Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse
Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation
Author
Frans H. van Eemeren | University of Amsterdam
In Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse, Frans H. van Eemeren brings together the dialectical and the rhetorical dimensions of argumentation by introducing the concept of strategic maneuvering. Strategic maneuvering refers to the arguer’s continual efforts to reconcile aiming for effectiveness with being reasonable. It takes place in all stages of argumentative discourse and manifests itself simultaneously in the choices that are made from the topical potential available at a particular stage, in adaptation to audience demand, and in the use of specific presentational devices. Strategic maneuvering derails when in the specific context in which the discourse takes place a rule for critical discussion has been violated, so that a fallacy has been committed. Van Eemeren makes clear that extending the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation by taking account of strategic maneuvering leads to a richer and more precise method for analyzing and evaluating argumentative discourse.
[Argumentation in Context, 2] 2010. xii, 308 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Preface | pp. xi–xii
-
Chapter 1. Analyzing argumentative discourse | pp. 1–24
-
Chapter 2. Strategic maneuvering between effectiveness and reasonableness | pp. 25–50
-
Chapter 3. Dialectical and rhetorical perspectives on argumentative discourse | pp. 51–92
-
Chapter 4. Three inseparable aspects of strategic maneuvering | pp. 93–128
-
Chapter 5. Strategic maneuvering in conventionalized communicative practices | pp. 129–162
-
Chapter 6. Determining the strategic function of argumentative moves | pp. 163–186
-
Chapter 7. Fallacies as derailments of strategic maneuvering | pp. 187–212
-
Chapter 8. Strategic maneuvering with the burden of proof | pp. 213–240
-
Chapter 9. Strategic maneuvering in response to presumed inconsistency or fallaciousness | pp. 241–262
-
Chapter 10. Setting up an agenda for further research | pp. 263–274
-
-
Index of names | pp. 295–298
-
Index of terms | pp. 299–308
“Van Eemeren’s book offers its readers a comprehensive, unified, updated, self- contained, and well-written account of the extended theory of pragma-dialectics. As such it constitutes a key text of contemporary theory of argumentation, straight from the horse’s mouth. The author shows how the concept of strategic maneuvering can be used to combine dialectical and rhetorical points of view, and how the resulting extended theory works when applied to the analysis and evaluation of argumentation in various domains of communicative activity. The book contains fresh approaches to fallacies, burden of proof, and inconsistency. It is very rich in discussing historical roots as well as contributions from related contemporary research, and even sets up an agenda for future research. ”
Erik C. W. Krabbe, Professor emeritus of logic and argumentation, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
“This is an impressive book. For anyone interested in getting an up-to-date synopsis of this influential argumentation perspective, Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse is a must read.”
Karen Tracy, University of Colorado, in Journal of Argumentation in Context, Vol. 1:2 (2012)
Cited by
Cited by 428 other publications
No author info given
2014.
In Corporate Argumentation in Takeover Bids [Argumentation in Context, 8],
No author info given
2015.
In Argumentation in Political Deliberation [Benjamins Current Topics, 76],
► pp. 1 ff.
No author info given
2015.
In The Concise Encyclopedia of Communication,
► pp. 517 ff.
No author info given
2017.
In Argumentation in the Newsroom [Argumentation in Context, 13],
No author info given
2018.
In Argumentation in Prime Minister’s Question Time [Argumentation in Context, 15],
No author info given
2019.
In Strategic Maneuvering for Political Change [Argumentation in Context, 16],
No author info given
2020.
In The Quest for Argumentative Equivalence [Argumentation in Context, 18],
No author info given
2021.
In An Argumentative Analysis of the Emergence of Issues in Adult-Children Discussions [Argumentation in Context, 19],
No author info given
2021.
In L'argumentation dans le discours,
► pp. 309 ff.
No author info given
2021.
In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,
► pp. 13 ff.
Aakhus, Mark
2015.
In Argumentation in Political Deliberation [Benjamins Current Topics, 76],
► pp. 101 ff.
Aakhus, Mark
2017. The Communicative Work of Organizations in Shaping Argumentative Realities.
Philosophy & Technology 30:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Aakhus, Mark & Marcin Lewiński
2017. Advancing Polylogical Analysis of Large-Scale Argumentation: Disagreement Management in the Fracking Controversy.
Argumentation 31:1 ► pp. 179 ff.
Adams, Brian E.
2015. Working through disagreement in deliberative forums.
The Social Science Journal 52:2 ► pp. 229 ff.
Adler, Silvia, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2018. Annonces des ’journées portes ouvertes’ : style concis et présence énonciative.
SHS Web of Conferences 46 ► pp. 01016 ff.
Al-Duleimi, Abbas Deygan Darweesh & Waleed Ridha Hammoodi
2015. A Pragmatic Study of Strategic Maneuvering in Selected Political Interviews.
Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 05:01 ► pp. 79 ff.
Al-Hindawi, Fareed Hameed & Wafaa Sahib Mehdi Mohammed
2018. Towards an Analytical Model in Critical Pragmatics.
SSRN Electronic Journal
Alves do Nascimento França, Hális
2022.
In New Developments in Legal Reasoning and Logic [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 23],
► pp. 129 ff.
Andone, Corina
2012. Review of Peters (2012): Argument and innovation. Theoretical and empirical explorations in knowledge claim evaluation.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 1:3 ► pp. 387 ff.
Andone, Corina
2015.
In Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 26],
► pp. 19 ff.
Andone, Corina
2015. Pragmatic Argumentation in European Practices of Political Accountability.
Argumentation 29:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Andone, Corina
2016. Argumentative Patterns in the Political Domain: The Case of European Parliamentary Committees of Inquiry.
Argumentation 30:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
Andone, Corina
2016. Delimiting the burden of proof in political interviews.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:1 ► pp. 74 ff.
Andone, Corina
2017.
In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],
► pp. 255 ff.
Andone, Corina
2017.
In Prototypical Argumentative Patterns [Argumentation in Context, 11],
► pp. 53 ff.
Andone, Corina
2022.
In Adversarial Political Interviewing,
► pp. 193 ff.
Andone, Corina & Florin Coman-Kund
2017. Argumentative patterns in the European Union’s directives.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:1 ► pp. 76 ff.
Andone, Corina & Andrea Rocci
2016. Argumentation in journalism: Professional practices and the public sphere.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Andrade Uribe, Schumann Javier
2019. El argumento ad verecundiam en la relación médico-paciente: estudio de caso en procedimientos estéticos.
Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación :18 ► pp. 1 ff.
Anthony Blair, J.
2021.
In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36],
► pp. 61 ff.
Archer, Dawn, Piotr Jagodziński & Rebecca Jagodziński
2021.
In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,
► pp. 206 ff.
Arcidiacono, Francesco & Antonio Bova
2011. Argumentative strategies for conflict management and resolution in Italian and Swiss families.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 30 ► pp. 1385 ff.
Arroyo, José Luis Blas
2015.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Ayala, Ricardo A
2019. Twenty years of management of care in Chile: what we know, what we do not know, what is yet to come. An analysis of arguments.
Medical Humanities 45:3 ► pp. 267 ff.
Barceló Aspeitia, Axel Arturo
2020. Whataboutisms and Inconsistency.
Argumentation 34:4 ► pp. 433 ff.
Barebina, Natal’ya Sergeevna, Mikail Ismailovich Tagiev & Sergey Alexandrovich Tiguntsev
2020. Interpretative Component of Argumentative Constructions of Criticism in the English-Language Reviews as Explication of Assessment in Scientific Discourse.
Filologičeskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki :9 ► pp. 181 ff.
Benoit, William & Jennifer M. Benoit-Bryan
2014. A functional analysis of the 2010 Australian Prime Minister debate.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
Bermejo-Luque, Lilian
2017.
In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10],
► pp. 57 ff.
Bilstrup Finsen, Andreas, Gerard J. Steen & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2021. How do scientists criticize the computer metaphor of the brain?.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:2 ► pp. 171 ff.
Bletsas, Marina
2022. Paroemiological argumentation in Italian and French journalistic discourse.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:2 ► pp. 180 ff.
Boer, Lianne J. M.
2021.
In International Law As We Know It,
Bogaards, Maarten
2021. “Completely impartial opinion, okay?”.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:3 ► pp. 368 ff.
Boogaart, Ronny
2020.
In From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild [Argumentation Library, 35],
► pp. 185 ff.
Boogaart, Ronny, Henrike Jansen & Maarten van Leeuwen
2021.
In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36],
► pp. 1 ff.
Boukala, Salomi
2016. Rethinking topos in the discourse historical approach: Endoxon seeking and argumentation in Greek media discourses on ‘Islamist terrorism’.
Discourse Studies 18:3 ► pp. 249 ff.
Boukala, Salomi
2019.
In European Identity and the Representation of Islam in the Mainstream Press,
► pp. 85 ff.
Bova, Antonio
2015. “This is the cheese bought by Grandpa”.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 4:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
Bova, Antonio
2017.
In Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts,
► pp. 75 ff.
Bova, Antonio
2020. Un estudio de los argumentos de autoridad utilizados por los padres con sus hijos durante las comidas.
Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación :19 ► pp. 1 ff.
Bova, Antonio & Francesco Arcidiacono
2013. Investigating children’s Why-questions: A study comparing argumentative and explanatory function.
Discourse Studies 15:6 ► pp. 713 ff.
Bova, Antonio & Francesco Arcidiacono
2013. Invoking the Authority of Feelings as a Strategic Maneuver in Family Mealtime Conversations.
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 23:3 ► pp. 206 ff.
Bova, Antonio & Francesco Arcidiacono
2015. Beyond conflicts.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3:2 ► pp. 263 ff.
Brambilla, Emanuele
2015. Argumentative equivalence as the reproduction of strategic maneuvering in interpreted texts.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 4:3 ► pp. 299 ff.
Brambilla, Emanuele
2017. Interpreting legal arguments. Insights from the first ICC trial.
International Journal of Legal Discourse 2:2 ► pp. 177 ff.
Brambilla, Emanuele
2022. Antifascist argumentation in Giacomo Matteotti’s 1924 speech to the Italian Parliament.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Burger, Marcel & Laura Delaloye
2016. The framing of argumentation in the making of a political editorial.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Byczyk, Marcin
2018.
In Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity [Studies in the History of Law and Justice, 12],
► pp. 173 ff.
Carranza, Isolda E.
2015.
In The Handbook of Narrative Analysis,
► pp. 57 ff.
Castro, Diego
2022. Argumentation in Suboptimal Settings.
Argumentation 36:3 ► pp. 393 ff.
Catenaccio, Paola
2017.
In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10],
► pp. 197 ff.
Chuanrui, Zhang & Xu Cihua
2017. Argument by multimodal metaphor as strategic maneuvering in video advertising.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:3 ► pp. 359 ff.
Clary-Lemon, Jennifer
2014. Irish emigration in the 1970s: The ‘problem’ discourse of political elites.
Discourse & Society 25:5 ► pp. 619 ff.
Coombes, Michael & Annemaré Kotzé
2021. “Did Augustine Win?” Another Look at an Old Question about the Contra Fortunatum.
Journal of Early Christian History 11:3 ► pp. 18 ff.
Coposescu, Liliana
2015.
In Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 26],
► pp. 161 ff.
Crosswhite, James
2013. The Rhetorical Unconscious of Argumentation Theory:.
Philosophy & Rhetoric 46:4 ► pp. 392 ff.
Csordás, Hédi Virág & Gábor Forrai
2018. What argumentation theory can teach us about commercials: Strategic maneuvering and the ‘tulip test’.
Society and Economy 40:3 ► pp. 389 ff.
Cummings, Louise
2015.
In Reasoning and Public Health: New Ways of Coping with Uncertainty,
► pp. 67 ff.
Dahl, John Magnus R.
2015. Visual argumentation in political advertising.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 4:3 ► pp. 286 ff.
Danblon, Emmanuelle
2013. The Reason of Rhetoric.
Philosophy & Rhetoric 46:4 ► pp. 493 ff.
de Bustos, Eduardo
2017.
In Narration as Argument [Argumentation Library, 31],
► pp. 83 ff.
de Oliveira, Maria do Carmo Leite & Silvia Maura Rodrigues Pereira
2018. Formulations in Delicate Actions: A Study of Analyst Questions in Earnings Conference Calls.
International Journal of Business Communication 55:3 ► pp. 293 ff.
Degano, Chiara
2014.
In Innovative Methods and Technologies for Electronic Discourse Analysis [Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology, ],
► pp. 414 ff.
Degano, Chiara
2014.
In Let's talk politics [Argumentation in Context, 6],
► pp. 149 ff.
Degano, Chiara
2016. Corpus linguistics and argumentation.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:2 ► pp. 113 ff.
Degano, Chiara
2017.
In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10],
► pp. 291 ff.
Demir, Yeliz
2016. Maneuvering strategically in a press conference to diminish political responsibility for a critical event.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Demir, Yeliz
2017.
In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10],
► pp. 229 ff.
DEMİR, Yeliz
2020. Adam Karalama Safsatasına Verilen Yanıtların Sav Modelleri: Facebook Haber Yorumlarından Örnekler.
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi
Doury, Marianne & Assimakis Tseronis
2015.
In Argumentation in Political Deliberation [Benjamins Current Topics, 76],
► pp. 75 ff.
Duerringer, Christopher M. & Z. S. Justus
2016. Tropes in the Rhetoric of Gun Rights: A Pragma-Dialectic Analysis.
Argumentation and Advocacy 52:3 ► pp. 181 ff.
Eckstein, Justin
2014. Yellow Rain.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:1 ► pp. 35 ff.
Eckstein, Justin
2017. Radiolab’s Sound Strategic Maneuvers.
Argumentation 31:4 ► pp. 663 ff.
Eemeren, Frans H.
2015.
In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction,
► pp. 1 ff.
Eemeren, Frans H. van
2021. Examining argumentative style.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 8 ff.
Egres, Dorottya
2021. Strategic maneuvering in extended polylogues.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:2 ► pp. 145 ff.
Fabregat, Silvia Martínez
2016.
In Epistemology, Knowledge and the Impact of Interaction [Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, 38],
► pp. 297 ff.
Fahnestock, Jeanne
2021.
In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36],
► pp. 79 ff.
Fairclough, Isabela
2016. Evaluating policy as argument: the public debate over the first UK austerity budget.
Critical Discourse Studies 13:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Fairclough, Isabela
2019. Deontic power and institutional contexts.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:1 ► pp. 136 ff.
Fairclough, Isabela
2020.
In From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild [Argumentation Library, 35],
► pp. 223 ff.
Fairclough, Isabela & Norman Fairclough
2011. Practical reasoning in political discourse: The UK government’s response to the economic crisis in the 2008 Pre-Budget Report.
Discourse & Society 22:3 ► pp. 243 ff.
Fairclough, Isabela & Irina Diana Mădroane
2020. An Argumentative Approach to “Framing”. Framing, Deliberation and Action in an Environmental Conflict.
Co-herencia 17:32 ► pp. 119 ff.
Fancourt, Nigel & Liam Guilfoyle
2022. Interdisciplinary perspective-taking within argumentation: students’ strategies across science and religious education.
Journal of Religious Education 70:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Feng, Jieyun, Fan Zhao & Aiqing Feng
2021. Strategic Manoeuvring by Dissociation in Corporate Crisis Communication: The Case of the 2017 United Airlines’ Passenger Dragging-Off Incident.
Argumentation 35:2 ► pp. 321 ff.
Ferreira, Maria
2021. A Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Memory Politics: Spanish Contemporary Memory Politics, Populism Studies, and Argumentative Dialectics.
Journal of Nationalism, Memory & Language Politics 15:2 ► pp. 130 ff.
Ferreira, Maria
2021. Compliance with EU Law and Argumentative Discourse: Representing the EU as a Problem-Solving Multilevel Governance System through Discursive Structures of Argumentation.
Argumentation 35:4 ► pp. 645 ff.
Feteris, Eveline T.
2013.
In Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives [Law and Philosophy Library, 102],
► pp. 85 ff.
Feteris, Eveline T.
2016. Prototypical Argumentative Patterns in a Legal Context: The Role of Pragmatic Argumentation in the Justification of Judicial Decisions.
Argumentation 30:1 ► pp. 61 ff.
Feteris, Eveline T.
2017.
In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],
► pp. 59 ff.
Feteris, Eveline T.
2017.
In Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 1],
► pp. 201 ff.
Feteris, Eveline T.
2017.
In Prototypical Argumentative Patterns [Argumentation in Context, 11],
► pp. 71 ff.
Feteris, Eveline T.
2021.
In Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy,
► pp. 1 ff.
Figueiras, Rita
2019. Punditry as a reward system: audience construction and the logics of the punditry sphere.
Critical Studies in Media Communication 36:2 ► pp. 171 ff.
Galimberti, Carlo, Antonio Bova, Carmen Spanò & Ilaria Vergine
2021. Polydimensional Structure and Psychosocial Functions of the Direct Address in TV Series.
Frontiers in Psychology 12
Garssen, Bart
2015.
In Argumentation in Political Deliberation [Benjamins Current Topics, 76],
► pp. 33 ff.
Garssen, Bart
2015.
In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction,
► pp. 1 ff.
Garssen, Bart
2016. Problem-Solving Argumentative Patterns in Plenary Debates of the European Parliament.
Argumentation 30:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Garssen, Bart
2017.
In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],
► pp. 145 ff.
Gascón, José Ángel
2017. Brothers in Arms: Virtue and Pragma-Dialectics.
Argumentation 31:4 ► pp. 705 ff.
Godden, David
2021. The Compliment of Rational Opposition: Disagreement, Adversariality, and Disputation.
Topoi 40:5 ► pp. 845 ff.
González González, Manuela, Julder Gómez & Mariantonia Lemos
2019. Theoretical Considerations for the Articulation of Emotion and Argumentation in the Arguer: A Proposal for Emotion Regulation in Deliberation.
Argumentation 33:3 ► pp. 349 ff.
Greco, Sara
2017. F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen (eds): Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory.
Argumentation 31:1 ► pp. 213 ff.
Greco, Sara
2017. Using Argumentative Tools to Understand Inner Dialogue.
Argumentation 31:2 ► pp. 331 ff.
Greco, Sara
2018. Frans H. van Eemeren and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans: Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation.
Argumentation 32:1 ► pp. 151 ff.
Greco, Sara
2021. Review of Brambilla (2020): The quest for argumentative equivalence. Argumentative patterns in political interpreting contexts.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:3 ► pp. 418 ff.
Greco, Sara, Sara Cigada & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria
2022. The naming of emotions in dispute mediators’ strategic manoeuvring: a case study using a French language corpus.
Text & Talk 0:0
Greco, Sara & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria
2021. Mediators’ reframing as a constitutive element of a reconciliatory argumentative style.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Greco, Sara & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati
2021.
In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible,
► pp. 1 ff.
Greco, Sara & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati
2021.
In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible,
► pp. 1 ff.
Greco, Sara & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati
2022.
In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible,
► pp. 1 ff.
Greco, Sara, Teuta Mehmeti & Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont
2017. Do adult-children dialogical interactions leave space for a full development of argumentation?.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 193 ff.
Greco, Sara, Rebecca Schär, Chiara Pollaroli & Chiara Mercuri
2018. Adding a temporal dimension to the analysis of argumentative discourse:Justified reframingas a means of turning a single-issue discussion into a complex argumentative discussion.
Discourse Studies 20:6 ► pp. 726 ff.
Greco Morasso, Sara
2012. Review of van Eemeren (2009): Examining argumentation in context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 1:3 ► pp. 379 ff.
Green, Nancy L.
2017. Roosmaryn Pilgram (2015). A Doctor’s Argument by Authority
.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 271 ff.
Grigorov, Diyan Nikolov & A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2019. Hypothetical Questions as Strategic Devices in Negotiation.
Negotiation Journal 35:3 ► pp. 363 ff.
Groarke, Leo
2017.
In Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres [Argumentation in Context, 14],
► pp. 82 ff.
Gâţă, Anca
2017.
In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],
► pp. 309 ff.
Gâţă, Anca
2017. Ahmed Omar (2016). Strategic Maneuvering in Supporting the Feasibility of Political Change. A Pragma-Dialectical
Analysis of Egyptian Anti-regime Columns
.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 254 ff.
Gâţă, Anca
2017. Strategic maneuvering with presentational choices in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 137 ff.
Gâță, Anca
2021. Characteristics of a detached argumentative style in public policy analysis.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 46 ff.
Haaften, Ton van
2014. Review of Ihnen Jory (2012): Pragmatic argumentation in law-making debates. Instruments for the analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation at the Second Reading of the British Parliament.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:3 ► pp. 333 ff.
Haaften, Ton van & Maarten van Leeuwen
2021. On the relation between argumentative style and linguistic style.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
Hansson, Sten
2018. Analysing opposition–government blame games: argument models and strategic maneuvering.
Critical Discourse Studies 15:3 ► pp. 228 ff.
Hansson, Sten
2018. Defensive semiotic strategies in government: a multimodal study of blame avoidance.
Social Semiotics 28:4 ► pp. 472 ff.
Heiss, Sarah N. & Benjamin R. Bates
2016. When a Spoonful of Fallacies Helps the Sweetener Go Down: The Corn Refiner Association’s Use of Straw-Person Arguments in Health Debates Surrounding High-Fructose Corn Syrup.
Health Communication 31:8 ► pp. 1029 ff.
Herman, Thierry & Steve Oswald
2021.
In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36],
► pp. 305 ff.
Hernández, Alfonso
2021. Journalists’ moves in political press conferences and their implications for accountability.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:3 ► pp. 281 ff.
Hitchcock, David
2017.
In On Reasoning and Argument [Argumentation Library, 30],
► pp. 335 ff.
Hoppmann, Michael
2017. Competition and conflict between communicative norms.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 220 ff.
Huang, Lue & Chuanrui Zhang
2019. Review: Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres.
Argumentation 33:3 ► pp. 455 ff.
Iannaccone, Antonio & Francesco Arcidiacono
2017.
In Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts,
► pp. 201 ff.
Ieţcu-Fairclough, Isabela
2014. Review of Andone (2013): Argumentation in political interviews. Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:3 ► pp. 325 ff.
Ihnen Jory, Constanza
2016. Negotiation and Deliberation: Grasping the Difference.
Argumentation 30:2 ► pp. 145 ff.
Ilchenko, Olga & Natalia Kramar
2020. ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES: KEEPING UP WITH THE TIMES.
Studia Linguistica :16 ► pp. 40 ff.
Ilie, Cornelia
2017.
In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10],
► pp. 73 ff.
Impedovo, Maria Antonietta, Alice Delserieys-Pedregosa, Corinne Jégou & Konstantinos Ravanis
2017. Shadow Formation at Preschool from a Socio-materiality Perspective.
Research in Science Education 47:3 ► pp. 579 ff.
Jackson, Sally
2015. Design Thinking in Argumentation Theory and Practice.
Argumentation 29:3 ► pp. 243 ff.
Jackson, Sally
2018. Frans H. van Eemeren and Wu Peng (eds): Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics.
Argumentation 32:2 ► pp. 293 ff.
Jacquin, Jérôme
2017.
In Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres [Argumentation in Context, 14],
► pp. 240 ff.
Jacquin, Jérôme & Marta Zampa
2016. Do we still need an army like in the First World War? An argumentative analysis of a television debate on abolishing compulsory military service in Switzerland.
Discourse & Communication 10:5 ► pp. 479 ff.
Jakaza, Ernest
2019.
In Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ],
► pp. 97 ff.
Jakaza, Ernest & Marianna Visser
2016. ‘Subjectivity’ in newspaper reports on ‘controversial’ and ‘emotional’ debates: An appraisal and controversy analysis.
Language Matters 47:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Jakaza, Ernest & Marianna W. Visser
2016.
In Political Discourse in Emergent, Fragile, and Failed Democracies [Advances in Electronic Government, Digital Divide, and Regional Development, ],
► pp. 126 ff.
Jansen, Henrike
2017.
In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],
► pp. 193 ff.
Jansen, Henrike
2017. The space for strategic manoeuvring in adjudicating a freedom of speech case in the Netherlands.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 105 ff.
Jansen, Henrike
2017. “You Think That Says a Lot, but Really it Says Nothing”: An Argumentative and Linguistic Account of an Idiomatic Expression Functioning as a Presentational Device.
Argumentation 31:4 ► pp. 615 ff.
Jansen, Henrike
2020. “The people want it”.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:3 ► pp. 342 ff.
Jansen, Henrike & Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2021.
In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36],
► pp. 285 ff.
Jansen, Henrike & Maarten van Leeuwen
2021. The presentational dimension of Geert Wilders’s populist argumentative style.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
Jansen, Henrike & Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2020. Argumentative Use and Strategic Function of the Expression ‘Not for Nothing’.
Argumentation 34:2 ► pp. 143 ff.
Johnson, Ralph H. & Christopher W. Tindale
2013. Introduction.
Philosophy & Rhetoric 46:4 ► pp. 379 ff.
Juthe, André
2019. Reconstructing Complex Pro/Con Argumentation.
Argumentation 33:3 ► pp. 413 ff.
Karnieli-Miller, Orit & Galit Neufeld-Kroszynski
2018. The potential of argumentation theory in enhancing patient-centered care in breaking bad news
encounters.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:2 ► pp. 120 ff.
Kharmandar, Mohammad Ali
2016. Argumentation-based literary translation quality assessment.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:2 ► pp. 139 ff.
Kienpointner, Manfred
2001.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Kienpointner, Manfred
2005.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Kienpointner, Manfred
2012.
In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 22],
► pp. 111 ff.
Kienpointner, Manfred
2017.
In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10],
► pp. 99 ff.
Kienpointner, Manfred
2019. Kati Hannken-Illjes: Argumentation. Einführung in die Theorie und Analyse der Argumentation. Narr/Francke/Attempto: Tübingen, 2018, 193 pp.
Argumentation 33:1 ► pp. 147 ff.
Kienpointner, Manfred
2021. Review of van Eemeren (2018): Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:2 ► pp. 262 ff.
Kienpointner, Manfred
2021. The pen is mightier than the sword.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9:2 ► pp. 215 ff.
Kienpointner, Manfred
2022.
In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],
► pp. 1159 ff.
Kienpointner, Manfred
2022.
Viva la libertà!
.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:1 ► pp. 110 ff.
Kjeldsen, Jens E.
2015. The Study of Visual and Multimodal Argumentation.
Argumentation 29:2 ► pp. 115 ff.
Kloosterhuis, Harm
2013.
In Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives [Law and Philosophy Library, 102],
► pp. 71 ff.
Kloosterhuis, Harm
2013. The Logic of Indirect Insulting in Legal Discussions: A Speech Act Perspective.
SSRN Electronic Journal
Kloosterhuis, Harm
2014. Institutional Constraints of Topical Strategic Maneuvering in Legal Argumentation: The Case of Insultingg.
SSRN Electronic Journal
Kloosterhuis, Harm
2015.
In Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation [Law and Philosophy Library, 112],
► pp. 67 ff.
Krabbe, Erik C. W. & Jan Albert van Laar
2011. The Ways of Criticism.
Argumentation 25:2 ► pp. 199 ff.
Kwon, Winston, Ian Clarke & Ruth Wodak
2014. Micro-Level Discursive Strategies for Constructing Shared Views around Strategic Issues in Team Meetings.
Journal of Management Studies 51:2 ► pp. 265 ff.
Labrie, Nanon
2012. Strategic Maneuvering in Treatment Decision-Making Discussions: Two Cases in Point.
Argumentation 26:2 ► pp. 171 ff.
Labrie, Nanon
2019. “Doctor, I disagree”.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:3 ► pp. 336 ff.
Labrie, Nanon & Peter J. Schulz
2014. Does Argumentation Matter? A Systematic Literature Review on the Role of Argumentation in Doctor–Patient Communication.
Health Communication 29:10 ► pp. 996 ff.
Lauwers, Jeroen, Tom Deneire & David Eelbode
2015. The question of literary quality.
Scientific Study of Literature 5:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Lavalette, Kiki Y. Renardel de, Corina Andone & Gerard J. Steen
2019. Figurative analogies and how they are resisted in British Public Bill Committee debates.
Metaphor and the Social World 9:1 ► pp. 107 ff.
Lawrence, John, Jacky Visser, Chris Reed, Randy Allen Harris & Chrysanne Di Marco
2017. Harnessing rhetorical figures for argument mining.
Argument & Computation 8:3 ► pp. 289 ff.
Leal, Fernando
2016. Review of: Frans H. van Eemeren (2015): Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics, Cham (CH), Springer (= Argumentation Library, 27), 880 pp..
Argumentation 30:4 ► pp. 527 ff.
Leal, Fernando
2019.
In Argumentation in Actual Practice [Argumentation in Context, 17],
► pp. 299 ff.
Leal, Fernando
2019. On philosophical argumentation.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Leal, Fernando
2020. Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild: A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory.
Argumentation 34:3 ► pp. 389 ff.
Leal, Fernando
2020. On the Importance of Questioning Within the Ideal Model of Critical Discussion.
Argumentation 34:4 ► pp. 405 ff.
Leal, Fernando
2022. Is Natural Selection in Trouble? When Emotions Run High in a Philosophical Debate.
Argumentation 36:4 ► pp. 541 ff.
Leal, Fernando & Hubert Marraud
2022.
In How Philosophers Argue [Argumentation Library, 41],
► pp. 21 ff.
Leal, Fernando & Hubert Marraud
2022.
In How Philosophers Argue [Argumentation Library, 41],
► pp. 347 ff.
Leal, Fernando & Hubert Marraud
2022.
In How Philosophers Argue [Argumentation Library, 41],
► pp. 437 ff.
Lecompte-Van Poucke, Margo
2021. The value of a pragma-functional approach to intercultural conflict discourses.
Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 3:1 ► pp. 130 ff.
Lewiński, Marcin
2010. Collective Argumentative Criticism in Informal Online Discussion Forums.
Argumentation and Advocacy 47:2 ► pp. 86 ff.
Lewiński, Marcin
2011. Towards a Critique-Friendly Approach to the Straw Man Fallacy Evaluation.
Argumentation 25:4 ► pp. 469 ff.
Lewiński, Marcin
2014. Argumentative Polylogues: Beyond Dialectical Understanding of Fallacies.
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36:1 ► pp. 193 ff.
Lewiński, Marcin
2015.
In Argumentation in Political Deliberation [Benjamins Current Topics, 76],
► pp. 151 ff.
Lewiński, Marcin
2016. Shale gas debate in Europe: Pro-and-con dialectics and argumentative polylogues.
Discourse & Communication 10:6 ► pp. 553 ff.
Lewiński, Marcin & Mark Aakhus
2014. Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry.
Argumentation 28:2 ► pp. 161 ff.
Lind, Judith
2019. The rights of intended children: The best interests of the child argument in assisted reproduction policy.
Childhood 26:3 ► pp. 352 ff.
Linqiong, Yan
2017.
In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],
► pp. 281 ff.
Linqiong, Yan
2017. A pragma-dialectical approach to governmental crisis communication.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:3 ► pp. 315 ff.
Livnat, Zohar
2016. Review of Popa (2016): Thought Experiments in Academic Communication. A Pragma-Dialectical Method for Reconstructing the Argumentative Use of Imaginary Scenarios in Academic Disputes.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:3 ► pp. 348 ff.
Lukianova, Ekaterina & Timothy Steffensmeier
2020. “Well, in the case of my mom…”.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:3 ► pp. 315 ff.
López, Federico E.
2020.
In From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild [Argumentation Library, 35],
► pp. 63 ff.
Macagno, Fabrizio
2013. Strategies of Character Attack.
Argumentation 27:4 ► pp. 369 ff.
Macagno, Fabrizio
2014. Manipulating Emotions: Value-Based Reasoning and Emotive Language.
Argumentation and Advocacy 51:2 ► pp. 103 ff.
Macagno, Fabrizio & Sarah Bigi
2020. Analyzing dialogue moves in chronic care communication.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
Macagno, Fabrizio & Rosalice Botelho Wakim Souza Pinto
2021. Reconstructing Multimodal Arguments in Advertisements: Combining Pragmatics and Argumentation Theory.
Argumentation 35:1 ► pp. 141 ff.
Macagno, Fabrizio & Douglas Walton
2017.
In Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 14],
► pp. 143 ff.
Marraud, Hubert
2018. Arguments from Ostension.
Argumentation 32:3 ► pp. 309 ff.
Martins, Marina & Fabrizio Macagno
2022. An analytical instrument for coding and assessing argumentative dialogues in science teaching contexts.
Science Education 106:3 ► pp. 573 ff.
Mazzi, Davide
2014. “Our reading would lead to…”.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:2 ► pp. 103 ff.
Mazzi, Davide
2022. The Irish Public Discourse on Covid-19 at the Intersection of Legislation, Fake News and Judicial Argumentation.
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 35:3 ► pp. 1233 ff.
Mercier, Hugo
2012. Looking for Arguments.
Argumentation 26:3 ► pp. 305 ff.
Migdalek, Maia Julieta, Celia Renata Rosemberg & Cristian Santibáñez Yáñez
2015. La Génesis de la Argumentación. Un Estudio con Niños de 3 a 5 Años en Distintos Contextos de Juego.
Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura 19:3
Miserez-Caperos, Céline
2019. Francesco Arcidiacono & Antonio Bova (2017). Interpersonal argumentation in educational and professional
contexts
.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:3 ► pp. 392 ff.
Mohammed, Dima
2016. Goals in Argumentation: A Proposal for the Analysis and Evaluation of Public Political Arguments.
Argumentation 30:3 ► pp. 221 ff.
Mohammed, Dima
2018.
In Argumentation and Language — Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations [Argumentation Library, 32],
► pp. 243 ff.
Mohammed, Dima
2019. Standing Standpoints and Argumentative Associates: What is at Stake in a Public Political Argument?.
Argumentation 33:3 ► pp. 307 ff.
Morasso, Sara Greco
2012. Contextual frames and their argumentative implications: A case study in media argumentation.
Discourse Studies 14:2 ► pp. 197 ff.
Msagalla, Brighton & Marianna Visser
2021. Agenda-setting through topic shift in Tanzanian parliamentary debate: The derailment of strategic manoeuvring.
Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 39:4 ► pp. 327 ff.
Musi, Elena & Mark Aakhus
2018. Discovering Argumentative Patterns in Energy Polylogues: A Macroscope for Argument Mining.
Argumentation 32:3 ► pp. 397 ff.
Mădroane, Irina Diana
2019.
In Argumentation in Actual Practice [Argumentation in Context, 17],
► pp. 33 ff.
Na, Yang
2017. Strategic maneuvering by persuasive definition in corporate crisis communication.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:3 ► pp. 344 ff.
Navarro, María G.
2020. Emergencia del institucionalismo en la teoría argumental.
Azafea: Revista de Filosofía 22:1 ► pp. 167 ff.
Nettel, Ana Laura & Georges Roque
2012. Introduction.
Argumentation 26:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Niño, Douglas & Danny Marrero
2015.
In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 28],
► pp. 53 ff.
Novak, Marko
2020. Multi-modal argumentation and rhetoric in judicial proceedings.
Argumentation and Advocacy 56:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
Okuda, Hiroko & Takeshi Suzuki
2018. Prime Minister Abe’s challenge to the Japanese Postwar Constitution.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:1 ► pp. 18 ff.
Olayinka Unuabonah, Foluke
2020. Argumentation in Nigerian investigative public hearings.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:2 ► pp. 199 ff.
Omar, Ahmed Abdulhameed
2019. The strategic use of argumentation from example in re-evaluating a people.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:2 ► pp. 214 ff.
Oswald, Steve, Sara Greco, Johanna Miecznikowski, Chiara Pollaroli & Andrea Rocci
2020. Argumentation and meaning.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Oswald, Steve & Thierry Herman
2020.
In From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild [Argumentation Library, 35],
► pp. 41 ff.
Oswald, Steve, Thierry Herman & Jérôme Jacquin
2018.
In Argumentation and Language — Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations [Argumentation Library, 32],
► pp. 1 ff.
Paglieri, Fabio & Cristiano Castelfranchi
2014. Trust, relevance, and arguments.
Argument & Computation 5:2-3 ► pp. 216 ff.
Paglieri, Fabio & Chris Reed
2017. Introduction: Theoretical and Technological Perspectives on Online Arguments.
Philosophy & Technology 30:2 ► pp. 131 ff.
Paliewicz, Nicholas S. & George F. (Guy) McHendry
2017. When good arguments do not work: post-dialectics, argument assemblages, and the networks of climate skepticism.
Argumentation and Advocacy 53:4 ► pp. 287 ff.
Palmieri, Rudi
2017.
In The Handbook of Financial Communication and Investor Relations,
► pp. 45 ff.
Palmieri, Rudi & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati
2016. Multiple Audiences as Text Stakeholders: A Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Complex Rhetorical Situations.
Argumentation 30:4 ► pp. 467 ff.
Palmieri, Rudi & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati
2017. Practical reasoning in corporate communication with multiple audiences.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
Palmieri, Rudi & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati
2021. Strategic Communication with Multiple Audiences: Polyphony, Text Stakeholders, and Argumentation.
International Journal of Strategic Communication 15:3 ► pp. 159 ff.
Palmieri, Rudi, Chiara Mercuri & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati
2022. Persuasive Reasons in Crowdfunding Campaigns: Comparing Argumentative Strategies in Successful and Unsuccessful Projects on Kickstarter.
International Journal of Strategic Communication 16:2 ► pp. 332 ff.
Palmieri, Rudi & Johanna Miecznikowski
2016. Predictions in economic-financial news.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:1 ► pp. 48 ff.
Palmieri, Rudi & Eddo Rigotti
2014. Suspicion as an argumentative move.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:3 ► pp. 287 ff.
Pan, Dawei
2018. “Doctors Killed My Baby”: Argumentative Patterns in Medical Disputes in China.
Health Communication 33:10 ► pp. 1267 ff.
Pan, Dawei, Yanjin Chen & Shier Ju
2018. Argumentative Patterns in Chinese Medical Consultations.
Argumentation 32:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Peng, Wu
2017.
In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],
Peng, Wu
2017.
In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],
► pp. 225 ff.
Peng, Wu
2017. Strategic maneuvering by personal attacks in spokespersons’ argumentative replies at diplomatic press conferences.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:3 ► pp. 285 ff.
Peng, Wu & Xu Cihua
2017. Argumentative discourse in contemporary China.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:3 ► pp. 277 ff.
Pilgram, Roosmaryn
2017.
In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],
► pp. 109 ff.
Pilgram, Roosmaryn & Lotte van Poppel
2021.
In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36],
► pp. 191 ff.
Pinchao, Lu
2017. Wu Peng. (2017). Discourse and trade dispute: A discourse-analytic research on Sino-US trade disputes over tire imports
.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:3 ► pp. 381 ff.
Plug, H José
2010. Institutional Boundaries on the Evaluation of Argumentation in Legislative Discussions.
Legisprudence 4:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Plug, H. José
2017.
In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10],
► pp. 217 ff.
Plug, H. José
2019. Challenging judicial impartiality.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:2 ► pp. 245 ff.
Poggi, Isabella, Francesca D’Errico, Laura Vincze & Alessandro Vinciarelli
2013.
In Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social Action [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7688],
► pp. 1 ff.
Pollaroli, Chiara & Andrea Rocci
2015. The argumentative relevance of pictorial and multimodal metaphor in advertising.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 4:2 ► pp. 158 ff.
Polyzou, Alexandra
2015. PRESUPPOSITION IN DISCOURSE.
Critical Discourse Studies 12:2 ► pp. 123 ff.
Popa, Eugen
2013. Review of Suzuki, Kato, Kubota & Murai (2012): Proceedings of the 4th Tokyo Conference on Argumentation.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 2:3 ► pp. 346 ff.
Popa, Eugen Octav, Vincent Blok & Renate Wesselink
2021. An Agonistic Approach to Technological Conflict.
Philosophy & Technology 34:4 ► pp. 717 ff.
Prata, Maria José, Bruno de Sousa, Isabel Festas & Albertina L. Oliveira
2019. Cooperative methods and self-regulated strategies development for argumentative writing.
The Journal of Educational Research 112:1 ► pp. 12 ff.
Pruś, Jakub
2021. How Can Modifications of Meaning Influence Argumentation? The Concept and Typology of Semantic Arguments.
Argumentation 35:3 ► pp. 483 ff.
Raccah, Pierre-Yves
2015.
In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 28],
► pp. 279 ff.
Reijven, Menno H.
2021. The co-construction of campaign argumentation on U.S.A. late-night talk shows.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:3 ► pp. 397 ff.
Renardel de Lavalette, Kiki Yvonne, Corina Andone & Gerard J. Steen
2019. I did not say that the government should be plundering anybody’s savings.
Journal of Language and Politics 18:5 ► pp. 718 ff.
Ribeiro, Henrique Jales
2014.
In Systematic Approaches to Argument by Analogy [Argumentation Library, 25],
► pp. 275 ff.
Rigotti, Eddo
2014. Review of van Eemeren & Garssen (2012): Exploring Argumentative Contexts.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:2 ► pp. 199 ff.
Rigotti, Eddo
2014. The Nature and Functions of Loci in Agricola’s De Inuentione Dialectica.
Argumentation 28:1 ► pp. 19 ff.
Rigotti, Eddo & Sara Greco
2019.
In Inference in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 34],
► pp. 59 ff.
Rigotti, Eddo & Sara Greco
2019.
In Inference in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 34],
► pp. 169 ff.
Rigotti, Eddo & Sara Greco
2019.
In Inference in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 34],
► pp. 247 ff.
Rocci, Andrea
2017.
In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29],
► pp. 1 ff.
Rocci, Andrea
2017.
In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29],
► pp. 33 ff.
Rocci, Andrea
2017.
In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29],
► pp. 105 ff.
Rocci, Andrea
2017.
In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29],
► pp. 197 ff.
Rocci, Andrea
2017.
In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29],
► pp. 275 ff.
Rocci, Andrea
2017.
In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29],
► pp. 371 ff.
Rocci, Andrea & Margherita Luciani
2016. Economic-financial journalists as argumentative intermediaries.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:1 ► pp. 88 ff.
Rocci, Andrea, Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati & Chiara Pollaroli
2018. The argumentative and rhetorical function of multimodal metonymy.
Semiotica 2018:220 ► pp. 123 ff.
Rocci, Andrea & Marta Zampa
2013. Peter A. Cramer: Controversy as News Discourse.
Argumentation 27:3 ► pp. 327 ff.
Rodgers, Elena
2016. A Rhetorical Analysis of Folk Linguistic Discourse: The Case of Twang.
American Speech 91:4 ► pp. 393 ff.
Rodrigues, Soledade, Marcin Lewiński & Mehmet Ali Üzelgün
2019. Environmental manifestoes.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:1 ► pp. 12 ff.
Roque, Georges
2012.
In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 22],
► pp. 273 ff.
Roque, Georges
2017.
In Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres [Argumentation in Context, 14],
► pp. 26 ff.
Rossini, Antonio
2020. An Early Renaissance Altarpiece by Domenico Veneziano: A Case of Visual Argumentation?.
Argumentation 34:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Rubinelli, Sara
2013. Argumentation as Rational Persuasion in Doctor-Patient Communication.
Philosophy & Rhetoric 46:4 ► pp. 550 ff.
Rubinelli, Sara, Peter J. Schulz & Uwe Hartung
2010. “Your risk is low, because …”: argument-driven online genetic counselling.
Argument & Computation 1:3 ► pp. 199 ff.
Santulli, Francesca & Chiara Degano
2022.
In Agreement in Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 31],
► pp. 1 ff.
Santulli, Francesca & Chiara Degano
2022.
In Agreement in Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 31],
► pp. 27 ff.
Santulli, Francesca & Chiara Degano
2022.
In Agreement in Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 31],
► pp. 145 ff.
Seppanen, Marita
2022. The quality of argumentation and metacognitive reflection in engineering co-Design.
European Journal of Engineering Education ► pp. 1 ff.
Siegel, Harvey
2015.
In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 28],
► pp. 205 ff.
Sijadu, Zameka Paula
2020. Metaphors as strategic manoeuvring in isiXhosa traditional argumentative political discourse.
South African Journal of African Languages 40:2 ► pp. 198 ff.
Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. & J. H. M. Wagemans
2015.
In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 28],
► pp. 217 ff.
Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca
2017.
In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],
► pp. 269 ff.
Sorlin, Sandrine
2016.
In Language and Manipulation in House of Cards,
► pp. 1 ff.
Sorlin, Sandrine
2016.
In Language and Manipulation in House of Cards,
► pp. 107 ff.
Spranzi, Marta
2012.
In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 22],
► pp. 163 ff.
Stevens, Katharina
2019. The Roles We Make Others Take: Thoughts on the Ethics of Arguing.
Topoi 38:4 ► pp. 693 ff.
Stevens, Katharina & Daniel H. Cohen
2021. Angelic Devil’s Advocates and the Forms of Adversariality.
Topoi 40:5 ► pp. 899 ff.
Svačinová, Iva
2021. Demosthenes’ strategic maneuvering in the First Olynthiac
.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:3 ► pp. 315 ff.
Svačinová, Iva
2021. Pragma-Dialectical Reconstruction of Crisis Diary-Writing as a Communicative Activity Type.
Argumentation 35:2 ► pp. 237 ff.
Svačinová, Iva
2022. Three forms of internal negotiation through the activity of private diary-writing.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:2 ► pp. 243 ff.
Tribastone, Miriam & Sara Greco
2018.
In Empirical Research on Semiotics and Visual Rhetoric [Advances in Multimedia and Interactive Technologies, ],
► pp. 71 ff.
Tseronis, Assimakis
2013. Review of Fairclough & Fairclough (2012): Political discourse analysis. A method for advanced students.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 2:2 ► pp. 269 ff.
Tseronis, Assimakis
2017.
In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],
► pp. 335 ff.
Tseronis, Assimakis
2018. Multimodal argumentation: Beyond the verbal/visual divide.
Semiotica 2018:220 ► pp. 41 ff.
Tseronis, Assimakis
2021.
In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36],
► pp. 167 ff.
Tseronis, Assimakis
2022. Use and abuse of the strategic function of in fact and frankly when qualifying a standpoint.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 473 ff.
Tuzet, Giovanni
2015.
In Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation [Law and Philosophy Library, 112],
► pp. 37 ff.
Uzelgun, Mehmet Ali, Dima Mohammed, Marcin Lewiński & Paula Castro
2015. Managing disagreement throughyes, but… constructions: An argumentative analysis.
Discourse Studies 17:4 ► pp. 467 ff.
van Bijnen, Emma & Sara Greco
2018. Divide to unite.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:3 ► pp. 285 ff.
van den Hoven, Paul
2012.
In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 22],
► pp. 257 ff.
van den Hoven, Paul
2012. E. Feteris, B. Garssen and F. Snoeck Henkemans (eds): Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics. In Honor of Frans H. van Eemeren.
Argumentation 26:3 ► pp. 409 ff.
van den Hoven, Paul
2017.
In Narration as Argument [Argumentation Library, 31],
► pp. 103 ff.
van den Hoven, Paul
2018. Discussing discourse modalities in argument theory: Reconsidering a paradigm
.
Semiotica 2018:220 ► pp. 19 ff.
van den Hoven, Paul & Ying Yang
2013. The Argumentative Reconstruction of Multimodal Discourse, Taking the ABC Coverage of President Hu Jintao’s Visit to the USA as an Example.
Argumentation 27:4 ► pp. 403 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels
2015.
In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27],
► pp. 759 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2011. In Context.
Argumentation 25:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2012. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory Under Discussion.
Argumentation 26:4 ► pp. 439 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2013. In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.
Argumentation 27:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015.
In Argumentation in Political Deliberation [Benjamins Current Topics, 76],
► pp. 11 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015.
In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27],
► pp. 31 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015.
In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27],
► pp. 127 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015.
In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27],
► pp. 181 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015.
In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27],
► pp. 223 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015.
In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27],
► pp. 521 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015.
In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27],
► pp. 645 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015.
In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27],
► pp. 667 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015.
In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 28],
► pp. 3 ff.
Van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015.
In The International Encyclopedia of Communication,
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015.
In The International Encyclopedia of Communication,
► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2016. Identifying Argumentative Patterns: A Vital Step in the Development of Pragma-Dialectics.
Argumentation 30:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2017.
In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],
► pp. 11 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2017.
In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],
► pp. 37 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2017.
In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],
► pp. 123 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2017.
In Prototypical Argumentative Patterns [Argumentation in Context, 11],
► pp. 7 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2017.
In Prototypical Argumentative Patterns [Argumentation in Context, 11],
► pp. 157 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2017. Context-dependency of argumentative patterns in discourse.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2018.
In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33],
► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2018.
In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33],
► pp. 19 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2018.
In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33],
► pp. 33 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2018.
In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33],
► pp. 71 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2018.
In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33],
► pp. 89 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2018.
In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33],
► pp. 111 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2018.
In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33],
► pp. 129 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2018. Commentary on “The role of argumentative strategies in the construction of emergent common ground in a patient-centered approach to the medical encounter”.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:2 ► pp. 157 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2019. Argumentative Style: A Complex Notion.
Argumentation 33:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2022. Characterising an MEP’s argumentative style.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:1 ► pp. 6 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2013.
In Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 1],
► pp. 515 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2014.
In Systematic Approaches to Argument by Analogy [Argumentation Library, 25],
► pp. 41 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2015.
In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27],
► pp. 275 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2015.
In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27],
► pp. 469 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2015.
In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27],
► pp. 861 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2016.
In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 4],
► pp. 447 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2019.
In Argumentation in Actual Practice [Argumentation in Context, 17],
► pp. 321 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2020.
In From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild [Argumentation Library, 35],
► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013.
In Handbook of Argumentation Theory,
► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013.
In Handbook of Argumentation Theory,
► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013.
In Handbook of Argumentation Theory,
► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013.
In Handbook of Argumentation Theory,
► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013.
In Handbook of Argumentation Theory,
► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013.
In Handbook of Argumentation Theory,
► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014.
In Handbook of Argumentation Theory,
► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014.
In Handbook of Argumentation Theory,
► pp. 141 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014.
In Handbook of Argumentation Theory,
► pp. 257 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014.
In Handbook of Argumentation Theory,
► pp. 301 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014.
In Handbook of Argumentation Theory,
► pp. 517 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014.
In Handbook of Argumentation Theory,
► pp. 677 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels
2012.
In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 22],
► pp. 323 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels
2012. Effectiveness Through Reasonableness Preliminary Steps to Pragma-Dialectical Effectiveness Research.
Argumentation 26:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels
2012. The disguisedabusive ad hominemempirically investigated: Strategic manoeuvring with direct personal attacks.
Thinking & Reasoning 18:3 ► pp. 344 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels
2015.
In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27],
► pp. 773 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels
2015.
In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27],
► pp. 795 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels
2015.
In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27],
► pp. 815 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Peter Houtlosser
2015.
In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27],
► pp. 381 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Sally Jackson & Scott Jacobs
2015.
In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27],
► pp. 3 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Wu Peng
2017.
In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],
► pp. 1 ff.
van Haaften, Ton
2017.
In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],
► pp. 177 ff.
van Laar, Jan Albert
2014. Criticism in Need of Clarification.
Argumentation 28:4 ► pp. 401 ff.
van Laar, Jan Albert
2021.
In Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate ,
► pp. 87 ff.
van Laar, Jan Albert & Erik C. W. Krabbe
2018. The Role of Argument in Negotiation.
Argumentation 32:4 ► pp. 549 ff.
van Laar, Jan Albert & Erik C.W. Krabbe
2016. Fair and unfair strategies in public controversies.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:3 ► pp. 315 ff.
van Poppel, Lotte
2017.
In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],
► pp. 93 ff.
van Poppel, Lotte
2018. Commentary on “Implicit persuasion in medical decision-making: an overview of implicitly steering behaviors and a reflection on explanations for the use of implicitly steering behaviors”.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:2 ► pp. 228 ff.
van Poppel, Lotte
2021. The Study of Metaphor in Argumentation Theory.
Argumentation 35:1 ► pp. 177 ff.
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2015. Identity as a resource to shape mediation in dialogic interaction.
Language and Dialogue 5:3 ► pp. 355 ff.
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2017. Strategic maneuvering in dispute mediation.
Argumentation and Advocacy 53:3 ► pp. 234 ff.
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2021. Constructing disagreement space.
Language and Dialogue 11:3 ► pp. 379 ff.
Verhagen, Arie
2021.
In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36],
► pp. 37 ff.
Visser, Jacky
2017. Speech Acts in a Dialogue Game Formalisation of Critical Discussion.
Argumentation 31:2 ► pp. 245 ff.
Visser, Jacky, John Lawrence, Chris Reed, Jean Wagemans & Douglas Walton
2021. Annotating Argument Schemes.
Argumentation 35:1 ► pp. 101 ff.
Wagemans, Jean H. M.
2011. The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion.
Argumentation 25:3 ► pp. 329 ff.
Wagemans, Jean H. M.
2018. Commentary on “The potential of argumentation theory in enhancing patient-centered care in breaking bad news encounters”.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:2 ► pp. 138 ff.
Walton, Douglas
2014. Speech Acts and Indirect Threats in Ad Baculum Arguments. A Reply to Budzynska and Witek.
Argumentation 28:3 ► pp. 317 ff.
Walton, Douglas
2015. Profiles of Dialogue: A Method of Argument Fault Diagnosis and Repair.
Argumentation and Advocacy 52:2 ► pp. 91 ff.
Walton, Douglas & Marcin Koszowy
2017. Arguments from authority and expert opinion in computational argumentation systems.
AI & SOCIETY 32:4 ► pp. 483 ff.
Walton, Douglas & Giovanni Sartor
2013. Teleological Justification of Argumentation Schemes.
Argumentation 27:2 ► pp. 111 ff.
Warglien, Massimo & Peter Gärdenfors
2015.
In Applications of Conceptual Spaces [Synthese Library, 359],
► pp. 79 ff.
Weigand, Edda
2018.
In From Pragmatics to Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 31],
► pp. 5 ff.
Wierda, Renske & Jacky Visser
2017.
In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],
► pp. 77 ff.
Wildfeuer, Janina & Joseph Adika Coffie
2022. #socialiseresponsibly. Analyzing the Rhetorical Structure of Heineken TV Commercials During the Pandemic.
Frontiers in Communication 7
Wildfeuer, Janina & Chiara Pollaroli
2017.
In Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres [Argumentation in Context, 14],
► pp. 190 ff.
Wodak, Ruth
2016.
In The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication,
► pp. 1 ff.
Wodak, Ruth
2016. Dialogue matters: transcending dichotomies.
Journal of Multicultural Discourses 11:4 ► pp. 367 ff.
Wu, Peng
2018. Frans H. van Eemeren: Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.
Argumentation 32:4 ► pp. 609 ff.
Wu, Peng
2019.
In Argumentation in Actual Practice [Argumentation in Context, 17],
► pp. 61 ff.
Wu, Peng
2019. Confrontational Maneuvering by Dissociation in Spokespersons’ Argumentative Replies at the Press Conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Argumentation 33:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Wu, Peng
2019. “I Have No Comment”: Confrontational Maneuvering by Declaring a Standpoint Unallowed or Indisputable in Spokespersons’ Argumentative Replies at the Regular Press Conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Argumentation 33:4 ► pp. 489 ff.
Wu, Peng
2021. The uncompromising confrontational argumentative style of the spokespersons’ replies at the regular press conferences of
China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 26 ff.
Xenitidou, Maria & Sara Greco Morasso
2014. Parental discourse and identity management in the talk of indigenous and migrant speakers.
Discourse & Society 25:1 ► pp. 100 ff.
Xiong, Minghui & Linqiong Yan
2019. Mencius’s Strategies of Political Argumentation.
Argumentation 33:3 ► pp. 365 ff.
Yan, Lin-qiong & Xiong Ming‑hui
2019. Refutational Strategies in Mencius’s Argumentative Discourse on Human Nature.
Argumentation 33:4 ► pp. 541 ff.
Ylä-Anttila, Tuukka
2018. Populist knowledge: ‘Post-truth’ repertoires of contesting epistemic authorities.
European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 5:4 ► pp. 356 ff.
Yu, Shiyang & Frank Zenker
2018. Peirce Knew Why Abduction Isn’t IBE—A Scheme and Critical Questions for Abductive Argument.
Argumentation 32:4 ► pp. 569 ff.
Zarefsky, David
2012. A Challenge and an Opportunity for Argumentation Studies.
Argumentation and Advocacy 48:3 ► pp. 175 ff.
Zarefsky, David
2014.
In Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 24],
► pp. 253 ff.
Zarefsky, David
2019.
In The Practice of Argumentation,
Zenker, Frank
2013. What Do Normative Approaches to Argumentation Stand to Gain from Rhetorical Insights?.
Philosophy & Rhetoric 46:4 ► pp. 415 ff.
Zhang, Chuanrui & Cihua Xu
2018. Argument by Multimodal Metaphor as Strategic Maneuvering in TV Commercials: A Case Study.
Argumentation 32:4 ► pp. 501 ff.
ZHU, Lei & Wei WANG
2022. Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Nanon Labrie: argumentation between doctors and patients: understanding clinical argumentative discourse.
Argumentation
Álvares, Maria
2022. Policy discourse in times of crisis.
Journal of Language and Politics 21:5 ► pp. 742 ff.
Šorm, Ester & Gerard J. Steen
2018.
In Visual Metaphor [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 18],
► pp. 47 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 december 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects & Metadata
Communication Studies
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN015000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Rhetoric