Right Peripheral Fragments

Right dislocation and related phenomena in Romance

| University of Gdańsk
ISBN 9789027204776 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
ISBN 9789027261694 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
In recent years, a number of authors (De Vries 2009, Truckenbrodt 2015, Ott and de Vries 2016, inter alia) have defended that right dislocations (RD) should be treated as bisentential structures, where the “dislocated” constituent is actually a remnant of a clausal ellipsis operation licensed under identity with an antecedent clause. Although Romance RD is a fertile area of research, the consequences of the biclausal analysis remain unexplored in these languages. This monograph intends to fill this gap. Adopting this approach not only solves some issues that have always been at the core of dislocation structures in general; it also allows us to uncover novel sets of data and to provide straightforward explanations for well-known generalizations. Further, it brings RD along with a set of phenomena which are structurally very similar, like afterthoughts or split questions, which have been independently argued to display a bisentential structure. Under alternative, monoclausal approaches to RD, the striking similarities between these phenomena must be rendered anecdotal.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 258]  2020.  ix, 214 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Chapter 1. Introduction
Chapter 2. A tale of two clauses
Chapter 3. Previous accounts
Chapter 4. Locality without movement
Chapter 5. Other right peripheral fragments
Chapter 6. Concluding remarks
“This monograph will be of high interest to researchers investigating generative syntax, especially those interested in the phenomena related to the peripheries, as this book provides a particularly interesting angle of analysis. The overview of the monoclausal approaches to RD seems quite complete, and exhaustive enough for readers who are less acquainted with dislocation to be able to follow the explanations and arguments for or against each approach. The number of examples throughout the book is also quite impressive, and really allows the reader to understand each point of the argumentation, even though in some instances, the author could have included more explanation on how the example illustrates the argument put forward. Nevertheless, the content of this book is still accessible and easy to read.”


Abe, Jun 2014Make short answers shorter: Support for the in-situ approach. Ms, Tohoko Gakuin University.
2015The In-situ Approach to Sluicing [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 222]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Abe, Jun & Tancredi, Christopher
2013Non-constituent deaccenting and deletion: A phase-based approach. Ms, Tohoku Gakuin University and Keio Tancredi.Google Scholar
Abeillé, Anne, Bîlbie, Gabriela & Mouret, François
2014A Romance perspective on gapping constructions. In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 15], Hans C. Boas & Francisco Gonzálvez-García (eds), 227–265. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Abels, Klaus
2012aDon’t repair that island! It ain’t broke. Presented at Islands in Contemporary Linguistic Theory. < https:/​/ehutb​.ehu​.eus​/video​/58c66684f82b2b4c3a8b45e6 > Google Scholar
2012bThe Italian left periphery: A view from locality. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 229–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Locality of covert operations: Lessons from multiple sluicing. Paper presented at the Ellipsis across Borders Conference, 20–21 June, Sarajevo University.Google Scholar
Abels, Klaus & Neeleman, Ad
2009Universal 20 without the LCA. In Merging Features: Computation, Interpretation, and Acquisition, José M. Brucart, Anna Gavarró & Joan Solà (eds). Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aboh, Enoch
2004The Morphosyntax of Complement – Head Sequences. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad
2004Beyond Morphology: Interface Conditions on Word Formation. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adger, David
2003Core Syntax. A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Aelbrecht, Lobke
2011The Syntactic Licensing of Ellipsis [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 149]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2016What ellipsis can do for phases, and what it can’t, but not why. Linguistic Review 33(4): 453–482. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin
1989Themes and tails: The discourse functions of dislocated elements. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 12: 137–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
An, Duk-Ho
2007Syntax at the PF Interface: Prosodic Mapping, Linear Order, and Deletion. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Anagnostopoulou, Elena
1997Clitic left disloation and contrastive left dislocation. In Materials on Left Dislocation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 14], Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds), 151–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003The Syntax of Ditransitives: Evidence from Clitics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena 2006Clitic doubling. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. 1, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 519–581. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Angelopoulos, Nikos and Dominique, Sportiche
2017Scrambling(s)+clitics=CLLD (The case of French). Paper presented at the 2016 Going Romance conference at Goethe Universität FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
Arregi, Karlos
2003Clitic left dislocation is contrastive topicalization. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 9(1): 31–44.Google Scholar
2010Ellipsis in split questions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28: 539–592. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Astruc, Lluisa
2004Right dislocations: Influence of information structure on prosodic phrasing and intonation. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1: 1–14.Google Scholar
Authier, J.-Marc & Haegeman, Liliane
2015French adverbial clayses, rescue by ellipsis and the truncation vs intervention approach. Probus 27: 33–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Averintseva-Klisch, Maria
2008aGerman right dislocation and afterthought in discourse. In Constraints in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 172], Anton Benz & Peter Kühnlein (eds), 225–247. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008bTo the right of the clause: Right dislocation vs. afterthought. In ‘Subordination’ vs. ‘Coordination’ in Sentence and Text. A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 98], Catherine Fabricius-Hansen & Wiebke Ramm (eds), 217–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Averintseva-Klisch, Maria & Buecking, Sebastian
2008Dislocating NPs to the right: Anything goes? Semantic and pragmatic constraints. In Proceedings of SuB12, Atle Grønn (ed.), 32–46. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon & Horn, George
1976Remarks on ‘Conditions on Transformations’. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 265–299.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark
2003Lexical Categories. Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Chris
2012Quantificational binding does not require c-command. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 614–633. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barrenechea, Ana María
1973A propósito de la elipsis en la coordinación. In Studia Hispanica in Honorem R. Lapesa, Vol. II, 105–121. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Barros, Matthew
2014Sluicing and Identity in Ellipsis. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Barros, Matthew, Elliott, Patrick & Thoms, Gary
2014There is no island repair. Ms, Rutgers, UCL & University of Edinburgh.
Batllori, Montserrat & Hernanz, M. Lluïsa
2009Foco oracional y polaridad: En torno a una asimetría entre el español y el catalán. In Actas del VIII cogreso internacional de historia de la lengua española, Emilio Montero Cartelle (ed.), 2621–2636. Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
1998Inversion as focalization. Ms, University of Siena.
2001Inversion as focalization. In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, Aafke C. J. Hulk & J.-Yves Pollock (eds), 60–90. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP, The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Luigi Rizzi (ed.). Oxford: Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Belloro, Valeria A.
2015To the Right of the Verb: An Investigation of Clitic Doubling and Right Dislocation in Three Spanish Dialects. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola 2001The position of topic and focus in the left periphery. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 39–64. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Poletto, Cecilia
2004Topic, Focus and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Luigi Rizzi (ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Berruto, G.
1985Dislocazioni a sinistra e grammatica dell’italiano parlato. In Sintassi e morfologia della lingua italiana d’uso. Teoria e applicazioni descrittive, Annalisa Franchi de Bellis & Leonardo Maria Savoia (eds), 59–82. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Frascarelli, Mara
2010Is topic a root phenomenon? Iberia 2(1): 43–88.Google Scholar
Bleam, Tonia
1999Leísta Spanish and the Syntax of Clitic Doubling. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
Bocci, Giuliano
2013The Syntax-prosody Interface. A Cartographic Perspective with Evidence from Italian [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 204]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric
2003Islands and Chains: Resumption as Stranding [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 63]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Bare Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1958A theory of pitch accent in English. Word 14: 109–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonet, Eulàlia
1984Aproximació a l’entonació del català central. MA thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
1990Subjects in Catalan. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 13: 1–26.Google Scholar
Boone, Enrico
2015The Syntax and Licensing of Gapping and Fragments. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.
Borer, Hagit
1984Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko
2014Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 45(1): 27–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio & Gallego, Ángel
2014Reconsidering subextraction: Evidence from Spanish. Borealis 3: 223–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio & Picallo, Carme
1996Postnominal adjectives in Spanish DPs. Journal of Linguistics 32: 349–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brucart, José M.
1987La elisión sintáctica en español. Bellaterra: Publicacions de la UAB.Google Scholar
1999La elipsis. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua Española, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 2787–2863. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Brucart, José M., Gallego, Ángel & Fernández-Sánchez, Javier
2019Ellipsis (in Romance languages). Ms, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona/Uniwersytet Gdański.
Bruening, Benjamin
2009Selectional asymmetries between CP and DP suggest that the DP hypothesis is wrong. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 27–35.Google Scholar
2015Non-constituent coordination: Prosody, not movement. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 21(1): article 5.Google Scholar
Brunetti, Lisa
2003“Information” focus movement in Italian and contextual constraints on ellipsis. In WCCFL 22: Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Gina Garding & Mimu Tsujimura (eds), 95–108. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Buell, Leston 2008VP-internal DPs and right-dislocation in Zulu. In Linguistics in the Netherlands, Vol. 25, Marjo van Koppen & Bert Botma (eds), 37–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel
2003On D-trees, beans and B-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 511–545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel
1999Language, linear precedence and parentheticals. In The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 33–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Camacho, José
2002Wh-doubling: Implications for the syntax of wh movement. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 157–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003The coarse structure of the center periphery. Ms, Rutgers University.
Cardinaletti, Anna
2002Against optional and null clitics. Right dislocation vs. marginalization. Studia Linguistica 56: 29–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo
1999A comparative analysis of left and right dislocation in Romance. Studia Linguistica 53: 40–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Doubling structures and reconstruction. Probus 12(1): 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo & Chierchia, Gennaro
1999Reconstruction in dislocation constructions and the syntax/semantics interface. In WCCFL 17: The Proceedings of the Seventeenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Kinary N. Shahin, Susan Blake & Eun-Sook Kimpp (eds), 132–146. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo & Donati, Caterina
2015Please do not move that remnant too much! In Remnant Movement, Günther Grewendorf (ed.), 179–200. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
1976Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 27–55. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1977On wh-movement. In Formal Syntax, P. Culicover, T. Wasow, A. Akmajian (eds). New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1993A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–54. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honour of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Maria-Luisa Zubizarreta, Robert Freidin & Carlos Peregrín Otero (eds). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard
1977Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8(3): 425–504.Google Scholar
1993A minimalist program for linguistic theory. The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra 2005Sluicing and the lexicon: The point of no return. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Rebecca Cover & Yuni Kim (eds), 73–91. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
2013Syntactic identity in sluicing: How much and why. Linguistic Inquiry 44: 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chung, Sandra, Ladusaw, William & McCloskey, James
2011Sluicing(:) Between structure and inference. In Representing Language: Essays in Honor of Judith Aissen, Rodrigo Gutiérrez-Bravo, Line Mikkelsen & Eric Potsdam (eds), 31–50. San Diego CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1977The movement nature of left dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 397–412.Google Scholar
1983Topic constructions in some European languages and connectedness. In Connectedness in Sentence, Discourse and Text, Konrad Ehlich & Henk van Riemsijk (eds), 7–41. Tilburg: KUB.Google Scholar
1990Types of A-dependencies. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1993A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 239–297.Google Scholar
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi
2008The cartography of syntactic structures. In CISCL Working Papers on Language and Cognition, Vol.2, Vicenzo Moscati (ed.), 43–59. Siena: Università degli Studi di Siena.Google Scholar
Constantini, Francesco
2005On obviation in subjunctive clauses: The state of the art. Annali di CaFoscari 44(1-2): 97–132.Google Scholar
Coppock, Elizabeth
2001Gapping: In defense of deletion. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Mary Andronis (ed.), 133–147. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar
Crocco, Claudia
2013Is Italian clitic right dislocation grammaticalised? A prosodic analysis of YN-questions and statements. Lingua 133: 30–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio
2010Syntactic extraposition and clitic resumption in Italian. Lingua 120: 50–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray
2005Simpler Syntax. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Cat, Cécile
2002French Dislocation. PhD dissertation, University of York.
De Cat
(2007) French dislocation without movement, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 485–534. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Cat, Cécile
2007French Dislocation. Interpretation, Syntax, Acquisition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Delais-Roussaire, Elisabeth, Doetjes, Jenny & Sleeman, Petra
2004Dislocation. In Handbook of French Semantics, Francis Corblin & Henriëtte de Swart (eds), 505–530. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida
1991Resumptive Chains in Restrictive Relatives, Appositives and Dislocation Structures. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Depiante, Marcela
2000The Syntax of Deep and Surface Anaphora. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
2004Dos casos de elipsis con partícula de polaridad en español: Evidencia a favor de una visión no uniforme de la elipsis. Revista de la Sociedad Argentina de Lingüística 1: 53–69.Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel
2005A comment on the topic of topic-comment. Lingua 115: 691–710. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen 1990Clitic doubling, wh-movement and quantification in Romanian. Linguistic Inquiry 21(3): 351–397.Google Scholar
Döring, Sandra
2015Parentheticals are – presumably – CPs. In Parenthesis and Ellipsis, Marlies Kluck, Dennis Ott & Mark de Vries (eds), 109–145. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Downing, Laura J.
(2011) The prosody of dislocation in selected Bantu languages. Lingua 121: 722–786. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, Ineŝ & Figuereido-Silva, M. Cristina
2016The null subject parameter and the structure of the sentence in EP and BP. In The Handbook of Portuguese Linguistics, W. Leo Wetzels, João Costa & Sergio Menuzzi (eds), 234–253. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph
1976A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi
1997The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2007The architecture of topic and focus. In The Architecture of Focus, Valéria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds), 33–58. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Escobar, Linda
1995 Lefthand Satellites in Spanish. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
Espinal, Maria Teresa
1991The representation of disjunct constituents. Language 67: 726–762. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio
2016Complementizer phenomena in Spanish: Information structure and its syntactic manifestation. Borealis 5(2).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert
2006On pure syntax (uncontaminated by information structure). In A Festschrift Presented to Günther Grewendorf on Occasion of his 60th Birthday, Patrick Brandt & Eric Fuss (eds), 137–157. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feldhausen, Ingo
2008The Prosody-Syntax Interface in Catalan. PhD dissertation, University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
2010Sentential Form and Prosodic Structure of Catalan [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 168]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Lagunilla, Marina
1983El comportamiento de "un" con sustantivos y adjetivos en función de predicado nominal. Sobre el llamado "un" enfático. In Serta Philologica F. Lázaro Carreter, 195–208. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Fernández-Rubiera, Francisco J.
2014When phonology undergenerates: Evidence from Asturian enclitic structures. In Proceedings of the 40th Berkeley Linguistics Society, 85–101. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Fernández-Sánchez, Javier
2012The Syntax of PredNPs. MA thesis, University College London.
2013How left is right? Locating Romance CLRD. In XXIII Colloquium on Generative Grammar. Madrid.Google Scholar
2016Topics at the left edge of infinitive clauses in Spanish and Catalan. Borealis 5(2): 111–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Embedded gapping isn’t gapping. Ms, UAB/CLT.
2019Against a clausal ellipsis account of all stripping strings in Spanish. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 55(1): 53–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fiengo, Robert & May, Robert
1994Indices and Identity. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fortin, Catherine
2007Indonesian Sluicing and Verb Phrase Ellipsis: Description and Explanation in a Minimalist Framework. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
Fox, Danny 1999aFocus, parallelism and accomodation. In Proceedings of the 9th SALT, Tanya Matthews & Devon Strolovitch (eds), 70–90. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
1999bReconstruction, binding theory, and the interpretation of chains. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 157–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Danny & Lasnik, Howard
2003Successive-cyclic movement and island repair: The difference between sluicing and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 143–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Francesconi, Armando
2005La dislocación en la sintaxis italiana y española. Aspectos textuales y traductivos. Actas del XXIII AISPI (Associazione ispanisti italiani), 202–222.Google Scholar
Franks, Steven
2005What is “that”? Indiana University Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 33–62.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara
2000The Syntax-phonology Interface in Topic and Focus Constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Dislocation, clitic resumption and minimality. A comparative analysis or left and right topic constructions in Italian. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2002 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 256], Reineke Bok-Bennema, Bart Hollebrandse, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe & Petra Sleeman (eds), 99–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Dislocations and framings. In Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax, Andreas Dufter & Elizabeth Stark (eds), 472–501. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Roland
2007Types of topics in German and Italian. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form. Generalizations across Languages [Linguitstik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 100], Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds), 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Ramaglia, Francesca
2013(Pseudo)clefts at the syntax-prosody-discourse interface. In Cleft Structures [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 208] Katharina Hartmann & Tonjes Veenstra (eds), 97–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, Lyn & Clifton Jr, Charles
2005The syntax-discourse divide: Processing ellipsis. Syntax 8(2): 121–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Werner
2004Notes on the syntax and pragmatics of German left dislocation. In The Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery, Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds), 203–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina
2012El margen derecho del enunciado. Revista Española de Lingüística 42(2): 63–93.Google Scholar
Fukaya, T.
2007Sluicing and Stripping in Japanese and Some Implications. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
Gallego, Ángel
2009aDefective C-T in Romance. Probus 21: 163–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009bEllipsis by phase. Paper presented at the XIX CGG, EHU-UPV.Google Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana
1996Is there a FocusP and a TopicP in the noun phrase structure? University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 6(2): 105–128.Google Scholar
Gracanin-Yuksek, Martina
2007On Sharing. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1963Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther 2002Left dislocation as movement. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 2: 31–81.Google Scholar
Griffiths, James
2013Parenthetical verb constructions, fragment answers and constituent modification. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33(1): 191–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015On appositives. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
2019A Q-based approach to clausal ellipsis: Deriving the P-stranding and island sensitivity generalisations without movement. Glossa 4(1).Google Scholar
Griffiths, James & Lipták, Anikó
2014Contrast and island sensitivity in clausal ellipsis. Syntax 17(3): 189–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes K.
2000A movement approach to contrastive left dislocation. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 25: 3–65.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo
2002Structural Markedness and Syntactic Structure: A Study of Word Order and the Left Periphery in Mexican Spanish. PhD dissertation, University of California Santa Cruz.
Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier & González-Rivera, Melvin
2013Spanish PredNPs and the left periphery. In Selected Proceedings of the 16th HLS, Jennifer Cabrelli-Amaro (ed.), 1–14. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1991Parenthetical adverbial: The radical orphanage approach. In Aspects of Modern English: Papers Presented to Masatomo Ukaji on his 60th birthday, Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Norio Nawada, Osamu Koma & Takao Yagi (eds), 232–254. Tokyo: Kaitakushi.Google Scholar
2003Notes on long adverbial fronting in English. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 640–649. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua 116: 1651–1669. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Adverb Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena and the Composition of the Left Periphery. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert
2006Mittelfeld phenomena (Scrambling in Germanic). In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. 3, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 204–274. Malden MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1967Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3(2): 199–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian
2004Hallidays Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halpert, Claire
2012Argument Licensing and Agreement in Zulu. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Halpert, Claire & Zeller, Jochen
2013Right dislocation and raising-to-object in Zulu. Ms, University of Minnesota and University of KwaZulu-Natal.
Hankamer, Jorge
1973Unacceptable ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 17–68.Google Scholar
1979Deletion in Coordinate Structures. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Harizanov, Boris
2014Clitic doubling at the syntax-morphophonology interface: A-movement and morphological merger in Bulgarian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32(4): 1033–1088. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Katherina
2000Right Node Raising and Gapping. Interface Conditions on Prosodic Deletion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haugen, Jason D. 2008Morphology at the Interfaces. Reduplication and Noun Incorporation in Uto-Aztecan [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 117]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herburger, Elena
2000What Counts. Focus and Quantification. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hernanz, M. Lluïsa
2001En bonito lío me he metido! Notas sobre la afectividad en español. Moenia 7: 93–109.Google Scholar
2007aEmphatic polarity and C in Spanish. In Studies in Spanish Syntax, Laura Brugè (ed.), 105–150. Venezia: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
2007bFrom polarity to modality: Some (a)symmetries between bien and sí in Spanish. In Coreference, Modality and Focus, [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 111], Luis Eguren & Olga Fernández-Soriano (eds), 133–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hernanz, M. Lluïsa & Brucart, José M.
1987La sintaxis, 1: Principios teóricos. La oración simple. Barcelona: Crítica.Google Scholar
Hernanz, M. Lluïsa & Suñer, Avellina
1999La predicación no copulativa. Las construcciones absolutas. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua Española,Vol.2, Ch.39, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Herringa, Herman
2012A multidominance approach to appositional constructions. Lingua 122(6): 554–581. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2015Verb second. In Syntax: Theory and Analysis, Vol. 1, Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 324–383. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan & Thompson, Sandra
1973On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 465–497.Google Scholar
Huang, Cheng-Teh J.
1982Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Iatridou, Sabine
1995Clitics and island effects. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 2, Roumyana Izvorski & Victoria Tredinnick (eds), 11–30. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Irurtzun, Aritz
2007The grammar of focus at the interfaces. PhD dissertation, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU).
2009Why Y: On the centrality of syntax in the architecture of grammar. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 8: 141–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016On the nature and distribution of split wh-questions in Basque. Talk given at the Information Structure Workshop at the UAB, November.
Jackendoff, Ray
1971Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 21–35.Google Scholar
1972Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1997The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2002Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo
1982Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil
1990Incomplete VP deletion and gapping. Linguistic Analysis 20: 39–75.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L. & Miyagawa, Shigeru
2014A feature Inheritance approach to root phenomena and parametric variation. Lingua 145: 276–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Kyle 2006Gapping. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 407–435. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Gapping is not (VP-) ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 289–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Michael Allan
1993Sardinian Syntax. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kalbertodt, Janina, Primus, Beatrice & Schumacher, Petra
2015Punctuation, prosody and discourse: Afterthought vs. right dislocation. Frontiers in Psychology 6. Crossref. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1994The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2010Why there are no directionality parameters? In WCCFL 28: Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Mary Byram Washburn, Katherine McKinney-Bock, Erika Varis, Ann Sawyer & Barbara Tomaszewicz (eds), 2–23. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Kempchinsky, Paula
1986Romance Subjunctive Clauses and Logical Form. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
2009What can the subjunctive disjoint reference effect tell us about the subjunctive? Lingua 119(12): 1788–1810. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, Hiroko
2010A wh-in-situ strategy for sluicing. English Linguistics 27: 43–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kluck, Marlies
2014Who, me? Ellipsis in inquisitive fragment answers. Paper presented at the TINdag 2014.Google Scholar
Kluck, Marlies, Ott, Dennis & de Vries, Mark
(eds) 2015Parenthesis and Ellipsis: Crosslinguistic and Theoretical Perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kluck, Marlies & de Vries, Mark
2013Cumulative rightward processes. In Rightward Movement in a Comparative Perspective [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 200], Gert Webelhuth, Manfred Sailer & Heike Walker (eds), 281–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kölbel, Max
2003Faultless disagreement. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104: 53–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jan. 1978Why subject sentences don’t exist. In Recent Transformational Studies in European Languages, Samuel J. Keyser (ed.), 53–64. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jan. 2000Extraposition as parallel construal. Ms, University of Groningen.
Kramer, Ruth
2014Clitic doubling or object agreement: The view from Amharic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32: 593–634. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred & Féry, Caroline
2008Information structure. Notional distinctions, ways of expression. In Unity and Diversity of Languages, Piet van Sterkenburg (ed.), 123–136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1978Danwa-no Bunpoo. Tokyo: Taishuukan.Google Scholar
Ladd, Robert D.
1996Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1981Topic, Antitopic and Verb Agreement in Non-standard French [Pragmatics & Beyond II:6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, Eva
1979La dislocation en français. Étude de syntaxe générative. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard 2001When can you save a structure by destroying it? In Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 31, Vol.2, Minjoo Kim & Uri Strauss (eds), 301–320. Amherst MA: GSLA.Google Scholar
2013Multiple sluicing in English? Syntax 17(1): 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, Howard & Stowell, Tim
1991Weakest crossover. Linguistic Inquiry 22(4): 687–720.Google Scholar
Laurens, Frédéric
2008French predicative verbless utterances. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Stefan Muller (ed.), 152–172. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Lebeaux, David
1988Language Acquisition and the Form of Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Lechner, Winfried
2004Ellipsis in Comparatives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Jeong-Shik
2009A verb initial single clause analysis of right dislocated constructions in Korean. Studies in Modern Grammar 57: 127–157.Google Scholar
Leonetti, Manuel & Escandell, Victoria
2009Fronting and verum focus in Spanish. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 112], Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds), 155–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leung, Tommi
2014The preposition stranding generalization and conditions on sluicing: Evidence from Emirati Arabic. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 332–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Mark & Pierrehumbert, Janet
1984Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In Language Sound Structure, Mark Aronoff & Richard T. Oehrle (eds), 157–233. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Vivian
2002Coordination and sharing at the interfaces. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Lobeck, Anne
1995Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing and Identification. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
López, Luis
1999VP-ellipsis in English and Spanish and the features of auxiliaries. Probus 11(2): 263–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Dislocations. In The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 402–421. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Luján, Marta
1999A unified approach to control and obviation. In Grammatical Analyses in Basque and Romance Linguistics. Papers in Honor of Mario Saltarelli . [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 187], Jon A. Franco, Alazne Landa & Juan Martín, 104–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, Rita
1994Syntactic dependencies and their properties: A note on strong islands. Ms, University College London.
Mayol, Laya
2007Right dislocation in Catalan. Languages in Contrast 7(2): 203–219.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James
1982Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 91–106.Google Scholar
1990Resumptive pronouns, A-bar binding and levels of representation in Irish. In Syntax of the Modern Celtic Languages, Randall Hendrick (ed.), 199–248. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James 2006Resumption. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. IV, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 94–117. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, Jason
2001The Syntax of Silence. Oxford: Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004aFragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 661–738. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004bResumptivity and non-movement. Studies in Greek Linguistics 24: 471–481.Google Scholar
2005Revisiting syntactic identity conditions. Handout given at the Workshop on ellipsis, University of California, Berkeley.
2010Three kinds of ellipsis. In Context-dependence, Perspective and Relativity, Francois Recanati, Isidora Stojanovic & Neftali Villanueva (eds), 141–192. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Morgan, Jerry
1973Sentence fragments and the notion of ’sentence’. In Issues in Linguistics: Essays in Honour of Henry and Renée Kahane, Braj Kachru (ed.), 719–751. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Morimoto, Yukiko
2002Prominence mismatches and differential object marking in Bantu. In Proceedings of the LFG 02 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds), 292–314. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Murphy, Andrew
2016Subset relations in ellipsis licensing. Glossa. A Journal of General Linguistics 1(1): 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Szendröi, Kriszta
2004Superman sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 35, 149–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Vermeulen, Reiko
(eds) 2012The Syntax of Topic, Focus and Contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neijt, Anneke
1979Gapping: A Contribution to Sentence Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene
1986Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew
2011Multiple agree with clitics: Person complementarity vs omnivorous number. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29: 939–971. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nishigauchi, Taisuke
1998Multiple sluicing in Japanese and the functional nature of wh-phrases. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7: 121–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nykiel, Joanna
2013Clefts and preposition omission in sluicing. Lingua 123: 74–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Preposition stranding and ellipsis alternation. English Language and Linguistics 21: 127–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco
1997Word Order and Clause Structure in Spanish and other Romance Languages. PhD dissertation, CUNY Graduate Center, New York.
1998Postverbal asymmetries in Spanish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16: 313–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco & Treviño, Esthela
1999Left dislocated subjects and the pro-drop parameter: A case study of Spanish. Lingua 107: 39–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ormazábal, Javier & Romero, Juan
2011Object clitics and agreement. Ms, University of the Basque Country, University of Extremadura.
Ortega-Santos, Iván 2016Focus-related Operations at the Right Edge in Spanish: Subjects and Ellipsis [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega-Santos, Iván, Yoshida, Masaya & Nakao, Chizuru
2014On ellipsis structures involving a wh-remnant and a non-wh-remnant simultaneously. Lingua 138: 55–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ott, Dennis
2008Notes on noun ph(r)ases. Ms, Harvard University.
2012Movement and ellipsis in contrastive left-dislocation. In WCCFL 30: Proceedings of the 30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Nathan Arnett & Ryan Bennet (eds), 281–291. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
2015Connectivity in left-dislocation and the composition of the left periphery. Linguistic Variation 15(2): 225–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ott, Dennis & de Vries, Mark
2012Thinking in the right direction: An ellipsis analysis of right-dislocation. Linguistics in the Netherlands 29: 123–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Right dislocation as deletion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34(2): 641–690. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ott, Dennis & Struckmeier, Volker
2016Deletion in clausal ellipsis: Remnants in the middle field. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Penn Linguistics Conference 22: 225–234.Google Scholar
Padilla, Xavier
2001El orden de palabras en el español coloquial. València: Publicaciones Universitat de València.Google Scholar
Park, Myung-Kwan & Kim, Sun-Woong
2009The syntax of afterthoughts in Korean: Move and Delete. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal 17: 25–53.Google Scholar
Paul, Ileana
2006Great coffee, that Maxwell House. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Paul, Ileana & Stainton, Robert
2006Really Intriguing, that Pred NP! Philosophy Publications, paper 24.Google Scholar
Pérez Bello, G.
1998Uso de las dislocaciones a la derecha y a la izquierda en castellano e italiano. Interlingüística 9: 253–259.Google Scholar
Philippova, Tatiana
2014P-omission under sluicing, P-clitic and the nature of P-stranding. In Proceedings of ConSOLE XXII, Martin Kohlberg, Kate Bellamy & Eleanor Dutton (eds), 133–155. Leiden: Leiden University.Google Scholar
Picallo, Carme
1985Opaque Domains. PhD dissertation, CUNY.
Planas-Morales, Sílvia & Villalba, Xavier
2013The right periphery of interrogatives in Catalan and Spanish: Syntax/prosody interactions. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 12: 193–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia & Pollock, Jean-Yves
2004On the left periphery of some Romance wh-questions. In The Structure of CP and IP, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 251–296. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Preminger, Omar
2009Breaking agreements: Distinguishing agreement and clitic doubling by their failures. Linguistic Inquiry 40(4): 619–666. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prieto, Pilar
2002Entonació. In Gramàtica del català contemporani, Joan Solà, M. Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró & Manuel Pérez Saldanya (eds), 393–462. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen
1984Topicalization and left dislocation: A functional analysis. In Discourses in Reading and Linguistics, Sheila White & Virginia Teller (eds), 213–225. New York NY: Anyas.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik Jan. 1972A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Jan. 1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Reich, Ingo
2006Toward a uniform analysis of short answers and gapping. In Proceedings of the 2004 Texas Linguistics Society Conference, Pascal Denis (ed.), 69–78. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1981Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27: 53–93.Google Scholar
Rezac, Milan
2008Phi-agree and theta-related case. In Phi Theory, Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds), 83–129. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rivero, Maria L.
1980On left dislocation and topicalization in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 363–393.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1982Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1986Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17(3): 501–557.Google Scholar
1990Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Relativized minimality effects. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Mark Baltin & Chris Collins. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Locality and left periphery. In The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Structures and Beyond, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Bocci, Giuliano
2016The left periphery of the clause – primarily illustrated for Italian. Ms, to appear in Blackwell Companion to Syntax,2nd edn.Google Scholar
Roca, Francesc
1999La determinación y la modificación nominal en español. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Rodman, Robert
1974On left dislocation. Papers in Linguistics 7: 437–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, Cilene, Nevins, Andrew & Vicente, Luis
2009Cleaving the interaction between sluicing and P-stranding. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2006: Selected Papers from “Going Romance” [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 303], Danièle Torck & W. Leo Wetzels (eds), 175–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, Cilene & Saab, Andrés
2018The limits of pseudo-sluicing. Paper presented at the VIII Encuentro de Gramática Generativa, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats
1992A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert
1967Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
1969Guess who? In Papers from the 5th RegionalMeeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Robert Binnick et al.. (eds), 252–286. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar
1970Gapping and the order of constituents. In Progress in Linguistics, Manfred Bierwisch & Karl Heidolph (eds), 249–259. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Rossi, M.
1999L’intonation. Le système du français: description et modélisation. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Rubio, Carlos
2014Syntactic Constraints on Topicalization Phenomena. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
Sæbø, Kjell J. 1997Topic, focus and quantifier raising. In Proceedings of the 11th Amsterdam Colloquium, Paul Dekker & Michael Franke (eds), 67–72. Amsterdam: ILLC.Google Scholar
2009Judgement ascriptions. Linguistics and Philosophy 32: 327–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sailor, Craig & Schütze, Carson T.
2014Is there repair by ellipsis? Ms, University of Groningen and UCLA.
Sailor, Craig & Thoms, Gary
2014On the non existence of non constituent coordination and non constituent ellipsis. In WCCFL 31: Proceedings of the 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Robert E. Santana-LaBarge (ed.), 361–370. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri
2006When right dislocation meets the left periphery. Lingua 116: 687–755. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Information structure in Italian clauses. Talk given at the Information Structure Workshop, UCL, November.
2009Topic, focus and background in Italian clauses. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 112], Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jakob (eds), 359–362. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015The Interaction of Focus and Givenness. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Ana Lucía
2009The problem of fragment answers. Iberia 1(1): 115–142.Google Scholar
Sato, Yosuke
2011P-stranding under sluicing and repair by ellipsis: Why is Indonesian (not) special? Journal of East Asian Linguistics 20: 339–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Paul
1977Constraints on coordination. Language 53: 86–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Stefan
2007Reduced Parenthetical Clauses as Mitigators [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 27]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzschild, Roger
1999GIVENness, AvoidF and other constraints in the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics 7: 141–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sedano, Mercedes
2012Dislocación a la izquierda y a la derecha: Semejanzas y diferencias. In Cum corde et in nova grammatica: Estudios ofrecidos a Guillermo Rojo, Tomás Jiménez-Juliá et al.. (eds), 791–805. Santiago de Compostela: Servizio de Publicacións da Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
2013Dislocación a la izquierda y derecha en España y Latinoamérica. Lingüística 29(2): 153–190.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth
1978On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. In Nordic Prosody, Torsten Fretheim (ed.), 128–149. Trondheim: TAPIR.Google Scholar
1984Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995The prosodic structure of function words. In Papers in Optimality Theory, Vol. 18, Jill N. Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey & Suzanne C. Urbanczyk (eds). Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
2011The syntax-phonology interface. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, John A. Goldsmith & Alan C. L. Yu (eds). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shaer, Benjamin 2009German and English left-peripheral elements and the ‘orphan’ analysis of non-integration. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse, Syntactic, Semantic and Pragmatic Perspectives, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 366–397. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shaer, Benjamin, Cook, Philippa, Frey, Werner & Maienborn, Claudia
(eds) 2009Dislocated Elements in Discourse. Syntactic, Semantic and Pragmatic Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shaer, Benjamin & Frey, Werner
2003Integrated and non-integrated left peripheral elements in German and English. In Proceedings of the Dislocated Elements Workshop, Benjamin Shaer, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn, 435–484. Berlin: ZAS.Google Scholar
Shimoyama, Junko, Drummond, Alex, Schwarz, Bernhard & Wagner, Michael
2015Movement and ellipsis in afterthought right dislocation, sluicing and fragments. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistics Association. Ottawa: CLA.Google Scholar
Shopen, T.
1972A Generative Theory of Ellipsis. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
Sportiche, Dominique
2006Reconstruction, binding, and scope. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. IV, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 35–93. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stainton, Robert
2006Words and Thoughts: Subsentences, Ellipsis and the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert
1974Pragmatic presuppositions. In Semantics and Philosophy, Milton K. Munitz & Peter K. Unger (eds), 197–214. New York NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Stepanov, A.
2001Cyclic Domains in Syntactic Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Stigliano, Laura
2018Revisiting the interaction between P-stranding and clausal ellipsis in Spanish. Ms, The University of Chicago.
Stowell, Tim
1981Origins of Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Stoyanova, Marina
2008Unique Focus: Languages without Multiple Wh-questions [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 123]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suñer, Margarita
1988The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6: 391–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szczegielniak, Adam
2008Islands in sluicing in Polish. In Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Natasha Abner & Jason Bishop (eds), 404–412. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Shiochi & Husley, Sarah
2009Wholesale late merger: Beyond the A/A’-distinction. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 387–426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Takita, Kensuke
2012Pseudo-right dislocation and the bare-topic construction in Japanese. Nauzan Linguistics 8: 147–171.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Hidekazu
2001Right-dislocation as scrambling. Journal of Linguistics 37: 551–579. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tancredi, Christopher
1992Deletion, Deaccenting and Presupposition. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Temmerman, Tanja
2013The syntax of Dutch embedded fragment answers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31(1): 235–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thoms, Gary
2010Verb floating and VP-ellipsis: Towards a movement account of ellipsis licensing. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 10: 252–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur
2007The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, Russell S.
1986Basic Word Order. Functional Principles. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Toosarvandani, Maziar. To appear. Embedding the antecedent in gapping: Low coordination and the role of parallelism. Linguistic Inquiry.
Torrego, Esther
1998Pronouns and determiners: A DP analysis of Spanish nominals. University of Massachusetts, Boston.
Torrence, Harold
2005On the Distribution of Complementizers in Wolof. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
2013The Clause Structure of Wolof: Insights into the Left Periphery [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 198]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert
1995Phonological Phrases: Their Relation to Syntax, Focus and Prominence. PhD dissertation, MIT.
1999On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 219–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006The syntax-phonology interface. In The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, Paul de Lacy (ed.), 435–456. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2013Some distinctions in the German Nachfeld. Ms, ZAS Berlin.
2015Intonation phrases and speech acts. In Parenthesis and Ellipsis. Crosslinguistic and Theoretical Perspectives, Marlies Kluck, Dennis Ott & Mark de Vries (eds), 301–349. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2016Some distinctions in the right periphery of the German clause. In: Innersentential Propositional Proforms. Syntactic Properties and Interpretative Effects [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 232], Werner Frey, André Meinunger & Kerstin Schwabe (eds), 105–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Umbach, Carla
2016Evaluative propositions and subjective judgements. In Subjective Meaning, Cécile Meier & Janneke van Wijnbergen-Huitink (eds), 127–168. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan
1995Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 79–123.Google Scholar
Vallduví, Enric
1992The Informational Component. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Valmala, Vidal
2007The syntax of little things. Ms, UPV/EHU.
2014Island repair by ellipsis: Handle with care. In XI Workshop on Syntax, Semantics and Phonology, 5–6 June, Barcelona.Google Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen
(ed.) 2009Alternatives to Cartography. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Merchant
(eds) 2013Ellipsis phenomena. In Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax, Marcel den Dikken (ed.), 701–745. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jan. 1981Left dislocation, connectedness and reconstruction. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 20: 80–103.Google Scholar
Vicente, Luis
2008Syntactic isomorphism and non-isomorphism under ellipsis. Ms, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Villalba, Xavier
1996Sobre la dislocació a la dreta. Llengua i Literatura 7: 209–234.Google Scholar
1998Right dislocation is not right dislocation. In Studies on the Syntax of Central Romance Languages, Olga Fultana & Fransesc Roca (eds), 227–241. Girona: University of Girona.Google Scholar
1999Nihil est in LF quod prius non fuerit in SS. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 239–252.Google Scholar
Villalba, Xavier 2000The Syntax of the Sentence Periphery. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
2007La dislocació a la dreta en català i castellà: Microvariació en la intefície sintaxi/pragmàtica. Caplletra 42: 273–302.Google Scholar
Villalba, Xavier & Bartra-Kauffman, Anna
2009Predicate focus fronting in the Spanish determiner phrase. Lingua 120(4): 819–849. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vinet, Marie-Thérèse
1991French non-verbal exclamative constructions. Probus 3: 77–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Mark
2009Specifying coordination: An investigation into the syntax of dislocation, extraposition and parenthesis. In Language and Linguistics: Emerging Trends, Cynthia R. Dreyer (ed.), 37–98. New York NY: Nova.Google Scholar
2013aLocality and right-dislocation. Linguistics in the Netherlands 30: 160–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Invisible constituents? Parentheses as B-merged adverbial phrases. In Parentheticals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106], Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds), 203–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012aUnconventional mergers. In Ways of Structure Building, Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria & Vidal Valmala (eds), 143–166. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012bParenthetical main clauses – or not? On appositives and quasi-relatives. In Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 190], Lobke Aelbrecht, Lliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 177–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002The Syntax of Relativization. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
2013bMultidominance and locality. Lingua 134: 149–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Arthur
2007Sluicing and resumption. In NELS 37: Proceedings of the Thirty-seventh Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Weir, Andrew
2012Left-edge deletion in English and subject omission in diaries. English Language and Linguistics 16: 105–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Fragments and Clausal Ellipsis. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Wells, John C.
2006English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Whitman, John
2000Right dislocation in English and Japanese. In Syntactic and Functional Explorations in Honor of Susumu Kuno, Kenichi Takami, Akio Kamio & John Whitman (eds), 445–470. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Wilder, Chris
1995Some properties of ellipsis in coordination. In Studies on Universal Grammar and Typological Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 13]. Artemis Alexiadou & Tracy Alan Hall (eds), 59–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1978Across the board rule application. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 31–43.Google Scholar
Winkler, Susanne
2005Ellipsis and Focus in Generative Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi
2017Stripping and topless complements. Linguistic Inquiry 48(2): 341–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zagiu, Rodica
2013Information structure. In The grammar of Romanian,Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.), 568–574. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Zeller, Jochen 2012Object marking in Zulu. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 30(2): 219–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zerbian, Sabine
2007Phonological phrasing in Northern Sotho (Bantu). The Linguistic Review 24: 233–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa
1994Grammatical representation of topic and focus: Implications for the structure of the clause. Cuadernos de Lingüística 2: 181–208.Google Scholar
1998Prosody, Focus and Word Order. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zwart, Jan-Wouter
2001Backgrounding (right-dislocation) in Dutch. Ms, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
2011The Syntax of Dutch. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Fernández‐Sánchez, Javier & Dennis Ott
2020. Dislocations. Language and Linguistics Compass 14:9 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009060 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Syntax
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2019044651 | Marc record