A. Corpus-based studies of present-day English: general
Aarts, J. & W. Meijs (eds) (1984). Corpus Linguistics: Recent Developments in the Use of Computer Corpora in
English Language Research, Amsterdam: Rodopi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aarts, J. & W. Meijs (eds) (1986). Corpus Linguistics II. New Studies in the Analysis and Exploitation of Computer
Corpora, Amsterdam: Rodopi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aarts, J. & W. Meijs. (eds) (1990). Theory and Practice in Corpus Linguistics, Amsterdam: Rodopi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aarts, J., P. de Haan, & N. Oostdijk (eds) (1993). English Language Corpora: Design, Analysis and Exploitation, Amsterdam: Rodopi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aijmer, K. & B. Altenberg (eds) (1991). English Corpus Linguistics. Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik, London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Allwood, J. & M. Ljung (eds) (1980). ALVAR: A Linguistically Varied Assortment of Readings. Studies Presented to
Alvar Ellegård on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, Stockholm Papers in English Language and Literature 1, Department of English, University of
Stockholm.
Altenberg, B. (1996). ICAME Bibliography 3 (1990–4). Available on line from ICAME Bergen: Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aston, G. & L. Burnard. (1998). The BNC Handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barnbrook, G. (1996). Language and Computers. A Practical Introduction to the Computer Analysis of
Language, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D. (1993). ‘An analytical framework for register studies’, in Biber & Finegan (eds) 1993: 31–56.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D. (1993). ‘Representativeness in corpus design’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 8: 1–15. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D., S. Conrad & R. Reppen. (1994). ‘Corpus-based approaches to language issues in applied
linguistics’, Applied Linguistics 15: 169–189. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D., S. Conrad & R. Reppen. (1998). Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D. & E. Finegan. (1991). ‘On the exploration of computerized corpora in variation
studies’, in Aijmer & Altenberg (eds) 1991: 204–220.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Black, E., R. Garside & G. Leech (eds) (1993). Statistically-driven Computer Grammars of English. The IBM/Lancaster
Approach, Amsterdam: Rodopi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, W. L. (1992). ‘The importance of corpus linguistics to understanding the nature of
language’, in Svartvik (ed) 1992: 79–97. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. (1992). ‘Corpus linguistics’ or ‘Computer-aided armchair
linguistics’, in Svartvik (ed) 1992: 35–60. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Francis, W. N. (1979). ‘Problems of assembling and computerizing large corpora’, in Bergenholtz & Schaeder (eds) 1979: 110–123.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Francis, W. N. (1980). ‘A tagged corpus: problems and prospects’, in Greenbaum, Leech & Svartvik (eds) 1980: 192–209, London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Francis, W. N. & H. Kucera. (1982). Frequency Analysis of English Usage. Lexicon and Grammar, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fries, U., G. Tottie & P. Schneider. (eds) (1994). Creating and Using English Language Corpora: Papers from the 14th International
Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, Zurich 1993, Amsterdam: Rodopi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garside, R., G. Leech & T. McEnery. (1997). Corpus Annotation. Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora, London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garside, R., G. Leech & G. Sampson (eds) (1987). The Computational Analysis of English, London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Granger, S. (ed) (1998). Learner English on Computer, London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greenbaum, S. (ed) (1996). Comparing English Worldwide: the International Corpus of English, Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greenbaum, S., G. Leech & J. Svartvik (eds) (1980). Studies in English Linguistics for Randolph Quirk, London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hofland, K. & S. Johansson. (1982). Word Frequencies in British and American English, Bergen: Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities / London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johansson, S. (ed) (1982). Computer Corpora in English Language Research, Bergen: Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johansson, S., in collaboration with E. Atwell, R. Garside & G. Leech. (1986). The Tagged LOB Corpus. Users’ Manual, Bergen: Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johansson, S. & K. Hofland. (1989). Frequency Analysis of English Vocabulary and Grammar, vols 1–2, Oxford: Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johansson, S. & A.-B. Stenström (eds) (1991). English Computer Corpora: Selected Papers and Research Guide, Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kennedy, G. (1998). An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics, London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klegraf, J. & Nehls, D. (eds) (1988). Essays on the English Language and Applied Linguistics on the Occasion of
Gerhard Nickel’s 60th Birthday, Heidelberg: Julius Groos. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kucera, H. & W. N. Francis. (1967). Computational Analysis of Present-day American English, Providence, R.I.: Brown University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, G. & A. Beale. (1984). ‘Computers in English language research’, Language Teaching and Linguistics: Abstracts 17: 216–229. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, G., G. Myers & J. Thomas (eds) (1995). Spoken English on Computer: Transcription, Mark-up and Application, London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McEnery, T. & A. Wilson. (1996). Corpus Linguistics, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sampson, G. (1995). English for the Computer: The SUSANNE Corpus and Analytic Scheme, Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sinclair, J. McH. (1982). ‘Reflections on computer corpora in English language
research’, in Johansson (ed) 1982: 1–6.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and Corpus Analysis, Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Svartvik, J. (ed) (1992). Directions in Corpus Linguistics, Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm, 4–8 August 1991, Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Svartvik, J. (ed) (1990). The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research, Lund Studies in English 82, Lund: Lund University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Svartvik, J. & R. Quirk (eds) (1980). A Corpus of English Conversation, Lund Studies in English 56, Lund: Lund University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thomas, J. & M. Short (eds) (1996). Using Corpora for Language Research. Studies in the Honour of Geoffrey
Leech, London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tottie, G. & I. Bäcklund (eds) (1986). English in Speech and Writing: A Symposium, Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 60, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wichmann, A., S. Fligelstone, T. McEnery & G. Knowles (eds) (1997). Teaching and Language Corpora, London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
B. Corpus-informed grammars of present-day English
Greenbaum, S. (1996). The Oxford English Grammar, Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greenbaum, S. & R. Quirk. (1990). A Student’s Grammar of the English Language, London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, G. & J. Svartvik. (1994). A Communicative Grammar of English, London: Longman (2nd edn).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik. (1972). A Grammar of Contemporary English, London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sinclair, J. (ed-in-chief) (1990). Collins COBUILD English Grammar, London & Glasgow: HarperCollins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
C. Corpus-informed studies of specific areas of present-day English grammar
Aarts, B. (1992). Small Clauses in English: the Nonverbal Types, Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aarts, B. & C. F. Meyer (eds) (1995). The Verb in Contemporary English. Theory and Description, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aarts, F. (1971). ‘On the distribution of noun-phrase types in English clause
structure’, Lingua 26: 281–293. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aarts, F. (1993). ‘
Who, whom, that and Ø in two corpora of spoken
English’, English Today 9: 19–21. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aarts, F. (1994). ‘Imperative sentences in a corpus of English conversation’, Leuvense Bijdragen (Leuven Contributions in Linguistics and Philology) 83: 145–155.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aarts, J. & F. Aarts (eds) (1995). ‘
Find and want. A corpus-based case study in verb
complementation’, in Aarts & Meyer 1995: 159–182.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Abberton, E. (1977). ‘Nominal group premodification structures’, in Bald & Ilson (eds) 1977: 29–72.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aijmer, K. (1984). ‘
Go to and will in spoken English’, in Ringbom & Rissanen (eds) 1984: 141–157.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aijmer, K. (1984). ‘
Sort of and kind of in English
conversation’, Studia Linguistica 38: 118–128. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aijmer, K. (1985). ‘What happens at the end of our utterances? The use of utterance-final
tags introduced by and and or
’, in Papers from the 8th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, O. Togeby (ed), 117–127, Institut for Nordisk Filologi, University of Copenhagen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aijmer, K. (1986). ‘Discourse variation and hedging’, in Aarts & Meijs (eds) 1986: 1–18.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aijmer, K. (1986a). ‘Why is actually so frequent in spoken
English?’ in Tottie & Bäcklund (eds) 1986: 119–129.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aijmer, K. (1986b). ‘Speaking with many voices: direct and indirect speech in English
conversation’, in Papers from the 9th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Ö. Dahl (ed), 1–14, Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aijmer, K. (1988). ‘“Now may we have a word on this”: The use of now as a
discourse particle’, in Kytö et al. (eds) 1988: 15–34.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aijmer, K. (1989). ‘Themes and tails: The discourse functions of dislocated
elements’, Nordic Journal of Linguistics 12: 137–154. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aijmer, K. (1996). Conversational Routines in English: Convention and Creativity, London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Algeo, J. (1988). ‘British and American grammatical differences’, International Journal of Lexicography 1: 1–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Altenberg, B. (1984). ‘Causal linking in spoken and written English’, Studia Linguistica 38: 20–69. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Altenberg, B. (1986). ‘Contrastive linking in spoken and written English’, in Tottie & Bäcklund (eds) 1986: 13–40.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Altenberg, B. (1987). ‘Causal ordering strategies in English conversation’, in Grammar in the Construction of Texts, J. Monaghan (ed), 50–64, London: Frances Pinter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Altenberg, B. (1993). ‘Recurrent verb-complement constructions in the London-Lund
corpus’, in Aarts et al. (eds) 1993: 227–245.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Altenberg, B. & M. Eeg-Olofsson. (1990). ‘Phraseology in spoken English’, in Aarts & Meijs (eds) 1990: 126.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andersson, E. (1985). On Verb Complementation in Written English, Lund Studies in English 71, Lund: Gleerup/Liber.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Axelsson, M. W. (1998). Contraction in British Newspapers in the Late 20th Century, Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 102, Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bache, C. (1985). Verbal Aspect. A General Theory and Its Application to Present-day British
English, Odense: Odense University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Backlund, I. (1984). Conjunction-headed Abbreviated Clauses in English. Stadia Anglistica Upsalienia 50, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Backlund, I. (1986). ‘“Beat until stiff.” Conjunction-headed abbreviated clauses in spoken and
written English’, in Tottie & Bäcklund (eds) 1986: 41–55.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bäcklund, I. (1988). ‘Grounds for prominence. On hierarchies and grounding in English
expository text’, Studia Neophilologica 60: 37–61. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bäcklund, I. (1988). ‘To begin with, this is the problem, for example. On some reader-oriented
structural markers in English expository text’, Studia Linguis-tica 42: 60–68. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bäcklund, I. (1989). ‘Cues to the audience. On some structural markers in English
monologue’, in Odenstedt & Persson (eds) 1989: 29–39.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bald, W.-D. (1972). Studien zu den Kopulativen Verben des Englischen, Munich: Hueber.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bald, W. -D. and R. Ilson (eds) (1977). Studies in English Usage: The resources of a present-day English Corpus for
Linguistic Analysis, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bald, W.-D. (1987). ‘Reduced structures in English grammar’, in W. Lörscher & R. Schulze (eds) Perspectives on Language in Performance. Studies in Linguistics, Literary
Criticism, and Language Teaching and Learning. To Honour Werner Hüllen, Tübingen: G. Narr. 69–87.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bald, W.-D. (1988a). ‘A note on the textual distribution of one
’, in Klegraf & Nehls (eds) 1988: 156–160.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bald, W.-D. (1988b). Kernprobleme der Englischen Grammatik. Sprachliche Fakten and Ihre
Vermitt-lung, Berlin & Munich: Langenscheidt-Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bald, W.-D. (1988c). ‘
If-Sätze im Englischen’, in Bald 1988b: 38–50.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barkema, H. (1993). ‘Idiomaticity in English NPs’, in Aarts et al. (eds) 1993: 257–278.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berglund, Y. (1997). ‘Future in present-day English: corpus-based evidence on the rivalry of
expressions’, ICAME Journal 21: 7–19.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D. (1985). ‘Investigating macroscopic textual variation through
multi-feature/multi-dimensional analyses’, Linguistics 23: 155–178. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D. (1986). ‘On the investigation of spokenl written differences’, Studia Linguistica 40: 1–21. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D. (1986). ‘Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: resolving the
contradictory findings’, Language 62: 384–414. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D. (1988). ‘A textual comparison of British and American writing’, American Speech 62: 99–119. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across Speech and Writing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D. (1989). ‘A typology of English texts’, Linguistics 27: 3–43. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D. (1992a). ‘On the complexity of discourse complexity: a multidimensional
analysis’, Discourse Processes 15: 133–163. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D. (1992b). ‘Using computer-based text corpora to analyze the referential strategies
of spoken and written texts’, in Svartvik (ed.) 1992: 213–252. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D. & E. Finegan. (1988). ‘Adverbial stance types in English’, Discourse Processes 11: 1–34. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D. & E. Finegan. (1989). ‘Styles of stance in English. Lexical and grammatical marking of
evidentiality and affect’, Text 9: 93–124. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Black, M. (1977). ‘An investigation into factors influencing the choice between the syllabic
and contracted form of is
’, in Bald & Ilson (eds) 1977: 171–189.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Breivik, L. E. (1981). ‘On the interpretation of existential there’, Language 57: 1–25. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Breivik, L. E. (1990 [1983]). Existential ‘there’. A Synchronic and Diachronic Study. Studia Anglistica Norvegica 2, Oslo: Novus.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bublitz, W. (1989). ‘Ausdrücke des Kenntnisnehmens (Hörersignale) oder des Stellungsnehmens
(Rede-beitrage): yes und verwandte Formen’, Folia Linguistica 23: 67–104. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Buysschaert, B. (1982). Criteria for the Classification of English Adverbials, Brussels: AWLsK.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J. L. & D. L. Slobin. (1982). ‘Rules and schemes in the development and use of the English past
tense’, Language 58: 165–189. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caie, G., K. Haastrup, A. L. Jakobsen, J. E. Nielsen, J. Sevaldsen, H. Specht & A. Zettersten (eds) (1990). Proceedings from the 4th Nordic Conference for English Studies (Helsingør, 11–13 May 1989), 2 vols, Department of English, University of Copenhagen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carter, R., & M. McCarthy. (1995). ‘Grammar and the spoken language’, Applied Linguistics 16: 141–158. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Channel, J. 1994. Vague Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Close, R. (1980). ‘
Will in if-clauses’, in Greenbaum, Leech, & Svartvik 1980: 100–109.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coates, J. (1977). ‘A corpus study of modifiers in sequence’, in Bald & Ilson (eds) 1977: 9–27. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coates, J. (1980). ‘On the non-equivalence of may and can
’, Lingua 50: 209–220. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coates, J. (1983). The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries, London: Croom Helm.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coates, J. (1987). ‘Epistemic modality and spoken discourse’, Transactions of the Philological Society 110–131. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coates, J. & G. N. Leech. (1980). ‘The meanings of the modals in modem British and American
English’, York Papers in Linguistics 8: 23–34.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs (1996), London: HarperCollins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collins, P. (1985). ‘
Th-clefts and all-clefts’ Beitrage zur Phonetik und Linguistik 48: 45–53.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collins, P. (1988). ‘The semantics of some modals in contemporary Australian
English’, Australian Journal of Linguistics 8: 261–286. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collins, P. (1991). Cleft and Pseudo-cleft Constructions in English, London & New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collins, P. (1994). ‘The structure of English comparative clauses’, English Studies 75: 157–165. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collins, P. (1996). ‘
Get-passives in English’, World Englishes 15: 43–56. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Conrad, S. (1996). ‘Investigating academic texts with corpus-based techniques: an example
from biology’, Linguistics and Education 8: 299–326. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Conrad, S., & D. Biber. (forthcoming). ‘Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing’, Evaluation in Discourse, ed. by S. Hunston, London: Harper Collins.
Crystal, D. (1980). ‘Neglected grammatical factors in conversational English’, in Greenbaum, Leech, & Svartvik (eds) 1980: 153–166.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dubois, B. L. (1972). ‘Meaning and distribution of the perfect in present-day American English
prose’, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, DAI 33/ 12-A, 6892f, University of New Mexico.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dusková, L. (1971a). ‘Some quantitative aspects of continuous forms in present-day
English’, Prague Studies in English 14: 7–39.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dusková, L. (1971b). ‘On some functional and stylistic aspects of the passive voice in
present-day English’, Philologica Pragensia 14: 117–144.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ehrman, M. (1966). The Meanings of the Modals in Present-day American English, The Hague: Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellegård, A. (1978). The syntactic structure of English texts, Gothenburg Studies in English 43, Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elsness, J. (1981). ‘On the syntactic and semantic functions of
that-clauses’, in Johansson & Tysdahl (eds) 1981: 281–303, Department of English, Oslo University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elsness, J. (1982). ‘
That v. zero connective in English nominal clauses’, ICAME News 6: 1–45.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elsness, J. (1984). ‘
That or zero? A look at the choice of object clause connective in a
corpus of American English’, English Studies 65: 519–533. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elsness, J. (1997). The Perfect and the Preterite in Contemporary and Earlier English, Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enkvist, N. E. (ed.) (1982). Impromptu Speech: A Symposium. Publications of the Research Institute of the Åbo Akademi Foundation 78, Åbo: Åbo Akademi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Erman, B. (1986). ‘Some pragmatic expressions in English conversation’, in Tottie & Bäcklund (eds) 1986: 131–147.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Erman, B. (1987). Pragmatic Expressions in English. A Study of ‘you know’, ‘you see’ and ‘I mean’ in Face-to-face Conversation
, Stockholm Studies in English 69, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fletcher, P. & M. Garman. (1995). ‘Transcription, segmentation and analysis: corpora for the language
impaired’, in Leech et al. (eds) 1995: 116–127.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fox, B. A., & S. A. Thopson. (1990). ‘A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English
conversation’, Language 66: 297–316. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Francis, G. (1991). ‘Nominal groups and clause structure’, Word 42: 145–156. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Francis, W. N. (1992). ‘A versatile suffix: English -en
’, Om språk og utdanning, Festskrift til Eva Sivertsen, ed. by A.-M. Langvall Olsen & A. M. Simensen, 45–54, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fries, U. (1993). ‘The comparison of monosyllabic adjectives’, in The Noun Phrase in English: Its Structure and Variability. Anglistik &
Englischun-terricht. 49, Heidelberg: C. Winter, pp. 25–44.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geisler, C. (1992). ‘Relative Infinitives in spoken and written English’, in Leitner (ed.) 1992: 213–230. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geisler, C. (1995). Relative Infinitives in English, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geluykens, R. (1984). ‘Focus phenomena in English. An empirical investigation into cleft and
pseudoleft sentences’, Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 36, University of Antwerp.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geluykens, R. (1987). ‘Tails (right-dislocations) as a repair mechanism in English
conversation’, in Getting One’s Words into Line: On Word Order and Functional Grammar, J. Nuyts & G. de Schutter (eds), 119–129, Dordrecht: Foris. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geluykens, R. (1988). ‘Five types of clefting in English discourse’, Linguistics 26: 823–841. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geluykens, R. (1991). ‘Information flow in English conversation: a new approach to the given-new
distinction’, in Functional and Systemic Linguistics: Approaches and Uses, E. Ventola (ed), 141–167, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gnutzmann, C., R. Ilson & J. Webster. (1973). ‘Comparative constructions in contemporary English’, English Studies 54: 417–438. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Granger, S. (1983). The ‘be’ + past participle Construction in Spoken English with Special Emphasis
on the Passive, Amsterdam: North-Holland.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greenbaum, S. (1969). Studies in English Adverbial usage, London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greenbaum, S. (1984). ‘Corpus analysis and elicitation tests’, in Aarts & Meijs (eds) 1984: 193–201.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greenbaum, S. (1988). ‘Syntactic devices for compression in English’, in Klegraf & Nehls (eds) 1988: 3–10.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greenbaum, S. & G. Nelson. (1995a). ‘Nuclear and peripheral clauses in speech and writing’, in G. Melchers and B. Warren, Studies in Anglistics, 181–190, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greenbaum, S. & G. Nelson. (1996). ‘Positions of adverbial clauses in British English’, World Englishes 15: 69–81. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greenbaum, S., G. Nelson & M. Weitzman. (1996). ‘Complement clauses in English’, in Thomas & Short (eds) 1996: 76–92.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gustafsson, M. (1982). ‘Textual aspects of topicalization in a corpus of English’, ICAME News 6: 46–76.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gustafsson, M. (1983). ‘Fronting of adverbials in four genres of English’, in Jacobson (ed.) 1983: 7–17.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haan, P. de. (1984). ‘Relative clauses compared’, ICAME News 8: 47–59.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haan, P. de. (1987). ‘Relative clauses in indefinite noun phrases’, English Studies 68: 171–190. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haan, P. de. (1988). ‘A corpus investigation into the behaviour of prepositional
verbs’, in Kytö et al. (eds) 1988: 121–135.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haan, P. de. (1989). Postmodifying Clauses in the English Noun Phrase. A Corpus-based Study, Amsterdam: Rodopi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haan, P. de. (1990). ‘Structure frequency counts of modern English: the set-up of a
quantitative study’, Dutch Working Papers in English Language and Linguistics 13: 1–15.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haase, I. (1988). ‘Temporafolge und Bedingungstyp im Konditionalen
Satzgefuge’, in Mindt (ed.) 1988: 69–76.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, L. (1983). The Semantics of ‘will’ in Present-day British English: a Unified
Account, Brussels: AWLsK.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, L. (1984). ‘Pragmatic conditionals in English’, Folia Linguistica 13: 485–502. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hardy, D., & A. Leuchtmann. (1996). ‘Topic versus cohesion in the prediction of causal ordering in English
conversation’, Discourse Processes 21: 237–254. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hasselgård, H. (1991). ‘Sequences of temporal and spatial adverbials in spoken English: some
pragmatic considerations’, ICAME Journal 15: 3–17.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hasselgård, H. (1992). ‘Sequences of spatial and temporal adverbials in spoken and written
English’, in Leitner (ed.) 1992: 319–328. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hasselgård, H. (1993). ‘Sequences of time and space adverbials in clause-initial position: a
survey of ordering principles’, in Proceedings from the 5th Nordic Association of English Studies
Conference, Reykjavik 1992, 45–57, J. D’Arcy (ed), Reykjavik: University of Iceland Publishing Co..![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hasselgård, H. (1996). Where and when? Positional and Functional Conventions for Sequences of Time and Space Adverbials
in Present-day English, Acta Humaniora 3, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Helt, M. E. (1997). ‘Discourse marker and stance adverbial variation in spoken American
English: A corpus-based analysis’, unpublished. Ph.D. dissertation, Northern Arizona University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hermerén, L. (1978). On Modality in English: A Study of the Semantics of the Modals, Lund Studies in English 53, Lund: Lund University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hermeren, L. (1978). ‘Testing the meanings of modals’, Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 10: 137–140.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hermerén, L. (1986). ‘Modalities in spoken and written English. An inventory of
forms’, in Tottie & Bäcklund (eds) 1986: 57–91.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huddleston, R. (1971). The Sentence in Written English: A Syntactic Study Based on an Analysis of
Scientific Texts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hudson, J. (1990). ‘A computerized study of multiword fixed-phrase adverbials’, in Caie et al. (eds) 1990: 335–341.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hunt, K. W. (1965). ‘Grammatical structures written at three grade levels’, NCTE Research Report No. 3, Champaign, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hurk, I. van den, L. Kager, L. Kemp & M. Masereeuw. (1984). ‘To strand or not to’, ICAME News 8: 71–83.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hüllen, W. (1987). ‘On denoting time in discourse’, in Grammar in the Construction of Texts, J. Monaghan (ed), 50–64, London: Frances Pinter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ikegami, Y. (1989). ‘Have + object + past participle’ and ‘get + object + past participle’ in
the SEU Corpus’, in Meaning and Beyond, U. Fries & M. Heusser (eds), Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacobson, S. (ed.) (1980). Papers from the Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation (Stockholm, 1819 May 1979), Stockholm Studies in English 52, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacobson, S. (1982). ‘Modality nouns and the choice between to + infinitive and
of + ing, Studia Anglica Posnaniensia
15: 61–71.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacobson, S. (ed) (1983). Papers from the Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation (Stockholm, 1516 May, 1982), Stockholm Studies in English 57, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacobson, S. (1985). ‘Form vs. meaning in noun phrases with an
of-construction’, in Papers from the 8th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, O. Togeby (ed), 426–436, Institut for Nordisk Filologi, University of Copenhagen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacobson, S. (ed) (1986). Papers from the 3rd Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation (Stockholm, 11–12 May 1985), Stockholm Studies in English 65, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacobson, S. (1989). ‘Some observations on article variation in English’, in Odenstedt & Persson (eds) 1989: 99–108.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jahr, M.-C. (1981). ‘The s-genitive with non-personal nouns in present-day British and
American English’, ICAME News 5: 14–31.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johannesson, N. L. (1982). ‘On the use of post-modification in English noun phrases’, in The 8th LACUS Forum 1981, W. Gutwinski & G. Jolly (eds), 187–195, Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johansson, C. (1993). ‘
Whose and of which with nonpersonal antecedents in written and spoken
English’, in Souter & Atwell (eds) 1993: 97–116.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johansson, C. (1995). The Relativizers whose and of which in Present-day English. Description and
Theory, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johansson, S. (1980). Plural Attributive Nouns in Present-day English, Lund Studies in English 59, Lund: Lund University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johansson, S. & B. Tysdahl. (eds) (1981). Papers from the 1st Nordic Conference for English Studies (Oslo, 1719 September
1980), Department of English, University of Oslo.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johansson, S. (1986). ‘Some observations on the order of adverbial particles and objects in the
LOB Corpus’, in Jacobson (ed.) 1986: 51–62.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johansson, S. (1995). ‘Some aspects of verb-adverb combinations’, in Aarts & Meyer (eds) 1995: 219–240.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johansson, S. & E. H. Norheim. (1988). ‘The subjunctive in British and American English’, ICAME Journal 12: 27–36.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johansson, S. & S. Oksefjell. (1996). ‘Towards a unified account of the syntax and semantics of
GET’, in Thomas & Short (eds) 1996: 57–75.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kennedy, G. (1987). ‘Expressing temporal frequency in academic English’, TESOL Quarterly 21: 69–86. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kennedy, G. (1987). ‘Quantification and the use of English: A case study of one aspect of the
learner’s task’, Applied Linguistics 8: 264–286. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kirk, J. M. (1988). ‘Inter-corpus comparisons. The primary verb BE’, in Proceedings of the XIII ALLC Conference, Norwich, 1986, J. Hamesse (ed), 123–133.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kjellmer, G. (1979). ‘On clause-introductory nor and neither
’, English Studies 60: 280–295. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kjellmer, G. (1980). ’Accustomed to swim: accustomed to swimming. On verbal forms after to’, in Allwood & Ljung (eds) 1980: 75–99.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kjellmer, G. (1980). ‘“There is no hiding you in the house”: on a modal use of the English
gerund’, English Studies 61: 47–60. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kjellmer, G. (1982). ‘
Each other and one another. On the use of the
English reciprocal pronouns’, English Studies 63: 231–254. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kjellmer, G. (1982). ‘What to do? On non-finite direct questions in English’, English Studies 63: 446–454. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kjellmer, G. (1983). ‘“He is one of the few men in history who plays jazz on a violin”. On
number concord in certain relative clauses’, Anglia 101: 299–314. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kjellmer, G. (1984). ‘On the grammatical number of relative what
’, English Studies 65: 256–273. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kjellmer, G. (1985). ‘
Help to/help revisited’, English Studies 66: 156–161. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kjellmer, G. (1986). “Us Anglos are a cut above the field”: On objective pronouns in
nominative contexts’, English Studies 67: 445–449. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kjellmer, G. (1988). ‘“What a night on which to die!” On symmetry in English relative
clauses’, English Studies 69: 559–568. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kjellmer, G. (1989). ‘Even if and even though’, English Studies 70: 256–269. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kjellmer, G. (1992). ‘
Old as he was: a note on concessiveness and causality’, English Studies 73: 337–350. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krogvig, I. & S. Johansson. (1984). ‘
Shall and will in British and American English: a
frequency study’, Studia Linguistica 38: 70–87. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krug, M. (1994). ‘Contractions in spoken and written English: A corpus-based study of
brachychronic language change’, unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Exeter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kussmaul, P. (1978). ‘
In fact, actually, anyway: Indikatoren von Sprechakten in Informellen
Ge-sprochenen Englisch’, Die Neueren Sprachen 27: 357–369.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lange, D. (1988). ‘Tempusrelationen und Verben im Zusammenhang mit
that-clauses’, in Mindt (ed) 1988: 84–93.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, G. & J. Coates. (1980). ‘Semantic indeterminacy and the modals’, in Greenbaum, Leech & Svartvik (eds) 1980: 79–90.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, G. & J. Culpeper. (1997). ‘The comparison of adjectives in recent British English’, in T. Nevalainen & L. Kahlas-Tarkka (eds) To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of
Matti Rissanen, 353–374, Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, G. & Li, L. (1995). ‘Indeterminacy between noun phrases and adjective phrases as complements
of the English verb’, in Aarts & Meyer 1995: 183–202.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leitner, G. (ed.) (1992). New Directions in English Language Corpora. Methodology, Results, Software
Developments, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leitzke, E. (1989). (De)nominale Adjektive im heutigen Englisch. Untersuchungen zur Morphologie,
Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik von Adjektiv-Nomen-Kombinationen der Typen ‘atomic
energy’ und ‘criminal lawyer’, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lindblad, I. & M. Ljung (eds) (1987). Proceedings from the 3rd Nordic Conference for English Studies (Hässelby, 25–27 September 1986), 2 vols. Stockholm Studies in English 73, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Magnusson, U. (1989). ‘The verb do in the LOB Corpus’, in Odenstedt & Persson (eds) 1989: 131–145.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mair, C. (1987). ‘
For/to-infinitival clauses in contemporary British English. A study
based on the material collected in the Survey of English Usage, University College
London’, English Studies 68: 545–559. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mair, C. (1987). ‘Tough-movement in present-day British English. A corpus-based
study’, Studia Linguistica 41: 59–71. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mair, C. (1987). ‘Instabile Infinitivkonstruktionen im heutigen Englisch’, Linguistische Berichte 3: 381–397.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mair, C. (1988). ‘Extraposed gerundial subject clauses in present-day British English. An
investigation of the corpus of the Survey of English Usage, University College
London’, Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 13: 51–63.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mair, C. (1990). Infinitival Complement Clauses in English: A Study in Discourse, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mair, C. (1994). ‘Is see becoming a conjunction? The study of
grammaticalisation as a meeting ground for corpus linguistics and grammatical
theory’, in Fries et al. (eds) 1994: 127–137.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mair, C. (1995). ‘Changing patterns of complementation, and concomitant grammaticalisation,
of the verb help in present-day British English’, in Aarts & Meyer (eds) 1995: 258–272.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCarthy, M. J. and Carter, R A. (1997). ‘Grammar, tails and affect: constructing expressive choices in
discourse’, Text 17 (3), 405–429. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meijs, W. (1984). ‘“You can do so if you want to”-some elliptic structures in Brown and LOB
and their syntactic description’, in Aarts & Meijs (eds) 1984: 141–162.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meijs, W. (ed.) (1987). Corpus Linguistics and Beyond. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference
on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, Amsterdam: Rodopi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meyer, C. F. (1987). A Linguistic Study of American Punctuation, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meyer, C. F. (1987). ‘Apposition in English’, Journal of Engfish Linguistics 20: 101–121. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meyer, C. F. (1989). ‘Restrictive apposition: an intermediate category’, English Studies 70: 147–166. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meyer, C. F. (1991). ‘A corpus-based study of apposition in English’, in Aijmer & Altenberg (eds) 1991: 166–181.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meyer, C. F. (1991). Apposition in Contemporary English, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meyer, C. F. (1995). ‘Coordination ellipsis in spoken and written American
English’, Language Sciences 17: 241–269. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meyer, C. F. (1996). ‘Coordinate structures in English’, World Englishes 15: 29–41. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mindt, D. (1987). Sprache. Grammatik, Unterrichts-grammatik: Futurischer Zeitbezug im Englischen
I, Frankfurt am Main: Diesterweg (Schule und For-schung, Schrifenreihe für Studium und Praxis).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mindt, D. (1988). EDV in der angewandten Linguistik. Ziele-Methode Ergebnisse, Frankfurt am Main: Diesterweg.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mindt, D. (1995). An Empirical Grammar of the English Verb: Modal Verbs, Berlin: Cornelsen Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Myhill, J. (1995). ‘Change and continuity in the functions of the American English
modals’, Linguistics 33: 157–211. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Myhill, J. (1997). ‘
Should and ought: the rise of individually oriented
modality in American English’, English Language and Linguistics 1: 3–23. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nakamura, J. (1991). ‘The relationships among genres in the LOB corpus based upon the
distribution of grammatical tags’, JACET (The Japan Association of College English Teachers), Bulletin 22: 55–74.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nakamura, J. (1992). ‘The comparison of the Brown and the LOB corpora based upon the
distribution of grammatical tags’, Journal of Foreign Languages and Literature 3: 43–58, College of General Education, University of Tokushima.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nakamura, J. (1993). ‘Quantitative comparison of modals in the Brown and LOB
corpora’, ICAME Journal 17: 29–48.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nässlin, S. (1984).
The English Tag Question: A Study of Sentences Containing Tags of the
Type ‘isn’t it?’ and ‘is it?’ Stockholm Studies in English 60, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nattinger, J. R. & J. S. DeCarrico. (1992). Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching, Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nehls, D. (1988). ‘Der englische Verbalaspekt’, in Bald 1988b: 192–208.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nevalainen, T. & M. Rissanen. (1986). ‘“Do you support the do-support?” Emphatic and non-emphatic DO in
affirmative statements in present-day spoken English’, in Jacobson (ed.) 1986: 35–50.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noël, J. (1993). ‘Adjectives and nouns with reported clauses’ ICAME Journal 17: 49–71.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Odenstedt, B. & G. Persson (eds) (1989). Instead of Flowers. Papers in Honour of Mats Rydén on the Occasion of his 60th
Birthday, Umeå Studies in the Humanities 90, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Olofsson, A. (1981). Relative Junctions in Written American English, Gothenburg studies in English 50, Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Olofsson, A. (1990). ‘A participle caught in the act. On the prepositional use of
following
’, Studia Neophi-lologica 62: 23–35. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oostdijk, N. (1984). ‘An extended affix grammar for the English noun phrase’, in Aarts & Meijs (eds) 1984: 95–122.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oostdijk, N. (1986). ‘Coordination and gapping in corpus analysis’, in Aarts & Meijs (eds) 1986: 177–201.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oostdijk, N. (1988). ‘A corpus linguistic approach to linguistic variation’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 3: 12–25. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oostdijk, N. & P. de Haan. (1994). ‘Clause patterns in Modern British English: a corpus-based (quantitative)
study’, ICAME Journal 18: 41–79.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Opdahl, L. (1990). ‘
Close or closely as verb modifier? In search of explanatory
parameters’, in Caie et al. (eds) 1990: 201–212.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Opdahl, L. (1991). ‘
-ly as adverbial suffix: corpus and elicited material
compared’, ICAME Journal 15:19–35.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Övergaard, G. (1987). ‘Duration, progression, and the progressive form in temporal
as-clauses’, in Lind-blad & Lung (eds) 1987: 265–280.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Övergaard, G. (1992). ‘On the use of the andative subjunctive in English language the time
machine’, in Papers in Honour of Bengt Odenstedt, L.-E. Edlund & G. Persson (eds), 203–227, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Palmer, F. R. (1988). The English Verb, 2nd edn, London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paradis, C. (1997). Degree Modifiers of Adjectives in Spoken British English, Lund: Lund University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Persson, G. (1974). Repetition in English. Part 1: Sequential Repetition, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Persson, G. (1989). ‘On the semantics of collective nouns in English’, in Odenstedt & Persson (eds) 1989: 179–188.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prince, E. F. (1978). ‘A comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts
in discourse’, Language 54: 883–906. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, R. (1960). ‘Towards a description of English usage’, Transactions of the Philological Society, 40–61. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, R. (1965). ‘Descriptive statement and serial relationship’, Language 41: 205–217. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, R. (1970). ‘Aspect and variant inflexion in English verbs’, Language 46: 300–311. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, R. (1984). ‘Recent work on adverbial realisation and position’, in Aarts & Meijs (eds) 1984: 185–192.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, R., A. Duckworth, J. Rusiecki, J. Svartvik & A. Colin. (1964). ‘Studies in the correspondence of prosodic to grammatical features in
English’, in Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Linguists, 679–691, The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Randow, E. Von. (1986). Valente Substantive des Englischen. Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 294, Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ringbom, H. & M. Rissanen (eds) (1984). Proceedings from the 2nd Nordic Conference for English Studies, (Hanasaari/Hanaholmen, 19–21 May 1983). Publications of the Research Institute of the Åbo Akademi Foundation 92, Åbo: Åbo Akademi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rissanen, M. (1980). ‘On the position of only in present day written
English’, in Jacobson (ed) 1980: 63–76.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rudanko, J. (1991). ‘On verbs governing -ing in present-day
English’, English Studies 72: 55–72. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rudanko, J. (1992). ‘
Resorting to and turning to: on verbs governing -ing
to in present-day English’, English Studies 73: 68–79. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rudanko, J. (1995). ‘
Balking at and working at: On verbs governing -ing
at in present-day English’, English Studies 76: 264–281. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rusiecki, J. (1985). Adjectives and Comparison in English. A semantic study, London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rycker, T. De. (1984). Imperative Structures: Form and Function in Conversational English. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 38, Department of Linguistics, University of Antwerp.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sahlin, E. (1979). “Some” and “any” in spoken and written
English
, Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 38, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schiffrin, D. (1981). ‘Tense variation in narrative’, Language 57: 45–62. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schiffrin, D. (1985a). Multiple constraints on discourse options: A quantitative analysis of
causal sequences’, Discourse Processes 8: 281–303. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schiffrin, D. (1985b). ‘Conversational coherence: The role of well
’, Language 61: 640–667. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schneider, E. W. (1992). ‘
Who(m)? Case marking of wh-pronouns in written
British and American English’, in Leitner (ed.) 1992: 231–245. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Souter, C. & E. Atwell (eds) (1993). Corpus-based Computational Linguistics, Amsterdam: Rodopi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stein, G. (1979). Studies in the Function of the Passive, Tübingen: Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stein, G. & R. Quirk. (1991). ‘On having a look in a corpus’, in Aijmer & Altenberg (eds) 1991: 197–203.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stenström, A.-B. (1982). ‘Feedback’, in Enkvist (ed.) 1982: 319–340.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stenström, A.-B. (1983). ‘Questioning strategies in English and Swedish
conversation’, in Cross-language Analysis and Second Language Acquisition 2, K. Sajavaara (ed), 67–78, Jyväskylä Cross Language Studies 10, Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stenström, A.-B. (1984a). ‘Discourse tags’, in Aarts & Meijs (eds) 1984: 65–81.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stenström, A.-B. (1984b). Questions and Responses in English Conversation, Lund Studies in English 68, Lund: Lund University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stenström, A.-B. (1986). ‘What does really really do? Strategies in speech and
writing’, in Tottie & Backlund (eds) 1986: 149–163, reprinted in Grammar in the Construction of Texts, J. Monaghan (ed.), 65–79, London: Frances Pinter, 1987.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stenström, A.-B. (1986). ‘A study of pauses as demarcators in discourse and syntax’, in Aarts & Meijs (eds) 1986: 203–218.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stenström, A.-B. (1987). ‘Carry-on signals in English conversation’, in Meijs (ed.) 1987: 87–119.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stenström, A.-B. (1990). ‘What is the role of discourse signals in sentence
grammar?’, in Aarts & Meijs (eds) 1990: 213–229.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stenström, A.-B. (1995). ‘Some remarks on comment clauses’, in Aarts & Meyer (eds) 1995: 290–301.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stenström, A.-B. & J. Svartvik. (1993). ‘Imparsable speech: repeats and other nonfluencies in spoken
English’, in Oostdijk & de Haan (eds) 1993: 241–254.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Svartvik, J. (1966). On Voice in the English Verb, The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Svartvik, J. (1968). ‘Plotting divided usage with dare and
need
’, Studia Neophilologica 40: 130–140. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Svartvik, J. (1980). ‘
Well in conversation’, in Greenbaum, Leech, & Svartvik (eds) 1980: 167–177.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Svartvik, J. (1982). ‘The segmentation of impromptu speech’, in Enkvist (ed.) 1982: 131–145.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Svartvik, J. & O. Ekedahl. (1995). ‘Verbs in public and private speaking’, in Aarts & Meyer (eds) 1995: 273–289.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sørheim, M.-C. J. (1981). ‘The genitive in a functional sentence perspective’, in Johansson & Tysdahl (eds) 1981: 405–423.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taglicht, J. (1977). ‘Relative clauses as postmodifiers: Meaning, syntax and
intonation’, in Bald & Ilson (eds) 1977: 73–107.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taglicht, J. (1983). Message and Emphasis, London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taglicht, J. (1988). ‘Relative clauses in English’, in Bald 1988b: 244–253.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tesch, F. (1988). ‘Some und any in affirmativen und negativen
Kontexten’, in Mindt (ed.) 1988: 59–68.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tesch, F. (1990). Die Indeftnitpronomina ‘some’ und ‘any’ im Autentischen Englischen
Sprachgebrauch und in Lehrwerken, Tübingen: Gunter Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thavenius, C. (1983). Referential Pronouns in English Conversation, Lund Studies in English 64, Lund: Lund University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thavenius, C. (1984). ‘Pronominal chains in English conversation’, in Ringbom & Rissanen (eds) 1984: 209–219.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, S. A. (1983). ‘Grammar and discourse: The English detached participial
clause’, in Discourse Perspectives on Syntax, F. Klein-Andreu (ed), 43–65, New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, S. A. (1985). ‘Grammar and written discourse: Initial versus final purpose clauses in
English’, Text 5: 55–84. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, S. A. & A. Mulac. (1991a). ‘The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in
conversational English’, Journal of Pragmatics 15: 237–251. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tottie, G. (1980). ‘Affixal and non-affixal negation. Two systems in (almost) complementary
distribution’, Studia Linguistica 34: 101–123. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tottie, G. (1981). ‘Negation and discourse strategy in spoken and written
English’, in Variation Omnibus, H. Cedergren & D. Sankoff (eds), 271–284, Edmonton, Alberta: Linguistic Research.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tottie, G. (1982). ‘Where do negative sentences come from?’ Studia Linguistica 36: 88–105. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tottie, G. (1983). Much about ‘not’ and ‘nothing’: A Study of the Variation between Analytic and
Synthetic Negation in Contemporary American English, Lund: CWK Gleerup.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tottie, G. (1983). ‘The missing link? or, Why is there twice as much negation in spoken
English as in written English?’ in Jacobson (ed) 1983: 67–74.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tottie, G. (1984). ‘Is there an adverbial in this text? (And if so, what is it doing
there?)’, in Ringbom & Rissanen (eds) 1984: 299–315.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tottie, G. (1986). ‘The importance of being adverbial. Adverbials of focusing and contingency
in spoken and written English’, in Tottie & Backlund (eds) 1986: 93–118.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tottie, G. (1988). ‘
No-negation and not-negation in spoken and written
English’, in Kytö et al. (eds) 1988: 245–265.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tottie, G. (1991). Negation in English Speech and Writing. A Study in Variation, San Diego: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tottie, G. & G. Övergaard. (1984). ‘The author’s would. A feature of American
English?’ Studia Linguistica 38: 148–165. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tottie, G. & C. Paradis. (1982). ‘From function to structure. Some pragmatic determinants of syntactic
frequencies in impromptu speech’, in Enkvist (ed.) 1982: 307–317.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vandepitte, S. (1993). A Pragmatic Study of the Expression and the Interpretation of Causality
Conjuncts and Conjunctions in Modern Spoken British English, Verhandelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en
Schone Kunsten van België, Turnhout (Belgium): Brepols Publishers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Varantola, K. (1984). On Noun Phrase Structures in Engineering English, Turku: University of Turku.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Viitanen, O. (1986). ‘On the position of only in English
conversation’, in Tottie & Backlund (eds) 1986: 165–175.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Virtanen, T. (1992a). ‘Temporal adverbials in text structuring: On temporal text
strategy’, in Nordic Research on Text and Discourse, NORDTEXT Symposium 1990, A.-C. Lindeberg, N. E. Enkvist & K. Wikberg (eds), 185–197, Åbo: Åbo Academy Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Virtanen, T. (1992b). Discourse Functions of Adverbial Placement in English, Åbo: Åbo Akademy Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wales, K. (1996). Personal Pronouns in Present-day English, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Warren, B. (1978). Semantic Patterns of Noun-noun Compounds, Gothenburg Studies in English 41, Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Warren, B. (1984). Classifying Adjectives, Gothenburg Studies in English 56, Gothenburg: Acta Universi-tatis Gothoburgensis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Warren, B. (1987). ‘A certain misclassification’, in Lindblad & Ljung (eds) 1987: 363–377.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wekker, H. (1976). The Expression of Future Time in Contemporary British English, Amsterdam: North-Holland.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Westney, P. (1986). ‘How to be more or less certain in English: Scalarity in epistemic
modality’, IRAL 24: 311–320. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wikberg, K. (1989). ‘On the role of the lexical verb in discourse’, in Essays on English Language in Honour of Bertil Sundby, L. E. Breivik, A. Hille & S. Johansson (eds), 375–388. Studia Anglistica Norve-gica 4, Oslo: Novus Forlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wikberg, K. (1993). ‘Verbs as indicators of text type and/or style: some observations on the
LOB Corpus’, in Souter & Atwell (eds) 1993: 127–145.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)