Part of
Writing History in Late Modern English: Explorations of the Coruña Corpus
Edited by Isabel Moskowich, Begoña Crespo, Luis Puente-Castelo and Leida Maria Monaco
[Not in series 225] 2019
► pp. 168183
References
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco
(2012) Sentencial evidential adverbs and authorial stance in a corpus of English computing articles. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada. Monograph: conversing ways of applying Corpus Linguistics, 15–31.Google Scholar
Conrad, Susan & Douglas Biber
(2000) Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: authorial stance and the construction of discourse (56–73). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crespo, Begoña & Isabel Moskowich
(2015) A Corpus of history texts (CHET) as part of the Coruña Corpus Project. Proceedings of the international scientific conference Corpus linguistics-2015. St. Petersburgh: St. Petersburgh State University.Google Scholar
(2016) At close range: prefaces and other text types in the Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing. Revista de lenguas para fines específicos, 22/1, 213–237.Google Scholar
Downing, Angela
(2002) “ Surely you knew!” Surely as a marker of evidentiality and stance. Functions of Language, 8/2, 253–285.Google Scholar
Herrero, Concepción
(2007) “Las mujeres en la investigación científica”. Criterios, 8, 73–96.Google Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas
(2001) On Defining Text Types within Historical Linguistics: The Case of Petitions/Statutes. European Journal of English Studies, 5/2, 197–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel
(2012) “A smooth homogeneous globe” in CETA: Compiling late Modern Astronomy Texts in English. In Vázquez, N. (ed.), Creation and Use of Historical English Corpora in Spain. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.Google Scholar
(2016) Pronouns as stance markers in the Coruña Corpus: an Analysis of the CETA, CEPhiT and CHET . In Francisco Alonso (Ed.), Stancetaking in Late Modern English Scientific Writing. Evidence from the Coruña Corpus. Essays in Honour of Santiago González y Fernández-Corugedo (73–91). València: Universitat Politécnica de València.Google Scholar
(2017) Genre and change in the Corpus of History English Texts. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 16/3, 84–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) An Introduction to CHET, the Corpus of History English Texts. In Isabel Moskowich, Inés Lareo, Paula Lojo Sandino & Estefanía Sánchez Barreiro (Comps.). Corpus of History English Texts (CHET). Accessed [15/03/2019] from http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/2183​/21849
Moskowich, Isabel & Begoña Crespo
(2014) Stance is present in scientific writing, indeed. Evidence from the Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing . Token: A Journal of English Linguistics, 3, 91–114.Google Scholar
(2016) Classifying communicative formats in CHET, CECheT and others. EPiC Series in Language and Linguistics, 1, 308–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel & Javier Parapar
(2008) Writing Science, compiling Science. The Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing. In María Jesús Lorenzo Modia (Ed.), Proceedings from the 31st AEDEAN Conference (531–544). A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph; Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, & Jan Svartvik
(1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Simon-Vanderbergen, Anne-Marie & Karin Aijmer
(2007) The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Esteve Ramos, María José
2021. Chapter 11. “This ingenious hypothe∫is hath a great appearance of truth”. In “All families and genera”,  pp. 210 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.