Metaphor and Gesture
Editors
| VU University Amsterdam
| Europa-Universität Viadrina, Frankfurt/Oder
This volume is the first to offer an overview on metaphor and gesture — a new multi-disciplinary area of research. Scholars of metaphor have been paying increasing attention to spontaneous gestures with speech; meanwhile, researchers in gesture studies have been focussing on the abstract ideas which receive physical representation through metaphors when speakers gesture. This book presents a snapshot of the state of the art in these converging fields, offering research papers as well as commentaries from multiple perspectives. In addition to conceptual metaphor theory it includes different theoretical approaches to semiotics, and the methods used range from controlled experimentation, to cognitive ethnography, to lexical semantic analysis. The use of metaphor in gesture is shown to reflect idiosyncracies of thought in the moment of speaking as well as structural, cultural, and interactional patterns. The series of commentaries discusses the potential importance of studying metaphor and gesture from the perspectives of such fields as anthropology, cognitive linguistics, conversation analysis, psychology, and semiotics.
[Gesture Studies, 3] 2008. ix, 306 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Contributors
|
vii–viii
|
|
Acknowledgements
|
ix
|
|
1–4
|
|
|
5–25
|
|
|
27–53
|
|
|
55–92
|
|
|
93–114
|
|
|
115–154
|
|
|
155–170
|
|
|
171–194
|
|
|
195–217
|
|
|
219–245
|
|
|
Commentaries on the value of studying metaphor and gesture from the perspectives of different disciplines
|
247
|
|
249–251
|
|
|
253–257
|
|
|
259–264
|
|
|
265–272
|
|
|
273–275
|
|
|
277–282
|
|
|
283–289
|
|
|
291–301
|
|
|
Index
|
303–306
|
“In sum, this volume represents a beginning, opens a conversation. [...] what is does deliver is very useful: thought-provoking ideas and many interesting examples of the parallel use of gestural metaphors to illustrate verbal metaphors. Perhaps the most useful aspect of the book is to show how gestural metaphors appear in actual discourse, and thus help move the theoretical discussion of metaphor away from made-up examples and purely verbal expressions of metaphor.”
L. David Ritchie, Portland State University, in Metaphor & Symbol, Vol. 25 (2010)
“This collection and the research reported in this study provide an important step forward in our understanding of the complex phenomena of metaphor and gesture. [...] For the newcomers and those who are not familiar with work on metaphor and gesture, this volume is very helpful and makes it a research topic. For those who are familiar with these research fields, the book provides useful insights and new viewpoints.”
Mohammad Rasekh Mahand, Bu-Ali Sina University, Iran, on Linguist List 20.2183
“This is a wonderful, well-written and accessible collection that provides rich examples of some of the most interesting and important contemporary research on the ties between embodiment and the distinctively human infrastructure for cognition provided by metaphor. In addition to providing a state of the art snapshot of much contemporary work on gesture, the diversity of theoretical perspectives gathered here offers illuminating examples of new and important approaches to the study of cognition, including the embodied nature of platonic structures in mathematics, to the part played by material anchors in linking cognition to the physical and social world, the biological ground provided by the symmetry of the human body, the dynamic unfolding of gesture and thought, etc. This is a very stimulating introduction to a diverse body of important work probing the relationship between the body, language and cognition.”
Charles Goodwin, UCLA
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2015.
In Creating Social Orientation Through Language [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 17],
No author info given
2015. Framing, metaphor and dialogue: A multimodal approach to party conference speeches.
Metaphor and the Social World 5:2 ► pp. 177 ff.
No author info given
2018.
In Aspectuality across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 62],
No author info given
2018.
In Attention to Metaphor [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 7],
No author info given
2020.
In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10],
No author info given
2020.
In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10],
No author info given
2020. Spatial metaphors in antonym pairs across sign languages.
Sign Language & Linguistics 23:1
Alibali, Martha W. & Mitchell J. Nathan
2012. Embodiment in Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Evidence From Learners' and Teachers' Gestures.
Journal of the Learning Sciences 21:2 ► pp. 247 ff.
ALOUSQUE, ISABEL NEGRO
2014. Verbo-pictorial metaphor in French advertising.
Journal of French Language Studies 24:2 ► pp. 155 ff.
Babena, Gilbert Willy Tio & Noussaïba Adamou
2016. L’homme politique face à ses dires : peut-on ravaler la salive crachée ?.
TIPA. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage :32
Bateman, John A
2019. Transmediality and the End of Disembodied Semiotics.
International Journal of Semiotics and Visual Rhetoric 3:2 ► pp. 1 ff.
Bietti, Lucas M
2013. Reminders as Interactive and Embodied Tools for Socially Distributed and Situated Remembering.
SAGE Open 3:3 ► pp. 215824401350133 ff.
Bietti, Lucas M & Fátima Galiana Castelló
2013. Embodied reminders in family interactions: Multimodal collaboration in remembering activities.
Discourse Studies 15:6 ► pp. 665 ff.
Catherine E. Brouwer, Dennis Day, Ulrika Ferm, Hougaard, Anders R, Gitte R Hougaard & Gunilla Thunberg
2011. Treating the actions of children as sensible: Investigating structures in interactions between children with disabilities and their parents.
Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 2:2
Che, Lang & Liqin Zha
2019.
In NeuroManagement and Intelligent Computing Method on Multimodal Interaction on - ICMI '19,
► pp. 1 ff.
Chui, Kawai
2017. Entity Metaphor, Object Gesture, and Context of Use.
Metaphor and Symbol 32:1 ► pp. 30 ff.
Cienki, Alan
2020.
In Drawing Attention to Metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5],
► pp. 63 ff.
Cienki, Alan & Dvora Yanow
2013. Why metaphor and other tropes? Linguistic approaches to analysing policies and the political.
Journal of International Relations and Development 16:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
Clarke, Jean S., Nicholas Llewellyn, Joep Cornelissen & Rowena Viney
2019. Gesture Analysis and Organizational Research: The Development and Application of a Protocol for Naturalistic Settings.
Organizational Research Methods ► pp. 109442811987745 ff.
Colston, Herbert L.
2019.
In How Language Makes Meaning,
Cornelissen, Joep P., Jean S. Clarke & Alan Cienki
2012. Sensegiving in entrepreneurial contexts: The use of metaphors in speech and gesture to gain and sustain support for novel business ventures.
International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship 30:3 ► pp. 213 ff.
Costa, Josiane Marques da & Thiago da Cunha Nascimento
2019.
In Comunicação (inter)cultural em interação,
► pp. 223 ff.
De Knop, Sabine
2015. Visualization and conceptual metaphor as tools for the teaching of abstract motion in German.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 167 ff.
Debras, Camille & Pauline Beaupoil-Hourdel
2019. Gestualité et construction des chaînes de référence dans un corpus d’interactions tandem.
Cahiers de praxématique :72
Debras, Camille & Alan Cienki
2012.
In 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing,
► pp. 932 ff.
Due, Brian Lystgaard
2018. Co-constructed imagination space: a multimodal analysis of the interactional accomplishment of imagination during idea-development meetings.
CoDesign 14:3 ► pp. 153 ff.
Ferrara, Lindsay & Gabrielle Hodge
2018. Language as Description, Indication, and Depiction.
Frontiers in Psychology 9
Fuks, Orit
2016. Intensifier actions in Israeli Sign Language (ISL) discourse.
Gesture 15:2 ► pp. 192 ff.
Gawne, Lauren & Barbara F. Kelly
2014. Revisiting Significant Action and Gesture Categorization.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 216 ff.
Gibbs, Raymond W.
2011. Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory.
Discourse Processes 48:8 ► pp. 529 ff.
Gibbs, Raymond W.
2019. Metaphor as Dynamical–Ecological Performance.
Metaphor and Symbol 34:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Gibbs, Raymond W. & Elaine Chen
2018. Metaphor and the automatic mind.
Metaphor and the Social World 8:1 ► pp. 40 ff.
Gibbs, Raymond W. & Malaika J. Santa Cruz
2012. Temporal Unfolding of Conceptual Metaphoric Experience.
Metaphor and Symbol 27:4 ► pp. 299 ff.
Harrison, Simon
2015.
In Metaphor in Specialist Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 4],
► pp. 131 ff.
Hassemer, Julius & Bodo Winter
2016. Producing and perceiving gestures conveying height or shape.
Gesture 15:3 ► pp. 404 ff.
Herrera, Juan Sebastian & Eric M. Riggs
2013. Relating Gestures and Speech: An analysis of students' conceptions about geological sedimentary processes.
International Journal of Science Education 35:12 ► pp. 1979 ff.
Holmes, Patricia & Christopher Holmes
2013. The performer’s experience: A case for using qualitative (phenomenological) methodologies in music performance research.
Musicae Scientiae 17:1 ► pp. 72 ff.
Jacquin, Jérôme
2017.
In Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres [Argumentation in Context, 14],
► pp. 240 ff.
Jankowska, Anna & Monika Zabrocka
2016.
In Researching Audio Description,
► pp. 169 ff.
Jensen, Thomas Wiben & Linda Greve
2019. Ecological Cognition and Metaphor.
Metaphor and Symbol 34:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kashanizadeh, Zahra & Charles Forceville
2020. Visual and multimodal interaction of metaphor and metonymy.
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7:1 ► pp. 78 ff.
Kiss, Dóra
2015. Les partitions chorégraphiques citant Marie-Thérèse Subligny : sources d’hypothèses pour un portrait.
Recherches en danse :3
Kociołek, Katarzyna
2018. Dress and Metaphors of Mobility in British Visual Culture.
Open Cultural Studies 2:1 ► pp. 710 ff.
Ladewig, Silva H.
2011. Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis.
CogniTextes :6
Lakens, Daniël, Iris K. Schneider, Nils B. Jostmann & Thomas W. Schubert
2011. Telling Things Apart.
Psychological Science 22:7 ► pp. 887 ff.
Lakoff, George
2012. Explaining Embodied Cognition Results.
Topics in Cognitive Science 4:4 ► pp. 773 ff.
Le Guen, Olivier
2011. Speech and Gesture in Spatial Language and Cognition Among the Yucatec Mayas.
Cognitive Science 35:5 ► pp. 905 ff.
Lederer, Jenny
2015. Exploring the Metaphorical Models of Transgenderism.
Metaphor and Symbol 30:2 ► pp. 95 ff.
Lederer, Jenny
2019. Gesturing the source domain.
Metaphor and the Social World 9:1 ► pp. 32 ff.
Lhommet, Margot & Stacy Marsella
2014.
In Intelligent Virtual Agents [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8637],
► pp. 264 ff.
Lim, Victor Fei
2019. Analysing the teachers’ use of gestures in the classroom: A Systemic Functional Multimodal Discourse Analysis approach.
Social Semiotics 29:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
Littlemore, Jeannette
2019.
In Metaphors in the Mind,
M. Lazar, Michelle
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
MacArthur, Fiona, Tina Krennmayr & Jeannette Littlemore
2015. How Basic Is“UNDERSTANDING IS SEEING” When Reasoning About Knowledge? Asymmetric Uses of Sight Metaphors in Office Hours Consultations in English as Academic Lingua Franca.
Metaphor and Symbol 30:3 ► pp. 184 ff.
MacQueen, Jim
2020.
In The Flow of Organizational Culture,
► pp. 119 ff.
Mittelberg, Irene
2007. Gesture & Thought. David McNeill, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2005, 340 pages, $38.00 (hardback). ISBN: 0-226-51462-5..
Metaphor and Symbol 22:3 ► pp. 281 ff.
Mittelberg, Irene
2017. Embodied frames and scenes.
Gesture 16:2 ► pp. 203 ff.
Mittelberg, Irene
2019. Visuo-Kinetic Signs Are Inherently Metonymic: How Embodied Metonymy Motivates Forms, Functions, and Schematic Patterns in Gesture.
Frontiers in Psychology 10
Nett, Nadine & Christian Frings
2014. Things Can Be Told Apart.
Experimental Psychology 61:2 ► pp. 142 ff.
OBEN, BERT & GEERT BRÔNE
2015. What you see is what you do: on the relationship between gaze and gesture in multimodal alignment.
Language and Cognition 7:4 ► pp. 546 ff.
Paggio, Patrizia & Costanza Navarretta
2017. The Danish NOMCO corpus: multimodal interaction in first acquaintance conversations.
Language Resources and Evaluation 51:2 ► pp. 463 ff.
Parrill, Fey & Kashmiri Stec
2017. Gestures of the abstract.
Pragmatics & Cognition 24:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Piquer-Píriz, Ana María & Rafael Alejo-González
2016. Applying Cognitive Linguistics.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Polo, Claire & Jean-Marc Colletta
2020. La médiation multimodale du savoir.
Éducation et didactique 14:1 ► pp. 9 ff.
Poppi, Fabio Indio Massimo & Peter Kravanja
2019. Actiones secundum fidei.
Metaphor and the Social World 9:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
Poppi, Fabio Indìo Massimo & Peter Kravanja
2019. Aurora musis amica: Metaphoric conceptualization of depression in online visual representations.
Visual Communication ► pp. 147035721985214 ff.
Ravenet, Brian, Catherine Pelachaud, Chloé Clavel & Stacy Marsella
2018. Automating the Production of Communicative Gestures in Embodied Characters.
Frontiers in Psychology 9
Rittelmeyer, Christian
2010.
In Sinnliche Bildung?,
► pp. 17 ff.
Rodríguez Redondo, Ana Laura
2016.
In Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 262],
► pp. 273 ff.
Rossini, Nicla
2009.
In Cross-Modal Analysis of Speech, Gestures, Gaze and Facial Expressions [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5641],
► pp. 214 ff.
Saito, Hayato & Wen-yu Chiang
2020. Political cartoons portraying the Musha Uprising in Taiwan under Japanese rule.
Metaphor and the Social World 10:1 ► pp. 76 ff.
Schrauf, Judith & Hans-Jörg Schmid
2011.
In Beratung, Coaching, Supervision,
► pp. 219 ff.
Schröder, Ulrike
2015. Metaphorical blends and their function in discourse on society: A cross-cultural study.
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 2:1 ► pp. 50 ff.
Schröder, Ulrike
2015. Society and culture as container: (Re-)drawing borders and their metaphorical foundation from a communicative and extracommunicative point of view.
International Journal of Language and Culture 2:1 ► pp. 38 ff.
Schröder, Ulrike
2019.
In Comunicação (inter)cultural em interação,
► pp. 19 ff.
Skorczynska, Hanna
2014. Metaphor and Education: Reaching Business Training Goals through Multimodal Metaphor.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116 ► pp. 2344 ff.
Tay, Dennis
2015. Metaphor in case study articles on Chinese university counseling service websites.
Chinese Language and Discourse 6:1 ► pp. 28 ff.
Tseronis, Assimakis & Charles Forceville
2017.
In Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres [Argumentation in Context, 14],
► pp. 2 ff.
van Hulst, Merlijn & Dvora Yanow
2016. From Policy “Frames” to “Framing”.
The American Review of Public Administration 46:1 ► pp. 92 ff.
Waugh, Linda R., Theresa Catalano, Khaled Al Masaeed, Tom Hong Do & Paul G. Renigar
2016.
In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 4],
► pp. 71 ff.
Wehling, Elisabeth
2017. Discourse management gestures.
Gesture 16:2 ► pp. 245 ff.
Wiseman, Rob
2014. Social Distance in Hunter-Gather Settlement Sites: A Conceptual Metaphor in Material Culture.
Metaphor and Symbol 29:2 ► pp. 129 ff.
Wiseman, Rob
2015. Interpreting Ancient Social Organization: Conceptual Metaphors and Image Schemas.
Time and Mind 8:2 ► pp. 159 ff.
Wiseman, Rob
2016. Social Distance in Settled Communities the Conceptual Metaphor, Social Distance is Physical Distance, in Action.
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 23:4 ► pp. 1023 ff.
Woelert, Peter
2011. Human cognition, space, and the sedimentation of meaning.
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10:1 ► pp. 113 ff.
Wolf, Dhana, Linn-Marlen Rekittke, Irene Mittelberg, Martin Klasen & Klaus Mathiak
2017. Perceived Conventionality in Co-speech Gestures Involves the Fronto-Temporal Language Network.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11
Zima, Elisabeth
2017.
In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58],
► pp. 301 ff.
ZIMA, ELISABETH & GEERT BRÔNE
2015. Cognitive Linguistics and interactional discourse: time to enter into dialogue.
Language and Cognition 7:4 ► pp. 485 ff.
Zlatev, Jordan
2015.
In International Handbook of Semiotics,
► pp. 1043 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General