Article published in:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 21:4 (2020) ► pp. 511–556

Numeral base, numeral classifier, and noun

Word order harmonization

| CNRS | University Lyon 2
| National Chengchi University
Greenberg (1990a: 292) suggests that classifiers (clf) and numeral bases tend to harmonize in word order, i.e. a numeral (Num) with a base-final [n base] order appears in a clf-final [Num clf] order, e.g. in Mandarin Chinese, san1-bai3 (three hundred) ‘300’ and san1 zhi1 gou3 (three clfanimal dog) ‘three dogs’, and a base-initial [base n] Num appears in a clf-initial [clf Num] order, e.g. in Kilivila (Eastern Malayo-Polynesian, Oceanic), akatu-tolu (hundred three) ‘300’ and na-tolu yena (clfanimal-three fish) ‘three fish’. In non-classifier languages, base and noun (N) tend to harmonize in word order. We propose that harmonization between clf and N should also obtain. A detailed statistical analysis of a geographically and phylogenetically weighted set of 400 languages shows that the harmonization of word order between numeral bases, classifiers, and nouns is statistically highly significant, as only 8.25% (33/400) of the languages display violations, which are mostly located at the meeting points between head-final and head-initial languages, indicating that language contact is the main factor in the violations to the probabilistic universals.
Keywords: numeral, numeral base, classifier, noun, word order, harmonization
Published online: 18 September 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00069.all
References

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2000 Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allan, Edward J.
1976 Dizi. In Bender, M. Lionel (ed.), The non-Semitic languages of Ethiopia (Occasional Papers Series, Committee on Ethiopian Studies, Monograph 5), 377–392. East Lansing: African Studies Center, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
[ p. 552 ]
Au Yeung, Ben Wai Hoo
2005 An interface program for parameterization of classifiers in Chinese. Kowloon: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. (Doctoral dis­sertation.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Multiplication basis of emergence of classifiers. Language and Linguistics 8(4). 835–861.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Neil I.
1998 A grammar sketch of Western (Cambodian) Cham. In Thomas, David (ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian linguistics no. 15: Further Chamic studies (Pacific Linguistics Series A-89), 1–20. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics (The Australian National University).Google Scholar
Besnier, Niko
2002 [2000] Tuvaluan: A Polynesian language of the Central Pacific. London: Routledge. (First published in 2000.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2014 Linguistic diversity and universals. In Enfield, Nick J. & Kockelman, Paul & Sidnell, Jack (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology, 102–127. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bisang, Walter
1999 Classifiers in East and Southeast Asian languages: Counting and beyond. In Gvozdanovic, Jadranka (ed.), Numeral types and changes worldwide, 113–186. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blust, Robert
2009 The Austronesian languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics (The Australian National University).Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2005 Structuring sense, volume 1: In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borgman, Donald M.
1990 Sanuma. In Derbyshire, Desmond C. & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, vol. 2, 15–248. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bril, Isabelle
2002 Le nêlêmwa (Nouvelle-Calédonie): Analyse syntaxique et sémantique. Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
Chan, Eugene S. L.
2018 Numeral systems of the world’s languages. (https://​mpi​-lingweb​.shh​.mpg​.de​/numeral/) (Accessed 2018-07-27.)
Cinque, Guglielmo & Krapova, Iliyana
2007 A note on Bulgarian numeral classifiers. In Alboiu, Gabriela & Avram, Andrei A. & Avram, Laurentia Georgeta & Isac, Daniela (eds.), Pitar Moş: A building with a view. Papers in honour of Alexandra Cornilescu, 45–51. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
2013 Numeral bases. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (https://​wals​.info​/chapter​/131) (Accessed 2018-07-27.)
Corbett, Greville G.
2003a Agreement: Canonical instances and the extent of the phenomenon. In Booij, Geert E. & DeCesaris, Janet & Ralli, Angela & Scalise, Sergio (eds.), Topics in morphology: Selected papers form the Third Mediterranean Morphology Meeting, 109–128. Barcelona: Institut Universitari de Lingüistica Aplicada, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
2003b Agreement: Terms and boundaries. In Griffin, William Earl (ed.), The role of agreement in natural language: Proceedings of the 5th Annual Texas Linguistics Society Conference, 109–122. Austin: Texas Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
2003c Agreement: The range of the phenomenon and the principles of the Surrey Database of Agreement. Transactions of the Philological Society 101(2). 155–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Number of genders. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (https://​wals​.info​/chapter​/30) (Accessed 2018-07-27.)
Corbett, Greville G. & Fedden, Sebastian
2016 Canonical gender. Journal of Linguistics 52(3). 495–531. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 553 ]
Derbyshire, Desmond C. & Payne, Doris L.
1990 Noun classification systems of Amazonian languages. In Payne, Doris L. (ed.), Amazonian linguistics: Studies in lowland South American languages, 243–271. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Diniz-Filho, José Alexandre F. & Soares, Thannya N. & Lima, Jacqueline S. & Dobrovolski, Ricardo & Landeiro, Victor Lemes & de Campos Telles, Mariana Pires & Rangel, Thiago F. & Bini, Luis Mauricio
2013 Mantel test in population genetics. Genetics and Molecular Biology 36(4). 475–485. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Mark
2007 Word order in Austronesian from north to south and west to east. Linguistic Typology 11(2). 349–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
1998 Why statistical universals are better than absolute universals. Papers from the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 123–145. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
2013 Order of numeral and noun. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The word atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (https://​wals​.info​/chapter​/89) (Accessed 2018-07-27.)
Epps, Patience & Bowern, Claire & Hansen, Cynthia A. & Hill, Jane H. & Zentz, Jason
2012 On numeral complexity in hunter-gatherer languages. Linguistic Typology 16(1). 41–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Levinson, Stephen C.
2009 The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(5). 429–448. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fedden, Sebastian & Corbett, Greville G.
2017 Gender and classifiers in concurrent systems: Refining the typology of nominal classification. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2(1). 1–47. (Article 34.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fleisch, Axel
2000 Lucazi grammar: A morphosemantic analysis (Grammatical Analyses of African Languages 15). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Frank, Paul Stephen
1985 A grammar of Ika. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Gil, David
2013 Numeral classifiers. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (https://​wals​.info​/chapter​/55) (Accessed 2018-07-27.)
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1990a Generalizations about numeral systems. In Denning, Keith M. & Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.), On language: Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, 271–309. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1990b Numeral classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. In Denning, Keith M. & Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.), On language: Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, 166–193. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Grinevald, Colette
2000 A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers. In Senft, Gunter (ed.), Systems of nominal classification, 50–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2015 Classifiers, linguistics of. In Wright, James D. (ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 2nd edn., 811–818. Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Her, One-Soon
2012 Distinguishing classifiers and measure words: A mathematical perspective and implications. Lingua 122(14). 1668–1691. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 554 ]
2017a Deriving classifier word order typology, or Greenberg’s Universal 20A and Universal 20. Linguistics 55(2). 265–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017b Structure of numerals and classifiers in Chinese: Historical and typological perspectives and cross-linguistic implications. Language and Linguistics 18(1). 26–71.Google Scholar
Her, One-Soon & Hsieh, Chen-Tien
2010 On the semantic distinction between classifiers and measure words in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 11(3). 527–551.Google Scholar
Her, One-Soon & Tang, Marc & Li, Bing-Tsiong
2019 Word order of numeral classifiers and numeral bases: Harmonization by multiplication. Language Typology and Universals 72(3). 421–452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Her, One-Soon & Tsai, Hui-Chin
2020 Left is right, right is not: On the constituency of the classifier phrase in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 21(1). 1–32.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2017 The morphology of numerals and classifiers in Japhug. In Ding, Picus Sizhi & Pelkey, Jamin (eds.), Sociohistorical linguistics in Southeast Asia: New horizons for Tibeto-Burman studies in honor of David Bradley, 135–148. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jany, Carmen
2009 Chimariko grammar: Areal and typological perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Li Julie & Hu, Suhua
2010 On bare classifier phrases. In Clemens, Lauren Eby & Liu, Chi-Ming Louis (eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-22) & the 18th Annual Meeting of the International Association of Chinese Linguistics (IACL-18), vol. 2, 230–241. Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Kilarski, Marcin
2013 Nominal classification: A history of its study from the classical period to the present (Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 121). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 The place of classifiers in the history of linguistics. Historiographia Linguistica 41(1). 33–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiryu, Kazuyuki
2009 On the rise of the classifier system in Newar. In Nagano, Yasuhiko (ed.), Issues in Tibeto-Burman historical linguistics (Senri Ethnological Studies 75), 51–69. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
Klamer, Marian
2014 Numeral classifiers in the Papuan languages of Alor and Pantar: A comparative perspective. In Klamer, Marian & Kratochvíl, František (eds.), Number and quantity in East Nusantara: Papers from 12-ICAL, vol. 1, 103–122. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics (The Australian National University). (https://​openresearch​-repository​.anu​.edu​.au​/handle​/1885​/11917) (Accessed 2020-03-25.)
Levshina, Natalia
2015 How to do linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (https://​benjamins​.com​/catalog​/z​.195) (Accessed 2020-​04-07.) Crossref
Lewis, M. Paul
(ed.) 2009 Ethnologue: Languages of the world. Dallas: SIL International. (https://​www​.ethnologue​.com​/16/) (Accessed 2020-05-05.)
Mano, Miho
2012 Compositional mechanisms of Japanese numeral classifiers. In Manurung, Ruli & Bond, Francis (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, 620–625. Depok: Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Indonesia.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A.
1995 Sino-Tibetan numerals and the play of prefixes. Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology 20(1). 105–251.Google Scholar
[ p. 555 ]
Meakins, Felicity & Nordlinger, Rachel
2014 A grammar of Bilinarra: An Australian aboriginal language of the Northern Territory (Pacific Linguistics 640). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ostapirat, Weera
2000 Proto-Kra. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 23(1). 1–251.Google Scholar
2005 Kra-Dai and Austronesian: Notes on phonological correspondences and vocabulary distribution. In Sagart, Laurent & Blench, Roger & Sanchez-Mazas, Alicia (eds.), The peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics, 1st edn., 107–131. London: Routledge Curzon. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pensalfini, Robert J.
1997 Jingulu grammar, dictionary, and texts. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Piantadosi, Steven T. & Gibson, Edward
2014 Quantitative standards for absolute linguistic universals. Cognitive Science 38(4). 736–756. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
2020 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (https://​www​.R​-project​.org/) (Accessed 2020-​03-25.)
Seifart, Frank
2005 The structure and use of shape-based noun classes in Miraña (North West Amazon). Nijmegen: Radboud University. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Shakya, Daya R.
1997 Classifiers and their syntactic functions in Nepal Bhasa. Himalaya (The Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies) 17(1). 1–24.Google Scholar
Sheskin, David J.
2011 Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. 5th edn. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Gail M. & Feinn, Richard
2012 Using effect size—or why the P value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education 4(3). 279–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sussex, Roland & Cubberley, Paul
2009 The Slavic languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toyota, Junichi
2009 When the mass was counted: English as classifier and non-classifier language. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 6(1). 118–130. (http://​www​.skase​.sk​/Volumes​/JTL13​/pdf​_doc​/07​.pdf) (Accessed 2020-03-26.)
Velupillai, Viveka
2012 An introduction to linguistic typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vittrant, Alice
2002 Classifier systems and noun categorization devices in Burmese. In Chew, Patrick (ed.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special session on Tibeto-Burman and Southeast Asian linguistics, 129–148. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Watters, David E.
2002 A grammar of Kham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams-van Klinken, Catharina & Hajek, John & Nordlinger, Rachel
2002 Tetun Dili: A grammar of an East Timorese language (Pacific Linguistics 528). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics (The Australian National University).Google Scholar
Yamamoto, Kasumi & Keil, Frank
2000 The acquisition of Japanese numeral classifiers: Linkage between grammatical forms and conceptual categories. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9(4). 379–409. Crossref[ p. 556 ]Google Scholar