Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction
Editors
| Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, Frankfurt am Main
| University of Oxford
This is a collection of state-of-the-art papers in the field of syntactic reconstruction. It treats a range of topics which are representative of current debates in historical syntax. The novelty and merit of the present book is, the editors believe, that, in contrast to most previous work on diachronic syntax, it combines the perspectives of the traditional philological research on syntactic reconstruction with the insights of modern syntactic theory, as it is emphasised in the Foreword by Giuseppe Longobardi. The volume includes articles by well-recognized researchers in historical linguistics with a focus on syntactic change. In the present volume syntactic reconstruction is discussed from a variety of angles, including historical linguistics, phenomena of language contact, generative approaches as well as typological and variationist research. In the articles, languages from a diverse range of families are discussed, including Indo-European, North and South Caucasian, Sino-Tibetan, and Turkic.
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 302] 2008. xvii, 219 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Acknowledgments
|
vii
|
|
ix–xvii
|
|
|
1–26
|
|
|
27–72
|
|
|
73–95
|
|
|
97–119
|
|
|
121–159
|
|
|
161–186
|
|
|
187–216
|
|
|
Index
|
217–219
|
“Ferraresi and Goldbach have brought together scholars approaching syntactic reconstruction from different theoretical perspectives, and drawing data from various language families. The resulting collection mirrors the challenges and uncertainties in the ongoing debate. The volume, with such heterogeneity, marks a milestone and will be of interest to historical linguists and those interested in models of linguistic variation.”
Chiaro Gianollo, University of Konstanz, on Linguist List, Vol. 20.4367 (2009)
“[...] a very useful survey of the current issues in syntactic reconstruction. It provides a balanced picture of the different approaches, their theoretical assumptions and methodologies, the challenges they face, the types of results they can achieve, as well as the questions, doubts and problems they raise [...]”
Katalin É. Kiss, Research Institute for Linguistics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, in Diachronica Vol. 26:3 (2009).
“Linguists have long been fascinated with the question of whether and how one can reconstruct prehistoric systems. Possibilities depend on theories of variation, acquisition and change and on what one is aiming to reconstruct. Here is a well-conceived and very useful volume that explores a range of possibilities for syntax. The comparative perspective will advance our understanding of methods for reconstruction.”
David W. Lightfoot, Georgetown University
Cited by
Cited by other publications
Daniels, Don
2017. A method for mitigating the problem of borrowing in syntactic reconstruction.
Studies in Language 41:3 ► pp. 577 ff. 
Hock, Hans Henrich
2015.
In Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its Development [Benjamins Current Topics, 75],
► pp. 51 ff.
Viti, Carlotta
2015.
In Perspectives on Historical Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 169],
► pp. 1 ff.
WILLIS, DAVID
2011. Reconstructing last week's weather: Syntactic reconstruction and Brythonic free relatives.
Journal of Linguistics 47:2 ► pp. 407 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 october 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CFF – Historical & comparative linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General