Experimental pragmatics
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Scalars
- 2.1Background
- 2.2How have experimentalists approached the processing question?
- 2.3The on-line processing of scalars: How do pragmatic readings emerge?
- 2.4At what point do mental states figure into scalar inferences?
- 3.Referring
- 3.1Referring and adjectival modification
- 3.2Referring and authorship
- 4.Metaphor
- 4.1The Standard Pragmatic Model
- 4.2The direct access view
- 4.3The Graded Salience Hypothesis
- 4.4Metaphor as viewed by Relevance Theory
- 5.Irony
- 5.1Echoic-mention theory
- 5.2Pretense Theory
- 5.3Irony as viewed by the psycholinguistic literature
- 5.4Reconciling theory and experimentation
- 6.Summary
-
Notes
-
References
References (92)
Ackerman, B. P.
1981 “Performative bias in children’s interpretations of ambiguous referential communications.”
Child Development 52: 1224–1230.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ackerman, B. P., J. Szymanski and D. Silver
1990 “Children’s use of common ground in interpreting ambiguous referential utterances.”
Developmental Psychology 26: 234–245.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Almor, A., S. Arunachalam and B. Strickland
2007 “When the creampuff beat the boxer: working memory, cost, and function in reading metaphoric reference.”
Metaphor and Symbol 22(2): 169–193.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bambini, V. and D. Resta
2012 “Metaphor and Experimental Pragmatics: When Theory Meets Empirical Investigation.”
humana.Mente 23: 37–60.
MetBib![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barner, D., N. Brooks and A. Bale
2011 “Accessing the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic inference.”
Cognition 118(1): 84.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baron-Cohen, S., S. Wheelwright, R. Skinner, J. Martin and E. Clubley
2001 ‘The autism spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/high functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians.”
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 31: 5–17.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bašnáková J., K. Weber, K. M. Petersson, J. Van Berkum and P. Hagoort
in press. “
Beyond the Language Given: The Neural Correlates of Inferring Speaker Meaning.”
Cerebral Cortex.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Blasko, D. G. and C. M. Connine
1993 “Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of experimental psychology.”
Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19(2): 295–308.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bott, L. and I. A. Noveck
2004 “Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences.”
Journal of Memory and Language 51(3): 437–457.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bott, L., T. M. Bailey and D. Grodner
2012 “Distinguishing speed from accuracy in scalar implicatures.”
Journal of Memory and Language 66: 123–142.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Braine, M. and B. Rumain
1981 “Children’s comprehension of ‘or’: Evidence for a sequence of competencies.”
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 31: 46–70.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Breheny, R., N. Katsos and J. Williams
2006 “Are scalar implicatures generated by default?”
Cognition 100: 434–463.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Breheny, R., H. J. Ferguson and N. Katsos
2013 “Taking the epistemic step: Toward a model of on-line access to conversational implicatures.”
Cognition 126(3): 423–440.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brennan S. E. and H. H. Clark
1996 “Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation.”
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22: 1482–1493.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brennan, S. E. and J. E. Hanna
2009 “Partner-specific adaptation in dialog.”
Topics in Cognitive Science 1(2): 274–291.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown-Schmidt, S.
2009 “Partner-specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog.”
Journal of Memory and Language 61(2): 171–190.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carston, R.
2002 Thoughts and Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.
MetBib![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carston, R.
2010a “
Lexical pragmatics, ad hoc concepts and metaphor: from a relevance theory perspective.”
Italian Journal of Linguistics 22(1): 153–180.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carston, R.
2010b “
Metaphor: Ad hoc concepts, literal meaning and mental images.
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110(3): 295–321.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chevallier, C., I. Noveck, L. Bott, V. Lanza, T. Nazir and D. Sperber
2008 “Making disjunctions exclusive.”
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61(11): 1741–1760.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chevallier, C., I. Noveck, F. Happé and D. Wilson
2011 “What’s in a voice? Prosody as a test case for the Theory of Mind account of autism.”
Neuropsychologia 49(3): 507–517.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chierchia, G.
2001 “Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface.” In
Structures and beyond, ed. by
A. Belleti. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chierchia, G., D. Fox and B. Spector
to appear. “
The grammatical view of scalar implicatures and the relationship between semantics and pragmatics.” In
An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning ed. by
P. Portner,
C. Maienborn Et K von Heusinger. Berlin Mouton de Gruyter
Clark, E. V.
1990 “On the pragmatics of contrast.”
Journal of Child Language 17(2): 417–431.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, H. H. and R. J. Gerrig
1984 “On the Pretense Theory of Irony.”
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113(1): 121–126.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davies, C. and N. Katsos
2010 “Over-informative children: Production/comprehension asymmetry or tolerance to pragmatic violations?”
Lingua 120(8): 1956–1972.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Neys, W. and W. Schaeken
2007 “When people are more logical under cognitive load: Dual task impact on scalar implicature.”
Experimental Psychology 54: 128–133.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Filik, R. and L. Moxey
2010 “The on-line processing of written irony.”
Cognition 116(3): 421–436.
MetBib![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Flavell, J. H., J. R. Speer, F. L. Green, D. L. August and G. J. Whitehurst
1981 “The development of comprehension monitoring and knowledge about communication.”
Monographs of the Society for Research in Chile Development 46(5): 1–65.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gerrig, R. J. and A. F. Healy
1983 “Dual Processes in Metaphor Understanding?: Comprehension and Appreciation.”
Cognition 9(4).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geurts, B.
2010 Quantity Implicatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, R. W.
1986 “On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm.”
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115(1): 3–15.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, R. W.
1994 The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, R. W.
1999 “Interpreting what speakers say and implicate.”
Brain and Language 68(3): 466–485.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, R. W.
2002 “A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated.” Journal of Pragmatics 34(4): 457–486.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, R. J. and R. Gerrig
1989 “How context makes metaphor comprehension seem ‘special’.”
Metaphor and Symbol 4(3): 145–158.
MetBib![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs Jr, R. W. and J. F. Moise
1997 “Pragmatics in understanding what is said.”
Cognition 62(1): 51–74.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gildea, P. and S. Glucksberg
1983 “On understanding metaphor: The role of context.”
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22(5): 577–590.
MetBib![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giora, R.
1997 “Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis.”
Cognitive Linguistics 8(3): 183–206.
MetBib![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giora, R.
2002 “Literal vs. figurative language: Different or equal?”
Journal of Pragmatics 34(4): 487–506.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giora, R.
2003 On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
MetBib![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giora, R. and O. Fein
1999 “Irony: Context and salience.”
Metaphor and Symbol 14(4): 241–257.
MetBib![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giora, R., O. Fein, R. Kaufman, D. Eisenberg and S. Erez
2009 “Does an ‘ironic situation’ favor an ironic interpretation?” In
Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains and Gaps, ed. by
G. Brône and
J. Vandaele, 383–399. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, H. P.
1975 “Logic and conversation.” In
Pragmatics: A Reader, ed. by
S. Davis, 305–315. New York: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, H. P.
1989 Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grodner, D., N. M. Klein, K. M. Carbary and M. K. Tanenhaus
2010 “’Some’, and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment.”
Cognition 116: 42–55.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guasti, M. T., G. Chierchia, S. Crain, F. Foppolo, A. Gualmini and L. Meroni
2005 “Why Children and Adults Sometimes (But Not Always) Compute Implicatures.”
Language and Cognitive Processes 20: 667–696.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Happé, F. G.
1993 “Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: a test of relevance theory.”
Cognition 48(2): 101–119.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, Y. and J. Snedeker
2009 “Semantic meaning and pragmatic interpretation in 5-year-olds: Evidence from real-time spoken language comprehension.”
Developmental Psychology 45(6): 1723–1739.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Inhoff, A. W., S. D. Lima and P. J. Carroll
1984 “Contextual effects on metaphor comprehension in reading.”
Memory and Cognition 12(6): 558–567.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ironsmith, M. and G. Whitehurst
1978 “The development of listeners abilities in communication: How children deal with ambiguous information.”
Child Development 49: 348–352.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Janus, R. and T. Bever
1985 “Processing of metaphoric language: An investigation of the three-stage model of metaphor comprehension.”
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 14(5): 473–487.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jorgensen, J., G. Miller and D. Sperber
1984 “Test of the mention theory of irony.”
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113(1): 112–120.
MetBib![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Katsos, N. and D. V. Bishop
2011 “Pragmatic tolerance: Implications for the acquisition of informativeness and implicature.”
Cognition 120(1): 67–81.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keysar, B., D. J. Barr, J. A. Balin and J. S. Brauner
2000 “Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension.”
Psychological Science 11(1): 32–38.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kronmüller, E. and D. J. Barr
2007 “Perspective-free pragmatics: Broken precedents and the recovery-from-preemption hypothesis.”
Journal of Memory and Language 56(3): 436–455.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krönmuller, E., T. Morisseau and I. A. Noveck
in press. “
Show me the pragmatic contribution: A developmental investigation of referential communication.”
Journal of Child Language.
Kutas, M. and S. A. Hillyard
1984 “Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association.”
Nature 307: 161–163.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lai, V. T., T. Curran and L. Menn
2009 “Comprehending conventional and novel metaphors: an ERP study.”
Brain Research 1284: 145–55.
MetBib![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, S. C.
2000 Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marr, D.
1982 Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. New York: W.H. Freeman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Metzing, C. and S. E. Brennan
2003 “When conceptual pacts are broken: partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions.”
Journal of Memory and Language 49: 201–213.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nieuwland, M. S., T. Ditman and G. R. Kuperberg
2010 “On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities.”
Journal of Memory and Language 63(3): 324–346.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noveck, I. A.
2001 “When children are more logical than adults: Investigations of scalar implicature.”
Cognition 78: 165–188.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noveck, I. A., M. Bianco and A. Castry
2001 “The costs and benefits of metaphor.”
Metaphor and Symbol 16(1/2): 109–121.
MetBib![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noveck, I. A., R. Guelminger, N. Georgieff and N. Labruyere
2007 “What autism can reveal about every… not sentences.”
Journal of Semantics 24(1): 73–90.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noveck, I. A. and A. Posada
2003 “Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study.”
Brain and Language 85(2): 203–210.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noveck, I. A. and A. Reboul
2008 “Experimental Pragmatics: A Gricean turn in the study of language.”
Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12: 425–431.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noveck, I. A. and D. Sperber
2007 “The why and how of experimental pragmatics: The case of ‘scalar inferences’.” In
Pragmatics, ed. by
N. Burton-Roberts, 184–212. Basingstoke: Palgrave..
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noveck, I. A. and N. Spotorno
2013 “
Narrowing.” In
Brevity, ed. by
L. Goldstein. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ortony, A., D. L. Schallert, R. E. Reynolds and S. J. Antos
1978 “Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension.”
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 17(4): 465–477.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paris, S.
1973 “Comprehension of language connectives and propositional logical relationships.”
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 16: 278–291.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peleg, O., R. Giora and O. Fein
2001 “Salience and context effects: Two are better than one.”
Metaphor and Symbol 16(3/4): 173–192.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pijnacker, J., P. Hagoort, J. Buitelaar, J. P. Teunisse and B. Geurts
2009 “Pragmatic inferences in high-functioning adults with autism and Asperger syndrome.”
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 39(4): 607–618.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pouscoulous, N., I. A. Noveck, G. Politzer and A. Bastide
2007 “A developmental investigation of processing costs in implicature production.”
Language Acquisition 14: 347–375.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pynte, J., M. Besson, F. H. Robichon and J. Poli
1996 “The time-course of metaphor comprehension: An event-related potential study.”
Brain and Language 55(3): 293–316.
MetBib![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rubio Fernández, P.
2007 “Suppression in metaphor interpretation: Differences between meaning selection and meaning construction.”
Journal of Semantics 24(4): 345–371.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, J. R.
1979 Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shintel, H. and B. Keysar
2009 “Less is more: A minimalist account of joint action in communication.”
Topics in Cognitive Science 1(2): 260–273.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, D. and I. A. Noveck
2004 “Introduction.” In
Experimental Pragmatics, ed. by
I. A. Noveck and
D. Sperber, 1–22. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson
1981 “Irony and the use-mention distinction.” In
Radical pragmatics, ed. by
P. Cole, 295–318. New York: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson
1986 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell; 2nd edition 1995.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson
2008 “A deflationary account of metaphors.” In
The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, ed. by
R. W. Gibbs, 84–105. New York: Cambridge Univesity Press.
MetBib.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spotorno, N., E. Koun, J. Prado, J.-B. Van Der Henst and I. A. Noveck
2012 “Neural evidence that utterance-processing entails mentalizing: The case of irony.”
NeuroImage 63(1): 25–39.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spotorno, N., J.-B. Van Der Henst, A. Cheylus, and I. A. Noveck
2013 “What's behind a p600? Integration operation during irony processing.”
pLoS one 63(1):
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sternberg, R. J.
1979 “Developmental patterns in the encoding and combination of logical connectives.”
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 28(3): 469–498.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Der Henst, J. B. and D. Sperber
2004 “Testing the cognitive and the communicative principles of relevance.” In
Experimental pragmatics, ed. by
I. Noveck and
D. Sperber, 141–171. London: Palgrave Macmillan..
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, D.
2009 “Irony and metarepresentation.”
UCLWPL 21(
June): 183–226.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, D. and R. Carston
2007 “A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts.” In
Pragmatics, ed. by
N. Burton-Roberts, 230–259. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, D. and D. Sperber
2012a “
Explaining Irony.” In
Meaning and Relevance, ed. by
D. Wilson and
D. Sperber, 123–145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, D. and D. Sperber
2012b Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Ruth M. J. Byrne & Sangeet S. Khemlani
2024.
Models of Possibilities Instead of Logic as the Basis of Human Reasoning.
Minds and Machines 34:3
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.