The Carthaginian North: Semitic influence on early Germanic

A linguistic and cultural study

| Western Sydney University
| University of Munich
Hardbound – Available
ISBN 9789027204011 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
 
e-Book –
ISBN 9789027262141 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
 
This book presents a new and innovative theory on the origin of the Germanic languages. This theory presents solutions to four pivotal problems in the history of Germanic with critical implications for cultural history: the origin of the Germanic writing system (the Runic alphabet), the genesis of the Germanic strong verbs, the development of the Germanic word order, and etymologies for key elements of the Germanic lexicon. The book proposes that all four problems can be solved if it is hypothesized that over 2,000 years ago the ancestor of all Germanic languages, Proto-Germanic, was in intensive contact with Punic, a Semitic language from the Mediterranean. This scenario is explored by focusing on linguistic data, supported by an interdisciplinary mosaic of evidence. This book is of interest to anyone working on the linguistic and cultural history of the Germanic languages.
[NOWELE Supplement Series, 32]  2019.  xiii, 268 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
https://doi.org/10.1075/nss.32
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
Preface
Chapter 1. Introduction
2–30
Chapter 2. Theoretical foundations
32–42
Chapter 3. Context, location and initial contact setting
44–55
Chapter 4. Punic elements in the Proto-Germanic lexicon
58–107
Chapter 5. Punic influence in the Germanic verb system: The strong verbs
110–133
Chapter 6. Explaining the Germanic split word order
136–140
Chapter 7. The origin of the oldest Germanic writing system
142–186
Chapter 8. Extralinguistic evidence
188–235
Chapter 9. Conclusion
238–241
References
243–263
Index
“The book brings up many interesting points and possible explanations for unexplained features of Germanic. [...] The big question is whether the underlying hypothesis is correct. Was there contact between Punic and Pre- or Proto-Germanic? The authors are agnostic on this front; they have made a linguistic argument and provided enough extralinguistic evidence to show that contact need not be ruled out. [...] In any case, the book is a fascinating one that is sure to stir up some lively discussions.”
References

References

Acquaro, E. 1988 Phönizier und Etrusker. In Sabatino Moscati (ed.), Die Phönizier, 532–537. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N.
2003 Bilingualism and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, A. Y.
2007 Grammars in Contact: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Grammars in Contact: A Crosslinguistic Typology, 1–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aktüre, Z.
2014 Phoenician settlement in the Mediterranean and the culture-history paradigm. In José Maria Álvarez Martínez, Trinidad Nogales Basarrate & Isabel Rodà de Llanza (eds.), Proceedings of 8th International Congress of Classical Archaeology. Rome: Museo Nacional de Arte Romano.Google Scholar
Albright, W. F.
1941 Anath and the dragon. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 84. 14–17.Google Scholar
Almgren, O.
1926 Hällristningar och kultbruk: Bidrag till belysning av de Nordiska bronsaldersristningarnas innebörd (Kungl. Vitterhets Historie Och Antikvitets Akademiens Handlingar 35). Stockholm: Lagerström.Google Scholar
1934 Nordische Felszeichnungen als religiöse Urkunden. Frankfurt a. M.: M. Diesterweg.Google Scholar
Aly, W.
1927 Die Entdeckung des Westens: Die Überlieferung von Hannos Fahrtbericht. Hermes 62. 299–341, 485–489.Google Scholar
Amadasi Guzzo, M. G. and Röllig, W.
1995 La Langue. In Véronique Krings (ed.), La civilisation phénicienne et punique: Manuel de recherche (Handbuch Der Orientalistik. Erste Abteilung. Der nahe und mittlere Osten 20). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ameling, W.
1993 Karthago: Studien zu Militär, Staat und Gesellschaft. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Amira, K. von
1900 Recht. In Hermann Paul (ed.), Grundriß der germanischen Philologie, vol. 3: Wirtschaft, Recht, Kriegswesen, Mythologie, Sitte, Kunst, Heldensage, Ethnographie, 51–222. Straßburg: Karl Trübner.Google Scholar
Anchimbe, E.
2006 Cameroon English: Authenticity, Ecology and Evolution (Arbeiten Zur Sprachanalyse 45). Frankfurt a. Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Anger, Eberhard
(ed.) 1998 Der Taschenbrockhaus: Unsere Welt. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus.Google Scholar
Anonymous
1725 A New Canting Dictionary: Comprehending All the Terms, Ancient and Modern, Used in the Several Tribes of Gypsies, Beggars, Shoplifters, Highwaymen, Foot-pads, and All Other Clans of Cheats and Villains. Interspersed with Proverbs, Phrases, Figurative Speeches, &c. Being a Complete Collection of All that Has Been Publish’d of that Kind. With Very Large Additions of Words Never Before Made Publick … With a Preface, Giving an Account of the Original, Progress, &c. of the Canting Crew; and Recommending Methods for Diminishing These Varlets, by Better Employment of the Poor. To which is Added a Complete Collection of Songs in the Canting Dialect. London and Westminster. books​.google​.de​/books​/about​/A​_New​_Canting​_Dictionary​.html​?id​=0LosAQAAMAAJ​&redir​_esc​=y (6 February 2016).Google Scholar
Anttila, R. 1972 An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Arntz, H.
1944 Handbuch der Runenkunde (Sammlung Kurzer Grammatiken Germanischer Dialekte B: Ergänzungsreihe, 3). repr. Bonn: Lemperz 2007. Halle/Saale: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Arruda, A. M.
2009 Phoenician Colonization on the Atlantic Coast of the Iberian Peninsula. In Michael Dietler & Carolina López-Ruiz (eds.), Colonial Encounters in Ancient Iberia, 113–130. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aubet, M. E.
2001 The Phoenicians and the West: politics, conolnies and trade. (Trans.) Mary Turton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2008 Political and economic implications of the new Phoenician chronologies. In Claudia Sagona (ed.), Beyond the homeland: Markers in Phoenician Chronology, 247–260. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Augst, G.
1975 Lexikon zur Wortbildung (Forschungsberichte des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache Mannheim 24.1–3). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Axel, K.
2007 Studies on Old High German syntax: Left sentence periphery, verb placement and verb second. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bach, A.
1970 Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. 3rd ed. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar
Baltsan, H.
1992 Webster’s New World Hebrew Dictionary. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bammesberger, A.
1986 Der Aufbau des germanischen Verbalsystems. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
1990 Die Morphologie des urgermanischen Nomens. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Bately, J.
1989 The Old English Oriosius. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beekes, R. S. P.
1998 The Origin of Latin aqua and of *teutaa “people.” Journal of Indo-European Studies 26. 459–466.Google Scholar
Behre, K.-E.
2004 Coastal development, sea-level change and settlement history during the later Holocene in the Clay District of Lower Saxony (Niedersachsen), northern Germany. Quaternary International 112. 37–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belarte, M. C.
2009 Colonial Contacts and Protohistoric Indigenous Urbanism on the Mediterranean Coast of the Iberian Peninsula. In Michael Dietler & Carolina López-Ruiz (eds.), Colonial Encounters in Ancient Iberia, 91–112. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belén Deamos, M.
2009 Phoenicians in Tartessos. In Michael Dietler & Carolina López-Ruiz (eds.), Colonial Encounters in Ancient Iberia, 193–228. London/Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benor, S. B.
2010 Ethnolinguistic repertoire: Shifting the analytic focus in language and ethnicity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14. 159–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berenbaum, Michael & Skolnik, Fred
(eds.) 2007 Encyclopaedia Judaica. 2nd ed. 22 vols. Detroit: Macmillan Reference.Google Scholar
Biville, F.
2002 The Graeco-Romans and Graeco-Latin: A Terminological Framework for Cases of Bilingualism. In J. N. Adams & Simon Swain (eds.), Bilingualism in Ancient Society. Language Contact and the Written Text, 77–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blažek, V.
2014 Punic loans in Berber languages and their role in chronology of Berber. Folia Orientalia 51. 231–249.Google Scholar
Böhm, G. 2002 Sprache und Geschichte im kanarischen Archipel (Beiträge Zur Afrikanistik 72).Vol. 2. 2 vols. Vienna: Institute für Afrikanistik und Ägyptologie.Google Scholar
Bostock, J. K.
1955 A handbook on Old High German literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Botigué, L. R., Henn, B. M., Gravel, S., Maples, B. K., Gignoux, C. R., Corona, E., Atzmon, G., et al.
2013 Gene flow from North Africa contributes to differential human genetic diversity in southern Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(29). 11791–11796. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boutkan, D. and Siebinga, S. M.
2005 Old Frisian Etymological Dictionary (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 1). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Braune, W.
1962 Althochdeutsches Lesebuch. (Ed.) Ernst A. Ebbinghaus. 14th ed. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
2004 Althochdeutsche Grammatik I (Sammlung Kurzer Grammatiken Germanischer Dialekte A.5/1). (Ed.) Ingo Reiffenstein. 15th ed. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braunmüller, K.
1982 Syntaxtypologische Studien zum Germanischen (Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 197). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Brekle, H. E.
1994 Die Antiqualinie von ca. -1500 bis ca. +1500: Untersuchungen zur Morphogenese des westlichen Alphabets auf kognitivistischer Basis. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Brøndal, V.
1917 Substrater og laan, i Romansk og Germansk: Studier i lyd- og ordhistorie. Copenhagen. Copenhagen: G. E. C. Gad.Google Scholar
Brown, F., Driver, S. R. and Briggs, C. A.
1979 The new Brown – Driver – Briggs – Gesenius Hebrew and English lexicon: With an appendix containing the Biblical Aramaic. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson.Google Scholar
Brunner, K.
1965 Altenglische Grannmatik: Nach der Angelsächsischen Grammatik von Eduard Sievers (Sammlung Kurzer Grammatiken Germanischer Dialekte, A.3). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, L.
1969 Die gemeinsamen Wurzeln des semitischen und indogermanischen Wortschatzes: Versuch einer Etymologie. Berne: A. Francke.Google Scholar
Buck, C. D.
1904 A Grammar of Oscan and Umbrian. Boston: The Athenaeum Press.Google Scholar
Bunson, M.
2012 Encyclopedia of Ancient Rome. Landisville: Yurchak Printing.Google Scholar
Buxó, R.
2009 Botanical and Archaeological Dimensions of the Colonial Encounter. In Michael Dietler & Carolina López-Ruiz (eds.), Colonial Encounters in Ancient Iberia, 155–168. London/Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. and Slobin, D.
1982 Roles and Schemas in the Development and Use of the English past tense. Language 58. 265–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A.
1959 Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cancik, H. and Schneider, H.
2000 Der neue Pauly: Enzyklopädie der Antike.Vol. 8: Mer-Op. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar
2002 Der neue Pauly: Enzyklopädie der Antike.Vol. 12: Tam-Vel. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Caquot, A. M., Sznycer, A. and Herner, A.
1973 Textes ougaritiques I: Mythes et légendes (Littératures Anciennes Du Proche-Orient 7). Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Caudal, P., Mailhammer, R. and Bednall, J.
2019 A comparative account of the Iwaidja and Anindilyakwa modal systems. Paper presented at the Australian Languages Workshop, The University of Melbourne, Camp Marysville.
Cerrón-Paolmino, R. M. 1987 Lingüística quechua. Cuzco, Peru: Centro de Estudios Rurales Andinos “Bartolomé de las Casas.”Google Scholar
Chantraine, P.
1968 Dictionnaire étymologige de la langue grecque: Histoire des mots.4 vols. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Charles-Picard, G. and Charles-Picard, C.
1983 Karthago: Leben und Kultur. (Trans.) Ignaz Miller. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Cichosz, A.
2010 The influence of text type on word order of Old Germanic languages. A corpus-based contrastive study of Old English and Old High German. Frankfurt a. Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cichosz, A., Gaszewski, J. and Pęzik, P.
2016 Element Order in Old English and Old High German Translations. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Eisenbeiss, S. and Sonnenstuhl-Henning, I.
1997 Morphological structure and the processing of inflected words. Theoretical Linguistics 23. 225–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark Hall, J. R. and Meritt, H. D.
1960 A concise Anglo-Saxon dictionary. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coetsem, F. van
2000 A General and Unified Theory of the Transmission Process in Language Contact. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Cohen, D.
1970 Dictionnaire des racine sémitiques ou attestées dans les langues sémitiques: Comprenant un ficher comparatif de Jean Cantineau.Vol. 1. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Cohen, M.
1926 Sur le nom d’un contenant à entrelacs dans le monde méditerranéen. Bulletin de la Societé de Linguistique de Paris 27(81–120).Google Scholar
Corbett, G.
2009 Suppletion: Typology, markedness and complexity. In Patrick Steinkrüger & Manfred Krifka (eds.), On inflection, 25–40. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F.
1996 The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B.
2001 Facing the ocean: the Atlantic and its Peoples. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö.
1985 Tense and Aspect Systems. Malden, MA: B. Blackwell. http://​books​.google​.com​.au​/books​?id​=zUqkQgAACAAJ.Google Scholar
Daniels, Peter T. & Bright, William
(eds.) 1996 The world’s writing systems. Oxford: Oxfod University Press.Google Scholar
Demandt, A.
1995 Antike Staatsformen. Eine vergleichende Verfassungsgeschichte der Alten Welt. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Derolez, R. L. M.
1963 Götter und Mythen der Germanen. Wiesbaden: VMA-Verlag.Google Scholar
Deuchar, M.
2016 Cross-language effects in bilingual production and comnprehension: some novel findings. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19(4). 706–709. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dietler, M.
2009 Colonial Encounters in Iberia and the Western Mediterranean: An Exploratory Framework. In Michael Dietler & Carolina López-Ruiz (eds.), Colonial Encounters in Ancient Iberia, 3–48. London/Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dietler, M. and López-Ruiz, C.
2009 Encounters in Ancient Iberia: A coda. In Michael Dietler & Carolina López-Ruiz (eds.), Colonial Encounters in Ancient Iberia, 299–312. London/Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrov, A.
2005 Münzwesen und Sprachkontakt. Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, ms.Google Scholar
Donner, H. and Röllig, W.
1973 Kanaanäische und aramäische Inschriften. 3rd ed. 3 vols. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Donner, H., and W. Röllig 1966 1968  Kanaanäische und aramäische Inschriften. Bd. 1: Texte, Bd. 2: Kommentar . 2nd ed. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Drommelen, P. van
1997 Colonial constructs: colonialism and archaeology in the Mediterranean. World Archaeology 28. 305–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duerr, H. P.
2005 Rungholt : die Suche nach einer versunkenen Stadt. Frankfurt am Main: Insel.Google Scholar
Düwel, K.
2008 Runenkunde (Sammlung Metzeler 72). 4th ed. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzeler. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Düwel, K. and Heizmann, W.
2006 Das ältere Fuþark: Überlieferung und Wirkungsmöglichkeiten der Runen. In Alfred Bammesberger & Gaby Waxenberger (eds.), Das Fuþark und seine einzelsprachlichen Weiterentwicklungen: Akten der Tagung in Eichstätt vom 20. bis 24. Juli 2003 (Ergänzungsbände zum Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde 51), 3–60. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eades, Diana
2014 Aboriginal English. In: Koch, Harold & Rachel Nordlinger (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Australia: a comprehensive guide, 417-447. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter MoutonGoogle Scholar
E., B
1899 A NEW DICTIONARY OF THE Terms Ancient and Modern of the Canting Crew, In its several TRIBES, OF Gypsies, Beggers, Thieves, Cheats, &c., WITH An Addition of some Proverbs, Phrases, Figurative Speeches, &c.: Useful for all sorts of People, (especially Foreigners) to secure their money and preserve their Lives; besides very Diverting and Entertaining, being wholly New. London: W. Hawes. https://​archive​.org​/details​/newdictionaryoft00begeuoft (6 February 2016).Google Scholar
Ebert, R. P.
1990 Review of Fred Weereman, The V2 conspiracy: A synchronic and a diachronic analysis of verbal positions in Germanic languages, (Publications in Language Sciences, 31), Dordrecht: Foris, 1989. Studies in Language 14. 490–498. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, H.
1980 Deutsche Sprachgeschichte I. 10th ed. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Ehrismann, O.-R.
1970 Volk: Eine Wortgeschichte (vom Ende des 8. Jahrhunderts bis zum Barock). Gießen: University of Gießen PhD dissertation.
Eiliger, W.
1990 Karthago: Stadt der Punier, Römer, Christen. Berlin/Cologne: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Ellison, T. M. and Miceli, L.
2017 Language monitoring in bilinguals as a mechanism for rapid lexical divergence. Language 93. 255–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ernout, A. and Meillet, A.
1985  Dictionnaire étymologice de la langue latine: Historie des mots. rev. 4th. Paris: Klinksieck.Google Scholar
Euzennat, M.
1994 Le périple d’Hannon. Comptes redus des séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 138. 559–580.Google Scholar
Eythórsson, T.
1995 Verbal syntax in the early Germanic languages. Cornell University. www​.academia​.edu​/1836851​/Verbal​_Syntax​_in​_the​_Early​_Germanic​_Languages, (25 September 2015).
1996 Functional categories, cliticization, and verb movement in the early Germanic languages. In Höskuldur Thráinsson, Steve Peter & Samuel David Epstein (eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 38), vol. 2. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 The syntax of verbs in Early Runic. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 67. 1–55.Google Scholar
Falileyev, A.
2000 Etymological Glossary of Old Welsh. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferraresi, G.
2005 Word order and phrase structure in Gothic (Orbis Supplementa 25). Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Février, J. G. 1949 A propos de Ba’al Addir. Semitica 2. 21–28.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, K.
1998 Taschenwörterbuch Althebräisch-Deutsch zum Alten Testament. 29th ed. Berlin: Langenscheidt.Google Scholar
Fischer, H.
1966 Schrifttafeln zum althochdeutschen Lesebuch. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, J.
2001 Can threatened langauges be saved? Reversing language shift revisited: a 21st century perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Fortson, B. W. I.
2010 Indo-European Language and Culture. 2nd ed. Maldon, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Freeman, P.
2001 Ireland and the Classical World. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, J. and Röllig, W.
1999 Phönizisch-Punische Grammatk. Rome: Edifice Pontifico Instituto Biblico.Google Scholar
Friedrich, P.
1976 The devil’s case: PIE as SVO. In Alphonse Juilland (ed.), Linguistic studies offered to Joseph Greenberg on the occasion of his sixtieth birhtday, vol. 3: syntax, 463–480. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.Google Scholar
Friesen, O. von
1933 De germanska, anglofrisiska och tyska runorna. In Otto von Friesen (ed.), Runorna (Nordisk Kultur 6), 3–79. Stockholm: Bonnier.Google Scholar
Frisk, H.
1973 Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. 2nd/3rd. 2 vols. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Gabelentz, G. von der
1891 Die Sprachwissenschaft, ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. (Ed.) Albrecht Graf von der Schulenburg. 2nd ed. Leipzig: T. O. Weigel.Google Scholar
Gafos, A.
2003 Greenberg’s asymmetry in Arabic: A consequence of stems in paradigms. Language 79(2). 317–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gascou, J. and Guéry, R.
1989 Inscriptions du Sud constantinois. Antiquités africaines 25. 45–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gensler, O. D.
1993 A typological evaluation of Celtic/Hamito-Semitic syntactic parallels. University of California, Berkeley.
Gillon, C. and Mailhammer, R.
2015 Reanalyzing the Morphology And Semantics Of Verbal Plural Marking In Quechan. International Journal of American Linguistics 81. 573–593. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldenberg, G.
2013 Semitic Languages: Features, Structures, Relations, Processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Golther, W.
1895 Handbuch der germanischen Mythologie. repr. Essen: Phaidon.Google Scholar
González-Ruibal, A.
2004 Facing two seas: Mediterranean and Atlandic contacts in the north-west of Ibearia in the first millennium BC. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 23(3). 287–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodchild, R. G.
1954 La necropoli romano-libica di Bir ed Dréder. Quaderni di archeologica della Libia 3. 91–107.Google Scholar
Götzinger, E.
1885 Reallexicon der deutschen Altertümer: Ein Hand- und Nachschlagebuch der Kulturgeschichte des deutschen Volkes. 2nd compl. reworked. Leipzig: Woldemar Urban.Google Scholar
Gray, B.
1978 Class and Classics: The Social Basis of Ancient Bilingualism. Language Sciences 1. 50–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, A. R. W.
2003 The Storm-God in the Ancient Near East (Biblical and Judaic Studies from the University of California, San Diego 8). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Green, C.
2015 Thanet, Tanit and the Phoenicians: Place-Names, Archaeology and Pre-Roman Trading Settlements in Eastern Kent? Dr Caitlin R. Green History – Archaeology – Lectures & Seminars. http://​www​.caitlingreen​.org​/2015​/04​/thanet​-tanit​-and​-the​-phoenicians​.html.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. 1966 Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 73–113. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grimm, J.
1981 Deutsche Mythologie. 4th ed. 3 vols. Frankfurt a. M.: Ullstein.Google Scholar
Grimm, J. and Grimm, W.
1854 Deutsches Wörterbuch. Leipzig: HIrzel.
Gsell, S.
1913 Historice ancienne de l’Afrique du Nord.Vol. 1. Paris: Libraire Hachette.Google Scholar
Guirand, F.
1959 Assyro-Babylonian Mythology. In Robert Graves & Delano Ames Richard Aldington (eds.), trans.The Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology, 49–72. London: Paul Hamlyn.Google Scholar
Gutenbrunner, S.
1944 Der zweite Merseburger Spruch im Lichte nordischer Überlieferungen. Zeitschrift für deutsches Altertum und deutsche Literatur 80. 1–5.Google Scholar
Haarmann, H.
2011 Geschichte der Schrift: Von den Hieroglyhen bis heute (C. H. Beck Wissen 2198). 4th corr. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Habel, E. and Gröbel, F.
1959 Mittellateinisches Glossar. 2nd ed. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar
Hackert, S.
2008 Counting and coding the past: Circumscribing the variable context in quantitative analyses of past inflection. Language Variation and Change 20. 127–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hackett, J. A.
2004 Phoenician and Punic. In Roger D. Woodard (ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of the world’s ancient languages, 365–385. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2008 Phoenician and Punic. In Roger D. Woodard (ed.), The Ancient Languages of Syria-Palestine and Arabia, 82–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haider, H.
2014 The VO-OV split of Germanic languages – a T3 & V2 production. Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis 19. 57–69.Google Scholar
Harbert, W.
2007 The Germanic Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harden, D.
1963  The Phoenicians. revised. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V.
2008 Roman Expansion in the West. In A. E. Astin, F. W Walbank, M. W. Frederiksen & R. M. Ogilvie (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History (Cambridge Histories Online), 104–142. Second. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Z.
1936 A Grammar of the Phoenician Language. New Haven: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Tadmor, Uri
(eds.) 2009 World Loanword Database. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wold​.clld​.org. (11 February 2015). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heidermanns, F.
1993 Etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen Primäradjektive (Studia Linguistica Germanica 33). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hempl, G.
1898 The origin of the runes. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 2. 370–374.Google Scholar
Hennig, R.
1944 Terrae Incognitae: Eine Zusammenstellung und kritische Bewertung der wichtigsten vorcolumbischen Entdechungsreisen an Hand der darüber vorliegenden Originalberichte: Altertum bis Ptolemäus. 2nd ed. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Herold, G.
1941 Der Volksbegriff im Sprachschatz des Althochdeutschen und Altniederdeutschen (Junge Forschung: Untersuchungen zur Geistesgeschichte 8). Halle: Akademischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Hetzron, R.
1969 Two notes on Semitc laryngeals in East Gurage. Phonetica 19(69–81).Google Scholar
Heusler, A.
1925 Deutsche Versgeschichte: Mit Einschluss des altenglischen und altnordischen Stabreimverses.Vol. 1, Parts 1 and 2: Einführendes, Grundbegriffe der Verslehre; Der altgermanische Vers. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hill, E.
2010 A case study in grammaticalized inflectional morphology. Diachronica 27. 411–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirt, H. 1921 Etymologie der neuhochdeutschen Sprache: Darstellung des deutschen Wortschatzes in seiner geschichtlichen Entwicklung. 2nd ed. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Höfler, O.
1951 Balders Bestattung und die nordischen Felszeichnungen. Anzeiger der Phil.-hist. Klasse der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien 23. 343–372.Google Scholar
Hoftijzer, J. and Jongeling, K.
1995 Dictionary of the North-West Semitic inscriptions (Handbuch Der Orientalistik, Erste Abteilung: Der Nahe Und Mittlere Osten 21).2 vols. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Holland, G. B.
1980 Problem of word order change in selected Indo-European languages. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Holst, J. H.
2010 Zur germanischen Satzgliederstellung. In Armin R. Bachmann, Christliebe El Mogharbel & Katja Hunmstedt (eds.), Form und Struktur in der Sprache: Festschrift für Elmar Ternes, 143–160. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Hornby, A. S. et al.
1963 The Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huehnergard, J.
2015 Biblical Hebrew nominal patterns. In Jeremy M. Hutton & Aaron D. Rubin (eds.), Epigraphy, philology, and the Hebrew Bible: Methodological perspectives on philological and comparative study of the Hebrew Bible in honor of Jo Ann Hackett (Society of Biblical Literature Ancient Near East Monographs), 25–64. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Liteature.Google Scholar
Huß, W.
2008 Karthago. 4th ed. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Hutterer, C. J.
1975 Die germanischen Sprachen: Ihre Geschichte in Grundzügen. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Janse, M.
2002 Aspects of Bilingualism in the History of the Greek Language. In J. N. Adams & Simon Swain (eds.), Bilingualism in Ancient Society. Language Contact and the Written Text, 332–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jasanoff, J.
2003 Hittite and the Indo-European Verb. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, G. K.
1977 Coins of Punic Sicily, Part 3. Schweizerische Numismatische Rundschau / Swiss Numismatic Review 56. 5–65.Google Scholar
Jenkins, G. K. and Lewis, R. B.
1963 Carthaginian gold and electrum coins (Royal Numismatic Society Special Publications 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenni, E.
1981 Lehrbuch der hebräischen Sprache des Alten Testaments. Basel: Helbing & Lichtenhahn.Google Scholar
Jensen, H.
1969 Die Schrift in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart. Berlin: VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Jongeling, K.
1985 Vowel assimilation in Punic. Jaarbericht van het Vooraziatisch-Egyptisch Genootschap “Ex oriente lux” 29. 124–132.Google Scholar
2008 Handbook of Neo-Punic inscriptions. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Jongeling, K. and Kerr, R. M.
2005 Late Punic epigraphy: An introduction to the study of Neo-Punic and Latino-Punic inscriptions. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, O. B.
1987 Billeder og myter fra bronzealderen: Træk af ældre bronzealders religion i Norden (Jysk Arkæologisk Selskabs Skrifter 20). Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Juge, M. L.
2009 Why Do Languages Lose Grammatical Categories: Latin and Romance Evidence. Romance Quarterly 56(1). 68–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kallestinova, E. D.
2007 Aspects of Russian word order. University of Iowa PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Kallio, P.
2015 The stratigraphy of the Germanic loanwords in Finnic. In John Ole Askedal & Hans-Frede Nielsen (eds.), Early Germanic Languages in Contact (NOWELE Supplement Series 27). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karatsareas, P. 2016 Convergence in word structure. Revisiting agglutinative noun inflection in Cappadocian Greek. Diachronica 33. 31–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kästner, H.
1981 Phonetik und Phonologie des modernen Hocharabisch. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul
2010 Contact and New Varieties. In: Raymond Hickey (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact, 230-251. Malden: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
2013 Koinezation. In: Chambers J. K. and Natalie Schilling (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 519-536. Malden: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Kienast, B.
2001 Historische Semitische Sprachwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Klein, E.
1987 Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the Hebrew Language for Readers of English. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kluge, F.
1926 Nominale Stammbildungslehre der altgermanischen Dialekte (Sammlung Kurzer Grammatiken Germanischer Dialekte, Ergänzungsreihe 1). (Ed.) Ludwig Sütterlin. 3rd ed. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
2011 Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. (Ed.) Elmar Seebold. 25th ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Knirk, J.
2002 Runes: Origin, development of the futhark, dunctions, applications, and methodological considerations. In Oscar Bandle, Kurt Braunmüller, Ernst Hakon Jahr, Allan Karker, Hans-Peter Naumann, Ulf Telemann, Lennart Elmevik & Gun Widmark (eds.), The Nordic Languages: An International Handbook of the History of the North Germanic Languages (Handbooks of Linguistic and Communication Science 22.1–2), vol. 1, 634–648. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Köbler, G.
1994 Taschenwörterbuch des althochdeutschen Sprachschatzes. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Koehler, L. and Baumgartner, W.
1967 Hebräisches und aramäisches Lexikon zum Alten Testament. 3rd ed. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Krahe, H.
1967 Germanische Sprachwissenschaft. (Ed.) Wolfgang Meid.Vol. III. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Krahmalkov, C. R.
2000 Phoenician-Punic dictionary (Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta, 90: Studia Phoenicia XV). Leuven: Peeters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 A Phoenician-Punic Grammar. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Krause, W.
1966 Die Runeninschriften im älteren Futhark: Mit Beiträgen von Herbert Jankuhn. I. Text; II. Tafeln (Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Philologisch-Historische Klasse, Folge 3 65). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
1970 Runen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1971 Die Sprache der urnordischen Runeninschriften. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Kresić, M. and Roco, G.
2012 Sprachidentität und Kontext. In Claudia Schmidt-Harn (ed.), Sprache(n) als europäisches Kulturgut – Languages as European Cultural Asset, 17–38. Innsbruck/Wien/Bozen: StudienVerlag.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Dussias, P. E., Bice, K. and Perrotti, L.
2015 Bilingualism, Mind, and Brain. Annual Review of Linguistics 1. 377–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroonen, G.
2013 Etymological dictionary of Proto-Germanic (Leiden Indo-European Dictionary Series 11). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Krüger, B.
1983 Die Germanen: Geschichte und Kultur der germanischen Stämme in MItteleuropa. 4th ed. Vol. 1. 2 vols. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Kuhn, H.
1961 Anlautend p- im Germanischen. Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung 28. 1–31.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, J.
1961 L’apophonie en Sémitique. Wrozław: Zakł. im Ossolińskich.Google Scholar
Laks, L. 2015 Variation and change in instrument noun formation in Hebrew and its relation to the verbal system. Word Structure 8. 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lane, E. W.
1863 An Arabic-English lexicon: Derived from the best and the most copious Eastern sources.Vol. 1, part 1. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Le Page, R. B. and Tabouret-Keller, A.
1985 Acts of identity: Creole-based approaches to language and ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W. P.
1974 Proto-Indo-European syntax. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
1986 A Gothic etymological dictionary, based on the third edition of Vergleichendes Wörterbuch der gotischen Sprache by Siegmund Feist. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Levin, S.
1995 Semitic and Indo-European: The principal etymologies: With observations on Afro-Asiatic (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science 129). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, A.
2004 Some controversial aspects of the myth of Baldr. Alvíssmál 11. 17–54.Google Scholar
Liebich, B.
1899 Die Wortfamilien der lebenden hochdeutschen Sprache als Grundlage für ein System der Bedeutungslehre. Teil l : Die Wortfamilien in alphabetischer Ordnung: Nach Heynes deutschem Wörterbuch bearbeitet. Breslau: Preuss und Jünger.Google Scholar
Liestøl, A.
1981 The Viking runes: The transition from the older to the younger Fuþark. Saga-Book (Viking Society for Northern Research) 20. 247–266.Google Scholar
Lindow, J.
1997 Murder and Vengeance among the gods: Baldr in Scandinavian mythology (Folklore Fellows Communications, 262). Helsinki: Finnish Academy of Science and Letters.Google Scholar
Lipiński, E.
1992 Dictionnaire de la civilisation phénicienne et punique. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
2001 Semitic Languages: Outline of a comparative grammar. 2nd ed. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Little, W., Onions, C. T., Friedrichsen, G. W. S., Fowler, H. W. and Coulson, J.
1964 The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. (Ed.) 2nd. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A., Lühr, R., Springer, O. and Purdy, K. K.
1998 Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Althochdeutschen.Vol. 2. Göttigen/Zurich: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. and Springer, O.
1988 Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Althochdeutschen.Vol. 1. Göttingen/Zurich: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Loewenthal, J.
1925 Cultgeschichtliche Fragen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 49. 63–88.Google Scholar
Looijenga, T.
2003 Texts and contexts of the oldest runic inscriptions (The Northern World 4). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lu, Y.
2016 The aquisition of English past tense in bilingual children. Austin: University of Texas at Austin.
Lucas, C.
2014 Contact-induced change. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 519–536. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lucas, C. and Lash, E.
2012 Contact as catalyst: The case for Coptic influence in the development of Arabic negation. Journal of Linguistics 46. 379–413. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, A.
2002 When did English begin? In Teresa Fanego, Belén Méndez-Naya & Elena Seoane (eds.), Sounds, words, texts and change: Selected papers from 11 ICEHL, Santiago de Compostela, 7–11 September 2000 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 224), 145–171. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Types and Degrees of Mixing: A Comparative Assessment of Latin and French Influences on English and German Word formation. Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic and Semiotic Analysis 13. 1–35.Google Scholar
Lutz, A. 2009 Word accent position and language contact in English and German. Anglia 127. 283–306.Google Scholar
2012a Language contact in the Scandinavian period. In Terttu Nevalainen Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the history of English, 508–517. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012b Norse influence on English in the light of general contact linguistics. In Iren Hegedűs & Aledandra Fodor (eds.), English historical linguistics 2010, 15–41. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Language Contact and Prestige. Anglia 131(4). 562–590. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macdonell, A. A.
1929 A practical Sanskrit dictionary: With transliteration, accentuation, and etymological analysis throughout. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mac-Gheogheagan, A. J.
1844 The history of Ireland, ancient and modern, taken from the most authentic records. (Trans.) Patrick O’Kelly. Dublin: James Duffy.Google Scholar
Maier, B.
2003 Die Religion der Germanen: Götter – Mythen – Weltbild. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Mailhammer, R.
2006 Ablaut – typologisch. Bamberg.
Mailhammer, R.
2007a The Germanic Strong Verbs: Foundation and Development of a New System (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 183). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mailhammer, R.
2007b Islands of resilience: the history of the German strong verbs from a systemic point of view. Morphology 77. 77–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Ablaut variation in the Proto-Germanic noun: The long arm of the strong verbs. Sprachwissenschaft 33(1). 279–300.Google Scholar
2009 Towards an Aspect-Based Analysis of the Verb Categories of Amurdak. Australian Journal of Linguistics 29. 349–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Die etymologische Forschung und Lehre auf dem Gebiet des Germanischen in Deutschland am Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts. Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia 15. 37–65.Google Scholar
2013 Towards a framework of contact etymology. In Robert Mailhammer (ed.), Lexical and Structural Etymology: Beyond Word Histories (Studies in Language Change 11), 9–32. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Etymology. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 423–441. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mailhammer, R., Laker, S. and Vennemann, T.
2003 PGmc. +drepa-, G treffen ‘to hit.’ Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia 8. 103–110.Google Scholar
Mailhammer, R. and Zeidan, R.
forthcoming Cross-linguistic influence in bilingual productions of the English past tense in Arabic heritage speakers of Australian English. Linguistics Vanguard . (accepted 06/2019)Google Scholar
Markoe, G.
2000 Phoenicians. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Markowitz, M.
n.d. Coinage of Carthage: A presentation given to the Ancient Numismatic Society of Washington DC. www​.academia​.edu​/3455640​/The​_Coinage​_of​_Carthage​_An​_Introduction (15 February 2016).
Matras, Y.
2000 How predictable is contact-induced change in grammar? In Colin Renfrew, April McMahon & Larry Trask (eds.), Time depth in historical linguistics, 563–583. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
2009 Language Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayhoff, Karl Friedrich Theodor (ed.) 1906 Naturalis Historia. Pliny the Elder. Leipzig: Teubner. www​.perseus​.tufts​.edu​/hopper​/text​?doc​=Perseus:text:1999​.02​.0138 (17 February 2015).Google Scholar
McCarter Jr., P. K.
2008 Hebrew. In Roger D. Woodard (ed.), The Ancient Languages of Syria-Palestine and Arabia, 36–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meakins, F.
2008 Land, language and identity: The socio-political origins of Gurindji Kriol. In Miriam Meyerhoff & Naomi Nagy (eds.), Social lives in language – sociolinguistics and multilingual speech communities : celebrating the work of Gillian Sankoff, 69–94. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meid, W.
1967 Germanische Sprachwissenschaft.Vol. 3: Wortbildungslehre. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1992 Die germanische Religion im Zeugnis der Sprache. In Heinrich Beck, Detlev Ellmers & Kurt Schier (eds.), Germanische Religionsgeschichte: Quellen und Quellenprobleme (Reallexikon Der Germanischen Altertumskunde, Ergänzungsbände 5), 486–507. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meier-Brügger, M.
2010 Indogermanische Sprachwissenschaft. 9th ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Melchior, L., Gilbert, M. T. P., Kivisild, T., Lynnerup, N. and Dissing, J.
2008 Rare mtDNA Haplogroups and Genetic Differences in Rich and Poor Danish Iron-Age Villages. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 135. 206–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mettinger, T. N. D.
1971 The Nominal Pattern qetulla in Biblical Hebrew. Journal of Semitic Studies 16. 2–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, R.
2011 Amharic. In Stefan Weninger, Geoffrey Khan, Michael P. Streck & Janet C. E. Watson (eds.), The Semitic Languages, 1178–1211. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, F.
1975 Indo-European: VSO, SOV, SVO, or all three. Lingua 37. 31–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, J. and Milroy, L.
1985 Linguistic change, social networks and speaker innovation. Journal for Linguistics 21. 339–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, B.
1985 Old English Syntax.2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, B. and Robinson, F. C.
2012 A Guide to Old English. Cichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Möller, H.
1911 Vergleichendes indogermanisch-semitisches Wörterbuch. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Th.
(ed.) 1881 Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum.Vol. 8. Berlin: Georg Reimer.Google Scholar
Morstadt, B.
2015 Die Phönizier. Darmstadt: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Moscati, S.
1988 Die Kolonisation des Mittelmeers. In Sabatino Moscati (ed.), Die Phönizier, 46–53. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.Google Scholar
1996 Die Karthager: Kultur und Religion einer antiken Seemacht. (Trans.) Hannelore von Gemmingen-Roser. Stuttgart/Zürich: belser.Google Scholar
Moscati, S., Spitaler, A., Ullendorff, E. and Soden, W. von
1964 An introduction to the comparative grammar of the Semitic languages: Phonology and morphology (Porta Linguarum Orientalium, Neue Serie 6). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Mossé, F.
1968 A Handbook of Middle English. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Movers, F. C.
1841 Die Phönizier.Vol. 1: Untersuchungen über die Religion der Phönizier, mit Rücksicht auf die verwandten Götterdienste der heidnischen Israeliten, der Carthager, Syrer, Babylonier und Aegypter. Bonn: Eduard Weber.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, P. 1979 Remarks on the Pidgin and Creole situation in Australia. A.I.A.S Newsletter 12. 41–53.Google Scholar
Munske, H. H.
1964 Das Suffix *-inga/−unga in den germanischen Sprachen (Marburger Beiträge Zur Germanistik 6). Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar
Muysken, P.
2013 Language contact outcomes as the result of bilingual optimization strategies. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16. 709–730. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myers-Scotton, C.
2006 Multiple voices: an introduction to bilingualism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Narten, J.
1973 Zur Flexion des lateinischen Perfeks. Münchner Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 31. 133–150.Google Scholar
Neumann, G.
1971 Substrate im Germanischen? Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, I. Philologisch-Historische Klasse 4. 75–99.Google Scholar
Neville, A.
2007 Mountains of Silver & Rivers of Gold. The Phoenicians in Iberia. Oxfort: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Noel Aziz Hanna, P.
2013 On the Loss of High-Frequency Words. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 25. 1–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 Wackernagels Gesetz im Deutschen: Zur Interaktion von Syntax, Phonologie und Informationsstruktur (Studia Linguistica Germanica 122). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Odenstedt, B.
1990 On the origin and early history of the runic script: Typology and graphic variation in the older futhark (Acta Academiae Regiae Gustavi Adolphi 59). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Odlin, T.
1989 Language Transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 Cross-Linguistic Influence. In Catherine J. Doughty & Michael H. Long (eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 436–486. Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
OED 1989 Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd, online (2000) ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
OED2 1993 Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd on compact disc for the Apple Macintosh. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
OED3 The Oxford English Dictionary. 3rd (selected entries). Oxford: Oxfod University Press.
O’Leary, D. L.
1923 Comparative grammar of the Semitic languages. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Orel, V. E.
2003 A Handbook of Germanic Etymology. Brill.Google Scholar
Ortega, I. F.
2013 Colonial representations and Carthaginian Archaeology. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 32(1). 53–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pakendorf, B.
2015 Contact and Siberian languages. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Handbook of language contact, 714–737. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Papaconstantinou, A.
2010 Introduction. In Arietta Papaconstantinou (ed.), The multilingual experience in Egypt from the Ptolemies to the ‘Abbāsids, 1–16. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann
(ed.) 1900 Grundriß der germanischen Philologie,. 2nd ed. Vol. 3. Straßburg: Karl Trübner.Google Scholar
Pfeifer, W.
1997 Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Deutschen. 3rd ed. Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Pfiffig, A. J.
1969 Die etruskische Sprache: Versuch einer Gesamtdarstellung. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
Philippa, M., Debrabandere, F., Quak, A., Schoonheim, T. and Sijs, N. van der
2003 Etymologisch woordenboek van het Nederlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Pilkington, N. 2013 An Archaeological History of Carthaginian Imperialism. Columbia: Columbia University.
Pinhas, Y.
2014 Einflüsse semitischer Sprachen auf das Deutsche. University of Munich MA.
Pirazzoli, P. A. and Pluet, J.
1991 World atlas of Holocene sea-level changes. Amsterdam/New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Plag, I.
2000 Irregular past tense formation in English interlanguage. In Ingo Plag & Klaus P. Schneider (eds.), Language Use, Language Acquisition and Language History. (Mostly) Empirical Studies in Honour of Rüdiger Zimmemann, 134–149. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans
(ed.) 1981 Morphologische (Ir-)Regularitäten: Aspekte der Wortstrukturtheorie. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Pohl, W.
2000 Die Germanen. Munich: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Pokorny, J.
1989 Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. 2nd ed. 2 vols. Berne: A. Francke.Google Scholar
Polenz, P. von
1979 Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. 9th ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Poplack, S. and Levey, S.
2010 Contact-induced grammatical change: A cautionary tale. In Peter Auer & Jürgen Erich Schmidt (eds.), Language and Space. An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation, vol. 1, 391–419. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Prokosch, E.
1939 A Comparative Germanic Grammar. Philadelphia: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Prunet, J.-F.
2006 External evidence and the Semitic root. Morphology 16. 41–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rackham, H.
(vols 1–5, 9) (trans.) 1949 Pliny’s Natural History.10 vols. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press/William Heinemann. www​.masseiana​.org​/pliny​.htm, (16 February 2015).Google Scholar
Ramat, P.
1981 Einführung ins Germanische. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998 The Germanic Languages. In Anna Ramat Giacalone & Paolo Ramat (eds.), The Indo-European Languages, 380–414. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Randall, W. and Jones, H.
2014 On the early origins of the Germanic preterite presents. Transactions of the Philological Society 113. 1–40.Google Scholar
Redslob, G. M.
1855 Thule. Die Phönicischen Handelswege nach dem Norden, insbesondere nach dem Bernsteinlande, sowie Die Reise des Pytheas von Massilien. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrich. https://​archive​.org​/stream​/thulediephnici00redsuoft#page​/n0​/mode​/2up, (27 February 2015).Google Scholar
Rehbein, J. and Karakoç, B.
2004 On contact-induced language change of Turkish aspects: Languaging in bilingual discourse. In C. B. Dabelsteen & N. Jørgensen (eds.), Languaging and language practices: Multilintual Turkish speakers in North-Western Europe. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Studies in Bilingualism.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H.
1947 Elements of Symbolic Logic. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ribichini, S.
1986 Agrouhèros, Baal Addir et le Pluton africain. In Commission d’Histoire et d’Archéologie d’Afrique du Nord (ed.), Histoire et archéologie de l’Afrique du Nord, 132–141 (Discussion pp. 141-142). Paris: CTHS.Google Scholar
Ringe, D.
2006 From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ringe, D. and Taylor, A.
2015 The development of Old English. Oxford: Osford University Press.Google Scholar
Rix, H. and Kümmel, M. J.
2001 Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben. 2nd ed. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne
2005 The Bilingual and Multilingual Community. In: Bhatia, Tej K. & William C. Ritchie (eds.), The Handbook of Bilingualism, 385-405, Malden: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, H. 1973 Phol ende Wuodan vuorun zi holza: Baldermythe oder Fohlenzauber? Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 95. 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. R.
1973 The penthouse principle and the order of constituents. In Clausia Corum, T. Cedric Smith-Stark & Ann Weiser (eds.), You take the high node and I’ll take the low node: Papers from the comparative syntax festival: The difference between main and subordinate clauses, 12 April 1973, 397–422. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Ross, M.
2013 Diagnosing contact processes from their outcomes: The importance of life stages. Journal of Language Contact 6. 5–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rössler, Otto
1980 Lybien von der Cyrenaica bis zur Mauretania Tingitana. In: Neumann, Günter & Jürgen Untermann (eds.), Die Sprachen im römischen Reich der Kaiserzeit, 267-283,Cologne: Rheinland-Verlag.Google Scholar
Röllig, Wolfgang
1980 Das Punische im Römischen Reich. In: Neumann, Günter & Jürgen Untermann (eds.), Die Sprachen im römischen Reich der Kaiserzeit, 285-299, Cologne: Rheinland-Verlag.Google Scholar
Rubba, J.
2001 Introflection. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König & Wulf Oesterreicher (eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals, vol. 1, 678–694. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Russel, P.
1995 An introduction to the Celtic languages. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sáenz-Badillos, A.
1997 A history of the Hebrew language: Translated by John Elwolde. (Trans.) John Elwolde. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saib, Jilali
1977 The treatment of geminates: Evidence from Berber. Studies in African Linguistics 8, 299-316.Google Scholar
Salaberri, I.
2017 Reconstructing word order in Proto-Germanic: A comparative Branching Direction Theory (BDT) of Old Saxon. Leioa: University of the Basque Country.
Salmons, J.
2015 Language shift and the Indo-Europeanization of Europe. In Robert Mailhammer, Theo Vennemann & Birgit Olsen (eds.), The Linguistic Roots of Europe, 103–124. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Sánchez, Liliana
2003 Quechua-Spanish bilingualism: Interference and convergence in functional categories (Language Acquisition & Language Disorders, 35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sanmartí, Joan
2009 Colonial Relations and Social Change in Iberia (Seventh to Third Centuries BC). In: Dietler, Michael & Carolina López-Ruiz (eds.), Colonial Encounters in Ancient Iberia, 49-88. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scardigli, P.
1973 Die Goten: Sprache und Kultur. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Schaffner, S.
2002 Die Götternamen. Die Sprache: Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 41. 153–205.Google Scholar
Scheungraber, C.
2010 Die Entwicklung der urindogermanischen Nasalpräsentien im Germanischen (Münchner Beiträge Zur Allgemeinen Und Historischen Sprachwissenschaft 2). Munich: Zentrum historische Sprachwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Schier, K.
1995a Balder. In Heinrich Beck, Dieter Geuenich & Heiko Steuer (eds.), Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde, vol. 2, 2–7. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1995b Gab es eine eigenständige Balder-Tradition in Dänemark? Mit einigen allgemeinen Überlegungen zum Problem der sogenannten ‘sterbenden und wiederauferstehenden Gottheiten’ in nordgermanischen und altorientalischen Überlieferungen. In Edith Marold & Christiane Zimmermann (eds.), Nordwestgermanisch, 125–153. Berlin: Walten de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schildt, J.
1981 Abriß der Geschichte der deutschen Sprache: Zum Verhältnis von Gesellschafts- und Sprachgeschichte. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Schoff, W. H. 1912 The periplus of Hanno: A voyage of discovery down the West African coast, by a Carthaginian admiral of the fifth century B.C., tranlated from the Greek by Wilfred H. Schoff: With explanatory passages quoted from numerous authors. Philadelphia: Commercial Museum. https://​archive​.org​/stream​/cu31924031441847#page​/n7​/mode​/2up (20 February 2015).Google Scholar
Schrijver, P.
2014 Language Contact and the Origins of the Germanic Languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schröder, F. R.
1929 Neuere Forschungen zur germanischen Altertumskunde und Religionsgeschichte III. Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift 17. 401–420.Google Scholar
1953 Balder und der zweite Merseburger Spruch. Germanisch-romanische Monatsschrift NF 3. 161–183.Google Scholar
1962 Balder-Probleme. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 84. 319–357.Google Scholar
Schrodt, R.
1974 Die Germanische Lautverschiebung und ihre Stellung im Kreise der indogermanischen Sprachen. Wien: Karl M. Halosar.Google Scholar
Schrötter, F. von and Bauer, N.
1970 Wörterbuch der Münzkunde. Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, M.
2006 Göttertränen im Watt. Der Spiegel.Google Scholar
Schulz, R.
2016 Abenteurer der Ferne: Die großen Entdeckungsfahrten und das Weltwissen der Antike. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Seebold, E.
1970 Vergleichendes und etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen starken Verben. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999 Die Konstituierung des Germanischen in sprachlicher Sicht. In Heinrich Beck (ed.), Germanenprobleme aus heutiger Sicht, 168–182. 2nd ed. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 Der epische Eingang im zweiten Merseburger Zauberspruch. In Hermann Reichert & Corinna Scheungraber (eds.), Germanische Altertumskunde: Quellen, Methoden, Ergebnisse: Akten des Symposiums anlässlich des 150. Geburtstags von Rudolf Much, Wien, 28.-30. September 2012 (Philologica Germanica 35). Wien: Fassbaender.Google Scholar
Segert, S.
1976 A Grammar of Phoenician and Punic. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
1984 A basic grammar of the Ugaritic language. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
1997 Phoenician and Punic Phonology. In Alan S. Kaye & Peter T. Daniels (eds.), Phonologies of Asia and Africa: Including the Caucasus, 55–64. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Seim, K. F.
2007 Runologie. In Odd Einar Haugen Astrid van Nahl (ed.), trans., Altnordische Philologie: Norwegen und Island, 147–222. Berlin: Walter de Guryter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L.
1972 Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics 10. 209–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, L.
2013 Cross-linguistic influence in bilingual development. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3. 3–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheynin, H.
2013 Indo-European, Old European and Afrasian, or contra Vennemann. In Jürgen Udolph (ed.), Europa Vasconica – Europa Semitica? Kritische Beiträge zur Frage nach dem baskischen und semitischen Substrat in Europa, 181–210. Hamburg: Baar.Google Scholar
Simek, R.
2003 Religion und Mythologie der Germanen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
2006 Lexikon der germanischen Mythologie. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner.Google Scholar
Simms, D. P. A. 2002 A word for ‘wild boar’ in Germanic, Italic, Balto-Slavic and Greek and its possible Semitic origins (Journal of Indo-European Studies, Monograph Series).Vol. 43.Google Scholar
Singer Gestoso, G.
2008 Amber in the Ancient Near East. i-Medjat 2. 2–4.Google Scholar
Smith, C.
1997 The Parameter of Aspect. 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Southern, M. R. V.
1999 Sub-grammatical survival: Indo-European s-mobile and its regeneration in Germanic (Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph Series 34). Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Men.Google Scholar
Spencer, A.
1998 Morphological Operations. In Andrew Spencer & Arnold Zwickey (eds.), The Handbook of Morphology, 123–143. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spurkland, T.
2005 Norwegian runes and runic inscriptions. (Trans.) Betsy van der Hoek. Woodbridge, Suffolk: Boydell.Google Scholar
Steuer, H.
1998 B. Ursprung und Ausbreitung der Germanen. In Heinrich Beck, Heiko Steuer & Dieter Tempe (eds.), Reallexikon der germanischen Altertumskunde, vol. 11, 318–328. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stichtenoth, D.
1968 Rufus Festus Avienus: Ora Maritima: Lateinisch und deutsch: Herausgegeben, übersetzt und und mit Anmerkungen versehen von Dietrich Stichtenoth. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Strabo
1923 The Geography of Strabo: With an English translation by Horace Leonard Jones.Vol. 2. 8 vols. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Stroh, F.
1974 Indogermanische Ursprünge, II. Altertum: Germanentum. In Friedrich Maurer & Heinz Rupp (eds.), Deutsche Wortgeschichte, vol. 1. 3rd ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sundquist, J. D.
2006 Syntactic variation in the history of Norwegian and the decline of XV word order. Diachronica 23. 105–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, H.
1900 The practical stury of languages: A guide for teachers and learners. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Bernd Kortmann
2012 Introduction: Linguistic complexity. In: Kortmann, Bernd & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi (eds.), Linguistic Complexity, 6-34. Berlin/New York: De GruyterGoogle Scholar
Szemerényi, O.
1952 The etymology of German Adel. Word 8. 42–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tekin, Talat
1968 A Grammar of Orkhon Turkic. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G.
2001 Language Contact: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
2008 Social and Linguistic Factors as Predictors of Contact-Induced Change. Journal of Language Contact 2. 42–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, S. G. and Kaufman, T.
1988 Language Contact, Creolization and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tichy, E.
2004 Indogermanistisches Grundwissen. 2nd ed. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Todd, J. M. and Eichel, M. H.
1974 A reappraisal of the prehistoric and classical amber trade in the light of new evidence. Journal of Baltic Studies 5(4). 295–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomback, R. S.
1978 A Comparative Semitic Lexicon of the Phoenician and Punic Languages (Society of Biblical Literature, Dissertation Series 32). Missoula, Montana: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Tosco, M.
1995 A Pidgin Verbal System: The Case of Juba Arabic. Anthropological Linguistics 37(4). 423–459.Google Scholar
Treumann, B. 2009 Lumbermen and Shipwrights: Phoenicians on the Mediterranean Coast of Southern Spain. In Michael Dietler & Carolina López-Ruiz (eds.), Colonial Encounters in Ancient Iberia, 169–190. London/Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tropper, J.
2003 Ugaritische Grammatik (Alter Orient Und Altes Testament 273). Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Uffmann, C.
2015 Loanword adaptation. In Patrick Honeybone & Joseph Salmons (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology, 644–665. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Unger, G. F.
1883 Die Kassiteriden und Albion. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie (N.F.) 38. 157–196.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T.
1974 Topics, subjects, and word order: From SXV to SVX via TVX. In John Anderson & Charles Jones (eds.), Historical Linguistics (Proceedings of the First International Congress of Historical Linguistics, Edinburgh, September 1973), vol. 2, 339–376. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1984 Bemerkung zum frühgermanischen Wortschatz. In Hans-Werner Eroms, Bernhard Gajek & Herbert Kolb (eds.), Studia Linguistica et Philologica: Festschrift für Klaus Matzel zum sechzigsten Geburtstag: überreicht von Schülern, Freunden und Kollegen, 105–109. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
1991 Zur relativen Chronologie von Lautwandel und Wortentlehnung: Die Hochgermanische Lautverschiebung und ahd. pforta, churt und impfitōn . Incontri Linguistici 14. 77–83.Google Scholar
1995 Etymologische Beziehungen im Alten Europa. Der GingkoBaum: Germanistisches Jahrbuch für Nordeuropa 13. 39–115.Google Scholar
1997 Atlantiker in Nordwesteuropa: Pikten und Vanen. In Stig Eliasson & Ernst Hakon Jahr (eds.), Language and its Ecology: Essays in memory of Einar Haugen, 451–476. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998a Andromeda and the Apples of the Hesperides. In Karlene Jones-Bley, Angela Della Volpe, Miriam Robbins Dexter & Martin E. Huld (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, Los Angeles, May 23, 24, 1997, 1–68. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
1998b  + plōg-/+ pleg-, + furh-/+ farh-, + folk-/+ flokk-, + felh-/+ folg-. In Karin Donhauser & Ludwig M. Eichinger (eds.), Germania Semitica: Deutsche Grammatik – Thema in Variationen: Festschrift für Hans-Werner Eroms zum 60. Geburtstag, 245–261. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
1998c Zur Etymologie von Éire, dem Namen Irlands. Sprachwissenschaft 23. 461–469.Google Scholar
2001 Germania Semitica: +aþal- (OE æðel-, G Adel) ‘nobility’: With an appendix on Gk. Ἄτλας. Sprachwissenschaft 26. 189–204.Google Scholar
2003a Germania Semitica: + sibjō . In Wilhelm Heizmann & Astrid van Nahl (eds.), Runica – Germanica – Mediaevalia (Ergänzungsbände Zum Reallexikon Der Germanischen Altertumskunde 37), 871–891. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003b Syntax und Sprachkontakt: Mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der indogermanischen Sprachen des Nordwestens. In Alfred Bammesberger & Theo Vennemann (eds.), Languages in Prehistoric Europe, 333–364. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. 2004a Note on the etymology of PGmc. + smītan and + smiþaz (E smite, smith, G schmeißen, Schmied, etc.). In Adam Hyllested, Anders Richardt Jørgensen, Jenny Helena Larsson & Thomas Olander (eds.), Per aspera ad asteriscos: Studia Indogermanica in honorem Jens Elmegård Rasmussen sexagenarii Idibus Martiis anno MMIV (Innsbrucker Beiträge Zur Sprachwissenschaft 112), 601–613. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
2004b Phol, Balder, and the birth of Germanic. In Irma Hyvärinen, Petri Kallio & Jarmo Korhonen (eds.), Etymologie, Entlehnungen und Entwicklungen: Festschrift für Jorma Koivulehto zum 70. Geburtstag, 439–457. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
2005 Glauben wir noch an die Lautgesetze? Zur Etymologie von Phol und Balder im Zweiten Merseburger Zauberspruch. In Gerhard Meiser & Olav Hackstein (eds.), Sprachkontakt und Sprachwandel: Akten der XI. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, 17.-23. September 2000, Halle an der Saale, 709–733. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
2006a Ne’er-a-face: A note on the etymology of penny: With an appendix on the etymology of pane . In Leiv Egil Breivik, Sandra Halveson & Kari E. Haugland (eds.), ‘These things write I vnto thee …’: Essays in honour of Bjørg Bækken, 269–290. Oslo: Novus Press.Google Scholar
2006b The name of the Isle of Thanet. In Andrew James Johnston, Ferdinand von Mengden & Stefan Thim (eds.), Language and text: Current perspectives on English and Germanic historical linguistics and philology [a festschrift for Klaus Dietz on the occasion of his seventieth birthday 10 December 2005], 345–374. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
2006c Germanische Runen und phönizisches Alphabet. Sprachwissenschaft 34. 367–429.Google Scholar
2009 Zur Reihung der Runen im älteren Futhark. In Wilhelm Heizmann, Klaus Böldl & Heinrich Beck (eds.), Analecta Septentrionalia: Beiträge zur nordgermanischen Kultur- und Literaturgeschichte [a festschrift for Kurt Schier] (Ergänzungsbände Zum Reallexikon Der Germanischen Altertumskunde 65), 834–863. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 The Source of the Ing Rune and of the Futhark. Sprachwissenschaft 28. 1–14.Google Scholar
2011a English as a contact language: Typology and comparison. Anglia 129. 217–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011b Griechisch, lateinisch, etruskisch, karthagisch? Zur Herkunft der Runen. In Elvira Glaser, Anna Seiler & Michelle Waldispühl (eds.), LautSchriftSprache: Beiträge zur vergleichenden Graphematik, 47–81. Zurich: Chronos.Google Scholar
2012a Athel and its relatives: Origin and decline of a noble family. English Studies 93. 950–986. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012b A note on the etymology of Germanic + skellingaz ‘shilling.’ In Theo Vennemann & Patrizia Aziz Noel Hanna (eds.), Germania Semitica (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 259), 485–495. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a The origin of the p rune. Sprachwissenschaft 38(281–286).Google Scholar
2013b The mediae (b g d) in Punic and in the futharc. Sprachwissenschaft 38. 265–280.Google Scholar
2013c Vowels in Punic and in Runic. Sprachwissenschaft 38(265–280).Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. 2015a Radical word order changeby substratal causation. In Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre & Calle-Martin Javier (eds.), Approaches to Middle English: Variation, contact and change (Studies in English Medieval Language and Literature 47), 97–127. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2015b Origins of runic writing: A comparison of theories. In Robert Mailhammer, Theo Vennemann & Birgit Olsen (eds.), The linguistic roots of Europe, 295–341. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
2016 An etymology for the name of A Coruña / La Coruña. Beiträge zur Namenforschung 51.Google Scholar
Versteegh, K.
2010 Contact and the Development of Arabic. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vierros, M.
2013 Bilingualism in Hellenistic Egypt. In Gergios K. Giannakis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics. Leiden: Brill Online. http://​referenceworks​.brillonline​.com​/entries​/encyclopedia​-of​-ancient​-greek​-language​-andlinguistics​/bilingualism​-in​-hellenistic​-egypt​-EAGLL​_COM​_00000047.Google Scholar
Vijūnas, A.
2005 Review of Heizmann & van Nahl (eds) 2003. Indo-European Studies Bulletin 11. 131–143.Google Scholar
Voigt, R.
2013 Europa Semitica? Bemerkungen zu Theo Vennemanns semit(ohamiti)istisch-(indo)germanischer Komparatistik. In Jürgen Udolph (ed.), Europa Vasconica – Europa Semitica? Kritische Beiträge zur Frage nach dem baskischen und semitischen Substrat in Europa (Beiträge Zur Lexikographie Und Namenforschung 6), 325–359. Hamburg: Baar.Google Scholar
Vries, J. de
1956 Altgermanische Religionsgeschichte (Grundriß der Germanischen Philologie 12.1–2). 2nd ed. 2 vols. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1977 Altnordisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. 3rd ed. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, J.
1892 1892. Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung. Indogermanische Forschungen 1. 333–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, H.
1975 Studies in the origins of early Celtic traditions. Ériu 26. 1–26.Google Scholar
Wagner, M. L.
1969 Die Punier und ihre Sprache in Sardinien. Die Sprache 3. 27–42 and 78–107.Google Scholar
Walde, A. and Hofmann, J. B.
1982 Lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. 5th ed. 2 vols. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Walkden, G.
2009 The comparative method in syntactic reconstruction. University of Cambridge PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
2014 Syntactic reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walter, L. Edna
(ed.) 1919 Mother Goose’s Nursery Rhymes. London: A. & C. Black. http://​books​.google​.de​/books​?id​=wWkyIh4VuCoC​&pg​=PA31​&lpg​=PA31​&dq (3 December 2011).Google Scholar
Wansborough, J. E.
1996 Lingua franca in the Mediterranean. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Watkins, C.
1964 Preliminaries to the reconstruction of Indo-European sentence structure. In H. G. Lunt (ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists, 1035–1045. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1976 Towards Proto-Indo-European syntax: Problems and pseudoproblems. In Sanford B. Steever, Carol A. Walker & Salikoko S. Mufwene (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax, April 22 1976, 305–326. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Weerman, F.
1989 The V2 conspiracy: A synchronic and a diachronic analysis of verbal positions in Germanic languages (Publications in Language Sciences 31). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Wehr, H. 1985 Arabisches Wörterbuch für die Schriftsprache der Gegenwart: Arabisch-Deutsch. 5th ed. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U.
1968 Languages in Contact. 6th ed. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W. and Herzog, M.
1968 Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change. In W. P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics: A symposium, 95–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wessely, K.
1913 Über den Bernstein in seiner kulturhistorischen Bedeutung. Schriften des Verienes zur Verbreitung Naturwissenschaftlicher Kenntnisse in Wien 53. 249–281.Google Scholar
West, M.
1953 A general service list of English words with semantic frequencies. rev. and enlarged. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wigram, George V.
1996 The Englishman's Hebrew concordance of the Old Testament: Coded with Strong’s concordance numbers. Peabody, Massachusetts: Hendrickson. [Reprint of 3rd edn. of 1874, with Strong’s numbering added. 6th printing 2006.]Google Scholar
Winford, D.
2003 An Introduction to Contact Linguistics. Maldon, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2005 Contact-induced changes: classification and processes. Diachronica 22. 373–427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wittke, A.-M.
2011 Commerce and trade in the Mediterranean world 7th/6th cents. – 4th cent. BC. In Anne-Maria Wittke, Eckart Olshausen, Richard Szydlak & Vera Sauer (eds.), Brill’s New Pauly Supplements I – Volume 3: Historical Atlas of the Ancient World. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wolff, Ludwig
(ed.) 1965 Otfrids Evangelienbuch (Altdeutsche Textbibliothek 49). 5th ed. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Woods, C.
2006 Bilingualism, scribal learning, and the death of Sumerian. In Seth L. Sander (ed.), Margins of writing, origins of cultures, 91–120. Chicago: The Oriental Institute.Google Scholar
Wright, W.
1896 A grammar of the Arabic language. (Trans.) W. Robertson Smith. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yip, V. and Matthews, S.
2007 The Bilingual Child. Early Development and Language Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zalloua, P. A., Platt, D. E., El Sibai, M., Khalife, J., Makhoul, N., Haber, M., Xue, Y., et al.
2008 Identifying Genetic Traces of Historical Expansions: Phoenician Footprints in the Mediterranean. The American Journal of Human Genetics 83. 633–642. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Þorgeirsson, H.
2012 Late placement of the finite verb in Old Norse fornyrðislag meter. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 24. 233–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Subjects & Metadata

Linguistics

Afro-Asiatic languages
Germanic linguistics
Historical linguistics
BIC Subject: CFF – Historical & comparative linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009010 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Historical & Comparative
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2019028027 | Marc record