Cover not available
Part of
Historical Linguistics: A cognitive grammar introduction
Margaret E. Winters
[Not in series 227] 2020
► pp. 231–236

References

Allen, Cynthia. 1980. Diachronic English Syntax. New York and London: Garland.Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo. 1989. Historical and Comparative Linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 6), 2nd edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Analogy: The Warp and Woof of Cognition. In B. Joseph and R. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 425–440. Maiden (MA), Oxford (UK): Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arlotto, Anthony. 1972. Introduction to Historical Linguistics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Bomhard, Allan R. 2008. Reconstructing Proto-Nostratic: Comparative Phonology, Morphology, and Vocabulary, 2 vols. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2002. Word Frequency and Context of Use in the Lexical Diffusion of Phonetically Conditioned Sound Change. Language Variation and Change 14: 261–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Mechanisms of Change in Grammaticalization: The Role of Frequency. In B. Joseph and R. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 602–623. Maiden (MA), Oxford (UK): Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1990. Syntactic Reconstruction and Finno-Ugric. In H. Andersen and K. Koerner (eds.), Historical Linguistics 1987: Papers from the Eighth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 51–94. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1988. Review of Greenberg (1987). Language 64: 591–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Review of Kari and Potter. International Journal of American Linguistics 77: 445–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Language Isolates and their History, or, What’s Weird, Anyway? Berkeley Linguistic Society 36:16–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chrisomalis, Stephen. 2010. Numerical Notation. A Comparative History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David. 2000. Language Death. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clackson, James. 2017. The Comparative Method and Comparative Reconstruction. In A. Ledgeway and I. Roberts (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cole, Marcelle. 2018. A Native Origin for Present-Day English they, their, them . Diachronica 35: 165–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara (ed.). 2017. The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell,Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph Embley and Jan Terje Faarlund. 2014. English: The Language of the Vikings. Olomouc: Palacký University.Google Scholar
Fertig, David. 2013. Analogy and Morphological Change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fortson, Benjamin W., IV. 2003. An Approach to Semantic Change. In Joseph and Janda (eds.), 648–666.Google Scholar
Foulet, Alfred and Mary Blakely Spear. 1979. On Editing Old French Texts. Lawrence, KS: Regents Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Fox, Anthony. 1995. Linguistic Reconstruction: An Introduction to Theory and Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. The Structure of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gamkrelidze, Thomas and Ivanov, Vjaceslav. 1995. Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans: A Reconstruction and Historical Analysis of a Proto-Language and a Proto-Culture, 2 Vols. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van. 2006. A History of the English Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy.1971. Historical Syntax and Synchronic Morphology: An Archaeologist’s Field Trip. Chicago Linguistics Society 7: 394–415.Google Scholar
. 2018. On Understanding Grammar, 2nd edn. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodall, Jane. 1990. Through a Window. Boston: Houghton MifflinGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In J. H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language (2nd edition, 1966, 73–113), 58–90. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1987. Language in the Americas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. et al. 1987. Review and Discussion of Greenberg (1987). Current Anthropology 8: 647–667.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. and Lyle Campbell 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 74). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 2009. Introductory Phonology. Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics. Malden, MA; Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heyvaert, Liesbet and Hubert Cuyckens. 2010. Finite and Gerundive Complementation in Modern and Present-day English: Semantics, Variation and Change. In M. E. Winters, H. Tissari, and K. Allan (eds.), Historical Cognitive Linguistics, 132–159. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herzog, Mikhl. 1998. Cross-Linguistic Homonyms. [URL].
Hopper, Paul. 1973. Glottalized and Murmured Occlusives in Indo-European. Glotta 7: 141–166.Google Scholar
Hurford, James. 2003. The Language Mosaic and its Evolution. In M. H. Christiansen and S. Kirby (eds.), Language Evolution: The States of the Art, 38–57. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izzo, Herbert. 1972. The Layer-Cake Model in Historical Linguistics. General Linguistics 12: 159–168.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Neil. 2005. Yiddish: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. Florian and Kodi Weatherholtz. 2016. What the Heck is Salience? How Predictive Language Processing Contributes to Sociolinguistic Perception. Frontiers in Psychology 7: 1115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto 1917. Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: Høst.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian and Richard Janda. 2003. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. New York: J. Wiley and Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kari, James and Ben A. Potter (eds.). 2010. The Dene-Yeniseian Connection. Anthropological Papers of the University of Alaska, New Series, Vol. 5 (1–2). Fairbanks: Department of Anthropology, University of Alaska.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1994. On Language Change. The Invisible Hand in Language, translated by B. Nerlich. London and New York: Routledge; first published 1990, Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Kuryɬowicz, Jerzy. 1945. La nature des procès dits “analogiques”. Acta Linguistica 5: 121–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1981. Resolving the Neogrammarian controversy. Language 57: 267–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Review of P. Eckert. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice in Language in Society 31: 277–284.Google Scholar
. 2007. Transmission and Diffusion. Language 83: 344–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Principles of Language Change: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 2005. A Course in Phonetics. Orlando: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter and Ian Maddieson. 1996. The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. I Theoretical Prerequisites. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2008. Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam and Ian Roberts (eds.). 2017. The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2015. Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 3rd edn. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred. 1974. Proto-Indo-European Syntax. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Erez, Jean-Baptiste Michel, Joe Jackson, Tina Tang, and Martin A. Nowak. 2007. Quantifying the Evolutionary Dynamics of Language. Nature 449 (7163): 713–716. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Philip. 1975. On the Origins of Language. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, Vol. 1 and 2. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mańczak, Witold. 1958. Tendences générales des changements analogiques. Lingua 7: 298–325; 387–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinet, André. 1984. De la synchronie dynamique à la diachronie. Diachronica 1: 53–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nathan, Geoffrey S. 1989. Preliminaries to a Theory of Phonological Substance: The Substance of Sonority. In R. Corrigan, M. Noonan, and F. Eckman (eds.), Linguistic Categorization (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 61), 55–68. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996. Steps towards a Cognitive Phonology. In Bernhard Hurch and Richard Rhodes (eds.), Natural Phonology: The State of the Art, 107–120. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Phonology. In Dirk Geeraerts, and Hubert Cuykens (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistic, 611–631. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2008. Phonology: A Cognitive Grammar Introduction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J. 2006. Phonetics and Historical Phonology. In Joseph and Janda (eds.), 669–686.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary. [URL].
Payne, Laura. 2006. From Bookworms to Trust Slugs: The Patterns and Productivity of “Animal for X” Metaphoric Compounds . Masters Thesis, Wayne State University.
Premack, David and Ann Premack. 1983. The Mind of an Ape. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 2011. Dene-Yeniseian. Diachronica 28: 255–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Henry. 2001. The Sounds of Language: An Introduction to Phonetics. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1879. Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les langues indo-européennes. Leipzig: Vieweg.Google Scholar
. 1916. A Course in General Linguistics. Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, in collaboration with Albert Riedlinger. Translated with an introduction and notes by Wade Baskin. New York, Toronto, London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1990. The languages of Japan (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Sturtevant, Edgar. 1947. An Introduction to Linguistic Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics – Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tai, James. 1985. Temporal Sequence and Chinese Word Order. In J. Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax, 49–72. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trask, Robert L.. 1996. Historical Linguistics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1982. From Propositional to Textual and Expressive Meanings; Some Semantic-Pragmatic Aspects of Grammaticalization. In W. Lehmann and Y. Malkiel (eds.), Perspectives on Historical Linguistics, 245–271. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Paul Hopper. 2003. Grammaticalization (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics), 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Urban, Mattias. 2015. Lexical Semantic Change and Semantic Reconstruction. In C. Bowern and B. Evans (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 374–392. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walkden, George. 2014. Syntactic Reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wedel, Andrew, Abby Kaplan, and Scott Jackson. 2013. High Functional Load Inhibits Phonological Contrast Loss: A Corpus Study. Cognition 28: 179–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, and Marvin I. Herzog. 1968. Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change. In L. P. Lehmann and Y. Malkiel (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics, 97–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Winters, Margaret E. 1984. Steps to the Romance Passive Inferable from the Itinerarium Egeriae . Romance Philology 37: 445–54.Google Scholar
1987. Innovations in French Negation: A Cognitive Grammar Account. Diachronica 4: 27–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990. Cognitive Grammar and Kuryɬowicz’s Laws of Analogy. In H. Andersenand K. Koerner (eds.), Historical Linguistics 1987, 543–551. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997. On Reconstructing the Middle Ground. Linguistica Atlantica 18/19: 141–153.Google Scholar
Winters, Margaret E. and Geoffrey S. Nathan. 1992. First He Called Her a Philologist and then She Insulted Him. In D. Brentari et al., (eds.), The Joy of Grammar: A Festschrift in Honor of James D. McCawley, 351–367. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich. 1989. Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 9). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Zuckermann, Ghil’ad. 2006. A New Vision for ‘Israeli Hebrew’: Theoretical and Practical Implications of Analysing Israel’s Main Language as a Semi-Engineered Semito-European Hybrid Language. Journal of Modern Jewish Studies 5 (1): 57–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_cognate=true, homonyms by coincidence.
https://www.danteonline.it/english/opere.asp?idope=3&idlang=UK (Dante’s De vulgari eloquentia)
http://articles.latimes.com/2014/jan/19/opinion/la-oe-mcwhorter-black-speech-ax-20140119 (John McWhorter on aks ).
https://www.librarything.com/topic/25759, Copic ms. find.
Rate of Language Change. [URL].
Phylogenetics. [URL].
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4971435/
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00411/