Choosing a Grammar

Learning paths and ambiguous evidence in the acquisition of syntax

| Ewha Womans University
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027257215 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027265913 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
This book investigates the role that ambiguous evidence can play in the acquisition of syntax. To illustrate this, the book introduces a probabilistic learning model for syntactic parameters that learns a grammar of best fit to the learner’s evidence. The model is then applied to a range of cross-linguistic case studies – in Swiss German, Korean, and English – involving child errors, grammatical variability, and implicit negative evidence. Building on earlier work on language modeling, this book is unique for its focus on ambiguous evidence and its careful attention to the effects of parameters interacting with each other. This allows for a novel and principled account of several acquisition puzzles. With its inter-disciplinary approach, this book will be of broad interest to syntacticians, language acquisitionists, and cognitive scientists of language.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 238]  2017.  ix, 332 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Preface
ix
Introduction
1–40
The learning model
41–100
The acquisition of verb movement in Swiss German: Modeling child production errors and variability
101–178
Head-finality and verb movement in Korean: Modeling variability and non-variability across learners
179–242
The case of zero-derived causatives in English: Learning from implicit negative evidence
243–286
Learning biases
287–314
Final summary
315–316
References
317–325
Swiss German input types and corresponding compatible grammars
327–328
Additional evidence for a Root-selecting grammar in English?
329–330
Index
331–332
References

References

Abe, Jun
1993Binding Conditions and Scrambling without A/A’ Distinction. PhD dissertation, The University of Connecticut.
Ambridge, Ben, Pine, Julian M., Rowland, Caroline F., Jones, Rebecca L. & Clark, Victoria
2009A semantics-based approach to the “no negative evidence” problem. Cognitive Science 33(7): 1301–1316. Crossref link
Anderssen, Merete, Bentzen, Kristine, Rodina, Yulia, & Westergaard, Marit
2011The acquisition of apparent optionality: Word order in subject and object shift constructions in Norwegian. In Variation in the Input: Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, Merete Anderssen, Kristine Bentzen & Marit Westergaard (eds), 241–270. Dordrecht: Springer. Crossref link
Atkinson, Martin
2001Learnability and the acquisition of syntax. In Language Acquisition and Learnability, Stefano Bartolo (ed), 15–80. Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
Bach, Emmon
1962The order of elements in a transformational grammar of German. Language 38(3): 263–269. Crossref link
Baker, Mark
2001The Atoms of Language: The Mind’s Hidden Rules of Grammar. New York NY: Basic Books.
Berwick, Robert. C.
1986Learning from positive-only examples: The Subset Principle and three case studies. In Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, Vol. 2, Ryszard. S. Michalski, Jaime. C. Carbonell & Tom. M. Mitchell (eds), 625–645. San Mateo CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Biberauer, Theresa, Holmberg, Anders & Roberts, Ian
2014A syntactic universal and its consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 45(2): 169–225. Crossref link
Blanco, Mercedes Tubino
2010Contrasting Causatives: A Minimalist Approach. PhD dissertation, The University of Arizona.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David
2000The Rich Agreement Hypothesis in Review. Ms, McGill University.
2001The implication of rich agreement: Why morphology doesn’t drive syntax. In Proceedings of the 20th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 20), Karin Megerdoomian & Leora Bar-el (eds), 82–95. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Boersma, Paul
1997How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. In Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences 21, Rob J. J. H. van Son (ed), 43–58. Amsterdam: The University of Amsterdam.
Borer, Hagit
2005Structuring Sense, Vols. I & II. Oxford: OUP. Crossref link
Bowerman, Melissa
1988The ‘no negative evidence’ problem: How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar? In Explaining Language Universals, J.A. Hawkins (ed), 73–101. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Boyd, Jeremy K. & Goldberg, Adele E.
2011Learning what not to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in a-adjective production. Language 82(1): 55–83. Crossref link
Braine, Martin D. S.
1971On two types of models of the internalization of grammars. In The Ontogenesis of Grammar: A theoretical Symposium, Daniel Slobin (ed), 153–186. New York NY: Academic Press.
Bresnan, Joan, Asudeh, Ash, Toivonen, Ida & Wechsler, Stephen
2016Lexical-Functional Syntax. Malden MA: Wiley Blackwell.
Cho, Sook Whan
1981The Acquisition of Word Order in Korean. MA thesis, The University of Calgary.
Cho, Young-Mee Yu & Hong, Ki-Sun
1988Evidence for the VP constituent from child Korean. In Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 27. Stanford CA: Department of Linguistics, Stanford University.
Cho, Sae-Youn
1993Auxiliary verb constructions in Korean. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 23(2): 1–24.
Cho, Young-Mee Yu & Sells, Peter
1995A lexical account of inflectional suffixes in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4(2): 119–174. Crossref link
Choe, Hyon Sook
1987Successive-cyclic rightward movement in Korean. In Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 2: Proceedings of the 1987 Harvard Workshop on Korean Linguistics, Susumu Kuno et al. (eds), 40–56. Seoul: Hanshin.
Choi, Young-Sik
1999Negation, its scope and NPI licensing in Korean. In ESCOL ’99, Rebecca Daly & Anastasia Riehl (eds), 25–36. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, CLC Publications.
Chomsky, Noam
1956Three models for the description of language. IRE Transactions on Information Theory 2(3): 113–124. Crossref link
1957Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
1980Rules and Representations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
1986Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York, NY: Praeger.
Chung, Daeho
2005What does bare –ko coordination say about post-verbal morphology in Korean? Lingua 115(4): 549–568. Crossref link
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.
2006Restructuring and Functional Heads: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 4 Oxford: OUP.
Clahsen, Harald
1982Spracherwerb in der Kindheit: Eine Untersuchung zur Entwicklung der Syntax bei Kleinkindern. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Clahsen, Harald & Smolka, Klaus-Dirk
1986Psycholinguistic evidence and the V-Second in German. In Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages, Hubert Haider & Martin Prinzhorn (eds), 137–167. Dordrecht: Foris. Crossref link
Clark, Robin
1989On the relationship between the input data and parameter setting. In Proceedings of the Northeast Linguistic Society (NELS) 19, Juli Carter & Rose-Mari Déchaine (eds), 48–62. Amherst MA: GLSA.
1992The selection of syntactic knowledge. Language Acquisition 2(2): 85–149. Crossref link
Clark, Robin & Roberts, Ian
1993A computational model of language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry 24(2): 299–345.
Crain, Stephen & Thornton, Rosalind
1998Investigations into Universal Grammar: A Guide to Experiments in the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Davies, Mark
2008–2015The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 Million Words, 1990-present. http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coca/
den Besten, Hans
1977On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive verbs. Ms, MIT and Universiteit van Amsterdam. Appeared in den Besten (1989).
1989Studies in West Germanic Syntax. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
den Dikken, Marcel
2006A reappraisal of vP being phasal. Ms, CUNY Graduate Center.
Déprez, Viviane & Pierce, Amy
1993Negation and functional projections in early grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 24(1): 25–67.
Diesing, Molly
1992Indefinites. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Do, Young Ah
2013Biased Learning of Phonological Alternations. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Dowty, David R.
1979Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. Crossref link
Dryer, Matthew S.
1991SVO languages and the OV/VO typology. Journal of Linguistics 27(2): 443–482. Crossref link
Embick, David & Noyer, Ralf
2001Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32(4): 555–595. Crossref link
Ernst, Thomas
2002The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: CUP.
Fodor, Janet Dean
1998Unambiguous triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 29(1): 1–36. Crossref link
Fodor, Jerry
1970Three reasons for not deriving ‘kill’ from ‘cause to die’. Linguistic Inquiry 1(4): 429–438.
Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi
2005“Flavors of v: Consuming results in Italian and English. In Aspectual Inquiries, Roumyana Slabakova & Paula Kempchinsky (eds), 95–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Foraker, Stephani, Regier, Terry, Khetarpal, Naveen, Perfors, Amy & Tenenbaum, Joshua
2009Indirect evidence and the poverty of the stimulus: The case of anaphoric one . Cognitive Science 33(2): 287–300. Crossref link
Frank, Robert & Kapur, Shyam
1996On the use of triggers in parameter setting. Linguistic Inquiry 27(4): 623–660.
Frigyik, Bela A., Kapila, Amol & Gupta, Maya R.
2010Introduction to the Dirichlet distribution and related processes [UWEE Technical Report: Number UWEETR-2010–0006]. Seattle WA: Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Washington.
Fukuda, Shin & Choi, Soonja
2009The acquisition of transitivity in Japanese and Korean children. In Japanese and Korean Linguistics 17, Shoichi Iwasaki, Hajime Hoji, Patricia Clancy & Sung-Och Sohn (eds), 613–624. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Gawlitzek-Maiwald, Ira, Tracy, Rosemarie & Fritzenschaft, Agnes
1992Language acquisition and competing linguistic representations: The child as arbiter. In The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition, Jürgen M. Meisel (ed), 139–179. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Gibson, Edward & Wexler, Ken
1994Triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 25(3): 407–454.
Gold, E. Mark
1967Language identification in the limit. Information and Control 10(5): 447–474. Crossref link
Goldberg, Adele E.
2011Corpus evidence of the viability of statistical preemption. Cognitive Linguistics 22(1): 131–153. Crossref link
Goodman, Noah, Mansinghka, Vikash, Roy, Daiel, Bonawitz, Keith & Tenenbaum, Joshua
2008Church: A language for generative models. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-08), David McAllester & Petri Myllymaki (eds), 220–229. Corvallis OR: AUAI Press.
de Haan, Germen & Weerman, Fred
1986Finiteness and verb fronting in Frisian. In Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages, Hubert Haider & Martin Prinzhorn (eds), 77–110. Dordrecht: Foris. Crossref link
Hagstrom, Paul
1995Negation, Focus, and do-Support in Korean. Ms, MIT.
2002Implications of child errors for the syntax of negation in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11(3): 211–242. Crossref link
Haider, Hubert
2010The Syntax of German. Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
Hale, Ken & Keyser, Samuel Jay
2002Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Han, Chung-hye, Lidz, Jeffrey & Musolino, Julien
2007V-raising and grammar competition in Korean: Evidence from negation and quantifier scope”. Linguistic Inquiry 38(1): 1–47. Crossref link
Han, Chung-hye, Storoshenko, Dennis Ryan & Sakurai, Yasuko
2008An experimental investigation into the placement of the verb in the clause structure of Japanese. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Linguistics in Korea (ICLK-2007). Seoul: The Linguistic Society of Korea.
Han, Chung-hye, Lidz, Jeffrey & Storoshenko, Dennis Ryan
2014Variation in negation and quantifier scope judgments in Korean. In Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. 2, Carissa Abrego-Collier, Arum Kang, Martina Martinović & Chieu Nguyen (eds), 65–76. Chicago IL: The Chicago Linguistic Society.
Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika
1998Semantics in Generative Grammar. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Hoekstra, Teun & Hyams, Nina
1998Aspects of root infintives. Lingua 106(1–4): 81–112. Crossref link
Holmberg, Anders
2015Verb second. In Syntax – Theory and Analysis: An International Handbook of Syntactic Research, Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 342–382. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hsu, Anne S. & Griffiths, Thomas L.
2009Differential use of implicit negative evidence in generative and discriminative language learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 22, Yoshua Bengio, Dale Schuurmans, John D. Lafferty, Christopher K. I. Williams & Aron Culotta (eds), 754–762.
Hyams, Nina
1986Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel. Crossref link
Johnson, Mark, Griffiths, Thomas L. & Goldwater, Sharon
2007Bayesian inference for PCFGs via Markov Chain Monte Carlo. In Human Language Technologies 2007: The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Main Conference, Candace Sidner, Tanja Schultz, Matthew Stone & ChengXiang Zhai (eds), 139–146. Stroudsburg PA: The Association for Computational Linguistics.
Joo, Yanghee
1989A Cross-linguistic Approach to Quantification in Syntax. PhD dissertation, The University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Josefsson, Gunlög
1996[2013] The acquisition of object shift in Swedish child language. In Child Language, Vol. 9, Carolyn E. Johnson & John H. V. Gilbert (eds), 153–165. Hove: Psychology Press.
Kayne, Richard
1994The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Kemp, Charles, Perfors, Amy & Tenenbaum, Joshua
2007Learning overhypotheses with hierarchical Bayesian models. Developmental Science 10(3): 307–321. Crossref link
Kim, Young-Joo
1997The acquisition of Korean. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 4, Dan Isaac Slobin (ed), 335–443. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2000Subject/Object drop in the acquisition of Korean: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9(4): 325–351. Crossref link
Klima, Edward & Bellugi, Ursula
1966Syntactic regularities in the speech of children. In Psycholinguistic Papers, John Lyons & Roger Wales (eds), 183–208. Edinburgh: EUP.
Koizumi, Masatoshi
2000String vacuous overt verb-raising. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9(3): 227–285. Crossref link
Koopman, Hilda
2005Korean (and Japanese) morphology from a syntactic perspective. Linguistic Inquiry 36(4): 601–633. Crossref link
Koster, Jan
1975Dutch as an SOV language. Linguistic Analysis 1: 111–136.
Kratzer, Angelika
1996Severing the external argument from the verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Johann Rooryck & Zaring, Laurie (eds), 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Kratzer, Kai, Berryman, Joshua T., Taudt, Aaron, Zeman, Johannes & Arnold, Alex
2014The Flexible Rare Event Sampling Harness System (FRESHS). Computer Physics Communications 185(7): 1875–1885. Crossref link
Kroch, Anthony
1989Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1(3): 199–244. Crossref link
Kuroda, Shige-Yuki
1970Japanese Syntax and Semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Laplace, Pierre-Simon
1825Philosophical Essay on Probabilities, translated by Andrew I. Dale (1995) from the fifth French edition. New York NY: Springer.
Lee, Jae Hong
1993Postverbal adverbs and verb movement in Korean. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics 2, Patricia Marie Clancy & Hajime Hoji (eds), 429–446. Stanford CA: SLA/CSLI.
Lee, Jungmee
2008The temporal interpretation of the Korean –ko construction: Aktionsart and Discourse Context. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 12, Atle Grønn (ed), 367–383. Oslo.
Lee, Jungmee & Tonhauser, Judith
2010Temporal interpretation without tense: Korean and Japanese coordination constructions. Journal of Semantics 27(3): 307–341. Crossref link
Legate, Julie Anne
2003Some interface properties of the phase. Linguistic Inquiry 34(3): 506–515. Crossref link
Legate, Julie Anne & Yang, Charles
2007Morphosyntactic learning and the development of tense. Language Acquisition 14(3): 315–344. Crossref link
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1995Unaccusativity. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Lightfoot David
1989The child’s trigger experience: Degree-0 learnability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12(2): 321–334. Crossref link
Lightfoot, David
1991How to Set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
1997Shifting triggers and diachronic reanalysis. In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds), 253–272. Cambridge: CUP.
MacWhinney, Brian
2000The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, 3rd edn. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Magri, Giorgio
2013HG has no computational advantages over OT: Toward a new toolkit for computational OT. Linguistic Inquiry 44(4): 569–609. Crossref link
Marantz, Alec
1988Clitics, morphological merger, and the mapping to phonological structure. In Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics, Michael Hammond & Michael Noonan (eds), 253–270. San Diego CA: Academic Press.
1997No escape from syntax: Don’t attempt morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2): 201–225.
Meinunger, André
2007About object es in the German vorfeld . Linguistic Inquiry 38(3): 553–563. Crossref link
Mills, Anne E.
1985The acquisition of German. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vo1. 1: The Data, Dan Isaac Slobin (ed), 141–254. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Miyagawa, Shigeru
2001The EPP, scrambling, and wh-in-situ. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed), 293–338. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Müller, Natascha
1993Komplexe Sätze: Der Erwerb von Comp und von Wortstellungsmustern bei Bilingualen Kindern (Französisch/Deutsch). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Netter, Klaus
1992On non-head non-movement. In KONVENS 92, Günter Görz (ed), 218–227. Berlin: Springer. Crossref link
Otani, Kazuyo & Whitman, John
1991V-raising and VP-ellipsis. Linguistics Inquiry 22(2): 345–358.
Park, Myung-Kan
1994A Morpho-Syntactic Study of Korean Verbal Inflection. PhD dissertation, The University of Connecticut.
Parsons, Terence
1990Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Payne, John, Pullum, Geoffrey K., Scholz, Barabara C. & Berlage, Eva
2013Anaphoric one and its implications. Language 89(4): 794–829. Crossref link
Pearl, Lisa
2007Necessary Bias in Natural Language Learning. PhD dissertation, The University of Maryland.
Pearl, Lisa & Goldwater, Sharon
2016Statistical learning, inductive bias, and Bayesian inference in language acquisition. In The Oxford Handbook of Developmental Linguistics, Jeffrey Lidz, William Snyder & Joe Pater (eds), 664–695. Oxford: OUP.
Pearl, Lisa & Lidz, Jeffrey
2009When domain-general learning fails and when it succeeds: Identifying the contribution of domain specificity. Language Learning and Development 5(4): 235–265. Crossref link
Pearl, Lisa & Mis, Benjamin
2011How far can indirect evidence take us? Anaphoric one revisited. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2011), Laura Carlson, Christoph Hoelscher & Thomas F. Shipley (eds), 879–884. Austin TX: Cognitive Science Society.
2016The role of indirect positive evidence in syntactic acquisition. Language 92(1): 1–30. Crossref link
Penner, Zvi
1990On the acquisition of verb placement and Verb Projection Raising in Bernese Swiss German. In Spracherwerv und Grammatik: Linguistische Untersuchungen zum Erwerb von Syntax und Morphologie, Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 3, Monika Rothweiler (ed), 166–189. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Crossref link
1996From Empty to Doubly-Filled Complementizers: A Case Study in the Acquisition of Subordination in Bernese Swiss German [Arbeitspapier Nr. 77]. Konstanz: Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Konstanz.
Perfors, Amy, Tenenbaum, Joshua & Regier, Terry
2006Poverty of the stimulus? A rational approach. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2006), Ron Sun & Naomi Miyake (eds), 663–668. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Perfors, Amy, Tenenbaum, Joshua B. & Gibson, Edward & Regier, Terry
2010aHow recursive is language? A Bayesian exploration. In Recursion and Human Language, Harry van der Hulst (ed), 159–175. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. Crossref link
Perfors, Amy, Tenenbaum, Joshua B. & Wonnacott, Elizabeth
2010bVariability, negative evidence, and the acquisition of verb argument constructions. Journal of Child Language 37(3): 607–642. Crossref link
Perfors, Amy, Tenenbaum, Joshua B. & Regier, Terry
2011The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition 118(3): 306–338. Crossref link
Perlmutter, David
1978Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. In Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 4, 157–189. Berkeley CA: The University of California.
Pierce, Amy
1992Language Acquisition and Syntactic Theory: A Comparative Analysis of French and English Child Grammars. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Pinker, Steven
2013[1989] Learnability and Cognition. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Pintzuk, Susan
2002Verb-object order in Old English: Variation as grammatical competition. In Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, David Lightfoot (ed), 276–300. Oxford: OUP. Crossref link
Platzack, Christer
1986Comp, Infl, and Germanic word order. In Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, Lars Hellan & Kristi Koch (eds), 185–234. Dordrecht: Reidel. Crossref link
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20(3): 365–424.
Pylkkänen, Liina
2008Introducing Arguments. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Crossref link
Ramchand, Gillian Catriona
2008Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First-Phase Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
Regier, Terry & Gahl, Susanne
2004Learning the unlearnable: The role of missing evidence. Cognition 93(2): 147–155. Crossref link
Rizzi, Luigi
1993/1994Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of Root Infinitives. Language Acquisition 3(4): 371–393. Crossref link
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Roberts, Ian
1997Directionality and word order change in the history of English. In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds), 397–426. Cambridge: CUP.
Rosengren, Inger
2002EPP: A syntactic device in the service of semantics. Studia Linguistica 56(2): 145–190. Crossref link
Ross, John Robert
1967Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Rothweiler, Monika
1993Der Erwerb von Nebensätzen in Deutschen: Eine Pilotstudie. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. Crossref link
Safir, Ken
1987Comments on Wexler and Manzini. In Parameter Setting, Thomas Roeper & Edwin Williams (eds), 77–90. Dordrecht: Reidel. Crossref link
Sag, Ivan A., Wasow, Thomas & Bender, Emily M.
2003Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Sakas, William Gregory
2003A word-order database for testing computational models of language acquisition. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL ’03), Vol. 1, Erhard W. Hinrichs & Dan Roth (eds), 415–422. Stroudsburg PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Sakas, William Gregory & Dean Fodor, Janet
2001The structural triggers learner. In Language Acquisition and Learnability, Stefano Bartolo (ed), 172–233. Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
2012Disambiguating syntactic triggers. Language Acquisition 19(2): 83–143. Crossref link
Schönenberger, Manuela
2001Embedded V-to-C in Child Grammar: The Acquisition of Verb Placement in Swiss German. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
2008Three acquisition puzzles and the relation between input and output. In First Language Acquisition of Morphology and Syntax [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 45], Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes, María Pilar Larrañaga & John Clibbens (eds), 87–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Schwartz, Bonnie & Vikner, Sten
1996The verb always leaves IP in V2 clauses. In Parameters and Functional Heads: Essays in Comparative Syntax, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 11–62. Oxford: OUP.
Schweikert, Walter
2005The Order of Prepositional Phrases in the Structure of the Clause [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 83]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Sells, Peter
1995Korean and Japanese morphology from a lexical perspective. Linguistic Inquiry 26(2): 277–325.
2001Structure, Alignment, and Optimality in Swedish. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Snyder, William
2007Child Language: The Parametric Approach. Oxford: OUP.
Stowell, Timothy
1981Origins of Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Stromswold, Karin
1990Learnability and the Acquisition of Auxiliaries. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Takano, Yuji
2002Surprising constituents. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11(3): 243–301. Crossref link
Tenny, Carol L.
2000Core events and adverbial modification. In Events as Grammatical Objects, Carol L. Tenny & James Pustejovsky (eds), 285–334. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Travis, Lisa deMena
1984Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Vecchiato, Antonella
2011Events in the Grammar of Direct and Indirect Causation. PhD dissertation, The University of Southern California.
Waldmann, Christian
2011Moving in small steps towards Verb Second: A case study. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 34(3): 331–359. Crossref link
2014The acquisition of Neg-V and V-Neg order in embedded clauses in Swedish: A microparametric approach. Language Acquisition 21(1): 45–71. Crossref link
Westergaard, Marit R.
2006Triggering V2: The amount of input needed for parameter setting in a Split-CP model. In Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of GALA 2005, Adriana Belletti, Elisa Bennati, Cristiano Chesi, Elisa DiDomenico & Ida Ferrari (eds), 564–577. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Westergaard, Marit
2009Usage-based vs. rule-based learning: The acquisition of word order in wh-questions in English and Norwegian. Journal of Child Language 36(5): 1023–1051. Crossref link
Wexler, Kenneth
1998Very early parameter setting and the Unique Checking Constraint: A new explanation of the Optional Infinitive stage. Lingua 106: 23–79. Crossref link
2011Grammatical computation in the Optional Infinitive stage. In Handbook of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition, Jill de Villiers & Thomas Roeper (eds), 53–118. Dordrecht: Springer. Crossref link
Wexler, Kenneth & Manzini, M. Rita
1987Parameters and learnability in Binding Theory. In Parameter Setting, Thomas Roeper & Edwin Williams (eds), 41–76. Dordrecht: Reidel. Crossref link
Wilson, Colin
2006Learning phonology with substantive bias: An experimental and computational study of velar palatalization. Cognitive Science 30(5): 945–982. Crossref link
Wurmbrand, Susi
2005Verb clusters, Verb Raising and Restructuring. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. 5, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 227–341. Oxford: Blackwell.
Yang, Charles
2002Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Oxford: OUP.
Yoon, James Hye Suk
1994Korean verbal inflection and Checking Theory. In The Morphology-Syntax Connection [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 22], Heidi Harley & Colin Phillips (eds), 251–270. Cambridge MA: MIT.
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter
1997The Morphosyntax of Verb Movement: A Minimalist Approach to Dutch syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Subjects
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009060 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Syntax
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2017002159