Miscellaneous published in:
Historical Linguistics: A cognitive grammar introduction
Margaret E. Winters
[Not in series 227] 2020
► pp. 231236
Allen, Cynthia
1980Diachronic English Syntax. New York and London: Garland.Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo
1989Historical and Comparative Linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 6), 2nd edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Analogy: The Warp and Woof of Cognition. In B. Joseph and R. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 425–440. Maiden (MA), Oxford (UK): Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arlotto, Anthony
1972Introduction to Historical Linguistics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Bomhard, Allan R.
2008Reconstructing Proto-Nostratic: Comparative Phonology, Morphology, and Vocabulary, 2 vols. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2002Word Frequency and Context of Use in the Lexical Diffusion of Phonetically Conditioned Sound Change. Language Variation and Change 14: 261–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Mechanisms of Change in Grammaticalization: The Role of Frequency. In B. Joseph and R. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 602–623. Maiden (MA), Oxford (UK): Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle
1990Syntactic Reconstruction and Finno-Ugric. In H. Andersen and K. Koerner (eds.), Historical Linguistics 1987: Papers from the Eighth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 51–94. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988Review of Greenberg (1987). Language 64: 591–615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Review of Kari and Potter. International Journal of American Linguistics 77: 445–451. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Language Isolates and their History, or, What’s Weird, Anyway? Berkeley Linguistic Society 36:16–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chrisomalis, Stephen
2010Numerical Notation. A Comparative History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David
2000Language Death. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clackson, James
2017The Comparative Method and Comparative Reconstruction. In A. Ledgeway and I. Roberts (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Marcelle
2018A Native Origin for Present-Day English they, their, them . Diachronica 35: 165–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara
(ed.) 2017The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
2000Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell,Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph Embley and Jan Terje Faarlund
2014English: The Language of the Vikings. Olomouc: Palacký University.Google Scholar
Fertig, David
2013Analogy and Morphological Change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fortson, Benjamin W., IV
2003An Approach to Semantic Change. In Joseph and Janda (eds.), 648–666.Google Scholar
Foulet, Alfred and Mary Blakely Spear
1979On Editing Old French Texts. Lawrence, KS: Regents Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Fox, Anthony
1995Linguistic Reconstruction: An Introduction to Theory and Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2005The Structure of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gamkrelidze, Thomas and Ivanov, Vjaceslav
1995Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans: A Reconstruction and Historical Analysis of a Proto-Language and a Proto-Culture, 2 Vols. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van
2006A History of the English Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1971Historical Syntax and Synchronic Morphology: An Archaeologist’s Field Trip. Chicago Linguistics Society 7: 394–415.Google Scholar
2018On Understanding Grammar, 2nd edn. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, Jane
1990Through a Window. Boston: Houghton MifflinGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1963Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In J. H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language (2nd edition, 1966, 73–113), 58–90. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1987Language in the Americas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. et al.
1987Review and Discussion of Greenberg (1987). Current Anthropology 8: 647–667.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. and Lyle Campbell
1995Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 74). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce
2009Introductory Phonology. Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics. Malden, MA; Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heyvaert, Liesbet and Hubert Cuyckens
2010Finite and Gerundive Complementation in Modern and Present-day English: Semantics, Variation and Change. In M. E. Winters, H. Tissari, and K. Allan (eds.), Historical Cognitive Linguistics, 132–159. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, Mikhl
Hopper, Paul
1973Glottalized and Murmured Occlusives in Indo-European. Glotta 7: 141–166.Google Scholar
Hurford, James
2003The Language Mosaic and its Evolution. In M. H. Christiansen and S. Kirby (eds.), Language Evolution: The States of the Art, 38–57. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Izzo, Herbert
1972The Layer-Cake Model in Historical Linguistics. General Linguistics 12: 159–168.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Neil
2005Yiddish: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. Florian and Kodi Weatherholtz
2016What the Heck is Salience? How Predictive Language Processing Contributes to Sociolinguistic Perception. Frontiers in Psychology 7: 1115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1917Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: Høst.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian and Richard Janda
2003The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. New York: J. Wiley and Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kari, James and Ben A. Potter
(eds.) 2010The Dene-Yeniseian Connection. Anthropological Papers of the University of Alaska, New Series, Vol. 5 (1–2). Fairbanks: Department of Anthropology, University of Alaska.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi
1994On Language Change. The Invisible Hand in Language, translated by B. Nerlich. London and New York: Routledge; first published 1990, Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Kuryɬowicz, Jerzy
1945La nature des procès dits “analogiques”. Acta Linguistica 5: 121–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1981Resolving the Neogrammarian controversy. Language 57: 267–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Review of P. Eckert. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice in Language in Society 31: 277–284.Google Scholar
2007Transmission and Diffusion. Language 83: 344–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Principles of Language Change: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter
2005A Course in Phonetics. Orlando: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter and Ian Maddieson
1996The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. I Theoretical Prerequisites. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2008Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam and Ian Roberts
(eds.) 2017The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2015Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 3rd edn. Berlin: Language Science Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred
1974Proto-Indo-European Syntax. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Erez, Jean-Baptiste Michel, Joe Jackson, Tina Tang, and Martin A. Nowak
2007Quantifying the Evolutionary Dynamics of Language. Nature 449 (7163): 713–716. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Philip
1975On the Origins of Language. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1979Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics, Vol. 1 and 2. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mańczak, Witold
1958Tendences générales des changements analogiques. Lingua 7: 298–325; 387–420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, André
1984De la synchronie dynamique à la diachronie. Diachronica 1: 53–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, Geoffrey S.
1989Preliminaries to a Theory of Phonological Substance: The Substance of Sonority. In R. Corrigan, M. Noonan, and F. Eckman (eds.), Linguistic Categorization (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 61), 55–68. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Steps towards a Cognitive Phonology. In Bernhard Hurch and Richard Rhodes (eds.), Natural Phonology: The State of the Art, 107–120. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Phonology. In Dirk Geeraerts, and Hubert Cuykens (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistic, 611–631. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2008Phonology: A Cognitive Grammar Introduction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel
2009Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J.
2006Phonetics and Historical Phonology. In Joseph and Janda (eds.), 669–686.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary
Payne, Laura
2006 From Bookworms to Trust Slugs: The Patterns and Productivity of “Animal for X” Metaphoric Compounds . Masters Thesis, Wayne State University.
Premack, David and Ann Premack
1983The Mind of an Ape. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren
2011Dene-Yeniseian. Diachronica 28: 255–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Henry
2001The Sounds of Language: An Introduction to Phonetics. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1921Language. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1879Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les langues indo-européennes. Leipzig: Vieweg.Google Scholar
1916A Course in General Linguistics. Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, in collaboration with Albert Riedlinger. Translated with an introduction and notes by Wade Baskin. New York, Toronto, London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1990The languages of Japan (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Sturtevant, Edgar
1947An Introduction to Linguistic Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990From Etymology to Pragmatics – Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tai, James
1985Temporal Sequence and Chinese Word Order. In J. Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax, 49–72. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trask, Robert L.
1996Historical Linguistics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1982From Propositional to Textual and Expressive Meanings; Some Semantic-Pragmatic Aspects of Grammaticalization. In W. Lehmann and Y. Malkiel (eds.), Perspectives on Historical Linguistics, 245–271. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Paul Hopper
2003Grammaticalization (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics), 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Urban, Mattias
2015Lexical Semantic Change and Semantic Reconstruction. In C. Bowern and B. Evans (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 374–392. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walkden, George
2014Syntactic Reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wedel, Andrew, Abby Kaplan, and Scott Jackson
2013High Functional Load Inhibits Phonological Contrast Loss: A Corpus Study. Cognition 28: 179–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, and Marvin I. Herzog
1968Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change. In L. P. Lehmann and Y. Malkiel (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics, 97–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Winters, Margaret E.
1984Steps to the Romance Passive Inferable from the Itinerarium Egeriae . Romance Philology 37: 445–54.Google Scholar
1987Innovations in French Negation: A Cognitive Grammar Account. Diachronica 4: 27–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990Cognitive Grammar and Kuryɬowicz’s Laws of Analogy. In H. Andersenand K. Koerner (eds.), Historical Linguistics 1987, 543–551. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995The Nature of the So-Called Analogical Processes. Translated into English and with an Introduction. Diachronica 12 (1): 113–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997On Reconstructing the Middle Ground. Linguistica Atlantica 18/19: 141–153.Google Scholar
Winters, Margaret E. and Geoffrey S. Nathan
1992First He Called Her a Philologist and then She Insulted Him. In D. Brentari et al., (eds.), The Joy of Grammar: A Festschrift in Honor of James D. McCawley, 351–367. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich
1989Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 9). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Zuckermann, Ghil’ad
2006A New Vision for ‘Israeli Hebrew’: Theoretical and Practical Implications of Analysing Israel’s Main Language as a Semi-Engineered Semito-European Hybrid Language. Journal of Modern Jewish Studies 5 (1): 57–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
homonyms by coincidence.
Dante’s De vulgari eloquentia)
John McWhorter on aks ).
Copic ms. find.