Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar

Experimental and corpus-based perspectives

| University of Basel
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027204394 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027268754 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
The argument structure of verbs, defined as the part of grammar that deals with how participants in verbal events are expressed in clauses, is a classical topic in linguistics that has received considerable attention in the literature. This book investigates argument structure in English from a usage-based perspective, taking the view that the cognitive representation of grammar is shaped by language use, and that crucial aspects of grammatical organization are tied to the frequency with which words and syntactic constructions are used. On the basis of several case studies combining quantitative corpus studies and psycholinguistic experiments, it is shown how a usage-based approach sheds new light on a number of issues in argument realization and offers frequency-based explanations for its organizing principles at three levels of generality: verbs, constructions, and argument structure alternations.
[Constructional Approaches to Language, 17]  2015.  x, 246 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“In this data-rich, theoretically sophisticated volume, Perek offers many new and intriguing insights into our usage-based knowledge of argument structure. Inspiring!”
“This book offers a lucid and theoretically inspiring empirical study of argument structure in English from a usage-based perspective; an absolute must-read for anyone, regardless of theoretical inclination, working on verb valency, argument structure, and alternations.”
“Within the research program of Construction Grammar, the topic of argument structure has a central place. In this book, Florent Perek takes up existing constructional research and shows how corpus-linguistic studies and experimental methods can be combined to arrive at a truly usage-based understanding of how verbs and their arguments form part of speakers' linguistic knowledge. For anybody who is interested in current constructional theory and methodology, this is required reading.”
Cited by

Cited by 67 other publications

No author info given
2016. Angebote zur Rezension. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 2016:64  pp. 167 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2016. Angebote zur Rezension. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 2016:65  pp. 255 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2016. References. Language Learning 66:S1  pp. 313 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2019. Introduction. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3  pp. 263 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2020.  In English Resultatives [Constructional Approaches to Language, 26], Crossref logo
No author info given
2020.  In Frame-Constructional Verb Classes [Constructional Approaches to Language, 28], Crossref logo
No author info given
2021.  In Cognitive Aphasiology – A Usage-Based Approach to Language in Aphasia [Constructional Approaches to Language, 31], Crossref logo
No author info given
2021.  In Corpora, Constructions, New Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 100], Crossref logo
Boas, Hans C.
2020.  In The Handbook of English Linguistics,  pp. 277 ff. Crossref logo
Busso, Lucia, Alessandro Lenci & Florent Perek
2020. Valency coercion in Italian. Constructions and Frames 12:2  pp. 171 ff. Crossref logo
Busso, Lucia, Florent Perek & Alessandro Lenci
2021. Constructional associations trump lexical associations in processing valency coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 32:2  pp. 287 ff. Crossref logo
Cappelle, Bert & Ilse Depraetere
2016. Short-circuited interpretations of modal verb constructions. Constructions and Frames 8:1  pp. 7 ff. Crossref logo
Condamines, Anne
2018. Is “to fish in a river” equivalent to “to fish a river”?. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 5:2  pp. 208 ff. Crossref logo
Dattner, Elitzur
2019. The Hebrew dative: Usage patterns as discourse profile constructions. Linguistics 57:5  pp. 1073 ff. Crossref logo
Diessel, Holger
2019.  In The Grammar Network, Crossref logo
Gedik, Tan Arda
2021. An analysis of lexicogrammatical development in English textbooks in Turkey: A usage-based construction grammar approach. ExELL 9:1  pp. 26 ff. Crossref logo
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco & Christopher S. Butler
2018. Situating Valency Theory in functional-cognitive space. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:2  pp. 348 ff. Crossref logo
Granvik, Anton
2018.  In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21],  pp. 205 ff. Crossref logo
Groom, Nicholas
2019. Construction Grammar and the corpus-based analysis of discourses. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3  pp. 291 ff. Crossref logo
Hartmann, Stefan
2019. Compound worlds and metaphor landscapes: Affixoids, allostructions, and higher-order generalizations. Word Structure 12:3  pp. 297 ff. Crossref logo
Haugen, Tor Arne
2021. When complementation gets specific: A study of collocational preferences in verb–object combinations in Norwegian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 44:1  pp. 71 ff. Crossref logo
Herbst, Thomas
2018.  In Lexical Collocation Analysis [Quantitative Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences, ],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Herbst, Thomas & Susen Faulhaber
2015. Do Constructions make a Difference? Introduction to a Special Issue of ZAA on Aspects of Construction Grammar. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 63:3  pp. 249 ff. Crossref logo
Hilpert, Martin
2018.  In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21],  pp. 21 ff. Crossref logo
Hilpert, Martin
2019. Higher-order schemas in morphology: What they are, how they work, and where to find them. Word Structure 12:3  pp. 261 ff. Crossref logo
Hilpert, Martin, Bert Cappelle & Ilse Depraetere
2021.  In Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 32],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Hoffmann, Thomas
2020. Marginal Argument Structure constructions: the [V the Ntaboo-word out of]-construction in Post-colonial Englishes. Linguistics Vanguard 6:1 Crossref logo
Hoffmann, Thomas
2020. What would it take for us to abandon Construction Grammar?. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34  pp. 148 ff. Crossref logo
Höder, Steffen
2019. Phonological schematicity in multilingual constructions: A diasystematic perspective on lexical form. Word Structure 12:3  pp. 334 ff. Crossref logo
Imo, Wolfgang
2015. Interactional Construction Grammar. Linguistics Vanguard 1:1  pp. 69 ff. Crossref logo
Inglese, Guglielmo
2021. Towards a typology of middle voice systems. Linguistic Typology 0:0 Crossref logo
Kolkmann, Julia
2019. Possessive interpretation at the semantics-pragmatics interface. Constructions and Frames 11:2  pp. 244 ff. Crossref logo
Küchenhoff, Helmut & Hans-Jörg Schmid
2015. Reply to “More (old and new) misunderstandings of collostructional analysis: On Schmid & Küchenhoff” by Stefan Th. Gries. Cognitive Linguistics 26:3  pp. 537 ff. Crossref logo
Laporte, Samantha, Tove Larsson & Larissa Goulart
2021. Testing the Principle of No Synonymy across levels of abstraction. Constructions and Frames 13:2  pp. 230 ff. Crossref logo
Liu, Meili
2022. Review of Sommerer & Smirnova (2020): Nodes and networks in diachronic Construction Grammar. Review of Cognitive Linguistics  pp. 289 ff. Crossref logo
Maekelberghe, Charlotte
2022.  In English Noun Phrases from a Functional-Cognitive Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 221],  pp. 136 ff. Crossref logo
Matusevych, Yevgen, Afra Alishahi & Ad Backus
2018. Quantifying cross-linguistic influence with a computational model. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8:5  pp. 561 ff. Crossref logo
Neels, Jakob
2020. Lifespan change in grammaticalisation as frequency-sensitive automation: William Faulkner and the let alone construction . Cognitive Linguistics 31:2  pp. 339 ff. Crossref logo
Percillier, Michael
2020.  In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],  pp. 214 ff. Crossref logo
Perek, Florent & Amanda L. Patten
2019. Towards an English Constructicon using patterns and frames. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3  pp. 354 ff. Crossref logo
Perini, Mário A.
2019.  In Thematic Relations,  pp. 47 ff. Crossref logo
Pijpops, Dirk
2020. What is an alternation?. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34  pp. 283 ff. Crossref logo
PIJPOPS, DIRK, DIRK SPEELMAN, STEFAN GRONDELAERS & FREEK VAN DE VELDE
2018. Comparing explanations for the Complexity Principle: evidence from argument realization. Language and Cognition 10:3  pp. 514 ff. Crossref logo
Pijpops, Dirk, Dirk Speelman, Freek Van de Velde & Stefan Grondelaers
2021. Incorporating the multi-level nature of the constructicon into hypothesis testing. Cognitive Linguistics 32:3  pp. 487 ff. Crossref logo
Proost, Kristel
2017.  In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58],  pp. 17 ff. Crossref logo
Romain, Laurence
2017. Measuring the alternation strength of causative verbs. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 31  pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo
Rostila, Jouni
2018.  In Changing Structures [Studies in Language Companion Series, 195],  pp. 55 ff. Crossref logo
Rosário, Ivo da Costa do
2020.  In Sociolinguística e funcionalismo: vertentes e interfaces,  pp. 103 ff. Crossref logo
Serrano, María José
2018. Managing subjectivity: Omission and expression of first-person singular object a mí in Spanish media discourse. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 63:3  pp. 423 ff. Crossref logo
Silvennoinen, Olli O.
2018. Constructional schemas in variation. Constructions and Frames 10:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Sláma, Jakub
2021. The study of valency is biased toward more frequent verbs: A corpus study of the valency of less frequent verbs in Czech. Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 72:2  pp. 434 ff. Crossref logo
Smirnova, Elena
2021.  In Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 32],  pp. 185 ff. Crossref logo
Smirnova, Elena & Lotte Sommerer
2020.  In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],  pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo
Sommerer, Lotte
2022.  In English Noun Phrases from a Functional-Cognitive Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 221],  pp. 364 ff. Crossref logo
Sommerer, Lotte & Andreas Baumann
2021. Of absent mothers, strong sisters and peculiar daughters: The constructional network of English NPN constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 32:1  pp. 97 ff. Crossref logo
Szczesniak, Konrad
2019. Variation motivated by analogy with fixed chunks. Constructions and Frames 11:1  pp. 79 ff. Crossref logo
Szcześniak, Konrad
2019. Alternations should resurface next to surface generalizations: The reflexive-prepositional alternation in Portuguese . Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12:1  pp. 205 ff. Crossref logo
Tian, Zhen
2019.  In Cognitive Linguistics and the Study of Chinese [Human Cognitive Processing, 67],  pp. 73 ff. Crossref logo
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2020. The intertwining of differentiation and attraction as exemplified by the history of recipient transfer and benefactive alternations. Cognitive Linguistics 31:4  pp. 549 ff. Crossref logo
Ungerer, Tobias
2021. Using structural priming to test links between constructions: English caused-motion and resultative sentences inhibit each other. Cognitive Linguistics 32:3  pp. 389 ff. Crossref logo
van Lier, Eva & Maria Messerschmidt
2022. Lexical restrictions on grammatical relations in voice and valency constructions. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 75:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Van Wettere, Niek
2022. The hapax / type ratio. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics Crossref logo
Wiliński, Jarosław
2021. Nouns in the Be of N-Construction: A Corpus-Based Investigation. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 66:3  pp. 747 ff. Crossref logo
Zehentner, Eva
2020. Cognitive reality of constructions as a theoretical and methodological challenge in historical linguistics. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34  pp. 371 ff. Crossref logo
Zehentner, Eva
2021. Alternations emerge and disappear: the network of dispossession constructions in the history of English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17:3  pp. 525 ff. Crossref logo
Zehentner, Eva & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2020.  In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],  pp. 168 ff. Crossref logo
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2020. A study of the development of the Chinese correlative comparative construction from the perspective of constructionalization. Diachronica 37:1  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2014048033 | Marc record