Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation

Aakhus, Mark

2015. Deliberation digitized. In Argumentation in Political Deliberation [Benjamins Current Topics, 76], ► pp. 101 ff.

Aakhus, Mark

2017. The Communicative Work of Organizations in Shaping Argumentative Realities. Philosophy & Technology 30:2 ► pp. 191 ff.

Aakhus, Mark & Marcin Lewiński

2017. Advancing Polylogical Analysis of Large-Scale Argumentation: Disagreement Management in the Fracking Controversy. Argumentation 31:1 ► pp. 179 ff.

Adams, Brian E.

2015. Working through disagreement in deliberative forums. The Social Science Journal 52:2 ► pp. 229 ff.

Adler, Silvia, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba & S. Prévost

2018. Annonces des ’journées portes ouvertes’ : style concis et présence énonciative. SHS Web of Conferences 46 ► pp. 01016 ff.

Akkermans, Aranka, Sanne Prins, Amber S. Spijkers, Jean Wagemans, Nanon H. M. Labrie, Dick L. Willems, Marcus J. Schultz, Thomas G. V. Cherpanath, Job B. M. van Woensel, Marc van Heerde, Anton H. van Kaam, Moniek van de Loo, Anne Stiggelbout, Ellen M. A. Smets & Mirjam A. de Vos

2023. Argumentation in end-of-life conversations with families in Dutch intensive care units: a qualitative observational study. Intensive Care Medicine 49:4 ► pp. 421 ff.

Al-Duleimi, Abbas Deygan Darweesh & Waleed Ridha Hammoodi

2015. A Pragmatic Study of Strategic Maneuvering in Selected Political Interviews. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 05:01 ► pp. 79 ff.

Al-Hindawi, Fareed Hameed & Wafaa Sahib Mehdi Mohammed

2018. Towards an Analytical Model in Critical Pragmatics. SSRN Electronic Journal

Alves do Nascimento França, Hális

2022. Rethinking Interpretative Arguments. In New Developments in Legal Reasoning and Logic [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 23], ► pp. 129 ff.

Andone, Corina

2012. Review of Peters (2012): Argument and innovation. Theoretical and empirical explorations in knowledge claim evaluation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 1:3 ► pp. 387 ff.

Andone, Corina

2015. The burden of proof in dealing with political accountability. In Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 26], ► pp. 19 ff.

Andone, Corina

2015. Pragmatic Argumentation in European Practices of Political Accountability. Argumentation 29:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Andone, Corina

2016. Argumentative Patterns in the Political Domain: The Case of European Parliamentary Committees of Inquiry. Argumentation 30:1 ► pp. 45 ff.

Andone, Corina

2016. Delimiting the burden of proof in political interviews. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:1 ► pp. 74 ff.

Andone, Corina

2017. Chapter 14. Delimiting the burden of proof in political interviews. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 255 ff.

Andone, Corina

2017. Chapter 4. The role of pragmatic and majority argumentation in reports of European parliamentary committees of inquiry. In Prototypical Argumentative Patterns [Argumentation in Context, 11], ► pp. 53 ff.

Andone, Corina

2022. Crisis Response Strategies in Political Interviews: A European Union Perspective. In Adversarial Political Interviewing, ► pp. 193 ff.

Andone, Corina & Florin Coman-Kund

2017. Argumentative patterns in the European Union’s directives. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:1 ► pp. 76 ff.

Andone, Corina & Andrea Rocci

2016. Argumentation in journalism: Professional practices and the public sphere. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Andrade Uribe, Schumann Javier

2019. El argumento ad verecundiam en la relación médico-paciente: estudio de caso en procedimientos estéticos. Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación :18 ► pp. 1 ff.

Anthony Blair, J.

2021. Technical Terminology and Argument Analysis and Appraisal. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 61 ff.

Archer, Dawn, Piotr Jagodziński & Rebecca Jagodziński

2021. Activity Types and Genres. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 206 ff.

Arcidiacono, Francesco & Antonio Bova

2011. Argumentative strategies for conflict management and resolution in Italian and Swiss families. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 30 ► pp. 1385 ff.

Arroyo, José Luis Blas

2015. Pragmatics of Political Discourse. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.

Ayala, Ricardo A

2019. Twenty years of management of care in Chile: what we know, what we do not know, what is yet to come. An analysis of arguments. Medical Humanities 45:3 ► pp. 267 ff.

Barceló Aspeitia, Axel Arturo

2020. Whataboutisms and Inconsistency. Argumentation 34:4 ► pp. 433 ff.

Barebina, Natal’ya Sergeevna, Mikail Ismailovich Tagiev & Sergey Alexandrovich Tiguntsev

2020. Interpretative Component of Argumentative Constructions of Criticism in the English-Language Reviews as Explication of Assessment in Scientific Discourse. Philology. Theory & Practice 13:9 ► pp. 181 ff.

Benoit, William & Jennifer M. Benoit-Bryan

2014. A functional analysis of the 2010 Australian Prime Minister debate. Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:2 ► pp. 153 ff.

Bermejo-Luque, Lilian

2017. Chapter 3. Argumentative and non-argumentative rhetorical content. In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10], ► pp. 57 ff.

Bilstrup Finsen, Andreas, Gerard J. Steen & Jean H. M. Wagemans

2021. How do scientists criticize the computer metaphor of the brain?. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:2 ► pp. 171 ff.

Bjaiya al-mas'ud, Hameed Hassoon & Abdullah Muhammad Naif

2020. Deception in American Propaganda: A Pragma-Rhetorical Perspective. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities 27:10 ► pp. 34 ff.

Bletsas, Marina

2022. Paroemiological argumentation in Italian and French journalistic discourse. Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:2 ► pp. 180 ff.

Boer, Lianne J. M.

2021. International Law As We Know It,

Bogaards, Maarten

2021. “Completely impartial opinion, okay?”. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:3 ► pp. 368 ff.

Boogaart, Ronny

2020. Expressives in Argumentation: The Case of Apprehensive Straks (‘Shortly’) in Dutch. In From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild [Argumentation Library, 35], ► pp. 185 ff.

Boogaart, Ronny, Henrike Jansen & Maarten van Leeuwen

2021. Introduction: From Argumentation to Language—And Vice Versa. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 1 ff.

Boukala, Salomi

2016. Rethinking topos in the discourse historical approach: Endoxon seeking and argumentation in Greek media discourses on ‘Islamist terrorism’. Discourse Studies 18:3 ► pp. 249 ff.

Boukala, Salomi

2019. (Re)Introducing the Aristotelian Topos/Topoi in the Discourse Historical Approach: Key Methodological Concepts. In European Identity and the Representation of Islam in the Mainstream Press, ► pp. 85 ff.

Bova, Antonio

2015. “This is the cheese bought by Grandpa”. Journal of Argumentation in Context 4:2 ► pp. 133 ff.

Bova, Antonio

2017. The Role of the Teacher in Promoting Argumentative Interactions in the Learning Contexts of Higher Education. In Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts, ► pp. 75 ff.

Bova, Antonio

2020. Un estudio de los argumentos de autoridad utilizados por los padres con sus hijos durante las comidas. Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación :19 ► pp. 1 ff.

Bova, Antonio & Francesco Arcidiacono

2013. Investigating children’s Why-questions: A study comparing argumentative and explanatory function. Discourse Studies 15:6 ► pp. 713 ff.

Bova, Antonio & Francesco Arcidiacono

2013. Invoking the Authority of Feelings as a Strategic Maneuver in Family Mealtime Conversations. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 23:3 ► pp. 206 ff.

Bova, Antonio & Francesco Arcidiacono

2015. Beyond conflicts. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3:2 ► pp. 263 ff.

Brambilla, Emanuele

2015. Argumentative equivalence as the reproduction of strategic maneuvering in interpreted texts. Journal of Argumentation in Context 4:3 ► pp. 299 ff.

Brambilla, Emanuele

2017. Interpreting legal arguments. Insights from the first ICC trial . International Journal of Legal Discourse 2:2 ► pp. 177 ff.

Brambilla, Emanuele

2022. Antifascist argumentation in Giacomo Matteotti’s 1924 speech to the Italian Parliament. Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:1 ► pp. 27 ff.

Brambilla, Emanuele

2023. On the defence of antifascist Italy in Alcide De Gasperi’s 1946 speech to the Paris Peace Conference. Discourse Studies 25:4 ► pp. 473 ff.

Bura, Kateryna

2022. Місце мультимодальної арґументації в процесі ухвалення рішень. Multiversum. Philosophical almanac 1:1 ► pp. 125 ff.

Burger, Marcel & Laura Delaloye

2016. The framing of argumentation in the making of a political editorial. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:1 ► pp. 29 ff.

Byczyk, Marcin

2018. The Codification of the Polish Substantial Criminal Law in the Sejm Debates 1818. In Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity [Studies in the History of Law and Justice, 12], ► pp. 173 ff.

Carranza, Isolda E.

2015. Narrating and Arguing. In The Handbook of Narrative Analysis, ► pp. 57 ff.

Castro, Diego

2022. Argumentation in Suboptimal Settings. Argumentation 36:3 ► pp. 393 ff.

Catenaccio, Paola

2017. Chapter 9. Caught between profitability and responsibility. In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10], ► pp. 197 ff.

Chuanrui, Zhang & Xu Cihua

2017. Argument by multimodal metaphor as strategic maneuvering in video advertising. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:3 ► pp. 359 ff.

Clary-Lemon, Jennifer

2014. Irish emigration in the 1970s: The ‘problem’ discourse of political elites. Discourse & Society 25:5 ► pp. 619 ff.

Coombes, Michael & Annemaré Kotzé

2021. “Did Augustine Win?” Another Look at an Old Question about the Contra Fortunatum. Journal of Early Christian History 11:3 ► pp. 18 ff.

Coposescu, Liliana

2015. Argumentation strategies in mediated professional interactions. In Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 26], ► pp. 161 ff.

Crosswhite, James

2013. The Rhetorical Unconscious of Argumentation Theory:. Philosophy & Rhetoric 46:4 ► pp. 392 ff.

Csordás, Hédi Virág & Gábor Forrai

2018. What argumentation theory can teach us about commercials: Strategic maneuvering and the ‘tulip test’. Society and Economy 40:3 ► pp. 389 ff.

Cummings, Louise

2015. Argument from Authority. In Reasoning and Public Health: New Ways of Coping with Uncertainty, ► pp. 67 ff.

Dahl, John Magnus R.

2015. Visual argumentation in political advertising. Journal of Argumentation in Context 4:3 ► pp. 286 ff.

Danblon, Emmanuelle

2013. The Reason of Rhetoric. Philosophy & Rhetoric 46:4 ► pp. 493 ff.

de Bustos, Eduardo

2017. Parables: Crossroads Between the Cognitive Theory of Metaphor and Argumentation Theory. In Narration as Argument [Argumentation Library, 31], ► pp. 83 ff.

de Oliveira, Maria do Carmo Leite & Silvia Maura Rodrigues Pereira

2018. Formulations in Delicate Actions: A Study of Analyst Questions in Earnings Conference Calls. International Journal of Business Communication 55:3 ► pp. 293 ff.

Degano, Chiara

2014. Textuality on the Web. In Innovative Methods and Technologies for Electronic Discourse Analysis [Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology, ], ► pp. 414 ff.

Degano, Chiara

2014. USNational Security Strategy: Different presidencies, different rhetoric?. In Let's talk politics [Argumentation in Context, 6], ► pp. 149 ff.

Degano, Chiara

2016. Corpus linguistics and argumentation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:2 ► pp. 113 ff.

Degano, Chiara

2017. Chapter 12. Visual arguments in activists’ campaigns. In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10], ► pp. 291 ff.

Dello Russo, Silvia, Atieh S. Mirfakhar & Mariella Miraglia

2023. What is the narrative for practice? A review of recommendations on feedback and a guide to writing impactful practical implications. Applied Psychology 72:4 ► pp. 1624 ff.

Demir, Yeliz

2016. Maneuvering strategically in a press conference to diminish political responsibility for a critical event. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:2 ► pp. 191 ff.

Demir, Yeliz

2017. Chapter 10. Multi-participant TV debate as an argumentative activity type. In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10], ► pp. 229 ff.

DEMİR, Yeliz

2020. Patterns of Responses to Abusive Ad Hominem Attacks: The Case of Facebook News-commenting. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 37:2 ► pp. 290 ff.

Demir, Yeliz & Juliette Schaafsma

2023. Argumentative strategies to evade state apologies: The Turkish example. Discourse Studies 25:4 ► pp. 493 ff.

Doury, Marianne & Assimakis Tseronis

2015. The place of counter discourse in two methods of public deliberation. In Argumentation in Political Deliberation [Benjamins Current Topics, 76], ► pp. 75 ff.

Duerringer, Christopher M. & Z. S. Justus

2016. Tropes in the Rhetoric of Gun Rights: A Pragma-Dialectic Analysis. Argumentation and Advocacy 52:3 ► pp. 181 ff.

Eckstein, Justin

2014. Yellow Rain. Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:1 ► pp. 35 ff.

Eckstein, Justin

2017. Radiolab’s Sound Strategic Maneuvers. Argumentation 31:4 ► pp. 663 ff.

Eemeren, Frans H. van

2021. Examining argumentative style. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 8 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2011. In Context. Argumentation 25:2 ► pp. 141 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2012. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory Under Discussion. Argumentation 26:4 ► pp. 439 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2013. In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics. Argumentation 27:1 ► pp. 49 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2015. In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 31 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2015. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation Under Discussion. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 181 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2015. Bingo! Promising Developments in Argumentation Theory. In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 28], ► pp. 3 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2015. In Reasonableness. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 223 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2015. The Role of Logic in Analyzing and Evaluating Argumentation. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 667 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2015. The Pragma-Dialectical Method of Analysis and Evaluation. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 521 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2015. Strategic Maneuvering. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ► pp. 1 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2015. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse in political deliberation. In Argumentation in Political Deliberation [Benjamins Current Topics, 76], ► pp. 11 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2015. From Ideal Model of Critical Discussion to Situated Argumentative Discourse: The Step-by-Step Development of the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 127 ff.

Van Eemeren, Frans H.

2015. Rhetoric, Argument, and Persuasion. In The International Encyclopedia of Communication,

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2015. In Context Giving Contextualization Its Rightful Place in the Study of Argumentation. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 645 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2015. Fallacies as Derailments of Argumentative Discourse Acceptance Based on Understanding and Critical Assessment. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 575 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2015. Bingo! Promising Developments in Argumentation Theory. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 55 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2015. Rhetoric, Argument, and Persuasion. In The International Encyclopedia of Communication, ► pp. 1 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2016. Identifying Argumentative Patterns: A Vital Step in the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. Argumentation 30:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2017. Chapter 2. Argumentative patterns viewed from a pragma-dialectical perspective. In Prototypical Argumentative Patterns [Argumentation in Context, 11], ► pp. 7 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2017. Context-dependency of argumentative patterns in discourse. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:1 ► pp. 3 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2017. Chapter 2. In what sense do modern argumentation theories relate to Aristotle?. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 11 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2017. Chapter 10. The dependency of argumentative patterns on the institutional context. In Prototypical Argumentative Patterns [Argumentation in Context, 11], ► pp. 157 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2017. Chapter 3. Fallacies as derailments of argumentative discourse. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 37 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2017. Chapter 8. Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse in political deliberation. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 123 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2018. Descriptive Studies of Argumentative Discourse. In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33], ► pp. 71 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2018. Commentary on “The role of argumentative strategies in the construction of emergent common ground in a patient-centered approach to the medical encounter”. Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:2 ► pp. 157 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2018. A Model of a Critical Discussion. In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33], ► pp. 33 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2018. Analysis as Resolution-Oriented Reconstruction. In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33], ► pp. 89 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2018. Building a Theory of Argumentation. In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33], ► pp. 19 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2018. Argumentation Theory as a Discipline. In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33], ► pp. 1 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2018. Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse. In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33], ► pp. 111 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2018. Distinguishing Between Different Kinds of Argumentative Practices. In Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective [Argumentation Library, 33], ► pp. 129 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2019. Argumentative Style: A Complex Notion. Argumentation 33:2 ► pp. 153 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H.

2022. Characterising an MEP’s argumentative style. Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:1 ► pp. 6 ff.

Egres, Dorottya

2021. Strategic maneuvering in extended polylogues. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:2 ► pp. 145 ff.

Eriksson, Anders

2023. Apocalyptic argumentation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 12:1 ► pp. 116 ff.

Fabregat, Silvia Martínez

2016. Irony as a Visual Argument. In Epistemology, Knowledge and the Impact of Interaction [Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, 38], ► pp. 297 ff.

Fahnestock, Jeanne

2021. Analyzing Rhetorical Style: Toward Better Methods. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 79 ff.

Fairclough, Isabela

2016. Evaluating policy as argument: the public debate over the first UK austerity budget. Critical Discourse Studies 13:1 ► pp. 57 ff.

Fairclough, Isabela

2019. Deontic power and institutional contexts. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:1 ► pp. 136 ff.

Fairclough, Isabela

2020. Is “Conductive Argument” a Single Argument?. In From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild [Argumentation Library, 35], ► pp. 223 ff.

Fairclough, Isabela & Norman Fairclough

2011. Practical reasoning in political discourse: The UK government’s response to the economic crisis in the 2008 Pre-Budget Report. Discourse & Society 22:3 ► pp. 243 ff.

Fairclough, Isabela & Irina Diana Mădroane

2020. An Argumentative Approach to “Framing”. Framing, Deliberation and Action in an Environmental Conflict. Co-herencia 17:32 ► pp. 119 ff.

Fancourt, Nigel & Liam Guilfoyle

2022. Interdisciplinary perspective-taking within argumentation: students’ strategies across science and religious education. Journal of Religious Education 70:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Feng, Jieyun, Fan Zhao & Aiqing Feng

2021. Strategic Manoeuvring by Dissociation in Corporate Crisis Communication: The Case of the 2017 United Airlines’ Passenger Dragging-Off Incident. Argumentation 35:2 ► pp. 321 ff.

Ferreira, Maria

2021. Compliance with EU Law and Argumentative Discourse: Representing the EU as a Problem-Solving Multilevel Governance System through Discursive Structures of Argumentation. Argumentation 35:4 ► pp. 645 ff.

Ferreira, Maria

2021. A Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Memory Politics: Spanish Contemporary Memory Politics, Populism Studies, and Argumentative Dialectics. Journal of Nationalism, Memory & Language Politics 15:2 ► pp. 130 ff.

Feteris, Eveline T.

2013. Strategic Maneuvering with the Argumentative Role of Legal Principles in the Case of the “Unworthy Spouse”. In Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives [Law and Philosophy Library, 102], ► pp. 85 ff.

Feteris, Eveline T.

2016. Prototypical Argumentative Patterns in a Legal Context: The Role of Pragmatic Argumentation in the Justification of Judicial Decisions. Argumentation 30:1 ► pp. 61 ff.

Feteris, Eveline T.

2017. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach of Legal Argumentation. In Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 1], ► pp. 201 ff.

Feteris, Eveline T.

2017. Chapter 5. The role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions. In Prototypical Argumentative Patterns [Argumentation in Context, 11], ► pp. 71 ff.

Feteris, Eveline T.

2017. Chapter 4. The role of the judge in legal proceedings. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 59 ff.

Feteris, Eveline T.

2021. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach of Legal Argumentation as Specific Form of Rational Discussion. In Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, ► pp. 1 ff.

Fiammenghi, Carlotta

2023. Argumentative pro-vaccination and anti-vaccination narratives in the MMR vaccine-autism controversy. Communication and Medicine

Figueiras, Rita

2019. Punditry as a reward system: audience construction and the logics of the punditry sphere. Critical Studies in Media Communication 36:2 ► pp. 171 ff.

Galimberti, Carlo, Antonio Bova, Carmen Spanò & Ilaria Vergine

2021. Polydimensional Structure and Psychosocial Functions of the Direct Address in TV Series. Frontiers in Psychology 12

Garssen, Bart

2015. Strategic maneuvering in European Parliamentary Debate. In Argumentation in Political Deliberation [Benjamins Current Topics, 76], ► pp. 33 ff.

Garssen, Bart

2015. Pragma‐dialectics. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ► pp. 1 ff.

Garssen, Bart

2016. Problem-Solving Argumentative Patterns in Plenary Debates of the European Parliament. Argumentation 30:1 ► pp. 25 ff.

Garssen, Bart

2017. Chapter 9. Strategic maneuvering in European Parliamentary debate. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 145 ff.

Gascón, José Ángel

2017. Brothers in Arms: Virtue and Pragma-Dialectics. Argumentation 31:4 ► pp. 705 ff.

Godden, David

2021. The Compliment of Rational Opposition: Disagreement, Adversariality, and Disputation. Topoi 40:5 ► pp. 845 ff.

González González, Manuela, Julder Gómez & Mariantonia Lemos

2019. Theoretical Considerations for the Articulation of Emotion and Argumentation in the Arguer: A Proposal for Emotion Regulation in Deliberation. Argumentation 33:3 ► pp. 349 ff.

Greco, Sara

2017. F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen (eds): Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 31:1 ► pp. 213 ff.

Greco, Sara

2017. Using Argumentative Tools to Understand Inner Dialogue. Argumentation 31:2 ► pp. 331 ff.

Greco, Sara

2018. Frans H. van Eemeren and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans: Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation. Argumentation 32:1 ► pp. 151 ff.

Greco, Sara

2021. Review of Brambilla (2020): The quest for argumentative equivalence. Argumentative patterns in political interpreting contexts. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:3 ► pp. 418 ff.

Greco, Sara, Sara Cigada & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria

2022. The naming of emotions in dispute mediators’ strategic manoeuvring: a case study using a French language corpus. Text & Talk 0:0

Greco, Sara & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria

2021. Mediators’ reframing as a constitutive element of a reconciliatory argumentative style. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 73 ff.

Greco, Sara & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati

2021. Rhetoric. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, ► pp. 1 ff.

Greco, Sara & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati

2021. Rhetorics. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, ► pp. 1 ff.

Greco, Sara & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati

2022. Rhetoric. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, ► pp. 1431 ff.

Greco, Sara & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati

2022. Rhetoric. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, ► pp. 1 ff.

Greco, Sara, Teuta Mehmeti & Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont

2017. Do adult-children dialogical interactions leave space for a full development of argumentation?. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 193 ff.

Greco, Sara, Rebecca Schär, Chiara Pollaroli & Chiara Mercuri

2018. Adding a temporal dimension to the analysis of argumentative discourse:Justified reframingas a means of turning a single-issue discussion into a complex argumentative discussion. Discourse Studies 20:6 ► pp. 726 ff.

Greco Morasso, Sara

2012. Review of van Eemeren (2009): Examining argumentation in context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering. Journal of Argumentation in Context 1:3 ► pp. 379 ff.

Morasso, Sara Greco

2012. Contextual frames and their argumentative implications: A case study in media argumentation. Discourse Studies 14:2 ► pp. 197 ff.

Green, Nancy L.

2017. Roosmaryn Pilgram (2015). A Doctor’s Argument by Authority . Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 271 ff.

Grigorov, Diyan Nikolov & A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans

2019. Hypothetical Questions as Strategic Devices in Negotiation. Negotiation Journal 35:3 ► pp. 363 ff.

Groarke, Leo

2017. Chapter 3. Editorial cartoons and ART. In Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres [Argumentation in Context, 14], ► pp. 82 ff.

Gâţă, Anca

2017. Ahmed Omar (2016). Strategic Maneuvering in Supporting the Feasibility of Political Change. A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis of Egyptian Anti-regime Columns . Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 254 ff.

Gâţă, Anca

2017. Chapter 17. Strategic maneuvering with presentational choices in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 309 ff.

Gâţă, Anca

2017. Strategic maneuvering with presentational choices in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 137 ff.

Gâță, Anca

2021. Characteristics of a detached argumentative style in public policy analysis. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 46 ff.

Haaften, Ton van

2014. Review of Ihnen Jory (2012): Pragmatic argumentation in law-making debates. Instruments for the analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation at the Second Reading of the British Parliament. Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:3 ► pp. 333 ff.

van Haaften, Ton

2017. Chapter 11. Strategic maneuvering with presentational choices in Dutch parliamentary debate. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 177 ff.

Haaften, Ton van & Maarten van Leeuwen

2021. On the relation between argumentative style and linguistic style. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 97 ff.

Hansen, Hans V.

2023. Committing Fallacies and the Appearance Condition. Argumentation 37:2 ► pp. 253 ff.

Hansson, Sten

2018. Defensive semiotic strategies in government: a multimodal study of blame avoidance. Social Semiotics 28:4 ► pp. 472 ff.

Hansson, Sten

2018. Analysing opposition–government blame games: argument models and strategic maneuvering. Critical Discourse Studies 15:3 ► pp. 228 ff.

Hayward, Brent A.

2023. An argumentation analysis of testimony about positive behaviour support and chemical restraint in Australia’s Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities ► pp. 1 ff.

Heiss, Sarah N. & Benjamin R. Bates

2016. When a Spoonful of Fallacies Helps the Sweetener Go Down: The Corn Refiner Association’s Use of Straw-Person Arguments in Health Debates Surrounding High-Fructose Corn Syrup. Health Communication 31:8 ► pp. 1029 ff.

Herman, Thierry & Steve Oswald

2021. Everybody Knows that There Is Something Odd About Ad Populum Arguments. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 305 ff.

Hernández, Alfonso

2021. Journalists’ moves in political press conferences and their implications for accountability. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:3 ► pp. 281 ff.

Hernández, Alfonso

2023. Disentangling Critical Questions from Argument Schemes. Argumentation 37:3 ► pp. 377 ff.

Hernández Rodríguez, Ernesto

2023. Intencionalidad argumentativa suposicional escrita para tratar de explicar un texto literario en bachillerato. Lenguaje 51:2 ► pp. 337 ff.

Hitchcock, David

2017. Postscript. In On Reasoning and Argument [Argumentation Library, 30], ► pp. 335 ff.

Hoppmann, Michael

2017. Competition and conflict between communicative norms. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 220 ff.

Howdle, Giles

2023. Microtargeting, Dogwhistles, and Deliberative Democracy. Topoi 42:2 ► pp. 445 ff.

Huang, Lue & Chuanrui Zhang

2019. Review: Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres. Argumentation 33:3 ► pp. 455 ff.

Iannaccone, Antonio & Francesco Arcidiacono

2017. Argumentation in Dialogue: Final Conclusions. In Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts, ► pp. 201 ff.

Ieţcu-Fairclough, Isabela

2014. Review of Andone (2013): Argumentation in political interviews. Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:3 ► pp. 325 ff.

Ihnen Jory, Constanza

2016. Negotiation and Deliberation: Grasping the Difference. Argumentation 30:2 ► pp. 145 ff.

Ilchenko, Olga & Natalia Kramar

2020. ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES: KEEPING UP WITH THE TIMES. Studia Linguistica :16 ► pp. 40 ff.

Ilie, Cornelia

2017. Chapter 4. Questioning the questionable. In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10], ► pp. 73 ff.

Impedovo, Maria Antonietta, Alice Delserieys-Pedregosa, Corinne Jégou & Konstantinos Ravanis

2017. Shadow Formation at Preschool from a Socio-materiality Perspective. Research in Science Education 47:3 ► pp. 579 ff.

Jackson, Sally

2015. Design Thinking in Argumentation Theory and Practice. Argumentation 29:3 ► pp. 243 ff.

Jackson, Sally

2018. Frans H. van Eemeren and Wu Peng (eds): Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics. Argumentation 32:2 ► pp. 293 ff.

Jacquin, Jérôme

2017. Chapter 9. Embodied argumentation in public debates. In Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres [Argumentation in Context, 14], ► pp. 240 ff.

Jacquin, Jérôme & Marta Zampa

2016. Do we still need an army like in the First World War? An argumentative analysis of a television debate on abolishing compulsory military service in Switzerland. Discourse & Communication 10:5 ► pp. 479 ff.

Jakaza, Ernest

2019. Intersubjective Stance and Argumentation in Zimbabwean Parliamentary Discourse. In Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 97 ff.

Jakaza, Ernest

2023. (Re)thinking and (Re)theorising ‘Multi’ and Its Futures in Academic Discourse Studies. In Multidisciplinary Knowledge Production and Research Methods in Sub-Saharan Africa, ► pp. 91 ff.

Jakaza, Ernest & Marianna Visser

2016. ‘Subjectivity’ in newspaper reports on ‘controversial’ and ‘emotional’ debates: An appraisal and controversy analysis. Language Matters 47:1 ► pp. 3 ff.

Jakaza, Ernest & Marianna W. Visser

2016. Argumentation and Appraisal in Divergent Zimbabwean Parliamentary Debates. In Political Discourse in Emergent, Fragile, and Failed Democracies [Advances in Electronic Government, Digital Divide, and Regional Development, ], ► pp. 126 ff.

Jansen, Henrike

2017. Chapter 12. The space for strategic manoeuvring in adjudicating a freedom of speech case in the Netherlands. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 193 ff.

Jansen, Henrike

2017. The space for strategic manoeuvring in adjudicating a freedom of speech case in the Netherlands. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 105 ff.

Jansen, Henrike

2017. “You Think That Says a Lot, but Really it Says Nothing”: An Argumentative and Linguistic Account of an Idiomatic Expression Functioning as a Presentational Device. Argumentation 31:4 ► pp. 615 ff.

Jansen, Henrike

2020. “The people want it”. Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:3 ► pp. 342 ff.

Jansen, Henrike & Francisca Snoeck Henkemans

2021. Strategic Manoeuvring with the Expression “Not for Nothing”. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 285 ff.

Jansen, Henrike & Francisca Snoeck Henkemans

2020. Argumentative Use and Strategic Function of the Expression ‘Not for Nothing’. Argumentation 34:2 ► pp. 143 ff.

Jansen, Henrike & Maarten van Leeuwen

2021. The presentational dimension of Geert Wilders’s populist argumentative style. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 121 ff.

Johnson, Ralph H. & Christopher W. Tindale

2013. Introduction. Philosophy & Rhetoric 46:4 ► pp. 379 ff.

Juthe, André

2019. Reconstructing Complex Pro/Con Argumentation. Argumentation 33:3 ► pp. 413 ff.

Karnieli-Miller, Orit & Galit Neufeld-Kroszynski

2018. The potential of argumentation theory in enhancing patient-centered care in breaking bad news encounters. Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:2 ► pp. 120 ff.

Kharmandar, Mohammad Ali

2016. Argumentation-based literary translation quality assessment. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:2 ► pp. 139 ff.

Kienpointner, Manfred

2001. Figures of Speech. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.

Kienpointner, Manfred

2005. Rhetoric. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.

Kienpointner, Manfred

2012. When Figurative Analogies Fail: Fallacious Uses of Arguments from Analogy. In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 22], ► pp. 111 ff.

Kienpointner, Manfred

2017. Chapter 5. Reason and passion in political rhetoric. In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10], ► pp. 99 ff.

Kienpointner, Manfred

2019. Kati Hannken-Illjes: Argumentation. Einführung in die Theorie und Analyse der Argumentation. Narr/Francke/Attempto: Tübingen, 2018, 193 pp. Argumentation 33:1 ► pp. 147 ff.

Kienpointner, Manfred

2021. The pen is mightier than the sword. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9:2 ► pp. 215 ff.

Kienpointner, Manfred

2021. Review of van Eemeren (2018): Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:2 ► pp. 262 ff.

Kienpointner, Manfred

2022. Viva la libertà! . Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:1 ► pp. 110 ff.

Kienpointner, Manfred

2022. Rhetoric. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 1159 ff.

Kienpointner, Manfred

2023. Introduction. Discourse Studies 25:4 ► pp. 465 ff.

Kienpointner, Manfred

2023. Review of van Eemeren, Garssen, Greco, van Haaften, Labrie, Leal & Wu (2022): Argumentative Style. Journal of Argumentation in Context 12:2 ► pp. 243 ff.

Kjeldsen, Jens E.

2015. The Study of Visual and Multimodal Argumentation. Argumentation 29:2 ► pp. 115 ff.

Kloosterhuis, Harm

2013. The Logic of Indirect Insulting in Legal Discussions: A Speech Act Perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal

Kloosterhuis, Harm

2013. The Rule of Law and the Ideal of a Critical Discussion. In Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives [Law and Philosophy Library, 102], ► pp. 71 ff.

Kloosterhuis, Harm

2014. Institutional Constraints of Topical Strategic Maneuvering in Legal Argumentation: The Case of Insultingg. SSRN Electronic Journal

Kloosterhuis, Harm

2015. Institutional Constraints of Topical Strategic Maneuvering in Legal Argumentation. The Case of ‘Insulting’. In Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation [Law and Philosophy Library, 112], ► pp. 67 ff.

Krabbe, Erik C. W. & Jan Albert van Laar

2011. The Ways of Criticism. Argumentation 25:2 ► pp. 199 ff.

Kwon, Winston, Ian Clarke & Ruth Wodak

2014. Micro‐Level Discursive Strategies for Constructing Shared Views around Strategic Issues in Team Meetings. Journal of Management Studies 51:2 ► pp. 265 ff.

Labrie, Nanon

2012. Strategic Maneuvering in Treatment Decision-Making Discussions: Two Cases in Point. Argumentation 26:2 ► pp. 171 ff.

Labrie, Nanon

2019. “Doctor, I disagree”. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:3 ► pp. 336 ff.

Labrie, Nanon & Peter J. Schulz

2014. Does Argumentation Matter? A Systematic Literature Review on the Role of Argumentation in Doctor–Patient Communication. Health Communication 29:10 ► pp. 996 ff.

Lauwers, Jeroen, Tom Deneire & David Eelbode

2015. The question of literary quality. Scientific Study of Literature 5:1 ► pp. 3 ff.

Lavalette, Kiki Y. Renardel de, Corina Andone & Gerard J. Steen

2019. Figurative analogies and how they are resisted in British Public Bill Committee debates. Metaphor and the Social World 9:1 ► pp. 107 ff.

Lawrence, John, Jacky Visser, Chris Reed, Randy Allen Harris & Chrysanne Di Marco

2017. Harnessing rhetorical figures for argument mining. Argument & Computation 8:3 ► pp. 289 ff.

Leal, Fernando

2016. Review of: Frans H. van Eemeren (2015): Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics, Cham (CH), Springer (= Argumentation Library, 27), 880 pp.. Argumentation 30:4 ► pp. 527 ff.

Leal, Fernando

2019. On philosophical argumentation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:2 ► pp. 173 ff.

Leal, Fernando

2019. Chapter 16. On philosophical argumentation. In Argumentation in Actual Practice [Argumentation in Context, 17], ► pp. 299 ff.

Leal, Fernando

2020. Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild: A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 34:3 ► pp. 389 ff.

Leal, Fernando

2020. On the Importance of Questioning Within the Ideal Model of Critical Discussion. Argumentation 34:4 ► pp. 405 ff.

Leal, Fernando

2022. Is Natural Selection in Trouble? When Emotions Run High in a Philosophical Debate. Argumentation 36:4 ► pp. 541 ff.

Leal, Fernando & Hubert Marraud

2022. Final Cross-Examination. In How Philosophers Argue [Argumentation Library, 41], ► pp. 437 ff.

Leal, Fernando & Hubert Marraud

2022. Argumentation Theories. In How Philosophers Argue [Argumentation Library, 41], ► pp. 21 ff.

Leal, Fernando & Hubert Marraud

2022. Intertwined Structures. In How Philosophers Argue [Argumentation Library, 41], ► pp. 347 ff.

Lecompte-Van Poucke, Margo

2021. The value of a pragma-functional approach to intercultural conflict discourses. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 3:1 ► pp. 130 ff.

Lewiński, Marcin

2010. Collective Argumentative Criticism in Informal Online Discussion Forums. Argumentation and Advocacy 47:2 ► pp. 86 ff.

Lewiński, Marcin

2011. Towards a Critique-Friendly Approach to the Straw Man Fallacy Evaluation. Argumentation 25:4 ► pp. 469 ff.

Lewiński, Marcin

2015. Debating multiple positions in multi-party online deliberation. In Argumentation in Political Deliberation [Benjamins Current Topics, 76], ► pp. 151 ff.

Lewiński, Marcin

2016. Shale gas debate in Europe: Pro-and-con dialectics and argumentative polylogues. Discourse & Communication 10:6 ► pp. 553 ff.

Lewiński, Marcin & Mark Aakhus

2014. Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry. Argumentation 28:2 ► pp. 161 ff.

Lewiński, Marcin, Mark Aakhus & Karen Tracy

2023. Argumentation in Complex Communication: Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue Cambridge University Press, 263 pp. Argumentation 37:3 ► pp. 493 ff.

Lind, Judith

2019. The rights of intended children: The best interests of the child argument in assisted reproduction policy. Childhood 26:3 ► pp. 352 ff.

Linqiong, Yan

2017. Chapter 16. A pragma-dialectical approach to governmental crisis communication. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 281 ff.

Linqiong, Yan

2017. A pragma-dialectical approach to governmental crisis communication. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:3 ► pp. 315 ff.

Livnat, Zohar

2016. Review of Popa (2016): Thought Experiments in Academic Communication. A Pragma-Dialectical Method for Reconstructing the Argumentative Use of Imaginary Scenarios in Academic Disputes. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:3 ► pp. 348 ff.

Lukianova, Ekaterina & Timothy Steffensmeier

2020. “Well, in the case of my mom…”. Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:3 ► pp. 315 ff.

López, Federico E.

2020. Argument Evaluation in Philosophy: Fallacies as Strategic Maneuvering. In From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild [Argumentation Library, 35], ► pp. 63 ff.

Macagno, Fabrizio

2013. Strategies of Character Attack. Argumentation 27:4 ► pp. 369 ff.

Macagno, Fabrizio

2014. Manipulating Emotions: Value-Based Reasoning and Emotive Language. Argumentation and Advocacy 51:2 ► pp. 103 ff.

Macagno, Fabrizio & Sarah Bigi

2020. Analyzing dialogue moves in chronic care communication. Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:2 ► pp. 167 ff.

Macagno, Fabrizio & Rosalice Botelho Wakim Souza Pinto

2021. Reconstructing Multimodal Arguments in Advertisements: Combining Pragmatics and Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 35:1 ► pp. 141 ff.

Macagno, Fabrizio & Douglas Walton

2017. Evaluating Relevance and Commitments in Rhetorical Straw Man. In Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 14], ► pp. 143 ff.

Marraud, Hubert

2018. Arguments from Ostension. Argumentation 32:3 ► pp. 309 ff.

Martins, Marina & Fabrizio Macagno

2022. An analytical instrument for coding and assessing argumentative dialogues in science teaching contexts. Science Education 106:3 ► pp. 573 ff.

Mazzi, Davide

2014. “Our reading would lead to…”. Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:2 ► pp. 103 ff.

Mazzi, Davide

2022. The Irish Public Discourse on Covid-19 at the Intersection of Legislation, Fake News and Judicial Argumentation. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 35:3 ► pp. 1233 ff.

Mercier, Hugo

2012. Looking for Arguments. Argumentation 26:3 ► pp. 305 ff.

Mercuri, Chiara

2023. Characterization Frames Constructing Endoxa in Activists’ Discourse About the Public Controversy Surrounding Fashion Sustainability. Topoi 42:2 ► pp. 635 ff.

Migdalek, Maia Julieta, Celia Renata Rosemberg & Cristian Santibáñez Yáñez

2015. La Génesis de la Argumentación. Un Estudio con Niños de 3 a 5 Años en Distintos Contextos de Juego. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura 19:3

Miserez-Caperos, Céline

2019. Francesco Arcidiacono & Antonio Bova (2017). Interpersonal argumentation in educational and professional contexts . Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:3 ► pp. 392 ff.

Mohammed, Dima

2016. Goals in Argumentation: A Proposal for the Analysis and Evaluation of Public Political Arguments. Argumentation 30:3 ► pp. 221 ff.

Mohammed, Dima

2018. Exercising Accountability in European Parliamentary Debates on Statements: An Argumentative Perspective. In Argumentation and Language — Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations [Argumentation Library, 32], ► pp. 243 ff.

Mohammed, Dima

2019. Standing Standpoints and Argumentative Associates: What is at Stake in a Public Political Argument?. Argumentation 33:3 ► pp. 307 ff.

Msagalla, Brighton & Marianna Visser

2021. Agenda-setting through topic shift in Tanzanian parliamentary debate: The derailment of strategic manoeuvring. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 39:4 ► pp. 327 ff.

Musi, Elena & Mark Aakhus

2018. Discovering Argumentative Patterns in Energy Polylogues: A Macroscope for Argument Mining. Argumentation 32:3 ► pp. 397 ff.

Mădroane, Irina Diana

2019. Chapter 3. Television dispositives and the enactment of advocacy arguments. In Argumentation in Actual Practice [Argumentation in Context, 17], ► pp. 33 ff.

Na, Yang

2017. Strategic maneuvering by persuasive definition in corporate crisis communication. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:3 ► pp. 344 ff.

Nadeem, Nahla

2023. Exploring TED Speakers’ Narrative Positioning from a Strategic Maneuvering Perspective: A Single Case Study from Winch’s (2014) TED Talk. Argumentation 37:3 ► pp. 437 ff.

Navarro, María G.

2020. Emergencia del institucionalismo en la teoría argumental. Azafea: Revista de Filosofía 22:1 ► pp. 167 ff.

Nettel, Ana Laura & Georges Roque

2012. Introduction. Argumentation 26:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Niño, Douglas & Danny Marrero

2015. The Agentive Approach to Argumentation: A Proposal. In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 28], ► pp. 53 ff.

Novak, Marko

2020. Multi-modal argumentation and rhetoric in judicial proceedings. Argumentation and Advocacy 56:1 ► pp. 41 ff.

Okuda, Hiroko & Takeshi Suzuki

2018. Prime Minister Abe’s challenge to the Japanese Postwar Constitution. Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:1 ► pp. 18 ff.

Olayinka Unuabonah, Foluke

2020. Argumentation in Nigerian investigative public hearings. Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:2 ► pp. 199 ff.

Omar, Ahmed Abdulhameed

2019. The strategic use of argumentation from example in re-evaluating a people. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:2 ► pp. 214 ff.

Oswald, Steve, Sara Greco, Johanna Miecznikowski, Chiara Pollaroli & Andrea Rocci

2020. Argumentation and meaning. Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Oswald, Steve & Thierry Herman

2020. Give the Standard Treatment of Fallacies a Chance! Cognitive and Rhetorical Insights into Fallacy Processing. In From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild [Argumentation Library, 35], ► pp. 41 ff.

Oswald, Steve, Thierry Herman & Jérôme Jacquin

2018. Introduction. In Argumentation and Language — Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations [Argumentation Library, 32], ► pp. 1 ff.

Paglieri, Fabio & Cristiano Castelfranchi

2014. Trust, relevance, and arguments. Argument & Computation 5:2-3 ► pp. 216 ff.

Paglieri, Fabio & Chris Reed

2017. Introduction: Theoretical and Technological Perspectives on Online Arguments. Philosophy & Technology 30:2 ► pp. 131 ff.

Paliewicz, Nicholas S. & George F. (Guy) McHendry

2017. When good arguments do not work: post-dialectics, argument assemblages, and the networks of climate skepticism. Argumentation and Advocacy 53:4 ► pp. 287 ff.

Palmieri, Rudi

2017. The Role of Argumentation in Financial Communication and Investor Relations. In The Handbook of Financial Communication and Investor Relations, ► pp. 45 ff.

Palmieri, Rudi & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati

2016. Multiple Audiences as Text Stakeholders: A Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Complex Rhetorical Situations. Argumentation 30:4 ► pp. 467 ff.

Palmieri, Rudi & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati

2017. Practical reasoning in corporate communication with multiple audiences. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 167 ff.

Palmieri, Rudi & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati

2021. Strategic Communication with Multiple Audiences: Polyphony, Text Stakeholders, and Argumentation. International Journal of Strategic Communication 15:3 ► pp. 159 ff.

Palmieri, Rudi, Chiara Mercuri & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati

2022. Persuasive Reasons in Crowdfunding Campaigns: Comparing Argumentative Strategies in Successful and Unsuccessful Projects on Kickstarter. International Journal of Strategic Communication 16:2 ► pp. 332 ff.

Palmieri, Rudi & Johanna Miecznikowski

2016. Predictions in economic-financial news. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:1 ► pp. 48 ff.

Palmieri, Rudi & Eddo Rigotti

2014. Suspicion as an argumentative move. Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:3 ► pp. 287 ff.

Pan, Dawei

2018. “Doctors Killed My Baby”: Argumentative Patterns in Medical Disputes in China. Health Communication 33:10 ► pp. 1267 ff.

Pan, Dawei, Yanjin Chen & Shier Ju

2018. Argumentative Patterns in Chinese Medical Consultations. Argumentation 32:1 ► pp. 37 ff.

Peng, Wu

2017. Chapter 13. Strategic maneuvering by personal attacks at press conferences of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],

Peng, Wu

2017. Chapter 13. Strategic maneuvering by personal attacks at press conferences of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 225 ff.

Peng, Wu

2017. Strategic maneuvering by personal attacks in spokespersons’ argumentative replies at diplomatic press conferences. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:3 ► pp. 285 ff.

Peng, Wu & Xu Cihua

2017. Argumentative discourse in contemporary China. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:3 ► pp. 277 ff.

Pietrucci, Pamela

2023. Neofascist “Thugs,” Pandemic Protests, Populisms: Giorgia Meloni’s Cerchiobottismo and the Rise of Fratelli D’Italia During the Pandemic. Javnost - The Public 30:1 ► pp. 51 ff.

Pilgram, Roosmaryn

2017. Chapter 7. Argumentation in doctor-patient interaction. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 109 ff.

Pilgram, Roosmaryn & Lotte van Poppel

2021. The Strategic Use of Metaphor in Argumentation. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 191 ff.

Pinchao, Lu

2017. Wu Peng. (2017). Discourse and trade dispute: A discourse-analytic research on Sino-US trade disputes over tire imports . Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:3 ► pp. 381 ff.

Plug, H José

2010. Institutional Boundaries on the Evaluation of Argumentation in Legislative Discussions. Legisprudence 4:1 ► pp. 53 ff.

Plug, H. José

2017. Chapter 13. Attacks on the cartoonist’s strategic manoeuvring. In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10], ► pp. 217 ff.

Plug, H. José

2019. Challenging judicial impartiality. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:2 ► pp. 245 ff.

Poggi, Isabella, Francesca D’Errico, Laura Vincze & Alessandro Vinciarelli

2013. Introduction. In Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social Action [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7688], ► pp. 1 ff.

Pollaroli, Chiara & Andrea Rocci

2015. The argumentative relevance of pictorial and multimodal metaphor in advertising. Journal of Argumentation in Context 4:2 ► pp. 158 ff.

Polyzou, Alexandra

2015. PRESUPPOSITION IN DISCOURSE. Critical Discourse Studies 12:2 ► pp. 123 ff.

Popa, Eugen

2013. Review of Suzuki, Kato, Kubota & Murai (2012): Proceedings of the 4th Tokyo Conference on Argumentation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 2:3 ► pp. 346 ff.

Popa, Eugen Octav, Vincent Blok & Renate Wesselink

2021. An Agonistic Approach to Technological Conflict. Philosophy & Technology 34:4 ► pp. 717 ff.

Prata, Maria José, Bruno de Sousa, Isabel Festas & Albertina L. Oliveira

2019. Cooperative methods and self-regulated strategies development for argumentative writing. The Journal of Educational Research 112:1 ► pp. 12 ff.

Pruś, Jakub

2021. How Can Modifications of Meaning Influence Argumentation? The Concept and Typology of Semantic Arguments. Argumentation 35:3 ► pp. 483 ff.

Raccah, Pierre-Yves

2015. Linguistic Argumentation as a Shortcut for the Empirical Study of Argumentative Strategies. In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 28], ► pp. 279 ff.

Reijven, Menno H.

2021. The co-construction of campaign argumentation on U.S.A. late-night talk shows. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:3 ► pp. 397 ff.

Renardel de Lavalette, Kiki Yvonne, Corina Andone & Gerard J. Steen

2019. I did not say that the government should be plundering anybody’s savings. Journal of Language and Politics 18:5 ► pp. 718 ff.

Ribeiro, Henrique Jales

2014. The Role of Analogy in Philosophical Discourse. In Systematic Approaches to Argument by Analogy [Argumentation Library, 25], ► pp. 275 ff.

Rigotti, Eddo

2014. The Nature and Functions of Loci in Agricola’s De Inuentione Dialectica. Argumentation 28:1 ► pp. 19 ff.

Rigotti, Eddo

2014. Review of van Eemeren & Garssen (2012): Exploring Argumentative Contexts. Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:2 ► pp. 199 ff.

Rigotti, Eddo & Sara Greco

2019. Modern and Contemporary Approaches. In Inference in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 34], ► pp. 169 ff.

Rigotti, Eddo & Sara Greco

2019. Advanced Theoretical Perspectives and Open Questions. In Inference in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 34], ► pp. 247 ff.

Rigotti, Eddo & Sara Greco

2019. Cicero’s Topica and the Establishment of the Topical Tradition by Boethius. In Inference in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 34], ► pp. 59 ff.

Rocci, Andrea

2017. Meaning and Argumentation. In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29], ► pp. 33 ff.

Rocci, Andrea

2017. Case Studies of Italian Modal Constructions in Context. In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29], ► pp. 371 ff.

Rocci, Andrea

2017. Introduction. In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29], ► pp. 1 ff.

Rocci, Andrea

2017. Types of Conversational Backgrounds and Arguments. In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29], ► pp. 275 ff.

Rocci, Andrea

2017. Three Views of Modality in Toulmin. In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29], ► pp. 105 ff.

Rocci, Andrea

2017. Relative Modality and Argumentation. In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29], ► pp. 197 ff.

Rocci, Andrea & Margherita Luciani

2016. Economic-financial journalists as argumentative intermediaries. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:1 ► pp. 88 ff.

Rocci, Andrea, Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati & Chiara Pollaroli

2018. The argumentative and rhetorical function of multimodal metonymy. Semiotica 2018:220 ► pp. 123 ff.

Rocci, Andrea & Marta Zampa

2013. Peter A. Cramer: Controversy as News Discourse. Argumentation 27:3 ► pp. 327 ff.

Rodgers, Elena

2016. A Rhetorical Analysis of Folk Linguistic Discourse: The Case of Twang. American Speech 91:4 ► pp. 393 ff.

Rodrigues, Soledade, Marcin Lewiński & Mehmet Ali Üzelgün

2019. Environmental manifestoes. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:1 ► pp. 12 ff.

Roque, Georges

2012. Visual Argumentation: A Further Reappraisal. In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 22], ► pp. 273 ff.

Roque, Georges

2017. Chapter 1. Rhetoric, argumentation, and persuasion in a multimodal perspective. In Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres [Argumentation in Context, 14], ► pp. 26 ff.

Rossini, Antonio

2020. An Early Renaissance Altarpiece by Domenico Veneziano: A Case of Visual Argumentation?. Argumentation 34:1 ► pp. 39 ff.

Rubinelli, Sara

2013. Argumentation as Rational Persuasion in Doctor-Patient Communication. Philosophy & Rhetoric 46:4 ► pp. 550 ff.

Rubinelli, Sara, Peter J. Schulz & Uwe Hartung

2010. “Your risk is low, because …”: argument-driven online genetic counselling. Argument & Computation 1:3 ► pp. 199 ff.

Santulli, Francesca

2023. Genre as a Context for Persuasion: The Construction of Identities in Different Forms of Institutionalised Discourse. A Case Study. In Exploring Contextualism and Performativity [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 30], ► pp. 57 ff.

Santulli, Francesca & Chiara Degano

2022. Agreement: An Argumentation Perspective. In Agreement in Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 31], ► pp. 27 ff.

Santulli, Francesca & Chiara Degano

2022. Agreement and Persuasion. In Agreement in Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 31], ► pp. 1 ff.

Santulli, Francesca & Chiara Degano

2022. A Presidential Debate: Exploiting Agreement in an Adversarial Context. In Agreement in Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 31], ► pp. 145 ff.

Seppanen, Marita

2023. The quality of argumentation and metacognitive reflection in engineering co-Design. European Journal of Engineering Education 48:1 ► pp. 75 ff.

Serafis, Dimitris & Assimakis Tseronis

2023. The front page as a canvas for multimodal argumentation: Brexit in the Greek press. Frontiers in Communication 8

Serakioti, Dimitra & Petros Stefaneas

2022. Ambiguity in Argumentation: The Impact of Contextual Factors on Semantic Interpretation. Studia Humana 11:3-4 ► pp. 18 ff.

Siegel, Harvey

2015. Argumentative Norms: How Contextual Can They Be? A Cautionary Tale. In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 28], ► pp. 205 ff.

Sijadu, Zameka Paula

2020. Metaphors as strategic manoeuvring in isiXhosa traditional argumentative political discourse. South African Journal of African Languages 40:2 ► pp. 198 ff.

Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. & J. H. M. Wagemans

2015. Reasonableness in Context: Taking into Account Institutional Conventions in the Pragma-Dialectical Evaluation of Argumentative Discourse. In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 28], ► pp. 217 ff.

Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca

2017. Chapter 15. Strategic manoeuvring with hyperbole in political debate. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 269 ff.

Sorlin, Sandrine

2016. Manipulative Moves: Between Persuasion and Coercion. In Language and Manipulation in House of Cards, ► pp. 107 ff.

Sorlin, Sandrine

2016. Power & (Fictional) Politics. In Language and Manipulation in House of Cards, ► pp. 1 ff.

Spranzi, Marta

2012. The Nature and Purpose of Aristotelian Dialectic Revisited: Argumentation Theory, Scientific Controversies and Epistemology. In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 22], ► pp. 163 ff.

Stevens, Katharina

2019. The Roles We Make Others Take: Thoughts on the Ethics of Arguing. Topoi 38:4 ► pp. 693 ff.

Stevens, Katharina & Daniel H. Cohen

2021. Angelic Devil’s Advocates and the Forms of Adversariality. Topoi 40:5 ► pp. 899 ff.

Svačinová, Iva

2021. Demosthenes’ strategic maneuvering in the First Olynthiac . Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:3 ► pp. 315 ff.

Svačinová, Iva

2021. Pragma-Dialectical Reconstruction of Crisis Diary-Writing as a Communicative Activity Type. Argumentation 35:2 ► pp. 237 ff.

Svačinová, Iva

2022. Three forms of internal negotiation through the activity of private diary-writing. Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:2 ► pp. 243 ff.

Tribastone, Miriam & Sara Greco

2018. Framing in News Discourse. In Empirical Research on Semiotics and Visual Rhetoric [Advances in Multimedia and Interactive Technologies, ], ► pp. 71 ff.

Tseronis, Assimakis

2013. Review of Fairclough & Fairclough (2012): Political discourse analysis. A method for advanced students. Journal of Argumentation in Context 2:2 ► pp. 269 ff.

Tseronis, Assimakis

2017. Chapter 18. Analysing multimodal argumentation within the pragma-dialectical framework. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 335 ff.

Tseronis, Assimakis

2018. Multimodal argumentation: Beyond the verbal/visual divide. Semiotica 2018:220 ► pp. 41 ff.

Tseronis, Assimakis

2021. How Face Threatening Are Disagreement Moves? A Proposal for an Integration of Insights from Politeness Theory into Argumentation Theory. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 167 ff.

Tseronis, Assimakis

2022. Use and abuse of the strategic function of in fact and frankly when qualifying a standpoint. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 473 ff.

Tuzet, Giovanni

2015. On the Absence of Evidence. In Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation [Law and Philosophy Library, 112], ► pp. 37 ff.

Uzelgun, Mehmet Ali, Dima Mohammed, Marcin Lewiński & Paula Castro

2015. Managing disagreement throughyes, but… constructions: An argumentative analysis. Discourse Studies 17:4 ► pp. 467 ff.

van Bijnen, Emma & Sara Greco

2018. Divide to unite. Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:3 ► pp. 285 ff.

van den Hoven, Paul

2012. The Narrator and the Interpreter in Visual and Verbal Argumentation. In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 22], ► pp. 257 ff.

van den Hoven, Paul

2012. E. Feteris, B. Garssen and F. Snoeck Henkemans (eds): Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics. In Honor of Frans H. van Eemeren. Argumentation 26:3 ► pp. 409 ff.

van den Hoven, Paul

2017. Narratives and Pragmatic Arguments: Ivens’ The 400 Million. In Narration as Argument [Argumentation Library, 31], ► pp. 103 ff.

van den Hoven, Paul

2018. Discussing discourse modalities in argument theory: Reconsidering a paradigm . Semiotica 2018:220 ► pp. 19 ff.

van den Hoven, Paul & Ying Yang

2013. The Argumentative Reconstruction of Multimodal Discourse, Taking the ABC Coverage of President Hu Jintao’s Visit to the USA as an Example. Argumentation 27:4 ► pp. 403 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans & Bart Garssen

2023. A functional diversity of argumentative styles. Discourse Studies 25:4 ► pp. 510 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels

2015. The Extended Pragma-Dialectical Argumentation Theory Empirically Interpreted. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 759 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen

2013. Viewing the Study of Argumentation as Normative Pragmatics. In Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 1], ► pp. 515 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen

2014. Argumentation by Analogy in Stereotypical Argumentative Patterns. In Systematic Approaches to Argument by Analogy [Argumentation Library, 25], ► pp. 41 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen

2015. Exploiting the Room for Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse Dealing with Audience Demand in the European Parliament. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 861 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen

2015. Viewing the Study of Argumentation as Normative Pragmatics. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 275 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen

2015. Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse with the Help of Speech Act Conditions. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 469 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen

2016. Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse with the Help of Speech Act Conditions. In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 4], ► pp. 447 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen

2019. Chapter 17. And then you are left holding the baby!. In Argumentation in Actual Practice [Argumentation in Context, 17], ► pp. 321 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen

2020. A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory. In From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild [Argumentation Library, 35], ► pp. 1 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen

2023. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach to the Fallacies Revisited. Argumentation 37:2 ► pp. 167 ff.