Syntactic and Semantic Variation in Copular Sentences
Insights from Classical Hebrew
This book presents a novel account of syntactic and semantic variation in copular and existential sentences in Classical Hebrew. Like many languages, the system of Classical Hebrew copular sentences is quite complex, containing zero, pronominal, and verbal forms as well as eventive and inchoative semantics. Approaching this subject from the framework of Distributed Morphology provides an elegant and comprehensive explanation for both the syntactic and semantic variation in these sentences. This book also presents a theoretical model for analyzing copular sentences in other languages included related phenomena– such as pseudo-copulas. It is also a demonstration of what can be gained by applying modern linguistic analyses to dead languages. Citing and building off previous studies on this topic, this book will be of interest to those interested in the theoretical examination of copular and existential sentences and to those interested in Classical Hebrew more specifically.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 261] 2020. xvi, 159 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
Table of Contents
A note on Hebrew transcription
Syntactic and semantic variation in copular sentences: Insights from Classical Hebrew
Chapter 1. Introduction
Chapter 2. Non-verbal predication in cross-linguistic and theoretical perspective
Chapter 3. Non-verbal predication in Classical Hebrew
Chapter 4. A theory of syntactic and semantic variation in copular sentences with insights from the system of Classical Hebrew
Chapter 5. The copula in the left-periphery
Chapter 6. Existentials in Classical Hebrew
Chapter 7. Conclusions and a way forward for analyzing copular and existential sentences
Adger, D. and Smith, J.
Andersen, F. I.
Arregi, K. and Nevins, A.
Baker, M. C.
Baker, M. & Croft, W.
Balazs, J. and Bowers, J.
Barwise, J. & Cooper, R.
Bentley, D. Ciconte, F. M. & Cruschina, S.
Benton, R. C.
Bjorkman, B. A. M.
Bjorkman, B. & Zeijlstra, H.
2014 Upward Agree is superior. Ms., Toronto, Ontario & Göttingen: University of Toronto & Georg-August-Universität Göttingen. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/002350/current.pdf> (21 February 2020).
Boulet, J. E.
Cook, J. A.
Cowper, E. & DeCaen, V.
2017 Biblical Hebrew: A formal perspective on the left periphery. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 38. http://twpl.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/twpl/article/view/28212> (25 November 2018).
2008 The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/
den Dikken, M.
Eide, K. M. & Åfarli, T. A.
Embick, D. and Noyer, R.
Escandell-Vidal, M. V.
Fakih, A. H. A.
Gast, V. & Haas, F.
Gumiel-Molina, S. & Pérez-Jiménez, I.
2000 Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In Research in Afroasiatic Grammar. Papers from the Third Conference on Afroasiatic Languages, Sophia Antipolis, 1996 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 202; Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Series 4], J. Lecarme, J. Lowenstamm & U. Shlonsky (eds), 125–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Halle, M. & Marantz, A.
Harmelink, Brian L.
Holmstedt, R. D.
2011 The Biblical Hebrew pronoun as a copula. http://ancienthebrewgrammar.wordpress.com/2011/02/27/hebrew-pronominal-copula/> (25 October 2012).
Holmstedt, R. & Jones, A.
1998 ‘Aberrant’usages of introductory wǝhāyā in the light of text linguistics. In K-D Schunck and M. Augustin (eds.) Lasset uns Brücken bauen...: collected communications to the XVth Congress of the International organization for the study of the Old Testament, Cambridge 1995. 9-25. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang
Joüon, P. & Muraoka, T.
Kuroda, S. Y.
Levin, B. & Rappaport Hovav, M.
Longacre, D. G.
2014 Navigation points in text: Methodological and linguistic preliminaries for the study of the semantic, syntactic, and discourse-pragmatic functions of ויהי in Biblical Hebrew narrative. In Grappling with the Chronology of the Genesis Flood, S. Boyd & A. Snelling (eds), 639–704. Green Forest AR: Master Books.
Macías, J. H. G.
Marín, R. & McNally, L.
Markman, V. G.
Miller, C. L.
Murray, S. E.
2009 A Hamblin semantics for evidentials. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 19: 324–341. http://www.semanticsarchive.net/Archive/2I5ZjdmY/> (21 February 2020).
2010 Evidentiality and the Structure of Speech Acts. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University. http://www.semanticsarchive.net/Archive/WViOGQxY/> (21 February 2020).
Naudé, J.A., Miller-Naudé, C.L. and Wilson, D.J.
Naudé, J. A.
Naudé, J. A. & Miller-Naudé, C. L.
2016 The contribution of Qumran to Historical Hebrew linguistics: Evidence from the syntax of participial negation. HTS Teologiese Studies 72(4). https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/3150/6985> (22 February 2020)
Naudé, J. A. Miller-Naudé, C. L. & Wilson, D. J.
Nevins, A. & Parrott, J. K.
Partee, B. H. & Borschev, V.
Preminger, O. & Polinsky, M.
Rapoport, T. R.
Seidel, G. J.
van der Merwe, C. H.
van Gelderen, Elly
van Hecke, P.
Waltke, B. K. & O’Connor, M.
Wilson, D. J.
Forthcoming. The thetic/categorical distinction as difference in common ground update: with application to Biblical Hebrew. In Information Structure: The Cross-linguistic Architecture of Thetics and Categoricals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wondem, M. A.
2009 The tripartite nominal clause in Biblical Hebrew: An analysis of extraposition with verbless clauses. GIALens 3(1). http://www.gial.edu/GIALend/issues.htm> (6 February 2012).
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009060 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Syntax