Limiting the Iconic
From the metatheoretical foundations to the creative possibilities of iconicity in language
| University of Ghent
Iconicity has become a popular notion in contemporary linguistic research. This book is the first to present a synthesis of the vast amount of scholarship on linguistic iconicity which has been produced in the previous decades, ranging from iconicity in phonology and morpho-syntax to the role of iconicity in language change. An extensive analysis is provided of some basic but nonetheless fundamental questions relating to iconicity in language, including: what is a linguistic sign and how are linguistic signs different from signs in general? What is an iconic sign and how may iconicity be involved in language? How does iconicity pertain to the relation between language and cognition? This book offers a new and comprehensive theoretical framework for iconicity in language. It is argued that the linguistic sign is fundamentally arbitrary, but that iconicity may be involved on a secondary level, adding extra meaning to an utterance.
[Iconicity in Language and Literature, 6] 2008. xiii, 286 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Acknowledgements
|
ix
|
|
Introduction
|
1–5
|
|
1. Language and reality in early Greek thought: Tracing back the roots of iconicity in language
|
7–30
|
|
2. "L'arbitraire du signe": A Saussurian dogma?
|
31–45
|
|
3. Iconicity: A semiotic approach
|
47–82
|
|
4. Jakobson's quest for the essence of language: A prelude to a theory of linguistic iconicity
|
83–90
|
|
5. Iconicity in language: General classification and specific principles
|
91–172
|
|
6. Cognitive foundations for iconicity in language
|
173–221
|
|
7. Double negation: An iconic account
|
223–249
|
|
Conclusions
|
251–255
|
|
References
|
257–274
|
|
Author index
|
275–277
|
|
Language index
|
279
|
|
Subject index
|
281–286
|
“Growing out of the author's dissertation, this book reads every bit like a monograph by a seasoned linguist. The survey of the literature on the topic is thorough and the author's critiques of previous scholars' theories and constructs are detailed, careful, and balanced. Of all the chapters, Chapter 5 strikes this reviewer as the most substantive and impressive: De Cuypere analyzes major works on iconicity to argue that most of these authors are off the mark. You think hard and eventually agree that he makes sense. At the end of the book, you think hard again and decide that he is largely right. Then you realize that you have read a very good book, a very important book, a book that you would come back to for information and inspiration later in your work.”
Rong Chen, California State University, San Bernardino, on Linguist List 20-1353, 2009
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2016.
In Textplicating Iconophones [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 72],
No author info given
2017.
In Nicht-ikonische Chronologie,
► pp. 286 ff.
No author info given
2020. Iconicity in syntax and the architecture of linguistic theory.
Studies in Language 44:1
Benczes, Réka
2019.
In Rhyme over Reason,
Calfoglou, Christine
2014.
In Literary Translation,
► pp. 99 ff.
Carling, Gerd & Niklas Johansson
2014. Motivated language change: processes involved in the growth and conventionalization of onomatopoeia and sound symbolism.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 46:2 ► pp. 199 ff.
Deumert, Ana
2017.
In Language Contact in Africa and the African Diaspora in the Americas [Creole Language Library, 53],
► pp. 101 ff.
Fortescue, Michael
2014. The Iconicity of Lengthening and Reduplicating Suffixes in Nuuchahnulth.
International Journal of American Linguistics 80:4 ► pp. 533 ff.
Joseph, John E.
2015. Iconicity in Saussure's Linguistic Work, and why it does not contradict the arbitrariness of the sign.
Historiographia Linguistica 42:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
Kirichenko, Alexander
2016. The Art of Transference.
Mnemosyne 69:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Panagiotidou, Maria-Eirini
2017.
In Dimensions of Iconicity [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 15],
Rainer, Franz, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Francesco Gardani & Hans Christian Luschützky
2014.
In Morphology and Meaning [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 327],
► pp. 3 ff.
Rozhanskiy, Fedor
2015. Two semantic patterns of reduplication.
Studies in Language 39:4 ► pp. 992 ff.
Rupp, Laura & David Britain
2019.
In Linguistic Perspectives on a Variable English Morpheme,
► pp. 1 ff.
Rupp, Laura & David Britain
2019.
In Linguistic Perspectives on a Variable English Morpheme,
► pp. 25 ff.
Rupp, Laura & David Britain
2019.
In Linguistic Perspectives on a Variable English Morpheme,
► pp. 321 ff.
Schwenter, Scott A.
2016.
In The Handbook of Portuguese Linguistics,
► pp. 425 ff.
Smith, Chris A.
2016. Tracking semantic change in fl- monomorphemes in the Oxford English Dictionary
.
Journal of Historical Linguistics 6:2 ► pp. 165 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 may 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Philosophy
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number: 2008009389