Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology

Volume 1

Editor
| Michigan State University
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027221803 (Eur) | EUR 174.00
ISBN 9781556195341 (USA) | USD 261.00
e-Book Buy from our e-platform
ISBN 9789027298416 | EUR 174.00 | USD 261.00
 
Perceptual dialectology investigates what ordinary people (as opposed to professional linguists) believe about the distribution of language varieties in their own and surrounding speech communities and how they have arrived at and implement those beliefs. It studies the beliefs of the common folk about which dialects exist and, indeed, about what attitudes they have to these varieties. Some of this leads to discussion of what they believe about language in general, or “folk linguistics”. Surprising divergences from professional results can be found. For the professional, it is intriguing to find out why and whether the folk can be wrong or whether the professional has missed something.

Volume 1 of this handbook aims to provide for the field of perceptual dialectology:

  • a historical survey;
  • a regional survey, adding to the earlier preponderance of studies in Japan, the Netherlands, and the United States;
  • a methodological survey, showing, in detail, how data have been acquired and processed;
  • an interpretive survey, showing how these data have been related to both linguistic and other socio-cultural facts;
  • a comprehensive bibliography.
The results and methods of perceptual dialectical studies should be interesting not only to linguists, variationists, dialectologists, and students of the social psychology of language but also to sociologists, anthropologists, folklorists, and other students of culture as well as to language planners and educators.
[Not in series, HPD 1]  1999.  xl, 413 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
List of Figures
ix–xiv
List of Tables
xv–xvi
Series Editor’s Introduction
xvii–xviii
Acknowledgments
xix–xxi
Introduction
Dennis R. Preston
xxiii–xl
I: The Dutch Contribution: ‘Little Arrows’
1
Informant Classification of Dialects
W.G. Rensink
3–7
Dialects
Jo Daan
9–30
The Netherlands-German National Border as a Subjective Dialect Boundary
Ludger Kremer
31–36
II: The Japanese Controversy: ‘Subjective’ and ‘Objective’
37
Consciousness of Dialect Boundaries
Takesi Sibata
39–62
Consciousness of Linguistic Boundaries and Actual Linguistic Boundaries
Kikuo Nomoto
63–69
Dialect Consciousness and Dialect Divisions: Examples in the Nagano-Gifu Boundary
Yoshio Mase
71–99
On Dialect Consciousness: Dialect Characteristics Given by Speakers
Yoshio Mase
101–113
The Discussion Surrounding the Subjective Boundaries of Dialects
Willem Grootaers
115–129
On the Value of Subjective Dialect Boundaries
Antonius A. Weijnen
131–133
Dialects and the Subjective Judgments of Speakers: Remarks on Controversial Methods
Ton Goeman
135–144
III: Images, Perceptions and Attitudes
145
Classification of Dialects by Image: English and Japanese
Fumio Inoue
147–159
Subjective Dialect Division in Great Britain
Fumio Inoue
161–176
Geographical Perceptions of Japanese Dialect Regions
Daniel Long
177–198
Mapping Nonlinguists’ Evaluations of Japanese Language Variation
Daniel Long
199–226
The Perception of Post-Unification German Regional Speech
Jennifer Dailey-O’Cain
227–242
Variation and the Norm: Parisian Perceptions of Regional French
Lawrence Kuiper
243–262
The Perception of Turkish Dialects
Mahide Demirci and Brian Kleiner
263–281
Regional Variation in Subjective Dialect Divisions in the United States
Donald M. Lance
283–314
A View from the West: Perceptions of U.S. Dialects by Oregon Residents
Laura Hartley
315–332
“Welshness” and “Englishness” as Attitudinal Dimensions of English Language Varieties in Wales
Nikolas Coupland, Angie Williams and Peter Garrett
333–343
Dialect Recognition
Angie Williams, Peter Garrett and Nikolas Coupland
345–358
A Language Attitude Approach to the Perception of Regional Variety
Dennis R. Preston
359–373
References
375–392
Additional Readings
393–401
About the Contributors and Translators
403–408
Index
409–413
“Dennis Preston has done the field of empirical linguistics great service in his earlier work on perceptual dialectology, both to raise our consciousness of the phenomenon and to document some facts about the perception of English varieties. Now he has done it again in the Handbook of Percpetual Dialectology, to expose the foundation of the study of perceptual dialectology and to extend our knowledge of it around the world.”
“The Handbook is recommended to everyone interested in sociolinguistics and the social psychology of language in general, and in dialectology, language attitudes and folk-linguistic awareness in particular.”
“Preston's volume is successful in communicating the problems as well as the insights of perceptual dialectology. The text is highly effective in arguing and illustrating the benefits of such a perspective for a wide array of linguistic subfields and other social sciences. Each chapter is useful in itself, and when linked together, the chapters proffer a well-constructed infrastructure of information. Undoubtedly, this collection will be come a valuable resource to language scholars and social scientists alike.”
Subjects
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  98025334
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2016. The Languages of Diaspora and Return. Brill Research Perspectives in Multilingualism and Second Language Acquisition 1:2-3  pp. 1 ff. https://doi.org/10.1163/2352877X-12340002
Amador-Moreno, Carolina P.
2016.  In Sociolinguistics in Ireland,  pp. 299 ff. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137453471_13
BERNAISCH, TOBIAS
2012. Attitudes towards Englishes in Sri Lanka. World Englishes 31:3  pp. 279 ff. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2012.01753.x
Bijvoet, Ellen & Kari Fraurud
2012. STUDYING HIGH-LEVEL (L1-L2) DEVELOPMENT AND USE AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE IN MULTILINGUAL STOCKHOLM. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34:02  pp. 291 ff. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311200006X
Bijvoet, Ellen & Kari Fraurud
2016. What's the target? A folk linguistic study of young Stockholmers’ constructions of linguistic norm and variation. Language Awareness 25:1-2  pp. 17 ff. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2015.1122021
Boberg, Charles, John Nerbonne & Dominic Watt
2018.  In The Handbook of Dialectology,  pp. 1 ff. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118827628.ch0
Braber, Natalie
2014. The concept of identity in the East Midlands of England. English Today 30:02  pp. 3 ff. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078414000054
Braber, Natalie
2015. Language perception in the East Midlands in England. English Today 31:01  pp. 16 ff. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078414000509
Brunner, Elizabeth Gentry
2009. The Study of Variation from Two Perspectives. Language and Linguistics Compass 3:3  pp. 734 ff. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00137.x
Burkette, Allison Paige
2015.  In Language and Material Culture [IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society, 38], https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.38
Burridge, James
2017. Spatial Evolution of Human Dialects. Physical Review X 7:3 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.031008
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn
2012. Contestation and Enregisterment in Ohio’s Imagined Dialects. Journal of English Linguistics 40:3  pp. 281 ff. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424211427911
Carrie, Erin & Robert M. McKenzie
2018. American or British? L2 speakers’ recognition and evaluations of accent features in English. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 39:4  pp. 313 ff. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2017.1389946
Carvalho, Ana M.
2014.  In Spanish and Portuguese across Time, Place, and Borders,  pp. 183 ff. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137340450_12
Chambers, J.K.
2015. Professor Sibata’shahaand other sociolinguistic insights. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 1:2  pp. 112 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/aplv.1.2.01cha
Drager, Katie
2010. Sociophonetic Variation in Speech Perception. Language and Linguistics Compass 4:7  pp. 473 ff. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00210.x
Fishman, Joshua A.
2004. Ethnicity and supra-ethnicity in corpus planning: the hidden status agenda in corpus planning. Nations and Nationalism 10:1-2  pp. 79 ff. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1354-5078.2004.00156.x
Fraser, Helen
2009. The role of ‘educated native speakers’ in providing language analysis for the determination of the origin of asylum seekers. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law 16:1 https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v16i1.113
Hundt, Marianne
2018. ‘My language, my identity’: negotiating language use and attitudes in the New Zealand Fiji Indian diaspora. Asian Englishes  pp. 1 ff. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2018.1463148
Iannàccaro, Gabriele & Vittorio Dell'Aquila
2001. Mapping languages from inside: Notes on perceptual dialectology. Social & Cultural Geography 2:3  pp. 265 ff. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360120073851
Impe, Leen, Dirk Geeraerts & Dirk Speelman
2008. Mutual Intelligibility of Standard and Regional Dutch Language Varieties. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 2:1-2  pp. 101 ff. https://doi.org/10.3366/E1753854809000330
JANSEN, LUISE
2018. Remake cinématographique, remake phonologique ? La (non-)réalisation du schwa dans Marius 1931 et 2013. Journal of French Language Studies  pp. 1 ff. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269518000030
Kingstone, Sydney
2015. “Scottish”, “English” or “foreign”: Mapping Scottish dialect perceptions. English World-Wide 36:3  pp. 315 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.3.02kin
Kuiper, Lawrence
2005. Perception is reality: Parisian and Provencal perceptions of regional varieties of French1. Journal of Sociolinguistics 9:1  pp. 28 ff. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-6441.2005.00280.x
Lesho, Marivic
2018. Folk perception of variation in Cavite Chabacano. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 33:1  pp. 1 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00001.les
MacKey, William F.
2012.  In The Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism,  pp. 707 ff. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118332382.ch28
Mirshahidi, Shahriar
2017. I find you attractive but I don’t trust you: the case of language attitudes in Iran. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 38:2  pp. 146 ff. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2016.1178268
Montgomery, Chris & Philipp Stoeckle
2013. Geographic information systems and perceptual dialectology: a method for processing draw-a-map data. Journal of Linguistic Geography 1:01  pp. 52 ff. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlg.2013.4
Niedzielski, Nancy
2017. Interview with Dennis Preston. Journal of English Linguistics 45:4  pp. 367 ff. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424217734611
POOLEY, TIM
2015. Shift beyond shift: On the erosion of the collective memory of Picard among adolescents in Lille. Journal of French Language Studies 25:01  pp. 85 ff. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269513000501
Pountain, Christopher J
2011. Putting Philology Back into Linguistics. Hispanic Research Journal 12:2  pp. 99 ff. https://doi.org/10.1179/174582011X12943155134184
Preston, Dennis R.
2015.  In Responses to Language Varieties [IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society, 39],  pp. 1 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.39.01pre
PRIKHODKINE, ALEXEI
2012. Autonomisation du français en usage en Suisse romande: quels indicateurs?. Journal of French Language Studies 22:03  pp. 395 ff. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269511000500
Rieder, Maria
2018. Irish Travellers’ views on Cant: what folk criteria of languageness tell us about the community. Language Awareness 27:1-2  pp. 40 ff. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2018.1431242
Santipolo, Matteo
2016. Folk linguistics and language teaching education. A case study in an Italian secondary school. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 37:3  pp. 297 ff. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2015.1068788
Satyanath, Shobha
2018. Editorial. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 3:2  pp. 123 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/aplv.00001.edi
Schilling, Natalie & Alexandria Marsters
2015. Unmasking Identity: Speaker Profiling for Forensic Linguistic Purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 35  pp. 195 ff. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000282
Schreier, Daniel
2006. The Backyard as a Dialect Boundary. Journal of English Linguistics 34:1  pp. 26 ff. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424206287584
Shuy, Roger W.
2015. Applied Linguistics Past and Future. Applied Linguistics 36:4  pp. 434 ff. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv016
Starr, Rebecca Lurie, Andre Joseph Theng, Kevin Martens Wong, Natalie Jing Yi Tong, Nurul Afiqah Bte Ibrahim, Alicia Mei Yin Chua, Clarice Hui Min Yong, Frances Wei Loke, Helen Dominic, Keith Jayden Fernandez & Matthew Tian Jing Peh
2017. Third culture kids in the outer circle: The development of sociolinguistic knowledge among local and expatriate children in Singapore. Language in Society 46:04  pp. 507 ff. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000380
STEWART, CHRISTOPHER M.
2012. On the Socio-Indexicality of a Parisian French Intonation Contour. Journal of French Language Studies 22:02  pp. 251 ff. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269511000457
Strand, Thea R.
2012. Winning the Dialect Popularity Contest: Mass-mediated Language Ideologies and Local Responses in Rural Valdres, Norway. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 22:1  pp. 23 ff. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2012.01116.x
VAN OSTADE, INGRID TIEKEN-BOON & VIKTORIJA KOSTADINOVA
2015. Have went – an American usage problem. English Language and Linguistics 19:02  pp. 293 ff. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674315000118
Watson, Kevin & Lynn Clark
2015. Exploring listeners’ real-time reactions to regional accents. Language Awareness 24:1  pp. 38 ff. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2014.882346
Xu, Chenchen & Lingfeng Mao
2018. The sociolinguistic meanings of syllable contraction in Chinese. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 3:2  pp. 160 ff. https://doi.org/10.1075/aplv.16004.xu

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 may 2018. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.