Discourse and Political Culture

The language of the Third Way in Germany and the UK

| University of Southampton
Hardbound – Available
ISBN 9789027204219 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book –
ISBN 9789027262042 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
This book presents a new approach to comparative politico-linguistic discourse analysis. It takes a transdisciplinary stance and combines analytical tools from linguistic discourse analysis (keywords, metaphors, argumentation, genre) and political science (political culture, comparative politics, ideologies). It is comprehensive in its introduction of approaches from the German tradition of politico-linguistics. This tradition has not, thus far, been accessible to a non-German speaking readership and hence the volume adds insights into the mechanics of political discourse from a diverse set of viewpoints.

The book analyses the modernisation discourses in social democratic parties in Britain and Germany between 1994 and 2003, a project that was named ‘Third Way’. It demonstrates how political language and political culture are related and how politicians will adapt a global ideology to local political circumstances in order to convince the electorate. At the same time, the book presents new insights into the German political culture and the version of Third Way discourses in the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) under the leadership of Gerhard Schröder which have played a key role in shaping current political discourse in Germany. It concludes with a model for the study of political discourse which makes the work relevant to scholars in Social Sciences and beyond.
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 86]  2019.  xviii, 298 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.86
Table of Contents
List of tables
xi–xii
List of figures
xiii–xiv
List of abbreviations
xv–xvi
Acknowledgements
xvii–xviii
Chapter 1. Introduction
1–8
Chapter 2. Elements of Comparative Politico-Linguistic Discourse Analysis
9–30
Chapter 3. Contexts of the Third Way in Germany and the UK
31–68
Chapter 4. Texts in context: Register and genre in the discourses of the Third Way
69–100
Chapter 5. Lexical strategies in the discourses of the Third Way
101–168
Chapter 6. The argumentative structure of party-political discourse in the discourses of ‘new Labour’ and ‘Die Neue Mitte’
169–206
Chapter 7. New politics, new metaphor?
207–248
Chapter 8. Conclusions: Political cultures and the political discourses
249–264
Appendix: Short Biographies of Political Actors
265–268
References
269–292
Name index
293–294
Subject index
295–298
“This book presents an innovative linguistic approach to compare the political discourses and cultures of Germany and the UK. Taking into consideration the different political contexts throughout the discussion of the Third Way discourses, it should appeal to a broad audience from linguists to social and political scientists.”
“Kranert’s study represents an important contribution to comparative political discourse analysis, combining approaches from different research traditions and offering an in-depth analysis that covers context, genre, argumentation strategies and linguistic features alike. While the study and its findings are of clear historical interest, the model of political discourse analysis that Kranert develops is applicable to a broad range of present and future contexts.”
“Kranert's study shows in convincing and very valuable ways how the contexts of different political cultures shape respective discourses and what linguistic analyses can contribute to comparative studies of polity and politics.”
“Kranert’s well written analysis offers interesting findings concerning the ‘Third Way’-discourse in general as well as theoretical implications for future research. [...] Kranert’s book thus poses a valuable contribution and will hopefully stimulate further research at the intersection of linguistics and political science.”
References

References

Primary Sources (Data)

Beste, Ralf
1997 “Neues SPD-Profil durch neuen Wirtschaftkurs.” Berliner Zeitung, December 2. Accessed September 30, 2014. http://​www​.berliner​-zeitung​.de​/archiv​/neues​-spd​-profil​-durch​-neuen​-wirtschaftkurs,10810590,9370012,view,printVersion​.html.Google Scholar
Biedenkopf, Kurt
1973 “Bericht des Generalsekretärs.” In 22. Bundesparteitag der Christlich Demokratischen Union Deutschlands: Niederschrift, edited by CDU.Google Scholar
Blair, Tony
1987 “A breakdown in communication.” The Times, November 24.Google Scholar
1995a “Leader‘s Speech, Blackpool 1994.” In Report of Conference: Annual Conference 1994, Special Conference 1995, edited by The Labour Party, 97–106. London: Labour Party. http://​www​.britishpoliticalspeech​.org​/speech​-archive​.htm​?speech​=200.Google Scholar
1995b “Leader‘s Speech, Brighton 1995.” In Conference Report: Ninety-Fourth Annual Conference of the Labour Party (1995), edited by The Labour Party, 95–104. London: Labour Party. http://​www​.britishpoliticalspeech​.org​/speech​-archive​.htm​?speech​=201.Google Scholar
1995c “Speech to the Special Conference 1995.” In Report of Conference: Annual Conference 1994, Special Conference 1995, edited by The Labour Party, 289–292. London: Labour Party.Google Scholar
1996a “Leader‘s Speech, Blackpool 1996.” In The Labour Party Conference Verbatim Report, edited by The Labour Party, 80–87. London: Labour Party. http://​www​.britishpoliti​-calspeech​.org​/speech​-archive​.htm​?speech​=202.Google Scholar
1996b New Britain: My Vision of a Young Country. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
1996c “Speech given at Ruskin College, Oxford: December 16th 1996.” http://​www​.leeds​.ac​.uk​/educol​/documents​/000000084​.htm.
1997 “Leader‘s Speech, Brighton 1997.” In The Labour Party Conference Verbatim Report, edited by The Labour Party, 68–73. London: Labour Party. http://​www​.britishpoliti​-calspeech​.org​/speech​-archive​.htm​?speech​=203.Google Scholar
1999 Facing the Modern Challenge: the Third Way in Britain and South Africa: Speech in Cape Town, South Africa, January 1999.Google Scholar
Blair, Tony, and Gerhard Schröder
1999 Europe: The Third Way/Die Neue Mitte. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Accessed January 02, 2013. http://​library​.fes​.de​/pdf​-files​/bueros​/suedaf​-rika​/02828​.pdf.Google Scholar
The Independent
1996 “Blair’s Covenant: to Create an Era of Achievement.” October 3. Accessed October 16, 2014. http://​www​.independent​.co​.uk​/news​/blairs​-covenant​-to​-create​-an​-era​-of​-achievement​-1355362​.html.Google Scholar
CDU-Bundesgeschäftsstelle, and CSU Landesleitung
1998 1998–2002 Wahlplattform von CDU und CSU.Google Scholar
Conservative Party
1997 You Can Only Be Sure with the Conservatives: The Conservative Manifesto 1997. London: Conservative Central Office.Google Scholar
2000a “Conservative Party General Election Manifesto 1987: The Next Moves Forward.” In Conservative Party general election manifestos, 1900–1997, edited by Iain Dale, 311–351. London, New York: Routledge; Politico‘s Pub.Google Scholar
2000b “Conservative Party General Election Manifesto 1992: The Best Future for Britain.” In Conservative Party general election manifestos, 1900–1997, edited by Iain Dale, 353–418. London, New York: Routledge; Politico‘s Pub.Google Scholar
2000c “Conservative Party General Election Manifesto 1997: You Can Only Be Sure with the Conservatives.” In Conservative Party general election manifestos, 1900–1997, edited by Iain Dale, 419–461. London, New York: Routledge; Politico‘s Pub.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony
1998 The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hattersley, Roy
2001 “It‘s No Longer My Party.” The Observer, June 24. Accessed April 16, 2015. http://​gu​.com​/p​/xxkm4​/sbl.Google Scholar
Herzog, Roman
1997 “Aufbruch ins 21. Jahrhundert: Berliner Rede 1997 von Bundespräsident Roman Herzog.” Accessed January 29, 2014. http://​www​.bundespraesident​.de​/SharedDocs​/Reden​/DE​/Roman​-Herzog​/Reden​/1997​/04​/19970426​_Rede​.html.
Hofmann, Gunter
1997 “Tony Blair, die SPD und die Moderne: Die Sozialdemokraten können vom Labour-Chef eine Menge lernen. Sie müssen es allerdings wollen.” Die ZEIT, May 9. 20. http://​www​.zeit​.de​/1997​/20​/Tony​_Blair​_die​_SPD​_und​_die​_Moderne.Google Scholar
Hombach, Bodo
1998 Aufbruch: Die Politik der neuen Mitte. München: Econ.Google Scholar
2000 The politics of the new centre. Cambridge, Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Klimmt, Reinhard
1999 “Innovation und Gerechtigkeit: Reinhard Klimmts Brief an den SPD-Bundesvorstand vom 28. Juli 1999.” Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik (9): 1135–1140.Google Scholar
Knaup, Horand, Jürgen Leinemann, Hendrik Munsberg, Elisabeth Niejahr, Christian Reiermann, and Hajo Schumacher
1999 “Kraftmensch im Kanzleramt.” Der Spiegel 1999 26.Google Scholar
Lafontaine, Oskar
1997 “Rede des Parteivorsitzenden.” In Protokoll Parteitag Hannover, edited by Vorstand der SPD, 31–70.Google Scholar
1998a “Rede des Parteivorsitzenden.” In Die Kraft des Neuen: Protokoll Wahlparteitag Leipzig 17. April 1998, edited by Vorstand der SPD, 71–81.Google Scholar
1998b “Rede des Parteivorsitzenden.” In Innovation und Gerechtigkeit. Deutschland erneuern. Protokoll Parteitag Bonn 25. Oktober 1998, edited by Vorstand der SPD, 17–35.Google Scholar
1999 Das Herz schlägt links. München: Econ.Google Scholar
Mandelson, Peter, and Roger Liddle
1996 The Blair Revolution: Can New Labour Deliver? London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Schröder, Gerhard
1997 “Innovationen Für Deutschland.” In Protokoll Parteitag Hannover, edited by Vorstand der SPD, 719–737.Google Scholar
1998a “Die Kraft des Neuen: Rede auf dem Wahlparteitag der SPD in Leipzig, 17. April 1998.” In Die Kraft des Neuen: Protokoll Wahlparteitag Leipzig 17. April 1998, edited by Vorstand der SPD, 19–54.Google Scholar
1998b “Rede Gerhard Schröder.” In Innovation und Gerechtigkeit. Deutschland erneuern. Protokoll Parteitag Bonn 25. Oktober 1998, edited by Vorstand der SPD, 36–47.Google Scholar
2000 “Die zivile Bürgergesellschaft: Anregungen zu einer Neubestimmung der Aufgaben von Staat und Gesellschaft.” Neue Gesellschaft/ Frankfurter Hefte (3): 201–208.Google Scholar
2003a “Rede des Parteivorsitzenden: Das Wichtige tun.” In Das Wichtige Tun. Bundesparteitag Bochum 2003, edited by SPD Parteivorstand, 47–68.Google Scholar
2003b “Rede des Parteivorsitzenden Gerhard Schröder.” In Außerordentlicher Bundesparteitag: Agenda 2010, edited by Vorstand der SPD, 13–27.Google Scholar
Schröder, Gerhard, and Tony Blair
1999 Der Weg nach vorne für Europas Sozialdemokraten. Ein Vorschlag von Gerhard Schröder und Tony Blair., no. C99-3223*C99-3224: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung; C99-3223*C99-3224.
SPD Parteivorstand
1959 “Godesberger Programm: Grundsatzprogramm der Sozialdemokratischen Partei Deutschlands.” Beschlossen vom Außerordentlichen Parteiag der Sozialdemokratischen ParteiDeutschlands in Bad Godesberg vom 13. bis 15. November 1959. https://​www​.spd​.de​/linkableblob​/1816​/data​/godesberger​_programm​.pdf.Google Scholar
1990 Der neue Weg : ökologisch, sozial, wirtschaftlich stark. Regierungsprogramm 1990–1994. Wahlprogramm 1990: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung; A90–5465.Google Scholar
1994 Das Regierungsprogramm der SPD. Reformen für Deutschland. Wahlprogramm 1994. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung; A94-02358.Google Scholar
1998a Arbeit, Innovation und Gerechtigkeit. SPD-Programm für die Bundestagswahl 1998. Wahlprogramm 1998, no. A98 – 04467.Google Scholar
1998b Grundsatzprogramm der Sozialdemokratischen Partei Deutschlands : beschlossen vom Programm-Parteitag der Sozialdemokratischen Partei Deutschlands am 20. Dezember 1989 in Berlin, geändert auf dem Parteitag in Leipzig am 17.04.1998. “Berliner Programm” (überarb. Leipziger Fassung 1998), no. A98-07828. Accessed January 31, 2013. http://​library​.fes​.de​/pdf​-files​/bibliothek​/retro​-scans​/fa98​-07828​.pdf.Google Scholar
2002 Erneuerung und Zusammenhalt. Regierungsprogramm 2002 – 2006. Wahlprogramm 2002, no. A02 – 03539.Google Scholar
ed 2003 Das Wichtige Tun. Bundesparteitag Bochum 2003. With the assistance of C. Dahremöller.Google Scholar
The Labour Party
1987 Britain Will Win with Labour. Labour Party Manifesto. Accessed 29/05/12. http://​www​.politicsresources​.net​/area​/uk​/man​/lab87​.htm.Google Scholar
1992 It’s Time to Get Britain Working Again. Labour Manifesto. Accessed May 29, 2012. http://​www​.politicsresources​.net​/area​/uk​/man​/lab92​.htm.Google Scholar
ed 1995 Report of Conference: Annual Conference 1994, Special Conference 1995. London: Labour Party.Google Scholar
1997 New Labour – Because Britain Deserves Better. Labour Manifesto. Accessed May 29, 2012. http://​www​.politicsresources​.net​/area​/uk​/man​/lab97​.htm.Google Scholar
2001 “Ambitions for Britain.” Labour manifesto. Accessed May 29, 2012. http://​www​.politicsresources​.net​/area​/uk​/e01​/man​/lab​/lab01​.htm.Google Scholar
2010 “The Labour Party Rule Book 2010.” Accessed April 12, 2013. http://​www​.leftfutures​.org​/wp​-content​/uploads​/2011​/02​/Labour​-Party​-Rule​-Book​-2010​.pdf.
Vorstand der SPD
ed 1997 Protokoll Parteitag Hannover. With the assistance of D. Schäfer, G. Ernst, C. Dahremöller and P. Hinrichs.
ed 1998a Die Kraft des Neuen: Protokoll Wahlparteitag Leipzig 17. April 1998.Google Scholar
ed 1998b Innovation und Gerechtigkeit. Deutschland erneuern. Protokoll Parteitag Bonn 25. Oktober 1998. With the assistance of D. Schäfer, C. Dahremöller and P. Hinrichs.Google Scholar
1998c Wir sind bereit: Fünf sichere Zeichen: Politisches Archiv der SPD.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Abel-Smith, Brian
1992 “The Beveridge Report: Its Origins and Outcomes.” Int Social Security Review 45 (1–2): 5–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Abromeit, Heidrun, and Michael Stoiber
2006 Demokratien im Vergleich: Einführung in die vergleichende Analyse politischer Systeme. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Adamzik, Kirsten
2001 “Die Zukunft der Text(sorten)linguistik: Textsortennetze, Textsortenfelder, Textsorten im Verbund.” In Zur Kulturspezifik Von Textsorten, edited by Ulla Fix, Stephan Habscheid, and Josef Klein, 15–32. Tübingen: Stauffenberg.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A., and Sidney Verba
1963 The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis
1971 “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays., edited by Ben Brewster, 121–173. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Aristotle
1998 Politics: Translated by C. D. C. Reeve. Indianapolis, Ind. Hackett Pub.Google Scholar
Audickas, Lukas, Noel Dempsey, and Richard Keen
3rd 2018 “Membership of UK Political Parties: Briefing Paper Number SN05125.” News release. 3rd September 2018.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L.
1956 “A Plea for Excuses: the Presidential Address.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57: 1–30. http://​www​.jstor​.org​/stable​/4544570.Google Scholar
1962 How to Do Things with Words. The William James lectures. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul
2004 “Querying Keywords: Questions of Difference, Frequency, and Sense in Keywords Analysis.” Journal of English Linguistics 32 (4): 346–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London, New York: Continuum.
Baker, Paul, and Sibonile Ellece
2011 Key Terms in Discourse Analysis. New York, N.Y. Continuum.Google Scholar
Bale, Tim
2008 European Politics: A Comparative Introduction. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://​www​.loc​.gov​/catdir​/enhancements​/fy0829​/2008016175​-t​.html.Google Scholar
Barber, Michael
1996 “Age of Achievement Is There for the Taking.” The Times Educational Supplement (TES), October 11. Accessed October 16, 2014. http://​www​.tes​.co​.uk​/article. aspx?storycode=29894.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland
1987 Image, Music, Text. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Bastow, Steve, and James Martin
2003 Third Way Discourse: European Ideologies in the Twentieth Century. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bateman, John A.
2014 Text and Image: A Critical Introduction to the Visual/verbal Divide. Abingdon, Oxon, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beganović, Davor, Renate Lachmann, Riccardo Nicolosi, Jürg Glauser, Winfried Herget, Heiner Peters, Jeroen Jansen et al.
2013 “Rede.” In Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik [A Historical Dictionary of Rhetoric]. 7 (Pos–Rh), edited by Gert Ueding, 698–791 11. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Benke, Gertraud
2003 “Applied linguistics – a science of culture?” In “Cultural Analysis Within Linguistics: Is Linguistics Part of Cultural Studies?”: Is Linguistics Part of Cultural Studies? edited by Antje, Hornscheidt .Special issue, Linguistik Online 14. (2): 39–56. https://​bop​.unibe​.ch​/linguistik​-online​/article​/view​/822​/1420.Google Scholar
Bennett, Tony, Lawrence Grossberg, Meaghan Morris, and Raymond Williams
2005 New Keywords: A Revised Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance.
1980 “Myth, Ritual, and Political Control.” J Communication 30 (4): 166–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Peter Ludwig, and Thomas Luckmann
1991 The Social Construction of Reality. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften
2014 “Das Digitale Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache: DWDS.” http://​www​.dwds​.de/.
Bevir, Mark
2000 “New Labour: a Study in Ideology.” Br J Politics & Int Relations 2 (3): 277–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bleses, Peter, and Edgar Rose
1998 Deutungswandel der Sozialpolitik: Die Arbeitsmarkt- und Familienpolitik im parlamentarischen Diskurs. Schriften des Zentrums für Sozialpolitik 8. Frankfurt/Main, New York: Campus.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan
2005 Discourse: A critical introduction. Key topics in sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blumler, Jay G., and Michael Gurevitch
1995 The Crisis of Public Communication Communication and society. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bobbio, Norberto
1996 Left and Right: The Significance of a Political Distinction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://​www​.loc​.gov​/catdir​/description​/uchi052​/96026392​.html.Google Scholar
Bock, Bettina M.
2013 “(Echter) Lagerwahlkampf? Quantitative und qualitative Aspekte der Wahlkampfsprache der Linken.” Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur (3): 219–233.Google Scholar
Böke, Karin, Matthias Jung, Thomas Niehr, and Martin Wengeler
2000 “Vergleichende Diskurslinguistik: Überlegungen zur Analyse internationaler und intralingualer Textkorpora.” In Einwanderungsdiskurse: Vergleichende diskurslinguistische Studien : [Symposium mit dem Thema “Einwanderungsdiskurse im Internationalen Vergleich” in Hilden vom 18.–20.2.1998], edited by Thomas Niehr and Karin Böke, 11–36. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Borchert, Jens
1996 “Alte Träume und neue Realitäten: Das Ende der Sozialdemokratie.” In Das sozialdemokratische Modell: Organisationsstrukturen und Politikinhalte im Wandel, edited by Jens Borchert, Lutz Golsch, Uwe Jun, and Peter Lösche, 39–80. Reihe Europa- und Nordamerika-Studien 2. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
Borchert, Jens, Lutz Golsch, Uwe Jun, and Peter Lösche
eds 1996a Das sozialdemokratische Modell: Organisationsstrukturen und Politikinhalte im Wandel. Reihe Europa- und Nordamerika-Studien 2. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996b “Einleitung: Das sozialdemokratische Modell – Krisen und Perspektiven.” In Das sozialdemokratische Modell: Organisationsstrukturen und Politikinhalte im Wandel, edited by Jens Borchert, Lutz Golsch, Uwe Jun, and Peter Lösche, 7–21. Reihe Europa- und Nordamerika-Studien 2. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
Bordignon, Fabio
2017 “In and out: Emmanuel Macron’s anti-populist populism.” http://​blogs​.lse​.ac​.uk​/europpblog​/2017​/04​/28​/macron​-anti​-populist​-populism/.
Bourdieu, Pierre
1990 The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
1993 Sociology in Question. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Braun, Peter
1993 Tendenzen in der deutschen Gegenwartssprache: Sprachvarietäten. 3rd ed. Kohlhammer Urban-Taschenbücher Bd. 297. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers, and Frederick Cooper
2000 “Beyond “Identity”.” Theor Soc 29 (1): 1–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bubenhofer, Noah
2013 “Quantitativ informierte qualitative Diskursanalyse: Korpuslinguistische Zugänge zu Einzeltexten und Serien.” In Angewandte Diskurslinguistik: Felder, Probleme, Perspektiven, edited by Kersten S. Roth and Carmen Spiegel, 109–134. Diskursmuster 2. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Buckler, Steve, and David P. Dolowitz
2009 “Ideology, Party Identity and Renewal.” Journal of Political Ideologies 14 (1): 11–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burkhardt, Armin
1996 “Politolinguistik: Versuch einer Ortsbestimmung.” In Sprachstrategien und Dialogblockaden: Linguistische und politikwissenschaftliche Studien zur politischen Kommunikation, edited by Josef Klein and Hans-Joachim Diekmannshenke, 75–100. Sprache, Politik, Öffentlichkeit 7. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Burnard, Lou
2009 “What Is the BNC?” Accessed January 20, 2015. http://​www​.natcorp​.ox​.ac​.uk​/corpus​/index​.xml.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean
1996 “Woher kommt und wohin treibt die Sozialdemokratie?” In Das sozialdemokratische Modell: Organisationsstrukturen und Politikinhalte im Wandel, edited by Jens Borchert, Lutz Golsch, Uwe Jun, and Peter Lösche, 23–38. Reihe Europa- und Nordamerika-Studien 2. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
Busse, Dietrich
1987 Historische Semantik: Analyse eines Programms. Sprache und Geschichte Bd. 13. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
1989 “ ‘Chaoten und Gewalttäter‘: Ein Beitrag zur Semantik des politischen Sprachgebrauchs.” In Sprache zwischen Militär und Frieden: Aufrüstung der Begriffe? edited by Armin Burkhardt, Franz Hebel, and Rudolf Hoberg, 93–121. Forum für Fachsprachen-Forschung 7. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
1993 “Semantic Strategies as a Means of Politics: Linguistic Approaches to the Analysis of ‚Semantic Struggles‘.” In Tracing the Semiotic Boundaries of Politics: Workshop on Semiotics : Colloquium on Language and Politics : Revised Papers, edited by Pertti E. Ahonen, 121–128. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Busse, Dietrich, and Wolfgang Teubert
1994 “Ist Diskurs ein sprachwissenschaftliches Objekt? Zur Methodenfrage der Historischen Semantik.” In Begriffsgeschichte und Diskursgeschichte: Methodenfragen und Forschungsergebnisse der historischen Semantik, edited by Wolfgang Teubert, Dietrich Busse, and Fritz Hermanns, 10–28. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson
2008 Presidents Creating the Presidency: Deeds Done in Words. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr, and Urszula Okulska
eds 2013 Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice. Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture 50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://​site​.ebrary​.com​/lib​/alltitles​/docDetail​.action​?docID​=10729555.Google Scholar
Caramani, Daniele
2011 Comparative Politics. 2nd ed. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carrington, Ben
1998 “ ‘Football’s Coming Home’ but Whose Home? and Do We Want It? Nation, Football and the Politics of Exclusion.” In Fanatics! Power, Identity, and Fandom in Football, edited by Adam Brown, 101–123. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carroll, Lewis, John Tenniel, and Martin Gardner
2001 The Annotated Alice: The Definitive Edition. London, New York: Penguin Books.
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew
2002 An Introduction to English Morphology: Words and Their Structure. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Cedroni, Lorella
2013 “Politolinguistics: Towards a New Analysis of Political Discourse.” In Multimodal Communication in Political Speech: Shaping Minds and Social Action : International Workshop, Political Speech 2010, Rome, Italy, November 10–12, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, edited by Isabella Poggi, Francesca D’Errico, Laura Vincze, and Alessandro Vinciarelli, 220–232 7688. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Chalozin-Dovrat, Lin
2013 “ ‘Crisis‘ in Modernity: A Sign of the Times Between Decisive Change and Potential Irreversibility.” In Discourse and Crisis: Critical Perspectives, edited by Antoon de Rycker and Zuraidah M. Don, 67–97. Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture 52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2004 Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2006 Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2014 Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. 1st ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul
2004 Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul, and Christina Schäffner
1997 “Discourse and Politics.” In Interaction Discourse as Social, edited by Teun A. van Dijk, 206–230. Discourse studies 2. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2002a “Introduction: Themes and Principles in the Analysis of Political Discourse.” In Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, edited by Paul Chilton and Christina Schäffner, 1–41. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
eds 2002b Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cole, Michael
1999 “Adversary Politics and Proportional Representation.” Political Quarterly 70 (2): 166–174. Crossref.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins
2005 Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crines, Andrew S.
2015 “Reforming Labour: The Leadership of Jeremy Corbyn.” Political Insight 6 (3): 4–7. Crossref.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin
2018 “UK Labour: Credibly Redefining Left Of Centre.” In Social Democracy: A SWOT Analysis, edited by Social Europe and Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, 64–74.Google Scholar
Cuperus, René
2017 “Social democracy and the populist challenge.” In Why the left loses: The decline of the centre-left in comparative perspective, edited by Rob Manwaring and Paul Kennedy. 1st, 185–202. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, Ralf
1988 The Modern Social Conflict: An Essay on the Politics of Liberty: University of California Press. http://​books​.google​.de​/books​?id​=x7gqEoMLY2EC.Google Scholar
Dale, Iain
ed 2000 Conservative Party general election manifestos, 1900–1997. London, New York: Routledge; Politico‘s Pub.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl
1987 “Achievements and challenges in 2000 years of comparative research.” In Comparative policy research: Learning from experience. 5–12, edited by Meinolf Dierkes, Hans N. Weiler, and Ariane B. Antal. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
Di Francesco-Mayot, Sophie
2017 “The French Parti socialiste (2010–16): From office to crisis.” In Why the left loses: The decline of the centre-left in comparative perspective, edited by Rob Manwaring and Paul Kennedy. 1st, 151–166. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Dieckmann, Walther
1975 Sprache in der Politik: Einführung in die Pragmatik und Semantik der politischen Sprache. 2nd ed. Sprachwissenschaftliche Studienbücher : Abt. 2. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Dittmer, Lowell
1977 “Political Culture and Political Symbolism: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis.” World Politics 29 (4): 552–583. http://​www​.jstor​.org​/stable​/2010039.Google Scholar
Dorgeloh, Heidrun, and Anja Wanner
2010a “Introduction.” In Syntactic Variation and Genre, edited by Heidrun Dorgeloh and Anja Wanner, 1–26. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
eds 2010b Syntactic Variation and Genre. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dörner, Andreas, and Karl Rohe
1991 “Politische Sprache und politische Kultur: Diachron-kulturvergleichende Sprachanalysen am Beispiel von Großbritannien und Deutschland.” In Sprache statt Politik? Politikwissenschaftliche Semantik- und Rhetorikforschung, edited by Manfred Opp de Hipt and Erich Latniak, 35–65. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Dovring, Karin
1959 Roads of Propaganda: The Semantics of Biased Communication. With the assistance of introd. by Harold D. Lasswell. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Driver, Stephen, and Luke Martell
1998 New Labour: Politics After Thatcherism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
2000 “Left, Right and the Third Way.” Policy & Politics 28 (2): 147–161. Crossref.Google Scholar
2002 “Third Ways in Britain and Europe.” In The Third Way Transformation of Social Democracy: Normative Claims and Policy Initiatives in the 21st Century, edited by Oliver Schmidtke, 75–101. Aldershot, Hampshire, England, Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Du Bois, Inke
2009 “Wir Bleiben Kanzlerin – We Are Pregnant? On Grammatical, Semantic and Pragmatic Usages of the “We” Pronoun.” Saarland Working Papers in Linguistics (SWPL) 3: 21–34. http://​scidok​.sulb​.uni​-saarland​.de​/volltexte​/2010​/3396​/pdf​/Du​_Bois​_21​_34​.pdf. Accessed September 22, 2014.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile
1915/1995 The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dyson, Kenneth H. F.
1980 The State Tradition in Western Europe: A Study of an Idea and Institution. Oxford: Robertson.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Riccarda, and Frank Nullmeier
1997 “Knowledge, Rhetoric and Political Action in Context.” In The Political Context of Collective Action: Power, Argumentation and Democracy, edited by Riccarda Edmondson, 185. European political science series. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Elkins, David J., and Richard E. B. Simeon
1979 “A Cause in Search of Its Effect, or What Does Political Culture Explain?” Comparative Politics 11 (2): 127–145.Google Scholar
Fagan, Sarah M. B.
2009 German: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1989 Language and Power. Language in social life series. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
1995 Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Language in social life series. London, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
2000 New Labour, New Language? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2003 Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2009 “A Dialectical-Relational Approach to Critical Discourse Analysis in Social Research.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer. 2nd ed., 162–186. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington, D.C. Sage.Google Scholar
Faucher-King, Florence
2005 Changing Parties: An Anthropology of British Political Party Conferences. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fawcett, Paul, and R. A. W. Rhodes
2007 “Central Government.” In Blair‘s Britain, 1997–2007, edited by Anthony Seldon, 79–103. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Felder, Ekkehard
ed 2006 Semantische Kämpfe: Macht und Sprache in den Wissenschaften. Linguistik, Impulse & Tendenzen 19. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2014 ““Judge Us on What We Do”: The Strategic Use of Collective We in British Political Discourse.” In Constructing Collectivity: ‘we’ Across Languages and Contexts, edited by Theodossia Pavlidou, 331–350. Pragmatics & beyond new series 239. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, and Peter Bull
2012 “Doing Leadership in Political Speech: Semantic Processes and Pragmatic Inferences.” Discourse & Society 23 (2): 127–144. Crossref.Google Scholar
Fielding, Steven
2000 “New Labour and the Past.” In Labour‘s First Century, edited by Duncan Tanner, Pat Thane, and Nick Tiratsoo, 367–392. Cambridge, UK, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2003 The Labour Party: Continuity and Change in the Making of ‚New‘ Labour. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1977 “Scenes-and-Frames Semantics.” In Linguistic Structures Processing, edited by Antonio Zampolli, 55–81. Fundamental Studies in Computer Science 5. Amsterdam, New York, Oxford: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Finer, Samuel E.
1975 Adversary Politics and Electoral Reform. London: Anthony Wigram.Google Scholar
Finlayson, Alan
1999 “Third Way Theory.” Political Quarterly 70 (3): 271–279. Crossref.Google Scholar
2002 “Elements of the Blairite Image of Leadership.” Parliamentary Affairs 55 (3): 586–599. Crossref.Google Scholar
2003 Making Sense of New Labour. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Finlayson, Alan, and James Martin
2008.“ ‘It Ain’t What You Say…’: British Political Studies and the Analysis of Speech and Rhetoric.” Brit Pol 3 (4): 445–464. Crossref.Google Scholar
Flood, Christopher
2002 Political Myth: A Theoretical Introduction. Theorists of myth. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel
1977 Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
2002 Archaeology of knowledge. Routledge classics. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger
1986 Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael
1998 Ideologies and Political Theory: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1999 “The Ideology of New Labour.” Political Quarterly 70 (1): 42–51. Crossref.Google Scholar
Gaffney, John
1990 The Language of Political Leadership in Contemporary Britain. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gaffney, John, and Amerjit Lahel
2013 “The Morphology of the Labour Party‘s One Nation Narrative: Story, Plot and Authorship.” Political Quarterly 84 (3): 330–341. Crossref.Google Scholar
Gallie, Walter Bryce
1955 “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56:167–198. Crossref.Google Scholar
Gee, James Paul
2005 An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. 2nd ed. New York, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford
1973 “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture.” In Interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. 1st ed., 3–30. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geideck, Susan, and Wolf-Andreas Liebert
eds 2003 Sinnformeln: Linguistische Und Soziologische Analysen Von Leitbildern, Metaphern Und Anderen Kollektiven Orientierungsmustern. Linguistik, Impulse & Tendenzen 2. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Girnth, Heiko
1996 “Texte im politischen Diskurs: Ein Vorschlag zur diskursorientierten Beschreibung von Textsorten.” Muttersprache (1): 66–80.Google Scholar
2002 Sprache und Sprachverwendung in der Politik: Eine Einführung in die linguistische Analyse öffentlich-politischer Kommunikation. Germanistische Arbeitshefte 39. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
2013 “Das Wir hat entschieden: die Wahlkampfsprache der SPD im Bundestagswahlkampf 2013.” Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur (3): 208–218.Google Scholar
Goatly, Andrew
2007 Washing the Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture v. 23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodenough, Ward H.
1964 “Cultural Anthropology and Linguistics.” In Language in Culture and Society: A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology, edited by Dell Hymes, 36–39. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Gough, Ian
1979 The Political Economy of the Welfare State. Critical texts in social work and the welfare state. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay
2011 Questioning the Millennium: A Rationalist‘s Guide to a Precisely Arbitrary Countdown. Rev. ed., 1st Harvard University Press ed. Cambridge, Mass. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, and Stefaan Walgrave
eds 2014 Agenda setting, Policies, and Political systems: A Comparative Approach. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, Helmut
2013 “Genres in Political Discourse: The Case of the ‚inaugural Speech‘ of Austrian Chancellors.” In Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice, edited by Piotr Cap and Urszula Okulska, 29–71. Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture 50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne, and Angelika Linke
2006 “Linguistik und Kulturanalyse: Ansichten eines symbiotischen Verhältnisses.” Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 34 (1-2): 1–27. Crossref.Google Scholar
Gür-Şeker, Derya
2012 Transnationale Diskurslinguistik: Theorie und Methodik am Beispiel des sicherheitspolitischen Diskurses über die EU-Verfassung in Deutschland, Grossbritannien und der Türkei. Sprache, Politik, Gesellschaft Band 6. Bremen: Hempen Verlag.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A.
2002 “The Comparative Political Economy of the ‚Third Way.” In The Third Way Transformation of Social Democracy: Normative Claims and Policy Initiatives in the 21st Century, edited by Oliver Schmidtke, 31–58. Aldershot, Hampshire, England, Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and David W. Soskice
2001a “An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism.” In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, edited by Peter A. Hall and David W. Soskice, 1–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
eds 2001b Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1985 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: E. Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan
1985 Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Language education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hantrais, Linda
2009 International comparative research: Theory, methods and practice / Linda Hantrais. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S.
1952 “Discourse Analysis.” Language 28 (1): 1. Crossref.Google Scholar
Hartmann, R. R. K.
1980 Contrastive textology: Comparative discourse analysis in applied linguistics. Studies in descriptive linguistics v. 5. Heidelberg: Groos.Google Scholar
Harvey, David
1989 The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hay, Colin
1999a “Crisis and the Structural Transformation of the State: Interrogating the Process of Change.” Br J Politics & Int Relations 1 (3): 317–344. Crossref.Google Scholar
1999b The Political Economy of New Labour: Labouring Under False Pretences? Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
2007 Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity. Google Scholar
Heffernan, Richard, and Paul Webb
2005 “The British Prime Minister: Much More Than ‘First Among Equals’.” In The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, edited by Thomas Poguntke and Paul Webb, 26–62. Comparative politics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegelich, Simon, David Knollmann, and Johanna Kuhlmann
2011 Agenda 2010: Strategien – Entscheidungen – Konsequenzen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Wolfgang, and Dieter Viehweger
1991 Textlinguistik: Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
1984 Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Social and political theory. Cambridge, New York: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hermanns, Fritz
2012 “Sprachgeschichte als Mentalitätsgeschichte: Überlegungen zu Sinn und Form und Gegenstand historischer Semantic.” In Der Sitz der Sprache im Leben: Beiträge zu einer kulturanalytischen Linguistik, edited by Heidrun Kämper, Angelika Linke, and Martin Wengeler, 5–36. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heywood, Andrew
2007 Political Ideologies: An Introduction. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hodge, Robert, and Gunther R. Kress
1988 Social Semiotics. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Holborow, Marnie
2012 “What Is Neoliberalism? Discourse, Ideology and the Real World.” In Neoliberalism and Applied Linguistics, edited by David Block, John Gray, and Marnie Holborow, 14–32. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hosking, Geoffrey A., and George Schöpflin
eds 1997 Myths and Nationhood. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huntington, Nicholas, and Tim Bale
2002 “New Labour: New Christian Democracy?” Political Quarterly 73 (1): 44–50. Crossref.Google Scholar
Institut für Deutsche Sprache
2015 “Das Deutsche Referenzkorpus – DeReKo.” http://​www1​.ids​-mannheim​.de​/kl​/projekte​/korpora/.
Jackson, Howard, and Etienne Zé Amvela
2007 Words, Meaning and Vocabulary: An Introduction to Modern English Lexicology. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Jäger, Siegfried
2009 Kritische Diskursanalyse: Eine Einführung. 5th ed. Münster: UNRAST-Verlag.Google Scholar
Jäger, Siegfried, and Florentine Maier
2009 “Theoretical and Methodological Aspects of Foucauldian Critical Discourse Analysis and Dispositive Analysis.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer. 2nd ed., 34–61. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington, D.C. Sage.Google Scholar
Jakubíček, Miloš, Adam Kilgarriff
, Vojtěch Kovář, Pavel Rychlý, and Vít Suchomel 2013 “The TenTen Corpus Family.” Accessed February 10, 2015. http://​trac​.sketchengine​.co​.uk​/raw​-attachment​/wiki​/AK​/Papers​/tentens​_14may2013​.docx.Google Scholar
Jeffries, Lesley, and Brian Walker
2012 “Keywords in the Press: a Critical Corpus-Assisted Analysis of Ideology in the Blair Years (1998–2007).” ETC 5 (2): 208–229. Crossref.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H.
1997 “Persuasion by inference: Analysis of a party political broadcast.” In “Political Linguistics.” edited by Jan Blommaert and Chris Bulcaen. Special issue, 11: 121–137.Google Scholar
Jun, Uwe
2004 Der Wandel von Parteien in der Mediendemokratie: SPD und Labour Party im Vergleich. Frankfurt/Main, New York: Campus.Google Scholar
2017 “Germany: little hope in times of crisis.” In Why the left loses: The decline of the centre-left in comparative perspective, edited by Rob Manwaring and Paul Kennedy. 1st, 103–122. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Kaack, Heino
1971 Geschichte und Struktur des deutschen Parteiensystems. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Kammerer, Patrick
1995 “Die veränderten Konstitutionsbedingungen politischer Rhetorik: Zur Rolle der Redenschreiber, der Medien und zum vermeintlichen Ende öffentlicher Rede.” Rhetorik : ein internationales Jahrbuch 14: 14–29.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard S., and Peter Mair
1995 “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party.” Party Politics 1 (1): 5–28. Crossref.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Franz-Xaver
2003 Varianten des Wohlfahrtsstaats: Der deutsche Sozialstaat im internationalen Vergleich. Edition Suhrkamp 2301. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, Dennis, David Richards, Martin Smith, and Andrew Geddes
2006 British Politics. 5th ed. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kemmerling, Achim, and Oliver Bruttel
2006 “ ‘New Politics’ in German Labour Market Policy? The Implications of the Recent Hartz Reforms for the German Welfare State.” West European Politics 29 (1): 90–112. Crossref.Google Scholar
Kertzer, David I.
1988 Ritual, Politics, and Power. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam
2005 “Language Is Never, Ever, Ever, Random.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1 (2). Crossref.Google Scholar
2009 “Simple maths for keywords.” In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference, edited by Michaela Mahlberg, Victorina González-Díaz, and Catherine Smith. http://​ucrel​.lancs​.ac​.uk​/publications​/CL2009​/171​_FullPaper​.doc.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Vít Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý, and Vít Suchomel
2014 “The Sketch Engine: Ten Years on.” Lexicography ASIALEX 1 (1): 7–36. Crossref.Google Scholar
Kilian, Jörg
2006 “Demokratie, Recht, Solidarität – von links: Zur Wahlkampfsprache der LINKSPARTEI.PDS im Bundestagswahlkampf and 2005.” Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur (1): 60–78.Google Scholar
King, Desmond, and Mark Wickham-Jones
1999 “From Clinton to Blair: The Democratic (Party) Origins of Welfare to Work.” Political Quarterly 70 (1): 62–74. Crossref.Google Scholar
Kirchheimer, Otto
1966 “The Transformation of the Western European Party System.” In Political Parties and Political Development, edited by Joseph La Palombara and Myron Weiner, 177–200. Studies in political development 6. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Josef
1989 “Wortschatz, Wortkampf, Wortfelder in der Politik.” In Politische Semantik: Bedeutungsanalytische und sprachkritische Beiträge zur politischen Sprachverwendung, edited by Josef Klein, 3–50. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
1991 “Kann man “Begriffe besetzen”? Zur linguistischen Differenzierung einer plakativen politischen Metapher.” In Begriffe besetzen: Strategien des Sprachgebrauchs in der Politik, edited by Frank Liedtke, Martin Wengeler, and Karin Böke, 44–69. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
1996 “Insider-Lesarten: Einige Regeln zur latenten Fachkommunikation in Parteiprogrammen.” In Sprachstrategien und Dialogblockaden: Linguistische und politikwissenschaftliche Studien zur politischen Kommunikation, edited by Josef Klein and Hans-Joachim Diekmannshenke, 201–209. Sprache, Politik, Öffentlichkeit 7. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1998 “Politische Kommunikation als Sprachstrategie.” In Politische Kommunikation in der demokratischen Gesellschaft. Ein Handbuch mit Lexikonteil, edited by Otfried Jarren, 376–395: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
1999a ““Frame” als semantischer Theoriebegriff und als wissensdiagnostisches Instrumentarium.” In Interdisziplinarität und Methodenpluralismus in der Semantikforschung: Beiträge der Konferenz “Interdisziplinarität und Methodenpluralismus in der Semantikforschung” an der Universität Koblenz-Landau/Abteilung Landau 1998, edited by Inge Pohl, 157–183. Sprache-System und Tätigkeit 29. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
1999b “Sprachstrategien im Bundestagswahlkampf 1998.” Sprachreport 3: 20–27.Google Scholar
2000a “Komplexe topische Muster: Vom Einzeltopos zur diskurstyp-spezifischen Topos-Konfiguration.” In Topik und Rhetorik: Ein interdisziplinäres Symposium, edited by Thomas Schirren and Gert Ueding, 623–649. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
2000b “Textsorten im Bereich politischer Institutionen.” In Text-Und Gesprächslinguistik: Ein Internationales Handbuch Zeitgenössischer Forschung / Linguistics of Text and Conversation : an International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Vol. 1, edited by Klaus Brinker, Gerd Antos, Wolfgang Heinemann, and Sven F. Sager. 2 vols, 732–755. Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikations-wissenschaft = Handbooks of linguistics and communication science 16. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2002a “Topik und Frametheorie als argumentations- und begriffsgeschichtliche Instrumente, dargestellt am Kolonialdiskurs.” In Neue deutsche Sprachgeschichte: Mentalitäts-, kultur- und sozialgeschichtliche Zusammenhänge, edited by Dieter Cherubim, Karlheinz Jakob, and Angelika Linke, 167–181. Studia Linguistica Germanica 64. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2002b “Weg und Bewegung: Metaphorische Konzepte im politischen Sprachgebrauch und ein frame-theoretischer Repräsentationsvorschlag.” In Politische Konzepte und verbale Strategien: Brisante Wörter – Begriffsfelder – Sprachbilder, edited by Oswald Panagl and Horst Stürmer, 221–235. Frankfurt am Main, New York: Lang.Google Scholar
2007a “Hartz IV, Agenda 2010 und der “Job-Floater”: die Bedeutung der Sprache in Veränderungsprozessen.” In Reformen kommunizieren: Herausforderungen an die Politik, edited by Werner Weidenfeld, 159–205. Gütersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann-Stiftung.Google Scholar
2007b “Linguistische Hermeneutik politischer Rede. Eine Modellanalyse am Beispiel von Kanzler Schröders Verkündung der Agenda 2010.” In Linguistische Hermeneutik: Theorie und Praxis des Verstehens und Interpretierens, edited by Fritz Hermanns and Werner Holly, 201–238. Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 272. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Klein, Josef, and Hans-Joachim Diekmannshenke
eds 1996 Sprachstrategien und Dialogblockaden: Linguistische und politikwissenschaftliche Studien zur politischen Kommunikation. Sprache, Politik, Öffentlichkeit 7. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
1980 “Argumentation und Argument.” Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 38 (3): 9–57.Google Scholar
Konerding, Klaus-Peter
2009 “Diskurslinguistik – eine neue linguistische Teildisziplin.” In Sprache. Vol. 53, edited by Ekkehard Felder, 155–177. Heidelberger Jahrbücher. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Crossref.Google Scholar
König, Jens
2002 “Das System Medienkanzler.” Die Tageszeitung (taz), September 6. Accessed November 10, 2014. http://​www​.taz​.de​/1​/archiv​/?dig​=2002​/09​/06​/a0172.Google Scholar
König, Thomas, George Tsebelis, and Marc Debus
eds 2010 Reform Processes and Policy Change: Veto Players and Decision-Making in Modern Democracies. Studies in public choice. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Kopperschmidt, Josef
1989 Methodik der Argumentationsanalyse. Problemata 119. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart
1988 Critique and Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Kranert, Michael
2017 “ ‘Today I offer you, and we offer the country a new vision’: The strategic use of first person pronouns in party conference speeches of the Third Way.” Discourse & Society 28 (2): 182–203. Crossref.Google Scholar
2018 “Political myth as a legitimation strategy: The case of the golden age myth in the discourses of the Third Way.” Journal of Language and Politics 17 (6): 882–906. Crossref.Google Scholar
Kranert, Michael, and Geraldine Horan
2018 “Doing Politics: Recent developments in political discourse analysis.” In Doing Politics. Discursivity, performativity and mediation in political discourse, edited by Michael Kranert and Geraldine Horan, 1–23. Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture (DAPSAC) 80. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther R., and Theo van Leeuwen
2006 Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Edgar Grande, Martin Dolezal, Marc Helbing, Dominic Höglinger, Swen Hutter, and Bruno Wüest
2012 Political conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krouwel, André
2006 “Party Models.” In Handbook of Party Politics, edited by Richard S. Katz and William Crotty, 249–269. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kuck, Kristin, and David Römer
2012 “Metaphern und Argumentationsmuster im Mediendiskurs zur ‘Finanzkrise’.” In Krise, Cash & Kommunikation: Die Finanzkrise in den Medien, edited by Anja Peltzer, Kathrin Lämmle, and Andreas Wagenknecht, 71–93. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
Kühn, Peter
1992 “Adressaten und Adressatenkarussell in der öffentlich politischen Auseinandersetzung.” Rhetorik : ein internationales Jahrbuch 11: 51–66.Google Scholar
1995 Mehrfachadressierung: Untersuchungen zur adressatenspezifischen Polyvalenz sprachlichen Handelns. Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 154. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Kuße, Holger
2012 Kulturwissenschaftliche Linguistik: Eine Einführung. UTB 3745. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
2002 Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2014 The all new Don‘t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. Revised and updated edition. White River Junction, Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980 Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Landman, Todd
2008 Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics: An Introduction. 3rd ed. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leckie-Tarry, Helen
1995 Language and Context: A Functional Linguistic Theory of Register. With the assistance of D. Birch. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Lehman, Edward W.
1972 “On the Concept of Political Culture: A Theoretical Reassessment.” Social Forces 50 (3): 361–370. Crossref.Google Scholar
Lepsius, M. Rainer
2009 “Die Prägung der politischen Kultur der Bundesrepublik durch institutionelle Ordnungen.” In Interessen, Ideen und Institutionen. 2nd ed., 63–84. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Lessenich, Stephan
2003 “Umwertung der Werte.” Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik (9): 1051–1054.Google Scholar
Leuschner, Torsten, and Sylvia Jaworska
2018 “Anglo-German Discourse Crossings and Contrasts: Introduction to the special issue.” PS 9 (1): 2–7. Crossref.Google Scholar
Levitas, Ruth
1998 The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan.Google Scholar
L‘Hôte, Emilie
2014 Identity, narrative and metaphor: A corpus-based cognitive analysis of new labour discourse. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend
1971 “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” Am Polit Sci Rev 65 (03): 682–693. Crossref.Google Scholar
1999 Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, Conn., London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven
2003 “Epilogue: The Grand Dichotomy of the Twentieth Century.” In The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought, edited by Terence Ball and Richard Bellamy, 602–626. The Cambridge history of political thought. London, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macintyre, Donald
2000 Mandelson: And the Making of New Labour. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Manwaring, Rob, and Matt Beech
2017 “The case of the British Labour Party: back to the wilderness.” In Why the left loses: The decline of the centre-left in comparative perspective, edited by Rob Manwaring and Paul Kennedy. 1st, 25–38. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Manwaring, Rob, and Paul Kennedy
eds 2017a Why the left loses: The decline of the centre-left in comparative perspective. 1st. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
2017b “Why the left loses: understanding the comparative decline of the centre-left.” In Why the left loses: The decline of the centre-left in comparative perspective, edited by Rob Manwaring and Paul Kennedy. 1st, 5–21. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R.
1999 “Modelling Context: the Crooked Path of Progress in Contextual Linguistics.” In Text and Context in Functional Linguistics, edited by Mohsen Ghadessy, 25–61. Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science v.169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., and David Rose
2003 Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. 2nd ed. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2008 Genre Relations: Mapping culture. London, Oakville, CT: Equinox Pub.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., and Peter R. R. White
2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels
1959 “Die deutsche Ideologie.” In Werke, 9–530. Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
May, Tim
2011 Social research: Issues, methods and process. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony, Richard Xiao, and Yukio Tono
2006 Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. Routledge applied linguistics 2006: 1. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meng, Richard
2002 Der Medienkanzler: Was bleibt vom System Schröder? 1. Aufl., Originalausg. Edition Suhrkamp 2265. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Merkel, Wolfgang
1996 “Vergangenheit, Gegenwart und Zukunft der Sozialdemokratie.” In Das sozialdemokratische Modell: Organisationsstrukturen und Politikinhalte im Wandel, edited by Jens Borchert, Lutz Golsch, Uwe Jun, and Peter Lösche, 81–106. Reihe Europa- und Nordamerika-Studien 2. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
Merkel, Wolfgang, Alexander Petring, Christian Henkes, and Christoph Egle
2008 Social democracy in power: The capacity to reform. Routledge research in comparative politics 26. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Minsky, Marvin
1975 “A Framework for Representing Knowledge.” In The Psychology of Computer Vision, edited by Patrick H. Winston and Berthold Horn, 211–277. McGraw-Hill computer science series. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mio, Jeffrey Scott
1996 “Metaphor, Politics and Persuasion.” In Metaphor: Implications and Applications, edited by Jeffrey S. Mio and Albert N. Katz, 127–146. Mahwah, N.J: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mohr, Reinhard
2002 “War da was? Wenige Monate vor der Bundestagswahl stellen nicht nur Intellektuelle die Frage: Vier Jahre Rot-Grün – ja und?” Der Spiegel (22): 190–194. http://​wissen​.spiegel​.de​/wissen​/image​/show​.html​?did​=22702556​&aref​=image030​/E0221​/SCSP200202201900195​.pdf​&thumb​=false. Accessed April 30, 2013.Google Scholar
Mughan, Anthony
2000 Media and the Presidentialization of Parliamentary Elections. Basing-stoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter, and Rom Harré
1990 Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Language in society. Oxford, UK, Cambridge, Mass., USA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Müller, Marion G.
2000 “Parteitagsinszenierungen diesseits und jenseits des Atlantiks.” In Trans-Atlantik–Trans-Portabel? Die Amerikanisierungsthese in der politischen Kommunikation, edited by Klaus Kamps, 221–246. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
2002 “Parteitagskommunikation: Funktionen, Strukturen, Trends in Deutschland und den USA.” In Politische Akteure in der Mediendemokratie: Politiker in den Fesseln der Medien? edited by Heribert Schatz, Patrick Rössler, and Jörg-Uwe Nieland. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Muntigl, Peter
2002 “Politicization and Depoliticization: Employment Policy in the European Union.” In Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, edited by Paul Chilton and Christina Schäffner, 45–79. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas
2003 “Metaphor Scenarios in Political Discourse in Britain and Germany.” In Sinnformeln: Linguistische Und Soziologische Analysen Von Leitbildern, Metaphern Und Anderen Kollektiven Orientierungsmustern, edited by Susan Geideck and Wolf-Andreas Liebert, 259–282. Linguistik, Impulse & Tendenzen 2. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2006 “Metaphor Scenarios in Public Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol 21: 23–38.Google Scholar
Naber, Daniel, and Michal Boleslav Měchura
2014 “Deutsches Morphologie-Lexikon: lemmatization-de.txt.” Accessed January 02, 2016. http://​www​.lexiconista​.com​/datasets​/lemmatization/.Google Scholar
Nachtwey, Oliver
2009 Marktsozialdemokratie: Die Transformation von SPD und Labour Party. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Niehr, Thomas
2002 “Kampf um Wörter? Sprachthematisierungen als strategische Argumente im politischen Meinungsstreit.” In Politische Konzepte und verbale Strategien: Brisante Wörter – Begriffsfelder – Sprachbilder, edited by Oswald Panagl and Horst Stürmer, 85–104. Frankfurt am Main, New York: Lang.Google Scholar
2006 “““Bewahren wir, was wir für die Zukunft brauchen“: Textsortenmischung und ihre Funktion am Beispiel des Wahlmanifests der SPD.” Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur (1): 25–42.Google Scholar
2013 “Politolinguistik – Diskurslinguistik: Gemeinsame Perspektiven und Anwendungsbezüge.” In Angewandte Diskurslinguistik: Felder, Probleme, Perspektiven, edited by Kersten S. Roth and Carmen Spiegel, 73–88. Diskursmuster 2. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
2014 Einführung in die Politolinguistik: Gegenstände und Methoden. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
2018 ““Profit, Privatisierung, Preisdruck”: Die Linke und ihrr Kampf gegen ökonomische Ungerechtigkeit.” Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur 14 (1): 50–60.Google Scholar
Nullmeier, Frank
1993 “Wissen und Policy-Forschung und rhetorisch-dialektisches Handlungsmodell.” In Policy-Analyse: Kritik und Neuorientierung, edited by Adrienne Windhoff-Héritier. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
OED Oxford English Dictionary online
2015a “‘believe, v.‘” Accessed January 20, 2015. http://​www​.oed​.com​/view​/Entry​/17376​?redirectedFrom​=believe#eid.
2015b “‘dogma, n.‘.” Accessed January 21, 2015. http://​www​.oed​.com​/view​/Entry​/56479​?redirectedFrom​=dogma#eid.
2015c “‘faith, N. and Int.‘.” Accessed January 21, 2015. http://​www​.oed​.com​/view​/Entry​/67760​?rskey​=Y1YR2Q​&result​=1​&isAdvanced​=false#eid.
2015d “‘protect, V.‘.” Accessed January 20, 2015. http://​www​.oed​.com​/view​/Entry​/153127​?redirectedFrom​=protect#eid.
2015e “‘renew, v.‘.” Accessed January 21, 2015. http://​www​.oed​.com​/view​/Entry​/162424​?rskey​=00pzpN​&result​=2#eid.
Offe, Claus
1972 Strukturprobleme des kapitalistischen Staates: Aufsätze zur politischen Soziologie. Edition Suhrkamp, 549. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
O‘Keeffe, Anne, Michael McCarthy, and Ronald Carter
2007 From corpus to classroom: Language use and language teaching. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Panagl, Oswald, and Horst Stürmer
eds 2002 Politische Konzepte und verbale Strategien: Brisante Wörter – Begriffsfelder – Sprachbilder. Frankfurt am Main, New York: Lang.
Partington, Alan
2008 “The armchair and the machine: corpus-assisted discourse research.” In Corpora for university language teachers, edited by Carol T. Torsello, Katherine Ackerley, and Erik Castello, 95–118. Linguistic insights : studies in language and communication v. 74. Bern, New York: Peter Lange.Google Scholar
Peele, Gillian
2004 Governing the UK: British Politics in the 21st Century. 4th ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm
1982 The Realm of Rhetoric. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Perger, Werner A.
1998 “Der SPD-Kanzlerkandidat hatte einen fulminanten Start. Nicht zuletzt dank Bodo Hombach: Zu früh gefreut ist halb verloren.” Die ZEIT 1998 13. http://​pdf​.zeit​.de​/1998​/13​/hombach​.txt​.19980319​.xml​.pdf.Google Scholar
Pielenz, Michael
1993 Argumentation und Metapher: G. Narr. http://​books​.google​.de​/books​?id​=9CMnYQWVDD8C.
Poguntke, Thomas
2005 “A Presidentializing Party State? The Federal Republic of Germany.” In The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, edited by Thomas Poguntke and Paul Webb, 63–87. Comparative politics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poguntke, Thomas, and Paul Webb
eds 2005 The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Comparative politics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
von Polenz, Peter
1985 Deutsche Satzsemantik: Grundbegriffe des Zwischen-den-Zeilen-Lesens. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Posner, Roland
1992 “Was ist Kultur? Zur semiotischen Explikation anthropologischer Grundbegriffe.” In Kultur, Evolution: Fallstudien und Synthese, edited by Marlene Landsch, Heiko Karnowski, and Ivan Bystřina, 1–65. Frankfurt am Main, New York: Lang.Google Scholar
Potthoff, Heinrich, Susanne Miller, and Martin Kane
2006 The Social Democratic Party of Germany 1848–2005. Bonn: Dietz.Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group
2007 “MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol 22 (1): 1–39.Google Scholar
Reese-Schäfer, Walter
1999 “Neuere Entwicklungen kommunitarischer Politik.” Forschungsjournal NSB 12 (2): 65–76.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin
2008a “Analysing Political Rhetoric.” In Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michał Krzyżanowski, 96–120. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2008b “Rhetoric of Political Speeches.” In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, edited by Ruth Wodak and Veronika Koller, 243–270. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2001 Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2009 “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer. 2nd ed., 87–121. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington, D.C. Sage.Google Scholar
Riedel, Manfred
1997 “Gesellschaft, Gemeinschaft.” In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, edited by Otto Brunner, Werner Conze, and Reinhart Koselleck. 1. Aufl., 801–862. Stuttgart: E. Klett.Google Scholar
Rohe, Karl
1993 “The State Tradition in Germany: Continuities and Changes.” In Political Culture in Germany, edited by Dirk Berg-Schlosser and Ralf Rytlewski, 215–231. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
1994 “Politische Kultur: Zum Verständnis eines theoretischen Konzepts.” In Politische Kultur in Ost- und Westdeutschland, edited by Oskar Niedermayer, 1–21. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Römer, David
2018 ““Nun stehe ich hier vor Euch: ein Mann aus Würselen“: Die Wahlkampfsprache der SPD“.” Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur 14 (1): 4–17.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard
1984 Do Parties Make a Difference? London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Roth, Kersten Sven, and Carmen Spiegel
eds 2013 Angewandte Diskurslinguistik: Felder, Probleme, Perspektiven. Diskursmuster 2. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. http://​www​.oldenbourg​-link​.com​/doi​/book​/10​.1524​/9783050061054.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, David
2006 The Labour Party and British Society: 1880–2005. Brighton, Portland: Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rudzio, Wolfgang
2003 Das politische System der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. 6th ed. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Rushdie, Salman
1984 Shame. London: PicadorGoogle Scholar
Sassoon, Donald
1996 One Hundred Years of Socialism: The West European Left in the Twentieth Century. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Scarrow, Susan E.
2002 “Party Decline in the Parties State? The Changing Environment of German Politics.” In Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, edited by Paul Webb, David M. Farrell, and Ian Holliday, 78–106. Comparative politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schäffner, Christina
2003 “Third Ways and New Centres: Ideological Unity or Difference?” In Apropos of Ideology: Translation Studies on Ideology, Ideologies in Translation Studies, edited by María C. Pérez, 23–41. Manchester, UK, Northampton, MA: St. Jerome Pub.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Manfred G.
2007 Das politische System Deutschlands: Institutionen, Willensbildung und Politikfelder. Lizenzausg. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung.Google Scholar
Schmidtke, Oliver
ed 2002 The Third Way Transformation of Social Democracy: Normative Claims and Policy Initiatives in the 21st Century. Aldershot, Hampshire, England, Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Schöpflin, George
1997 “The Functions of Myth and a Taxonomy of Myths.” In Myths and Nationhood, edited by Geoffrey A. Hosking and George Schöpflin, 19–35. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schröter, Melani
2008 “Discourse in a Nutshell – Key Words in Public Discourse and Lexicography.” German as a foreign language GFL 2: 43–57. http://​www​.gfl​-journal​.de​/2​-2008​/schroeter​.pdf.Google Scholar
2013 “Kontrastive Analyse politischen Diskurses: Skizze, Verkomplizierung und Ausblick.” In Politik als sprachlich gebundenes Wissen: Politische Sprache im lebenslangen Lernen und politischen Handeln, edited by Jörg Kilian and Thomas Niehr. Sprache – Politik – Gesellschaft Band 8. Bremen: Hempen Verlag.Google Scholar
Schröter, Melani, and Björn Carius
2009 Vom politischen Gebrauch der Sprache: Wort, Text, Diskurs. Frankfurt am Main, New York: Lang. Eine Einführung.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ronald, Suzanne B. K. Scollon, and Rodney H. Jones
2012 Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. 3rd ed. Language in society. Malden, Mass. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Scott, Mike
2009 “In Search of a Bad Reference Corpus.” In What‘s in a Word-List? Investigating Word Frequency and Keyword Extraction, edited by Dawn Archer, 80–91. Digital research in the arts and humanities. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
2014 WordSmith Tools. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software. Accessed February 18, 2015. http://​www​.lexically​.net​/wordsmith​/index​.html.Google Scholar
2015 “WordList display.” Accessed January 13, 2016. http://​lexically​.net​/downloads​/version6​/HTML​/index​.html​?wordlistdisplay​.htm.
Searle, John R.
1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin
2008 “Social Democratic Reforms of the Welfare State: Germany and the UK Compared.” In Modernising the Welfare State: The Blair Legacy, edited by Martin A. Powell, 235–254. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Seldon, Anthony
2005 Blair. 2nd ed. London: Free Press.Google Scholar
Semino, Elena
2008 Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, Eric
1996 “Von “Old Labour” zu “New Labour”: Die Transformation der Britischen Sozialdemokratie.” In Das sozialdemokratische Modell: Organisationsstrukturen und Politikinhalte im Wandel, edited by Jens Borchert, Lutz Golsch, Uwe Jun, and Peter Lösche, 185–212. Reihe Europa- und Nordamerika-Studien 2. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
2007 Losing Labour‘s Soul? New Labour and the Blair Government 1997–2007. London, New York: Routledge. http://​www​.loc​.gov​/catdir​/enhancements​/fy0731​/2007025391​-d​.html.Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie
2003 “Lexical Metaphor and Interpersonal Meaning.” In Grammatical Metaphor: Views from Systemic Functional Linguistics, edited by Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, Miriam Taverniers, and Louise Ravelli, 223–256. Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science v. 236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie, Miriam Taverniers, and Louise Ravelli
eds 2003 Grammatical Metaphor: Views from Systemic Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science v. 236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Simpson, Paul
1993 Language, Ideology and Point of View. The Interface series. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Slevin, James
2000 The internet and society. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Smirnova, Elena, and Tanja Mortelmans
2010 Funktionale Grammatik: Konzepte und Theorien. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D.
1997 “The ‘Golden Age’ and National Renewal.” In Myths and Nationhood, edited by Geoffrey A. Hosking and George Schöpflin, 36–59. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Someya, Yasumasa
1998 “e_lemma.txt (Ver.2 for WordSmith 4).” Accessed January 02, 2016. http://​lexically​.net​/downloads​/BNC​_wordlists​/e​_lemma​.txt.
Spillner, Bernd
1982 “Stilanalyse semiotisch komplexer Texte: Zum Verhältnis von sprachlicher und bildlicher Information in Werbeanzeigen.” Kodikas/Code. Ars Semeiotica 1 (4/5): 91–106.Google Scholar
Spitzmüller, Jürgen
2011 Diskurslinguistik: Eine Einführung in Theorien und Methoden der transtextuellen Sprachanalyse. Berlin [u.a.]: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Spitzmüller, Jürgen, and Ingo H. Warnke
2011 “Discourse as a ‘linguistic Object’: Methodical and Methodological Delimitations.” Critical Discourse Studies 8 (2): 75–94. Crossref.Google Scholar
Stewart, Dominic
2010 Semantic Prosody: A Critical Evaluation. Routledge advances in corpus linguistics 9. London: Routledge. http://​www​.tandfonline​.com/ 1850–9999.Google Scholar
Stötzel, Georg, and Thorsten Eitz
eds 2002 Zeitgeschichtliches Wörterbuch der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Hildesheim, New York: Olms.Google Scholar
Strauss, Gerhard
1986 Der politische Wortschatz: Zur Kommunikations- und Textsortenspezifik. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang
2003 “No longer the century of corporatism: Das Ende des Bündnisses für Arbeit.” MPIfG working paper, 4. http://​www​.econstor​.eu​/bitstream​/10419​/44279​/1​/64440342X​.pdf.Google Scholar
Strohmaier, Brenda
2002 “Beliebt wie Fußpilz: Der Fall des Medienkanzlers: Gerhard Schröder wird scharf attackiert.” Berliner Zeitung, November 22. Accessed November 10, 2014. http://​www​.berliner​-zeitung​.de​/archiv​/der​-fall​-des​-medienkanzlers​--gerhard​-schroeder​-wird​-scharf​-attackiert​-beliebt​-wie​-fusspilz,10810590,10046182,view,printVersion​.html.Google Scholar
Tannock, Stuart
1995 “Nostalgia critique.” Cultural Studies 9 (3): 453–464. Crossref.Google Scholar
Taverniers, Miriam
2003 “Grammatical Metaphor in SFL: A Historiography of the Introduction and Initial Study of the Concept.” In Grammatical Metaphor: Views from Systemic Functional Linguistics, edited by Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, Miriam Taverniers, and Louise Ravelli, 5–35. Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science v. 236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Thiebault, Jean-Louis
1993 “Party leadership selection in France.” Eur J Political Res 24 (3): 277–293. Crossref.Google Scholar
Thorpe, Andrew
2008 A History of the British Labour Party. 3rd ed. British studies series. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tönnies, Ferdinand
1887/1979 Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie. 8. Aufl. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen Edelston
2003 The Uses of Argument. Updated ed. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tournier, Maurice
2002 Propos d‘étymologie sociale: Tome 3, Des sources du sens. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Townson, Michael
1992 Mother Tongue and Fatherland: Language and Politics in German. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George
2002 Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. New York, Princeton, N.J: Russell Sage Foundation; Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Turowski, Jan
2010 Sozialdemokratische Reformdiskurse. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun Adrianus
1993 “Principles of critical discourse analysis.” Discourse & Society 4 (2): 249–283.Google Scholar
1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2008 Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2010 Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun Adrianus, and Walter Kintsch
1983 Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo
1996 “The Representation of Social Actors.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Carmen R. Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard, 32–70. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2005 “Three Models of Interdisciplinarity.” In A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity, edited by Ruth Wodak and Paul Chilton, 3–18. Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture v. 13. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2008 Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford studies in sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vidal-Beneyto, José
1999 “Anthony Giddens und Bodo Hombach fundieren die Neue Mitte: Die Privatisierung der Sozialdemokratie.” Le Monde diplomatique, July 9. Accessed October 18, 2013. http://​www​.monde​-diplomatique​.de​/pm​/1999​/07​/09​/a0001​.text​.name,askv6g00M​.n,57.Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija
2010 “Variation Across Texts and Discourses: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives on Text Type and Genre.” In Syntactic Variation and Genre, edited by Heidrun Dorgeloh and Anja Wanner, 53–85. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija, and Helena Halmari
2005 “Persuasion across genres: Emerging perspectives.” In Persuasion Across Genres: A Linguistic Approach, edited by Helena Halmari and Tuija Virtanen, 3–24. Pragmatics & beyond, 0922-842X new series v. 130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Walter, Franz
2009 Die SPD: Biographie einer Partei. Überarb. und erw. Taschenbuchausg. Reinbek: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Warnke, Ingo H.
2007 “Diskurslinguistik nach Foucault – Dimensionen einer Sprachwissenschaft jenseits textueller Grenzen.” In Diskurslinguistik nach Foucault, edited by Ingo H. Warnke. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Warnke, Ingo H., and Jürgen Spitzmüller
eds 2008a Methoden Der Diskurslinguistik: Sprachwissenschaftliche Zugänge Zur Transtextuellen Ebene. Linguistik, Impulse & Tendenzen, 1612–8702 31. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2008b “Methoden und Methodologie der Diskurslinguistik -: Grundlagen und Verfahren einer Sprachwissenschaft jenseits textueller Grenzen.” In Methoden Der Diskurslinguistik: Sprachwissenschaftliche Zugänge Zur Transtextuellen Ebene, edited by Ingo H. Warnke and Jürgen Spitzmüller, 3–54. Linguistik, Impulse & Tendenzen, 1612–8702 31. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent
1986 “The Politics of Blame Avoidance.” Journal of Public Policy 6 (4): 371–398. Crossref.Google Scholar
Webb, Paul
2000 The Modern British Party System. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wehler, Hans-Ulrich
1987 “Bd 2: Von der Reformära bis zur industriellen und politischen “Deutschen Doppelrevolution” 1815–1845/49.” In Deutsche Gesellschaftsgeschichte. 5 vols. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Welch, Stephen
2013 The Theory of Political Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wengeler, Martin
1995 “““Der alte Streit “hier Marktwirtschaft dort Planwirtschaft” ist vorbei”: Ein Rückblick auf die sprachlichen Aspekte wirtschaftspolitischer Diskussionen.” In Kontroverse Begriffe: Geschichte des öffentlichen Sprachgebrauchs in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, edited by Georg Stötzel and Martin Wengeler, 35–92. Sprache, Politik, Öffentlichkeit 4. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2003a “Argumentationstopos als sprachwissenschaftlicher Gegenstand: Für eine Erweiterung linguistischer Methoden bei der Analyse öffentlicher Diskurse.” In Sinnformeln: Linguistische Und Soziologische Analysen Von Leitbildern, Metaphern Und Anderen Kollektiven Orientierungsmustern, edited by Susan Geideck and Wolf-Andreas Liebert, 59–82. Linguistik, Impulse & Tendenzen 2. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2003b Topos und Diskurs: Begründung einer argumentationsanalytischen Methode und ihre Anwendung auf den Migrationsdiskurs (1960–1985). Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 244. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
2011 “Linguistische Diskursanalysen – deskriptiv, kritisch oder kritisch durch Deskription?” In Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur: Konzepte und Impulse für Wissenschaft und Öffentlichkeit, edited by Jürgen Schiewe, 35–48. Greifswalder Beiträge zur Linguistik 6.Google Scholar
Wernick, Andrew
1991 Promotional Culture: Advertising, Ideology and Symbolic Expression. London: Sage.Google Scholar
White, Jonathan
2012 “Community, Transnationalism, and the Left-Right Metaphor.” European Journal of Social Theory 15 (2): 197–219. Crossref.Google Scholar
White, Michael
1995 “Blair Wants ‘to Make UK Young Again’.” The Guardian, October 4. Accessed October 16, 2014. http://​www​.theguardian​.com​/politics​/1995​/oct​/04​/speeches​.comment​/print.Google Scholar
1996 “Blair Spells Out His ‘Age of Achievement’ for Britain.” The Guardian October 2 http://​www​.theguardian​.com​/politics​/1996​/oct​/02​/speeches​.michaelwhite​/print.Google Scholar
Widdowson, Henry G.
1995 “Discourse analysis: a critical view.” Language and Literature 4 (3): 157–172. Crossref.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond
1983 Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
von Wilpert, Gero
1989 Sachwörterbuch der Literatur. Stuttgart: Kröner.Google Scholar
Wilson, John
1990 Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1963 Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2004 “Critical discourse analysis.” In Qualitative research practice, edited by Clive Seale, 197–213. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2013 “Analysing Meetings in Political and Business Contexts: Different Genres – Similar Strategies?” In Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice, edited by Piotr Cap and Urszula Okulska, 187–221. Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture 50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart
1998 Zur diskursiven Konstruktion nationaler Identität. 1. Aufl. Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft 1349. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
2009 The Discursive Construction of National Identity. 2nd. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Translated by Angelika Hirsch, Richard Mitten, and J. W. Unger.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
2009a “Critical discourse analysis: history, agenda, theory and methodology.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer. 2nd ed., 1–33. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington, D.C. Sage.Google Scholar
eds 2009b Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington, D.C. Sage.Google Scholar
Wolfrum, Edgar
2013 Rot-Grün an der Macht: Deutschland 1998 – 2005. 1st ed. München: Beck, C H.Google Scholar
Wortham, Stanton E. F.
1996 “Mapping participant deictics: A technique for discovering speakers‘ footing.” Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 331–348. Crossref.Google Scholar
Xu, Jiajin
2009 “Log-likelihood ratio calculator.” Accessed December 04, 2017. http://​www​.bfsu​-corpus​.org​/static​/BFSUTools​/BFSULL​.xls.Google Scholar
Ziem, Alexander
2008 “Frame-Semantik und Diskursanalyse – Skizze einer kognitionswissenschaftlich inspirierten Methode zur Analyse gesellschaftlichen Wissens.” In Methoden Der Diskurslinguistik: Sprachwissenschaftliche Zugänge Zur Transtextuellen Ebene, edited by Ingo H. Warnke and Jürgen Spitzmüller, 89–116. Linguistik, Impulse & Tendenzen, 1612–8702 31. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Kallis, Aristotle
2020.  In Beyond the Fascist Century, ► pp. 73 ff. Crossref logo
Kitis, E. Dimitris & Dimitris Serafis
2020. Legitimizing austerity in crisis-hit Greece. Journal of Language and Politics 19:4 ► pp. 691 ff. Crossref logo
Kranert, Michael
2020.  In Discursive Approaches to Populism Across Disciplines, ► pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Kranert, Michael
2020.  In Discursive Approaches to Populism Across Disciplines, ► pp. 31 ff. Crossref logo
Kranert, Michael
2020. Perrez, Julien; Reuchamps, Min; Thibodeau, Paul H. (2019): Variation in political metaphor. Journal of Language and Politics Crossref logo
Krasni, Jan
2020. How to hijack a discourse? Reflections on the concepts of post-truth and fake news. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 7:1 Crossref logo
Tameryan, Tatyana Yu. & Tatyana G. Rakhmatulaeva
2020. Syncretism of the New Year’s Greetings Genre: Bilingual Ranking and Strategic Intentions. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics :4(2020) ► pp. 32 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Communication Studies

Communication Studies

Linguistics

Discourse studies
Pragmatics
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009030 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Pragmatics
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2019028029 | Marc record