Scientific Methods for the Humanities

| University of Munich
| University of Utrecht
| Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027233479 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
PaperbackAvailable
ISBN 9789027233486 | EUR 36.00 | USD 54.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027274670 | EUR 99.00/36.00*
| USD 149.00/54.00*
 
Here is a much needed introductory textbook on empirical research methods for the Humanities. Especially aimed at students and scholars of Literature, Applied Linguistics, and Film and Media, it stimulates readers to reflect on the problems and possibilities of testing the empirical assumptions and offers hands-on learning opportunities to develop empirical studies. It explains a wide range of methods, from interviews to observation research, and guides readers through the choices researchers have to make. It discusses the essence of experiments, illustrates how studies are designed, how to develop questionnaires, and helps readers to collect and analyze data by themselves. The book presents qualitative approaches to research but focuses mostly on quantitative methods, detailing the workings of basic statistics. At the end, the book also shows how to give papers at international conferences, how to draft a report, and what is involved in the preparation of a publishable article.
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 13]  2012.  xxii, 328 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
List of Figures, Tables and Graphs
xiii–xviii
Acknowledgements
xix
Foreword
xx–xxii
Chapter 1. A new beginning
1–22
Interlude. Some misconceptions about scientific and empirical research of culture
23–30
Chapter 2. Basic insights from the philosophy of science
31–52
Chapter 3. Research methodology and design
53–68
Chapter 4. Methods of data collection
69–98
Chapter 5. How to construct a questionnaire
99–122
Chapter 6. Experiment
123–147
Chapter 7. How to enter and manipulate data in SPSS
148–167
Chapter 8. Descriptive statistics
168–198
Chapter 9. Inference statistics: Preliminaries
199–224
Chapter 10. Inference statistics: Test Selection, t-test and non-parametric equivalents
225–245
Chapter 11. Inference statistics: ANOVA
246–274
Chapter 12. Communicating results
275–309
Epilogue
310–316
Bibliography
317–320
Notes on contributors
321–322
Author index
323–324
Subject index
325–328
“The idea that there is an impenetrable divide between science and the arts is happily dying. In its place the authors have written this valuable book, which is equally open to scientists and artists. It shows how empirical methods can be used not just to analyze, but to illuminate works of literature and the other arts. Wonderfully thoughtful and helpfully instructive, this will become the preferred book for everyone who wants to approach the arts in a spirit of inquiry.”
“A breath of fresh, crisp air and a model of modesty. This book does not invite students and their teachers into an elite school of impressive obscurities. Instead, through clear language, patient explanation, vivid analogies, accessible examples and the steady development of skills, it empowers anyone who wants to learn how to investigate cultural and especially literary matters in scientific ways. Enough of the fug of endless circular discussion: time for the invigorating breeze of honest inquiry along new trails of step-by-step discovery.”
“This book is an important and all-encompassing resource for encouraging not only students, but also our colleagues, to see the humanities and the methods used in the sciences as complementary rather than in opposition.”
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2014.  In Creative Confluence [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 16], Crossref logo
No author info given
2018.  In Cognitive Rhetoric [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 31], Crossref logo
No author info given
2021.  In Style and Reader Response [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 36], Crossref logo
No author info given
2021.  In Style and Reader Response [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 36], Crossref logo
Bruhn, Mark J.
2018. Citation analysis. Scientific Study of Literature 8:1  pp. 77 ff. Crossref logo
Castiglione, Davide
2017. Difficult poetry processing: Reading times and the narrativity hypothesis. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:2  pp. 99 ff. Crossref logo
Castiglione, Davide
2019.  In Difficulty in Poetry,  pp. 65 ff. Crossref logo
Castiglione, Davide
2019.  In Difficulty in Poetry,  pp. 169 ff. Crossref logo
Chesnokova, Anna & Willie van Peer
2020.  In Znaki czy nie znaki? Tom 3. Struktura i semantyka utworów lirycznych, Crossref logo
Da Sylva, Lyne
2018. Towards linked data: Some consequences for researchers in the social sciences and humanities. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 55:1  pp. 94 ff. Crossref logo
Fogal, Gary G
2015. Pedagogical stylistics in multiple foreign language and second language contexts: A synthesis of empirical research. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 24:1  pp. 54 ff. Crossref logo
Hakemulder, Frank, Olivia Fialho & Matthijs P. Bal
2016.  In Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 24],  pp. 19 ff. Crossref logo
Herrero-Zorita, Carlos
2013. A Statistical Study of the Usage of No-Negation and Not-Negation in Spoken Academic English. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 95  pp. 482 ff. Crossref logo
Jang, JooYoung & Bo Feng
2018. The Effects of Gain- and Loss-Framed Advice Messages on Recipients’ Responses to Advice. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 37:2  pp. 181 ff. Crossref logo
Kuzmičová, Anežka & Katalin Bálint
2019. Personal Relevance in Story Reading. Poetics Today 40:3  pp. 429 ff. Crossref logo
Liu, Shisheng, Zhijun Zhang & Cuiling Zhang
2016.  In Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 24],  pp. 125 ff. Crossref logo
McIntyre, Dan
2013. The year’s work in stylistics 2012. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 22:4  pp. 333 ff. Crossref logo
Peer, Willie & Anna Chesnokova
2019. What literature does to our emotions, and how do we know? Empirical studies will tell. Synopsis: Text, Context, Media :1(25) Crossref logo
Sklar, Howard
2017.  In The Palgrave Handbook of Affect Studies and Textual Criticism,  pp. 451 ff. Crossref logo
Velikovsky, J. T.
2016.  In Creative Technologies for Multidisciplinary Applications [Advances in Media, Entertainment, and the Arts, ],  pp. 208 ff. Crossref logo
Velikovsky, J. T.
2018.  In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Fourth Edition,  pp. 4666 ff. Crossref logo
Velikovsky, J. T.
2018.  In Technology Adoption and Social Issues,  pp. 1590 ff. Crossref logo
Velikovsky, J. T.
2019.  In Advanced Methodologies and Technologies in Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation, and Human-Computer Interaction [Advances in Computer and Electrical Engineering, ],  pp. 795 ff. Crossref logo
Zyngier, Sonia & Vander Viana
2016.  In Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 24],  pp. 271 ff. Crossref logo
Марущак, Н. А.
2019. NARRATIVE PERSPECTIVE IN EDGAR POЕ’S POETICS: A LINGUISTIC ASPECT. Studia Philologica :12  pp. 84 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 october 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

Bibliography

Aaftink, C.
2004Pivotal reading: Reading related to pivotal life experiences. Utrecht University: Unpublished M.A. thesis.Google Scholar
American Psychological Association
(1994) Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, 4th (ed.) Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Andringa, E.
1986Perspektivierung und Perspektivenübernahme: Zur Wahrnehmung literarischer Figuren. Spiel, 5, 135–146.Google Scholar
Bailey, K. M.
1990The use of diary studies in teacher education programs. In J. C. Richards & D. Nunan (Eds), Second language teacher education (pp. 215–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, R. & Wright, H.
1955Midwest and its children. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Bales, R. & Cohen, S.
1979SYMLOG: A system for multiple level observation of groups. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bandura, A., Ross, D. & Ross, S. A.
1963Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 3–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barros, H. S.
2003Desfamiliarização ou Preferência? O Estranhamento na Cidade de Deus. Caderno de Letras 20, 121–127.Google Scholar
Bechtel, R.
1967Hodometer research in museums. Museum News, March, 23–5.Google Scholar
Bechtel, R. B. & Zeisel, J.
1987Observation: The world under a glass. In R. B. Bechtel, R. W. Marans & W. M. Michelson (Eds.), Methods in environmental and behavioral research (pp. 11–40). New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Berlyne, D. E.
1971Aesthetics and Psychobiology. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Birdwhistell, R.
1970Kinesics in context: Essays on body motion communication. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Bourg, T., Risden, K., Thompson, S. & Davis, E. C.
1993The effects of an empathy-building strategy on 6th graders’ causal inferencing in narrative text comprehension. Poetics, 22, 117–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bower, G. H.
1978Experiments on story comprehension and recall. Discourse Processes, 1, 211–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brace, N., Kemp, R. & Snelgar, R.
2003SPSS for Psychologists; A guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. New York, NY: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Bronowski, J.
1976The Ascent of Man. London: BBC.Google Scholar
Cantor, J., Ziemke, D. & Sparks, G.
1984The effect of forewarning on emotional responses to a horror film. Journal of Broadcasting, 28, 21–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carp, F. M. & Carp, A.
1981The validity, reliability and generalizability of diary data. Experimental Aging Research, 7, 281–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, F. G. & Schrober, M. F.
2000Clarifying question meaning in a household telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(1), 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Th. & Campbell, D. T.
1979Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Cousins, N.
1985Anatomy of an illness as perceived by the patient: Reflections on healing and regeneration. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Davis, S. & Andringa, E.
1995Narrrative structure and emotional response. In G. Rusch (Ed.), Empirical approaches to literature (pp. 50–60). Siegen: Lumis.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R.
2006The God delusion. London: Random House.Google Scholar
Denscombe, M.
2010The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Descartes, R.
1637 [2006]A discourse on the method. New York, NY: Oxford University Press 2006.Google Scholar
Dilthey, W.
1985Poetry and experience. Selected works, vol. V. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
1994The hermeneutics of the human sciences. In K. Mueller-Vollmer (Ed.), The hermeneutics reader: texts of the German tradition from the enlightenment to the present. New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Earthman, E. A.
1992Creating the virtual work: Readers’ processes in understanding literary texts. Research in the Teaching of English, 26, 351–384.Google Scholar
Field, A.
2005Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Flerx, V. C., Filder, D. S. & Rogers, R. W.
1976Sex role stereotypes: Developmental aspects and early intervention. Child Development, 47, 998–1007. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flower, L. S. & Hayes, J. R.
1981A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Freud, S.
1975The psychopathology of everyday life. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Transl.). The Pelican Freud Library, vol. 5, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
1979On psychopathology. In J. Strachey (Ed, & Transl.). The Pelican Freud Library, vol. 10, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
1984On metapsychology: The theory of psychoanalysis. In J. Strachey (Ed, & Transl.). The Pelican Freud Library, vol. 11, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Frost, W.
1969The development of a technique for TV programme assessment. Journal of the Market Research Society, 11, 25–44.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. G.
1975Truth and method. New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J. & Prentice, D. A.
1991The representation of fictional information. Psychological Science, 2¸ 336–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, A.
(n.d.). Focus Groups. Retrieved December 28, 2004, (http://​www​.soc​.surrey​.ac​.uk​/sru​/SRU19​.html).
Gibson, R., Aust, C. F. & Zillmann, D.
2000Loneliness of adolescents and their choice and enjoyment of love-celebrating versus love-lamenting popular music. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 18(1), 43–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goss, J. D. & Leinbach, T. R.
1996Focus groups as alternative research practice. Area, 28(2), 115–123.Google Scholar
Hakemulder, J.
2000The moral laboratory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, S.
2010The moral landscape. How science can determine human values. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hawkes, D. L.
1990Communicating your results: A guide for postgraduates. Pontypridd: The Polytechnic of Wales.Google Scholar
Hess, R. G. & Lieger, L. H.
(2004) Creating effective poster presentations. Retrieved June 6, 2005 from http://​www​.ncsu​.edu​/project​/posters/
Holland, N.
1975Five readers reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, M.
1993History of psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Iser, W.
1975Die Appellstruktur der Texte. In R. Warning (Ed.), Rezeptionsästhetik – Theorie und Praxis (pp. 228–52). München: Fink.Google Scholar
1978The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kelle, U.
(Ed.) 1995Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: Theory, methods and practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kinkade, R. G.
1974Thesaurus of psychological index terms. Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, J.
1995Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311, 299–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kreuger, R. A.
1988Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lachenmann, J.
1999Interviews mit Lesenden. Wirkungen von Literatur auf Musiker und Mediziner. [Interviews with readers. Effects of literature on musicians and physicians]. Unpublished MA-thesis, University of Munich.Google Scholar
Limbert, W. M. & Polzella, D. J.
1998Influence of music style on observers’ perception of representational and abstract paintings. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 16(1), 33–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C.
1990The clockwork muse. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mattos, M. J. & Mendes, M.
2002Grupo de Enfoque na Ciência Empírica da Literatura: Atitude dos alunos em relação à literatura. Paper presented at the III ECEL (Encontro de Ciência Empírica da Literatura) in Rio de Janeiro.
McInerney, D. M.
2001Publishing your psychology research: A guide to writing for journals in psychology and related fields. London: Sage.Google Scholar
McNamara, C.
(n.d.). Basics of Conducting Focus Groups. Retrieved December 28, 2004, from http://​www​.mapnp​.org​/library​/evaluatn​/focusgrp​.htm
Mendes, M. & Menezes, D.
2003The influence of authorial prestige on Brazilian students. Paper Presented at the IV ECEL (Encontro de Ciência Empírica da Literatura) in Rio de Janeiro.
Miall, D. S.
1990Readers’ response to narrative: Evaluating, relating, anticipating. Poetics, 19, 323–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D.
1995Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 37–58.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. L., Kreuger, R. A. & King, J. A.
1998The focus group kit. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Morris, D.
1977Manwatching: A field guide to human behavior. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q.
1990Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newsbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Piaget, J.
1948The moral judgment of the child. M. Gabain, (Transl.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Plato
1906The trial and death of Socrates. F. J. Church (Transl.), New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Powell, R. A. & Single, H. M.
1996Focus groups. International Journal of Quality in Health Care, 8(5), 499–504. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radway, J. A.
1984Reading the romance; Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Riessman, C. K.
1993Narrative analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M. & Shoemaker, F. F.
1971Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rose, J.
2001The intellectual life of the British working classes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Saris, W. & Stronkhorst, H.
1984Causal modelling in nonexperimental research. Amsterdam: Sociometric Research Foundation.Google Scholar
Schreier, M.
2001Qualitative methods in studying text reception. In D. Schram & G. Steen (Eds), The psychology and sociology of literature (pp. 35–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shaughnessy, J. J. & Zechtmeister, E. B.
1985Research methods in psychology. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, M.
1999The primacy of movement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shklovsky, V.
(1917/1965) Art as technique. In L. T. Lemon & M. Reis (Eds), Russian Formalist Criticism (pp. 3–24). Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. McH.
(Ed.) 1987Looking up. London: Collins ELT.Google Scholar
Skaife, A. M.
1967The role of deviation and complexity in changing musical taste. Proceedings of the American Psychological Association, Vol. 2, pp. 25–26.Google Scholar
Slater, A., Quinn, P. C., Hayes, R. & Brown, E.
2000The role of facial orientation in newborn infants’ preference for attractive faces. Developmental Science, 3(2), 181–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snow, C. P.
(1959/1993) The two cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, D.
2010Forms of vitality. Exploring dynamic experience in psychology, the arts, psychotherapy, and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J.
1988The Psychologist’s Companion: A guide to scientific writing for students and researchers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stolnitz, J.
1991On the historical triviality of art. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 31, 195–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Peer, W.
2001Justice in Perspective. In W. Van Peer & S. Chatman (Eds), New perspectives on narrative perspective, (pp. 325–38). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Van Peer, W. & Stöger, I.
2001Psycho-analysts and day-dreaming. In G. Steen & D. Schram (Eds), The Psychology and Sociology of Literature (pp. 185–200). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Peer, W., Zyngier, S. & Hakemulder, F.
2007Foregrounding: Past, present, future. In D. Hoover (Ed.), Prospect and retrospect. Papers from the poetics and linguistics association international conference, New York, 2004. Amsterdam: Rodopi West. Crossref
West, R. F., Stanovich, K. E. & Mitchell, H. R.
1993Reading in the real world and its correlates. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(1), 34–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Windelband, W.
1894Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft. Straßburg: Straßburger Rektoratsrede.Google Scholar
Zill, N. & Winglee, M.
1990Who reads literature? Cabin John, MD: Seven Locks Press.Google Scholar
Zillmann, D. & Bryant, J.
1975Viewer’s moral sanction of retribution in the appreciation of dramatic presentations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 572–582. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A.
1991Some parameters of literary and news comprehension: Effects of discourse-type perspective on reading rate and surface structure representation. Poetics, 20, 139–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zyngier, S., Chesnokova, A., & Viana, V.
(Eds.) 2007Acting and connecting: Cultural approaches to language and literature. Berlin: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Zyngier, S., van Peer, W. & Hakemulder, J.
2007Complexity and foregrounding: in the eye of the beholder? Poetics Today 28, 653–682. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Subjects

Literature & Literary Studies

Theoretical literature & literary studies
BIC Subject: DSA – Literary theory
BISAC Subject: LIT006000 – LITERARY CRITICISM / Semiotics & Theory
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2012002714 | Marc record