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
(Ed.) (1988) Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas; Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, & Edward Finegan
(1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Coffin, Caroline
(1997) Constructing and Giving Value to the Past: An Investigation into Secondary School History. In Coffin, C. Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School (196–229). London, New York: Continuum Studies in Language and Education. Continuum.Google Scholar
Crespo, Begon˜a & Isabel Moskowich
(2015) A Corpus of History Texts (CHET) as Part of the Coruña Corpus Project. Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics (14–23). St. Petersburg, Russia.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Merja Kyto¨
(Eds.) (2010) Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Studies in English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik; Susanne Flach, Jukka Tyrkko¨, & Hans-Ju¨rgen Diller
(2015) Corpus of Late Modern English Texts (version 3.1). In Functional and Cognitive Linguistics: Grammar and Typology (FunC). KU Leuven. Accessed [16/11/2017] from https://​perswww​.kuleuven​.be​/u0044428​/clmet30​.htm
Degaetano-Ortlieb, Stefania & Elke Teich
(2016) Information-based Modeling of Diachronic Linguistic Change: From Typicality to Productivity. In Proceedings of the 10th SIGHUM Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, and Humanities at ACL (165–173). Berlin, Germany. Accessed [16/11/2017] from http://​aclanthology​.coli​.uni​-saarland​.de​/pdf​/W​/W16​/W16​-2121​.pdf. Crossref
(2017) Modeling Intra-textual Variation with Entropy and Surprisal: Topical vs. Stylistic Patterns. Proceedings of the Joint LaTeCH and CLfL Workshop at ACL (68–77). Vancouver, Canada. Accessed [16/11/2017] from http://​www​.aclweb​.org​/anthology​/W17​-2209
(2018) Using Relative Entropy for Detection and Analysis of Periods of Diachronic Linguistic Change. In Proceedings of the 2nd Joint SIGHUM Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities and Literature at COLING2018. Santa Fe, NM, USA. ACL. Accessed [08/07/2019] from https://​aclweb​.org​/anthology​/papers​/W​/W18​/W18​-4503/
(2019) Towards an Optimal Code for Communication: The Case of Scientific English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, open access, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Degaetano-Ortlieb, Stefania; Hannah Kermes, Ashraf Khamis, & Elke Teich
(2018) An Information-Theoretic Approach to Modeling Diachronic Change in Scientific English. In Carla Suhr, Terttu Nevalainen, & Irma Taavitsainen (Eds.), From Data to Evidence in English Language Research (258–281). Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dossena, Marina & Charles Jones
(Eds.) (2003) Insights into Late Modern English. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dossena, Marina & Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade
(Eds.) (2008) Studies in Late Modern English Correspondence: Methodology and Data. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Evert, Stefan & Andrew Hardie
(2011) Twenty-first Century Corpus Workbench: Updating a Query Architecture for the New Millennium. Accessed [16/11/2017] from http://​eprints​.lancs​.ac​.uk​/62721/
Go¨rlach, Manfred
(1998) An Annotated Bibliography of Nineteenth-Century Grammars of English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) English in Nineteenth-Century England: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Eighteenth-Century English. Heidelberg: Universita¨tsverlag C. Winter.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1988) On the Language of Physical Science. In Mohsen Ghadessy (Ed.), Registers of Written English: Situational Factors and Linguistic Features (162–177). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne
(Ed.) (2014) Late Modern English Syntax. Studies in English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kermes, Hannah; Stefania Degaetano-Ortlieb, Ashraf Khamis, Jo¨rg Knappen, & Elke Teich
(2016) The Royal Society Corpus: From Uncharted Data to Corpus. In Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) (1928–1931) Portorož, Slovenia.Google Scholar
Kopaczyk, Joanna
(Ed.) (2013) The Legal Language of Scottish Burghs: Standardization and Lexical Bundles. Oxford Studies in Language and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kullback, Solomon & Richard A. Leibler
(1951) On Information and Sufficiency. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22(1), 79–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kyto¨, Merja; Mats Ryde’n & Erik Smitterberg
(Eds.) (2006) Nineteenth-Century English: Stability and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Monaco, Leida Maria
(2016) Was Late Modern English Scientific Writing Impersonal? Comparing Philosophy and Life Sciences Texts from the Corun˜a Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21(4), 499–526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel
(2017) Pronouns as Stance Markers in the Corun˜a Corpus: An Analysis of the CETA, CEPhiT and CHET. In Francisco Alonso-Almeida (Ed.) Stancetaking in Late Modern English Scientific Writing. Evidence from the Coruña Corpus (73–91). Coleccio’n Scientia [Applied Linguistics]. Valencia: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad Polite’cnica de Valencia.Google Scholar
Osselton, Noel Edward
(1985) Spelling-Book Rules and the Capitalization of Nouns in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Historical & editorial studies in Medieval & Early Modern English for Johan Gerritsen, (49–61).Google Scholar
Pe’rez-Guerra, Javier; Dolores Gonza’lez-A’lvarez, Jorge L. Bueno Alonso, & Esperanza Rama-Mart’ınez
(Eds.) (2007) ‘Of Varying Language and Opposing Creed’ New Insights into Late Modern English. Bern Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Schmid, Helmut
(1995) Improvements in Part-of-Speech Tagging with an Application to German. In Proceedings of the ACL SIGDAT-Workshop, Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael & Isabel Barth
(2003) Using Recurrent Phrases as Text-type Discriminators: A Quantitative Method and some Findings. Functions in Language, 10(1), 61–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid
(Ed.) (2008) Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-writing in Eighteenth-century England. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) An Introduction to Late Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid & Wim van der Wurff
(Eds.) (2009) Current Issues in Late Modern English. Number 77 in Linguistic Insights. Studies in Language and Communication. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Werlich, Egon
(Ed.) (1975) Typologie der Texte. Wiebelsheim: Quelle and Meyer.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (1983) A Text Grammar of English. Wiebelsheim: Quelle and Meyer.Google Scholar