Cognitive English Grammar

Günter Radden | University of Hamburg
René Dirven † | University of Duisburg-Essen
ISBN 9789027219039 (Eur) | EUR 110.00
ISBN 9781556196638 (USA) | USD 165.00
ISBN 9789027219046 (Eur) | EUR 33.00
ISBN 9781556196645 (USA) | USD 49.95
ISBN 9789027292339 | EUR 110.00/33.00*
| USD 165.00/49.95*
Google Play logo

Cognitive English Grammar is designed to be used as a textbook in courses of English and general linguistics. It introduces the reader to cognitive linguistic theory and shows that Cognitive Grammar helps us to gain a better understanding of the grammar of English. The notions of motivation and meaningfulness are central to the approach adopted in the book. In four major parts comprising 12 chapters, Cognitive English Grammar integrates recent cognitive approaches into one coherent model, allowing the analysis of the most central constructions of English. Part I presents the cognitive framework: conceptual and linguistic categories, their combination in situations, the cognitive operations applied to them, and the organisation of conceptual structures into linguistic constructions. Part II deals with the category of ‘things’ and their linguistic structuring as nouns and noun phrases. It shows how things are grounded in reality by means of reference, quantified by set and scalar quantifiers, and qualified by modifiers. Part III describes situations as temporal units of various layers: internally, as types of situations; and externally, as located relative to the time of speech and grounded in reality or potentiality. Part IV looks at situations as relational units and their structuring as sentences. Its two chapters are devoted to event schemas and space and metaphorical extensions of space.

Cognitive English Grammaroffers a wealth of linguistic data and explanations. The didactic quality is guaranteed by the frequent use of definitions and examples, a glossary of the terms used, overviews and chapter summaries, suggestions for further reading, and study questions. For the Key to Study Questions click here.

[Cognitive Linguistics in Practice, 2]  2007.  xiv, 374 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“Em suma, um livro imperdível para os que desejam fazer uma iniciação a um modelo descritivo cognitivo da gramática do inglês.”
“The usage-based approach of Cognitive English Grammar not only makes students see the relationship between thought and language, but also - and more importantly - changes their conception about language and grammar in general. As the book offers explanantions for exactly those areas of grammar which are typically difficult and confusing to learn [...], by the end of the textbook (and the course) students come to realize and understand that grammar is indeed meaningful, and this knowledge imparts them with a confidence that is very much needed for any university student either within or outside the EFL classroom.”
“By molding together major strands of cognitive linguistic theory - such as the Langackerian cognitive grammar, conceptual metaphor theory, mental space theory, and force dynamics among other - the authors have produced a textbook that represents an ideal balance between linguistic theory on the one hand, and selected areas of English grammar on the other hand.”
“This is a textbook which can be extremely useful for the teaching of cognitive grammar. It is focused on the grammar of the English language, but it uses all the important notions and research that form the core of cognitive linguistics as a discipline. Despite its purpose as a student textbook, it is extremely comprehensive, with a lot of detail and classifications which are very clearly presented with the help of tables, diagrams and summaries. [...] The result is excellent and unique. It is difficult to find drawbacks.”
“The biggest asset of this book is that up to now, it is the most comprehensive account of English grammar from a cognitive-linguistic perspective. It is well written, clearly structured, and extremely accessible. It is an excellent introductory work for students who would like to pursue cognitive linguistics studies and a valuable resource for researchers interested in studying various languages in the light of cognitive linguistics.”
“A real scholarly and pedagogical feat. It is by no means an easy task to bring together the various strands making up the thriving field of cognitive linguistics into a technically coherent and pedagogically efficient textbook in English descriptive grammar. If you are a lecturer in the subject and have long meant to use Ron Langacker’s Cognitive Grammar and other cognitive-linguistic approaches in your classes but have been held back so far by the need to reduce to course book size the sheer volume and the technical complexity of the specialized literature, this is the textbook you wanted: A systematic, student-friendly yet rigorous treatment of English descriptive grammar from a cognitive-linguistic perspective, rich in attractive illustrations and supplemented with a large number of exercises and study questions, for which a key is provided. I have used the book in my classes and it works. Absolutely recommended.”
“Radden and Dirven have produced an engaging and readable book that successfully addresses a very real need. Using notions of cognitive linguistics, it not only provides a revealing survey of English grammar but makes apparent the conceptual basis of grammatical structure. Despite its non-technical presentation, Cognitive English Grammar shows considerable technical sophistication, covering central topics in reasonable depth and offering some new descriptive insights. This text should prove both useful and illuminating.”
Cited by

Cited by 185 other publications

No author info given
2008. PUBLICATIONS RECEIVED. English Language and Linguistics 12:1  pp. 211 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2014.  In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. xi ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2014.  In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17], Crossref logo
No author info given
2014.  In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. vii ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2014.  In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 237 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2014.  In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 253 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2014.  In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], Crossref logo
No author info given
2014.  In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157], Crossref logo
No author info given
2017.  In How Grammar Links Concepts [Human Cognitive Processing, 57], Crossref logo
No author info given
2018.  In Landscape and Culture – Cross-linguistic Perspectives [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 9], Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Agreement in Language Contact [Studies in Language Companion Series, 208], Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Reference Point and Case [Human Cognitive Processing, 68], Crossref logo
No author info given
2019.  In Semantic Plurality [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 349], Crossref logo
No author info given
2021.  In Corpora, Constructions, New Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 100], Crossref logo
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2021. The multimodal recycling machine: toward a cognitive-pragmatic theory of the text/image production. Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics 12:3  pp. 207 ff. Crossref logo
Aguilar-Guevara, Ana, Bert Le Bruyn & Joost Zwarts
2014.  In Weak Referentiality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 219],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017.  In Advances in Cultural Linguistics [Cultural Linguistics, ],  pp. 111 ff. Crossref logo
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2020.  In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9],  pp. 92 ff. Crossref logo
Athanasopoulos, Panos & Emanuel Bylund
2013. Does Grammatical Aspect Affect Motion Event Cognition? A Cross-Linguistic Comparison of English and Swedish Speakers. Cognitive Science 37:2  pp. 286 ff. Crossref logo
Baeskow, Heike
2020.  In Complex Words,  pp. 82 ff. Crossref logo
Bagasheva, Alexandra
2014.  In Multilingual Cognition and Language Use [Human Cognitive Processing, 44],  pp. 97 ff. Crossref logo
Baicchi, Annalisa
2017. Emotions travelling across cultures. International Journal of Language and Culture 4:1  pp. 24 ff. Crossref logo
Baicchi, Annalisa
2022.  In Figurativity and Human Ecology [Figurative Thought and Language, 17],  pp. 151 ff. Crossref logo
Ballesteros-Lintao, Rachelle, Maria Regina P. Arriero, Judith Ma. Angelica S. Claustro, Kristina Isabelle U. Dichoso, Selenne Anne S. Leynes, Maria Rosario R. Aranda & Jean Reintegrado-Celino
2016. Deontic meanings in Philippine contracts . International Journal of Legal Discourse 1:2  pp. 421 ff. Crossref logo
Beekhuizen, Barend & Sandra A Thompson
2022. ‘Something that’s very American’: The interactional role of Light-Head Relative Clauses. Discourse Studies 24:2  pp. 149 ff. Crossref logo
Benczes, Réka
2015. “Cognitive Linguistics is fun”. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:2  pp. 479 ff. Crossref logo
Benczes, Réka
2019.  In Rhyme over Reason, Crossref logo
Benczes, Réka, Kate Burridge, Farzad Sharifian & Keith Allan
2017.  In Advances in Cultural Linguistics [Cultural Linguistics, ],  pp. 607 ff. Crossref logo
Berg, Thomas
2016. The Semantic Structure of English and German Compounds: Same or Different?. Studia Neophilologica 88:2  pp. 148 ff. Crossref logo
Bernabe, Jean
2012. Submorphémique et sémiophonie créole. Miranda :7 Crossref logo
Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó
2017.  In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],  pp. 126 ff. Crossref logo
Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó
2017. On constructional blocking of metonymies. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1  pp. 183 ff. Crossref logo
Brenda, Maria
2016. The grammar and semantics of near. CogniTextes 14:Volume 14 Crossref logo
Brenda, Maria
2017. A cognitive perspective on the semantics of near . Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1  pp. 121 ff. Crossref logo
Bromhead, Helen
2011. The Bushin Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 31:4  pp. 445 ff. Crossref logo
Bromhead, Helen
2022. Tensions in talking about disasters: Habitual versus climate-informed – The case of bushfire vocabulary in Australia. Australian Journal of Linguistics  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Brown, Derek J.
2015. Approaching the Grammatical Count/Mass Distinction From a Multimodal Perspective. TESOL Quarterly 49:3  pp. 601 ff. Crossref logo
Browse, Sam
2014.  In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 69 ff. Crossref logo
Brucale, Luisa & Egle Mocciaro
2016.  In Embodiment in Latin Semantics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 174],  pp. 85 ff. Crossref logo
Bui, Hung Phu
2022. Vietnamese EFL Students’ Use and Misconceptions of Cohesive Devices in Writing. SAGE Open 12:3  pp. 215824402211269 ff. Crossref logo
Bylund, Emanuel, Pascal Gygax, Steven Samuel & Panos Athanasopoulos
2020. Back to the future? The role of temporal focus for mapping time onto space. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 73:2  pp. 174 ff. Crossref logo
2011. L2 effects on L1 event conceptualization. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14:1  pp. 47 ff. Crossref logo
2019. The use of heaps as quantifier and intensifier in New Zealand English. English Language and Linguistics 23:3  pp. 531 ff. Crossref logo
Cetnarowska, Bozena
2022.  In Paradigms in Word Formation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 225],  pp. 99 ff. Crossref logo
Chang, Feng-Ru
2019. An examination of the self-presentation of the top five franchised English buxibans in Taiwan. Research in Comparative and International Education 14:4  pp. 450 ff. Crossref logo
Christou, Spyros, Llorenç Andreu, Carmen Julia Coloma, Ernesto Guerra, Claudia Araya, Javier Rodriguez-Ferreiro & Monica Sanz-Torrent
2022. Insights from real-time comprehension of Spanish verbal tense in children with developmental language disorder: An eye-tracking study. Applied Psycholinguistics 43:3  pp. 641 ff. Crossref logo
Cuadrado Esclápez, Georgina
Danylchenko, Iryna, Yana Zhovinsky, T. Andrienko, S. Potapenko & L. Slavova
2021. Construction as basic translation unit: A case of referring to blind people in English and Ukrainian. SHS Web of Conferences 105  pp. 03003 ff. Crossref logo
De Knop, Sabine
2010. German constructions with complex prepositional groups introduced by bis. CogniTextes 5:Volume 5 Crossref logo
De Knop, Sabine
2020. From construction grammar to embodied construction practice. Constructions and Frames 12:1  pp. 121 ff. Crossref logo
De Knop, Sabine
2022.  In Construction Grammar across Borders [Benjamins Current Topics, 122],  pp. 119 ff. Crossref logo
Denroche, Charles
2021. The Three Grammars and the sign. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:1  pp. 206 ff. Crossref logo
Deshors, Sandra C.
2018. Does the passé composé influence L2 learners’ use of English past tenses?. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:1  pp. 23 ff. Crossref logo
Dichtel, Frédéric
2016. A quantifier used on many occasions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:1  pp. 80 ff. Crossref logo
Dolgova, Natalia & Andrea Tyler
2019.  In Second Handbook of English Language Teaching [Springer International Handbooks of Education, ],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Dolgova, Natalia & Andrea Tyler
2019.  In Second Handbook of English Language Teaching [Springer International Handbooks of Education, ],  pp. 939 ff. Crossref logo
Drożdż, Grzegorz
2016.  In Studies in Lexicogrammar [Human Cognitive Processing, 54],  pp. 95 ff. Crossref logo
Druzhinin, Andrei Sergeevich & Svetlana Andreevna Pesina
2018. ORIENTATIONAL FUNCTION OF THE ENGLISH ARTICLE. Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice :4-1  pp. 85 ff. Crossref logo
Evans, Vyvyan
2012. Cognitive linguistics. WIREs Cognitive Science 3:2  pp. 129 ff. Crossref logo
Fabiszak, Malgorzata, Anna Hebda, Iwona Kokorniak & Karolina Krawczak
2014.  In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43],  pp. 223 ff. Crossref logo
Farsi, Roghayeh
2019. Positioning Strategies and Representation in Fictional Autobiography:The Sense of an Ending. Anglia 137:1  pp. 84 ff. Crossref logo
Fonteyn, Lauren & Charlotte Maekelberghe
2018. Competing motivations in the diachronic nominalization of English gerunds. Diachronica 35:4  pp. 487 ff. Crossref logo
Franceschi, Daniele
2014. Licensing and blocking factors in the use of BEGIN verbs. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:2  pp. 304 ff. Crossref logo
Gardelle, Laure
2017. Are superordinates such as furniture and belongings collective nouns?. Lingvisticae Investigationes 40:2  pp. 150 ff. Crossref logo
Gatambuki Gathigia, Moses, Ruth W. Ndung’u & Daniel Ochieng Orwenjo
2015. When romantic love in Gĩkũyũ becomes a human body part. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 2:1  pp. 79 ff. Crossref logo
Ghesquière, Lobke
2021. “A Good Deal of Intensity”: On the Development of Degree and Quantity Modifier Good. Journal of English Linguistics 49:2  pp. 159 ff. Crossref logo
Ghio, Gilbert
2014. Temporalité et aspectualité en anglais : opérations, représentations, cognition. Corela :12-1 Crossref logo
Giovanelli, Marcello
2014.  In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 145 ff. Crossref logo
Glynn, Dylan
2022.  In Analogy and Contrast in Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 73],  pp. 245 ff. Crossref logo
Grisot, Cristina
2018.  In Cohesion, Coherence and Temporal Reference from an Experimental Corpus Pragmatics Perspective [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, ],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Grisot, Cristina, Bruno Cartoni & Jacques Moeschler
2016.  In Relevance Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 268],  pp. 103 ff. Crossref logo
Grisot, Cristina & Jacques Moeschler
2014.  In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 2],  pp. 7 ff. Crossref logo
Grisot, Cristina & Juan Sun
2021.  In Time in Languages, Languages in Time [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 101],  pp. 95 ff. Crossref logo
Guerrero Medina, Pilar
2020. Meaning construction and motivation in the English benefactive double object construction. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1  pp. 94 ff. Crossref logo
Gánem-Gutiérrez, Gabriela Adela & Haliza Harun
2011. Verbalisation as a mediational tool for understanding tense-aspect marking in English: an application of Concept-Based Instruction. Language Awareness 20:2  pp. 99 ff. Crossref logo
2021. Yoga instructions in Polish and Russian as directive speech acts: a cognitive linguistic perspective. Language and Cognition 13:4  pp. 613 ff. Crossref logo
Hamilton, Craig A.
2014.  In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 195 ff. Crossref logo
Harrison, Chloe
2014.  In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo
Harrison, Chloe, Louise Nuttall, Peter Stockwell & Wenjuan Yuan
2014.  In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Hart, Christopher
2015. VIEWPOINT IN LINGUISTIC DISCOURSE. Critical Discourse Studies 12:3  pp. 238 ff. Crossref logo
Hart, Christopher & Bodo Winter
2022. Gesture and legitimation in the anti-immigration discourse of Nigel Farage. Discourse & Society 33:1  pp. 34 ff. Crossref logo
Harun, Haliza, Norhana Abdullah, Nursyuhada’ Ab Wahab & Nurkhamimi Zainuddin
2019. Concept Based Instruction: Enhancing Grammar Competence in L2 Learners. RELC Journal 50:2  pp. 252 ff. Crossref logo
Herbst, Thomas & Peter Uhrig
2020. The issue of specifying slots in argument structure constructions in terms of form and meaning. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34  pp. 135 ff. Crossref logo
Ho-Cheong Leung, Alex & Wim van der Wurff
2018.  In The Noun Phrase in English [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 246],  pp. 143 ff. Crossref logo
Hounhouayenou-Toffa, Ernest
2017. Defamiliarizing reality: AS IF and SEEM in Ben Okri’s The Famished Road. Etudes de stylistique anglaise :11  pp. 115 ff. Crossref logo
2018. Moving along paths in space and time. Journal of Linguistics 54:4  pp. 721 ff. Crossref logo
Infante, Paolo & Matthew E. Poehner
2022.  In New Perspectives on Material Mediation in Language Learner Pedagogy [Educational Linguistics, 56],  pp. 111 ff. Crossref logo
Jahan, Akhter & Judit Kormos
2015. The impact of textual enhancement on EFL learners' grammatical awareness of future plans and intentions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 25:1  pp. 46 ff. Crossref logo
Jurado, Alejandro Barrena
2018. A study on the ‘wordgasm’: the nature of blends’ splinters. Lexis :14 Crossref logo
Kaleta, Agnieszka
2020.  In Cultural Conceptualizations in Language and Communication [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],  pp. 275 ff. Crossref logo
Karczewski, Daniel
2022.  In Wissenschaften und ihr Dialog,  pp. 231 ff. Crossref logo
Kermer, Franka
2020. A Cognitive Grammar Perspective on Temporal Conceptualization in SLA. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 55:s1  pp. 223 ff. Crossref logo
Khor, Su Yin
2020.  In The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Kleinke, Sonja & Birte Bös
2018.  In The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 78],  pp. 153 ff. Crossref logo
Kokorniak, Iwona
2022.  In Analogy and Contrast in Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 73],  pp. 115 ff. Crossref logo
Kokorniak, Iwona & Malgorzata Fabiszak
2014.  In Grammaticalization – Theory and Data [Studies in Language Companion Series, 162],  pp. 109 ff. Crossref logo
Kokorniak, Iwona & Alicja Jajko-Siwek
2018. Expressing i think that in Polish. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:1  pp. 229 ff. Crossref logo
Kong, Lingcui & Niyun Lu
2022. English Tense Teaching in Secondary Schools Based on the Perspective of Embodied-Cognitive Linguistics. International Journal of Education and Humanities 6:1  pp. 78 ff. Crossref logo
Kwiatkowska, Alina
2014.  In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 213 ff. Crossref logo
Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer
2020.  In Complex Words, Crossref logo
Lahey, Ernestine
2015. remember and forget in Dan Brown’s Angels and Demons: A corpus-informed account. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 24:4  pp. 292 ff. Crossref logo
Langacker, Ronald W.
2014.  In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. xiii ff. Crossref logo
Lapaire, Jean-Rémi
2017. Grammaire cognitive des prépositions : épistémologie et applications. Corela :HS-22 Crossref logo
Lapaire, Jean-Rémi
2017. Verbes et constructions verbales en grammaire cognitive : la prédication autrement. Corela :HS-22 Crossref logo
2012. Grammar Dilemma: Teaching Grammar as a Resource for Making Meaning. The Modern Language Journal 96:2  pp. 270 ff. Crossref logo
Liu, Dilin & Lei Lei
2017.  In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Liu, Dilin & Hongwei Zhan
2015. The Use of the -Free Compound and Free of and Free From Phrasal Constructions. Journal of English Linguistics 43:3  pp. 201 ff. Crossref logo
Liu, Dilin & Hongwei Zhan
2018.  In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Maekelberghe, Charlotte & Liesbet Heyvaert
2016. Indefinite Nominal Gerunds, or the Particularization of a Reified Event. English Studies 97:3  pp. 317 ff. Crossref logo
Mair, Christian
2012.  In English and American Studies,  pp. 413 ff. Crossref logo
Martirosyan, Anush
Miró-Sastre, Ignasi
2018. Combining Metaphors: From Metaphoric Amalgams to Binary Systems. Australian Journal of Linguistics 38:1  pp. 81 ff. Crossref logo
Mori, Souma
2019. A Cognitive Analysis of the PrepositionOVER: Image-schema transformations and metaphorical extensions. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 64:3  pp. 444 ff. Crossref logo
Morras, Javier & Antonio Barcelona
2019. Conceptual structuring of the English prepositions between, among, and amid, and their Spanish equivalent entre . Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:1  pp. 103 ff. Crossref logo
Nagy, Gábor Tolcsvai
2020. The application of functional cognitive linguistic pedagogy under the conditions of linguistic minorities. Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 71:3  pp. 373 ff. Crossref logo
Neary, Clara
2014.  In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 117 ff. Crossref logo
Newby, David
2015. The role of theory in pedagogical grammar: A Cognitive + Communicative approach. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics 1:2  pp. 13 ff. Crossref logo
Nuttall, Louise
2014.  In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Oakley, Todd
2014.  In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 231 ff. Crossref logo
Omero, Paolo, Massimiliano Valotto, Riccardo Bellana, Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni, Andrzej Zuczkowski & Carlo Tasso
2020. Writer’s uncertainty identification in scientific biomedical articles: a tool for automatic if-clause tagging. Language Resources and Evaluation 54:4  pp. 1161 ff. Crossref logo
O’Connell, Daniel C. & Sabine Kowal
2012.  In Dialogical Genres,  pp. 107 ff. Crossref logo
Paradis, Carita
2012.  In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, Crossref logo
Park, Chongwon
2013. Setting and location. Constructions and Frames 5:2  pp. 192 ff. Crossref logo
Park, Chongwon
2014. Reference-point and blending in Korean non-nominative subject constructions. Studies in Language 38:4  pp. 717 ff. Crossref logo
Patterson, Ashley N.
2016. ‘We'll be fine until our kid goes to school’: biraciality and discourse inTia & Tamera. Critical Discourse Studies 13:2  pp. 210 ff. Crossref logo
Philip, Gill
2018.  In The Corpus Linguistics Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 87],  pp. 127 ff. Crossref logo
Pincombe, Mike
2014.  In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 161 ff. Crossref logo
Pleyer, Michael & Christian W. Schneider
2014.  In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo
Poehner, Matthew E. & Paolo Infante
2017. Mediated Development: A Vygotskian Approach to Transforming Second Language Learner Abilities. TESOL Quarterly 51:2  pp. 332 ff. Crossref logo
Polzenhagen, Frank
2022.  In Figurative Thought and Language in Action [Figurative Thought and Language, 16],  pp. 113 ff. Crossref logo
Päivärinta, Anne
2014.  In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 133 ff. Crossref logo
Radden, Günter
2016. In Memoriam René Dirven. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:2  pp. v ff. Crossref logo
Roehr-Brackin, Karen, Gabriela Adela Gánem-Gutiérrez, Lexa Olivera-Smith & María Teresa Torres-Marín
2021. Are individual differences in cognitive abilities and stylistic preferences related to multilingual adults’ performance in explicit learning conditions?. Language Awareness 30:4  pp. 391 ff. Crossref logo
Romain, Laurence, Adnane Ez-zizi, Petar Milin & Dagmar Divjak
2022. What makes the past perfect and the future progressive? Experiential coordinates for a learnable, context-based model of tense and aspect. Cognitive Linguistics 33:2  pp. 251 ff. Crossref logo
Romano, Manuela
2017. Are similes and metaphors interchangeable?. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Romero Muñoz, Eloy
2022.  In English Language Teaching [English Language Teaching: Theory, Research and Pedagogy, ],  pp. 257 ff. Crossref logo
Romo Simón, Francisco
2015. La imagen metalingüística de ser y. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 28:1  pp. 234 ff. Crossref logo
Rotgé, Wilfrid
2014. Pourquoi la grammaire ? Pourquoi la grammaire anglaise à un public LANSAD ?. Recherche et pratiques pédagogiques en langues de spécialité - Cahiers de l APLIUT :Vol. XXXIII N° 3  pp. 14 ff. Crossref logo
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J. & Ignasi Miró Sastre
2019. On the cognitive grounding of agent-deprofiling constructions as a case of pretense constructions. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:2  pp. 573 ff. Crossref logo
2016. Figurative and non-figurative motion in the expression of result in English. Language and Cognition 8:1  pp. 32 ff. Crossref logo
Sabar, Nadav
2019.  In Columbia School Linguistics in the 21st Century [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 77],  pp. 33 ff. Crossref logo
Sambre, Paul & Cornelia Wermuth
2015.  In Handbook of Terminology [Handbook of Terminology, 1],  pp. 101 ff. Crossref logo
Schulze, Rainer
2015.  In The Exercise of Power in Communication,  pp. 17 ff. Crossref logo
Shanmuganathan, Thilagavathi
2021. Cultural Conceptualization of Tamil Hindu Marriages. International Journal of Language and Culture 8:2  pp. 323 ff. Crossref logo
Shannon, George J., James M. Levett, Steven M. Corns & Donald C. Wunsch
2017.  In 2017 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI),  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Smutný, Milan
2018. Terminology as a Specific Carrier of Information. Prague Journal of English Studies 7:1  pp. 143 ff. Crossref logo
Soler Gallego, Silvia
2018. Audio descriptive guides in art museums. Translation and Interpreting Studies 13:2  pp. 230 ff. Crossref logo
Song, Xin, Wolfgang Schnotz & Constanze Juchem-Grundmann
2015.  In Multidisciplinary Research on Teaching and Learning,  pp. 109 ff. Crossref logo
Stadnik, Katarzyna
2016. Linguistic Modality and Female Identity in Chaucer’s Clerk’s Tale. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 51:2  pp. 45 ff. Crossref logo
Stockwell, Peter
2014.  In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 17 ff. Crossref logo
Strauss, Susan, Heesun Chang & Jungwan Yoon
2018.  In Language Learning, Discourse and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 64],  pp. 85 ff. Crossref logo
Strugielska, Ariadna & Katarzyna Piątkowska
2017. A plea for a socio-cognitive perspective on the language-culture-cognition nexus in educational approaches to intercultural communicative competence. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1  pp. 224 ff. Crossref logo
Sudharshana, N. P.
2018.  In The Idea and Practice of Reading,  pp. 141 ff. Crossref logo
Sudharshana, N. P.
2021.  In Task-Based Language Teaching and Assessment,  pp. 163 ff. Crossref logo
Szymański, Leszek
2021. A corpus-based analysis of the modalcanwith the perfect in American English from a synchronic and diachronic perspective. Studia Neophilologica 93:3  pp. 287 ff. Crossref logo
Tabakowska, Elżbieta
2014.  In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 101 ff. Crossref logo
Tabakowska, Elżbieta
2020.  In Operationalizing Iconicity [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 17],  pp. 154 ff. Crossref logo
Taniguchi, T., D. Mochihashi, T. Nagai, S. Uchida, N. Inoue, I. Kobayashi, T. Nakamura, Y. Hagiwara, N. Iwahashi & T. Inamura
2019. Survey on frontiers of language and robotics. Advanced Robotics 33:15-16  pp. 700 ff. Crossref logo
ten Wolde, Elnora & Evelien Keizer
2016. Structure and substance in functional discourse grammar: the case of the binominal noun phrase. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 48:1  pp. 134 ff. Crossref logo
Torregrosa, G. & S. Sánchez-Reyes
2015. Raising Metaphor Awareness in English for Law Enforcement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 212  pp. 304 ff. Crossref logo
Trim, Richard
2021. Poetic Symbols of Unlimited Time. Proceedings of the 14th World Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies (IASS/AIS) 6  pp. 17 ff. Crossref logo
Tsang, Art
2017. Judgement of countability and plural marking in English by native and non-native English speakers. Language Awareness 26:4  pp. 343 ff. Crossref logo
Tsaroucha, Efthymia
2019. Figuration, constructions and English phrasal verbs: The instances of come up . ExELL 7:2  pp. 94 ff. Crossref logo
Tyrkkö, Jukka
2014.  In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 243],  pp. 157 ff. Crossref logo
Ullmann, Stefanie
2019. Epistemic stancetaking and speaker objectification in a spatio-cognitive discourse world. Journal of Language and Politics 18:3  pp. 393 ff. Crossref logo
Valdés Miyares, J. Rubén
2019. The Functions of Anglo-Saxon Poetry: An Old English Text Typology. English Studies 100:7  pp. 739 ff. Crossref logo
Vardi, Ruti
2015. ‘I’m dying on you’. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:1  pp. 28 ff. Crossref logo
Vassilaki, Evgenia
2017.  In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],  pp. 106 ff. Crossref logo
Verhulst, An & Liesbet Heyvaert
2015. Root Modal Uses ofShould, Ought toandBe Supposed toin Present-Day English: From Patterns and Profiles to Proficiency Guidelines. English Studies 96:5  pp. 562 ff. Crossref logo
Vogiatzis, Anastasios
2022. Valenced Metaphors in Strategic Communication: The Case of the Greek Economic Crisis. International Journal of Strategic Communication 16:1  pp. 18 ff. Crossref logo
Wen, Xu, Kun Yang & Fangtao Kuang
2014. Cognitive Linguistics. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1:2  pp. 155 ff. Crossref logo
Wiliński, Jarosław
2020. The preposition under and its noun collocates in the under-NOUN pattern: A quantitative corpus-based investigation. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :31(4)  pp. 23 ff. Crossref logo
Wiliński, Jarosław
2021. Nouns in the Be of N-Construction: A Corpus-Based Investigation. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 66:3  pp. 747 ff. Crossref logo
Wiraszka, Łukasz
2022. Active verbs with inanimate, text-denoting subjects in Polish and English abstracts of research articles in linguistics. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 0:0 Crossref logo
Wold, Stephanie Hazel
2019.  In English Didactics in Norway,  pp. 118 ff. Crossref logo
Xiang, Xuehua
2019.  In Columbia School Linguistics in the 21st Century [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 77],  pp. 259 ff. Crossref logo
Xie, Zhiguo
2012. The modal uses of de and temporal shifting in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21:4  pp. 387 ff. Crossref logo
Xing, Xiaoyu, Yubo Zhang & Lifang Chen
2015. Cognitive Grounding and Its Adaptability to Chinese Noun Studies. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 5:2  pp. 336 ff. Crossref logo
Xu, Xinhui & Hongwei Zhan
2022. Narrating the Past in Different Contexts: C-BI Approach to the Present Perfect and Past Simple. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 45:4  pp. 566 ff. Crossref logo
Yuan, Wenjuan
2014.  In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17],  pp. 177 ff. Crossref logo
Zhan, Hongwei
2017. Zhang, N. (2015). Cognitive Chinese grammar . Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1  pp. 297 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Keding
2014. A Cognitive Grammar approach to the SLocPAdjC in Mandarin Chinese. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1:2  pp. 218 ff. Crossref logo
Zhao, Helen & Jason Fan
2021. Modeling Input Factors in Second Language Acquisition of the English Article Construction. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo
Zwarts, Joost
2014.  In Weak Referentiality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 219],  pp. 265 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2007012165 | Marc record