Cover not available
Part of
Writing History in Late Modern English: Explorations of the Coruña Corpus
Edited by Isabel Moskowich, Begoña Crespo, Luis Puente-Castelo and Leida Maria Monaco
[Not in series 225] 2019
► pp. 168–183

Chapter 9
A corpus-based study of some certainty adverbs in the Corpus of History English Texts

| Universitat Jaume I
| Universidade de Vigo
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction and objectives
  • 2.Data and methodology
  • 3.Analysis
  • 4.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 October 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.225.09est
References
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco
(2012) Sentencial evidential adverbs and authorial stance in a corpus of English computing articles. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada. Monograph: conversing ways of applying Corpus Linguistics, 15–31.Google Scholar
Conrad, Susan & Douglas Biber
(2000) Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: authorial stance and the construction of discourse (56–73). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crespo, Begoña & Isabel Moskowich
(2015) A Corpus of history texts (CHET) as part of the Coruña Corpus Project. Proceedings of the international scientific conference Corpus linguistics-2015. St. Petersburgh: St. Petersburgh State University.Google Scholar
(2016) At close range: prefaces and other text types in the Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing. Revista de lenguas para fines específicos, 22/1, 213–237.Google Scholar
Downing, Angela
(2002) “ Surely you knew!” Surely as a marker of evidentiality and stance. Functions of Language, 8/2, 253–285.Google Scholar
Herrero, Concepción
(2007) “Las mujeres en la investigación científica”. Criterios, 8, 73–96.Google Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas
(2001) On Defining Text Types within Historical Linguistics: The Case of Petitions/Statutes. European Journal of English Studies, 5/2, 197–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel
(2012) “A smooth homogeneous globe” in CETA: Compiling late Modern Astronomy Texts in English. In Vázquez, N. (ed.), Creation and Use of Historical English Corpora in Spain. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.Google Scholar
(2016) Pronouns as stance markers in the Coruña Corpus: an Analysis of the CETA, CEPhiT and CHET . In Francisco Alonso (Ed.), Stancetaking in Late Modern English Scientific Writing. Evidence from the Coruña Corpus. Essays in Honour of Santiago González y Fernández-Corugedo (73–91). València: Universitat Politécnica de València.Google Scholar
(2017) Genre and change in the Corpus of History English Texts. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 16/3, 84–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) An Introduction to CHET, the Corpus of History English Texts. In Isabel Moskowich, Inés Lareo, Paula Lojo Sandino & Estefanía Sánchez Barreiro (Comps.). Corpus of History English Texts (CHET). Accessed [15/03/2019] from [URL]
Moskowich, Isabel & Begoña Crespo
(2014) Stance is present in scientific writing, indeed. Evidence from the Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing . Token: A Journal of English Linguistics, 3, 91–114.Google Scholar
(2016) Classifying communicative formats in CHET, CECheT and others. EPiC Series in Language and Linguistics, 1, 308–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel & Javier Parapar
(2008) Writing Science, compiling Science. The Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing. In María Jesús Lorenzo Modia (Ed.), Proceedings from the 31st AEDEAN Conference (531–544). A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph; Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, & Jan Svartvik
(1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Simon-Vanderbergen, Anne-Marie & Karin Aijmer
(2007) The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Esteve Ramos, María José
2021. Chapter 11. “This ingenious hypothe∫is hath a great appearance of truth”. In “All families and genera”, ► pp. 210 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.