The Life Cycle of Adpositions

| University of Oregon
ISBN 9789027208828 | EUR 90.00 | USD 135.00
ISBN 9789027259844 | EUR 90.00 | USD 135.00
Adpositions are used, universally, to mark the roles of nominal participants in the verbal clause, most commonly indirect object roles. Practically all languages seem to have such markers, which begin their diachronic life as lexical words -- in this case either serial verbs or positional nouns. In many languages, however, adpositions also seem to have extended their diachronic life one step further, becoming verbal affixes. The main focus of this book is the tail-end of the diachronic life cycle of adpositions. That is, the process by which, having arisen first as nominal-attached prepositions or post-positions, they wind up attaching themselves to verbs. Our core puzzle is thus fairly transparent: How and why should morphemes that pertain functionally to nominals, and begin their diachronic life-cycle as nominal grammatical operators, wind up as verbal morphology? While the core five chapters of this book focus on the rise of verb-attached prepositions in Homeric Greek, its theoretical perspective is broader, perched at the intersection of three closely intertwined core components of the study of human language: (a) the communicative function of grammar; (b) the balance between universality and cross-language diversity of grammars; and (c) the diachrony of grammatical constructions, how they mutate over time. While paying well-deserved homage to the traditional Classical scholarship, this study is firmly wedded to the assumption, indeed presupposition, that Homeric Greek is just another natural language, spoken before written, designed as an instrument of communication, and subject to the same universal constraints as all human languages. And further, that those constraints--so-called language universals--express themselves most conspicuously in diachronic change. Lastly, in analyzing the synchronic variation and text distribution of prepositional constructions in Homeric Greek, this study relies primarily on the theory-laden method of Internal Reconstruction.
[Not in series, 236]  2021.  xii, 205 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Chapter 1. How do nominal case-markers become verbal affixes?
Chapter 2. The diachronic baseline: Pre-nominal prepositions in Homeric Greek
Chapter 3. The diachronic target: Pre-verbal prepositions in Homeric Greek
Chapter 4. Detached (‘severed’) prepositions in Homeric Greek
Chapter 5. The pre-verbal ‘Augment’ e- in Homeric Greek as an earlier cycle of pre-verbal prepositions
Chapter 6. The pre-verbal ‘Augment’ e- in Homeric Greek when preceded by prepositions
Chapter 7. Mirror image: How English prepositions became post-verbal clitics


Bakker, E. J.
(2001) “Similies, augment, and the language of immediacy”, in J. Watson (ed. 2001) Speaking volumes: Orality and Literacy in the Greek and Roman World, Leiden.Google Scholar
Bréal, M.
(1900) “Les commencements du verbe”, Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 11.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., W. Pagliuca and R. Perkins
(1994) The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in Languages of the World, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey
. The Works of Geoffrey Chaucer, facsimile of the William Morris’ Kelmscott Chaucer, Cleveland and New York: The World Publishing Company (1954) Google Scholar
Craig, C.
(1986) “Rama relational affixes: From post-positions to verbal prefixes”, Linguistics Department, University of Oregon, Eugene (ms.).Google Scholar
Craig, C. and K. Hale
(1987) “Oblique relations and re-analysis in some languages of the Americas”, Language, 64.2.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, R. J.
(1924) A Lexicon of the Homeric Dialect, revised and expanded edition, Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press [1963] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dottin, G.
(1894) L’augment des Verbes Composés dans l’Odyssée et l’Iliade, Rennes. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gildea, S.
(ed. 2000) Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Linguistics and Grammaticalization, TSL #43, Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
(1971) “Historical sysntax and synchronic morphology: An archaeologist’s field trip”, CLS #6, Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society; revised version in Givón (2015, ch. 1).Google Scholar
(1975) “Serial verbs and syntactic change: Niger-Congo”, in C. Li (ed 1975), revised in Givón (2015, ch. 7).Google Scholar
(1979/2019) On Understanding Grammar, revised edition, Amsterdam: J. Benjamins [2019] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed. 1983) Topic Continuity in Discourse: Quantitative Text-Based Studies, TSL #3, Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1984) “Direct object and dative shifting: Semantic and pragmatic case”, in F. Plank (ed.) Objects, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1988) “The pragmatics of word-order: Predictability, importance and attention”, in E. Moravcsik, J. Wirth. and M. Hammond (eds) Typology and Language Universals, TSL #17, Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) “Internal Reconstruction: As method, as theory”, in S. Gildea (ed. 2000) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Syntax: An Introduction, Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity, Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Ute Reference Grammar, Amstrdam: J. Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) The Diachrony of Grammar, Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) The Story of Zero, Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2020) Coherence, Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J.
(1966) “Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements, in J. Greenberg (ed.) Universals of language. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2000) “The concept of proof in genetic linguistics”, in S. Gildea (ed. 2000) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, R. N.
(1958) Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, B., U. Claudi and F. Hüneemeyer
(1991) Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B. and T. Kuteva
(2007) The Genesis of Grammar, Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Homer, The Iliad
tr. by A. T. Murray (orig. 1924, reprinted 1998), Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. and E. C. Traugott
(1982) Grammaticalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Imbert, C.
(2008) Dynamique des Systemes et Motivations Fonctionelles dans l’Encodage de la Trajectoire: Description Typologique de Grec Homérique et du Vieil-Anglais, Lyon: U. de Lyon 2, doctoral thesis (ms.). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kapitonov, I.
(2019) A Grammar of Kunbarlang, PhD Dissertation, University of Melbourne, School of Languages and Linguistics (ms.)Google Scholar
Kimenyi, A.
(1976) A Relational Grammar of KinyaRwanda, PhD dissrtation, UCLA (ms.)Google Scholar
(1868) De augmento apud Homerum omisso, Braunschweig.Google Scholar
Koenig, C., B. Heine and K. Legère
(2020) The Akie Language of Tanzania: A Sketch Discourse Grammar, Universitaet zu Koeln (ms.)Google Scholar
Lehmann, W. P.
(1969) “Proto-Indo-European compounds in relation to other Proto-Indo-European syntactic patters”, Acta Linguistics Hafniensia, XII.Google Scholar
(1974) Proto-Indo-European Syntax, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, E.
(1989) Killshot, NY: W. Morrow, Arbor House.Google Scholar
Li, C. N.
(ed. 1975) Word Order and Word Order Change, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Luraghi, S.
(2003) On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases, SLCS #67, Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mallory, Sr. Thomas
. Mallory: Works ed. by Eugene Vinaver, London: Oxford University Press (1954).Google Scholar
Monro, D. B.
(1891) A Grammar of the Homeric Dialect, Oxford Clarendon Press, reprinted by BiblioLife, LLC.Google Scholar
Popper, K.
(1934/1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery, NY: Harper & Row. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, William
(ca. 1610) The Tragedy of Coriolanus, with preface & glossary by I. Gollancz, London: M. Dent & Co. [1896].Google Scholar
Smyth, H. B.
(1920) Greek Grammar for Colleges, American Book Company.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
(1970) A Grammar of Atzugewi, PhD dissertation, Berkeley: University of California (ms.)Google Scholar
Tibbits, B.
(1987a) “Some lexicalization patterns in the Rama verb”, University of Oregon, Eugene (ms.)Google Scholar
(1987b) “Cliticization of adpositions in Rama”, University of Oregon, Eugene (ms.)Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. and B. Heine
(eds. 1991) Approaches to Grammaticalization, TSL #19.1,2, Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. Crossref CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Emden Boas, E., A. Rijksbaron, L. Huitink and M. de Bakker
(2019) The Cambridge Grammar of Classical Greek, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, C.
(1963) “Preliminaries to a historical and comparative analysis of the syntax of the Old Irish verb”, Cetica, 6.Google Scholar
Willi, A.
(2018) Origins of the Greek Verb, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, K.
(1965) A Grammar of the Kolokuma Dialect of Ijo, West African Language Monograph, 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zanchi, C.
(2019) Multiple Preverbs in Ancient Indo-European Languages, Tübingen: Narr Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CFF – Historical & comparative linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009010 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Historical & Comparative
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2021009347 | Marc record