Cover not available
Part of
Writing History in Late Modern English: Explorations of the Coruña Corpus
Edited by Isabel Moskowich, Begoña Crespo, Luis Puente-Castelo and Leida Maria Monaco
[Not in series 225] 2019
► pp. 104–127

Chapter 6
Time and history

A preliminary approach to binomials in late Modern English Astronomy and History texts

| Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Binomials
    • 2.1Definition
    • 2.2Formal structure of binomials and word class of constituents
    • 2.3Function
    • 2.4Semantic structure
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Binomials in the Corpus of English Texts on Astronomy (CETA)
      • 4.1.1Word class of constituents and connectors
      • 4.1.2Semantic structure
    • 4.2Binomials in the Corpus of History English Texts (CHET)
      • 4.2.1Word class of constituents and connectors
      • 4.2.2Semantic structure
  • 5.Final remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 October 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.225.06nun
References
Bach, Ulrich
(2017) ‘I do make and ordayne this my last wyll and testament in manner and forme Folowing’: Functions of binomials in Early Modern English protestant wills”. In Joanna Kopaczyk & Hans Sauer (Eds.), Binomials in the history of English: Fixed and flexible (222–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K.
(1993) Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cantos, Pascual & Nila Vázquez
(2012) Subject specific vocabulary in astronomy texts: A diachronic survey of the Corpus of English Texts on Astronomy . In Isabel Moskowich & Begoña Crespo (Eds.), Astronomy ‘playne and simple’: The writing of science between 1700 and 1900 (123–153). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chapman, Don
(2017) Fixity and flexibility in Wulfstan’s binomials. In Joanna Kopaczyk & Hans Sauer (Eds.), Binomials in the history of English: Fixed and flexible (41–62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crespo, Begoña
(2012) Astronomical discourse in 18th and 19th century texts: A new-born model in the transmission of science. In Isabel Moskowich & Begoña Crespo (Eds.), Astronomy ‘playne and simple’: The writing of science between 1700 and 1900 (57–77). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Crespo, Begoña & Isabel Moskowich
(2010) CETA in the context of the Coruña Corpus . Literary and Linguistic Computing, 25(2), 153–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danet, Brenda
(1984) The magic flute: A prosodic analysis of binomial expressions in legal Hebrew. Text, 4, 143–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doty, Kathleen L. & Mark Wicklund
(2017) ‘Shee gave Selfe both Soule and body to the Devill’: The use of binomials in the Salem Witchcraft Trials. In Joanna Kopaczyk & Hans Sauer (Eds.), Binomials in the history of English: Fixed and flexible (241–260). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frade, Celina
(2005) Legal multinomials: Recovering possible meanings from vague tags. In Vijay K. Bhatia, Jan Engberg, Maurizio Gotti, & Dorothee Heller (Eds.), Vagueness in normative texts (133–156). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fulk, Robert D.
(2017) Pragmatic and stylistic functions of binomials in Old English. In Joanna Kopaczyk & Hans Sauer (Eds.), Binomials in the history of English: Fixed and flexible (27–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gorgis, Dinha T. & Yaser Al-Tamimi
(2015) Binomials in Iraqi and Jordanian Arabic. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 4(2), 135–151.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, Marita
(1984) The syntactic features of binomial expression in legal English. Text, 4/1–3, 123–141.Google Scholar
Iglesias-Rábade, Luis
(2007) Twin lexical collocations in legal Late Middle English. Studia Anglia Posnaniensia, 43, 17–47.Google Scholar
Klégr, Aleš
(1991) A note on binomials in English and Czech. Prague Studies in English, 19, 83–88.Google Scholar
Klégr, Aleš & Jan Čermák
(2008) Binomials in an historical English literary perspective: Shakespeare, Chaucer, Beowulf. In Martin Procházka & Jan Čermák (Eds.), Shakespeare between the Middle Ages and modernity: From translator’s art to academic discourse. A tribute to Professor Martin Hilský. MBE (40–62). Prague: Charles University, Faculty of Arts.Google Scholar
Koch, Barbara Johnstone
(1983) Arabic lexical couplets and the evolution of synonymy. General Linguistics, 23, 51–61.Google Scholar
Kopaczyk, Joanna
(2009) (Multi-word) units of meaning in 16th-century legal Scots. In Rod W. McConchie, Alpo Honkapohja & Jukka Tyrkkö (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Symposium on New Approaches in English Historical Lexis (88–95). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
(2012) Repetitive and therefore fixed? Lemmatic bundles and text-type standardization in 15th-century administrative Scots. In Hans Sauer & Gaby Waxenberger (Eds.), English Historical Linguistics 2008. Vol. 2: Words, texts and genres (189–209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopaczyk, Joanna & Hans Sauer
(Eds.) (2017) Binomials in the history of English: Fixed and flexible. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotake, Tadashi
(2017) Binomials or not? Double glosses in Farman’s gloss to the Rushworth Gospels . In Joanna Kopaczyk & Hans Sauer (Eds.), Binomials in the history of English: Fixed and flexible (82–97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krygier, Marcin
(2017) Binomial glosses in translation: The case of the Wycliffite Bible . In Joanna Kopaczyk & Hans Sauer (Eds.), Binomials in the history of English: Fixed and flexible (159–172). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kubaschewski, Elisabeth
(2017) Binomials in Caxton’s Ovid (Book I). In Joanna Kopaczyk & Hans Sauer (Eds.), Binomials in the history of English: Fixed and flexible (141–158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
(1984) Formulaicity, frame semantics, and pragmatics in German binomial expressions. Language, 60(4), 753–796. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehto, Anu
(2017) Binomials and multinomials in Early Modern English parliamentary acts. In Joanna Kopaczyk & Hans Sauer (Eds.), Binomials in the history of English: Fixed and flexible (261–278). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov
(1959) Studies in irreversible binomials. Lingua, 8, 113–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mmadike, Benjamin I.
(2014) A study of Igbo gender-based irreversible binomials. Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Open Science Repository.Google Scholar
Mollin, Sandra
(2014) The (Ir)rerversibility of English Binomials. Corpus, Constraints, Developments. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2017) Developments in the frequency of English binomials 1600–2000. In Joanna Kopaczyk & Hans Sauer (Eds.), Binomials in the History of English: Fixed and flexible (281–295). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel
(2016) Lexical richness in modern women writers: Evidence from the Corpus of History English Texts . Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 72, 111–128.Google Scholar
(2017) Genre and change in the Corpus of History English Texts . Nordic Journal of English Studies, 16(3), 84–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel & Begoña Crespo
(Eds.) (2012) Astronomy ‘playne and simple’: The writing of science between 1700 and 1900. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel, Inés Lareo, Gonzalo Camiña-Rioboo & Begoña Crespo
(Comp.) (2012) A Corpus of English Texts on Astronomy (CETA). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ogura, Michiko
(2017) Binomials, word pairs and variation as a feature of style in Old English poetry. In Joanna Kopaczyk & Hans Sauer (Eds.), Binomials in the history of English: Fixed and flexible (63–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko
(1993) Nominal repetitive constructions in Japanese: The ‘tautology’ controversy revisited. Journal of Pragmatics, 20, 433–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Sánchez, Ignacio
(2013) Frequency and specialization in Spanish binomials N y N . Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 95, 284–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rutkowska, Hanna
(2017) Binomials in several editions of the Kalender of Shepherdes, an Early Modern English almanac. In Joanna Kopaczyk & Hans Sauer (Eds.), Binomials in the history of English: Fixed and flexible (175–200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sauer, Hans
(2014) Twin-formulae and more in late Middle English: The Historye of the Patriarks, Caxton’s Ovid, Pecock’s Donet . In Michael Bilynsky (Ed.), Studies in Middle English: Words, Forms, Senses and Texts (25–46). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2017) Milton’s binomials and multinomials in Samson Agonistes . In Artur Kijak, Andrzej M. Łęcki & Jerzy Nykiel (Eds.), Current Developments in English Historical Linguistics. Studies in Honour of Rafal Molencki (275–303). Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.Google Scholar
(2018a) Binomials in the Middle English and Early Modern English versions of Bocaccio’s De mulieribus claris . In Margaret Connolly & Raluca Radulescu (Eds.), Editing and Interpretation of Middle English Texts. Essays in Honour of William Marx (83–105). Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018b) Flexible and formulaic: Binomials and multinomials in the Late Middle English The Wise Book of Philosophy and Astronomy . Acta Philologica, 50, 61–78.Google Scholar
Sauer, Hans & Birgit Schwan
(2017a) Heaven and earth, good and bad, answered and said: A survey of English binomials and multinomials (part I). Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 134 (1), 93–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017b) Heaven and earth, good and bad, answered and said: A survey of English binomials and multinomials (part II). Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 134 (2), 185–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, Ursula
(2017) On the linguistic and social development of a binomial: The example of to have and to hold . In Joanna Kopaczyk & Hans Sauer (Eds.), Binomials in the history of English: Fixed and flexible (322–343). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schenk, Ulrike
(2017) Binomials in Middle English poetry: Havelok, Ywain and Gawain, The Canterbury Tales . In Joanna Kopaczyk & Hans Sauer (Eds.), Binomials in the history of English: Fixed and flexible (125–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sprau, Melanie
(2017) Binomials and multinomials in Sir Thomas Elyot’s The Boke Named the Gouernour . In Joanna Kopaczyk & Hans Sauer (Eds.), Binomials in the history of English: Fixed and flexible (201–221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tyrkkö, Jukka
(2017) Binomials in English novels of the Late Modern Period: Fixedness, formulaicity and style. In Joanna Kopaczyk & Hans Sauer (Eds.), Binomials in the history of English: Fixed and flexible (296–231). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zagórska, Paulina
(2017) Lexical pairs and their function in the Eadwine Psalter manuscript. In Joanna Kopaczyk & Hans Sauer (Eds.), Binomials in the history of English: Fixed and flexible (98–121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar