Chapter published in:
A History of Modern Translation Knowledge: Sources, concepts, effects
Edited by Lieven D’hulst and Yves Gambier
[Benjamins Translation Library 142] 2018
► pp. 19–38

Concepts of translation

| University of Turku, Finland | Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russia
Keywords: conceptualisation, difference, Eurocentrism, internationalisation, mediation, Sanskrit, similarity
Published online: 28 June 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.142.02gam
References

References

Akbatur, Arzu
2015 “Exploring tercüman as a Culture-Bound Concept in Islamic Mysticism.” In S. Tahir Gürçağlar, et al. (eds), Tradition, Tension and Translation in Turkey, 53–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Azadibougar, Omid, and Esmaeil Haddadian-Moghaddam
Forthcoming. “The Persian Tradition.” In Y. Gambier and U. Stecconi (eds)
Baccouche, Taïb
2000 “La traduction dans le monde arabe.” Meta 45 (3): 395–399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mona, and Gabriela Saldanha
(eds) 1998/2009 Encyclopedia of Translation Studies. London/New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bastin, Georges, and Paul Bandia
(eds) 2006 Charting the Future of Translation History. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bastin, Georges, and Alvaro Echeverri
2004 “Traduction et révolution à l’époque de l’indépendance hispano-américaine.” Meta 49 (3): 562–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Antoine
2013 Jacques Amyot, traducteur français. Essai sur les origines de la traduction en France. Paris: Editions Belin.Google Scholar
Berk Albachten, Özlem
2013 “Intralingual Translation as “Modernization” of the Language. The Turkish Case.” Perspectives 21 (2): 257–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh
2000/2007 Provincializing Europe. Postcolonial thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chan, Leo Tak-hung
2004 Twentieth-century Chinese Translation Theory: Modes, Issues and Debates. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Nam Fung
2015 “Does ‘Translation’ Reflect a Narrower Concept than fanyi? On the Impact of Western Theories on China and the Concern about Eurocentrism.” Translation and Interpreting Studies 10 (2): 223–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew
2004a “Beyond the Particular.” In Translation Universals: Do they Exist?, ed. by Anna Mauranen and Pekka Kujamäki, 33–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004b “Where is Similarity?” In Similarity and Difference in Translation, ed. by Stefano Arduiti and Robert Hodgson, 63–75. Rimini: Guaraldi.Google Scholar
2006 “Interpreting the Meaning of Translation.” In A man of measure: Festschrift in honour of Fred Karlsson on his 60th birthday, SKY Journal of Linguistics 19, ed. by M. Suominen, et al., 3–11. http://​www​-helsinki​.fi​/~chesterm​/2006a​.meaning​.htmlGoogle Scholar
2014 “Universalism in Translation Studies.” Translation Studies 7 (1): 82–90 (and Responses pp. 92–107 by R. Ricci, R. Kothari, J. Wakabayashi, and M. Tymoczko) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Martha
2005 “To Translate ‘Means’ to Exchange. A New Interpretation of the Earliest Chinese Attempts to Define Translation (fanyi).” Target 17 (1): 27–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 An Anthology of Chinese Discourse on Translation. vol. 1: From Earliest Times to the Buddhist project. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
2011 “Reconceptualisation Translation: Some Chinese Endeavours.” Meta 56 (1): 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chittiphalangri, Phrae
2014 “The Emerging Literariness: Translation, Dynamic Canonicity and the Problematic Verisimilitude in Early Thai Prose Fictions.” In Translation and Global Asia: Relocating Cultural Production Network, ed. by Uganda Sze-Pui Kwan and Lawrence Wang-chi Wong, 207–242. Hong-Kong: The Chinese University of Hong-Kong Press.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. “From Plagiarism to Incense Sticks: The Making of Self and the Other in Translation History.” In Yves Gambier and Ubaldo Stecconi (eds)
Delabastita, Dirk
2008 “Status, Origin, Features: Translation and Beyond.” In Beyond Descriptive Translation Studies, ed. By Anthony Pym, Miriam Shlesinger, and Daniel Simeoni, 233–246. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Demircioğlu, Cemel
Forthcoming. “Altaic Tradition: Turkey.” In Yves Gambier and Ubaldo Stecconi (eds)
D’hulst, Lieven
2013 “Assumed Translation.” In Yves Gambier and L. van Doorslaer (eds), vol. 4, 7–11.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. “Latin/Romance Tradition.” In Yves Gambier and Ubaldo Stecconi (eds)
Diriker, Ebru
2015 “On the Evolution of the Interpreting Profession in Turkey. From the Dragomans to the 21st Century.” In Tahir Gürçağlar, et al. (eds), Tradition, Tension and Translation in Turkey, 89–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Doorslaer, Luc
2012 “Eurocentrism.” In Yves Gambier and L. van Doorslaer (eds), vol. 3, 47–51.Google Scholar
Evans, Ruth
2006 “Vulgar Eloquence? Cultural Models and Practices of Translation in late Medieval Europe.” In T. Hermans (ed.), vol. 2, Translating Others, 296–313.Google Scholar
Farahzad, Farzaneh
2009 “(Mis)representation of Sufism through Translation.” In J. Wakabayashi and R. Kothari (eds), Decentring Translation Studies. India and Beyond, 133–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gambier, Yves, and Luc van Doorslaer
(eds) 2010–2013 Handbook of Translation Studies, 4 vols (1: 2010, 2: 2011, 3: 2012, 4: 2013). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Also available online: https://​benjamins​.com​/online​/hts doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gambier, Yves, and Ubaldo Stecconi
(eds) Forthcoming A World Atlas of Translation Amsterdam John Benjamins
Gentzler, Edwin
2008 Translation and Identity in the Americas. New Directions in Translation Theory. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gopinathan, G.
2000 “Ancient Indian Theories of Translation. A Reconstruction.” In Beyond the Western Tradition, ed. by Marylin Gaddis Rose, 165–173. Binghamton: State University of New York.Google Scholar
2006 “Translation, Transcreation and Culture.” In T. Hermans (ed.), Translating Others, 236–246.Google Scholar
Grammenidis, Simos, and Georgios Floros
Forthcoming. “The Greek-speaking Tradition.” In Yves Gambier and Ubaldo Stecconi (eds)
Hanna, Sameh, Hanem El-Farahaty, and Abdel Wahab Khalifa
Forthcoming. The Routledge Handbook of Arabic Translation. London/New York: Routledge.
Hagen, Gottfried
2003 “Translations and Translators in a Multilingual Society. A Case Study of Persian-Ottoman Translations, Late Fifteenth Century to Early Seventeenth Century.” Eurasian Studies 2 (1): 95–134.Google Scholar
Halverson, Sandra
1999 “Conceptual Work and the ‘Translation’ Concept.” Target 11 (1): 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Translation.” In Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer (eds), vol. 1, 378–384.Google Scholar
Hermans, Theo
(ed.) 2006 Translating Others, 2 vols. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
① ② ③ ④
2013 “What is (not) Translation?” In The Routledge Handbook of Translation Studies, ed. by Carmen Millán and Francesca Bartrina, 75–88. London /New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hung, Eva
(ed.) 2005 Translation and Cultural Change. Studies in History, Norms and Image-projection. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
① ②
2005 “Cultural Borderlines in China’s Translation History.” In Eva Hung (ed.), Translation and Cultural Change. Studies in History, Norms and Image-projection, 43–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “And the Translator is – Translators in China History.” In T. Hermans (ed.), Translating Others, 145–160.Google Scholar
Jedamski, Doris
2005 “Translation in the Malay World. Different Communities, Different Agendas.” In Asian Translation Traditions, ed. by Eva Hung and Judy Wakabayashi, 211–245. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Kothari, Rita, and Shah Krupa
Forthcoming. “More or Less ‘Translation’: Landscapes of Language and Communication in India.” In Y. Gambier and U. Stecconi (eds)
Lung, Rachel
2011 Interpreters in Early Imperial China. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McElduff, Siobhán
2013 Roman Theories of Translation. Surpassing the Source. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merrill, Christi
2009 Riddles of Belonging: India in Translation and Other Tales of Possession. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Paker, Saliha
2002 “Translation as Terceme and Nazire: Culture-bound Concepts and their Implications for a Conceptual Framework for Research on Ottoman Translation History.” In Cross-cultural Transgressions. Research Methods in Translation Studies, vol. 2: Historical and Ideological Issues, ed. by T. Hermans, 120–143. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
2006 “Ottoman Conception of Translation and its Practice: The 1897 “Classics Debate” as a Focus for Examining Change.” In T. Hermans (ed.), vol. 2, 325–348.Google Scholar
2009 “Turkish Tradition.” In Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, ed. by Mona Baker and Gabriela Saldanha, 550–559. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2015 “On the Poetic Practices of a “Singularity Uninventive People” and the Anxiety of Imitation: A Critical Re-appraisal in Terms of Translation, Creative Mediation and “Originality.” In Tahir Gürçağlar, et al. (eds.), Tradition, Tension and Translation in Turkey, 27–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petrilli, Susan
(ed.) 1999/2000 “La Traduzione.” Athanor X (2).Google Scholar
Prasad, G. J. V.
2009 “Caste in and Recasting Language. Tamil in Translation.” In J. Wakabayaahi and R. Kothari (eds), 17–28.Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony
2007 “On History in Formal Conceptualization of Translation.” Across Languages and Cultures 8 (2): 153–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rafael, Vicente
1988 Constructing Colonialism: Translation and Christian conversion in Tagalog society under early Spanish rule. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
2005 The Promise of the Foreign. Nationalism and the Technics of Translation in the Spanish Philippines. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 Motherless Tongues: The Insurgency of Languages Amid Wars of Translation. Durham, DC: Duke University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raine, Roberta
2014 “Translation Archaeology in Practice: Researching the History of Buddhist Translation in Tibet.” Meta 59 (2): 278–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “The Buddhist Translation. Histories of Ancient China (c. 150–1276) and Tibet (c. 617–1750). A Comparative Study.” Asian Pacific Translation and Intercultural Studies 3 (1): 2–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramakrishnan, E. V.
2009 “Translation as Resistance. The Role of Translation in the making of Malayalam Literary Tradition.” In J. Wakabayashi and R. Kothari (eds), 29–41.Google Scholar
Rao, Sathya
2010 “Naoki Sakai: penser la traduction entre l’Orient et l’Occident.” TTR 23 (1): 151–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ricci, Ronit
2010 “On the Untranslatability of ‘Translation’. Considerations from Java, Indonesia.” Translation Studies 3 (3): 287–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Douglas
2016 “Towards an Intercivilizational Turn: Naoki Sakai’s Cofigurative Regimes of Translation and the Problem of Eurocentrism.” Translation Studies 9 (1): 51–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salama-Carr, Myriam
1990 La traduction à l’époque Abbasside. Paris: Didier Erudition.Google Scholar
Sato-Rossberg, Nana, and Judy Wakabayashi
(eds) 2012 Translation and Translation Studies in the Japanese Context. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Satyanath, T. S.
2009 “Tellings and Renderings in Medieval Karnataka. The Episode of Kirata Shiva and Arjuna.” In J. Wakabayashi and R. Kothari (eds), Decentring Translation Studies. India and Beyond, 43–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semizu, Yukino
2005 “Invisible Translation: Reading Chinese Texts in Ancient Japan.” In T. Hermans (ed.), 283–295.Google Scholar
Simeoni, Daniel
2008 “Norms and the State: The Geopolitics of Translation Theory.” In Beyond Descriptive Translation Studies, ed. by A. Pym, M. Shlesinger, and D. Simeoni, 329–341. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
St André, James
2010 “Lessons from Chinese History: Translation as a Collaborative and Multi-stage Process.” TTR 23 (1): 71–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stecconi, Ubaldo
2004 “Interpretive Semiotics and Translation Theory: The Semiotic Conditions to Translation.” Semiotica 150 (1/4): 471–489.Google Scholar
2007 “Five Reasons why Semiotics is Good for Translation Studies.” In Doubts and Directions in Translation Studies, ed. by Yves Gambier, Miriam Shlesinger, and Radegundis Stolze, 15–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swann, Brian
2011 Born in the blood. On Native American Translation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tahir Gürçağlar, Şehnaz
2008 The Politics and Poetics of Translation in Turkey 1923–1960. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Tahir Gürçağlar, Şehnaz, Saliha Paker, and John Milton
(eds) 2015 Tradition, Tension and Translation in Turkey. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
① ② ③
Trivedi, Harish
2006 “In Our Own Time, in Our Own Terms: Translation in India.” In T. Hermans (ed.), Translating Others, 102–119.Google Scholar
Truschke, Audrey
2016 Culture of Encounters: Sanskrit at the Mughal Court. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tymoczko, Maria
2007 Enlarging Translation. Empowering Translators. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Valdeón, Roberto
2014 Translation and the Spanish Empire in the Americas. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wakabayashi, Judy
2005 “The Reconceptualization of Translation from Chinese in the 18th Century Japan.” In E. Hung (ed.), Translation and Cultural Change. Studies in History, Norms and Image-projection, 121–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “An Etymological Exploration of ‘Translation’ in Japan.” In J. Wakabayashi and R. Kothari (eds), Decentring Translation Studies. India and Beyond, 175–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. “Japanese Conceptualizations of ‘Translation’.” In Y. Gambier and U. Stecconi (eds)
Wakabayashi, Judy and Rita Kothari
(eds) 2009 Decentring Translation Studies. India and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
① ② ③
Wolf, Michaela
2015 The Habsburg Monarchy’s Many-Languaged Soul. Translating and Interpreting 1848–1918. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar