Cover not available
Part of
Writing History in Late Modern English: Explorations of the Coruña Corpus
Edited by Isabel Moskowich, Begoña Crespo, Luis Puente-Castelo and Leida Maria Monaco
[Not in series 225] 2019
► pp. 235–257

Chapter 12
Do writers express the same attitude in historical genres?

A contrastive analysis of attitude devices in the Corpus of History English Texts

| Universitat Politècnica de València
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Attitude devices
  • 3.The Enlightenment
  • 4.Procedure
    • 4.1Material
    • 4.2Method
  • 5.Results and discussion
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 9 October 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.225.12car
References (28)
References
Abdi, Reza, Manoochehr T. Rizi & Mansoor Tavakoli. (2010). The cooperative principle in discourse communities and genres: A framework for the use of metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6): 1669–1679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abdollahzadeh, Esmaeel. (2011). Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 288–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andrus, Jennifer. (2009). The development of an artefactual language ideology: Utterance, event, and agency in the metadiscourse of the excited utterance exception to hearsay. Language & Communication, 29, 312–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco & María Luisa Carrió-Pastor. (2015). Sobre la categorización de seem en inglés y su traducción en español. Análisis de un corpus paralelo. Revista Signos, 48, 154–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blagojevic, Savka. (2009). Expressing attitudes in academic research articles written by English and Serbian authors. Facta Universitatis, 7–1, 63–73.Google Scholar
Bloch, Jean et al. (2005). History of ideas. Travel writing. History of the book. Enlightenment and antiquity. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation. University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Carrió-Pastor, María Luisa. (2014). Cross-cultural variation in the use of modal verbs in academic English. Sky, Journal of Linguistics, 27, 153–166.Google Scholar
. (2015). Identification of Rhetorical Moves in Business E-mails Written by Indian Speakers of English. In Erika Daricks (Ed.), Digital Business Discourse (226–242). London: Palgrave-MacMillan.Google Scholar
. (2016a). A contrastive study of the hedges used by English, Spanish and Chinese researchers in academic papers. In Francisco Alonso Almeida et al. (Eds.), Input a word, analyze the world: Selected approaches to Corpus Linguistics (477–492). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
. (2016b). A contrastive study of interactive metadiscourse in academic papers written in English and in Spanish. In Francisco Alonso Almeida, Laura Cruz García & Víctor González Ruiz (Eds.), Corpus-based studies on language varieties. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Collier Frick, Carole. (1999). The Enlightenment. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
Crespo, Begoña & Isabel Moskowich. (2010). CETA in the Context of the Coruña Corpus. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 25–2, 153–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Trine. (2004). Textual metadiscourse in research articles: a marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1807–1825. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edelstein, Ron (Ed.) (2010). The Super-Enlightenment. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation. University of Oxford. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engelsing, Ron. (1969). Die Perioden der Lesergeschichte in der Neuzeit. Das statische Ausmass und die soziokulturelle Bedeutung der Lektüre. Archiv für Geschichte des Buchwesens, 10.Google Scholar
Gillaerts, Paul & Freek Van de Velde. (2010). Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 128–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. (2005). Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7–2, 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Feng K. Jiang. (2016). Change of attitude? A Diachronic study of stance. Written Communication, 33–3, 251–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Feng K. & Ken Hyland. (2016). Nouns and academic interactions: A neglected feature of metadiscourse. Applied Linguistics, published online: 1–25. DOI logo. [Accessed 12/12/2016]Google Scholar
Koutsantoni, Dimitra. (2004). Attitude, certainty and allusions to common knowledge in scientific research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3, 163–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mur Dueñas, Pilar. (2010). Attitude markers in business management research articles: a cross-cultural corpus-driven approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 50–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). An intercultural analysis of metadiscourse features in research articles written in English and in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3068–3079. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pocock, John G. A. (1996). Classical and Civil History: The Transformation of Humanism. Cromohs, 1, 1–34. Accessed [10/10/2017] at [URL]
Porter, Michael. (2003). The Economic Performance of Regions. Regional Studies, 37–6, 549–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, Elena. (2017). Towards a typology of discourse-based approaches to language attitudes. Language & Communication, 56, 82–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John & Amy Burke. (2003). “It’s really fascinating work”: differences in the evaluative adjectives across academic registers. In Pepi Leistyna & Charles F. Meyer (Eds.), Corpus Analysis, Language Structure and Language Use (1–18). New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Swinehart, Karl F. (2012). Metadiscursive regime and register formation on Aymara radio. Language & Communication, 32, 102–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics, 22–1, 58–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Carrió-Pastor, María Luisa
2024. The Functions of Attitude Markers in Spanish and English Academic Papers on Linguistics and Their Collocations. In Constructional and Cognitive Explorations of Contrastive Linguistics, ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Carrió-Pastor, María Luisa & Ana Albalat-Mascarell
2023. The use of boosters and evidentials in British campaign debates on the Brexit referendum. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Albalat-Mascarell, Ana & María Luisa Carrió-Pastor
2022. Marcadores de implicación en los discursos de campaña para las elecciones generales de 2016 en España. Spanish in Context 19:3 ► pp. 537 ff. DOI logo
Carrió-Pastor, María Luisa, J. Alberto Conejero Casares, Antonio Pérez Gómez & Pedro A. Solares-Hernández
2021. El respeto al poder en Twitter en la crisis española por el COVID-19. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 86 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.