Cover not available
Part of
Japanese Mood and Modality in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theory and Application
Edited by Ken-Ichi Kadooka
[Not in series 234] 2021
► pp. 1–6

Chapter 1
Introduction

| Ryukoku University
Published online: 23 March 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.234.int
References
Butler, C. S.
(2003) Structure and Function: An Introduction to Three Major Structural Functional Theories. Part 1: Approaches to the Simplex Clause. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fukui, Nagisa
(2013) Description of mood in Japanese: Examining mood types in a selected set of text. In E. A. Thomson and W. S. Armour (eds) Systemic Functional Perspectives of Japanese: Descriptions And Applications. Oakville, TN: Equinox, 65–100.Google Scholar
Fukuda, Kazuo
(2016) “Kinou Bumpou de no Johou Taikei, Modality no Teigi (The Mood System within the Systemic Framework, and the Definition of Modality)” in Kadooka et al.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1970) “Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English,” in Foundations of Language: International Journal of Language and Philosophy, 6, 322–61.Google Scholar
(1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 1st Ed. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
(1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd Ed., Arnold, London.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
(2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd Ed. Arnold, London.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen
(2014) Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th edition. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iimura, Ryuichi
(2016) “Kinou Bumpou ni yoru Modality Bunseki ni mukete (Toward the Modality Analysis by the Systemic Grammar)” in Kadooka et al.Google Scholar
Kadooka, Ken-ichi
(2016) “Kinou Bumpou ni yoru Kijutsu Taikei (The Description System of the Systemic Grammar)” in Kadooka et al.Google Scholar
Kadooka, Ken-ichi. et al.
(2016) Kinou Bunpou ni yoru Nihongo Modality Kenkyuu (A Systemic Analysis of the Modality of Japanese). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Kato, Sumi
(2016) “Text Bunseki no naka de Taijin-teki Gengo Shigen wo Kangaeru (Searching the Interpersonal Resources in the Text Analyses)” in Kadooka et al.Google Scholar
Masuoka, Takashi
(2007) Nihongo Modariti Tankyu [A quest of Japanese Modality] Tokyo: Kuroshio.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
(2009) Modality in the Japanese Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, H.
(2014) Modariti no teigi wo megutte [On the definition of modality] H. Sawada (ed.) Modality I: Theory and Method. Hitsuji Imironn Koza 3. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo, 1–23.Google Scholar
Nitta, Y.
(2009) Nihongo no modariti to sono shuhen [Modality in Japanese and its surroundings]. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R.
(2001) Mood and Modality. (second edition) Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sawada, Harumi
(ed.) (2014) Modality I: Riron to Houhou (Modality: Theory and Methodology). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Tatsuki, Masaaki
(2000) Teema / Reema no kaisyaku to suupura teema: Puraagu gengo gakuha kara sentaku taikei kinoo gengogaku e [The interpretation of theme / rheme and the supra-theme: from Prague School linguistics to Systemic Functional Linguistics] Koizumi, T. (ed.) Gengo Kenkyuu ni okeru Kinoo Syugi [Functionalism in Linguistic Studies] Tokyo: Kuroshio, 49–73.Google Scholar
(2004) Communicative Unit niyoru teemabunseki; The Kyoto Grammar no wakugumi de [Analyzing the Japanese Thematic Structure in a Communicative Unit: the Kyoto Grammar Approach] Doshihsa Daigaku Eigo Eibungaku Kenkyu [Doshisha studies in English] Vol. 76, 1–20.Google Scholar
(2008) Nichieigo no kateikei ni kansuru kosatsu: the Kyoto Grammar ni yoru nihongo kateikei bunseki [A System Network of Japanese process Types: A Semanticization of Japanese Verbs and Adjectives through the Kyoto Grammar Approach] Doshihsa Daigaku Eigo Eibungaku Kenkyu [Doshisha studies in English] Vol. 83, 69–98.Google Scholar
Teruya, Kazuhiro
(2004) Metafunctional profile of the grammar of Japanese. In A. Cafferal, J. R. Martin and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen (eds). Language Typology; A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, P.A.: John Benjamins, 427–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) A Systemic Functional Grammar of Japanese. London: Continuum.Google Scholar