The Ethics of Literary Communication
Genuineness, directness, indirectness
Editors
Viewing literature as one among other forms of communication, Roger D. Sell and his colleagues evaluate writer-respondent relationships according to the same ethical criterion as applies for dialogue of any other kind. In a nutshell: Are writers and readers respecting each other’s human autonomy? If and when the answer here is “Yes!”, Sell’s team describe the communication that is going on as ‘genuine’. In this latest book, they offer new illustrations of what they mean by this, and ask whether genuineness is compatible with communicational directness and communicational indirectness. Is there a risk, for instance, that a very direct manner of writing could be unacceptably coercive, or that a more indirect manner could be irresponsible, or positively deceitful? The book’s overall conclusion is: “Not necessarily!” A directness which is truthful and stimulates free discussion does respect the integrity of the other person. And the same is true of an indirectness which encourages readers themselves to contribute to the construction and assessment of ideas, stories and experiences – sometimes literary indirectness may allow greater scope for genuineness than does the directness of a non-literary letter. By way of illustrating these points, the book opens up new lines of inquiry into a wide range of literary texts from Britain, Germany, France, Denmark, Poland, Romania, and the United States.
[Dialogue Studies, 19] 2013. xii, 271 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Acknowledgements | p. ix
-
Contributors | pp. xi–xii
-
Chapter 1. IntroductionRoger D. Sell, Adam Borch and Inna Lindgren | pp. 1–19
-
Chapter 2. Herbert’s considerateness: A communicational assessmentRoger D. Sell | pp. 21–28
-
Chapter 3. “Not my readers but the readers of their own selves”: Literature as communication with the self in Proust’s À la recherche du temps perduAnna Orhanen | pp. 29–45
-
Chapter 4. Intersubjective positioning and community-making: E. E. Cummings’s Preface to his Collected Poems 1923–1958Mohamed Saki | pp. 47–60
-
Chapter 5. Genuine and distorted communication in autobiographical writing: E. M. Forster’s “West Hackhurst” and its contextsJason Finch | pp. 61–80
-
Chapter 6. Women and the public sphere: Pope’s addressivity through The DunciadAdam Borch | pp. 81–97
-
Chapter 7. Kipling, his narrator, and public interestInna Lindgren | pp. 99–113
-
Chapter 8. Call and response: Autonomy and dialogicity in Isaac Bashevis Singer’s The PenitentDavid Stromberg | pp. 115–128
-
Chapter 9. Hypothetical action: Poetry under erasure in Blake, Dickinson and EliotBo Pettersson | pp. 129–145
-
Chapter 10. Metacommunication as ritual: Contemporary Romanian poetryCarmen Popescu | pp. 147–166
-
Chapter 11. Terminal aposiopesis and sublime communication: Shakespeare’s Sonnet 126 and Keats’s “To Autumn”Jonathan P.A. Sell | pp. 167–188
-
Chapter 12. The utopian horizon of communication: Ernst Bloch’s Traces and Johann-Peter Hebel’s Treasure ChestJohan Siebers | pp. 189–212
-
Chapter 13. When philosophy must become literature: Søren Kierkegaard’s concept of indirect communicationSebastian Hüsch | pp. 213–228
-
Chapter 14. An aesthetics of indirection in novels and letters: Balzac’s communication with Evelina HanskaEwa Szypula | pp. 229–246
-
Chapter 15. Letters from a (post-)troubled city: Epistolary communication in Ciaran Carson’s The Pen FriendCatherine Conan | pp. 247–265
-
Index | pp. 267–271
Cited by
Cited by 12 other publications
Pia Maria Ahlbäck, Jouni Teittinen & Maria Lassén-Seger
Chen, Yi
Fishelov, David
Ledent, Bénédicte
2014. The dialogic potential of "literary autism". In Literature as Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 22], ► pp. 99 ff. 
Lejeune, Guillaume
2014. Early Romantic hopes of dialogue. In Literature as Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 22], ► pp. 251 ff. 
Sell, Roger D.
Sell, Roger D.
2014. In dialogue with the ageing Wordsworth. In Literature as Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 22], ► pp. 161 ff. 
Sell, Roger D.
2015. Review of Kinzel & Mildorf (2014): Imaginary Dialogues in American Literature and Philosophy: Beyond the Mainstream. Language and Dialogue 5:2 ► pp. 340 ff. 
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Communication Studies
Literature & Literary Studies
Main BIC Subject
CFG: Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General